HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-001 Relating to safety of airport operations at the Yakima Air Terminal and regulating the height of objects in the ORDINANCE NO. 2000-n 1
AN ORDINANCE relating to safe and efficient airport operations at Yakima Air
Terminal - McAllister Field, and, with limited exceptions,
prohibiting construction of any structures, facilities or
improvements within the Building Restriction Line shown on the
,Yakima Air Terminal - McAllister Field Airport Layout Plan
approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, and adding a
new chapter and section to Title 6 of the Yakima Municipal Code.
WHEREAS, the Yakima Air Terminal - McAllister Field ( "the "Airport ") is within the
territorial jurisdiction of the City of Yakima, and
WHEREAS, by agreement authorized by chapter 14.08 of the Revised Code of
Washington, the City of Yakima and Yakima County jointly own and operate the
Airport, and
WHEREAS, the Airport has been, and may be further, assisted financially by the United
States Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), and
WHEREAS, FAA financial assistance is conditioned on commiluient by the owners of
the Airport, "to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the
airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including
landing and takeoff of aircraft," and
WHEREAS, the FAA generally applies its regulations to achieve safe airport operations
partly by reviewing and approving airport layout plans, and the FAA has specifically
reviewed and approved the Airport Layout Plan for the Airport, and
WHEREAS, structures and facilities associated with an abandoned and deteriorated
fish hatchery near the eastern end of the main runway at the Airport are located within
the Building Restriction Line shown on the Airport Layout Plan, and
WHEREAS, by letter dated August 14, 1998, the Supervisor of the Washington Section
of the FAA stated the FAA's position that "portions of the fish hatchery fall within the
runway safety area (RSA), object free area (OFA), primary surface, and building
restriction line (BRL) of your primary ILS runway," "poses many safety concerns," and
that the abandoned and deteriorated fish hatchery, "does not comply with FAA
regulations, standards, grant assurances, and policies," and
WHEREAS, by the same letter, the Supervisor of the Washington Section of the FAA
also asserted that The airport also has the obligation, to the maximum extent possible,
to restrict the use of the fish hatchery property to uses compatible with normal airport
operations and to prevent the establishment or creation of any additional hazards," and
WHEREAS, the fish hatchery has been abandoned and not used since 1994, and the
structures there have deteriorated substantially, and
Page 1 of 2
i
WHEREAS, the abandoned and deteriorated structures on the fish hatchery property
endanger airport operations, and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare that all
hazards to air navigation at the Airport be minimized and that no new hazards be
created, and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Yakima to protect the community's
investment in the Airport by prohibiting any and all construction work on any
structures, facilities or improvements within the building restriction line shown on the
Airport Layout Plan approved by the FAA, now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA,
WASHINGTON:
Section 1. A new chapter and section are added to Title 6 of the Yakima Municipal
Code to read as follows:
Chapter 6.33 Airport Safety
6.33.010 Construction within Airport Layout Plan Building Restriction Line.
Construction of any structures, facilities or improvements within the Building
Restriction Line shown on the Yakima Air Terminal - McAllister Field Airport
Layout Plan approved by the Federal Aviation Administration ( "FAA ") is
prohibited, except that construction of structures, facilities or improvements
which directly support air navigation or airport operations and which are
specifically approved by the Federal Aviation Administration shall be permitted.
The Airport Layout Plan ( "ALP ") most recently approved by the FAA is
incorporated herein by reference, and as different ALPs may be subsequently
approved by the FAA, the most recently approved ALP shall supercede the
previously approved ALP for purposes of this ordinance.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY'HE CITY COUNCIL at a regular meeting and signed and
approved this a day of 3 y , 2000.
