HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-023 Jennifer Pearson Rezone (3611 Englewood Avenue) Return To:
Yakima City Clerk
129 North Second Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Document Title: Ordinance No. 2000 -23
(Pearson Rezone of 3611 Englewood Avenue)
a 1 4 1 4. 1 0T-6 . 6- 2 NJUi g1Q P( CrA)
Grantor: City of Yakima
Legal Description: The south 200 feet of the west 100 feet of the
Southeast 1 /4 of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Southeast 1 /4
of Section 15, Township 13 North, Range 18 EWM
except the south 20 feet thereof conveyed to Yakima
County for a road, recorded in Volume 66 of Deeds,
page 75, records of Yakima County, Washington.
Parcel Numbers: 181315 - 43006
7176648
Page: 1 of 7
07/1412000 11.00A
YAKIMA_CITY _ ___ ORD_ _ $14..00_ YakimaCo, WA
ORDINANCE NO. 2000- ? 3
AN ORDINANCE concerning land use and zoning; and rezoning one parcel addressed
3611 Englewood Avenue from Multi - Family Residential (R -3) to
Professional Business (B -1), and amending the Official Yakima Urban
Area Zoning Map accordingly.
WHEREAS, Jennifer Pearson ( "Applicant ") has requested amendment of the Official Yakima
Urban Area Zoning Map to rezone one parcel (approximately 0.4 acre) addressed 3611
Englewood Avenue (Yakima County Assessor's Parcel #181315- 43006) (referred to below as
"the Subject Property ") from Multi - Family Residential (R -3) to Professional Business (B -1);
and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2000, the City of Yakima Hearing Examiner conducted a duly
convened, open- record public hearing regarding the requested rezone (UAZO RZ #2 -99), and
after considering the contents of the file and evidence received at the public hearing, issued his
Examiner's Recommendation, Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5, dated May 10, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner recommended that the Subject Property should be
rezoned from Multi - Family Residential (R -3) to Professional Business (B -1); and
WHEREAS, at its regular public meeting on June 27, 2000, the City Council duly considered
the requested rezone and the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation; and
WHEREAS, after considering the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, the contents of the
file, and the statements of interested persons, the City Council fords with respect to the
requested rezone, that:
1. The Subject Property is suitable to be classified Professional Business (B -1);
2. There exists a public need for the requested rezone;
3. Circumstances have changed since the existing Multi - Family Residential (R -3) zoning was
established which now make the requested rezone appropriate; and
4. The requested rezone is consistent with and complies with:
a. The requirements and considerations set forth in chapter 15.23 of the Yakima
Municipal Code;
b. The goals and policies of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan;
c. The intent of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance;
d. Other applicable land use controls; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to adopt the Hearing Examiner's findings and
conclusions and recommendation to approve the requested rezone; now, therefore,
ORDINANCE: REZONE APPROVAL
RZ -2 -99 — PEARSON -- 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE Page 1 of 3
1111111011 111 ilm 7176648
Net 2 of 7
�YAKIMA_CITY 07/1412000 11,00R
ORD $14..00_ Yakima Co, WA
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA,
WASHINGTON:
Section 1. The Yakima City Council adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations
of the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5, dated May 10, 2000,
and incorporates that Hearing Examiner's Recommendation by reference as part of this
ordinance.
Section 2. Regarding the Subject Property, which is addressed 3611 Englewood Avenue,
and legally described as:
THE SOUTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4
OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EWM EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET
THEREOF CONVEYED TO YAKIMA COUNTY FOR A ROAD, RECORDED
IN VOLUME 66 OF DEEDS, PAGE 75, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Yakima County Assessor's Parcel #181315 -43006
the City Council fords formally that:
1. The Subject Property is suitable to be classified Professional Business (B -1);
2. There exists a public need for the requested rezone;
3. Circumstances have changed since the existing Multi - Family Residential (R -3). zoning was
established which now make the requested rezone appropriate; and
4. The requested rezone is consistent with and complies with:
a. The requirements and considerations set forth in Chapter 15.23 Yakima Municipal
Code;
b. The goals and policies of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan;
c. The intent of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance; and
d. Other applicable land use controls.
Section 3. The Official Yakima Urban Area Zoning Map shall be amended to rezone the
Subject Property from from Multi - Family Residential (R -3) to Professional Business (B -1).
Section 4. The City Clerk is here by authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this
ordinance with the Yakima County Auditor.
Section 5. Subject to the foregoing provisions and conditions, this ordinance shall be in full
force and effect 30 days after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law and by
the City Charter, and this action shall be final and conclusive unless within 21 days from the
date this ordinance is passed by the City Council an aggrieved party commences proceedings
for review pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 36.70C RCW.
ORDINANCE: REZONE APPROVAL
RZ -2 -99 — PEARSON -- 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE Page 2 of 3
111113111111011 1111111 111 7176648
Page: 3 of 7
.__YAKIMA_CITY 07114/2000 11.00A
ORD $14_.00 Yakima Co, WA
PASSES BY THE CITY COUNCIL at a regular meeting and signed and approved this
,9-7 day of June, 2000.
4,,,,, 4,5,.
Mary Place, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publication Date: 6 A' -
Effective Date: 7 ' 3 - a
C: \word\rezones \pearson - 3611 englewood\ord final.doc Last printed 06/22/00 11:52 AM
Certified to be a true and correct copy of the
original filed in my office. 7 -/c
Niii
G Y CLERK
Eli a; 144_, - 1",674
B
ip
\
ii
i
ORDINANCE: REZONE APPROVAL
RZ -2 -99 — PEARSON -- 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE Page 3 of 3
- - -- __ - - -- - - -_-
7148
P a g e: 4 of
07/14 11 7 00R
'_YAKIMA_CITY ORD $14 -.00 Yakima_Co,_
Rezone Application by ) EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION
)
Jennifer Pearson at ) City No. UAZO RZ #2 -99
3611.Englewood Avenue, )
from R -3 to B -1 ) Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
The Examiner conducted a public hearing on April 26, 2000.
The staff report presented by Dan Valoff recommended approval.
There was no opposition. The Examiner inspected the property
prior to the hearing.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION. The Examiner recommends approval.
From the view of the site, the matters contained in the
official record, including the staff report, a review of both the
Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the Yakima Urban Area
•
Zoning Ordinance, and from evidence received at the hearing, the
Examiner makes the following:
FINDINGS
1. Applicant. Jennifer Pearson.
2. Location. 3611 Englewood Avenue, Assessor's parcel
number 181315- 43006. The legal description is attached to the
application and incorporated by reference.
3. Application. Rezone.
4. Proposed Zone. Professional Business (B -1).
5. Proposed Use. Unknown, except that development will
probably be consistent with the medical /office development
currently occurring in this area.
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 1
Jennifer Pearson
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
NH 11 011 11 7176648
Page: 5 of 7
07/14/2000 11 00R
�YRKIMRCITY ORD $14_.00 Yakima Co, WA
6. Current Zoning and Use. The property is currently
zoned Multi - Family Residential (R -3), and has a single family
1 dwelling. The property on the north side of Englewood is zoned B-
1 on all three sides of this parcel. Property to the south,
across Englewood, is zoned R -2.
7. Project Description. The staff report is adopted and
incorporated by reference. This parcel should have been rezoned
when the rest of this area was rezoned to B -1, but the property
owner at that time was not interested. He is elderly, his
circumstances have changed, and it is now the family's wish to
rezone the property.
8. Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. The criteria for
rezones established by YMC 15.23.030(5) are all met, and are fully
reviewed in the staff report.
9. State Environmental Policy Act. A Determination of
Non - significance was issued and is now final.
10. Public Notice. Public notice of the hearing was
provided in accordance with the ordinance.
From the foregoing Findings, the Examiner makes the
following:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Examiner has jurisdiction.
2. The proposed rezone conforms to the goals and policies
• of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and to the intent of
the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance; the property is suitable
for uses permitted in the B -1 zoning district; there are no
problems with neighborhood compatibility; and a public need does
exist for the proposed change.
3. All notice provisions of the ordinance have been
complied with.
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 2
Jennifer Pearson
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
7176648
II 111111 IIII I III II Nip: 6 of 7
07/14/2000 1110A
�YR KIMA_CITY ORO X14 Yakima Co, WA
Based upon the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the
Examiner submits to the•Yakima City Council the following:
RECOMMENDATION
Approve this rezone application, from R -3 to B
Respectfully submitted this 10 day of May, 2000.
Ci
Phili A. La
P
Hearing Examiner
•
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 3
Jennifer Pearson
•
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
•
I II
I II I II 7176648
Page: 7 of 7
07/14/2000 11:00A
•
YAKIMA_CIIY OR O $14.10 Yakima Co, WA
1
11
•
BUSINESS OF THE QTY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM NO.
FOR MEETING OF: June 27.2000
ITEM TITLE: Public Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation
approving a rezone request submitted by Ms. Jennifer Pearson.
SUBMITTED BY: William Cook, Director of Community & Economic
Development
CONTACT PERSON / TELEPHONE: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner, 575 -6163
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
111) Public Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve the
rezone request by Ms. Jennifer Pearson from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to B -1,
Professional Business. This one - parcel rezone is located at 3611 Englewood Avenue.
There was no opposition to the rezone at the Hearing Examiner hearing.
Resolution _ Ordinance X Contract _ Other (Specify)
Funding Source
APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: 4 C /Li
City Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Hearing Examiner's recommendation and
pass rezone ordinance.
II BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner recommends approval.
COUNCIL ACTION:
•
1
1
1
•
JENNIFER PEARSON REZONE
EXHIBIT LIST
City Council meeting
•
June 27, 2000
Applicant: Jennifer Pearson
Site Address: 3611 Englewood Avenue
File Number: UAZO RZ#2 -99
Staff Contact: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner
EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT PAGE # DATE
1 Rezone and Environmental Checklist Applications 16 11/15/99
2 DST Comments 24 12/01/99
3 Mans: Aerial, Zoning, Vicinity, Mailing and 29 11/15/990
Atlas
4 Hearing Notices, SEPA Determination of 40 4/4/00 thru 4/6/00
Nonsignificance, Parties of Record, Posting of
Property and Determination of Application
Completeness
5 Staff Report 45 4/26/00
6 Hearing Examiner's recommendation to City 52 5/11/00
Council, Affidavit of Mailing and hearing sign in
sheet
7
•
8
9
10
11
•
EXHIBIT 6
°_� ,. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
'' Planning: Division
129 North Second Street
`- `� _ ' ° ,
r Yakima, Washington 98901
'' > �4„ � s - Phone (509) 575 -6183 o Fax (509) 575 -6105
Don Skone, Manager
NOTIFICATION OF HEARING EXAMINER
RECOMMENDATION TO THE '
YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL
On May 9, 2000 the Yakima Hearing Examiner rendered his recommendation on
a rezone application submitted by Ms. Jennifer Pearson. The applicant is
proposing to rezone a single parcel from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to B -1
(Professional Business) zoning district. The subject property is located at 3611
Englewood Avenue, Yakima, Washington. The application was reviewed at a
' public hearing held by the Hearing Examiner on April 26, 2000.