/
ary Place, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publication Date: I — Q oro Effective Date: c2 '
C: \word \airport \y \brl ord2.doc Last printed 01/18/0012:31 PM
Page 2 of 2
\ I
YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL
McALLISTER FIELD
2400 West Washington Ave. • Yakima, Washington 98903 • (509) 575 -6149 • (509) 575 -6185 Fax
June 24, 1999
Yakima City Council . Yakima County Commission
129 North 2 Street 128 North 2 Street
Yakima, Washington 98901 Yakima, Washington 98901
Dear Council and Commission:
In order to ensure compliance with the assurances included in each Federal
. Aviation Administration Grant, we respectfully request that the City and County
• . jointly act to prohibit any building or development which does not comply with
FAA regulations. We would further suggest that any development which
potentially conflicts with FAA regulations, be referred to the FAA for comment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Bill Elkins
Chairman
•
•
r
12 -08 -1999 5:45PM FROM YAKIMA AIRPORT 509 575 6185 P. 1
•
YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL
McALLISTER FIELD
2400 West Washington Ave. - Yakima, Washington 98903 • (509) 575 -6149 - [509) 5756185 Fax
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 8, 1999 j� ) •-5 ( , . 6 Lp `7/L
To: Don Skone, City of Yakima Planning Department
From: Jerry G. Kilpatrick, Airport Supervisor
Subject: Airport Zoning Issues
The Yakima Air Terminal, on behalf of the City of Yakima and Yakima County, accepts Federal funds from thc
• Federal Aviation Administration's Airport Improvement Program (AIP) on an annual basis. Upon acceptance of
each AIP Grant, the City and County of Yakima are required by the Federal Government to ratify the AIP
Application For Federal Assistance (which is submitted to the FAA by thc Airport), ra , to adopt the Standard
DOT Title VI Assurances that are attached to the Application. The Assurances contractually bind the City and
County to certain standards as mandated by Federal Government.
•
Appendix 1 of the Assurances outlines certain obligations and conditions that thc "sponsor" (City and County)
• must adhere as a condition of accepting the Grant.
Assurance No. 20, Ha and Removal and Mitigation states "It (the sponsor) will take appropriate action to assure
that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including
established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating,
marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing tjre establishment or
creation offuture airport hazards."
Assurance No. 21, Compatible Land Use states "11 (the sponsor) will take appropriate action, including the
adoption of zoning laws, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate
vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and
takeoff of aircraft. "
In order to determine the standards that the sponsor is required to meet in carrying out these assurances, FAA.
provides ample documentation. The most pertinent are the FAA Advisory Circulars (AC) and 14 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 139, Airport Certification.
As an example AC 150 /5300 -13, Airport Design, establishes dimensional criteria for airport protection surfaces
such as: Building Restriction Lines (1500' wide centered on runway centerline); Runway Safety Area (500' wide
centered on runway centerline and extending 1000' beyond the end of the runway); Runway Primary Surface (1000'
wide centered on runway centerline and extending 200' beyond the end of the runway); etc.
The change in zoning requested by the Airport is required to protect these areas by not allowing construction or
changes in land use that would compromise the safety of aviation. Such changes, if they are allowed to happen and
end up having an adverse affect on aviation safety, would be a direct violation of the City's and County's
contractual obligation to the Federal Government. The FAA has enforcement power that can be quite severe.
If you need access to any of the Advisory Circulars, they can be down loaded from FAA's websitc, or, you can
contact me at the airport and I will get you copies of what ever you need.
• 1111
•
•
.t ,J5, =tom U.S. Departm' ..
;, .. ;�, of Transporta_...i Seat. _Airports District Office
411 I !
-I ,,;„„,,,„ 'g0l li:- 1 Federal Aviation 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W., Suite 250 • \l' , a <_ ;
, ,,; Administration Renton, Washington 98055 -4056
August 14, 1998
Mr. Bob Clem
Airport Manager
Yakima International Airport
2400 West Washington Ave.
Yakima, WA 98903
Dear Mr. Clem:
This is in response to your August 12, 1998, letter regarding the abandoned fish hatchery on
the East Side of the Airport Property. As you are aware, the fish hatchery poses many safety
concerns to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Portions of the hatchery fall within
the runway safety area (RSA), object free area (OFA), primary surface, and building
restriction line (BRL) of your primary ILS runway.
BACKGROUND
ID Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 139: The Yakima International Airport is a
certificated airport under FAR Part 139. With respect to RSA's, FAR Part 139 states: •
a. To the extent practicable, each certificate holder shall provide and maintain for
each runway and taxiway which is available for air carrier use- -
(1) If the runway or taxiway had a ....
(2) If construction, reconstruction, or significant expansion of the runway or
taxiway began-on or after January 1, 1988, a safety area which confoiins to the dimensions
acceptable to the Administrator at the time construction, reconstruction, or expansion began.
b. Each certificate holder shall maintain its safety areas as follows:
(1) Each safety area shall be cleared and graded, and have no potentially
hazardous ruts, humps, depressions, or other surface variations.
(2) Each safety area shall be drained by grading or storm sewers to prevent
water accumulation.
(3) Each safety area shall be capable under dry conditions of supporting snow
• removal equipment, and aircraft rescue and firefighting equipment, and supporting the
occasional passage of aircraft without causing major damage to the aircraft.
2 `
(4) No object may be located in any safety area, except for objects that need to
be located in a safety area because of their function. These objects shall be constructed, to the
extent practical, on frangible mounted structures of the lowest practical height with the
frangible point no higher than 3 inches above grade.
RSA Design Standards and Policy: The FAA has placed a high priority on developing
projects to correct non- standard safety areas. For airport projects receiving Federal grant -in-
aid assistance the use of our design standards is mandatory. It is also our policy that if a non -
standard safety area exists at a certificated airport, such as Yakima's, declared distances will
be required to correct the situation when: (1) Construction, reconstruction, or significant
expansion of the runway began after 1/1/88 (which applies to Yakima), and (2) correction of
the safety area is not feasible or will occur after 1/1/99.
Instrument Approach Procedures: Also, for a runway to have an authorized instrument
approach procedure, and to the extent practicable, the airport must meet certain landing
surface requirements. This includes meeting the RSA standard.
OFA Standard: The fish hatchery is also in the OFA. The OFA requires clearing the area of
above ground objects protruding above the runway safety area edge elevation.
FAR Part 77: FAR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace establishes the standards
for determining obstructions to air navigation. The primary surface is a surface longitudinally
centered on the runway and extends 200 feet beyond each end of the runway and is 1000 feet
wide. The transitional surface extends outward and upward at right angles to the runway
centerline and the runway centerline extended at a slope of 7 to 1 from the sides of the
primary surface and from the sides of the approach surfaces. Portions of the fish hatchery
penetrates both the primary and transitional surfaces, and are therefore obstructions to air
navigation. •
Grant Assurances: Also, as we have discussed previously, as a condition of receiving
Federal funds, sponsors assume certain obligations pertaining to the operation, use, and
maintenance of their airport. These obligations are embodied in the application for Federal
assistance as sponsor's assurances and become a part of the grant offer, and bind the grant
recipient upon acceptance.
There are two grant assurances that specifically apply to the fish hatchery property. They are:
a. (20) Hazard Removal and Mitigation. It will take appropriate action to assure
that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the
airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and
protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating
existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport
hazards.
b. (21) Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, including the
110
adoption of zoning laws, to the extent reasonable, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in
the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport
s
,t 3
• operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise
• compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use,
within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the
noise compatibility program measures upon which Federal funds have been expended.
Avigation and Hazard Easement: It is our understanding that the City of Yakima has an
Avigation and Hazard Easement over the fish hatchery property which significantly restricts
the use of the property. It is clear that no structures can be constructed which will penetrate
the primary, approach, or transitional surfaces. This means that nothing can be constructed at
all in the primary surface nor can anything be constructed to penetrate a surface which
extends at a, slope of 7 to 1 from the sides of the primary surface and from the sides of the
approach surfaces. Given this, there is only a small triangle of land that might be developable
and it appears that the airport does have a significant amount of control over the property. It
also appears that because the fish hatchery's structures and improvements have been
abandoned and have deteriorated, and because much of the land is unimprovable, the value of
the property would be minimal.