A copy of the Hearing Examiner's Findings and Recommendation is enclosed.
• The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation will be considered by the Yakima City
Council in a public meeting to be scheduled. The City Clerk will notify you of the
date, time and place of the public meeting. For further information or assistance
you may contact Dan Valoff, Associate Planner, City of Yakima Planning
Division located on the 2nd floor of Yakima City Hall, (129 North Second
Street), 575 -6163.
Don S. Skone {
Planning Manager
•
Date of mailing: 5/11/00 Filed
Hearing Examiner
EXH # Date -s
File # " te)41-746.°2 - 9f
ID Yakima
DOC.
ru p
INDEX
# Ste,
OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER
FOR THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA
PHILIP A. LAMB 311 NORTH THIRD STREET, P.O. BOX 4 (509)248 -0706
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98907
FAX: (509) 248 -0707
RECEIVED
May 9, 2000 MAY 1 0 2000
CITY OF YAKIMA
PLANNING DIV
Chris Wilson
City of Yakima
Planning Division
129 N. 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Re: Jennifer Pearson
City No. UAZO RZ #2 -99
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
Dear Chris: -
4 10
My decision
y is enclosed. The hearing was held on April 26,
2000.
Best personal regards,
Prirt■'
Philip A. Lamb
PAL /pal
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Terri Cyr, w /encl.
Board of County Commissioners w /encl.
411)
DOC.
INDEX
# SI
Rezone Application by ) EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION
).
Jennifer Pearson at ) City No. UAZO RZ #2 -99
3611.Englewood Avenue, )
from R -3 to B-1 ) Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
The Examiner conducted a public hearing on April 26, 2000.
The staff report presented by Dan Valoff recommended approval.
There was no opposition. The Examiner inspected the property
prior to the hearing.
•
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION. The Examiner recommends approval.
From the view of the site, the matters contained in the
official record, including the staff report, a review of both the
4111 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the Yakima Urban Area
Zoning Ordinance, and from evidence received at the hearing, the
Examiner makes the following:
FINDINGS
1. Applicant. Jennifer Pearson.
2. Location. 3611 Englewood Avenue, Assessor's parcel
number 181315- 43006. The legal description is attached to the
application and incorporated by reference.
3. Application. Rezone.
4. Proposed Zone. Professional Business (B -1).
5. Proposed Use. Unknown, except that development will
probably be consistent with the medical /office development
currently occurring in this area.
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 1
Jennifer Pearson
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
HEARING EXAMINER
DOC. FOR THE
INDEX CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA
POST OFFICE BOX 4
# .0 YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98907
# (509) 248-0706
6. Current Zoning and Use. The property is currently
zoned Multi - Family Residential (R -3), and has a single family •
dwelling. The property on the north side of Englewood is zoned B-
1 on all three sides of this parcel. Property to the south,
across Englewood, is zoned R -2.
7. Project Description. The staff report is adopted and
incorporated by reference. This parcel should have been rezoned
when the rest of this area was rezoned to B -1, but the property
owner at that time was not interested. He is elderly, his
circumstances have changed, and it is now the family's wish to
rezone the property.
8. Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. The criteria for
rezones established by YMC 15.23.030(5) are all met, and are fully
reviewed in the staff report.
9. State Environmental Policy Act. A Determination of
Non- significance was issued and is now final.
10. Public Notice. Public notice of the hearing was
provided in accordance with the ordinance.
III
From the foregoing Findings, the Examiner makes the
following:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Examiner has jurisdiction.
2. The proposed rezone conforms to the goals and policies
of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and to the intent of
the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance; the property is suitable
for uses permitted in the B -i zoning district; there are no
problems with neighborhood compatibility; and a public need does
exist for the proposed change.
3. All notice provisions of the ordinance have been
complied with.
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 2
Jennifer Pearson
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
DOC HEARING EXAMINER
FOR THE
INDEX CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA
4' POST OFFICE BOX 4
r YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98907
(509) 248 -0706
Based upon . the foregoing Findings and Conclusions. the
1111 Examiner submits to the Yakima City - Council the following:
RECOMMENDATION
•
Approve this rezone application, from R -3 to B -1.
Respectfully submitted this 10 day of May, 2000.
•
•
. P J., .
Philip A.
. Hearing Examiner
III . •
. .
• •
. .
•
•
•
• . ,
. •
• •
•
•
•
•
. . .
. .
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 3 .
III Jennifer Pearson
Examiner No. IU00 -2 -5
DOC HEARING EXAMINER
FOR THE
INDEX CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA
•
# POST OFFICE
}r (, / g YAKIMA, WASHINGTON BOX 9 8907
• (509) 248 -0706
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
Re: U,47 e o?- l
36/( 6 Qor.e tofre
1, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of the Hearing Examiners
recommendation to the Yakima City Council. A true and correct copy of which is
enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all parties of record which
are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the PIagniing Division, and
that said notices were mailed by me on the day of F ,2000.
r
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the S
statements made herein are just and true.
e /1,1„;. d ,=j4,
Christine M. Wilson
DOC.
INDEX
HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET
• CITY OF YAKIMA
HEARING EXAMINER
YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
HEARING DATE: April 26, 2000
CASE #: APPLICANT: SITE ADDRESS:
#(A) UAZO CL(3) #2 -00 & ADM ADJ #6 -00 Keith Meers One So. 12 Ave.
#(B) UAZO RZ #2 -99 Jennifer Pearson 3611 Englewood Ave.
#(C) UAZO APPEAL #4 -00- Jamie Walther 708 So. 60 Ave.
INDICATE CASE NO. NAME: ADDRESS: ZIP:
#(A,B,C): PLEASE PRINT
--n ,o IS — 1(U. 3 . ("Oh Air cl 2g Qg
Ste, t ;i'Lfl, - .
e_ r' L � . - /41)--4
ll� � ' 75 �, -'jt� 6-c } '57
,_ c !I j I G 1
i Y 1 €Qrs ��� tvrh► 5 z�le C7 r t UI
4�t' - A S.A. ►in CA_N ev - `7 az-1 S �o' "IggoR
o . Le:x 9 g 90
0
Doc.
INDEX
EXHIBIT 5
0
0
CITY OF YAKIMA
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING
HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING:
APRIL 26, 2000
STAFF REPORT
FILE: UAZO RZ #2 -99; UAZO'EC #19 -99
PROPONENT: Jennifer Pearson
REQUEST: Rezone a single 0.40 acre parcel from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to
B -1 (Professional Business).
LOCATION: 3611 Englewood Avenue.
STAFF CONTACT: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner. (575 -6163)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division recommends approval of this request.
FINDINGS
BACKGROUND
On November 15, 1999 Ms. Jennifer Pearson made application with the City
Planning Division for a rezone from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to B -1
(Professional Business) located at 3611 Englewood Avenue. The property is
currently occupied with a single family dwelling. The applicant has no current
plans for developing this property. The narrative supplied by the applicant indicates
that the purpose of the rezone is to allow for future B -1 type development. No
development plans have been submitted with this rezone request.
A similar request for a rezone of 0.89 acres from R -3 to B -1 by Gary Lukehart located
at the Northeast corner of North 39th and Englewood was approved by the Hearing
Examiner and the City Council in March of 1998. This rezone request is contiguous
to the Lukehart rezone. On November 28, 1999 the City Council legislativly rezone
the adjoining property to the east from R -3 to B -1. The result of rezoning this
property will uniformly zone this block to B -1 between North 37th and 39th
Avenues.
Filed
Hearin Examin
1 EXH # IOC.
J. Pearson rezone _ D ate " �" I DEX
3611 Englewood Ave. File # / Zir oZ -99 ,'
ZONING AND LAND USE
The subject property is zoned R -3, Multi- Family Residential. This 0.40 acre parcel is
currently occupied with a single family dwelling. Land use and zoning on adjacent
properties is as follows:
Location Zoning Existing Land use
North B -1 Professional office
East B -1 Professional office
South R -2 Mixed residential
West B -1 Single family residential
The subject property are bounded by North 37th Avenue, a local access street to the
East, Fairbanks Avenue, a local access street to the North and Englewood Avenue, a
Collector street to the South. All of these streets are fully developed with asphalt
paving, concrete barrier curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lights. The nearby
intersection of North 40th Avenue and Englewood is fully signalized. Englewood
Avenue carries an average of 5,050 vehicle trips per day and operated at Level of
Service "A ".
YAKIMA URBAN AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• The 1997 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map
designates this area as being suitable for high density residential development. •
• Objective G1: Encourage the physical development of the Yakima Urban Area in
a manner that enhances its image as the cultural and business center. (1997 Plan)
URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE STANDARDS
The Professional Business Zoning District (B -1) is intended to; 1) Establish and
preserve areas for professional offices; and, 2) Provide a buffer between commercial
clusters and residential neighborhoods; and, 3) Locate professional offices in areas
presently receiving a full range of urban services. Professional offices and, in some
areas, a mix of professional offices and Multi - family dwellings are the primary use
of the B -1 zoning district.
The proposed rezone would be an expansion of properties in this area that were
rezoned B -1 zoned properties for professional medical offices of the Medical View
West Subdivision platted and rezoned to B -1 in May 1993. If approved the entire
block would be zoned B -1 between North 37th and 39th Avenues. The surrounding
area has developed with senior housing complexes, and medical offices, over the
past 8 years.
In reviewing a rezone request the following items need to be taken into
consideration by the reviewing officials as stated in UAZO 15.23.030:
2 DOC.
J. Pearson rezone INDEX
3611 Englewood Ave. # f
• s
1. Land use compatibility: The proposed B -1 development is compatible with the
immediate area. The B -1 zoning district allows professional office development
and Multi- family development up to 12 dwelling units per net residential acre as a
Class (1) use . Adjoining land uses in the area consist of a single family dwelling
zoned R -3 to the west, a large of condominium development, zoned R -3 to the
North, and, a zero-lot line, attached single - family development, zoned R -3 to the
East. Testimony at the hearing should be considered in determining whether this
proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses.
2. Comprehensive Plan compliance: The proposed zoning to B -1 is in compliance
with the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as noted in this staff report.
3. Suitability of property for existing (R -3) uses: The existing character of
surrounding land uses along with location near a major arterial would indicate that
the subject property is suitable for high density residential development. The Multi-
Family Residential District is intended to establish and preserve high density
residential development by excluding activities not compatible with residential
uses. The R -3 zoning district allows for high density residential development of
more than 12 dwelling units per net residential acre in areas receiving a full range of
• urban services preferably located in areas near neighborhood shopping centers.
Traffic generated by high density residential development should be designed not to
pass through lower density residential areas. The urban area has few locations of
vacant large tracts of R -3 zoned land. Most of the R -3 zoned property consist of
small parcels, less than one acre, which are scattered throughout the urban area.
4. Suitability of property for proposed (B -1) uses: The existing character of the
surrounding land uses would indicate that the subject property is suitable for B -1
type development. The property is large enough in size and is suitable for most uses
permitted in the B -1 zoning district identified in UAZO Table 4 -1. The B -1 zone is
the most limited business zone, with very few uses permitted outright as a Class 1
use. Most commercial and retail uses are not permitted in the B -1 zone.