POSITION
Given that the fish hatchery does not comply with FAA regulations, standards, grant
assurances, and policies and the fact that the fish hatchery is abandoned, the airport has an
0 obligation to take action necessary to meet the RSA and OFA design standards and FAR Part
77 or be prepared to shorten the runway's length to meet the standards by applying declared
distances. The airport also has the obligation, to the maximum extent possible, to restrict the
use of the fish hatchery property to uses compatible with noiuial airport operations and to
prevent the establishment or creation of any additional hazards.
Since the city and county own the airport, have zoning authority, and already own an existing
Avigation and Hazard Easement, we believe there are already adequate controls in place to
allow the city and county to bring the fish hatchery property into compliance with our
regulations, . standards, grant assurances, and policies.
If there are any questions regarding our position on the fish hatchery, please call me at 425-
227 -2657. For your information however, I will be on vacation from August 17 through
September 8, 1998. If you would like to discuss this with someone in the meantime, please
call Paul Johnson at 425 -227 -2655.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Key
III Supervisor, Washington Section
,.
A I .
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLA N r
'
\ ROAD ELEV. 1118 _'� �' t 4- H ''
ze CLEAR M ODIFICATIONS TO STANDARDS I,. ! � .maw 4 LE D LEGEND BUILDING LEGEND
'1 ' 1 AMP
N I ���,v,��,,• 3 BUILDINGS 1 ASR -9 RADA FACIL 3 AIR CARRIER TERMINAL R
\
ROAD ELEV 11 2' / g� 4 ��,(�J f I.,Qi / EXISTING ULTIMATE 14 YAKIMA FIRE STATION 4
38' CLEAR FISH HATCHERY EXTENDS 70 FEET INTO THE / � yy � - igi & - PAVED ROADS 2 FBO / HANGAR FACILITY (LEASED) I
\ - F ISH HA 27 SAFETY N (EXISTING FEEINTO CONDITION) C $' �ft.� �� - — — — — — _ FACIU� 15 U.S. WEATHER BUREAU / FAA MAINT.
�� � DIRT ROADS 3 OFFICE (LEASED)
\ rq FISH HATCHERY EXTENDS 200 FEET INTO THE - -- - - --- t \ "�!W�� � '3, BUILD • - CREEKS • MCALLJSTER'S AVIATION (FeO) 16 AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
- RUNWAY 27 OFA. (EXISTING CONDITION) (I.'''' - �v 5 CUBCRAFTERS (LEASED)
� I �T: �� 1 e �,' n8 _ te r AIRP •'7 PROPERA' PROPERTY BOUNDFF.Y 11 OFFICE LEASED
\ REDUCES BY 750 FEET RUNWAY 27 SAFETY AREA � � II. 0V
\ ^ \ \ DUE TO SOUTH 16TH AYE (EKISTI CONDITION) -" Y . l C `'��. l o46.� �� - — _eft__ _ — BUILD C RESTRICT. LINE 6 FBO/HANGAR FACILITY (LEASED) 18 BLAZE CONSTRUCTION
_ \ _ •-• T i -vv.- -rtu- - - - RUNWAY SAFETY AREA 7 CENTRAL BUILDING (LEASED) 19 NOLAN- DECO70 (LYING (FBO)
�- - _ _ S. 16m Ave. DOES NOT MEET 15' CLEAR i0 25 A - 'h I yls
- -- - - -- - -- • - + .� I -OR— — -0r2- - - - OBJECT FREE ZONE B ELECTRICAL VAULT / EG 20 AIRPORT MAINTENANCE BUILDING
__E__ APPROACH TO RUNWAY 27 (EXISTING CONDITION •_ - -- -- --- - $ t -. ) �fi��.�'4114811111111* j I -or - - - -or.- - - - OBJECT FREE AREA 9 FAA CONTROL TOWER AND BEACON 21 INDUSTRIAL HANGAR
/ ✓ ✓✓ 4111 P _` • '- " `' � r`
• �- -NOD -� i- NOO._� LAND CONTOURS 10 FEDERAL EXPRESS / U.S. CUSTOMS • 1110' \ �BLf \ \ � '�' I '• AIRPORT RFEERENCE POINT (ARP) 11 AUTO PARKING (PUBLIC)
2 a a -
2S � � R ROAD ELEV. 1096' PaVEO ROADS 12 PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING
' . i \ - 1- -----_ � /p I 15' CLEAR ` � -
ALL WEATHER WIND ROSE DIRT ROADS —
\ �� r Wq. GLIDE SLOPE CRITICAL Source: Notional Climatic Data Cente CREE _ WIND ROSE ANAYLSIS
•gC\OP r - \ \ R VN --II \O AREA (LILT) o .- Yorimo. Washington / .- LAND ACQUISITION
E i+- 41111-12.11111/- 20p•
200' o, ` • Period of Record 1982 - 1990
( )/ \ r\ . � YPR X 150' ° RWY. ALIGNMENT WIND VELOCITY WIND COVERAGE
O
PROPER
PROPOSED T I S , BLAST PAD -
N AWISITION / / + 1D5 Knots 94.4
�, / TEMP. 9 -27
/ \ _ �� 1 WA R IR CARGO \ 9 -27 13.0 Knots 973
k \ \ --. 2p vt7 N CTDN ALE RAMP (ULT.) \/D 9 -27 16.0 Knots 98.59
U
. FU 2 EL ++ I,Ur R -.. �\ �_. _ ` HO[O G �RE RP .- `FUR ' RSq �\�� I p /W,uT "� _ QI \ 10708" < 4 -22 1 Knots 96.2 • ROAD ELEV. 1118' `\ q`/ -,� ' ; \ y \
21' CLEAR x 1 9 -27 4 -22 10.5 Knots 98.7
\ J ,�� �,,� c ; � O - - / 1 }.0 Knots 99.1
17' CLEAR ROAD ELEV. 1112' ` �\ - 1 N• SEE TERMINAL AREA PUN N 9 -27 / 4 -22
L I FOR HEIGHTS OF OBJECTS
Y .- _ ^n a RC DATA CENTER
/ i _.\� `_r ; _ _ o S , �� N MAX. ELEV. al :'L 35' aCOVe�unway E 87.8R YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
\ 0 PERIOD OF RECORD 1982 -1990
q " \ d R OAD ELEV. I• .' �
\ -- / t C --\ ;yin 6 \.--" `� - 44' CLEAR ' 0 ROAD ELEV. 1039' AI
® ° �W._ WASHINGTON? i' SPRING ROAD PRINC C-- a O3 \' - / f 7/ �'o. WEST WASHINGi N AYE.
-�� \Cone f �— O - \ . r•'
. j0 jIO,°`q 1 1 c� ' � NOTES:
\ � ` : ; I % ER � :/ - THE SHOWN E %TENSIONS FOR RUNWAY 9 -27 AND 4 -22 ARE NOT 4 A AREA (LILT) ROAD LEY1100` ' \ � Lp '' '00' RUNWAY PROCTION ZONE ANALSS MUST BE COMPLETED PROR TO
`d 2 ' 1� ,` BLAST PAD RUNWAY LENGTHENING. •
ROAD E ' V. •0' B L\ _ ,x'83 ELEV •59 ���/� O5` I RO AD ELEV. 045'
41' • . A' — /1 S - - . \_ W * �'_\ A 4� iI \�� 5' CLEAR V
...:\ ,-T • LOCAUZ -' \ ` •._�__ O. \ ��T� ✓•C�� 04��� a
CRITICAL AREA (EXIST) -IV I �` / /�
�� v
/ �` _ARP - . ARF�' `\� \ \ \ v�
` ' O F
\ �` S0. 16 R PRO / '�� Oe TO BE R 6 ::T: ACOTION ' V. 1030 ' CLEAR
/ , Oh MTedaCoc 5': �••� _ \
` A�' k �� ��� ��` ROAD ELEV. 1023'
o A \ '�`• \\. C�. T ► z- -" i 60' CLEAR r� �R� �� �"`"�'- LOCALIZER CRITICAL RUNWAY DATA n a� ` i A \� ,'` _ Rsq _ �tC ;,4,r � \ ,1 es AREA (LILT) T 2 '^ 0 00 >'- - � o FORMER LANDFILL -' - 4 , 9 � ��. ` �' . _ Po egL \ 1 , / �S RPI o