Professional offices and, in some areas, a mix of professional offices and multifamily
dwellings are the primary use of the B -1 zoning district.
5. Public facilities: Public infrastructure including sewer, and water are adequate to
serve this location. Previous traffic studies completed as part of the environmental
analysis for other land use actions in this area indicate that peak hour traffic
generation for R -3 and B -1 land uses are about the same. However, B -1 uses
typically generate two to three times the total volume of trips as R -3 uses and these
vehicle trips are distributed throughout the day.
3 DOC.
J. Pearson rezone INDEX
3611 Englewood Ave. # q3
6. Public Need: The applicant has stated that this zone change would conform to
•
the City's original plan to make the property conform with the surrounding
property. The future development of this property will conform with the
surrounding properties.
DESIGN SERVICES TEAM COMMENTS
A design services team meeting was held on December 1, 1999 to discuss the
technical aspects of this proposal. The following is a summary of the comments
received:
Water /Irrigation - 12 -inch water main in Englewood Ave, fire flow available 3,500
gallons per minute.
Customer Services - Domestic water currently serves 3611 Englewood and sanitary
sewer is available fro a 8 -inch main in Englewood Avenue.
Traffic Engineering - Englewood Avenue carries an average of 5050 vehicle trips per
day and operated at Level of Service "A ".
No other written comments were received.
TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
This project was reviewed under the Transportation Capacity Management
Ordinance. On April 3, 2000 the City Traffic Engineer issued a memo stating that
non - project rezone was considered as a single tenant office for the transportation
concurrency analysis. The conversion of the existing house to an office would be
exempt from Concurrency Review pursuant to the March 20, 2000 changes in the
Concurrency ordinance. Therefore the proposed rezone and conversion of the
house would not have a detrimental impact on the capacity of the arterial street
system. If future plans for this site exceed the exempt threshold, concurrency review
would be necessary.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Yakima on
April 5, 2000. This determination was based on SEPA guidelines (WAC 197 -11 -340);
a twenty comment period was given to this proposal with the comment period .
ending April 25, 2000. No significant comments were received.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notice of this hearing was provided as follows:
Posting of property: April 5, 2000
Legal Ad Published: April 5, 222
Notification of property owners: April 5, 2000
•
DOC.
4 INDEX
J. Pearson rezone
3611 Englewood Ave.
• , ,
.,
FINDINGS
The Planning Division for the City of Yakima has reviewed the rezone application,
Environmental Checklist and related materials by the applicant and offers the
following findings.
1. The proposed rezone conforms with the goals and policies of the Yakima Urban
Area Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning
Ordinance.
2. The property is well suited for B -1 uses. The existing character of surrounding
land uses along with location adjacent to a collector street would indicate that the
subject property is suitable for B -1 type development.
3. If approved this block would be entirely zoned B -1 between North 37th and 39th '
Avenues.
F
4. The proposal is in compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), a
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Yakima on
411 April 5, 2000. _
5. All notice p rovisions of the, ordinance have been complied with.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division for the City of Yakima recommends approval of the
proposed rezone from R -3 to B -1.
•
•
5 DOC.
J. Pearson rezone. INDEX
3611 Englewood Ave. #
•
EXHIBIT 4
of YA DEPARTMENT OF CON. JNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPM. T
l~;. '��',,,, Planning Division .....1
•• E ' , `:
0 129 North Second Street
W f ;.. �l Yakima, Washington 98901
.
s ab_= Phone (509) 575 -6183 • Fax (509) 575 -6105
Don Skone, Manager •
POSTING OF PROPERTY
CERTIFICATION
I understand that the Section 16.05.010 of the Yakima Municipal Code and the Urban Area
Zoning Ordinance require me to post the property at least 20 days prior to the public hearing.
I certify that on — 7 - 0 < _ 9 the Notice of Public Hearing on sign(s)
provided by the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development was
0 on the roe located at /.,� 7 N , C' V r so as to be clearly
posted o property rty //
seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property.
/ lel - -1 /
dir Signature
/ Date
(Please return to the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development
before your public hearing to confirm the posting requirements of the ordinance above have been
met.)
Filed
S Hear e
Examin
EXH # D ,. 7'" DOC. Yam
. File # 4�Z g'o2 - l I INDEX 5,Fir!
.# vo
1994
•
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given by the undersigned that a public hearing will be held
by the Yakima City Hearing Examiner to consider a rezone application
submitted by Ms. Jennifer Pearson. The applicant is proposing to rezone a
single parcel from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to (Professional
the al
Ave, Business). The property is located at 3611 Englewood within
limits of Yakima, Washington. This is a non - project rezone.
The public hearing has been set for Wednesday, April 26, 2000 beginning
at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, in the Council Chambers of Yakima City
Hall, 129 North Second Street, Yakima, Washington.
PARCEL # 181328 -22421
Further information regarding this application may be obtained by contacting
Dan Valoff, Associate Planner, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington
- 98901,
or by calling 575 -6163.
Don S. Skone
Planning Manager
Please publish once only on: Thursday, April 6, 2000
Please mail affidavit of publication to:
Account # 11002
City of Yakima Planning Div.
129 N 2nd Street DOC.
Yakima, WA 98901 INDEX
#3`?
1A-Yod ( do
(''' Y'`1 . DEPARTMENT OF COiUNITYAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPNT
r tr.'
Planning Division
F is 129 North Second Street
f
Yakima, Washington 98901 .
., ./ Phone (509) 575 -6183 • Fax (509) 575 -6105
Don Skone, Manager
DATE: April 5, 2000
TO: SEPA Reviewing Agencies ,
Applicant, and Adjoining Property Owners
FROM: Don Skone, Planning Division Manager . _.
SUBJECT: Notice of Application
File No. UAZO RZ #2 -99: EC # 19 -99
NOTICE OF PROPOSAL
On November 15, 1999 the City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic
Development received a rezone application from Ms. Jennifer Pearson to rezone a
single 0.41 acre parcel located at 3611 Englewood Avenue, Assessor's parcel number
181315- 43006, from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to B -1 (Professional Business).
This application is subject to approval with conditions. The application was .
considered complete for processing on April 4, 2000. The complete application is
• available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall,
129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The rezone request requires review under the State Environmental Policy Act. The
City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic Development is lead agency for
this proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). This application is
being reviewed under WAC 197 -11 -340. Enclosed is a copy of the Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS), Environmental Checklist and supporting documents. The
DNS was issued on April 5, 2000 the required twenty (20) day comment period will
end on April 25, 2000. Should you wish to submit written comments or have
concerns related to this proposal, please notify Dan Valoff, Associate Planner (509)
575 -6163. This threshold determination may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner . by
filing a written notice of appeal with the City Planning Division within five days of the
date of threshold determination in accordance with the City of Yakima Municipal Code
6.88.170.
NOTICE OF OPEN RECORD HEARING
An open record public hearing will be held before the Hearing Examiner on
Wednesday April 26, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. in the Yakima City Council Chambers, 129
North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901. Mail your comments on this project to City of
Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development, Planning 129
North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901. Be sure to reference "Jennifer Pearson
Rezone" in your correspondence. The Examiner's recommendation will be forwarded
• to the Yakima City Council for review at a closed record public hearing. If you have
any questions on this proposal call Dan Valoff, Associate Planner at (509) 575 -6163.
Encl.: Site Plan, Narrative, and Vicinity Maps, DNS, Environmental Checklist. Yakima
O. •
INDEX
it 3$
0
WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
APRIL 5, 2000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone of approximately 0.41 acres from existing R -3,
Multi - Family Residential to B -1, Professional Business.
PROPONENT: Jennifer Pearson
LOCATION: 3611 Englewood Avenue, Yakima, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima.
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing the
Environmental Checklist and related information, has determined that the project does
not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an
environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required as provided under RCW
43.21C.030(2c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is
available to the - public on request.
[ ] There is no comment period for this DNS.
[ X ] This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on
this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by
April 25, 2000.
APPEALS: This determination may be appealed pursuant to YMC §6.88.170 to the
Yakima city council, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima WA 98901 in writing no later than
five working days after the end of the comment period. Be prepared to make factual
objections. Contact Dan Valoff, Associate Planner (509) 575 -6163 for more
information.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Don Skone
POSITION / TITLE: Planning Division Manager
TELEPHONE: 509 / 575 -6183
ADDRESS: 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901
DATE: April 5, 2000 SIGNATURE: 5
DOC.
INDEX
#37
t- ae al"5ort r....z..or-ve,
Dep...r Natural Resources
Army Corps 713 Bowers Rd Mr. Greg Griffith
011i Box C-3755 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Div of Archeol & Hist Pres
e, WA 98124 PO Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504
Mr. Paul Donahue
Jon Mulvenon Dept of Soc/Health Service WA State Attorney Gen. Office
Cascade Natural Gas Capital Programs Ofc. Bldg#2, 120 S 3rd St #100
401 N 1st St. MS OB -23B Yakima, WA 98101
Yakima, WA 98901 Olympia, WA 98504
Dept. of Health Mr. Richard Smith
Chamber of Commerce Michelle Vazquez Terrace Heights Sewer Dist
10 N 9th St. 1500 W. 4"' Ave. St. 305 314 N 2nd St
Yakima„ WA 98901 Spokane, WA 99204 Yakima, WA 98901
Dept of Transportation Mr. Bob Young
Mr. Paul Burlingame 2809 Rudkin Road U.S. West
City of Union Gap Union Gap, WA 98903 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304
PO Box 3008 Yakima, WA 98902 .
Union Gap, WA 98903
Environmental Protection Agency Yakima Co. Commissioners
Les Omelas 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Room 416 Courthouse
Clean Air Authority Seattle, WA 98101 Yakima, WA 98901
ilium St., R9 1016
• a; WA 98989 01
Mr. John Daly FAA Yakima Co Health Dist
Dept. of Agriculture 2200 W Washington Art McKuen
406 Gen. Adm Bldg. Yakima, WA 98903 104 North 1st St
Mail Stop AX-41 Yakima, WA 98901
Olympia, WA 98504 .
Interagency Committee Mr. Richard Anderwald
Debbie (Smith Outdoor Recreation Yakima Co-Planning
Dept of Ecology P.O. Box 40917 128 N 2nd St.
15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Olympia, WA 98504 -0917 Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98902
Nob Hill Water Co Mr. Dan Hesse
Department of Ecology, . 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima Co Pub. Works
Environ Review Section Yakima, WA 98908 128 N 2nd St
PO Box 47703 Yakima, WA 98901
Olympia, WA 98504 -7703
Pacific Power Yakima Greenway Foundation
Dept of Emergency Services Dan Olmstead 111 So. 18'" St.
4220 E'Martin Way 1101 N. 16th Ave. Yakima, WA 98901
Olympia, WA 98504 Yakima, WA 98902
0 e Ted Clusing Planning & Com Affairs Agency Mr. Caroll Palmer
. pt. of Fish & Wildlife 9th & Columbia Bldg. Yakama Indian Nation
1701 So. 24" Ave. MS GH -551 . PO Box 151
Yakima, WA 98902 Olympia, WA 98504 Toppenish, WA 98948
DOC.
INDEX
6 '
MATS Planner
YVCOG Mr. Hiram Olney
6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 Yakama Indian Nation
Yakima, WA 98901 P.O. Box 151
Toppenish, WA 98948
Mr. Bill Beckley
Mr. Doug Mayo Yakama Indian Nation
Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Protection Prog.
P.O. Box 151
Toppenish, WA 98948
Federal Aviation Administration
Bureau of Indian Affairs Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner
PO Box 632 Seattle Airports District Office
Toppenish, WA 98948 1601 Lind Ave. S.W.
Renton, WA 98055 -4056
Mr. Marty Miller
Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Office of Farmworker Housing
Yakama Tribal Council 1400 Summitview #203
PO Box 151 Yakima, WA 98902
Toppenish, WA 98948
Watershed Information Center
Bureau of Reclamation Brenda McMurray
PO Box 1749 402 E. Yakima Ave. Suite 534
Yakima, WA 98907 _ Yakima, WA 98901
•
ALWAYS SEND TO
Soil Conservation Dist APPLICANT
Attn: Ray Wondercheck
1606 Perry St Suite F
Yakima, WA 98902
Perry Harvester
Dept. of Fisheries
1701 So. 24 Ave.
Yakima, Wa 98902
Mr. Scott Nicolai
Yakama Indian Nation- Fisheries
P.O. Box 151
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakima School District
Attn: Larry Petry
104 N. 4th Avenue
Yakima, WA 98902
WV School District
Attn: Peter Ansignh
8902 Zier Road DOC.
Yakima, WA 98908 INDEX
#3 �
i . .
., : --PEO-13- • ____-,4. g'f/Cf.._a_ . R, BASIC- INFORMATION-LIST _
- 16: 1-16-99 r -ist: rx-2-99
'-, Parc-ol # Owne .
r Name Owner Address • • .
.. .
.. .
;.= 181315-43003 LUKEHART GARY D & MARY M YAKIMA, WA 98907
...
18131, LUKEHART GARY V ET A L • YAKIMA, WA 98907
1013 LUKEHART GARY AL - YAK: WA t .?090 - 7 • •
...i 1E3131,-4;3006 ALEXANDER E. C.4. • • YAKIMA, WA 96902
16131--43006 • E E•N T . • YAKIMA, WA 96902
18131*-43404 SCHWERDTFEGER ROBERT 0 & MARY YAKIMA, WA 98908 .
:; FIGGS LEO 0 - & ---, J - CUNNINGHAM - - • ____ SEL -9.894-2- _ ._ .. ___________
16121!3-42410 SCHAAKE CORPORA ELLENBURG, WA 98926
18131Z. COMMUNITY DEV 5 , YAKI WA -98902 .
,._
161215 PRENTICE MARIE L " YAKIMA, WA 98902
; 181 HARRIS MICHAEL: YAK • ___ __ ____ __
:1 18131,-43425 RASMUSSEN RICHARI?• & P MCDONALD UNION GAP, WA 96902
18131,-4343 4 COMMUNITY DEVEL Y A K I M A , WA 98902 . .
:---;
18131,-4343, COMMUNITY DEVEL YAKIMA, WA 98902
H -YA-KI-MAT-WA-798902- _
,
• 1E3131 YAK I MA WA 98902
,-43442' COMMUNITY DEVEL .
....,
18131,-4344:3 COMMUNITY DEVEL YAKIMA, WA 96902 - • . -
18131,-43444 NI3R CC1NSTRUCTIt3 . YAKIIvt.A, WA 98908
'- 10 -- NBR - C - ONSTRUC -- T1 - 0 - YAK - 1 - MA WA
.1 1E5131,-434,4
.._, HARRISON ROBERT J BELLEVUE, WA 98007
HARRISON 'ROBERT J BELLEVUE, WA 96007 . .
:,! 1E3131,-43436 HARRISON ROBERT J ?Y. CAROL 5 YAKIMA: WA 98908 -. •
lelova." HARRTSON S YA
:::_ im.322-1.2004 LANG GARY C nt SUSAN P YAKIMA, WA 9'8902.
181322-1200* LYLE ELIZABETH ‘. YAKIMA, WA 96902
,....
H 1E31322-12006 YAKIMA TENNIS C- YAKIMA, WA 96902
. .. ,,
.
• 1E31322-12007 • -- LEONARD C-AMILLA-5 ' • VA -wp,----5 ..., _.
I H 15132'2=1 7200E3 YAKIMA CITY .
YAKIMA, WA 98901
181322-12032 TRENKENSCHUH RICK . & DRUCILLA A • YAKIMA, WA 98902 • ,. . _
'-- 1E31322-12400 DOUGLAS 1J0111\1 - tv.WILLIAM TRUSTE YAKIMA; WA 98902
YAKI - WA - 7'3'8902 -
:,-
. ...,,
1E31322 ; MC KELHEER J 0 :!, VERN/ETA fl YAKIMA, WA 98902
--,
181322-12412 HOLLINGBERY DONALD R E4. KRISTEN K. YAKIMA, WA 98900
'-. 1E31322 DIETZEN MARY M. YAKIMA, WA 9E3902 :
;-- Total Number of Parcels: 24 ..
. .-- : •
.„.; • .
• ' — - —
. . .
,...., . .. • .
:;F .. .
_....
— -• - — .
! • _ .. - - .- - .._ -- - ---
z 0 . .
. • .
' ITS 0
;:2-c,„,›C . ___ • — • . _ ___.----
:----
d.i .
._..,
. .
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
Re: !/t - tzt E C' / -
�P,!hi fir' earns' -
I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application and
Request for Comments. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith;
that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of
300 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on
the mailing list retained �b,Y the Planning ivision, and that said notices were
mailed by me on the �S day of /If ,2000.
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
Christine M. Wilson
•
DOC.
INDEX
# 33
+;
•
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
Re: u 421) ieia `99
. �e h r7, r 4
36 /f E-n j /e wood 4
I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Public Hearing by the
City Hearing Examiner, a true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith;
that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of
300 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on
the mailing _list retained by the Plann Division, and that said notices were
r
mailed by me on the F day of ) i 1 ,2000.
I
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
Christine M. Wilson
III
DOC.
INDEX
# 32_
•
CITY OF YAKIMA
HEARING EXAMINER
AGENDA
Wednesday, April 26, 200() Yakima City Hall
9 :00 am Council Chambers
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. INTRODUCTION
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. KEITH MEERS
Planner Assigned: Bruce Benson
File Number: UAZO CL(3) #2 -00 UAZO ADM ADJ #6 -00
Location: One South 12 Avenue
Request: Expansion of a nonconforming use in a
nonconforming building
B. JENNIFER PEARSON
Planner Assigned: Dan Valoff
File Number: UAZO RZ #2 -99 UAZO EC #19 -99
Location: 3611 Englewood Avenue
Request: Rezone a single parcel from R -3 to B -1
C. JAMIE WALTHER
Planner Assigned: Dan Valoff
File Number: UAZO APPEAL #4 -00
Location: 708 South 60 Avenue
Request: Appeal the denial of CL(2) #3 -00 for a home occupation
beauty shop in the R -1 zoning district
IV. ADJOURNMENT
If you are unable to attend the hearing, you may submit your comments in writing prior to
the hearing. You may also submit written testimony at the hearing.
410
DOC.
INDEX
#31
qt r Y DEPARTMENT OF CC ,IUNITYAND. ECONOMIC DE1/ L4.OP. NT
" + °, Planning Division
f �
V : '_ ' & 129 North Second Street
0 �fI
t Yakima, Washington 98901
Phone (509) 575 -6183 • Fax (509) 575 -6105
Don Skone, Manager
April 4, 2000
John P. Hodkinson, Jr.
Prudential Almon Realty Commercial
4112 Summitview Avenue
Yakima, WA 98908
Re: Determination of Application Completeness - Rezone 3611 Englewood
UAZO RZ # 2 -99; EC #19 -99
Dear John:
The rezone review application by Jennifer Pearson for the property at 3611
Englewood Avenue was received November 15, 1999. The application has been
determined complete as of April 4, 2000. Continued processing of this rezone
application will include, but is not limited to, the following actions: .
1. Notification of adjoining property owners of the public. hearing scheduled for
• Wednesday, Apr leg& 26, 2000, le al notice of public hearing published in the
Yakima Herald Republic, and the posting of the property on this land use
proposal twenty days prior the hearing date;
3. Preparation of a staff report;
4. Public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on April 26th at 9:00 AM in the
City Council Chambers;
5. Recommendation of the rezone application by the Examiner.
6. The Examiner's recommendation will be forwarded to the Yakima City
Council for review at a closed record public hearing to be scheduled.
If Y ou have any questions regarding this matter, give me a call at (509) 575 -6163.
,
Sincerely, .
cp...4 A
•
Dan Valoff
Associate Planner
0 cc: Jennifer Pearson
Yakimi
DOC.
INDEX IF
#3 0
EXHIBIT 3
•
; . :. - u. , f y T• T � t'" . • I� r . •
.'' emu. „, 4 -:=1- c ^,' 't' ► .
e• fi � :.:. .�"" i � : ' � ,M F t.{. 1 r _#... � r , a • '•, P• . v.'''. �.
. • say 1 t t > { } y 3 .. it ^ ""7..7-_, y! 1
., gal, s
`, ° ` 'k i it,' ` Tx - '' v y. . b A + ; S f i r fr e. ''w'`tlll►�_ • _ l�
• � • }Y � Y � +" '' �tR'y �'� r 3 ,.W �z' r I e • • r �• '; l' _
l � ��,t it t � I � � .
w l°1 ' ♦.
�}T j ] t i r +? n a - 4 �s ZT r - �f' �'
:,- % i r' . 5 .,. v t r • ' t. ^ �. Z �' e> l "' , < yr. t _ h 4 .•0 • V •R F C 1 _I ''''
3 '�' - 7 •L' 7 � 1 . 41 r -... 7- it n t t- �� y , a r . ` ♦ y 4 , �j
� r - .h 1 � 4 � / : ` :r 4 r - +'IY��'' 1 s ` _ Y om _ . .e .. � I i _- ,� 1� [ ; y - s »l .. •
t .•4 •a ` , .. < ?'
j 1 i ti F..':,:.r �5`.` . +' M.^,• F . _ ls . f ,` a i . �$ s •. A ,e + y _ �' 8. r �`d �,� :. ° � b :r •
at r 1f -: s�t'��s_S l s ` "t ` ` :tz' a •ic:- x a L i'? 1! 1
..rj _ •: a , ,.tas} y , i y �� 1 -',.; L a v rte . - _ "'i -tS - � c.v. 4 . -.•'' :I • t .., v' ` +- v �r ` p7 r. _t '�rt�sl v . + •� . #... Et7. . - _ w -.-� tL ! l 1 ) t ' L
f t ,, ■ S 1 1 - tF.c iM :Re
: 1040 - � � ' �,: i � • j j ,r I .. - ' . :5 .3 ii ,
y I I d! 7 ` yfi� �' .1
\ r f±� i •._ -i . .3' j i 2�•. tt #� `7S` �; 41 �e rr� ia"i . nk , X t , .' ,-7- Z s mag a C= .7 i . . , ' s l t i is
.
”" i fi ' 1 � i t �' ��� a. I W ;� a 1 :::,/ I I 'X w ' "' • m },. f, , . 11,
or u r <t ! 1 � � , = .--- :_.tc.-, f � - R _ . - ,
1 k < - ''1; l II II - s - ;; y 2 ' { . z Rt ` . .. S . ,s �c - •r:s •�. i.: , 7 .X •
'` y • ? r I ;f •`,. - w I ! i' I .s,- M'1' ` I '} C-. 1 1.r
p
-�.., , c ,.7 :I:' L . W ----. • .p— .,_ .4,�V, ,:E. -
'� t =7 t � .� 3�xn k r .:A j Y' -.' �"' .wl' '�' f � y_..I _ • ^' 4.. ...a �.� o \ _ • .''y` ��' I i :kt ,,t�rr a 'r. , . �, w �,, r , : � I, tr }'` � ,1` { - 9..j r' - I '. . q•� r r� / ' Q c ' . • ' •
' s. . "`� `' g-rl '`;S f `� 31: g � I 1; ' - • 1. 4 ' I f
r-' GY, �,` ,• � . i �,- < §..; �r 1 - �' - � • � + -i�5 •'1 I, 'fi a ._ � i • I : t/
tt r - - I _ _ � � _l,� y w g " ` 4 , � ( + , `^ r' I .. e , '. 1 Y` t
/ _ t _ •-,--.-"'-
. -r Y i X ,- , ••, • 1 k. • `�� L R ` f i dJ , - _ `' e l •
� b ,.' `E •s - S x ,4gg. { � - . ./ a • tg -" . !i':`.' f 't -- � ; �
'it �"` F' 7 ' f � •.l� �
� j B ' 94 1 ; � t a ♦ .e 15�'tt '� ' R ' � . S t � `� ` yal� ..
h
f i ¢$ j I t ry ggy�yQy =�i • tt fl jp il ' r
"-, pi I� _ I 1 r s .k m 'r "�i t' � tf' ` N p Iigl i ce ®i r ` • i i � ,� .
•'•"- 1�`1�Ei I I .. _ ... '�� is �•d>wsss iii . + 1 �7 = I •Y ,N,, P �. ♦,. . • r 7 t, - — L i �:Qir - i ii it •,( •; ! ' '4 ° f a 4 «
1 - ` _, .-. {` y � ��' ;, a _ e 1 ._ . y �, �. -AT I� 41 ' S • . R P11• t 1 ` x t '� s i
.+, e••'''... r"r ..i }j, — !I ���.r 1 ra t' • F a 5S,t-, t r L I 2 I `iF e, N., - • .' , t . y :: n � :
� .. - -..,,. 1. � .L..6z - . ..T. l'...".•:::..." I� ._ �V� -
:7��717 /7� /) [; , 3'e:�..a I " , a ma c- '. a 41.- ` .R:# �,.� - -� a .r - . „ .� y,
� \ \ \, C ,��'_ '0� r •;�sx„+ -se r s... ' ,. fd,Jji " #!�•. � . : � 4 � �
j .. u hf 1 7 4 E C II r \ ,0.- �'s -^� —: -� _ `rte `Li `d ' p ''!`'' 4 c+# • " R . D :. a I L m _ .a . . •
b p
, '.• k t •
CITY OF YAKIMA, • SI�QN S Exam
Scale - 1 in = 300ft
Informations — Date / / 300
FILE NO: UAZO RZ #2 -99 File # � � ° � ���
• 'PLICANT: JENNIFER PEARSON i/ S UbjeCt Property
REQUEST: REZONE A SINGLE PARCEL HOC Zoning Boundary
INDEX
FROM R -3 TO B -1 # a Yakima City Limits •
LOCATION: 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE RZ-2-99 11116 /99
•
UAZO I(Z #2 -99 n SR Suburban Residential
JENNIFER PEARSON i — 1 R -I 3 SSinglTsvo,Fe�mniamilylyR Resirsidential — _
�-+ dential
ONE A SINGLE PARCEL ® R,9 Multi-Family Residential
n a Pra�ianal auriness 1 \
M R -3 TO B -1 a2 Local Business
IN Ha Historical Business
3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE
® .-,.
f.. ScC sma/1 Convenience Center ` , �;
• LCC Large Convenience Center \ ,. .. \ _.
Subject Property . CaD Central autinets � ��
n CBDS can support : - �. L i
City Lim n M 1 tria/ Light lndw 1
® M-2 Heavy Industrial
•
., K, '£
x
° �" r z• } r y : .. 1 ,. r ''•.' d ai ? .rt '' 9 i••••-21, 'x`: ,L
i x i w < it,,,
2
� c Y. .:` A :t
t ; n +.•a is r t
F t I i -' :
t r f i i h a " I .
l.c ,,,i.,,; 7 � d i i
t k ,S's ∎ I Il,' 1Ir r t l �r,11 . t: r ,t — i + t - aa r,nrta .:. • t
= 1 e y M I 1 £ ssk {';Ir' r r ' ; .� '1•V ri
o. , L-+! S I , _ w 1. , 't 1 acr e
•
� - , r a a s -a e"y�";¢ r "..
2 � 1 ly xir ''" yfa�ue, y %'„�Pvs _ �� ta ; + Ilt � .. ��a t t i' . +ss .r
, �.as. � e .,",7. -, 5 0 . [ `� t^ 4 . >, °¢ ` ,- t .4u i r '.J?.. t ..
h �y,. �„° F�pxs r 7ra^''� :�t :i s7 t`rt ,� e
\''�. w r ru Y` r L , tl t 4 C Y �- t , t , "I v Y a"" • a ON
xs, ] J �? f et ' .� su t {a a r I f ?-. yr 1_,'t e
a § Y � � z
. , w.. 5 ? r," t4 i a5 , IP 1 Y 10 { b- .I +xr , a F Wr y
' t` ~i,�+, &' -- ��"_i 'F.�u+k tt 1 ., I`r ,r:` ,i 'r r`;`e�a i� . 4 � 4 :1'
s ...� = 7 '
4 - .!vv - ' ` ° - x __` ., -. .•: - * .,- ++""r,.re'?x?^.a3 -.*' * -.S'_3 > .k ... "5�,.,;+t'} -�"fi .i * 'i�.+z -�' - {•g A
E> ' + � � " S•^ m u "i = i ♦ - + I i
i kr ', a • ' 1' j` i, a 2 `"
`S? 1 t. `s of � l.. � 's �.. ' {{ i a t-t"' n gl•w • ,,�
M me'- I- Fa vi r i I I w i 4
rxF n
_, . M - 4 r f '$ .r F. ;1 , r i �• "
.r . , ^ t j ` `
- -fix �� ry ' " � l - n g t"� A� ° C � " " , •� , � Ei k - I i �`t .a�I�E l' 'fi e it�r d ' c
?.. -,.. � { L t, ^ , X1 . 3 '^,` 2 yy Y C ,4.:, : ' µ` `' y �n: old, 1:+. `w' t `r �..,.a_ .-. O
'° *; . '+ ' •+ .... -u "C ' e " - •-"'.'� , ° �"
• E N G L 'LE''' - a n� �� � � - " asz��x* .
. -,.._- ,, , , ,, A . , -,,,..x.., uyt„ r . .„ ,:. , _ , ,,,.. , , m y 1 , R I
c
y s s � N . k R O O S E
W I ' 447 pa ;l . "
> r ' ,, � .
-..$ • �ll
_ _ --- .. - - -- ' —~ n k -'N
�- - YF- U-_C_- -C-A N A L
•k Lam.,, . 0.
1
• O , >
a
1 C H E Y E 1*
w 0t ,
Scale - l inn = 3= City o f Yakima, Wash : � � „ , t ,, •
Ili. $ '� �;
0 1'50 300 •�- ��
z� November 16, 1999 * .s,.
•
imir.
B-1
A
1
•
1
IN
I
Lamm
,
lin 1
, rims.N
- =----- ________ LE
MI �
1 611411 pil
1
IN
... 41 ■.L■vE.. ■0...19. •43■ "'. — •- V= 'E
‘1111,1111P IIIIIIIIIII Ell
4 ...
kaL j 4 116141111 1 9 1 s ail mom
�' E
all tr: _44
-II .
0
I C H E Y 111.1 1411 . IIMI IIIENIIItaIIIIIIIIIIII 1 -
. CITY OF '�'
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Scale - lin _ 300ft
. Information Services - GIS
FILE NO: UAZO RZ #2 -99 0 Iso 300
APPLICANT: JENNIFER PEARSON
REQUEST: REZONE A SINGLE PARCEL DOC.
E Subject Property
INDEX - - - Zoning Boundary
FROM R -3 TO B -1
LOCATION: 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE # 4,27 ' Yakima City Limits
RZ-2- 9911/16/99
•
0 w
I
1-
O I;rit,_ _
j ' P
%r'r w . r
!r C
: :.'I ►!r� % %%Ii��i /tom 4
Z �.' /I� /�� / � w 12
r Al
N G L C �
i . iv ip, :oil 0, - •■•■ ip ...41 j/ 407:0;;;„ /0 ilinin. :, i.
R O O S E
Y V C CANAL
0
W
>
l C H E Y > •
CITY OF YA
KIMA, WASHINGTON
Information Services - GIS sale - lin = 300h
0 FILE NO: UAZO RZ #2 -99 3 300 APPLICANT: JENNIFER PEARSON 1813154 3 0 0 6
QUEST: REZONE A SINGLE PARCEL DOC.
FROM R -3 TO B -1 INDEX ,
LOCATION: 3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE #
RZ-2- 991I/16/99
• • •
•
L I i I L_ - Yakima
�. _i 1 I Current
. _- - - -- I Zoning B . L2_ 4 . o o • 1 t 2 . Water & Sewer •
W ` I CURRENT ZONP G �- El. — Weer Lane
> i . I - ! I . SR Suburban Residential j . _ 11111111 ` R -I Single-Family Residential \. 4 .,
� /! / 1 /1 /I�r�7s 1 1 '�'/7� t@I ^/ Sewer Lines Lines _ 111 R -2 Two-Family Residential r
3701 111 R -3 Multi -Family Residential
3103
m en .. -.. ._`... _ . I Pro femonal Business '
Z 3701 ® @ -2 Loci easiness
In HB Historical Business / -
el
•
E N G L +- I II -t o sccsmaiCo emenreCenter 1 I 12 . 0 OE �'��, 1.11 _ •�+���Nl'a�ll': 1
Tfj f Y t . I ' !fill ,:41! 1 In LCC Large Convenience Center m , •
3706 r •' _ rill{ • ■ CBD Cenual Business D�slnm ca
S11 6 1 I CBDS CBDSuppon o .
3708 '441‘4„ f 111 :t `I.I M -I Light Minimal (CO b 2 0 Q - �
3702 - r Ill
M.2 Heavy Indus nal \ O O Ni. ,
•
3612
3610 ' � dr ,;
-_ -. -. .. •
_..._ m
FILL NOs UAZO R2 M2 -@@
3602 LI,• 1 APPLICANTr JENNIFER PEARSON
N�
®" "■ Future 1 I * el a �.; , ,.. .w a
,� Land Use ' s " 1 , =r ..; 1i∎ _ .t; - , - Digital
. '1 ti t 1 k :,� �.# v Orthophoto
Z
! 2!E L . , H;i .1 4 Y:C Mosaic o
l
> w 111111 , � 3 d M a �
.w r t . aF
�~ * ? � ` R
m ,
FUTURE LAND USE I,• w • ' . *;, - }� � 9 • = (7 •,� •
\ Q Low Density Readenual 8 . aN► � '
_ Medium Density Residential v • , ; • ' v � ; '. .. ' '3, • T ^ Ill High Density Residential t F 1 � e + 1 Ei h M E Nghborhood Cmmercial D ' ' - ' .�M G L E W O 0 D A V E
Menal Commercial y '
E N •-'
�r I 1 • CBD Core Commercial Ir1. ,W; : ; i , a } -. i n';a w.� 1.`�g • t it r+� CITY OF YAKIMA
�i ��c i r . . -, Industrial ! � Y�.� c�btl� i' . a 'G � \. � �, 4 '.1 - • f ! ; �' • i e n I 'r � MERIT OF COMMUNITY AND
" F - i' I • H I ' • I j ' i �I -:'41047-iii ' ' e ' r l }�" \� 4 ECONOMIC DLVELO ►LM @NT •
i t, t Urban Reserve I 'i R 1 { u 9 - -'1'.4 .. -.
` f1: ,,� I ' I • 1 �' F ; 7 'J ?. � • ; . ` _ 1 z@Na,nsS.ongton 98 .t • s , : ! �� ?j Yakima, w..h'n@mn 31101 DOC=
;ai< ,,: ; ; ' i 1 • L i a'R, g ., ( ; � � 413 Phan.:160e1 @?6 -en3 IND EX
I Nit - _
;gy _ Y .' _ IF S IL . � AP-1.- , FXi { it �p�y _sr M1 � Falc 16091676 -1106 1
• d rt 'f J 1 ^� p( • -- --- rY. , l.' Y " • etr- �' 1 * � w, ; r All maps shown 0 t•n 200n
•
•
• EXHIBIT 2
•
•
AI Tabayoyon
Utilities
CAA54-1 .n er Strom i
CITY YAKIMA
• REQUEST FOR OF COMMENTS
D EVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM (DST)
MEETING OF: -
December 1,1999
TO: •- City of Yakima Development Services Team
FROM: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner
DATE: November 22, 1999
, SUBJECT: DST comments for Pearson rezone request.
PROPOSAL: Rezone a'single parcel from R - 3 to B - 1
36(/
LOCATION: -4 e&' Englewood Avenue
PARCEL NUMBER: 181315- 43006. '
Ms. Jennifer Pearson is requesting to rezone the property in the vicinity of
' Englewood and North 37th & 39th Avenues from R -3 to B -1. This is a non - project
rezone. No construction plans have been submitted with this application.
0
Please review enclosed information and prepare written comme nts regarding this
proposal. A DST meeting will be held on December 1st at 9:00 a.m. for general
discussion. If you cannot attend this meeting, please submit your comments prior
w to the DST, meeting. Should you have any questions, or require additional
information, call me at 575- 6163.
COMMENTS: ...,41.tr 2 Rid/ ' . _Ai# ' .3-6/t * "
/ i / vi •
/ /L/ . /1 i L /.1 /
1` m 61 olLowee(it
/ 10094E
Contact @a tuLe�Lt /Abcncy
0 Hearing Examiner
i do DOC.
E XH # �� Date � INDEX
File # # `f1 1•,,oLV
Water Irrigation DST Comments
'Applicant: Jennifer Pearson Comments Submitted By:
Location: Englewood Ave. between 37th and 39th Ave. Dave Brown Waterllrrigation Engineer 575 -6204
Parcel #: 1 81 31 5 - 43006 Division:
Date: 12/1/1999 Water/Irrigation Division
i
1= primary review
, seoondary review
W i
3
WATER & IRRIGATION
1 2 existing location, size etc. 12" in Englewood
1 2 extension necessary, size No
1 2 2 fire hydrant Several in area
2 1 new public easements No
1 2 LID /connection charges Depends on meter size
2 1 service installation charges Depends on meter size
1 1 public/private system Public
1 2 2 Fireflow calculations 3500 gpm + 1
_ , 2 Irrigation System None
sue I ��� A � Oa W }� '� `
-715 ""n III •1/1999
., ; , DEPART ME
`OFPUBLIC WORKS
. : -" F 2, 01 , Yakima
...,
!
t:, 7 rurtvale B lvc., Washing 0 - , :' - Ph 5 gtoaa, 9��02
�, �. (509)5 f5 -000
.. W ww ei. nakima. zva. ras
•
A
A Pik ® 4 2000
pril 3, 2000
Jennifer Pearson
PLA
24009 NE 75"' Ave Cii Y OF YAKIAIA
Redmond, WA 98053 NNING DIV.
Subject: Notice of Decision for Transportation
for Proposed Rezone of 361 Englewood Ave icy Analysis
Dear Applicant,
Enclosed is the Decision for the Transportation Capacity Analysis ofnon-project r
Ave from R -3 to B -1. The proposed development was considered a Sin Ten Office for the purpose of
of3611 Englewood
1e
g ant Office
this evaluation. The conversion of the existing house to an office would be exempt from
pursuant to the March 20, 2000 changes in the Concurrency ordinance.. Therefore the proposed rezon and Review
conversion of the house would not have a detrimental impact on the capacity of the arterial street system. If
future plans include a larger buildin o e and
g. This review does not include safety or site design issues which will be
addressed at the project review level of zoning and SEPA.
Please review the enclosed report. You may appeal the Findings of this report or request
•
Reconsideration within fifteen (15) days from the date of mailing q Appeal st Administrative
are available at the De g of this Notice. if you forms and procedures
o
Department of C ommunity grid Economic Development, but yu have any questions,
please give me a call at (509)576 -6417.
Sincerely,
C 9O r a---' / a 1P/.1-Y4(cf--- _____
Joan avenport
Sa sing Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
•
Copies: John Hodkinson, Prudential Almon Realty
Don Skone, City Planning
Sandy Cox, City Codes
r
DOC.
0
-
INDEX YAKIMA ,
trawl
# o202_ All
Streets and Traffic Division, Traffic Engineering Services
I illif
ff g er ing S r vi es
1994
City of Yakima, Washington
Traffic Division of Public Works Department
•
Transportation Concurrency Analysis
Date of Review: April 3, 2000
Review Prepared by: Joan Davenport, Supervising Traffic Engineer (576 -6417
Proposed Development: Convert House to Office Via Rezone
Development Parcels: 181315 -43006
Project Site: 3611 Englewood Ave
ITE Land Use Category: 715, Single Tenant Office for PM Peak Hour of Adjoining Street
Calculation: 1.72 trips per 1000 square feet of Gross Floor Area (PM Peak Hour)
2.5* 1.72 = 4.3 PM Peak Hour Trips
Expected PM Peak Hour Trip Generation: 4 PM Peak Hour trips
Summary of Impact:
The applicant proposes to rezone an existing parcel of approximately 0.41 acres from R -3, Multi -
Family Residential to B -1, Professional Office. The parcel contains a home of approximately 2500
square feet in size. While the rezone is a "non- project" rezone, the applicant has indicated the initial
development plans for this site are to convert the existing home to a professional office. However, if
the property is rezoned, other uses would be permitted within the B -1 zoning district.
On March 20, 2000 modifications to the Transportation Concurrency Ordinance (City Ordinance •
2000 -5) took effect which changed the calculation for maximum traffic flows on North 40 Avenue
(as well as other streets within the city). The effect of the newly passed Ordinance is to restore some
traffic capacity for North 40 Avenue for new development. Additionally, projects which generate
less than 10-PM Peak hour trips are now exempt from review under Concurrency.
The conversion of the house to an office would be exempt from Transportation Concurrency
review, pursuant to the Year 2000 modifications of the program. Therefore the rezone as requested
would not have a negative impact upon the carrying capacity of the arterial street system. If future
plans for this site exceed the exempt threshold, concurrency review would be necessary.
This review does not include any site development or safety issues which may be discussed at the
project level review.
DOC. •
INDEX
Transportation Capacity Analysis
Page 1 of 1
- +4\ Lir.r il(1 iY1GlVL Vr t �I[Yl ULV1A f`111VUGI,V[VV/Ytll. UGYI:L , ,x,1111
�'' Planning Division
s' — 129 North Second Street
'aCi�'�' Yakima, Washington 98901
" ",'�Ce 6 ;'
Phone (509) 575 -6183 • Fax (509) 575 -6105
er., -
` Don Skone, Manager
December 9, 1999
Mr. John Hodkinson
Prudential Almon Realty
4112 Summitview Avenue
Yakima, WA 98908
Subject: Pearson Rezone - Traffic Concurrency
File No: UAZO RZ #2 -99
Dear Mr. Hodkinson:
As part of the process for reviewing rezone application for Jennifer Pearson at
3611 Englewood Avenue, a traffic concurrency report is now required. On
December 28, 1998 the City enacted a new Transportation Capacity Management
Code in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act. The
• new code requires a transportation capacity test for most new development as -
well as rezones.
Please review the attached materials, fill out the application form, and submit
the application along with the application fee of $250. The Traffic Concurrency
application will be submitted to the Traffic Engineering Division for review.
Until the above noted item is submitted, this application will be considered
incomplete for further processing. If you have any questions regarding this
matter please give me a call at 575 -6163.
Sincerely,
Dan Valoff
Associate Planner
enclosure
• DOC. Yakima
INDEX
MAmttklQ7
# c2 '1111'
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner
From: Joan Davenport, Supervising Traffic Engineer
Date: December 1, 1999
Subject: Proposed Rezone #2 -99, Jennifer Pearson
(3611 Englewood Ave)
The applicant did not file an application for Transportation Capacity Analysis.
' Rezones are not exempt from the review. Currently, North 40 Avenue between River
Road and Summitview Avenue carries an average of 24,700 to 25,000 vehicle trips per
day. The street is a four lane Principal Arterial Street and is operating at Level of Service
«
Englewood Avenue carries an average of 5050 vehicle trips per day and operates
at Level of Service "A ".
•
DOC. i
INDEX
LJ 1 r L it.i i 1 J Appli
UAZO# 9.2.tc2.-czn Date of Meeting: V '
City of Yakima Divisions:
• 1. Codes - Doug Maples LP Traffic Engineering - Joan Davenport
2. Codes - Sandy Cox 12. Refuse - Nancy Gaudette
3. Codes - Carolyn Belles 13. Parks & Rec. - Denise Nichols
4. Codes - Nancy Danko 14. O.N.D.S. - Bill Cobabe
(D1 Engineering Tech - Kevin Callow 15. Transit - John Haddix
C Water / Irrigation - Dave Brown 16. Police - Mike Vowell
0 Utilities - Bert Tabayoyon • 17. County Planning - Steve Erickson
CY Wastewater - Pete Hobbs 18. County Public Works - Dan Hesse
9. Fire Dept. - Chuck Heath
10. Streets - John Rutter (Always send notice to applicant)
Others:
20. Yakima Tieton Irrigation Dist. - Rick Dieker 470 Camp 4 Rd. 98908
21. Nob Hill Water - Preston Shepherd 6111 Tieton Dr. 98908
22. Yakima County Health Dist - Art McKuen 104 N 1st St. 98901
23. WA State Dept of Ecology - Debbie Smith, 15 W. Yakima Ave. Suite 200 98902
24. No. Yakima Conserv. Dist. - Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St. Suite F 98902
25. Pacific Power & Light Co. - Dan Olmstead 1101 N. 16th Ave. 98902
26. U.S. West - Bob Young 8 S. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 98902
27. Cascade Natural Gas Co. - Jon Mulvenon 401 N. 1st St. 98901
. 28. Yakima School Dist. #7 - Dr. Larry Petry.. 104 N. 4th Ave. 98902
29. West Valley School Dist. #208 Peter Ansingh 8902 Zier Rd. 98908
30. Falcon Cablevision - Kevin Chilcote• 1005 N 16th Ave. 98902
31. Yakima County Clean Air Authority, 6 S. 2nd St., Rm 1016
Les Ornelas Phone: 574 -1410
32. Yakima Waste Systems -Scott Robertson 2812 Terrace Heights Dr. 98901
33. Yakima Greenway Foundation - Cece Vogt, Exec. Dir. 111 So. 18 St. 98901
34. US Post Office - Coleen Ellingsworth 205 W Washington , 98903
35. Yakima County 911 - Wayne Wantland YPD
36. Soil Conservation Dist. -Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St. Suite F Yakima, 98902
37. Dept. of Wildlife - Mr. Ted Clusing 1701 So. 24 Ave. 98902
38. Dept. of Natural Resources - 713 Bowers Rd., Elllensburg, WA 98926
39. Dept. of Transportation - 2809 Rudkin Road, Union Gap, WA 98903
40. Dept. of Fisheries - Perry Harvester P.O. Box 9155 Yakima, WA 98909
41. Yakama Indian Nation, Bill Beckley P.O. Box 151, Toppenish, WA 98948
42. Bob Clem, Airport Manager, 2400 W. Washington Ave. 98903
43. George Inness Y.I.L.A. (Trolleys) 2725 N E 36th, Portland, OR 97232 DOC.
INDEX
# 8
CITY OF YAKIMA
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM (DST)
MEETING OF:
December 1, 1999
TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team
FROM: Dan Valoff, Associate Planner
DATE: November 22, 1999
SUBJECT: DST comments for Pearson rezone request.
PROPOSAL: Rezone a single parcel from R -3 to B -1
LOCATION: 3611 Englewood Avenue
PARCEL NUMBER: 181315 - 43006.
Ms. Jennifer Pearson is requesting to rezone the property in the vicinity of
Englewood and North 37th & 39th Avenues from R -3 to B -1. This is a non - project
rezone. No construction plans have been submitted with this application.
411
Please review enclosed information and prepare written comments regarding this
proposal. A DST meeting will be held on December 1st at 9:00 a.m. for general
discussion. If you cannot attend this meeting, please submit your comments prior
to the DST meeting. Should you have any questions, or require additional
information, call me at 575- 6163.
COMMENTS:
Contact Department /Agency
DOC.
INDEX
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF ‘YAKIMA: Sao t v - 1j
`'` Y LAND USE APPLICATION Nov 1
, r . . : • 4 5 199
r v V : . : \ , ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN'v OF Y
'. ' it 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR PLANNING p V A
t ; � • / f
, " ' �•, YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98901
„ , 0,,,,,,,. �e ,4- / VOICE: (509) 575 -6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6105
il
-s—.,7 .. r '' } ,� ' -- _ `r ' *7 .. & T^ ''' , -s . ti.. �,c ^.art :,. x
:av . , ., ae ...., . .-:' ... ws ,,.a. ....... : - rnw . .p. .. s� nm ^i£ ... ..:t ao o ae +' ,.,.+:�. ., .....cSacc..u .r...,,. a. .v.... ...W.a. .:— ...hm,,...1,, _ ,,,, .tai...
r
Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the
accompanying instructions.
This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CERTIFICATION are on this page. PART
II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember
to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an
application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable.
1. APPLICANT NAME JENNIFER PEARSON
2. APPLICANT ADDRESS STR NE 75TH ST CITY RFDMnNn
AND PHONE NUMBER STATE WA ZIP 98053 PHONE ( 4 2 5 898 MESSAGE ( )
3. APPLICANT'S INTEREST CHECK ❑ OWNER Di OWNER REPRESENTATIVE
IN PROPERTY ONE ❑ CONTRACT PURCHASER ❑ OTHER
4. PROPERTY OWNER NAME EDMOND G. ALEXANDER
(IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT)
5. PROPERTY OWNER'S STREET41 00 W ENGLEWWOD AVE #349 CITY
YAKTMA
ID DRESS AND PHONE STATE ZIP PHONE ( ) MESSAGE ( )
THER THAN APPLICANT) WA 98908 5 0 9 972-9113
. SESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1 81 31 543006
7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
R -3
8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
3611 ENGLEWOOD AVENUE
9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Class (2) U Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation
❑ Classl(3) Use ' Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Short Plat Exemption
121. Rezone ❑ Appeal ❑ Shoreline
❑ Variance ❑ Nonconforming Structure/Use ❑ Utility Easement Release
❑ Home Occupation ❑ Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner
❑ Administrative Adjustment ❑ Short Plat c c ❑ Other
F r✓' L . � � � 'u " � a £ � X6 1/ � 7 . ; . .
` ` 7 ut . \ " f .- w... yn; ... r ........
....- w.,.. .....uww.,.. a... - �. . . i«+ i. ...,.. < ._.._v.......u...au v n -. ..w. a .a.ow.u..n v .. -...+. ?.e ..A .,..w,..w .. +.r.T x ° "�"'
10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS
11. I certify that the information on this application and the required attachments are true and co ect to the best ofowledge.
-7---- 11- 1oy�'ing Examiner
1., SIGNATURE ` /.) D?T D e t / /c,
ed 9 -98 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY Q9 -
l 7)(/ I FILE IV A + FII@ # �� ( "
iR C BY AMOUNT REC NI HEARING DATE
P DATE FE,,,,F PAID 1 I - T 1 /2 1 , DOC.
,(l y � / ` INDEX
O Y:1 �rr 1V1L1\ 111L. 011. 1L1\..Al1Vi♦ 1 V1 \. ..,, v" V C L i t
r��� r l
_.. REZONE N0V 157999
CITY OF YAKIMA
PLANN
s'6, f,`��QYA- satyr G DIV.
��, OkxT£a
CHAPTER 15.23, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZ
e� g•� �f� „- � t�� 'gin a
r 1 45 q � +, ,i
�� .� � �.. �.���
','� .. c: �* :. w, ...a1. 'L'::Z > ..�.,.s ^3 >,....r.
1. REQUEST:
(I, we) the property owner(s) request that the following described property be rezoned:
From R— 3 To B -1
2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (Attach if lengthy) ATTACHED
3. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
(I, we) certify that (I, we) are the owner(s) of record of all of the above described property:
r /
4 _ ' � _s (OWNER(S) SI ATURE)
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF YAKIMA )
On this day personally appeared before me 5 (r , r y i known to me to be the
individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they are the
owner(s) of the property requested to be rezoned, have read the application and know the contents thereof, and believe
same to be true.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this / day of A.20 sf P_ in b k ,19 99.
0313,00
ryY �q °.. fr; p (� $,� �. � o i � � ��— '"`��” � ^'"�' x �`�'..�� st�'"S•"'m�' L _ `os> e. -�,
c + r rss- E.3,s-'.�j�f��T 3'Y,e. T..s : . p w � "�`"' 'b..S.. .+..w...:.3 ;....kwvvw,:.h.: ....,.......w,t.n....4�e: ,t w3ru F S C.1.:'SC.J�XAa.;.' 3 i �. S.3Y. d i. i:s �...»•. M4..w. ......., ,., .............w.
4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A properly completed Environmental Checklist is mandated by the Washington State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a rezone request. Checklists should be obtained from the Planning Division.
5. WRIFIEN NARRATIVE thoroughly answers the following questions in as much detail as possible:
A. Is the requested zoning change suitable with the property in question (subject property)? How so?
B. How is the rezone request in compliance with and/or how does the request deviate from the 1997 Yakima Urban Area
Comprehensive Plan as amended?
C. Are there adequate public facilities, such as traffic capacity, sewer service,potable water, storm water and other public
services and infrastructure existing on and around the subject property? Are the existing public facilities capable of
supporting the most intensive use of the new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are going to be
implemented to address any short falls in public services that may exist?
D. Is the proposed zone change and associated land uses changes compatible with the existing neighboring uses? What
mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as site screening,buffering building design, open space
traffic flow alternation, etc.? _
E. Is there a public need for the proposed change?
6. SPECIFIC PROJECT If this request is for a specific project please include the following:
A. Written project description including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business
describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operatio
B. Site Plan (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist)
Note: All submitted information will be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner along with your application and will become part DOG.public hearing record.
Clear, comprehensive and accurate detail of the information is in the best interest of the applicant. INDEX
`Revised 9 -98 /%5
5. WRITTEN NARRATIVE
• A. The requested zoning change is suitable with the subject property. The surrounding property is
all zoned B -1. There are only two other single family residences on the block and those properties
are both zoned B -1. The remainder of the surrounding property is being developed for commercial
purposes. Rezoning this property to B -1 will allow uniform development of the block in the future.
B. Although the rezone request technically deviates from the Comprehensive Plan, due to the Plan's
conformity to the City's zoning, the City had previously proposed changing the subject property to
B -1 but the property owner opted to retain the R -3 rating. Changing the zoning to B -1 now would
actually meet the original intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
C. There are adequate existing public facilities to support the most intensive possible use of the
requested zone. As stated, the surrounding property is zoned B -1 and there have been new roads and
sewers installed to meet the needs of the changing area. In fact, the requested zone change will
provide improved access to adjoining properties and allow for more uniform use of the public
services that are in place.
D. This change will make the subject property more compatible with the neighboring uses because
the adjoining properties are already zoned B -1. The current owner is not planning any development
for the property so there will be no immediate change in the land use.
E. The public need for this zone change is to make the property conform to the City' s original plan
• to make the property B -1 commercial property. By making the property conform with the adjoining
properties, the future development of the area will be uniform. This will benefit the public by
creating properly segregated land uses and avoiding residences in the middle of commercial districts.
RECEIVED .
NOV 1 5 1999
CITY OF YAKIMA
PLANNING DIV.
® DOC.
INDEX
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE SOUTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE III
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH,
RANGE 18 EWM EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO YAKIMA
COUNTY FOR A ROAD, RECORDED IN VOLUME 66 OF DEEDS PAGE 75, RECORDS OF
YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
RECEIVED
NO V 1 5 7999
CITY OF YAKIMA
PLANNING DIV.
DOC.
INDEX
# /3
16 .00
•
1
.. _._.
1 . 43409 - _ k * y M - } � t L:� ���.�. tee to . dim otbsi b
.77
My 43442 v v MM A~ A
5 4344 3 ' y'� A ��1 14 ,���r
4l 44� sr
L V EW WES '� thetkie fit,
b 3446 l ,� . �A 4
hM v 0
43470 ,; `►
.76 PARK- CONDO D Midis
N
6 CARRIAGE _ . ..
3 39th AVE
cia
43005 >
.11 2 ,.O Q 44 36
43405 43003 43404 y . 2 2
.68 .5 430 . 9 6
. 43004 a0 - 4
1 '' .22
"
92 -90 J z 4 93 -62
ENGL EWOOD
4
13/8.54
• DOC.
INDEX
# /.2—
i 1 ,;_,. 16 , Ii ii..„. 0 6 1■ Ne
4
432 434 42 1..
v
5 tr 4244 3 0 i 6 iet I
N t -7 10 ii)
, V
11 V III
2 i • im Ir.
w U w cis 3421 .._.
WES tr 4 3 4 4 4 le
41424
Ca ilik■ C.II
6 CARRIAGE PARK-- CONDO
AVE
F im
tr 7
43005 >
. . 1 •
J 01;
43 003
, : ,: - :, ,
, .
43404
. 5 1 43006 9 6
' ::':: . 4-9
. rs--
43004 '
40-•;: ., * : r)
. 2 2
• ,,: 1. ;: :::.: 0 92 -90
, t L, , •], 2 ,, v ,
dli
EN
4
, • ■
/jilt. 54
DOC. 0
INDEX
•
1 y-- s
1 4 :- " :: t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST No V
:.: 1 5 7999
y ''''I",- 1 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) ca y OF y
�,� • .,- (AS TAKEN FROM RCW 197 -11 -960) PL A NNp, ttA
"'..° CHAPTER 6.88, YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE (YMC)
f„ ,„ a ., n �? '*>a sY+- I a t i . .Mt q a y � ��'F �a . \ '2 c11
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the
environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be
prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of
this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce
or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
& e �p , - ., � � ''� ` � 'De;a y, ! 2� {Eh Y"�u�f �3 >. 6,1 7777- x� J.. a. �,a �:, u�� t A�� ��� �� "� �`�. ���c. T��.
,Ts- :.,} ° . W " -,,,- r --2 ,� 3a`.� s h y ,.-: .. ,.,..., - `; ":te a r .r 1 � .>,. �� ' lr :,1,11 <.a� �a �`> . ..S:x:.y,, •..�`,;, &,
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental
agencies'use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring
preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descrip-
tion you can. .
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts.
If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not
apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or
•fferent parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmen-
r ffects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
;b,� z' � a i'� �' ..�'> F � s �•� R��Y.. "a � \ ad •'A,� �'a`.s�^�� a?,+��,�a'"S'��` s`" . �\�i.�:� :
1 Y �y�- M, :.., '' ' kl S • n 9 � 3 z4 * . im ,,
y � k EZ S �T� ' L.?it�:a �"`ti� +a� .,..�
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD-
DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
i .:� F = " � s <� 3 {R� i yy � � � v v im, ;.. •: ; e c �a. �• �
l ea x I a... ? t g 5 Ta V1),! :1 1 k, f t �. 3 `sz, , a, .�,°� esII
�`: ...: �,"'°'���y' >..*d€<" <= . � :�:a -:o ti ���� -' � ....,».'�a�a"�'•.',.. � ,� a;.w arc. .,t•w��ss �. ..,. .c -., � M��:...:v • .....w,:,1._,s
1. NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (if applicable) DOES NOT APPLY
2. APPLICANT'S NAME & PHONE # JENNIFER PEARSON ( 425) 898 -9853
3. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 24009 NE 75TH ST, REDMOND, WA 98053
11
4. CONTACT PERSON & PHONE # JENNIFER PEARSON ( 425) 898 -9853
5. AGENCY REQUESTING CHECKLIST
6. DATE THE CHECKLIST WAS PREPARED NOVEMBER 10 , 1999
' OPOSED TIMING OR SCHEDULE (Including phasing, if applicable) DOES NOT APPLY
DOC. .
INDEX
Revised 10 -98 / page 1 of 10
I BACKGROUND QUESTIONS (Attactn ►t Lengtny)
1. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?
If yes, explain.
NO
2. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to
this proposal.
DOES NOT APPLY
3. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the
property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NO
4. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
REZONE APPROVAL
5. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific informa-
tion on project description.)
THIS IS FOR A REZONE OF THE PROPERTY ONLY. THERE ARE NO PLANS TO CHANGE
ANY PHYSICAL ASPECT OF THE PROPERTY.
6. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro-
posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur
over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map,
and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
3611 ENGLEWOOD AVE, YAKIMA, WA
THE SOUTH 200 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH,
RANGE 18 EWM, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF
DOC.
•
INDEX
# q
page 2 of 19/
C
x s. n $; 3' ni.. r:� "� H '.Ra'. - ,� r x — . ¢ .._. _ °i :Y,a sxt.'. ate e 1t c'" ::$ 7^^l^G ..:
z $ .?a.?mF,',3'.xx -es..Y ...`�yec�.'`A. , r e'o �.," ,R :S4»t �• \ � Q
" Space Reserved for Agency
1.Earth Comments
• . General description of the site ( \✓ one):
❑ Flat ❑ rolling ❑ hilly ❑ steep slopes ❑ mountainous
[23 other GENTLE SLOPE
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
2%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
' peat, `muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
ORDINARY SOIL (DIRT)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
NO
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
DOES NOT APPLY
. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use'? If so, generally
describe.
DOES NOT APPLY
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
DOES NOT APPLY
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
DOES NOT APPLY
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
autombile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
DOES NOT APPLY
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
DOES NOT APPLY
DOC.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: INDEX
DOES NOT APPLY # O
page 3of10
3.Water Space Reserved for Agency
Comments
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (in
cluding year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river
it flows into.
NO
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
DOES NOT APPLY
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or re
moved from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would
be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
DOES NOT APPLY
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give gen
eral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
DOES NOT APPLY
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
NO
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NO
b. Ground:
I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NO
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, contain
ing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of
thesystem, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to
serve.
DOES NOT APPLY
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection DOC.
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? INDEX
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. #
DOES NOT APPLY
page 4of 19/
2) Could waste materials enter ground L._ surface waters? If so, generally de Space Reserved for Agency 1
scribe. Comments
DOES NOT APPLY
. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water im
0
pacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY .
4. Plants
a. Check (s/) types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: ❑ alder ❑ maple ❑ aspen ® other FRUIT
evergreen tree: ❑ fir Ei cedar ❑ pine ❑ other
® shrubs
® grass .
❑ pasture crop or grain
wet soil plants: 0 cattail ❑buttercup ❑bullrush 0 skunk cabbage
❑ other .
❑ water plants: 0 water lily ❑ eelgrass ❑milfoil Pother
❑ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
NONE
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or en
hance vegetation on the site, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
5. Animals
a. Check ( ✓) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
1) birds: ❑ hawk ❑ heron ❑ eagle ❑ songbirds
❑ other
2) mammals: ❑ deer ❑ bear - ❑ elk ❑ beaver "
❑ other
3) fish: ❑ bass ❑ salmon ❑ trout ❑ herring ❑shellfish
❑ other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
C . Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. DOC.
NO INDEX
d. Proposed, measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: # 6
DOES NOT APPLY page 5 of 19/
Space Reserved for Agency
6. Energy and Natural Resources
Comments
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
HOME IS CURRENTLY UTILIZING ELECTRICITY AND OIL HEAT
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
NO
c: What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this pro
posal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemi
cals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as -a result
of this proposal? If so, describe.
NO
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
DOES NOT APPLY
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,
if any:
b. N
DQFoiS se NOT APPLY
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for ex
ample: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
DOES NOT APPLY
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
DOES NOT APPLY
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
SITE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE; ADJACENT: RESIDENTIAL &
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. COMMERCIAL
NO
c. Describe any structures on the site.
ONE STORY HOME: 1440 SQ FT MAIN FLOOR; 569 SQ FT BASEMENT
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? DOC.
NO INDEX
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? # S
R -3
page 6 of 10j
i _—
pace Reserved for Agency ■
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Comments
MULTI — FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
4111DOES NOT APPLY
Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If
so specify. -
NO
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
1 -3
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
0
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: .
DOES NOT APPLY
1 . Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and pro
jected land uses and plans, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing.
ONE EXISTING HOME, MIDDLE INCOME
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low- income housing.
• 0 :
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
I0. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed?
DOES NOT APPLY
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed
measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
11. Light and Glare .
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
DOES NOT APPLY
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
DOES NOT APPLY
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposa
DOES NOT APP DOC.
W . Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any INDEX
P
DOES NOT APPLY #
page 7 of 101
r
12. Recreation Space Reserved for Agency
Comments
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vi-
cinity?
DOES NOT APPLY
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
DOES NOT APPLY
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recre-
ation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
NO
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scien
tific, or cultural importantknown to be on or next to the site.
DOES NOT APPLY
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
ENGLEWOOD AVENUE, ACCESS THROUGH EXISTING DRIVEWAY
b. Is site currently serviced by public transit? If not, what is the approximate dis
tame to the nearest transit stop?
ONE BLOCK
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
DOES NOT APPLY
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
NO
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air trans
portation? If so, generally describe.
NO
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. DOC.
•
DOES NOT APPLY INDEX
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY page 8 of 19,
X 15. Public Services pace Reserved for Agency
Comments
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
otection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe:
0
NO
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity
which might be needed.
DOES NOT APPLY
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site electricity, natural gas, 6ats
refuse service telephone sanitary sewer, eptic system of er.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
DOES NOT APPLY
a
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make its decision.
Signature, ;4'
, t_ -____----- Date Submitted: /I
t:�N'- .. "•'..:' . �r1�'. :� µ "� a� , -- tir . : Y: ..�s m•x,.a.'e,..xu..v. .�'v.H��'��y -'M .;�, w .t. s. � , r.. ... .....:
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented.
,k; : , : g i r :. � .0 , 'ta'ky ski r u N .c 3 ` xz :, "3° . 'c: r ,, ._ , -,r- ' 3z - -, _74'"�' : >„k �, „ 77
., . ` s »i
'„ fi wz �;. ti `• S �5:'3� £� �� . ,. a fi�Fr?rE �1'la � -A - ..-, .TN�. S�? ="1-Lazs;: auS.:.. u: is ,:t.:a„wv,.,,w .............
Space Reserved for Agency
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; Comments
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
DOES NOT APPLY
DOC. •
INDEX
# .2-
page 9 of 10/
Space Reserved for Agency 1
Comments
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
U
DOES NOT APPLY
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
4 11 1
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
DOES NOT APPLY
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
DOES NOT APPLY
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
DOES NOT APPLY
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether
III
it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
DOES NOT APPLY
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
DOES NOT APPLY
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws
or requirements for the protection of the environment.
•
DOES NOT APPLY
DOC,
INDEX
page 10 of 10j
►\