RUNWAY 9 -27 RUNWAY 4 -22 0/ . �ao6G $\ I�• _ �0+:r.%+� � 1 `10' `h c, � I '� � /� •, Etc A OS �i. ��r►I"� 2pp �' +' v g !� - -r � • I'—'' PIONEER STREET
EXISTING ULTIMATE EXISTING ULTIMATE Q ' " '`,x`>� � . � secTET'+" VIER ��"SSra � %,�� ` .1 qpP' n ''''''T „• \ =_ _ �� W APPROACH CATEGORY C C B B � � - ' EV, . VO 3 2 / 1 r 0 REMOVED ( LT.' RE R S S(• E ; j . ' 'ZY� PROPOSED
3 0 \ q� �pRDPERT AW151 TION i. RUNWAY LENGIH 7,603' 10,760' 3,825' 150'0 , 4 V • OB CREEK � L \ Io` i�' .� �R Jp�.L / �� • w � RUNWAY WIDTH 150' 150' 750' N0.(-- 8 A(,1 4 E L / ` 1Dr __. " ' � O RUNWAY LIGHTING HURL MIRL MIRL MIRL tU Q'1 .� _, ✓ . / I�RLIITIECAL •� �- \ � f -O C kl RUNWAY MARKINGS PRECISION I �I q PREGSION VISUAL VISUAL 7 ' O p0. ' / . 1038' . -_ - -- ` ]li ASR CLEARANCE AREA `��; ` NAVIGATIONAL AIDS VOR /DME/ILS vOR/DME/TS /GIPS NONE NONE LJ ..""•.--- -_� POSSIBLE FU NRE RO :1 20:1 c? � F. U p, - _ K sa/11i A; f'P I I RE LOCATION -� � APPROACH SURFACE SLOPE 9 -34: 27 -50:1 50:1 20 -_. • � TIVE RUNWAY GRADIENT (x) 0.66 0.73 0.56 0.58 �'' p0 �� _ ORr CCESS I I 1 ROAD ELEV. 1039' _ /N) /
EFFEC /� � ¢ p p0. 0 II I ( O 1 18' CLEAR t • ' � PAVEMENT STRENGTH (000) 0- 110/DT -175 D- 170/07 -256 570/D80/OT120 570 /DBO /OT120 n - VISUAL APPROACH AIDS VAST PAPI IASI PAPI PAVEMENT MATERIAL ASPH -PFC ASPH -PFC ASPM -PFC ASPH -PFC - _ - .- - 1 I I • ? O AIR CARGO RUNWAY PROTECTION • E �I
6 1I I '� ' r COMPLEX (U T.) \
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA WIDTH 500' 500' 150' 150' a \,
o `�
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA LENGTH 9,603' 12.160' 4,315' 4,900' FUTURE S RNCE N
BO o I = / ROAD
/- L - - --j-
DESIGN GROUP III IV 1 N I I / FUTURE ROAD E 1025
: ° 39' CLEAR
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE vADTIi 400' 400' 250' 250'
OBSTACLE FREE ZONE LENGTH 8,003' 10.560' 4,235' 4.820 / ' - L —
FUTURE ROAD E V. 1026'
r _ AHTANUM ROAD ° / 38' CLEAR p
_OBJECT FREE AREA LENGTH 9,603' 12,160' 4,835' 5,420'
I
OBJECT FREE AREA WIDTH 800' 400' 400' / / N
\ / MAG. DEC. 18'38' E (1993)
TAXIWAY UGH TING MI 8110 MIT_ NONE MITL
CRITICAL AIRCRAFT BOEING 727 BOEING 757 BEECH BARON BEECH KING AIR \ ` / / 0 600 1200 1800
RUNWAY END COORDINATES --
SCALE IN FEET
AIRPORT DATA YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
DECLARED DISTANCES RUNWAY END LATITUDE LONGITUDE APPROVAL BLOCK
RUNWAY 9 -27 RUNWAY 4 -22 - EXISTING ULTIMATE
Ezlsn4c 27 46' 34' 22.62' 120' 31' 43.59- AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT NORT H 120' 33' 2584' YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL MASTER PLAN
27 46' 33' 56.62- H U0TUDE 46' 34' 06.50 46' 34' 06.34' Yakima, Washington
EXISTING ULTIMATE EXISTING ULTIMATE 4 46 33 51.18 120 32 44.81 COORDINATES - WEST LONGITUDE 120' 32' 30.14' 120 32' 31.68' ,ae.Al AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN
-
A 7,603' 10.160' 3.835' 4,420' 22 46' 34' 10.12 120' 31' 57.32' AIRPORT CATEGORY - PRIMARY PRIMARY
ULTIMATE 9 46' 34' 26.60' 120' 33' 43.04 91 -470 ocsc.co er. TEP ..,. 3 - -
MEAN MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE (K' HOTTEST MONTH 87' 87' W.W.5
5 7,603' 10.160' 3,835' 4,420' -
TETRA 7,603' 10,160' 3,835' 4,420' 27 46' 33' 52.30 120' 31' 26.40' AIRPORT ELEVATION - MEAN SEA _EVEL 1095' 1100' o•••••c "o.
rle0 134A.■ or COS o•a. 3 -15 -94
VOfi /DME/ILS(27
VOR
TOOK 7,603' 10,160' 3.835' 4,420' 4 46' 33' 48.25' 120' 32' 52.06' NAVIGATIORAL AIDS _ -- ) /DME/ILS /GIPS o'sK'""
22 46' 34' 10.12" .4--T 1 20' 31' 57.32 AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE C -III C -IV Y" 4s 41.4 xriln Ox TEP oms. -
ALL COORDINATES IN NAD 83
NPIAS ROLE COMMERDAL SERVICE COMMERCIAL SERVICE 0014, • or 2 M B UQ- , IAN4'415 & AAObITtn I
- -
It I
KANSAS • MISSOURI • TEXAS • ILLINOS • COL ORAUO • WA9HI9010N
f BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
® AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 1
For Meeting Of January 18, 2000
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an ordinance relating to safety of
airport
operations at the Yakima Air Terminal and regulating
the height of objects in the vicinity of the air
to urinal.
SUBMITTED BY: toiliam R. Cook, Director of Community & Economic
Development
CONTACT PERSON /TELEPHONE: Don S. Skone, Planning Manager - 575 -6184
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The Yakima Airport Board has requested the City of Yakima take action
to prohibit any building or development at the airport that does not
comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. (See
Attached Letter of June 24, 1999) The purpose of the requested action
is to implement assurances included in each Federal Aviation
Administration grant. (See Attached Memorandum of Dec. 8, 1999) The
assurances provide that appropriate action will be taken to prevent
"...the establishment or creation of future airport hazards." The area
of concern is land located between the centerline of the main runway
(9/27) and the runway building restriction line (BRL). (See Attached
Airport Layout Plan) The City Legal Department has prepared the
attached ordinance to protect this area from all development except
facilities of the airport. The ordinance will affect only one property
not owned or controlled by the airport, the State Fish Hatchery.
Resolution Ordinance_X Other
(Specify)
Contract Mail to (name and address) :
.. Phone:
Funding
Source 0
' APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:_ --,- % \1 \ i L A Piriq/k City
Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve proposed ordinance
III BOARD /COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Airport Board requested action.
COUNCIL ACTION: