Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-052 Skyland Company, Inc. Rezone (Winco) • Return To: Yakima City Clerk 129 North Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 Document Title: ORDINANCE NO. 2002 -52 Skyland Rezone / 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. & 911 S. 44 Ave. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02 Grantor: City of Yakima Grantee: Skyland Company, Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (For parcels 181327 -24019 & 24020) The N 642.50 ft of the E 1 /2 of the W 1 /2 of the SE 1 /4 of the NW 1 /4 of Section 27, Township 13 N, Range 18 E, W.M:; EXCEPT the N 488.125 feet thereof and EXCEPT the E 30.00 ft for street AND the N 642.50 ft of the W 1 /2 of the SW 1 /4 of the NW 1 /4 of Section 27, Township 13 N, . Range 18 E, W.M., EXCEPT the N 333.75 ft thereof and EXCEPT the W 30.00 ft for street. (For parcel 181327 - 24028) The W 1 /2 of the SE 1 /4 of the NW 1 /4 of Section 27, Township 13 N, Range 18 E, W.M., EXCEPT the S 41.5 ft for public road & right -of -way of Yakima Valley Transportation Co., AND EXCEPT the N 642.5 feet. Parcel Number: 181327 - 24019, 24020, and 24028 HMI 1111 III III III I II 7321758 Pag 1 of 17 03/11/2603 0 CITY OF YAKIMA. OR O 135.00. Yakima Co, WA ORDINANCE NO. 2002- 52 AN ORDINANCE concerning land use regulation and planning, rezoning certain parcels of property located in the vicinity of W. Nob Hill Blvd. and S. 44th Ave. from Multi- Family Residential (R -3) to Small Convenience Center (SCC) as more fully described herein, and approving, with conditions, the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner for the City of Yakima regarding a certain Class (2) land use for operation of a supermarket /convenience store; Skyland Company, Inc., as applicant herein. WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner for the City of Yakima issued a recommendation on September 3, 2002, recommending that the City approve the rezoning of certain parcels of property as more fully described herein, which rezone was applied for by Skyland Company, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the considerations of the Hearing Examiner in response to the requirements of Yakima Municipal Code ( "YMC ") § 15.23.030(E) are correct and appropriate, and that the same should be adopted by the City Council as its findings herein; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner recommended that the associated application for Class (2) review of the operation of a supermarket /convenience store be approved with conditions set forth on pages 11 and 12 of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to enact the following; now therefore: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON: Section 1. The following parcels of property located in the vicinity of W. Nob Hill Blvd. and S. 44th Ave. within the City of Yakima shall be, and the same hereby are, rezoned from Multi- Family Residential (R -3) to Small Convenience Center (SCC): 181327 -24019 and - 24020. Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" is a copy of the legal description of said property. 7321758 Page: 2 of 17 UIJ LJ 1 tJJ ORD 135.68 YYakima2Co, WR'16P Section 2. The findings of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation in this matter dated September 3, 2002, are hereby adopted by the City Council as its findings in support hereof pursuant to YMC § 15.23.030(F), and are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. The proposed Class (2) use of the subject premises (together with parcel number 181327 - 24028) for the operation of a supermarket /convenience is hereby approved subject to conditions set forth on pages 11 and 12 of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on said proposed use, which conditions are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 4. Any and all zoning, land use, and other similar maps maintained by the City of Yakima shall be amended or modified to reflect said rezone. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Yakima County Auditor. Section 5. Severability: If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL at a regular meeting and signed and approved this 15th day of October, 2002. Mary Pt, , e, Mayor ATTEST: Certified to he a true and correct copy � the original filed in my office. 10—,951-0 CITY CLERK City Clerk , i By v Publication Date: 10-18 -2002 rho Effective Date: 11 -17 -2002 111111 1111111 111111 �*s 7321758 Page: 3 of 17 03/11/2093 03:16P f' .TTY rr YAKIMA no roc nn Legal description of Parcels #181327 -24019 and #181327 -24020 The North 642.50 of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 north, Range 18 east W.M.: EXCEPT the North 488.125 feet thereof alf of the Southwest Quarter of the street AND the North 642.50 feet of the West Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, W.M., EXCEPT the North 333.75 feet thereof and EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet for street. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. • Legal Description of Parcel # 24028 The West' of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, W.M., EXCEPT the South 41.5 feet for public road and right of way of Yakima Valley Transportation Company, AND EXCEPT North 642.5 feet. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. • EXHIBIT A 11 11 1 111 OM 11 11 7321758 Page: 4 of 17 I'TTY nr YAVTMA 03/11/2003 03 :16P nRn t15 AA Yakima Co, UA In the Matter of the Master Application ) City File Nos. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO by ) CL(2) #21 -02 ) ) Sky land Company, Inc. ) HEARING EXAMINER'S � vE® ) RECOMMENDATION S EP 0 3 2002 C1TY OF yes To rezone R -3 properties to SCC and ) PLANN)NG ON obtain Class (2) zoning for grocery store ) development ) No. 11J02-2-11 Skyland Company, Inc. ( "Skyland ") has applied pursuant to the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 15.23 YMC) for an amendment to the urban area zoning map to change the zoning designation of certain parcels from R -3, Multifamily Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Skyland also filed an application for Class (2) zoning review of a proposed supermarket/convenience store development covering the subject property together with other immediately adjacent property already zoned SCC. The Planning Division treated the applications as a master application rather than conducting sequential review of the applications, and issued public notice accordingly. An open record hearing was conducted on August 22, 2002, and the Hearing Examiner conducted a site visit on the same date. SUMIVIARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The requested change in zoning for the subject properties and the proposed supermarket development should be approved, subject to conditions. From the site visit, a review of the staff report and other exhibits, information received at the hearing, and a review of Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the subject application, the Hearing Examiner makes the following FINDINGS 1. Applicant: Skyland Company, Inc., P.O. Box 400, Woodburn, Oregon 97071. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -1 r. _ A. II II I III III I • 7321758 Page: 5 of 17 03/11/2803 CITY OF YAKIMA DRD 1235.00. Yakima Co, WR 2. Applications: Zoning map amendment to change the subject properties from R -3 to SCC and Class (2) review of a proposed 24 -hour supermarket to be constructed on the properties. 3. Location and Parcel Numbers: 4309 W. Nob Hill Boulevard and 911 S 44 Avenue within the City of Yakima. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 181327 - 24028, -24019 and - 24020. 4. Owners: Assessors records indicate that parcels 181327 -24019 and -24020 are owned by Winco Foods, Inc. The site plan indicates Gregory T. Anderson is the current owner of 181327- 24028. 5. Zoning and Land Use: The current zoning of the parcels subject to rezoning (181327 -21019 and - 24020) is R -3, Multifamily Residential and has been historically used for residential purposes. The parcel currently zoned SCC is a defunct drive-in movie theater. Surrounding zoning and land use is as shown below Location Zoning Existing Land Use North R -3 Multi- Family Residential East R -3 Multi - Family Residential West R -1 Public School South R -1, R -2, B -2 Commercial/Residential 6. Property Description: The subject properties are contiguous and flat. They are bounded to the west by South 44 Avenue, to the south by a City of Yakima - owned right of way along West Nob Hill Boulevard, and to the east by South 42 Avenue. All municipal utilities are available on the property, including potential stormwater management facilities. Current access to the SCC .parcel is near the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44Th Avenue. Access to the R -3 properties is off of their respective road frontages. South 42n Avenue and South 44 Avenue are substandard in width in the vicinity of the defunct drive -in. The properties are underlain by sewer and stormwater /drainage improvement HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -2 111 110 II I I II 11 II I 111 7321758 Page : 6 of 17 03/11/2003 '16P CtTY [1r ACM ORD 435.09 Yakima Co, WA conveyance pipes. The R -3 parcels are separated from neighboring residential properties by a combination of un- slatted chain link fence and wood fence six feet or less in height. 7. Proposed Use: Skyland proposes to construct a 79,000 square foot supermarket • on the combined acreage. The site plan calls for 621 parking spaces. The site plan also includes two areas designated as Pad A and Pad B for which there are not current development plans but that are intended for future retail development. Five points of access are planned for the project: two off of South 42 Avenue, two off of South 44 Avenue (the more northerly which would be exit only), and one off of West Nob Hill Boulevard (right turn in and out only). Skyland proposes a new traffic signal at the intersection of W. Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue. Additional right of way along South 42n and South 44 Avenues would be dedicated to the city to meet road width standards. Skyland proposes to construct a masonry block wall along the north boundary line of the properties, but wishes to defer construction of the wall on the western -most segment of the boundary until such time as Pad B is developed for SCC uses. S. Notices: Notice for the hearing was provided in accordance with the zoning ordinance requirements in the following manner: • Application and SEPA notices mailed to adjacent owners July 5, 2002. • Notice posted on property August 1, 2002. • Legal Ad published in the Yakima Herald August 2, 2002. 9. Environmental Review: A Washington State Environmental Policy Act Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ( "MDNS ") was issued on July 31, 2001. No appeals were filed. 10. Analysis of Rezone Application: a. Rezone review criteria. YMC 15.23.030.E provides the following criteria to be considered in making a recommendation on a zoning map amendment, which are respectively analyzed below: • The suitability of the property in question for uses permitted under the proposed zoning; HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -3 1111101111 7321 Page 7 of 17 !!!!Q! I J!J llhIII DRD 135.00 0a kima 2 Co, WR'16P • The extent to which the proposed amendments are in compliance with and/or deviate from the goals and policies as adopted in the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan and the intent of [Title 15 YMC]; • The compatibility of the proposed zone change and associated uses with neighboring land uses; • The recommendation from interested agencies and departments; • The adequacy of public facilities, such as roads, sewer, water anld other required public services; • The public need for the proposed change; and, • The testimony at the public hearing. b. Suitability of the property for small convenience center uses. The R -3 properties taken together are immediately adjacent to property already zoned SCC. The property is flat and does not present physical limitations to use for SCC purposes. Even disregarding the nearby SCC property, the current R -3 acreage fits within the presumptive appropriate area for SCC uses noted in the zoning district intent statement in YMC 15.03.030.8. The properties contain underground stormwater management facilities, and so must be developed in a manner that protects the facilities and their use. This may be addressed by appropriate construction planning. Access directly from Nob Hill Boulevard to property by means other than the existing access will require an agreement with the city to use the old trolley right of way. Such an agreement is being negotiated. c. Compliance with and/or deviation from the YUACP and the intent of zoning ordinance. The proposed rezone affects properties that have been used for 30 years for multiple family housing, consistent with the current zoning. The YUACP seeks generally to stabilize neighbor hoods and to avoid removal of units from housing stock. See YUACP Objective H3.1 and Policy H3.4 (at p.11-38, II-39). At the same time, the YUACP promotes convenient shopping locations consistent with the development patterns in the community. See YUACP p.II.41. Furthermore, neighborhood shopping centers (grocery stories, etc.) should be allowed at arterial intersections under the plan. (Policy C3.4 at YUACP p. II-42). No evidence or HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -4 II I IM I IN I II I II 11111 11 7321758 Page: 6 of 17 03/11/2003 03:16P f' ITV (W VAKTMA ORO 135.00. Yakima Co, WA testimony has been presented indicating that, in considering these policies, a rezone should be denied. To the contrary, an amendment (File No. CPA #6 -02) to the YUACP future land use map designating the subject properties was approved at a joint meeting of the Yakima City Council and the Yakima County Board of Commissioners on August 20, 2002. The amendment changes the future land use from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. At present, no ordinancehas been passed by the city council ado jting the changes to the YUACP, but the approval of the amendment by the joint body strongly indicates that the small convenience center use of the property will not compromise YUACP objectives and policies. Generally, the intent of the zoning ordinance is aligned with YUACP goals and objectives. There is no evidence that the intent of the zoning ordinance would in any way be compromised by the proposed rezone, presuming that the potential uses comply with the specifically applicable provisions of the ordinance. d. Compatibility of associated uses with neighboring land uses. Neighboring land uses are a mix of high- density residential, low density residential, and small scale commercial uses. An elementary school is located immediately to the west. Most of the uses allowed in the SCC zone are retail uses that bring truck and car traffic, with associated noise, light and safety issues. As a result of environmental review process, various conditions have been identified that render traffic impacts environmentally insignificant. Conditioning any approval of the change in zoning and proposed development in accordance with MDNS conditions will help minimize traffic related activities, as will the location of the facility on property directly served by an existing arterial street. Bulk and dimensional features of the possible uses on SCC may raise compatibility issues with residential uses. Height limitations are the same in the SCC and the neighboring residential districts. The SCC has less restrictive lot coverage requirements, such that if all developable property was developed with structures of the maximum allowable height, a sharp visual contrast would result. However, commercial uses carry parking requirements that ameliorate the bulk contrasts. The land use compatibility chart in YUACP Figure III -2 (1997 YUACP p. III -7) indicates the HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -5 7321758 Page; 9 of 17 0311112003 03 :16P MTY nr Y 1Ma ORO 0 08 Yakima Co) WA compatibility of Neighborhood Commercial use with residential uses, subject to accounting for specific site conditions. Visual and noise impacts are also the basis for sitescreening requirements. In accordance with Chapter 15.07 YMC, a Sitescreening Standard "A" screen is required where different uses are separated by a street. Thus that standard will be met on the east, west and south property boundaries for any development of the combined properties. A Sitescreening Standard "C" sitescreen is required on the northern boundary of the parcels • to comply with the standards. Because of the location of apartments very near to the northern boundary in the central portion, truck traffic and cargo handling activities along the boundary would create potential conflicts. Public comment and evidence in the record indicates that a customary means of dealing with such potential conflict is the installation of an eight -foot masonry block wall at the boundary with an interiorly- situated landscaped buffer strip. At the hearing the applicant and the neighboring property owner indicated that such sitescreening would adequately address compatibility issues. The eight -foot masonry block fence and planting strip will be required for any development that will bring truck or queued auto traffic in close proximity to the northern property boundary. e. Agency and department recommendations. Agencies commented extensively on transportation issues. Those comments were the basis for conditions set forth in the MDNS and thus would be addressed in conditions on approval of the applications. Public utility facilities (sewer and stormwater conveyance pipes) must be protected from interference. This may require relocation utility facilities. All stormwater must typically be retained on -site, but the presence of Yakima County -owned stormwater management facilities may provide an option for off -site management. f. Adequacy of public facilities. This property is currently served by all necessary public utilities and is located on an arterial street. g. Public need. There is not a public need that demands the requested rezone. Nevertheless, the proposed rezone is consistent with the Future Land Use Map amendment approved by the City and County joint legislative bodies. There is a public need to implement zoning regulations consistent with comprehensive plans or amendments to plans in accordance with the state Growth Management Act, Chapter HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -6 7 32 23 1 :3 P age 17 3/11 16P PITY 0P YAKIMA DRD $35.00 Yakima Co, WA 36.70A RCW. Indeed, as pointed out by counsel for Skyland, though a change in circumstances is usually necessary to support a rezone, when the rezone is intended to implement comprehensive plan provision, it need not be based on changed circumstances. The Planning Division staff report indicates that [c]urrently within the City of Yakima there is an inadequate supply of vacant commercially zoned property located within easy reach of public utilities. This need for more ready -to- build commercial property, when viewed in conjunction with the already significant commercialization of Nob Hill Boulevard, is what prompted the Yakima Urban Area Planning Commission to recommend to the Joint Board that the future land use designation of this land be changed to permit commercial zoning at this location. Thus while there may be no compelling public need for the rezone, it is nevertheless consistent with public planning policies. h. Public comment. Public comments were addressed in the context of the other rezone review criteria. Public comment was received regarding the economic viability additional retail facilities in the area, but the economic viability is a matter to be judged by the applicant in determining to pursue a development. 11. Analysis of Class(2) Application a. Class (2) review criteria. Presuming the rezone application to be approved, the 24 -hour operation of a grocery store is subject to Class (2) review. The administrative official's decision in Class (2) review must comply with the objectives of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan, the intent of the zoning district, and the provisions and standards established in the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. b. YUACP Compliance. Development of a grocery store is clearly consistent with Neighborhood Commercial future land use designation as discussed in the rezone section. So long as the 24 -hour operation does not interfere with integrity of the nearby residential neighborhoods, Plan compliance is not at issue. The site plan locates the store structure approximately 200 feet from the residences across South 42 ° Avenue. The school across South 44 Avenue is not in use after 10:00 p.m. as a general proposition. No evidence of conflict as a result of the 24 -hour operations has been HEARING EXAMINER RECOMvIENDATION -7 732 Page: 1 7 8 of 17 03/11/2003 '16P CITY OF YAKIMA ORO 125 . 0& Yakima Co, WA presented, presuming the installation of appropriate sitescreening provisions and compliance with other traffic safety conditions. c. Intent of the Zoning District. Development of a grocery store is clearly consistent with the intent of the zoning district in as much as the intent is set forth in YMC 15.03.030.8 as follows: "Uses in this district should be retail or personal service establishments dealing directly with the consumer, the primary occupants usually being a supermarket and drug store." d. Development standards. (1) Parking. The proposed new supermarket will be 79,000 square feet in size. The parking standard for supermarkets is four spaces for every 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Based upon this standard a total of 211 parking spaces are required and 621 parking spaces are indicated on the site plan. (2) Required Landscaping of Parking Areas. Five per cent of the total parking area is required to be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of YMC 15.06.090. The final site plan for this project must indicate which areas are to be landscaped and the calculations provided to verify that the standard has been met. (3) Lighting. Lighting must be provided to illuminate any off-street parking or loading space used at night. When provided, lighting shall be directed to reflect away from adjacent properties. (4) Sitescreening. Three different standards, A, B and C, have been established to accommodate a range of sitescreening needs. Only Standards A and C are relevant for present purposes. Standard A requires a ten -foot wide landscaped planting strip with trees at twenty -foot to thirty -foot centers, shrubs, and groundcover. Standard C requires a six - foot -high, view - obscuring fence, made of wood, masonry block or slatted chain link. A three- foot -wide planting strip landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover along the outside of the fence is also required when the fence is adjacent to streets, alleys and pedestrian ways. Based upon the existing adjacent land uses and this proposed use, sitescreening standard "A" is required along the east, west and south property lines. This is due to the fact that these properties are all separated from this development by streets. Sitescreening Standard "C" is required along the north property line adjacent to the proposed use. An HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -8 7321758 03g11r2003 03 16P PITY nF YRKIMA ORD $35.00 Yakima Co, WA eight -foot masonry wall with an interior planted buffer strip is recommended as a condition of approval along the north boundary to address compatibility of truck traffic and loading activities with current neighboring uses, thus adjusting the Standard C provisions for the subject properties. The area designated as Pad B on the preliminary site plan is designated for unspecified future development. The applicant has requested that compliance with the site screening standards on the north side of Pad B be deferred until development is • actually undertaken. Timing of sitescreening installation is addressed at YMC 15.07.100: "All sitescreening required by this title shall be installed prior to occupancy or commencement of use. " Furthermore, "[No] permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued until all required sitescreening is completed." The northern boundary of Pad B is separated from the grocery store development by approximately 150 feet. This exceeds width of an arterial street right of way. Until such time as the pad is developed, it does no violence to the purpose of the sitescreening standards to allow maintenance of the current chain link fence at that location, particularly if the current landscaping in the area of Pad B is maintained and irrigated. The final site plan must conform to the provisions of section 15.05.040 regarding vision clearance at intersections. (5) Setbacks. The building setbacks shown on the site plan comply with zoning ordinance standards. (6) Signs. The site plan indicates a 35 -foot tall pylon sign with 200 square feet of message area. This sign is to be located to the east of the access driveway from Nob Hill Boulevard. This proposed sign would be in conformance with the City's sign standards provided that the sign is located 15. feet or more from the edge of the public right -of -way. (7) Lot coverage. The lot coverage standard within the SCC zoning district is 85 per cent. According to the site plan lot coverage for this project will be less than 80 per cent. From the foregoing findings, the Hearing Examiner makes the following HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -9 775 8 Page: 13 0311 03 of 1 6P NTY nr YAKIMR ORD $35.00 Yakima Co, WA CONCLUSIONS 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to conduct an open record hearing on the applications to (1) change the zoning of the properties identified in the findings from R -3 to SCC and (2) construct a 79,000 square foot supermarket with 24 -hour operations on such properties, and to make a recommendation on the applications to the Yakima City Council. 2. The requirements for public notice of the applications and the hearing • were satisfied. 3. The subject property is suitable for some of the uses permitted under the proposed zoning so long as the uses comply with applicable design and development standards set out in the Yakima Municipal Code. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the amendments to the Future Land Use Map approved by the city and county legislative bodies on August 20, 2002. 5. The proposed amendment complies with the intent of the zoning ordinance so long as the applicant demonstrates the availability of sufficient traffic capacity on the affected streets to support the range of potential uses in the proposed district. 6. The proposed amendment does not present any substantial incompatibility with neighboring land uses so long as actual uses comply with the design, development and review requirements in the Yakima Municipal Code, the applicant proceeds consistently with MDNS conditions, and the applicant installs previously described eight - foot masonry walls and vegetative buffer strips along the northerly property boundaries. 7. Public facilities are adequate at the site to support the proposed use and other possible light industrial uses of the property, so long as supported by an appropriate transportation capacity analysis. 8. The rezone is in the public interest and is an appropriate action for implementing comprehensive plan amendments, subject to conditions. 9. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket complies with the objectives of the YUACP. 10. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket complies with intent of the SCC zoning district. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -10 imptingiliting 7321758 Page 14 of 17 P/TY nr YAKIMA O RO 35.9A 03/11/2003 WR.16P 11. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket, subject to certain conditions, complies with applicable development standards in the urban area zoning ordinance. 12. In view of the preceding conclusions, the project meets consistency requirements set forth in YMC 16.06.020. From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner makes the following RECOMMENDATION The applications to rezone properties from R -3, Multiple Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center and to construct a 24 -hour supermarket on the SCC - zoned properties should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plan of development, as represented by the submitted general site plan shall be substantially complied with. 2. An additional 25 feet of right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along N. 42 Avenue for the combined length the of western boundary of the all the parcels included in the project site in order to render the street compliant with city street standards. This right -of -way shall be improved with curb, gutter and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk; 20 feet of asphalt paving to 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet past centerline for a 20 -foot wide section with controlled drainage. 3. A streetlight shall be installed at the intersection of South 44 Avenue with W. Nob Hill Blvd. The signal must be approved by the City Engineer and meet all MUTCD standards. The intersection will need be re- striped to denote appropriate items such as a cross -walk will be marked across all street frontages; handicap curb ramps be installed at all crosswalks; stop -bars painted in locations consistent with MUTCD. The traffic signal to be installed will be compatible with the City of Yakima NEMA standards. 4. Where necessary, additional right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along S 44 Avenue to assure that there is a full 25 feet of right -of -way from centerline. This frontage shall be improved with curb, gutter, a 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and asphalt paving for 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet over centerline and a street light at the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard. BEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -11 111111 1111 1111111 II 7321758 Page: 15 of 17 03111/2003 03 :1SP f iTY lF YAKIMA ORD i35.60 Yakima Co, WA 5. The sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed new building site must be relocated, subject to prior review by Public Works. 6. The Drainage Irrigation District #40 lines running through this site are owned and operated by Yakima County. The applicant shall contact Yakima County Public Works concerning the relocation of these lines. 7. All stormwater shall be retained and managed on site unless the applicant enters an agreement with an authorized stormwater management utility to manage stormwater offsite. 8. Site screening standard "C ", where applied, shall require an eight -foot tall masonry block wall and an interior planting strip. 9. Until such time as the area designated as Pad B on the preliminary site plan is developed, the current chain link fence on the northern boundary of Pad B may be retained, so long as current landscaping in the vicinity is substantially maintained and irrigated. 10. The north and south approaches on South 40 Avenue/West Nob Hill Boulevard intersection will be changed to a split phase operation and the center southbound lane will be converted from a through lane to a shared through/left lane. The applicant is responsible for the replacement of the traffic signal heads on the southbound mast arm, including a new 4- section signal head and a standard left turn head. 11. A Crossing Agreement shall be obtained from the City of Yakima for access to this site across the City -owned YVT property. 12. Permits must be obtained from the City of Yakima for all grading, construction and signs. All signs are to be installed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the zoning ordinance. 13. All project permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. 14. A final site plan is required showing any changes or conditions contained herein prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning review. 15. The development of the properties shall otherwise comply with all conditions set forth in the MDNS dated July 31, 2002 (File No. TJAZO EC #11 -02). HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -12 732175 Page: 8 16 of 17 03/1112003 03:16P PITY fir YAKIMA ORO i35.AA Yakima Co, WA DATED THIS 3 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 200 414( 4 410 1 20121 - P•, RICK D. SPURGIN HEARING EXAMINER P' ! ' M HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -13 111111111111111111111111111111111111 7321758 . . ' CITY OF YAKIMA DRD g3 0 3 g 11 t 2 003.03.16P 5.00 Yairlmz PA iie BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. * 3 For Meeting Of October 15, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Ordinance Adoption — Skyland Company, Inc. Rezone & Class (2) Review SUBMITTED BY. iliiam R. Cook, Director, Community & Economic Development CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner 575 -6042 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: On September 17, 2002 the City Council voted to accept the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve a rezone and Class (21.land use application for property located at 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard and 911 S 44' Avenue. Attached for your action is the ordinance that will effect this rezone from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center as well as approve the Class (2) request. Resolution _ Ordinance X Contract _ Other (Specify) Funding Source APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance. BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner recommended approval of this rezone on September 3, 2002. COUNCIL ACTION: Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2002 -52 SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE EXHIBIT LIST City Council Closed Record Public Hearing September 17, 2002 Table of Contents CHAPTER AA Hearing Examiner's Recommendation CHAPTER A Staff Report CHAPTER B Maps / Site Plan CHAPTER C DST (Development Services Team) Comments CHAPTER D SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) review CHAPTER E Comment letters received CHAPTER F Applications CHAPTER G Transportation Impact Analysis CHAPTER H Notices SKYLAND COMPANY INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER AA Hearing Examiner's Recommendation EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE AA -1 Hearing Examiner Pro Tem's Recommendation 9 -3 -02 In the Matter of the Master Application ) City File Nos. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO by ) CL(2) #21 -02 ) ) Sky land Company, Inc. ) HEARING EXAMINER'S �ECevE RECOMMENDATION SEP 0 3 2002 CITY OF YgKII�A To rezone R -3 properties to SCC and ) P LA NNING DIV. obtain Class (2) zoning for grocery store ) development ) No. IUO2-2-11 Skyland Company, Inc. ( "Skyland ") has applied pursuant to the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 15.23 YMC) for an amendment to the urban area zoning map to change the zoning designation of certain parcels from R -3, Multifamily Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Skyland also filed an application for Class (2) zoning review of a proposed supermarket/convenience store development covering the subject property together with other immediately adjacent property already zoned SCC. The Planning Division treated the applications as a master application rather than conducting sequential review of the applications, and issued public notice accordingly. An open record hearing was conducted on August 22, 2002, and the Hearing Examiner conducted a site visit on the same date. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The requested change in zoning for the subject properties and the proposed supermarket development should be approved, subject to conditions. From the site visit, a review of the staff report and other exhibits, information received at the hearing, and a review of Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the subject application, the Hearing Examiner makes the following FINDINGS 1. Applicant: Skyland Company, Inc., P.O. Box 400, Woodburn, Oregon 97071. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -1 — ez 4 -3-o 2. Applications: Zoning map amendment to change the subject properties from R -3 to SCC and Class (2) review of a proposed 24 -hour supermarket to be constructed on the properties. 3. Location and Parcel Numbers: 4309 W. Nob Hill Boulevard and 911 S 44 Avenue within the City of Yakima. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 181327 - 24028, -24019 and - 24020. 4. Owners: Assessors records indicate that parcels 181327 -24019 and -24020 are owned by Winco Foods, Inc. The site plan indicates Gregory T. Anderson is the current owner of 181327 - 24028. 5. Zoning and Land Use: The current zoning of the parcels subject to rezoning (181327 -21019 and - 24020) is R -3, Multifamily Residential and has been historically used for residential purposes. The parcel currently zoned SCC is a defunct drive -in movie theater. Surrounding zoning and land use is as shown below Location Zoning Existing Land Use North R -3 Multi - Family Residential East R -3 Multi - Family Residential West R -1 Public School South R -1, R -2, B -2 Commercial/Residential 6. Property Description: The subject properties are contiguous and flat. They are bounded to the west by South 44 Avenue, to the south by a City of Yakima - owned right of way along West Nob Hill Boulevard, and to the east by South 42 Avenue. All municipal utilities are available on the property, including potential stormwater management facilities. Current access to the SCC parcel is near the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue. Access to the R -3 properties is off of their respective road frontages. South 42 Avenue and South 44 Avenue are substandard in width in the vicinity of the defunct drive -in. The properties are underlain by sewer and stormwater /drainage improvement HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -2 conveyance pipes. The R -3 parcels are separated from neighboring residential properties by a combination of un- slatted chain link fence and wood fence six feet or less in height. 7. Proposed Use: Skyland proposes to construct a 79,000 square foot supermarket on the combined acreage. The site plan calls for 621 parking spaces. The site plan also includes two areas designated as Pad A and Pad B for which there are not current development plans but that are intended for future retail development. Five points of access are planned for the project: two off of South 42nd Avenue, two off of South 44 Avenue (the more northerly which would be exit only), and one off of West Nob Hill Boulevard (right turn in and out only). Skyland proposes a new traffic signal at the intersection of W. Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue. Additional right of way along South 42 and South 44 Avenues would be dedicated to the city to meet road width standards. Skyland proposes to construct a masonry block wall along the north boundary line of the properties, but wishes to defer construction of the wall on the western -most segment of the boundary until such time as Pad B is developed for SCC uses. 8. Notices: Notice for the hearing was provided in accordance with the zoning ordinance requirements in the following manner: • Application and SEPA notices mailed to adjacent owners July 5, 2002. • Notice posted on property August 1, 2002. • Legal Ad published in the Yakima Herald August 2, 2002. 9. Environmental Review: A Washington State Environmental Policy Act Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ( "MDNS ") was issued on July 31, 2001. No appeals were filed. 10. Analysis of Rezone Application: a. Rezone review criteria. YMC 15.23.030.E provides the following criteria to be considered in making a recommendation on a zoning map amendment, which are respectively analyzed below: • The suitability of the property in question for uses permitted under the proposed zoning; HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -3 • The extent to which the proposed amendments are in compliance with and /or deviate from the goals and policies as adopted in the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan and the intent of [Title 15 YMC]; • The compatibility of the proposed zone change and associated uses with neighboring land uses; • The recommendation from interested agencies and departments; • The adequacy of public facilities, such as roads, sewer, water and other required public services; • The public need for the proposed change; and, • The testimony at the public hearing. b. Suitability of the property for small convenience center uses. The R -3 properties taken together are immediately adjacent to property already zoned SCC. The property is flat and does not present physical limitations to use for SCC purposes. Even disregarding the nearby SCC property, the current R -3 acreage fits within the presumptive appropriate area for SCC uses noted in the zoning district intent statement in YMC 15.03.030.8. The properties contain underground stormwater management facilities, and so must be developed in a manner that protects the facilities and their use. This may be addressed by appropriate construction planning. Access directly from Nob Hill Boulevard to property by means other than the existing access will require an agreement with the city to use the old trolley right of way. Such an agreement is being negotiated. c. Compliance with and /or deviation from the YUACP and the intent of zoning ordinance. The proposed rezone affects properties that have been used for 30 years for multiple family housing, consistent with the current zoning. The YUACP seeks generally to stabilize neighbor hoods and to avoid removal of units from housing stock. See YUACP Objective H3.1 and Policy H3.4 (at p. II -38, 11-39). At the same time, the YUACP promotes convenient shopping locations consistent with the development patterns in the community. See YUACP p.11.41. Furthermore, neighborhood shopping centers (grocery stories, etc.) should be allowed at arterial intersections under the plan. (Policy C3.4 at YUACP p. II -42). No evidence or HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -4 testimony has been presented indicating that, in considering these policies, a rezone should be denied. To the contrary, an amendment (File No. CPA #6 -02) to the YUACP future land use map designating the subject properties was approved at a joint meeting of the Yakima City Council and the Yakima County Board of Commissioners on August 20, 2002. The amendment changes the future land use from High Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. At present, no ordinance has been passed by the city council adopting the changes to the YUACP, but the approval of the amendment by the joint body strongly indicates that the small convenience center use of the property will not compromise YUACP objectives and policies. Generally, the intent of the zoning ordinance is aligned with YUACP goals and objectives. There is no evidence that the intent of the zoning ordinance would in any way be compromised by the proposed rezone, presuming that the potential uses comply with the specifically applicable provisions of the ordinance. d. Compatibility of associated uses with neighboring land uses. Neighboring land uses are a mix of high- density residential, low density residential, and small scale commercial uses. An elementary school is located immediately to the west. Most of the uses allowed in the SCC zone are retail uses that bring truck and car traffic, with associated noise, light and safety issues. As a result of the environmental review process, various conditions have been identified that render traffic impacts environmentally insignificant. Conditioning any approval of the change in zoning and proposed development in accordance with MDNS conditions will help minimize traffic related activities, as will the location of the facility on property directly served by an existing arterial street. Bulk and dimensional features of the possible uses on SCC may raise compatibility issues with residential uses. Height limitations are the same in the SCC and the neighboring residential districts. The SCC has less restrictive lot coverage requirements, such that if all developable property was developed with structures of the maximum allowable height, a sharp visual contrast would result. However, commercial uses carry parking requirements that ameliorate the bulk contrasts. The land use compatibility chart in YUACP Figure III -2 (1997 YUACP p. III -7) indicates the HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -5 compatibility of Neighborhood Commercial use with residential uses, subject to accounting for specific site conditions. Visual and noise impacts are also the basis for sitescreening requirements. In accordance with Chapter 15.07 YMC, a Sitescreening Standard "A" screen is required where different uses are separated by a street. Thus that standard will be met on the east, west and south property boundaries for any development of the combined properties. A Sitescreening Standard "C" sitescreen is required on the northern boundary of the parcels to comply with the standards. Because of the location of apartments very near to the northern boundary in the central portion, truck traffic and cargo handling activities along the boundary would create potential conflicts. Public comment and evidence in the record indicates that a customary means of dealing with such potential conflict is the installation of an eight -foot masonry block wall at the boundary with an interiorly - situated landscaped buffer strip. At the hearing the applicant and the neighboring property owner indicated that such sitescreening would adequately address compatibility issues. The eight -foot masonry block fence and planting strip will be required for any development that will bring truck or queued auto traffic in close proximity to the northern property boundary. e. Agency and department recommendations. Agencies commented extensively on transportation issues. Those comments were the basis for conditions set forth in the MDNS and thus would be addressed in conditions on approval of the applications. Public utility facilities (sewer and stormwater conveyance pipes) must be protected from interference. This may require relocation utility facilities. All stormwater must typically be retained on -site, but the presence of Yakima County -owned stormwater management facilities may provide an option for off-site management. f. Adequacy of public facilities. This property is currently served by all necessary public utilities and is located on an arterial street. g. Public need. There is not a public need that demands the requested rezone. Nevertheless, the proposed rezone is consistent with the Future Land Use Map amendment approved by the City and County joint legislative bodies. There is a public need to implement zoning regulations consistent with comprehensive plans or amendments to plans in accordance with the state Growth Management Act, Chapter HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -6 36.70A RCW. Indeed, as pointed out by counsel for Skyland, though a change in circumstances is usually necessary to support a rezone, when the rezone is intended to implement comprehensive plan provision, it need not be based on changed circumstances. The Planning Division staff report indicates that [c]urrently within the City of Yakima there is an inadequate supply of vacant commercially zoned property located within easy reach of public utilities. This need for more ready -to- build commercial property, when viewed in conjunction with the already significant commercialization of Nob Hill Boulevard, is what prompted the Yakima Urban Area Planning Commission to recommend to the Joint Boardthat the future land use designation of this land be changed to permit commercial zoning at this location. Thus while there may be no compelling public need for the rezone, it is nevertheless consistent with public planning policies. h. Public comment. Public comments were addressed in the context of the other rezone review criteria. Public comment was received regarding the economic viability additional retail facilities in the area, but the economic viability is a matter to be judged by the applicant in determining to pursue a development. 11. Analysis of Class(2) Application a. Class (2) review criteria. Presuming the rezone application to be approved, the 24 -hour operation of a grocery store is subject to Class (2) review. The administrative official's decision in Class (2) review must comply with the objectives of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan, the intent of the zoning district, and the provisions and standards established in the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. b. YUACP Compliance. Development of a grocery store is clearly consistent with Neighborhood Commercial future land use designation as discussed in the rezone section. So long as the 24 -hour operation does not interfere with integrity of the nearby residential neighborhoods, Plan compliance is not at issue. The site plan locates the store structure approximately 200 feet from the residences across South 42 Avenue. The school across South 44 Avenue is not in use after 10:00 p.m. as a general proposition. No evidence of conflict as a result of the 24 -hour operations has been HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -7 presented, presuming the installation of appropriate sitescreening provisions and compliance with other traffic safety conditions. c. Intent of the Zoning District. Development of a grocery store is clearly consistent with the intent of the zoning district in as much as the intent is set forth in YMC 15.03.030.8 as follows: "Uses in this district should be retail or personal service establishments dealing directly with the consumer, the primary occupants usually being a supermarket and drug store." d. Development standards. (1) Parking. The proposed new supermarket will be 79,600 square feet in size. The parking standard for supermarkets is four spaces for every 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Based upon this standard a total of 211 parking spaces are required and 621 parking spaces are indicated on the site plan. (2) Required Landscaping of Parking Areas. Five per cent of the total parking area is required to be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of YMC 15.06.090. The final site plan for this project must indicate which areas are to be landscaped and the calculations provided to verify that the standard has been met. (3) Lighting. Lighting must be provided to illuminate any off-street parking or loading space used at night. When provided, lighting shall be directed to reflect away from adjacent properties. (4) Sitescreening. Three different standards, A, B and C, have been established to accommodate a range of sitescreening needs. Only Standards A and C are relevant for present purposes. Standard A requires a ten -foot wide landscaped planting strip with trees at twenty -foot to thirty -foot centers, shrubs, and groundcover. Standard C requires a six - foot -high, view - obscuring fence, made of wood, masonry block or slatted chain link. A three- foot -wide planting strip landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover along the outside of the fence is also required when the fence is adjacent to streets, alleys and pedestrian ways. Based upon the existing adjacent land uses and this proposed use, sitescreening standard "A" is required along the east, west and south property lines. This is due to the fact that these properties are all separated from this development by streets. Sitescreening Standard "C" is required along the north property line adjacent to the proposed use. An HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -8 eight -foot masonry wall with an interior planted buffer strip is recommended as a condition of approval along the north boundary to address compatibility of truck traffic and loading activities with current neighboring uses, thus adjusting the Standard C provisions for the subject properties. The area designated as Pad B on the preliminary site plan is designated for unspecified future development. The applicant has requested that compliance with the site screening standards on the north side of Pad B be deferred until development is actually undertaken. Timing of sitescreening installation is addressed at YMC 15.07.100: "All sitescreening required by this title shall be installed prior to occupancy or commencement of use. " Furthermore, "[No] permanent certificate of occupancy shall be issued until all required sitescreening is completed." The northern boundary of Pad B is separated from the grocery store development by approximately 150 feet. This exceeds width of an arterial street right of way. Until such time as the pad is developed, it does no violence to the purpose of the sitescreening standards to allow maintenance of the current chain link fence at that location, particularly if the current landscaping in the area of Pad B is maintained and irrigated. The final site plan must conform to the provisions of section 15.05.040 regarding vision clearance at intersections. (5) Setbacks. The building setbacks shown on the site plan comply with zoning ordinance standards. (6) Signs. The site plan indicates a 35 -foot tall pylon sign with 200 square feet of message area. This sign is to be located to the east of the access driveway from Nob Hill Boulevard. This proposed sign would be in conformance with the City's sign standards provided that the sign is located 15 feet or more from the edge of the public right -of -way. (7) Lot coverage. The lot coverage standard within the SCC zoning district is 85 per cent. According to the site plan lot coverage for this project will be less than 80 per cent. From the foregoing findings, the Hearing Examiner makes the following HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -9 CONCLUSIONS 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to conduct an open record hearing on the applications to (1) change the zoning of the properties identified in the findings from R -3 to SCC and (2) construct a 79,000 square foot supermarket with 24 -hour operations on such properties, and to make a recommendation on the applications to the Yakima City Council. 2. The requirements for public notice of the applications and the hearing were satisfied. 3. The subject property is suitable for some of the uses permitted under the proposed zoning so long as the uses comply with applicable design and development standards set out in the Yakima Municipal Code. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the amendments to the Future Land Use Map approved by the city and county legislative bodies on August 20, 2002. 5. The proposed amendment complies with the intent of the zoning ordinance so long as the applicant demonstrates the availability of sufficient traffic capacity on the affected streets to support the range of potential uses in the proposed district. 6. The proposed amendment does not present any substantial incompatibility with neighboring land uses so long as actual uses comply with the design, development and review requirements in the Yakima Municipal Code, the applicant proceeds consistently with MDNS conditions, and the applicant installs previously described eight - foot masonry walls and vegetative buffer strips along the northerly property boundaries. 7. Public facilities are adequate at the site to support the proposed use and other possible Light industrial uses of the property, so long as supported by an appropriate transportation capacity analysis. 8. The rezone is in the public interest and is an appropriate action for implementing comprehensive plan amendments, subject to conditions. 9. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket complies with the objectives of the YUACP. 10. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket complies with intent of the SCC zoning district. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -10 11. The proposed construction and operation of a 24 -hour supermarket, subject to certain conditions, complies with applicable development standards in the urban area zoning ordinance. 12. In view of the preceding conclusions, the project meets consistency requirements set forth in YMC 16.06.020. From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner makes the following RECOMMENDATION The applications to rezone properties from R -3, Multiple Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center and to construct a 24 -hour supermarket on the SCC- zoned properties should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The plan of development, as represented by the submitted general site plan shall be substantially complied with. 2. An additional 25 feet of right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along N. 42n Avenue for the combined length the of western boundary of the all the parcels included in the project site in order to render the street compliant with city street standards. This right -of -way shall be improved with curb, gutter and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk; 20 feet of asphalt paving to 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet past centerline for a 20 -foot wide section with controlled drainage. 3. A streetlight shall be installed at the intersection of South 44 Avenue with W. Nob Hill Blvd. The signal must be approved by the City Engineer and meet all MUTCD standards. The intersection will need be re- striped to denote appropriate items such as a cross -walk will be marked across all street frontages; handicap curb ramps be installed at all crosswalks; stop -bars painted in locations consistent with MUTCD. The traffic signal to be installed will be compatible with the City of Yakima NEMA standards. 4. Where necessary, additional right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along S 44 Avenue to assure that there is a full 25 feet of right -of -way from centerline. This frontage shall be improved with curb, gutter, a 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and asphalt paving for 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet over centerline and a street light at the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -11 5. The sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed new building site must be relocated, subject to prior review by Public Works. 6. The Drainage Irrigation District #40 lines running through this site are owned and operated by Yakima County. The applicant shall contact Yakima County Public Works concerning the relocation of these lines. 7. All stormwater shall be retained and managed on site unless the applicant enters an agreement with an authorized stormwater management utility to manage stormwater offsite. 8. Site screening standard "C ", where applied, shall require an eight -foot tall masonry block wall and an interior planting strip. 9. Until such time as the area designated as Pad B on the preliminary site plan is developed, the current chain link fence on the northern boundary of Pad B may be retained, so long as current landscaping in the vicinity is substantially maintained and irrigated. 10. The north and south approaches on South 40 Avenue/West Nob Hill Boulevard intersection will be changed to a split phase operation and the center southbound lane will be converted from a through lane to a shared through/left lane. The applicant is responsible for the replacement of the traffic signal heads on the southbound mast arm, including a new 4- section signal head and a standard left turn head. 11. A Crossing Agreement shall be obtained from the City of Yakima for access to this site across the City -owned YVT property. 12. Permits must be obtained from the City of Yakima for all grading, construction and signs. All signs are to be installed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the zoning ordinance. 13. All project permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. 14. A final site plan is required showing any changes or conditions contained herein prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning review. 15. The development of the properties shall otherwise comply with all conditions set forth in the MDNS dated July 31, 2002 (File No. UAZO EC #11 -02). HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -12 DATED THIS 3 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 200 P•, RICK D SPURGIN HEARING EXAMINER P * ' M HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION -13 SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER A Staff Report EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE A -1 Staff Report 8 -22 -02 City of Yakima, Washington Division of Environmental Planning PUBLIC HEARING August 22, 2002 Master Application submitted by: ) Staff Report UAZO RZ #3 -02 Skyland Company, Inc. ) UAZO CL (2) #21 -02 EC #11 -02 for a Rezone from R -3 to SCC; the ) Staff Contact: 24 -hour operation of a Supermarket ) Bruce Benson within the SCC Zoning District; ) Senior Planner and Environmental Review. ) 575 -6042 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the approval of this master application subject to the conditions stated herein. From the view of the site, the matters contained in the application, Development Services Team comments, and a review of both the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (UAZO), staff makes the following: FINDINGS APPLICANT. Skyland Company, Inc. Box 400 Woodburn, OR 97071 LOCATION. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue PARCEL NOS. 181327 - 24028,21019 & 24020. Filed Hearing Examiner g ' Z Z o2- EXH # A- Date_ _. "..y.v.... Skyland Company, Inc. File 2 .3 "a2-- 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; 07. ttZ -n2 . rr. (2) #21 -n2 . Fr APPLICATION. This is Master application combining a project specific rezone of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. It is being requested in connection with the construction of new supermarket planned for the adjoining lot to the south and already zoned SCC. This rezone will permit the expansion of the supermarket onto this site as well as allow for the possibility of other commercial enterprises in the future. Supermarkets are a permitted Class (1) land use within the SCC zoning district. However, when a supermarket chooses to remain open for business after 10:00 pm or to reopen before 6:00 am it is required to undergo Class (2) land use review. Class (2) land uses are considered normally permitted if, after public notice and administrative review, the issues related to compatibility have been resolved. The final application concerns environmental review, a requirement of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). SEPA operates under a series of thresholds based upon specific criteria set forth within the act. The thresholds, which triggered this particular review, include a building larger than 12,000 square feet in area and a parking lot with more than 40 parking spaces. CURRENT ZONING AND LAND USE. The subject property consists of three parcels, two of which are currently zoned R -3, Multi - family Residential and one is zoned SCC, Small Convenience Center. The Assessor's plat map suggests that the two R -3 parcels are in reality a single parcel. The map has a "DS" notation, which indicates a district segregation used for taxing a single parcel located within two taxing districts. 2 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7. to t_n7 . CT. (7 Adjacent properties have the following characteristics: Location Zoning Existing Land Use North R -3 Multi- Family Residential East R -3 Multi - Family Residential West R -1 Public School South R -1, R -2, B -2 Commercial /Residential BACKGROUND Prior to this application the most southerly property was in use as a drive -in movie theater and the northerly property contained 32 apartments units built in the early 1970's. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE. This rezone request complies with the Commercial Goals (Page III - 13) section of the plan to, "Provide convenient shopping locations consistent with the development of the community." URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE. The purpose and intent of the Small Convenience Center District (SCC) is to: a. Provide areas for commercial activities outside the central business district that meet the retail shopping and service needs of the community; and b.b. Accommodate small commercial centers, generally three to ten acres in size, where most of the commercial uses have located in a coordinated manner around a common parking lot. Small convenience centers serve the day -to -day convenience shopping and service needs of the surrounding neighborhood and should be designed to minimize the undesirable impacts of the center on the neighborhood it serves. Uses in this district should be retail or personal service establishments dealing 3 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7. #1-07. rT. 121 *91-09. Re #11-09 directly with the consumer, the primary occupants usually being a supermarket and drug store. REZONE CRITERIA. Within the Yakima Urban Area, recommendations for the approval of rezone applications are governed by seven criteria specified in Section 15.23.030 YMC. 1. Testimony at public hearing. Testimony at the public hearing is crucial in determining compatibility for any proposed land use change. 2. Suitability of property for proposed use. This rezone will enlarge, and be developed with; the existing SCC zoned property to the south, thereby, creating a property large enough to be well suited for the use proposed by the developer. 3. Recommendations from interested agencies. No agencies are opposed to this rezone. 4. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map (Map III -3) designates the subject property as Neighborhood Commercial, a designation that fully supports the requested rezone from R -3 to SCC. 5. Adequacy of public utilities. This property is currently served by all necessary public utilities. Although this development is located within the service area of the Nob Hill Water Company the City of Yakima will be providing the public water utilized for this development. 4 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7. #'t -n7 . rr, (71 #71 -n7 . pr #11-n? 6. Compatibility of proposed use. The rezoning of the R -3 properties to SCC is supported by Future Land Use Map III -3, which designates this area as Neighborhood Commercial. In turn, Neighborhood Commercial properties, as shown by Figure III -3 of the Comprehensive Plan, are determined to be fully compatible with the Small Convenience Center zoning designation. 7. Public Need /Change in Circumstance Currently within the City of Yakima there is an inadequate supply of vacant commercially zoned property located within easy reach of public utilities. This need for more ready -to- build commercial property, when viewed in conjunction with the already significant commercialization of Nob Hill Boulevard, is what prompted the Yakima Urban Area Planning Commission to recommend to the Joint Board that the future land use designation of this land be changed to permit commercial zoning at this location. ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The zoning ordinance sets forth specific standards for lot size, maximum lot coverage, minimum building setbacks, parking, building height, sight screening, etc. This proposal meets all applicable zoning ordinance development standards. Parking. The proposed new supermarket will be 79,000 square feet in size. The parking standard for supermarkets is four spaces for every 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Based upon this standard a total of 211 parking spaces are required and 621 parking spaces are indicated on the site plan. 5 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7 }Fl-n9 cr. r21 ft21 -n2 . Fr tt11 -n2 Required Landscaping of Parking Areas. Five per cent of the total parking area is required to be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 15.06.090 YMC. The final site plan for this project should indicate which areas are to be landscaped and the calculations provided to verify that the standard has been met. Lighting. Lighting shall be provided to illuminate any off - street parking or loading space used at night. When provided, lighting shall be directed to reflect away from adjacent properties. Sitescreening. Sitescreening requirements vary depending on the intensity of both the proposed use and its neighbors. Three different standards, A, B and C, have been established to accommodate a range of sitescreening needs. STANDARD A - -A ten -foot wide landscaped planting strip with trees at twenty -feet to thirty -feet centers, shrubs, and groundcover. STANDARD B - -A three-foot-wide planting strip that will create a living evergreen screen at least six feet in height within three years. STANDARD C - -A six - foot -high, view - obscuring fence, made of wood, masonry block or slatted chain link. A three - foot -wide planting strip landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover along the outside of the fence is also required when the fence is adjacent to streets, alleys and pedestrian ways. All sitescreening shall conform to the provisions of section 15.05.040 regarding vision clearance at intersections. 6 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; P7 # '1-117 _ car. (7\ #71 -n2. P1' *11-07 Based upon the existing adjacent land uses and this proposed use sitescreening standard "A" is required along the east, west and south property lines. This is due to the fact that these properties are all separated from this development by streets. To the north the immediately adjacent property is zoned R -3, Multi- Family Residential. In this case site screening standard "C" is required along the north property line. Additionally, due to the close proximity of the loading docks and freight driveway with the adjacent apartments, staff is recommending that masonry block be used in meeting site screening standard "C." Staff also feels that the height of the fence should be, extended from six feet to eight feet in height to provide a similar type buffer as is located along the east and north property lines of the S 40 Avenue and Tieton Drive Albertson's store. Setbacks. The building setbacks shown on the site plan comply with zoning ordinance standards. Signs. The site plan indicates a 35 -foot tall pylon sign with 200 square feet of message area. This sign is to be located to the east of the access driveway from Nob Hill Boulevard. This proposed sign will be in conformance with the City's sign standards provided that the sign is located 15 feet or more from the edge of the public right -of -way. Lot coverage. The lot coverage standard within the SCC zoning district is 85 per cent. According to the site plan lot coverage for this project will be less than 80 per cent. 7 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7 ( ) ft71 -n7 . R!` 1 11 -n2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM (DST) REVIEW. The DST meeting for this proposal was held on July 17, 2002 at which time the following comments were submitted. City Engineer 1. This site fronts on W. Nob Hill Boulevard. classified as a Principal Arterial. The right -of -way requirement for this classification is 100 feet wide, 50 feet on each side of centerline. The existing right of way is approximately 41 feet wide. An additional 9 feet of right of way should be deeded to the City for a total of 50 feet. 2. Nob Hill Boulevard is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. These improvements should remain until the City Widens this arterial. 3. The site also fronts on N. 42 Avenue classified as a local access street requiring 50 feet of right of way. The existing right of way is 25 feet wide. An additional 25 feet of right of way needs to be deeded to the City to comply with Title 12. This fifty -foot right -of -way should be improved with curb, gutter and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk; 20 feet of asphalt paving to 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet past centerline for a 20 foot wide section with controlled drainage. A streetlight should be installed at the intersection with Nob Hill Boulevard. 4. The site also fronts on 44 Avenue a local access street. Engineering questions the width of the existing right of way. As part of this proposal, additional right of way should be deeded to the City to assure a 25 -foot wide right of way from centerline. This frontage should be improved with curb, gutter, a 5 -foot wide sidewalk, a streetlight at 8 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7. *1-n7 rr. 171 ii71-n7. Fr the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard, controlled drainage and asphalt paving for 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet over centerline. 5. Sanitary sewer exists in S 44 Avenue and through the building site. The line through the building site must be relocated. 6. There are DID lines running through the site (DID 40). These lines are owned and operated by Yakima County. The applicant should contact Yakima County Public Works concerning relocating or affecting these lines. Traffic Engineering Having reviewed the Kittelson & Associates Traffic Study (May, 2002) for the Proposed development of a 79,000 square foot grocery store and a 4,000 square foot retail pad, as well as the site plan prepared by J -U -B Engineering (5/15/02), Traffic Engineering staff has the following comments. 1. Trip Generation Rates: Total expected traffic generated by the proposed development is 9:30 PM Peak Hour vehicle trips, as noted on Table 3 of the Kittelson Study (page 19) . The site plan prepared by J -U -B Engineering indicates Future Development Pad A at the corner of Nob Hill Boulevard and S. 42 Avenue. Although not represented as a Fast Food development, the Traffic Study, to be inclusive, modeled the impact of a fast food use at this site. The 9:30 PM Peak hour trips includes a fast food development. Once pass -by trips are factored, the new development is expected to add 790 PM Peak hour vehicle trips. 9 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; F7. tF -n2 . CT. (2) #21 -n2 . Fr 1 1 -n2 2. Pass -by Rates: The Kittelson study uses the rates recommended by the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998 which estimates an average of 25 to 30 percent of pass - by trips for a grocery store. However, this pass -by rate would assume that roughly 20 percent of the existing traffic visits the store during the PM Peak hour. To be more realistic, the Kittelson study reduced the pass -by rate to 15 percent of the total for the proposed development. Total pass -by trips are estimated at 140 Pm Peak hour trips. 3. Significant Impacts: Anticipated impacts of the new development are identified and discussed within the report. The proposed development will have a significant adverse impact on two street intersections (Nob Hill Boulevard and South 40 Avenue; as well as Nob Hill Boulevard and 44 Avenue (Page 2, Executive Summary). The development is directly adjacent to an elementary school and near the patrolled school crossing (page 13 of the study). Both 42 and 44 Avenues are local access streets with incomplete or missing frontage improvements. 4. Recommendations from the study are summarized beginning on page 27. Based upon the findings of the study and site review, Traffic Engineering recommends the following mitigation measures: a. Both South 42 and South 44 Avenues should be improved to current development standards. The location of driveways shown on both streets is acceptable to Traffic Engineering. b. One driveway is proposed for Nob Hill Boulevard and is shown as a raised, channelized right -in, right -out driveway. 10 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; P7. 1 -n7. rr. 171 #71 -n9. Fr Traffic Engineering supports this concept and recommends the driveway be required to be built as shown on the site plan. c. The traffic signal proposed at Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue is a necessary mitigation measure, as documented in the traffic analysis. Without the signal, the level of service at this intersection will be reduced from the existing LOS C to LOS F. The signal must be approved by the City Engineer and meet all MUTCD standards. The intersection will need be re- striped to denote appropriate items such as a cross -walk will be marked across all street frontages; handicap curb ramps be installed at all crosswalks; stop - bars painted in locations consistent with MUTCD. The traffic signal to be installed will be compatible with the City of Yakima NEMA standards. d. The existing school crossing signal located on Nob Hill Boulevard west of 44 Avenue will need to be removed. The patrolled school crossing will be moved to signalized intersection of 44 Avenue and Nob Hill Boulevard. pending approval by the Yakima School district. If the crossing is to be maintained, the applicant should also install school zone flasher units consistent with the RCW 46.61.400(1), which denote the beginning and end of the 20 mile per hour speed limit when flashing. The zone is 300 feet to either side of the crosswalk. The eastern terminus of the school zone will be approximately the Nob Hill entrance to the grocery store. e. The north and south approaches on South 40 Avenue /West Nob Hill Boulevard intersection should be changed to a split phase operation and the center southbound lane should be converted from a through lane to a shared through /left lane. The applicant should be responsible for the replacement of 11 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7. i'l_n2. CT. (71 fi21 -02. Fr ii -m the traffic signal heads on the southbound mast arm, including a new 4- section signal head and a standard left turn head. The City of Yakima will supply the appropriate signs for the mast arm and make the timing changes in the controller. Water & Irrigation City of Yakima domestic water is available at this location. Irrigation water is also available at a base rate charge of 9 per square foot of total lot area. Wastewater Underground utilities will need to be relocated so they are not building over the storm and sanitary sewer systems. They need to be located where building and expansions will not impact them. Relocation of utilities needs to be accessible for maintenance and approved by the City. Building Codes Storm runoff shall be maintained on site. Codes - Addressing The existing address of 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard will be retained. Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority With reference to the Environmental checklist question: Background Question #4 - 1.YRCAA regulations require proponents to file with, and gain approval from YRCAA, a dust control plan to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases in this project if the proponent should decide to build per §3.08 of YRCAA Regulations. The fee for a 12 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; P7. #1 -2 . rr. (71 #71-n7 . pc' 11 - n2 construction dust plan is $205. Proponent is encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for the year 2002. 2. Building that require demolition or renovation where asbestos could be disturbed, a Notification of Demolition and Renovation to be filed and approved by YRCAA is required. An asbestos survey must be completed, and all asbestos removed prior to demolition, per §3.07.F, G and H YRCAA Regulations. 3. New Source Review (NSR) §4.02 of our Regulation 1. This project will be required to go through NSR to determine applicability and thresholds. The cost to review a NSR is $315. Environmental Elements Air - 1. §B2c - effective control of dust is required at all times during site preparation, construction and landscaping phases of the project. No other comments were received TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY. The Traffic Concurrency review for this project was completed on August 8, 2002. Based upon the information provided by the applicants this development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City Arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted streets. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT. On July 31, 2001 the City of Yakima issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for Environmental Checklist #11 -02. The required 20 -day comment period preceded the 13 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; P7 itl -n2. CT. (7) t21 -m Fr #11 -n2 issuance of this MDNS. Mitigation measures area as outlined in the Traffic Engineer's comments. YVT RIGHT - OF - WAY CROSSING AGREEMENT. The City of Yakima owns a 20 -foot wide strip of land located to the north of Nob Hill Boulevard and paralleling the south boundary line of the subject property. A Crossing Agreement approved by the City of Yakima and recorded is required to access this property from Nob Hill Boulevard. PUBLIC NOTICE. Notice for this hearing was provided in accordance with the UAZO requirements in the following manner: Mailing of hearing notice July 5, 2002 Posting of property August 1, 2002 Legal Ad published August 2, 2002 CONCLUSIONS. 1. The hearing examiner has jurisdiction. 2. During project review it has been determined that this request is in compliance with section 16.06.020(B) YMC for making a Determination of Consistency as follows: a. The density of the development is not a factor with this application. b. Supermarkets open 24 -hours per day are a Class (2) permitted use within the SCC zoning district. c. Adequate public facilities are available to serve this site. 14 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7 it1 -m . rr. (71 #21 - n2 . pr d. The proposal is consistent with the development standards of the zoning ordinance. 3. The proposed use does not conflict with the goals and objectives of The Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. 4. This rezone is compatible with future land use map III -3 and land use compatibility chart III -2 of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. This development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City Arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all streets impacted by this development. 6. No adverse impacts have been identified from granting this approval. 7. SEPA review resulted in the issuance of a MDNS on July 31, 2002. Mitigation measures were as was recommended by Traffic Engineering. 8. Public Notice for this hearing was provided in full accordance with zoning ordinance requirements. 9. Currently, within the City of Yakima, there is an inadequate supply of vacant commercially zoned property with public utility access. 10. Approval of this rezone master application will have the following public benefits: increased investment in the local economy, increased tax base with the improvement of the property, and increased employment opportunities. 15 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44` Avenue UAZO Master Application; P7. #l-n7 . CT. (71 #71 -m . Pr #11-n? RECOMMENDATION. The Division of Environmental Planning recommends that this master application consisting of a rezone from R -3 to SCC and Class (2) review for a 24 -hour supermarket within the SCC zoning district be approved subject to the following conditions. 1. That the plan of development, as represented by the submitted general site plan, be substantially complied with. 2. An additional 9 feet of right -of -way should be deeded to the City along Nob Hill Boulevard for a total of 50 feet. 3. An additional 25 feet of right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along N. 42 Avenue. This right -of -way shall be improved with curb, gutter and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk; 20 feet of asphalt paving to 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet past centerline for a 20 -foot wide section with controlled drainage. A street light shall be installed at the intersection with Nob Hill Blvd. 4. If necessary, additional right -of -way shall be deeded to the City along S 44 Avenue to assure that there is a full 25- feet of right -of -way from centerline. This frontage shall be improved wir.h curb, gutter, a 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and asphalt paving for 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet over centerline and a street light at the intersection of Nob Hill Boulevard. 5. The sanitary sewer line crossing the proposed new building site must be relocated. 16 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44` Avenue UAZO Master Application; R7 1 -n7 rr. (9 ) #71 -n7 . Rf #11 -n7 6. The Drainage Irrigation District #40 lines running through this site are owned and operated by Yakima County. The applicant shall contact Yakima County Public Works concerning the relocation of these lines. 7. Site screening standard "C ", where applied, shall require an eight -foot tall masonry block wall. 8.A Crossing Agreement shall be obtained from the City of Yakima for access to this site across the City owned YVT property. 9. Permits must be obtained from the City of Yakima for all grading, construction and signs. All signs are to be installed in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the zoning ordinance. 10. All project permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. 11. A final site plan is required showing any changes or conditions that might be required by the hearing examiner. 17 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard & 911 S 44 Avenue UAZO Master Application; 177 . #1 -117 . PT. (71 #71-n7 Pr SKYLAND COMPANY INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER B Maps / Site Plan EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE B -1 Maps: Vicinity, Mailing, Aerial, Zoning and Atlas 7 -15 -02 B -2 Site Plan 5 -17 -02 M 4U 1 14 il Pq 1 1g M 1 P 1 ' - " (CM - larl • • L -a 0.03 1 - a EEO= /-e ®,0¢ 11. i I � " i aai • 3 "` , t i .. _._. _ stc> - - -6 roac "3,2 J mew, a iwzis t9 j � 'OIC�I'&1 f3C11 •M _ ♦ _ _ ___ __ -__ _ � ppp'-"y �� __ -__ q --------4-.--- - - _ . - _ � _ _ - - .. 1/ 8 � OQ _- ysr.. -147.-T q} � I G� --� ifk A . A � -- k - � - -`j a I)%r •r r 08113 m' 14 -- -.,. - • Li . _,11_ 11 1 � 1 041 +- sass _ _ 61 , If 11pp Q � 7 E p � 1 i K > v \\ � � t mW . = la ,�,a ,� ; I 1 8 n iA ''+ fi _y 1 1 I � y g � ; O Y�'1 W „„ .c,...,� � 6a RI • ' "I I • . N �^ W ^� 333 000 _ � 11 I 4 ,a'�' \ �..- �il� �'' i § g -' ' E 1 1 _ I 1 I I l i I,u r *�" r ya i i� ! 11 !PIE .11 f I 1 : 1 ili l \+ ''!:� l 1 . pQ 1 I 1 p F _ II + 1 �(l•:1 C'i ;$44i 4 2pq nip d m4-141 I B \\ � K ` 1 1111 1 5! 6 y iM § 1 g � J 1 , AP 1j— \\ i > :, 1,1 11 I III m WW 'L I R. I!— r %_ 11111;21111 f. Iii 1p� l S"i :., � __ �. ♦ 1 == .�— � J ' gl 101 I I yp yq g ,i 1 .9L ..�� x AL ~° :.--;7' J Y":'7 .ta ^ .. .9L �� Ac S 1 1 i I ; ^' ail& II 1 1:: § 1...1:11. . li - i l(,l ` b f , ➢ % ♦v : �. " �I1I Si I I 0 I , g P P n w \c % �" 9L• iiz 6i 1 11 IV r c .. : ' \. % / /r� //. ! . o i1 - q'W 1 I tan g� Q °�n p '� y 1 ' .. iii /i�iii iii 1,.!- �sr• B pp II I R -'I,1 p 1 Ise. � , ° o - �� � . -. e1, i IIG9'# r 1 � �= �® �® o a�u 4 9 00 p 13 .161 I 1 4 I�I ; mil �Y WIPP 11 11 1 1; {i c � ' 1 4 4 - I ; �. — $ Till i St ;All tc-4 OA Jl 11111 e ME i i - e On ,rn i I $ a N - i i $ & 1 I a 11 !NIP ID A _ $ 6 < 1 B la l78'� g -II v ° C� 1 ±osl { rr F x I= �„ i = o�cs° 7.Wt3e x in T Na 4i0tN � I IP g' i 6 4 -- 0 • , ; I 1 I I. 113,.. b €€ 1 \ t Lyi: � +� p gg e �,'8B ( � I-1 /61 fl Ad G I 1 !! _ ;1 �� I il¢t e 8 n I= 1 . I 11111111' eey 9q x g I 1 It - I\I 19� g _ li s4 4* g 11 !T 1 9 .- -•r:. t $ i1 ; iii 1 _ 0°roec 3 .OFILOV N �'T , � - wi a ag B I'1) 11f 6y L� II'' p p i q I / III - , �� 1 i4 ��3 � - ' . ° §i ii iij IN ` g I 1 g � d 2 a Ill 5 i I I - 1 �: I S � I jr np l f1 . 1 . 4 I I 1 I ,` I Pm 1lij lT i1 1 s RIWIEgg 0 k , r ♦ - S / 11 I 11g a 1 � b m A sa ; 1" �i .9A N 4 1- 1 1 „ - . , ... ISL i -- I n , y.. `T I; 1i p I 1 9 > 3 ° 111 @a `I l a ' s I II1 1 I t § ® g na I � 110 Cii P81 ER s s. gg §II a 1� I I °® A( I , x 4,, Ix °I '!; 9 '113 1 I 0 LL. 00 LIJ il It 11 E 6 _ _ �. _ _ « _ _ _ _ .. x vcssu 3 .ntl.ea x .......'•• = •— ll'llil 3.Ht1.08 N W Q Q EPPF nF eRIWINng ir g i t l PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT ° J -U -B ENG/NEERS,1nc. ` g PLANS SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. �^«�° � n , • � ...Mr, • �� 2610 Wort asa/solor Avenue t IA g g sans 201 j It Y - � �� ° NQT FOR REVISION 6Y Mt Mli h'snnontck Washington 99.138 a r x YAKIMA, WASHINGTON = Phno: 509- 7509-71U-2144 11 . N0. fox! 509 -7 .16 -0790 _ DE`FD7w 1 1 I L L F I 1 LI'L) HI 1 1 PICEI I I - 111 i R -1 ,_ .r uI 1 � 1 1 _ ___ 1111 a 1 a — I 1.,, I I N i 1 a Err] =0 1 1 i [to =0 w ' 7 I �U• I P 1 ill 1i� - — (� I I i ® l , J� i n 1 Et3 ® I 11 � 's b � mi I il ' � �� � � � o 1 iii. iIIIII➢ iJIU1ll ttl�,!,lU�i� lii E, ii. 1 i 1111 [ o \ \ h - -- - i 1. I; I■ 11 11 1 /1 I 1' 1 11 I 11 III S I { ` ' fR II I ij Cpi -� ; I 1 � 1, � � � r' ' ,II ' 4� I 1 ,I : 11 III i Iii 11!11 h,1i1111 I ili lit a a 1 ,,, C _ _ NOB HILL BLVD _ j �' _ 'Nob Hill Blvd 1 C — [ 1 ' EN I _ 1 I I 1 I 1 P B — + I �ee ' 6 ' I - -- EN PL li i I 1Fi ii i y �+ W PRASCH AVE y 1 0 v / N N p Z WAY 0 I p ,. pe ,r2 I I — 1 I p - - "• — "'' — ' n VF6TSRM qME ■ e ° ° ■ F — — — p ®� 8 _, / _, , / 7-------, CLIN m N CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Scale -1 in = 4� / Information Services - GIS 0 200 400 V s FILE NO: UAZO RZ #3 -02, CL(2) #21 -02, EC#1 1-02 '� Subject Property APPLICANT: SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. aai tit REQUEST: REZONE 2 PARCELS FROM R-3 TO SCC AND Filea e - e Zonitg Boundary CONSTRUCT A 24 HOUR SUPERMARKET Hearing Ex amine Yakirr a City Limits LOCATION: VIC. S. 42ND AVE & W. NOB HILL �y q Q— 2 "/" . ° 1 - 2- l�/�H CY te,_ __......__..._._- ..._ RZ -3- 0207/15/02 File #, R-Z 4"3-a;.- (/////'/ /2/2„ //7%,"/ / / 2 ';/'<::/,•• - ./ , ///',./ 4/ -;,- - • ,- ',/,' , . / '4 ,//7%;/07// / ;', ////'0 .- ,',./// % '' / '// „ „," , .., , / ;•,,,/(,./.;,,,,,•;,</;;;;;,,,,/, ”: ',/,,,,,0/, V "//-M"//./;;/ .'''.,;.;2, „ ,:, //. ,;/ '/./.,,///-//, :/;/'; '. •• /'/,/ '/ -M/,'3!, °° P ft;';',''/, /..;;;':';' ';'//,'.///,';'///%.',,,;-/i;%.W///,:':;',:•'-'.;•%',:•.,"-W*;••,,,,!,;:;'.',/,;.-,•, 2, v -:.V; / ///•,,'-%;://4%; :"...;.' ///;/;/-/:-////' :,/" //2.; ';: ;.' /'/.,-,../ '//".•.-•;/// -; /,//;;/0-,-319,";,:/.-,,;.';',` •..ii;16.(:%ffa v /7,777;7-/ , /z;; , , , / , :,'•:::',', ,'-i: ',;., '.;;;',,,";::,;;..:::;:: //:. '2,- z7/,'/-7.,..../../..:;.7',.,:-/. siii 382 V -..,„; ,/,/, •/ /,',.; t 1 _ 4131 " ' ' 0 . % '' ' : ":: ;%'" :''':/, ri 1 il 1 1 iii 111V3 g 'g'f0" 1 W Arli St 24419/ rag x (n 24015, / i 6 / 1,1 II 1:' t t ileg m19 ,, z44-14 ; n , ,:'.,:,- :„/ ., ., ..- .',":.' /;:. • ,, : .: :,/ .'!':; .i ID 1 4 * • 24413 24468 ':::: ''. ".•;;‘,' ', C,i 11 ,II ',;,-..: n1506 , .\,---2 !ffllitlint iiret",611111111VIERM. i , , ns5o7 2,4,467z), 3,/”/,‘" ',,,,5 ii 1 , pi roll+ i 00 i i i 1 24412 lot i ill 1 ;; ra4508 1 1111111 1 II Ill i l Alit IP 11 • ' L P; . .-, '':' '21i4i:s•::: 2 I ::. ' ii iei im pi i i RI lit i i : .1 i4411 •;:i44od,,.. 1 1 141' II I 24410 4 l t I A 41 I " IL 1 ."';,; :, -' ' 3 ., „ . , • ' .•, , ; 1:' . . „; . ' , ; ,, .14111 .' il :Illu 1 Ilil III: i K 1 ii . ' '.., -., ,; % '::: :: ' . : ::".-',/'".. 'ildi 1 1 4 1 1 01 $ i l . -24 , 49 ::24102 2400 / / 3. 24004 : :, ' : ,,,;., : . :-; : ",:.:,. , : • , e , ' .., 1,;;;; r: i i ii111`. li 1 1ii i II 1,' I I , 1 ' f. 1 t it 1ii , ,, - ,1 , ..;, 41 ,1 I 11 1 l igi 11, /.?4`,170,:;,i/j: -,,...,24007/...‘,,2,4005 ,'''.',:' " ' '.: : . ' ' ,, . '," :'''''':: :: '':,.,. ' • : ".' :„' 4„I II:I i i . ;i , 14t§";; i4466 : -',,,:',::: ','% ':9?"1 23012 ,c .: ' .• ::, .:' „ . " :,. 2. ,-,' I': ' . ". /-;' // ,../. 41411 1 1.110 II ii II i, Ilil I II I, Il '-;;:. • ; 1 ';.•/;, 1 -',./, l'ois/'. - ",:;- - 1- " ; ,: :- ' "..•-; 2, ... : 2 ' .:"., ; ..(:: -;- ' :. i ,1 i ii t I :II ii I 4 1 11. * 2, , :.- ‘14,05' ',-' ;;;;::. , 1 I li g ill li II 1 '1 P i di 11 ill '' : ' " ' : • ''.-';'. "'„ . / / , .. . • : ; , ''''.. ' . :'' : . , / i . :" 1 Iti,11111, i il II IiiT11141 54 i a:„ ij ,11 : Pi i ii ir' '0111iiiiii 1 ieo p 491 : i , , ' — • ,- '. 2 , 402 '' '. „ , : , • , ./',', • : '.. • ; . , / -• '/•', /.,'. IA ,,1:1;1', ..iiii LI," I ' It 1 ;11 .: 1 ?4,407' 244"' ".. '' " ' ' • NOB HILL BLVD 1 W Nob Hill Blvd „ . . . „. . :i 31412 ' 31455 32433 ; • / ; 4101 „;,„;„ 31495 , , . ; : • 31456:: • ■ '... 31 07 5 : : 5 ' ' 31413 • ;31411 61 l'4 ' ,A '32432 32449 •, 31496 31506 , . 0 31414 . Pr 1402 a 3EN PL 4 1 31451 32434 32450 1 : .. 31497 iiii ',/ ' g' 31 452 ' ',1 " 31415 • o .. W PR CH WAY 2 0 4' i— I— = 4 W PRASCH AVE ' E' 2 in co io ml. to di d) O'Z' ' 2 0 ' 67, N WAY ‘79 ro Cd 4" <c' W STORM AVE CLIN v I CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Scale —I in = 4000 ' 25 ' ai Information Services - GIS 0 200 400 N FILE NO: UAZO RZ#3-02, CL(2)#21-02, EC#11-02 18132724019 18132724020 APPLICANT: SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. 18 13 2 7 2 4 0 2 8 V REQUEST: REZONE 2 PARCELS FROM R-3 TO SCC AND s CONSTRUCT A 24 HOUR SUPERMARKET LOCATION: VIC. S. 42ND AVE & W. NOB HILL RZ-3-02 07/15/02 •1•. 1 i 4' I, �1 - I •. ..,' j .' 11�_ i 1 �i �� � • 2 1 jam ..' -d t* ..,,. - 1 — 1 .L W AAiton St rg - -.. 1 4 # 7 ' 1 - - Q � : • r , 4. 1 -r. t - 1 r c •,. r . r • i k , rt j 4��r+ s • ".; 1 ' spa ';;, `' ' '` ' k a •' r- v ; ' iNit II P nimil, ' . ., ' `f a /it , . „ ,. I 1 -MP ' ' ' ' III. — 1 .■ ' illib • '1 ri 1 I ch.r!C , ' 11 i . . i ' :—..P.-. i ',:. • . : ' ' , , , , . , . . i . . 1 i i ,1 I 121 . T -4, . lo M - 1 1 r t • C li 1 1' 1 2 1 1 ' a w - - 1 i 1 r1.� 1 '1 F • l h.. w 1 j R r• �q_ 1 t _ 11 _ � • 1 I t 1 -tom ; V ,, s , ' 1 1 1 1 i? I � N 11 ) 1 11 416 ... 4 iir, . A _ , 1 i . - it .. I i �- . • q . r Y , . r. ; { • • l ' - ' _�, ' _ 4,1 :T, • . •.� "' e s 'r 1 _ I MF RP r 1 1 _ • 1.4a. T •� `1 T y 1 r _ t r F 4 - 4s a+ , , " k'1 1 , F" 1 i , h i, '¢ . i 1., - - - .4 _ff i 1,.. -- ' N CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON scale -I;n = 400 t #‘ Information Services - GIS goo -O(4 FILE NO: UAZO RZ #3 -02, CL(2)#21 -02, EC #11 -02 APPLICANT: SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. Subject P C O p 21 t y REQUEST: REZONE 2 PARCELS FROM R-3 TO SCC AND Zoning Boundary CONSTRUCT A 24 HOUR SUPERMARKET Yakima City Limits LOCATION: VIC. S. 42ND AVE & W. NOB HILL RZ -3- 0207/15/02 UAZO RZ #3 -02, CL(2) #21 -02, EC #11 -02 o SR Suburban Residential 1 R I Single - Family Residential SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. I REZONE 2 PARCELS FROM R -3 TO SCC AND - R2 Two-Family ily Residential �� � R-3 Multi-Family Residenti al � � B-1 Professional Business - - CONSTRUCT A 24 HOUR SUPERMARKET - B-2 Local Business -I VIC. S. 42ND AVE & W NOB HILL I HB Historical Business ! __ , 6 ' , , SCC Small Convenience Center ! - LCC Large Convenience Center 1 1 Subject Property CBD Central Business District 1 ,1•, ` 0 CBDS CBD Support _ ^ — City Limits F 1 M -1 Light Industrial 1 y M-2 Heavy Industrial Ili i O i V w w 0 • 1 NI i a U 0 1 NOB HILL BLVD - `" 1. ��� W Nob HiN Blvd ■ r Q 1 ? EN PL i -- — - 1 f � __ r -- _ _ oi yr i w r ii. � ; --c ► H WAY r-- o - <I i 1 1 _ � ` - 74 _ y - W PRASCN AVE - — I _ - • I , . ! in— -.4.• ,. o C 111 r 7—_1 " el Y _n = City of Yakima, Washington : C. 0 200 400 a LIR I IA • RZ.3-02 5 July 15 w , 2002 ' ` 'o'!os �` 165 ece eps ere _ - I 1 Current ,. \ Yakima 4676 4164 4152 e5 D_ c , 4409 4487 4467 4101 Zoning - ,��, Water & Sewer w.a,i:. s' e. oo e. oow S. o e. 0 4215 4171 4,2 4 ed 9t2 - - - - - 1 N i I -- pc � 9c4 3c4 9i 4 c 3_1 4 - .— - -_ _ __- c! > 3:i i51 — - — CURRENT ZONING O ° N Water Line - 9::: 8551 966 A 9 c t A 3[7 _ tt . t- -- r A 3• 9 . 6 e A 3:.3 ■ ' �li �� jr 1 y a e 9,.r V 816 8,;9 77! SR Suburban Reside ° s 1 14 tt 8'e i N i, III ' i ° _ 3 6 3' 3148141'2 9+ R-1 Single- Fam11y Residential ° j i !, � 1 ' . ` — e R . : :? i4 _ N Sewer Lines -- - . - 'R T 4 .. . 1.4) 1 I,Ij t1) 3' 1 e,e 9 ] 515 R-2 Two-Family Residential : cE I 1 ij I ilt.'' I ) 3, i E l . ;1 qr.; 3 i l jr r , _ 8 .-- a � 99 - __-..` 1f { ,' l Kri )1 j '.:1{ ,i � r p - - _ _ . � 3s , i , i ) I li 1 _ — _ - M em 3.5 3-e III R- Multi- Family Residential a un 1:I e, 111, 1s,1 j,. (,, , )i �;` !i _ N Irrigation ain I 3'i Dzz 1 , ,! `}I0)I �� l, 1; : i j� r t �'. I�k� it .- - 3r .� .•- - 3 , 2 B 1 Professional Business 1° I v ! ! } Ih7• t .: I < — — oes loot o6a ! I ��1, ,0, �i,I ,� :�! �1� )'I f � �! _ aes B� Local Bu siness . 1 1 1i , # ,, 1 I'.1'11 ! ` .;I I 1. :1� 9 ,l ' II1' I I ; k ll , 13I le , II, - _ I 62 064 ''id ' 1 i 2 1 ` I I �� i; r r II i , - 1 HB Historical Business '' 1 I! i ! / r II 1 I f { - 0 0 ` - - 4 - : au 1012 I j ` ' K7�{ j i I ! j a s ° ° ;1 SCC S ma ll C onven i ence C ente r 4411 _ , y S 1 l S + ! j ' ,1 , i � ,' o -,,is ,615 1111 - � ''1' , *, . d , 1' 3; - - - - • LCC Large Convenience Center ' .', ' � !4 1 1 l! N.', , 1:::. i ' 41* p . 9 1020 pr ■ CBD C e ntra l B us i ness District ° ; . 11� 11,d01 ) ! j ' j 1 1 i1 ; � 3 I ( ;� - ,,; - ,'1� I. I , 11 jE I! ' 3iIll i ll.li'14, Iil,i _ NOB HILL BLVD _ __ 1�...iiiif CBDS CBD Support 8 gCg Fp - . • • ' ' a -- — n - 6' ' I 40Y 1 112 00 ° 4w 1 4 , ' 4w2 4s I 1113 11N J 72 2 M 2 H avy Industrial A ° • 411 11K 4214 M 1 Li ht Industrial 4r10 1D 1151 I 11Y — _ - ' 1112 --2: 11Y ! - - 1102 -11--1- ^o- - I 11K I 111 1114 2 11111 1 <I 1110 -- —8 ¢ o 11Y I r - � 1110 1 11151 - -- -- ° ._. tL - Iii z - - r � - - r a ° o FILE NO: UAZO RZ #3 -02, CL(21 #21 -02, E' no 1111 l I m —1 1114 8. /y, APPLICANT: SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. 1111 I h - m7 1112. • 1111 ! / I - - I_�) H---i 1 Future / \ �'�!" 1r �}}' _ MI Digital 7 H - - 1 -- - -- I L an d Use $ 's rte -,1C 1 . . _ . r .. .. • - I , j I I I I. Orthophoto 1 ._ - • s : 5551.- ,f w • r, , - _ Mosaic of Digital +t >•• e • --- � • Orthophotography a r . , flown 03/(2/94 N 1 , _ . e _ � p,t1Llr' , t F UTUR E LAND USE A 1 - - . '� 1 I NKS li t ,14 4 i F � ..'..1'1%, t,lltr {( z a r • Low Density Residential l � .. i3 4 t f Medium Density Residential R i H ) t i � , 1- • ; r • 1111 High Density Residential 1 : %,,,,,c.,... )---.. Professional O ffice �+ 1 i .. ■ Neighborhood Commercial a } #' q + f 11'11 0 _ ' - i i t ,l', R . ... , . • ■ Large Convenience Center .. ) Arterial Commercial - -1,, _ is CBD Core Commercial t y 1 i CITY OF Y A K I M A . . .--) , , 1 j ter a BLVD --j l DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND IndusIndustrial al + \ NO8HN1D t , _ - duo ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 1 i I ... — •.... Urban Reserve . - — �+ -* r IC Or 1 /' y 1 = ' ; ... �` 1 129 North Second Street J ' • y 1 j . I Yakima, Washington 98901 w * Phone: (5091575 -6113 { ¢ r i , R+ ` % 1 � - ° — �: ( a N* • ai z 1.�./� • • a w. • Fax: (5091575 6105 z _i ly j y A. . � ~ �� i ' ,111 All maps shown at " = 00ft - sho 1 4 I fl ' , 4- r- . 1. : • l b O ne page Atlas: rz -3 -02 — "°l ull �T ffftr$��SSS - Created: July 15, 2002 SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER C DST Comments EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE C -1 Request for Comments 7 -1 -02 C -2 Agencies Contacted 7 -1 -02 C -3 Comments from Max Linden, City Wastewater Division 7 -5 -02 C -4 Comments from Kevin Callow, City Engineering Division 7 -17 -02 C -5 Comments from Carolyn Belles, City Code Administration 7 -3 -02 C -6 Comments from Preston Shepherd, Nob Hill Water Co. 7 -3 -02 C -7 Comments from Les Ornelas, Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority 7 -10 -02 RECEIVED RECEIVED I r. . - jUL 1 0 2002 TClean J L 1 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA ma Regional CITY OF YAKIMA Spot s . ' oaliSt., Suite 1016, Yakima, WA 98901 Air Authority 'LpsN NiNu UIV Phone: (509) 574 -1410, Fax: (509) 574 -141 1 http://www.co.yakima.wa.us/cleanair July 9, 2002 Doug Maples, Planning Manager City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development City of Yakima 129 N. 2 St. Yakima, WA 98901 RE: UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, UAZO EC #11 -02 Supermarket and Small Convenience Center Dear M�0.4apte These are our commen for your Development Services Team and Environmental Checklist on the UAZO RZ #3 -02, (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02, for the proposed Supermarket and Small Convenience Center to be located at 4309 W. Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, WA. Reference is to the Environmental Checklist: BACKGROUND QUESTION #4 - 1. YRCAA regulations requires proponent to file with, and gain approval from YRCAA, a dust control plan to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases cited in this project if the proponent should decide to build, per §3.08 of YRCAA Regulations. The fee for construction dust plan is $205. Proponent is encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for the year 2002. 2. Buildings that require demolition or renovation where asbestos could be disturbed, a Notification of Demolition and Renovation to be filed with and approved by YRCAA is required. An asbestos survey must be completed, and all asbestos must be removed prior to demolition, per §3.07.F, G and H of YRCAA Regulations. 3. New Source Review (NSR) §4.02 of our Regulation 1. This project will be required to go through NSR to determine applicability and thresholds. The cost to review a NSR is $315. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS AIR - 1. §B2c - Effective control of dust is required at all times during site preparation, construction and landscaping phases of the project. Thank you for your continued support. With your help and those of others we can continue to have clean an healthful air quality in Yakima County. Since - -ly, _ _..._..._.._ Hied / '' jog Examiner L -s •r - as 7- --O�- Air Pollution Control Officer - Dat ` J cc: Jonathan Burtnett, Skyland Co., Inc. "'""" "`" Gary Pruitt, YRCAA Enforcement Officer / chasm /wpfiles/ permitting /SEPA/City_of_ Yakima / Maples_ UAZO_ RZ# 3- 02_ CL# 21- 02_EC #11- 02_Supermkt_ConvCnt r_09ju102 Jul -03 -02 01:03P P.02 RECEIVED JUL 0 3 2002 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF VAkiMA PLANNING DIV TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team DATE: July 1, 2002 FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application submitted by Skyland Co., Inc. and concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 PROPOSAL: The rezoning of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Class (2) review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning District, and combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces. LOCATION: Property in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. PARCEL #: 181327- 24019, 24020, and 24028 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held July 17, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e -mail address is bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575 -6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575 -6042. COMMENTS: P!z. f t-= fZ r Y / C.C. t� C S r/? V IT P 8 Y � r v Krtt-' w4 1 z G`S 9' .O N G- S'/-{-- L 9" t+ c_.- Al 0 B /-F i i G c- A 7 L ,4 • AJ Contact Department / Agency Filed Hearing Examiner EXH # 0 4 , Date ,�'"� � File # ,I Z 43 'o� RECEIVED REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Jul- 6 3 2002 TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. DATE: July 1, 2002 FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application submitted by . Skyland Co., Inca and concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 PROPOSAL: The rezoning of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Class (2) review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning District, and combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces. LOCATION: Property in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. PARCEL #: 181327- 24019, 24020, and 24028 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held July 17, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e -mail address is bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575 -6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575 -6042. COMMENTS: ,�� /�� 1/(6,4J agy co-,_,6 • / iffb Contact r 1 Filed Department / Agency Hearing Examiner ,5 / -3 ' °)-- EXH # C Date _....__. File # Z� "dY CITY OF YAKIMA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: July 17, 2002 TO: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner FROM: Kevin Callow, Development Engineer RE: SKYLAND CO. INC. Based on my review of this proposal, I have the following comments: This site fronts on W. Nob Hill Blvd. classified as a Principal Arterial. The right of way requirement for this classification is 100 feet wide, 50 feet on each side of centerline. The existing right of way is approximately 41 feet wide. An additional 9 feet of right of way should be deeded to the City for a total of 50 feet. Nob Hill Blvd. is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk. These improvements should remain until the City Widens this arterial. The site also fronts on N. 42 Ave. classified as a local access street requiring 50 feet of right of way. The existing right of way is 25 feet wide. An additional 25 feet of right of way needs to be deeded to the City to comply with Title 12. This fifty foot right of way should be improved with curb, gutter and a 5 -foot wide sidewalk; 20 feet of asphalt paving to 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet past centerline for a 20 foot wide section with controlled drainage. A street light should be installed at the intersection with Nob Hill Blvd. The site also fronts on 44 Ave. a local access street. Engineering questions the width of the existing right of way. As part of this proposal, additional right of way should be deeded to the City to assure a 25 -foot wide right of way from centerline. This frontage should be improved with curb, gutter, a 5 foot wide sidewalk, a street light at the intersection of Nob Hill Blvd. controlled drainage and asphalt paving for 16 feet from face of curb to centerline and 4 feet over centerline. Sanitary sewer is existing in 44 Ave. and through the building site. The line through the building site must be relocated. There are DID lines running through the site (DID 40). These lines are owned and operated by Yakima County. The applicant should contact Yakima Count Public Works . • o - ••• • relocating or affecting these lines. Filed • ;.: Examiner `___Date 12-z43 -a REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAX LINDEN WASTEWATER TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team RECEIVED DATE: July 1, 2002 ' ,JUL u 5 2002 FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner CITY OF YAIKIsA PLANNING DIV. SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application submitted by Skyland Co., Inc. and concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 PROPOSAL: The rezoning of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Class (2) review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning District, and combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces. LOCATION: Property in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. PARCEL #: 181327 - 24019, 24020, and 24028 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held July 17, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e -mail address is bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575 -6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575 -6042. ' F .� � �` �._ - , , P e``'`r' ,,,"'` COMMENTS: `4 44-�°0 1// p vf i ,.f �/ f ,Fe IGG�I!O;'1 ' / - a; n' el; S 7 �M „ :3 5 ; aetie - f a v2, f - ... -i., „ �,s.Y *" , c2,i �- ,;f i.-0 4 .. ' <,/ t, c, , e c a .4 GC/h ni p/..--6,-1.s t d oes. pic 0-1 ! C7C. -1 ill 7 ;i .itlee(k.L. l ii : %'tuL F * „a' F�`.-�- -GLC. .-. � r- //1/,/ F G/f/ F Contact Department / Agency , - wxaminer i /-5 -6) ” File 4 , PZ *--- - o --- DST PACKETS Applicant: S ' < Y /a^ c( C° . UAZO# tm &4c A r 4 . -;: 2 3 - o e Date of Meeting: J, ) r 7, ® z cL- (2) 4 a/ -oz ea -- it —62. City of Yakima Divisions: Codes Doug Maples .I.. � � R o a n=:Dauen o,i > F 's.' a r.uso:,',:- :,;':: i::`. .: ` ; . 1= • Traffic :E n , ` "iri ,:,'�:., t: �'J p. ,�;. ��C� Codes,.;:„ ::�• ... :,'<'`•1:'. .. ,... , ,.a.,9,., .., , r49 �';` "....,,:, . ,j. ..c . .._ , .��:,,:...r ,r,.�l....,,-t. „.. ' Joe Codes Sandy Cox Streets John Rutter ... : 511.•. `; . y '� Y: r� rol' n Belles:. 1 Parks" & +�';Recreatlon;:,�r`��`, ",.'- _ .;$,.,,:,, Ga .ter. ,u,...E� kille Engineering Kevin Callow i/ ,,3 Transit John : li•il,t; :1 ^:i —, ':i irv7., 6 j „�. ': I: + ' at /Irr ion ;.: Dave B wn ro , r t,! 'Police M ike Vowe ��4 40 Wastewater %Utilities Pete Hobbs V 5 ounty Public Works Vern Redifer • I! ire Dept,- . Mitch Cole ' t%' , ' Cou n ty Pla • ' :Stev Er `• ;:.: t..-- Fire Dept. Jeff Pfaff ✓.iy'efuse Nancy Fortier Others: 4 �Rd�9890= <:...� Rick:Di 4Z.0'�Cam " €=` =; 20 Yaki'ma•.Tieton lrri ation�'Di'strict� �;;.:.,. .P::::,,, :: �,.',.::..,.,;, 2:. ,,,,...t,._a,:�,.t.......,a.,. Nob Hill Water , Shepherd 6111 Tieton Dr. 98908 `1.04 N`':1 st=St' 9 890':1,' ; 22 : Yakima.':' ount Health.4istnct,, ; ;; ,'.: ,, • ., .. .. ,,:� :: ...:.. A rt�McKueri ' , ,.,,., ; ,,,,, �.. lo Debbie Smit 15 W w:r., . Suite 200 98902 _> 2,', .`: . .. 23 WA State Department of Ecology Yakima Ave. Suit :'1606 Prr - S t, Suite:! 9.8 ' .a:' '24 N'•Yakima Con Di Ra Vilondeecheck °. : _�. r & Light Co. Ji .:: :' �'acific Power g m Moore 1101 N 16th Ave 98902 West,: :,.1.,..—. Bake Davis =S . 8 2nd'Ave. Rm 304 98902 . ,t, ,.•,(;),_ ascade Natural Gas Co, heila Ross 401 Sheila 1 st St. 98901 �. ' ;akima,School.District #7 ..',,',‘.;'::::';''.:',', Be.Sori. _ 1 1;04 N 4 th A 98902' '` ,. ?4,A` 29 West Valley School District #208 Peter Ansingh 8902 Zier Rd. 98908 , ' a . „� �Keviri Chilcote�`'�:�.: `•� 0 >10'5. ;30 -: Charter�Communieafions;::,�,; ..:. :.:::..:. " ",:• ,,. .:. ._.., ,;_ ... ... .. ... . . 1 21. ` G ` .�: ounty Clean Air Authority Les 6 S. 2nd St. Rm 1016 t 2��Terrace e 'lb r�2 j'1 F�., "tf�'R '' „ t`e `tso' 8 �Sc�o ob r n e . V `terns < 'I� _ �32�Yakima °i S 's ;,{,,,,. _ .:9,�,,: >b,:,�, ..; b-: ,. .- .,: ±'., t.. ... � +Y!111I .. ... . - :hi Y•A..a ..,roc .., .. : rt . I:..,., ,.3s+,s,- .•M >:., .•Xti:+.�.: Ww•� iu: z.•::..Yi!I,,,:v: � • .t.;�, • 33 Yakima Greenway Foundation - Al � Brown 111 S. 18th St. 98901 ; ,.,: r 1 Iln s worth � i;t; W:!W' on ' � ,t '34':US'; >Of'fice Coleen E g � �..,.....r.: v ...,. ' �:! ,. : a... .. -. �k 3 , ? ,n 34 „r•9.', .,.. ls+:..� .. Ali. <. ::: 35 Yakima County 911 Wayne Wantland YPD 36 So,il• Distric t ; :' Ra 1Non'der , 1,. �. �.�1:6 , 06'.Perr' Sti e : Su 9 ,F.; > =4 37 Department of Wildlife Ted Clusing 1701 S. 24th Ave. 98902 7�13 Bowers�Rd E'llens 26 : : t f N r' I esourses �' 38 � De ' artmen o atu a R : , V p ; :,: 39 Department of Transportation 2809 Rudkin Rd. Union Gap, WA 98903 >Perr 'Harve ' >s�' ,` 41 Yakama Indian Nation Bill Beckley P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 9894 40::De artment. Fishenesi >:.;.•..:= ••::::'. �l�i� 8 s,. <t �'n . A�ue 890 3 :; '� . , ,.. I . =� ? 2 4 00 =s1N?Was}in o ,, 9 '42 , t Y a kima ^Air ort - "' � ... -: ;Bob" e .;.,,.: 43 Troller 5.,..,., ..: .:. ' ' 4 y Jerry Henderson 309 N. 35th Ave. 98902 Filed Hearing Examiner EXH 8 G Date. ' File #, IQZ 4 - 1 - o)_- REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team DATE: July 1, 2002 FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application submitted by Skyland Co., Inc. and concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 PROPOSAL: The rezoning of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. Class (2) review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning District, and combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building and the number of parking spaces. LOCATION: Property in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. PARCEL #: 181327 - 24019, 24020, and 24028 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held July 17, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e -mail address is bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575 -6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575 -6042. COMMENTS: Contact Department / Agency Filed Hearing Examiner EXH C'( Date 7 -1 ' 62— File# �� �—oa— SKYLAND COMPANY REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER D SEPA REVIEW EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE D -1 Environmental Checklist 5 -22 -02 D -2 Notice of Application & Request for Comments 7 -5 -02 D -3 Agencies contacted 7 -5 -02 D -4 Adjoining Property Owners notified 7 -5 -02 D -5 Affidavit of Mailing 7 -5 -02 D -6 Comment letter from Department of Ecology, Yakima, WA 7 -19 -02 D -7 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 7 -31 -02 D -8 Notice of Decision, 7 -31 -02 Compliance with the WA State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) D -9 Parties notified of MDNS 7 -30 -02 D -10 Affidavit of Mailing 7 -31 -02 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SEPA NOTICE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA Re: (it4 E! # /1 -6 )- SL y /Gnu eekn V / 71 • 1 N 4,11 ,Qlvd• I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Decision regarding a SEPA Checklist. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was mailed to public and private agencies and parties of record, which are individually listed on the mailing lists retained by the Planning Division. That said notices were mailed by me on the 31 day of Jtd ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. a r(4 - „, -- )4. (1-(e Christine Wilson Filed Hearing Examine EXH 0 1) 'i Dete , 1-31- ())- File 0, gZ 21 EC#1 / -o 7/30/02 FILE MEMO: Persons mailed Notice of MDNS on 7/31/02 Skyland Co. Inc. Dept of Ecol. Debbie Smith § Gwen Clear EPA Seattle DOE — Olympia Les Ornelas Graf Investments, Inc. Kenneth Harper Paul Anderson — JUB Engineers John McArdle List of 13 in house (mm) Filed Hearing Examiner EXH '/ ,Dad File # '_ 3' E 11-0v1 aF'YAt''�r, DEPARTMENT G . JOMMUNITYAND ECONOMIC DEV4 iPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street 1,, . .t Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575 -6183 0 Fax (509) 575 -6105 0, `R.,, NOTICE OF DECISION Compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) July 31, 2002 On July 5, 2002, the City of Yakima issued a Notice of Application regarding a SEPA Checklist submitted by Skyland Company, Inc. for the construction of a 79,000 square foot supermarket. This supermarket is to be built at 4309 W Nob Hill Boulevard, which is located within the SCC, Small Convenience Center zoning district. Following the required 20 -day public notice period and consideration of all comments received, the City of Yakima, Washington has issued the enclosed SEPA Threshold Decision. This Decision maybe appealed within 5 working days from the date of mailing (July 31, 2002). Appeals must be in writing and on forms available from the City of Yakima Planning Division, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. For further information or assistance, you may wish to contact me at (509) 575 -6042. uce Benson Senior Planner Notice of Decision Mailing Date 7/31/02 Enclosure: SEPA Threshold Decision Filed Hearing Examiner EXH I Da File g X23 —ov, Ec # 11 -02 Yakima grip 1994 WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON July 31, 2002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The construction of a 79,000 square foot supermarket located within the SCC, Small Convenience Center zoning district together with the the rezoning of approximately 3.16 acres of contiguous property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC. PROPONENT: Skyland Company, Inc. P.O. Box 400 Woodburn, OR 97071 LOCATION: 911 S 44 Avenue & 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. in Yakima, Washington. YAKIMA COUNTY TAX PARCEL NO: 181327 -21019 & 24020 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington FILE NUMBER: UAZO EC #11 -02 DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing the Environmental Checklist and related information, has determined that the project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required as provided under RCW 43.21 C.030(2c), provided measures are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures, as authorized under WAC 197 -11 -660 and YMC 6.88.160 (B)5 as supported by these findings and policies: FINDINGS: 1. The City of Yakima adopted the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary (Ordinance 97 -22) in compliance with RCW 36.70A. Municipal development standards (Ordinance 98 -64) and implementing regulations were adopted consistent with and in support of Plan policy. Project proposals consistent with the Plan, development standards, and implementing regulations are not required to undergo environmental review related to previously established policy and development regulations. 2. The proposed supermarket is consistent with the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use designation of Neighborhood Commercial. The majority of the site is currently zoned SCC, Small Convenience Center and supermarkets operating 1 Filed UAZO EC #11 -02 Skyland Company, Inc. Hearing Examiner 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. EXH # 3). .Date l - 3 1 File #X23 "oz t 6C4I1—o-- 24 -hours a day are a permitted Class (2) use in this zoning district. The remainder of the site is zoned R -3 and is concurrently being considered for rezoning to SCC. 3. This Determination is based upon the project proceeding in full compliance with all applicable regulations and standards. Deviation from established development regulations may result in a requirement for additional environmental review. 4. This property is located on the north side of Nob Hill Boulevard, a major arterial, and between S 42 and S 44 Avenues, both local access streets. 5. A new raised, channelized right -in, right -out driveway is proposed for Nob Hill Boulevard. 6. A new traffic signal is proposed at Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue. 7. Because of the proposed new signal the existing school crossing signal located on Nob Hill Boulevard west of 44 Avenue should be removed. 8. The north and south approaches for the S 40 Avenue /W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection should be changed to a split phase operation and the center southbound lane converted from a through lane to a shared through /left lane. 9. This project will require one or more permits from the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority. 10. Other conditions of approval are required of this development by the current development standards of the City of Yakima's municipal code. These standards are acknowledged by this MDNS, but are not made conditional to this determination. POLICIES: 1. Consider traffic safety and congestion in the design and site layout of new development. Policy T3 2. Establish a concurrency management system to ensure that transportation improvements, strategies and actions needed to support new development and to maintain transportation level of service standards will be in place when the impacts of development occur, or a financing plan is adopted which will fund required improvements within six years, to support the developments causing such needs. Policy T3.2 3. Major new developments may be approved when their impact on the surrounding road system is evaluated and it is shown that design capacities will not be exceeded. Policy T3.3 2 UAZO EC #11 -02 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. 4. Require traffic impact studies where appropriate to determine the need for traffic signals and other roadway improvements. Policy T3.4 MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Both South 42 and South 44 Avenues shall be improved to the City of Yakima's current development standards. The location of the driveways, as shown on the site plan, are acceptable to the City. 2. The driveway proposed for Nob Hill Boulevard is shown as a raised, channelized right - in, right -out driveway. The City of Yakima supports this concept and requires that the driveway be built as shown on the site plan. 3. The new traffic signal at Nob Hill Boulevard and South 44 Avenue is a necessary mitigation measure, as is documented in the traffic analysis. Without a signal, the level of service at this intersection will be reduced from the existing LOS C to LOS F. The signal must be approved by the City Engineer and meet all Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards. A crosswalk shall be marked across all street frontages, handicap curb ramps shall be installed at all crosswalks and stop -bars shall be painted in locations consistent with the MUTCD. The new traffic signal shall be compatible with the City of Yakima NEMA standards. 4. The existing school crossing signal on W Nob Hill Boulevard should be removed and the patrolled school crossing moved to the newly signalized intersection of S 44 Avenue and Nob Hill Boulevard. This action will need to be taken in coordination with the Yakima School District and the City of Yakima. If it is decided that a school crossing will be maintained at the new signal, the applicant shall also install school zone flasher units, consistent with RCW 46.61.400(1), which denote the beginning and end of the 20 mile per hour speed limit when flashing. The zone is 300 feet to either side of the crosswalk. The eastern terminus of the school zone will be approximately at the W Nob Hill Boulevard entrance to the grocery store. 5. The north and south approaches of the S 40 Avenue /W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection shall be changed to a split phase operation and the center southbound lane converted from a through lane to a shared through /left lane. The applicant shall be responsible for the replacement of the traffic signal heads on the southbound mast arm, including a new 4- section signal head and a standard left turn head. The City of Yakima will supply the appropriate signs for the mast arm and make the timing changes in the controller. 6. All permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained prior to any construction or demolition activities. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 3 UAZO EC #11 -02 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. This MDNS is issued under WAC 197 -11 -355, Optional DNS process. There will be no additional comment period for this MDNS. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: William R. Cook POSITION / TITLE: Director of Community & Economic Development and SEPA Responsible Official TELEPHONE: (509) 575 -6183 ADDRESS: 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 DATE: July 31, 2002 SIGNATURE: Z ' Appeals: This determi . ion may be appealed pursuant to YMC §6.88.170 to the Yakima City Council, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima WA 98901 in writing no later than five working days after the mailing of the Notice of Decision (August 7, 2002). Be prepared to make factual objections. Contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner (509) 575 -6042 for more information. 4 UAZO EC #11 -02 Skyland Company, Inc. 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. s�'arE 4, j o 4 r 6'ix y � 2 RECEIVED `� 7881 STATE OF WASHINGTON JUL 1 9 2 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 15 West Yakima Avenue, Suite 200 6 Yakima, Washington 98902 -3452 B (509) 575 -2490 CITY QF m INNING B July 18, 2002 Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Mr. Maples: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the rezone of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R-3 to SCC and the operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket, proposed by Skyland Company, Inc. We have reviewed the application and have the following comments. Toxics Clean up Based upon the historical agricultural use of this land, there is a possibility the soil contains residual concentrations of pesticides. Ecology recommends that the soils be sampled and analyzed for lead and arsenic and for organochlorine pesticides. If these contaminants are found at concentrations above the MTCA clean up levels Ecology recommends that potential buyers be notified of their occurrence. If you have any questions concerning the Toxics Clean-up comments, please contact Don Abbott at (509) 454 -7838. Water Quality This may trigger an application for a Stormwater General Permit. The applicant should contact the Water Quality program, Dept. of Ecology to assist in making the determination. If you have any questions concerning the Water Quality comments, please contact Rick Frye at (509) 575 -2821. Sincerely, / w en Clear rxr Central Regional Office ' f4lid Hearin r 597 EXH 0 T 4° - x I :, tee 7 - I g f 2 ` �Z-i3 -o2, EC II AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SEPA NOTICE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA Re: ltil L' # //-.0 S K y la n d Co .Zn • 936 GJ. /U6b 74i It 46/a I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Proposal and Request for Comments. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was mailed to public and private agencies and adjoining property owners which are individually listed on the mailing lists retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the .; day of 3C,.. ty ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. - L/ Lit t Christine Wilson Filed Hearing Examiner EXH #-I S Date,- Fife #. , 664-/V-13.7 • - ZQ - / / / - 03 'zo- £' # # OI!A • 1 o 5 - G aW® # HX3 Jeu!wex3 6upeeH PeI!J ,- p i- 1 ,I- 'S'J-!HHPH H H NN HHH rr I - r r r rr HH.H H HHHHHP H HH P-' Hr r , 11.. 1 'ro " t;: , ; ' 'E'+,... , mmmmm, mcommmmmmmmmmmmmmrorommmmmwww Wmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmm a.Nm' "': f ` �`'' 1 ' 1 H H 'F' r H; H' r H H H H H H H r H r r. H r r' 1 W: r r r r r r r. P r r P P P F' r r' r r r r r r r' r" P r li .'„ •• 0 ':, n; I . r ' v WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 0:.'-Nr. gr -'' NNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0,! mW .7.31.4,, i.1,,,,:,,4.,..,,,,,,,,:,, 7�1 ,,,,1J,,,,,.1�1,,,,,.7,,,,�IJ�7 r„:, • W Y 'It --IF : 1 1 I',..1:� 1 1 1 1 .1`.1.,'1:.1 1 1 1 1 -1 1..I 1 I I I I I .I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' . �P N NNNNN'NNNN NNINNN N NNN NNNN NN N NNN N N N NN NNW NN N N NNNN N N N 4.t . ,N •: ';. and f' �',= 44 Ot '1PiP.A A 444 IPA,P A 4 IP,PP , ,P.A 4 44 „P „P A J. A:4 4 4 W W N N NN N H - '',1 .. IP A , IP' - .1 , ,444P 4,4 44 4000OO " O ' 0 0000000;00000000 - ,P ., . �,>O i O=% a:�,' t t N N HPP.� -!r x 0 0 0 00. 0.00 W N N N N N N N W N H r H.P H H 0 0 0 0O:r O W W W W W W O 0 - y W2; Er^ .7010 .. 'J 'N 'm W N H0010 m J01 m,P NP 0 NN W _ _ ' m,P W.NH0111r,P W Nr W N i0 . 1 ft _ H0'0.7 tl i , -. z 3'3 Q . C'3 Q f H lf Z ' � T. '�a'A7f HHM , y , . 0, CZ Z OC , C 3CC ' 1i K 1Ct7� ' g XOm0Vi5' '-'::M-':, £O i: ,` 1 . : Z-, pmtd:�. ; :mMt mrHH!$'Knn.M.1 nPZHOOMroC!'£'a M 77 C HHZ ''''3' '' tr " '' ".:m �y m' m Z7. tnHHH � c + n x 39' Y ' 3 r y g g i- . ' ; ,.., U , 1 ;y, T .c;;3x1A7 Ll r R•R+ r s ' ! .c K'• ":. Y - '• " A z o o r £ G Y3 Z - v H;U P i i i .. . : k " " ": C U C ! C h 4 'tlY 4U1 to R73- H Z . - r O t }i ;,,, m ss r nm ii , dtd ' : i:' _ ."'', z ,",,:.. .: mr roB': mb x:'. - : o r " C Z z H r'Hmm3 ,:1 mn z, /, ., , •• ... Crtn-: mblR+ fnfn mHR':in mxxfi!HCO mO co n bOH 0' HHHZ ^Uimmm �H33 OmH -- P l' m O R'^ ] x x v Y : -xH 3e :ifi.Osi !7 m0035r HHmoommmR+ -'Y C '• .A rr r' tn0 O OO:U 3Wm y ;UGHR•OK m, - ';" « ? ": HHHmz7, 111HH> mnng HH 'pH CCmm Hld'3'3 ro �.O :0017z�7Hb= O ? Z t:; HHZnrGroroN, =.Y , t'b . mmr,3MZmX 33'r z m1<mHzKHrrr HxCmC -" :'.;,,.,;,., rn , -3 O MM HHv mOOKOO Z , ,q Ci Zr mzz "';''K .Ai il �. P ;; mvizz 17;pmKK K<ZHH ,h1 C CO Z taro3. C C A x H K ,• HK - ' A C a j ; �.., t, , §li ,«;,', .:.:H n11 ;'d,. t7 n' ;. romm.:..- m iy. �y H':nn00 zzm - [+1Z ":mO'.. HHm7.1 0 ,_x7.-3z,,( = ': 'l i 'i;?; - 3 J I- ' .i s } 'a]OO,OOr x1t!Hx'mOm ',mZ Z' Z 0 - 0, I i, m ;q 6 . H 3ZZ� m.•m, -. 0PJ 1< nar'ro - ,. - , ; ro r m 4 ''I] H Z 3 01PMa _ m Cm r • t f - K ,, n 'I1 ;• m zzrz.m rrxY " rzl' 'ZZ xr rCl, H H mm HOH mH 7,0 : 1 � ',. a, +t , i,C C., H t•; t7,'1 ' '< - m' ,Zm 'Z w 11 � 1 4 H . , mr . � bt ! IY' ' y] C Y Y ! i ro n n _ ; NV -1 :r 3 M n t �'- ti);:',44';',," J , Cr tf a0 - g; s, - rt b x � j:i^ :'f l:'- H ,,, .4”, - J , ! t. i ; > qH:., �'S!':i.�jrr: - ,'. "' ? N. .:..F. K -, 4 ,. .. .-4 , -4 KK mKKnmKK K kK K KK m "� ,, , , , I , ' '41 -- -'o MW Mg HHH Hnn�'I H H m HHx H H H rmHH " 0'F x , 000:0:0,0, 00000; 0.0. 0.a. ma0a00a.0a3 00.00 ? ;a ° .0.0•,,,,- m.ti'P•7'.„', -7`.^s ."L 'L:. p', p'4 00x. . �' 0''00 Y'x b'�•d: p'�' 0,,, x0'0P'P• '- ;i'F,a.r !I t, ?y,:';' 0 00 0I 0:(0' 00000 W ' : 0 : 0;0 r 00 • • 0 0 0:0 0 0tO 0 0 - w,7 00(000 0 00'0 ' 0 0: 000o0 0 0 0 00a m, ,,,!,r'm i ! . ;,= ' WWW';rt WWWWR1a'W',WWW la:la:U1,W1aWrtWWRSa,a2wrtSa(0(0 - WWm 0 , -' 'y y '''• 5 ' 0000 0 1 0 ' 00000, o 0 00 W 00; 0 000 0 7 0 , 0 0 (- 0' 0 = 00 � •` • • E . z')i. 000'e t1' , -5O,00000''0 001= - 0;0' 01 000. 70,0,0000 4,1,,W;;;,, +'; :;'; •;'+�'.' ='i 7r ;y,y+ .�• 0' -,,..: : m ; 40 _' -0 m _.::. W o:. ".,,, e ' Et;ii,•:�g: '. n FF.a01D ; a0 ire b- "1W' 404040m:m40bt0f01 (0 � 0 0 (-00'- 1- �10 0 i0'm AO10 ommomW 00 100 w W CO CO - :''r''i bi ti:):_ ,d { • -} mm'm't04ommmmml0m O'mm'mmmm m bmmmmmmmm0o(Ommmmm m o , O 'IP;' 10 o o m O I ,it. O J o a o t W o 0 40 m o 10 l m m a' m 10, ,a o m o m )040 .10 1 0 .7 0 !0 m 210 10 p : , [ ,: y . aeN " . 000 I " t;} , r OOON NOOOOONO,OOOOrtRO�000100NOO N'OOm N00000.00 OO.JJ, , I -1 i - m N N HW WN ti' CO m N N mO 0m N lDm CO H J:1 j Nm mmmm Nm ' m m,m NNH r;''t 4 % 11 , :, ' i € , pb 0 1 4i:, , ,y x7 1.�":t':ir'71 H :J' ', I 1 0.I_i . '(0','.: 1 . A4 iCi't'4'a'.. , ` 7 ! , 1 „40 H :k1 W... f'i��i W m , ;. G ° :� ' . 1 ,Q ' 1/1 m m:'= W 01 O, N I �, r .W �:'.�i " 01 '�i'..�..,.�F„„?• .1 g ' C i A (0 NN 4 COMW1 „x ?N ur. ,, fl•' 1V} j - 1; W x:1 r H 0 + W W '�, m m W �' �� O m - : m m IP 0 1 " O W W m m yL ", i?' W H nFr.� - :, H :,�1 .] >t�xJ:7 o0m ' . t i lm 0111' ?m01m 'rm +,'. ,p'W ,'' 'j,;.1i.� 4,`: ;:,;,, 1. ; 4 ,0 { °' r;'''` "*, ,;r s :. ; 1p ie1•r.; v ;r ;•, , ''4 } JY § t , . . �, r 1`3 1+ 1mi.;i•1 1 ■ I ,i l i 1, r 1 l'_ { 5, i�t Ct i F( ? y'! ti,r a ] �t ww » �a,ri: 11' 1 1 1 r ) 11 {�wl Ww .......14 a" 1 P - `� t �� r 1 y r j G � �� t'. . �I , o . i i A r ti. + l ,,, ft i Iv 'it , l 'v6 3. 1, P r i 4 'uti'3 L ` : •,,• N i . k1 t G.c 7�tw"-1i ,1 ' g l g's � � 1 V rW I t }•1t, 1 � �''„ er i '.,.8,.:, ' 1 PAW i F r` r - f; 4 a� - ( �4( 4 P>Y r " :�', :1,,, i Iy�'Ii�t t r r� Ff ��jrf<nM.E as,G "u Fi r:fi' '1 . �I v s f1�' a i1F f.' it r �, x4 it : 'PJ11 S1 r:�F, Ci-: P I 1 - �" _y E Vag 4 X711. i y, ' , ' r _ , f v E I, 2' r ' 1 , 'n fx +v 1 , 1 w 7 r } f .� :•, y5t L . s 5 €y ? 1 *4.1,-,3. ii r ff' S 'i p3 G /1- t b s t 3l'17kX 71 1 1, 1 % C '- , ' ly ?kv.` o r i ' :;>: ,. r, i; ', ' - r "� '. �n t "� r • ,:A':' ° ?' ° `1itP1"s•;a {3 i ;g1`;tt ; ' 'tt,,��(.; k ':iv r t�:r: - "` r^ S ` . ' 1 1 :' , : ;' 1.:: =4 .� ;4 s:t_,y - . r;. T'l t k. G•7 �- `1`' *r - 0 00, ':3. av ?,s i � , : t :{! <' f .v _. . + x,..a� h :� ; Q tit. .;; -i,s tis ,- , �''i r. _.. .A k1a E'l 1'� ,. ,451 y l =: � ;w ? 'i{.:"1, k`+ ` - ' .I > 7 • --r=' =. , ; ; ((0 .01 ? � t L (�• a ' 't i pv i w Vii- ', �. • i4s - - -4- y . t ,,., W '. r ii,+ ; ` , t:' . P ' r:S "r,' �, 7Fii » m �fi;,•I: ,] , N'a., - _ t',„ n P4'1 __ -?; . r 'j :, 1 ;,1e1 x ('.'1-` csr{ei-,< t4P1-1: � ir !dij, ai m, {, `;'x: °e' '° :e };E q fi r'} ,f, ".. a . � 1 <` ` p' 'I" iz?'. :-Ai . , y `.•t' ; S` -s ir;' S F� " , 3' it \ ��i4'-'1q' " 45,„ -, . 1.. 1 Y,s> tEt : ,� ir, { ' ' L�YY�: 1; i�,w: , x _ � i'v i�e'i �pt t: ; : . ,;Y ^ - ? f )l. t �; : G. C*; ': ! tss „ i t ;_3 i�;,i, - - ,, ''t 4 .- i 1;14 . °, ,.,,.. . :!;',1 m> 3�'I F'� +:'F,,, >,. ^'1.�I`n:.. .., ,,, .J:;�f'. , I .: �� . . - ` - ___. i1:: - . . , ':,it,(',,r;iV,.i ' 1r ,:i':, ,,oniJ • z atwm '''''.11,"-Y.iii'N : Ka. , 0 ,:7 - , , 027 , V3 , iv,..-. ,,, e ,,, ,'i! • VIF . . ' ,,,,,'14;' , ,.?., 40 ,,!:"V`,,:i'th tr,;[, ..,4 K ,, ,r6C. r „,,,,.,,'!''' y.o. V ibi fi.i .,i -'41■1-..o.w.". , 1“:1,,.. 4. no ;„.. ., •• :.. 6,, 7, ,,,4olz;,,,,, • , , ,, ,N•t ,,,,,, , 11-1 0- INA ,„„•., ;A,A. , , ,,,,;,,,,,■■ji:, C'-°:•„ 'C., V., .,,. „,,,,, . .., ., '':.i;' 4 . 4. i , 3e..p :::,... K , .' , •.•lc:1 ,, ■ j . r 4 r,,e';'1, NO■r:.! , SU ir. .-,p .T4r.i'' t • ,,,;,,,,,ivo,i' ,,, ,. ...,... . . 4"i'V'J,1 b14 i'i', ;•;-'..' $;0 'i'VW ,,,f,,...: 0,1if', ,:-.:, , -4. t, ,• Lt " ' `14 4740 iit`i , :3• , E , ';,5: 4 11','.' l''''.i")70W:!Pf ''',M7' 5 °(.' '410k4! ,-t:'N,O, , :i.:1:7 - Ni4:' 4 ..',1 1g100 I - .,'' ,',. ■ i :: 2 1 ..,1 ''-, ,._ ... 4 ■ 41 '.'. e '' p p ;1 C q l',41 W Vd'W ii.,:,,,I1Wt,i ivrrc:r1, ,,,,, ., •■?1 .._.,.., . „ ,.,,,, ):;,"■ 4:; 1, 'ii.1:..r . ,.'. , .: ;',Fq; -,., :.),1 ;'. ,,•?,!, !-!: 1 ,:i ■,..k:.,,,!., , ',, 7 :4-1'.A,:l r:: 1,10 ' ' '' '"' . 4 0 '4 ti ;... , 41,1:4 • t ,', ''' .''J■ ', ' '' i'.7,10 7'4e, . , , .I - , .: , 0- , - ,, , I it. t' : p!, ) .,!- ; :,.; „ ,,.,....., ,,g t. re ,■, ,,, q. ,,, '''' 0o4p . , . , r..•:, ,, ,"„i. .]:),::,,r:(z; P ,:!' , r ,, ,,I S,,,,t,•,,e,014 ;.;',P,,,'bi4 ,A,, „'...* .... , ._,„ : ;OiVr4 t ,:44,:,i;F.1:,41 ,,,,,&;.,H,:,,;! L.: ',,,,,;;■.:, 0';' .„. „.. FP v4, 2,.;J.,J.i;-7. Ve'.-o ,, ,:il,,,;!4 ..„. „„._.„ ,:,..,,,,,,i ,, :;:,,,Ii4;,4,.; ..,4 qMo.! l '*4FtV -,1',,,,,,l, „ ,,, ., '.4.■:1q e. :,:::, .,:4:pt.--:::-::- ! ..,,,, gigP 'oAv4 0,,,-„, ,:,,,!.,-,,,,., :; W.'..i.]A''' ..,....,.,.p. 1■Aqit —..--,:;;,:::. ric0.4.0:,';; :.:...1.,•• ,.. 3 .1 gnOW ., 1.. ' ;'i,: , ';:1;:,-;•, , ; Ul 0 lr1;•,. .0 ',,', , . . — - 7 P4 •1 111■0,400dt044004.4,01.0 V ■ 1 iIN • ,.', '4 1-1 m ,,,;.. mg.m' :,;,.U:i4 M,, ;;:il.,':'1, VD 10 10 AD W V l0 tO l0 W ■0 OD Ai W VD, ki) V/ g.finr,,, 4,00000 ?''' ';'. lO lD 101D101Ci U7 , 0 , 1) , /) , Dle10 (0 101D icniirdh ..'," ,:' CO C00 OirCb 4/ T U) ‘.0 i ''''.4:. ?'47-''- .':.' , .0 V) oi ol oo co co 'co 0056 CO CO 03 CCM :C0 :CO CO CO 1'S 4 - 4 V,i ;,: 00 .r.4 1! C ,P,,,T,Tgggggggggggfl C (gTOTOZZ 4007a00 q A4i, ....mm.m...,mm.). ,, . , .. , .:•-,•.:',1 al ol . a,' cnm o) co co 00 al m co in co co co co 0 co 0 co'co4.,:::,.0)Crl - 1J 4 0 0 0,00;00 0 0 0 010;0 00 0 0 ; b,,,, , 'c,,,, • .. d 0 010101010101010101010Y01001 101010 uai g4 g2.1 • '-:v00:00)0M.,01.10i0il0MMOI001:VOI.010)01 hAtk 0 •,;0 10 0 g 0 0 0 ';':'i;.■;' 0 4.1!'171'.W '4 CD tYltyi MIL00,0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 ,040 0 0 0 0 '0 ,trl' Cliv ai -, .r1 ,-1,-I 'IA ,-1' Fri ...I .,-1 , I ,I ,-1;71,1'rl ..-I -r1 v ,,",, E-4L ;Ito • cri::::, 0 0 0,-! .0 :0 bi-H -1,1 -,i 0 :Cn'In al 0 0 0 01131,0 01 CD tn 0 0 tfl bY,1. , 0 Ca 0111201n 0 0 Ch (410..COM Wip4 1 -1-1 '04 ,.. .r1 0 4 .0 4 . H .0 ' 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0044 0 0 0 0 rts 0 rt120 '0 "rtl , 0 0 rd pi;AT g , 4 ,[;c0. .ri 0 0 (0 C0.r1,14-1 ,..:.,, ..a1,1.., • . ca wroln Lo 4 41 d ro RIA'4.Z4.4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4'4if qiim at „ fg!-,':g-...iy,;s 1,, ,4 ,,i0TA Z 1:..v: 00300033330.0.000000m ..0000000,0 ni tri . • • •,...;:. . . • .7i...,,,, . e O'ji.'',:: 33 . 330 ',30r6d11141111MIII '- •:,,- 3 • • • • :3.3 3 14414 ':..;'Np HD.II'w "W'''''›.'"'.'--.'.' '1:..... ''''''nW-5.656 t;J E t 1:4F o -.,,'::. HHEHH woo ‹oc9HHuouuuououuupuouuu . t,-.'' ., ' . , : t - :,• ' _ 11 , ' .. ;: . ; ., ' i ' , :•- '-'” gR4,. ,scliV,t'A/c'www W6U z;or,'..a s-.rw>.>-na a>,wwwwwwwww.www 0mmw ? ,' h W ' '0 -, ■ ' ' - ' .' ''''', g■ ••■ E,1:,1 L■el-!i,10, '. 0 .,',1 :L . . ' . . ■ - ., . ■r' .,-:=,',;-.,4 ''' '..-1,.':;' 1 .• ';- Y. :i': ,.;:t!...Y.0;fl on P-144ityi,'i .. . ,,, , : ,., .., , ..AVv let; .01 0, --. • ,, - --, ;::::J- :,- ,--,',.:::;:!!,% ...,,-,„„„im ! ,I, ;.,: ,1,..,,A■;, s - 4;:,.. 'aat: :„,,,„4, ,,,,,.,,,, .:-,-,-.,,,-.,:.., • ..,,.::..._,,,:, .;,..,,,,,,... ,,,,,,, =: -:::::',2„. .. _.,. ,.: ,,.,.. OAK; , " .' ',M.'7'' 4,,,, k',1,.4'1!'S., '',':';''': ' . ' '::- . .; : f041Z0404'.-',E''': •T'4 1. ' . ';-. '. '04 ':'! 'I! .,-,!014 ..004495i,', . ''',HE'' - 1' !! )-' ;:,--;.--,::::: r.1w;',6 ,:r,'_'::- .:, 4 ,HH7, Z,..-7C0 0 tO LO 0") -7'.:i :0 ....;:" ::: , :;061 , :' , f: 'f.r :14F*T WW:- E.E AE4V 51',0:Z4i Z00i0 A00 M14 4 4 7. 7., AMM:i0 1 " UU 0Z1-1,7,OLD_OUOLO.P0000000,C.I..OIE.1444V•07.':: *M • ..7:7 PW00-- ZUUOUEU ct',5 565- -- — '''''' CO CO : % 1 ,,l'A , .tV ' .. ' '''1■ 1 ^W14 ‘ , .i C4 X 0 Z '; e. 44.4.EXEEEEZ:X.EZXEZ£Z£, • H tir., 6 ; i4J,mw : 4 ?, r'r- ..:1' wl!-IHk-,, c--) zzzzzzzzzzzz a >>>HHHHHHHHI-11-11-;1HH1-1 x '' 4x >,wwwuwwwwwwwwwwww • ''','" 0xN La c (L4F.E.PE -0 1;1WWWWWWWf 1 101 1 1WWWWWWHh(4,1MPIMMOIMMMAMAMM &N'M '''' - A zH za , . ,. , •.'..'F' E-''''R.'"4"1,s7oi-2i,a,s,g. . - ..11:4' , 4 got ..„,,,,..,,,,, .._:. .. ,:_., 4 4 4,, •. cc . E- (..)■'. - 4:41:4c4 . 1=C . C4PCAPOC40g4;.,.1.,■:.-,,JX 0 450 . ,,,..,..6,4,4,4-i-op,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,),-,,,,,,,,,,,,y.,s0000,!,550.,“4.0w,, ',A0 r:: zw axFnown. ouoz0000uo'ocpopoozb•A 4,44'fliF4E.F.EFE4E-4-11-.E. xmt ,, 0.000 000000 — . ,. --, Wul r.1G14:1trItlf4p zwHw w4aaawaaaaaaa:aaaoaaaaa 4ww :. ,-;, , .-h. , 1 , -4, 0j • 'L'! agt>mgmir_aacKaaapdaixaaaaa- Or•ICIMQ0a11:11:1CCIa0C1 :;1110,JM 0 41X,tP.101:=:111, ,p,=.4,4■ .$4..nzg000wwawwwwwwwwwww mnmr1 1 i:li,41-,c4wwwwxxxxxgxxxxxxww0 i __ , • " - :--- g,;:i RI 'i 7:' .. . • • , „ „.,.... .., , ;'vf;:' .,': ,,1•7.!,:i:4:4 • e.P'q '!' '' • : COHN E., " kW4J6 -.:'.fT Nmmmm ,p m ,0 a0 0014,1■0011-a0v000 ,-:-:x ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,v0,00,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/,001-00,, ,6,16 N.,4# NNNNNNNNNNNNNNOINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN '7 NNNNNNWNN , C4JINN VIAVA , H 7.: -. I i ■ i i I A I i I i 1 j 1 .1 i I i ■ ,i o,.,_ 1 1 I i I 4,1 '4_ I I I i 6■-.A_,;.G4.i i I I I :o.',0,41A 1 I 011ti ?;,-,•,',. 'co ...,'H hr ,W ML0 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOINNWCINNNNN 1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m M m rn m m M 41 m m m m m m m m m rn m m mr 'm m M m m m m M m 'm in m m o,.... 0 riHri'r Wr 00000000000)0000000000000000000000000000000000000 0■1-1'.04 rit-l■-t■-h-r14,11-1,1,1.-il-h-it IttleR4 4 - . ,.,„,_„„ ' t�?:• °:: HHF {N.HF"HHHNw,NN0HHHHHH' HHHHHFsoow1,1,HH'F'Y'rl-'r ,T):1-TI '.5n'2 :52 mmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmomom10 mmmmm ,mOmmmm a. -HM • :'''V HH NH,Hr H.H HH H1-' WH H HHH HHH PHH HH H HHFrHHH H H H HIGH H H H HHH H HH ft':.. 0 go, ( ", W W W W W w W W W W I. W W W W W W W W w W w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W n H ' N ' '" . N N NN NNN NN N NN N N N NN NN NN N NN N N .- NN NN N N NN NN NN N NNN N N N N m,ww Sk N'' i, ; J I _ l 1 7J:7JJJ I tI . II:JJJJJJJJ'.JJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ J,J .IJJJ Y._.•• W If o :: I I W W i I I 1 1 I:;I W W W W W W 'L I r l l 'I' r' I' 1 1 1 1 1 'I I r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r i 1 r' I I I :: H ',� „ � 4 1 W li, W W 1- W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i) k, p ,,r �,p' ! ''' t nMAI/ Il ii P. H aaaaa, a mA4 PI a" a. a4 A00 0oo• 0000ivrultnuiviEntnal�ca .am. : 1 -0' ; `J' F1-440 "', 00' 00WWW NmmmmmmmmmHHH 'HOOONHHHHHHO00000�000 lDWmm =`' :1 JmlfA ! P ' m :101mm JOI UI rP W NH001 VI IP W NNH00101 N't>, W N010 m,J Q�Uf IP W N HrP NF 1''ty:i7 -' rfc t < -' . r r r;' ' � : -0 : -, f i,.tg:!F VI 4 [ 4 *JM� E �1 OM t b - 'y 4 0tg0£:000A M - ICOIH CP0G 1- l y1m0, 01:T um 0 „ t i'r 00'G?10?,.tnOM3OCHNZC ..nb,,,„0 m ,,,,y M Cbn£r? up_ . tldt7 ' `.-,; ,. "' ':;'- "m” M;u4M'7Z. M b 1 HmMm M 1fl O K - o ., - =. :; i; •� i 1; G1G1 7.K t i i [ a 2 U1�c: Gl C. x ' m YM Yr'HM OYAx OMn (M M `L ?7 "L H . J.3H M'MM N I• I . tot qt0, › V'irge) r= MM]'.M £t . -.. M t MMHbC Mz nMH M HHHHHHH h'• II ;N, "'as'='' i 4 r .m r Y -- t' '7n4" u1y tt+l7Y - �',", itt':`t "a i' z. z �'-'+= M£' £ r 'F� M - M bb bb z,;'_ E,td' :: 0dpn OM , 3 •,ZZZZ [14 Ot.. 4•; 4x Cb3 " <rmrrrrt'rr .; ,',' ' ' tl? �'i`k=�'' M R r 'L"R+1?' r r'„" e • tij r O n M -13MH O xx kx 3'.: �:t. ;° y~'m..'�' S' [+I ' H n O z r C M Gk- '[ H R' 1l CHN M. 7 „ fi t : ^ ri �.n ;r O ntI ;; r U 'O H 3 O f70 = 'K K X1H br rbzm bmMSITYY^1CCC „C'C�CC A ti , r ,, ?I r ' 'zro yy?hA1 �1 WC . C ] , 4 fM3 c C�, �HCCUIxx M'C ozE: rbn rOmm.W�m, [I)b7 � ':;e .- q l-itlm ti>4 �kk n mt � 410' H iStl0b K tl Fr. C , -E: ro 1 C W M.H1':u H x� n H : : . r H C H ' + �. 1 t, H H � - [ O H ? 'i -': ?7 ";�,- ?� H M n m tl ,P.,' H H' Ff- H H • :f � �! '' > : H ?7. L. '_ H { V mMm o.s..OrH £ mKK ON {a g 7 p'M C, nnnn.nnn ii',' p�!; r y'1 .,,, ›. K 'Jy , A) ;: z { z � ,� yy �V 1 [H7 �1 H m y n .:,, o u m.. .'C x ' r,',,. M t' ,.. % .: r �1 9 .T, 5p ,ill vf , xG ›. I 4" M �7 .' :Y': 0 , - - .- ltdk -.. M MV "i. r , . 4.,?7 r,)m x H. to ,, I' ,H r ro „.. - , x G';Y i ; krl ! � r x b o ' I W x m i:'! ttfi z m 't` :1!: H N . : r ' x ' � P4 ' Mt ., H "r H,h - G)HQ iiiO'7im ' :,A' H - _ - o. i s ��il r' .;r }I: , - ;‘ M 4 .. M' M M C ;',:) : k ' 3. - 41 - " 1 T ' ;'i, 0 ' + M 0 :•z) O • z' ,J r:ii y:� " .i ! O. C' - - .F,:jW,, M ' r.l ' S M M t J,,, , ;u y �, r tg f, ji'y: Y a ; .N l l' . I t , . , g ; i t : 1 7 f- ,',r} ,-b a5l t 4 i`d 1 r . 1 4;. i < tt n Al y tr JYrrr' z i t - - _ • f inl'' f; :'.:'I; "4•. r: i :, GI : ',., , a z ?t, �' N H M1 ''t ,- K ,r.r, K �Er�.rKrK K ,,JrK,r,.. ii rr ,, K IG *W ' 0. >t . r E o!, H H g HH HH HHH HHH.HI g H'fIO HH . g H H H H H g H H ' H 3 NXNN g H x H HH g H 3 HH CC CCC gg r, GO. 1 'At., r ommt muHu ow'g , H b Y Y�YY C«C< to 4 pa r H , m m CCGG,, � f E „ r l $ ' ,I 1 1 :' I r, M ' "�M MMMMM�C9 n � H 3 . �_ NI , i ' p uz .! waa m.00Ma aaa,a,wwwwaw• ,, b z: ✓1 �, a } i ,, N NN N:N' NNNN` NN.NNNN NYNN a U II n 11 b N N N , ba NfONaNI0N0a p a , , " 5111 } R 'I 4 W W 0 p Y o...o, I r • 0 M £ ol Y =. o. M Y � Y W F e{ . 0 7 N d 5:5:5: � o v o H o- 0 0 - - o - W W W Y Y• W Y w [ w. w a1 a. a w !i:;,'. tr 21 } t�1 W 1 . `0 0 : 5 5 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 O:. d'5:� N. 5: 0 5' 5: 0 0 0 N N N N' N:N N k'.,, '. :''m r , g !t ., W W;IQ EO:tOt0 1O t0 m tQ.W.W.W:W tO tO t; W.W.,EQ.W 1Q tO 1Q EQ 0 10,IQ.A11, 0 AQ 1Q IQ 1Q 1Q �Q 1Q 1Q 1Q o ' 7' 7' �, 'a".Y 7' W rt0 rt,Mrt rt 0 7'ft 0 0rt rt0I rt'rtlIrt0rt0 0 0 0 11 rtrtrt 0:flmrtrtrt H- W,H - H• N 1.7 ;,,, ! 'I , �'� 7 0 0' of p'o o 0 0 o o- al o.7 o o a p.p: p,; o: o o o o a : p p = p w o o o p, 0 0:0 0 0 tQ w w•w,W,w w ` A =!0 i R i 1,xs 'f i. -:' �A_ : ... ., y t 0 0 0 0 ' 0 rt - , m m ' th olgplomW a mocd ' o mmmin wwm om m wm m mb m m m. mo m 00.0- 00,0 0 t,, r mmmm mm' mm ' m0m mmmmm - m wm mr 0!0 b Nm,N oom ,PI0 o l0 o 10 000 'all0 oo Jwm ko ^ r , j,{ j }. 00o:6 O O 'O O O O m �P O o : o, 0 0 0 0 0 - AP O O O rP 0 0 0 O, OI O' O O O lO 1p tp l 0 l0 10 1 0 v,..,,,; tJ mmmNINmmmlO �mmmm mmH,t,, mmmm mmm NmmNm W mmmm mmm,mm• ,, � �i'1 '1 i r l ei 1; 51: m r I fil f !” I ir. 1 , I ` { , „1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 t t � a{ w" N W{( W 0 1 -4('''''', w �`) W W W W W ' W H : W 01 1 1 m p sn m a, . t l t 0013 {' to , O O 3w o .1.� w i l y lW o W 1 1 A W m li i tomrdmo `m rala z { a l t Li„ 1 O --- W I I)O H T W-lW_ WH WN H NH O '.O G 11 , t 'i 2 tSq g miE , m I ]N off 4N' N r AN NN; { . N,P f A r � r }§ r 1 f f ;E:A 11 � rl "�!Y t`E�X ! 1 1 N WI { fir y F £'' 1 t , r e { I p 1o� t�, CI , „ ; t . !, { r lll�'�If al �r'',t t !F' t11�v1 I p ?tr t' tr rfrE s�r' ' ., t f` Ik t4 ;� 5,,,: fi{ �1�r v r rf 1 I i `� ' 4 $ r`, :F ,,, : r y 0 14 1 t' Ft ttii � i t Y l r . [ , ,+% ' 6 _ 1�1 t z1 r , { 7 � 'f „ t, ,,..4 x , ,,. ' I r q : i ! .,. 5 rT,. it '$:0.:-'41''.= t r, , Fa: ? ?'' 4 i :.4V.: , 73'1 '{,1 U ..0, 't. ,�djl w'; sr. .>• &, ', 3!'i ... ;5 - ,,,.,: ,f ":- rtr ., Wow Ffr: ,,, *ya 'i.�y ,,:,7s' i ,I.,! : - - 1 1' t ' '���1s;tt1,: s,j �” i: ? , ;; k:,.:,:; � • ' ,; . L�.: r ,. f1 _ , >i. r i. . n,,, t, , w ' 'L{si ti, ,, ' r7;,u,., i t ' ;_ ��1 p',r,'�;r { Y I't, -'i.• 1P OW '4rr�t;� , . r .� . „ .•. r�.p it {i;`r YS::e; ' ' M t • li i t It h Y ' 1 F f1� i f '9, �`�,i'�r'R i( y'S�' f, 4: �'.` A y r N 1 O tt I , , i m r � } 1, "� i ' 4 " Pill "'�."1C; � Pi-50:$ ` '{: 1 r: I : } � t.,...y :d!' , a i 1 1 s ;VI f ,;r 1 �t 1 1 + ' , , E �1� s { 1s i, 4 A •I #6 N" 1. r l i� IA ' i: , y t ' 1 I ” 4, , t r , p � v� t o 7 " GMT 3f'r1 I Y ' [ 7 ' Ec nary` I $,, k * t y �,E M . i fx 't'3 t >♦ r - ., , 0 t` T n y,. . r te4E 41 , HjiAf L? I rJ ` - y � r! ji, 1 7 K3 r„ t , -t -t-A,-.1. 61 f}� 4 ' � ' , . ,, 1` iiJ'r f, !'. S',I,", :; tr ' ,: j ' � r a , "• :,� ' � �� s.,IrJ. w_ ;h- .li r r' s� i..� ; '�i�i {., �'� ,:A• i k,i ' t" ` t C .li • t t + ';lf;;1; `i i:;,l ;'�'F �_ 1.ii;': Vii,, li ';��'t) j; ,5'45.167, ±`ti' - , i 'i ili " ,;. p; +.! }" ' "• � T• ;O AP ^- rl ilr l 440 '°t �; ; i' 1 - S 4r '+' li rr y9 �, ; A ,,, T A i k' � 1 f ti , zx r J r G sy U - i ! ;%' l;*- � . { oit�� ,, a,2,z'` t „ '4 �` �;' ie l4 p 1 �} f r i' .: . : 0 tt .�n �rt ' 4 u '� p. s II ; r { 1 ,,,, S7"111 6r'i >: 3 11 1 PIS I# 0 -:r ilt y l.u,,,, G • 1 5:.;.1, -;: - Z : •' 1 „.-.,, , ,..i-,,,, . .,.. E ,,..•. ... PHPHHHHHHH WC-, W ;' -'' i,' „.-.1...,-; .,,,,i",-;!.•,,,,4■':', ;:,',"iitl'i,',..."..',"' 4,4-, .,,,,,--, .- ,- .-.,- , .. ,.. .-:-., '',:.:':,:;,1,,; ,,,, ,, 9.: 17l 1 _ E ,' ':';';','HH1-.1- 1 1 - .4....• O. .: „,. ,...,. ,. 1,4•1fr•••■,'.', ' i41.':.•;.V :'-''''• ! , 1 , '`'.`1" ! '' •''.'' .'-1.., W W Wt.. (..) w L•J lo W (/'..r. NJ 1-• , i:• - '.0.2:4 - , , 4'..',..4 -.-,,-''0•• .. ,,, t.) IQ tJ N IJ 10 t..7 IQ tO M -q1 :1,,,,,,, .;, gi... , -i ” ^ -4 ----3 ..) . ,J -4 -4 -4 .../ --.1 /-" • ,•,,;••:i..) •‘..„E•,•, .., .1.,.•;;:„.t -,,,t 44.40:;;.: F,-,,,,I,,,, ;: ,,,..,..;,..,,,,, •:•-'„' •!'1;: ;,,..!,..,.........., t., L., ,....,.."......, i ,, •,,J,, ' -•,,,;,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,;•• ;- cw, 1;1, NJ NJ N) tO to iv NJ NJ NJ NJ ,:, ,07,,,ife-;frA. ', - -: -1 . ' , : - ; , ' . 4''', 7 ' . : .„ - ..,, ',:, H, 4' 4 4 4 4 A ,,,,,,,',, 0 .•,• , ni.OF. '• • • ■!.' . .-Y• Yit:i':• ; - : ; . , , ,, ,.,- ,, ...-.,, , ,L. : „,,.•,• '.1.'.'s.•'■''-';'' „, .'- 1;;:'.''.;' 'zk', lo .1 4 1.4 tO I-. ••.•'r,:;'..., 0 •' i •, ) ji' V r .•;',- .I.J'ij;.'''''',!•:!•',':'• ' ti,1:i.:.:•'• . ... ,, .• 1•;-'1i ',;'. .:.',,', •,e .., . , .. •-„,?.1,,, r. - -. -. . '''.'S.'_';...I:1 ,,,!:.',' e f' ,,,,,,(,,,,.,,,,,,: .„,, I f ; •. 1 , ;c; ;..: :•,,k,,, f4, , ".” .- ;;;„„•,.•-,,i •!..-.:4;:i.i:i:;_,, ,,,,,•;•-•;:;;;; ; . • ,. ;•,,, ' ;1:•• , •31',J '■' •;;•;•„; •••,,,,;,,I,,,, ,..,...„.• ,i-11' •., . " .., ., l'S ''''''''''?,.':. ',.117'4''■. ,.,,..._ ._ - , ._ ...1' ,t '?,';' ,..:, ',.7.7 -.','%. ,' . ..;',1 , V.,. ■.4 t tq XI ,r..1. 0, 0 gl rir,':„.; ,, u u o 0 Pz1 P I ,,, ,.:;,t, Ingi,q1 :':!I ; ,'A 4 le. :: : ri„j", ::, N t OZ 1 ad n -.iv,. „., ... ll i0 ''.:1 V .:;' . . ,. ,.., ,...,,, ,. - ',6 ,, , H 0 ■-1 tl . , , ,...0 - iK '"0 t co x 1 t. t2 017P 0. 7,t, •, , "!,,,',,;--': - .,`4: st - " ,, ' , ,I.", 9 ;9 p t. 11 0 0 Z ' - .3 tr1 ti..., 4 ' , ...,'. 1 - ,';'. H 0 --' $•C , A , t'' "''• ;.,:'',. i',"' ■4('J• `. ',.'j • "!.,,,,. • ,,.,... ',.''..P.1 0', Iii Z 91 9' S ..“ Z "= if.'", A . ...,:.,',,' ' ;, ' ,', ,.. r 'in, .;:p t.,;, tn Z 1 1.:1.1,',.'"';;''%1 . ... , :, ,..,.,:,11- .1 ;.0"..r...... :,, ''„''.:,-- •!1 W 4 • " :, '..., W j. g S , .',.',It••••:.••.; '''''.:',',•_,1.,•:',1• ,....'..-....:‘,,i.! ,.: 0 at g. X td t' 0 . : , ,,,:„.,: .0 :01'4 v, ,.. ;..t . ,i I ,r.' 0':' ti„.,„;",- 5, yo . ,.. ':, ,, 4): ."..,, - ..,.,;;,' cn DI d„, II 't ',, 1:1 1 : ,,,,.±.., i3,1,kp.1' 1E ,-,..,,,,,,,,;:....v, :,„ c .,. - . ".,"'. , '4 ',:.s cn ,„ H 0 W W W r .,,,,,,,,L,., ,,„ , , ..,,,,„,,,., :, ,,,,„ H t.,, L - .,.,,,,,,,,,z HXt1.1t:d): .2:10 , t'T - .4' -„, .,,,, :-:hig. : ,,',,%:_i,: ,,,' 7,"" '',: ..,:: 4 '':'.,,; .:'CI,_, g I pj"p r i i : g . : P ;; ... ,,, „,,,,,,,,,,, 1 4 ,„ ,,, . ;!'.- : 9 ,. Z V i'.5 - -..''.' H .',' ; .. -,, -I' 3i ,' '.)‘• -V- h:', :"A,',:.,,,,ir,, ', ' ,1:', .1 ' .: 1 , : ',:; ', !; ' , n Z , '1 1 ';1 1' 41 cn ''''' ' '`, ,. rq -s.••;:;;•,..,,,,..„, ;').••:,••• ;iv: . . , i;•'• ; • .-3 i ;,,,,,•• -,, : ...•••;,, ,-;',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '::::•1. :.,,-, ...i.,,, in 2,..•-:.::,•,,, tl :'• i1•101 c-1 ..:4"'", z 6) 1,1. .',,c„...,::: ;',V., l...'.'.1' ,, 9! ,... - ,'"1,'..';'2: ' • ', "--.:.., ! 0 . .. :'' - . '4::.'..'„Ityi 4 .it0 ., ‘ i ' T':! C k1 ' =1;i i'„'-'i'''.:,A; i:.. ',. ;,.„' ! . . , ..'f'' , .. ' , H 1.1'ig'''ilir.-• :R '''''':.. . ''?. . 'pA -:; „ ,. 0ip...g.,:i.:,,. ,,...-44,2,,z, i',”:,i7:::',"- '" , 1 .'.1: -.4 P'.; ' qt i.; ...,t 1., f :■9",,.'..r.,.!,', ,. ;.;.?' ., , ...,.„., ).,..r,:.',Y•,, - ',',.,. ' ''J i ; `,),'. ';''.11',,,-' ....... _ 'CA.:■.; ';' :';1':' '''..,:'' -„,; ".1q; '1 T'. gc4c.' ,,,, ,,,, , •„•,• 1 ;,.....•.,;•;,,,,,;;;;:: .., . r __ .. -._. ' :5 (,):2...,;1:: 7 ' 4 - .1 , ' ,.. •' tri • t r .., ‘. • -1,k , - .1":,,,:',Zitl,,,,,li ' ,0,',.,10,.0 „ . , , 'i't - 1.:•, I-. ' .,, ,„, , - ,, '.. qft ik 3., +.1 lid 1 - ';),,,,..: 1;', .:T i 7 ''...!3 tr,...,r,s c ,.• ,i „; .,. . *.11"Pv.tt •:i., ,,,.i',.,0ii,,,,v .i,q.5. . .- . ., --, ii : ,,,-.,.•,,,,,,-., - 1' ',V it vti q,„ . . . ?; , ..','A !-,,--; ..' ' .;' ,-e ..< rn ■-C ..< , 0 ■0 cr) ■-< ■.< , pi ii11 :-.-, :::. - 4 ..,.c. -i: 1 i;: 2 1 : . i1t rq t'l 71 X X t'l X i ii ; ' A 0 "' . ' .--',4, - .81=: , , "5'.: ;' ..'. -"i- 3", :::, ■<..,:q,.%i 1-1 I-I H H 1--I . .3• H I-1 01'- - '.7,,,-42,.t ;,`:1 , ,, 5 .;11'' , i.-:4 - _,. - -i .-' ,aic,,' Ai. .,'•1 _ P.V '.- ','''' ......,;-4.,i,i'. 4; ',,,:,:',., '',..; ,v• , „, „tt ; 4. ,. ,. .- _ , il . 1'id74: • - 7:i' -.1, ,i II,- - 0:11-- q. . III- - i4,,,__ .,,, A. • „ ., . _ . ..t , - , .., . . _., , . , , , . : -,.'` £ £ P Z'' 2= £ £ ' 0, -- ,. ■ .„. „, -, ... .. - 4, ... ,,,, ..... -;411. ,•.-<.:,,. 51,-55-5"),F,..:4:-3, „.... -, - , 5 4'. £ , ;;:..., , ,4,-,■,',; W I B f A 0. PP, Sb, Oki 0. ' 1,1 -' 11l " ,,,J, x:4,, ...,,.„. .., --,,;',,,,, r. ,, i''' . : tn 0'0 0•0 13) 11,,;',.• •.. ViV,l'a!,.';'..' ,-+;.,.:, • .. .."4:.: .:".. .iil, O' a' 1 a" a' ai o'. 0); a' a' a. tl' 1 - : - ,..1,', 1, 1 - i:',„...',„ = ii,.. .,.....we.1,1t. P. 1-.• 0 I h• P7 } P H• H.. 11, Vq. '-'•14PQVIT•i .... .- . '•"''N 0 0 Cr1 0 W ?I''' 0 0 n'' 'k'''!Cn s, (.;:,. .71.4.V „ . „, ..v‹ , t-11tOr.. 7” ., .I., IF.i..'A:';g.L' --],. 0 0.0 rt 0 0'1,, S 1 ,.:,•!'' 1 1, , q , ',7, Vo:- . , grt 0 0 rt rt '''••, 91 , ; ; . ... .— ,., '"; , ; I: -- ,.,..,.,, 3. • - 0 0 0 0 0:0 0.0. 0 0 , ,,, sit rk.;_,; ,,,, I . , 1 :•::.., r„ A., o 0 0 0! 0 0;0)0 0 -...., .„. . 4-,• -,- ,,,,,,,, . ;:-....% 4••-•,..;••• 0'. 0 w.,..,-,,,,:•,..,, if,...ii w co , ,9 . U5: 6 4; r l0 co i a45,7U.'j 42,;:ii--V,-, ;' , * ,":-; 'l ,to ■0o) g) 11 .: ' '',11 '''il?.T4 LO Yr Y1. 01 'D W 1a,'*1,11 1,.CfP:ii‘4.4 °"%) Vc?,:gt %?0 Rii•PIVi" 11•••••••tsgog -.•••.ti gi•ii:,• -:•:,•,-„,•::. ,-- 4' , .. - ti :Fr i; 0 co , ... ',4141 , 44 `H>.. , . .. ,,,, 1' 'ill W W ' =.■11••. ' •'.1" ,. % , . , ,ri %. ,...A. ._., , ,.. sq ?.' 4 rl'''i'Z,1,7,-' --PI:' • .Y..r.f,)tp.',..1; ;,..' Fij'fr.1 9r, -o 1i h'., :.041li .....A■1.1,.p. :,;,,-' 1.,,,,,,,,", . , ■1' ' l ; W 1-' . 1V ' i 1;i:-'11 tl'h1.5.'i : ,, 1_ . ' 040. ,,,, , a , ,f,', ....; 4,1% :11' ,;1.;;,{, .. 44 C '5, F.,4 W ,;;,.?,"--, ,,, 0:.--',,Stl!,!1 '-`t '"■1 1 ,,, V 5' '-' : : ( - 41 i.: ,- : 0 -1 i k r :'' ,,,,,,,,,,-,, ,, ,,,,,,,,.„ ,,,,.-4,,,,-..f.; ',7 9.4 r , • ' .,,,,,,,■;;;10.• ,..,.1•.1..,.:'•,,,,P 1,. 1,,g ',,.,,,, 1:AUIC•rti, 1:q ";., -• il•-)1i4.it:;•••., ,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,, - !,.lig ,::::. v v,, 5,,,:: ti , ..., , •, -- •■•.''.'1:: , -• iP,---. ••-,, ,, r-..11; 44 "'<, '. :1101.1.,, 11..'1;',-.•1,-,11.•:e v-,,,,,,, :■,' Ai 1:, , P" . ., 5 , '" ' ' ' ''' g ''P■ ''',' . 4 -44 4 ' , , , ei t;,, .6. 5,..1 ..1 0 . , 0 ,•, T i3 .•! [I, P.1,,V51k;', i,■ s., -.. , • ,, „ , PI ,jr.EIP ■; ,..64 1,•::: . +- t. a,,,,... 4=i. 91: ,.;1■-..`f; ,...„-.v..,*.„ ,,,... ,...... ....„ „. ,,,, 'eltikl..f, h'xi, ,,' "ii ,t,t , X. 1 4 , , , 11. 1 :41;p, i i 141,,ki-I ''Att,,,9 -.';"''',,,tiM'...j" tv-41..',.-,, :IAA ',,',,,, ,0, ,, ,•-ivz.,. , C.:'i' , i; ,' i .' ...' ',.i ..-1 0 . 3,,, 4, V , ,:t ',-=,:41 k `: ir t0 ,, ;4; ;.--,1 ;,;,!' ';j:' . „..,. '.'. ..,,,r9,,,-f, Vil`-t .,,.'',1,,, ,,;, .' 2:..1 0 'F• 4, - - ''''', A ,14,,,i,,,,,,, ,- I, . ''. ' '''' l ' 1 ,,?,,,', - s> , ' , 1 1 "1- 1 'lq 1"61tu?;1!Ziii 41]..411i-lk; ,,,,i.•.,0:,,-;,,, 5 ! 'S Itq ,,r'j ei? ; - :1',;:i '.=,OV i,;, A, ',', ,..); '...9 7 i , ,-, ,, g ,- EI,•:, ., ?..1'.?... 1 1.,‘,:, s,1 Vc , 'ti'll , , , ',., '; .;:3 -!j'k''';,'"%,..:', •, - 1 , ;! ;;. , ."..i V 9'. 71!..Z."&r: 'I,VitT,:;I: 4,Kt ,J'ir.r. 31 -, •.,',,,.,[. 4, i,p, ?.0. 4 ."'-'-'ta.. +, •1 . 1 tj' qi,,,,,,i: ,,;1&•,•„•,,,,-11 f' .'d -- ,!t4- , qrd11 -,,,,,,,.-,,, :,,-111T..4:J, --,,,,,,1,-,,;...,- if Vr.' t V.M;., ■ . W ,,-40,, : i V :A1 Y :-,,: a0:11.-:j ii,IP..,,,,,,' , ,V4 ' ,:. '',' ,4.1.',,,',!,.,•-f• f/,,,' . d . :0 ` '.. :t. C.'r..q:,... ' . P Y1,,; tl:P.1'kit-':,':',,, :11.4 'i a .1?i 0 : l'': ' ..i ' " '''t .,'/.i Xf1,A •■••+ 1 ,':,' d iii:p': .'.... . it, P' -, ii■ , ,..,ir,r,,i- , 4- .."-v. 11'; "1" .., „,.. ,, - 4 ii i .;:.•.-:: Iii'llVj'i'''': ... •f: 01 ,':,?111,'1!1 4,i '1. W. ,,.,,,. .0 ,-.• ,,., 4 t,' ' i,■ ' ',1 1 11k , . .., .,,. Army Corps Dept of Natural Resources P.O. Box C -3755 713 Bowers Rd Mr. Greg Griffith Seattle, WA 98124 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 • Olympia, WA 98504 Sheila Ross Mr. Paul Donahue Cascade Natural Gas Dept of Soc/Health Service WA State Attorney Gen. Office 401 N 1st St. Capital Programs Ofc. Bldg#2, 120 S 3rd St #100 Yakima, WA 98901 MS OB -23B Yakima, WA 98101 Olympia, WA 98504 Chamber of Commerce 10 N 9th St. Dept. of Health Mr. Richard Smith Yakima, WA 98901 Michelle Vazquez Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 1500 W. 4 Ave. St. 305 314 N 2nd St Spokane, WA 99204 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Paul Burlingame City of Union Gap Dept of Transportation Ms. Millie Will PO Box 3008 2809 Rudkin Road U.S. West Union Gap, WA 98903 Union Gap, WA 98903 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 /res Ornelas — �\ Clean Air Authority Environmental Protection Agency Yakima Co. Commissioners q s , :nd St., Room 1016 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Room 416 Courthouse ama, WA 98901 Seattle, WA 98101 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly Dept. of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adm Bldg. FAA Yakima Co Health Dist Mail Stop AX -41 2200 W Washington Art McKuen Olympia, WA 98504 Yakima, WA 98903 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 1 Debbie Smith — Dept of Ecology '\ Interagency Committee Mr. Richard Anderwald 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Outdoor Recreation Yakima Co Planning Yakima, WA 98902 P.O. Box 40917 128 N 2nd St. Olympia, WA 98504 -0917 Yakima, WA 98901 -r 7 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section Nob Hill Water Co Mr. Vern Redifer PO Box 47703 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima Co Pub. Works Olympia, WA 98504 -7703 Yakima, WA 98908 128 N 2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Dept of Emergency Services 4220 E Martin Way Pacific Power Yakima Greenway Foundation Olympia, WA 98504 Ricky L. Walker 111 So. 18'" St. 1101 N. 16th Ave. Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Filed 1701 So. 24 Ave. Planning & Co Affairs enc r. Caroll !' almer Yakima, WA 98902 9th & Columbia Idg. near Examine ama Inoian Nation MS GH -551 ,3 , r � 'O Box 15 Olympia, WA 9, Sf +H 0, Date - ° +` , A 98948 File - 243-62, EC0II-62 Mr. Hiram Olney YMATS Planner Yakama Indian Nation YVCOG P.O. Box 151 6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Beckley Mr. Doug Mayo Yakama Indian Nation Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Federal Aviation Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner PO Box 632 Seattle Airports District Office Toppenish, WA 98948 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055 -4056 Mr. Marty Miller Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Office of Farmworker Housing Yakama Tribal Council 1400 Summitview #203 PO Box 151 Yakima, WA 98902 Toppenish, WA 98948 Watershed Information Center Bureau of Reclamation Brenda McMurray PO Box 1749 402 E. Yakima Ave. Suite 534 Yakima, WA 98907 Yakima, WA 98901 Martin Humphries Soil Conservation Dist Yakima Valley Museum Atm: Ray Wondercheck 2105 Tieton Dr. 1606 Perry St Suite F Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98902 Perry Harvester ALWAYS SEND TO Dept. of Fisheries APPLICANT 1701 So. 24 Ave. Yakima, Wa 98902 Mr. Scott Nicolai Yakama Indian Nation- Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 ,�.,� ''L DEPARTMEN iF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DL OPMENT trT .∎' Planning Division . v I;., 129 North. Second Street ,,,9 • ,'" Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575 -6183 ® Fax (509) 575 -6105 NOTICE OF APPLICATION & HEARING DATE: July 5, 2002 TO: Applicant, Adjoining Property Owners, and SEPA Reviewing Agencies FROM: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes and Planning Divisions SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 NOTICE OF APPLICATION The City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic Development has received three related land use applications from Skyland Company, Inc. The first application requests the rezone of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi - Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. The second application requests Class (2) land use review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket located within the SCC zoning district and the final application concerns environmental review, a Washington State requirement for any property being considered for rezoning. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is to notify all public and private agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise that the City of Yakima Division of Environmental Planning has been established as the lead agency, pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the above stated project: Primarily because of traffic issues, the City of Yakima is presently inclined towards the issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (MDNS) on this project. REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS Your views on the proposal are welcome. All written comments received by July 25, 2002 will be considered prior to issuing the final recommendation on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, Washington 98901. Filed Hearing Examiner Yakima EXH ,D'a' . Debi " 5-- °)---- . -.. M CttY File #. g2-10 -62- 6 c70 - r � r I a, 1994 Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This rezone request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, August 22, 2002, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509) 575- 6042.or e-mail at bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us. Other Permits Required: City building permits Encl.: Narrative, Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Environmental Checklist - SEPA reviewing agencies only. . —.....0 J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS MAY 2 2 ?002 Regional Office fl OF YAKIMA 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 PLANNING DIV. Kennewick, WA 99336 509-783-2144 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Fax: 509-736-0790 TO: Bruce Benson DATE: May 21, 2002 1 PROJECT NO 20223 City Of Yakima PROJECT NAME: Winco Foods 129 N. Second Street RE: Signed SEPA documents Yakima, WA 98901 , WE ARE SENDING YCIJ as checked below: x JS Mall 0 Ove!night 0 Courier 1 L ...'''''s..........._.L.. 7--- DATED DESCRIPTION L._ ....... _ I 12 1 7/1 , 02 Preliminary Site Plan '; --------------- — 5,'13/: SEPA Checklist ! 1 _I 1 ...... ....... _ ._ ..___L_..„ _______,....... THESF P--;:, . 1W,r):.;El) , v , , checked below: A For apprevit' El For signature El Resubmit _ _ code:, ft! . i., D Fir Irtcrrriatio: , _r;r: 0 Make changes noted El Submit _ c fci ■.!lt,tribui icy) 0 A: requested Ej Revise and resubmit Li Rett ___ corwred nrints 0 Fo or retievy ana c.omirient 0 Prints eturd after can to us C , REMARKS: 0 ■ SIGNED: t(-! , ; .i Paul Anderson, Design Technician Hearing Ergarnkiet ? c: File g P24 3- (sz I E cAlltz --- If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Illii% ‘" , — REQUIRED ATTACKM I , f : t ° Y, ` ,� ��' n ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST /v ED r "' `' { STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) i Y 2 0 ',$ ;i .F a . • / 2002, i (AS TAKEN FROM WAC 197 -11 -960) ;, ° � l'1. Q . CHAPTER 6.88, YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE (YMC) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2 IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS , . This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE; OF. CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS - ,.' :'.;` : ;,;,,;,'. , <`,;: , Complete this checklist for non - project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non - project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND,INFORMATION:(To be completed b thie a hcant:)..: ; ', Y., PP � - 1. NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (if applicable) 7 R t 0 0 0 s, F, 5 UP5 L,,,fr-, Ave.f‹ e1 2. APPLICANT'S NAME & PHONE S Y (,4 D Go ,"il N y SIG. ( 5 - 6)3 ) 7�0 6 4 /6 7, 3. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS p Q 13 OX' ` 00 / W oo0/3 Ut N t 2/z 9 7d 7 / 4. CONTACT PERSON & PHONE J Ont 1 (-M-AJ 0 L iz - v Err (5O3) q 1 et) - 4 5. AGENCY REQUESTING CHECKLIST Ci 1 'T y of YA K l rvl t,4 6. DATE THE CHECKLIST WAS PREPARED MAy 15 Z 00 _ 7. PROPOSED TIMING OR SC IDS ULE (includin Ising, if applicable jt: J, C-Ow)Pt TEO M', y Hearing xamin x iv,- ZZ 6Z.- 1 /zoo � �evised 10 -98 ,, Se A , „„ - 'f'� page 1 of 10 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS (Attach if Lengthy) 1. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. YES . O cir F e c 6 c-- P/4 D /91- 116 r „/ . /✓0/3 ill 4-4. /3 [... V P. E0 R .' T-'- 5 C'"— ,pc v6 1 tJ7 % fr 6 /5. /i"G Sri /' /17D3 5. r. PvTvi�2e" 5x / o A-- ,c? # c::),./ 7/t �`ST � ! /' O t= Tr e ,o, Pas - 5.0 5 vP5 .e .9,a c E T 2. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ir5 6E5 To 5 I 12-C" 0/ti - effs /J /779- /A/7 5 5 U J e Pc' f- 1 /3 Y i� UGGlzvt� 5N/ Ga » s ON 0 /o 7/ . ,P 27 9,V f9 5-5 E5 pt._ / evC c.te i 6ti p Ie E PA t-� D FL) G-CiP�1."t E v . CON G-T /!V ( J, OA c2/ /2 7 /OZ 3. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. c- P c b ? Pe... ✓ '`+ e 1 G rt wL t h e sn r 4. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • c J T y o F• Yref ' # 131111-0 F'c)a r- c 1 • /t) P I 2 E 5 S - T O F - - r n t ,- ? E i T c ' S T . UC T / L k ) 5 / 7 - 5 . 5 • 12— 2-oN E . 64,/g Z-- Ge3-U e gz,,5'"lc -y 5. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) y rt't C% P C7J G G� �Q/1l✓- 1 5 T5 6/• 7 57 C— �' 0 / ". Trf� 5 ,{" 9 7%/v ce, re9 14 A TEL - 79 do© S, F, Tc2 TAG- 5171 /5 /2,8 A`c 6. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. j /-1 1 v l C D A/ D/2 -7 . A f- t' /c L /34 -10 /70,) F 5 / T o 2,iis - , 7 - T v T N'S U/ froJD W "Jd /z3 ft /�G , up T7 J ,/7 Scv7- .4, page 2 of 10 B. ENVIRONMENTAL E (To be coriili the,'applicannt) Space Reserved for 1. Earth Agency Comments a. General description of the site ( one): _ 1 . flat 7 rolling n hilly I I steep slopes _ mountainous other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Z °1 p c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. iZA Vet-7 614AJL s /LT d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ,J0 le-NoLAIN e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Tit t E ` r r5 k1 / i- /; t ep g4 0 6 2 7'o A cc o r.-7 rt . 7t ooc 5, G: J3vrc.� i 'may , AP? 2o>ctNtfr7':ct —Y 30,00,-3 G > LA/ r /3E , j v' D f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use'? If so, generally describe. ■v 0R051 0/'-i / . ,4- rV7'/G- /GATE0 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? eo ox h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: POST" G0,evT 'JfG.L SE /thec, a r►l AJrc17 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. lV oar LL aI.) A n1 - rirl '6 /O ' F ore5F�_ far Al e y, 5T ,r AY f� A i� rze�t3C -Gw� 7.j jNlGj GOAI167 rIo,J b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /V c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 17 5T #4 , -45 L)tL/- 15E 1 jC?Ef T1-4 E /, f' P L- t GA-T t O rU page 3 of 10 Space Reserved for 3. Water Agency Comments a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. AJI�NC t4.NOv Ai 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Nc) 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or re moved from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N 4 . ) 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Na b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 51 rZ v`1 w AT e E^/ ITj E O c rA r Al eD or1 5 /Ti- THEW D15G►�/�� 4,c:'D /PTO ST >t-,& 561 , ON S iT-E /NF / ri u5t7 g6 t)5E"D 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. y'JO vdATEIZ w,(-r. 13e DET'AING O/\J ITE 7 e ' 015t H - A 1 . i rr 5 rage, 5E aNSrrG writ _ r /zAT tv∎A Y A C 50 g E U5c'D, page 4 of 10 2. Could waste materials ei,_ ground or surface waters? If so, generally . .scribe. Space Reserved for � 1 L " C7 , i 7 r fa- O V p A 2 k. t ,P C, L '1 $ w X Agency Comments EN re/Z- rrF 57 were" - c_dLC- T oN 5 > d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 51 prTE ,Jrtcm t ✓ND "-"O 5T0214 T AN1 A J P /02 LPe PoNp, ALSO G/ I ?r4slA. Tv N A ✓E sepj /ys EN?" NKS, 4. Plants: a. Check (A) types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: U alder n maple [ aspen ! other LvGVST /epPLAe evergreen green: n fir El cedar [ pine _ other n shrubs grass n pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: n cattail n buttercup ❑ bullrush n skunk cabbage n other water plants: ❑ water lily ❑ eelgrass ❑ milfoil ❑ other other types of vegetation: V e t O 5 WEED$ b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 6 5 r AN/ ✓EC, BrATio") onJ - S ire i5 fiiiA1 /rr. A-No GD�✓5 STrj yvt,q.11VL y pgYG,4N0 4 2�55E5 EP5 ALL yE4�67 r T10n1 TO 6E izE'aV D c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nc k nJv(..rA/, d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: _ Tk I✓ C-0 ti" t7 5'7 w✓IVL 13E L frt 5 PEJ / N �L GGolz l7 ft AJGE V✓ITN G ITY OF YA L Iy1n14 RF.ILut cr1'". � , 5. Anim al ANt7yG,4PIrv 6 7 vvj 60 N, oF- L-I ' /', 1}JZ��rj E5 a. Check ( any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: 1) birds: ❑ hawk ❑ heron ❑ eagle igr songbirds n other 2) mammals: [ deer n bear n elk n beaver ❑ other 3) fish: ❑ bass ❑ salmon n trout n herring [ shellfish ❑ other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. "10 , \ J L : , ' J O Y - ) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Nor) - ,o v.1,1 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: /\JoNE page5of10 6. Energy and Natural Resources Space Reserved for Agency Comments a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. e. L /�L� I/SC r °�Z E E LT CL I G"t Y A A./1) r> T V T L C� A5 w 1 I IZ C-oNDIT -/ 1.7"1016! t .�c'ATI►vC�, jLEFztC TI O% 1 / I..I C. 1 rI rJ 7 L TG. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. it/o, c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: F - I EAT 2 E« iv/ nn OFF fl 26F'21 (7E0pc - ri EQ Pw�CN1` 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO, 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. AI oNE 1.E, NO 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: t./ONE b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? TRA F rG haDI5E5X't5 1 G ?CNci A- / ", 1 --r t 5 ku o r 5/c Tx) fir? PA-Gr rHE P27S6c• 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. oov5r(t•- ✓oT10^/ N9/SE tni of e oaJ A 5 �d - - 1 j 13•0+- 5 o o /,2 R•,4Gi, Y (3ETW EE.v T H E I o � eS r. 3. Propose measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: "Wu E 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? DIZ t U67- IN 1 PIT A-AJD !z Est DENn Pr I-- A- PA-121 - 67"1" c- o E>e". b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. YE Phe-0OrvAIto A/^ITLY PizIOPTo 1 qSa, c. Describe any structures on the site. CiO& - E 5 3 Ic2" 9uILDI NC 14 C 03 ,fA: 1 EI` futu d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? /C5 , A L. . t"Ki Vri t 4' STrzu vacs 1a 13 (LEf\ ovEP e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? S " ' ' ' g-3, Page 6of10 f. What is the current comppreh. _live plan desi nation of the site? Space Reserved for E 6,0-4 P co " yvN E 2 G t L Agency Comments g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so specify. PI i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ZOca j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 1Zo k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any /•.loNE" 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N GL Gd PST) f3L�- � I T N S 1-re p t t� Ai ri PA 2G Ec. 5 a EVE & fez C7 o. AJC, `1 2 Lt, C.. (77,V E a A L. ; L- A ry qt 14- w► EN P Y L P TO /✓ � i �9 H r Ram 9. Housing Go►+. ZGIAL a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 44 - S A/c orv , A PASZT rvIEA v c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NDNG, 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structures, not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials proposed? T r 1 -L-LET C= 15 A 24 -0 H ro/4 ErcTE(z tort LAI 6E Grytu./ &J P3 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? J4JDN6 �� n/ o�.✓N, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: - �t - kE FtZir i PA (il i..p(N4 Eire etoo t j3E iN g G oolzoiNAT'ED ✓J►TN TFtE c- IT pF yI1 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ow. p ErrD P1ZOY6c n t-✓1 L(- N tie LI CaHTED 1 C A 17 PAle AcrN4 Lor L 1 Uttr)wg DL'S k Tv DA - wni, b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? . c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NDn/E d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: !�) -yrs 11) ge £Esi 624L.V Dr RZ6c TEO fppwN A'R -V page 7of10 D(Z 564 ( E-4-176D 12. Recreation Space Reserved for Agency Comments a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity? '3 tY r 5 i4 D J A C -r0 SGffDn -- Gib /q Ef5 . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. PIv. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: /VD NC , 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 1 vNE b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural important known to be on or next to the site. 1'J/'J& ■ l‹ N c „. N , c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No J t , 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 1 1 - 1 C 5 rgc2 N t J3Y S. e4-Z P 4 3.4¢ ,1 ND W. Nog tit LL BLVD, SEE ENcLaSL- D ,17 PL/}N b. Is site currently serviced by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? yes Ti? dl-rv56T S6��rt: _E Is AV,- 1LP• e OA/ . ` NO0 141 t_L t-LJO c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? L s JJ o nJ E d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 5 4 -11‘) / G Jq- nJ D 5. 44 T N A ✓& _ w t `L NEED To J3 E= ► r+� P ac vE2 p t. oN , 77+E' Frto.J7 4y6' 0E-7 F PiopE ,2yy, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /■ d f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N ET NE TX IF 6'5TI/ AT 7, 490. /JET' WEEJAO.4y M. re/tic '- 1P5 is EsT /wierreo , 69S g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Wt0e/Li 3.1 z... AND 5. 4¢rH TO T OFy lc/444 ST Q. Fflz LOCAL 57fZtE7Y, �NSTA L T E,} -FF/' 5t fj�4L **1 .LNTE GT /0^/ ©F 5.447 - fruJ. NOB H /LL - l4 Alc.zC T/le A)o,2rTh4ND SBJTH / /ZOAcftO5 I4rTHE S 4or tt / page 8of10 W. N05 NIGG zwre - a$E67 /owl 1'0 Spi/T fHfASE OPefR77°' 15. Public Services Space Reserved for Agency Comments a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: FCC 5Scr3LY F/!eE .4ND PoLIGE l ,ZVTtT .CT /orN b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. ELEc TIzi c - ry / N/9 Tvrz-o4 C-7 # „s- ATE e L A 6t. 7 tI 6 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: elity, na'ti !as, v, service, tel:. . e, sa ' er, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. CLEc7/Z1 c NA _ 4, /45 / LA/ A TG Y - ./C IL 7'c c- 6P14 - 0 /v GA /7LE 7 5 rc floc c)7 /G / T /cS /41Z E A 03 4 c1 Jr To T'NE' S,r , N MfhToiZ v T /L- /TY E >c7 E c 5 i v A1S /-f /1/4 6c C A g b r'tl'ie a licant. C SIGNr�T;URC (To be ,completed .� ..... pp- ......) The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date Submitted: ( t 0 2 .-' Signature . 1i f D: � SU, LEIVIENT'SHEET •FOR,NONPRO,J�CT. ACTIONS' (To" kie' completed Uy the �apphcant ) (Do not use!the.following for,p "ro;jectactions.)' : ; :, s, ;: ;.:,,:. i , Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; Space Reserved for production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Agency Comments page 9 of 10 Space Reserved for Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Agency Comments 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. page 10 of 10 SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER E COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE E -1 Letter from Ken Harper on behalf of WinCo to Bill Cook 6 -19 -02 E -2 Response letter from Bill Cook to Ken Harper 7 -3 -02 E -3 E -mail from Jan Way, owner, Mt. Vista Condominiums 7 -12 -02 E -4 Concerns and drawings from Graf Investments, Inc. E -5 Letter from Dick Graf, Graf Investments, Inc. 7 -16 -02 E -6 Letter from John McArdle, owner of 4407 W. Arlington St. 7 -8 -02 E -7 Letter from Dick Graf, Graf Investments, Inc. 7 -29 -02 E -8 Letter from Ken Harper to Bruce Benson requesting comment letters 8 -6 -02 E -9 Letter from Scott Wippel to Dueane Calvin 8 -27 -02 Corporate Real Estate Affiliates, LLC Your West Coast ,Supermarket Specialist August 27, 2ooz RECEIVED A ug AUG 3 0 2002 CITY OF YAKIMq Mr. Dueane Calvin PANNING DIV Water & Irrigation Manager City of Yakima 231 Fruitvale Boulevard Yakima, WA 98902 RE: Proposed WinCo Foods 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. Dear Dueane: The staff report dated August 22, 2002, page 12, paragraph 1, titled Water & Irrigation, indicates the following: "City of Yakima domestic water is available at this location. Irrigation water is also available at a base rate charge of 94 per square foot of total lot area." The WinCo Foods site is approximately 13.90 acres before dedications, thus the referenced fee would be in excess of $50,000. It is my understanding that other commercial developers are disputing this unfair calculation. If it is the city's intent to allocate a cost towards the amount of property we are going to be irrigating, it should be recognized that our landscaping requirement here is 5% of the parking area. We are contributing $10,000 towards a sewer hook-up. This fee was brought up early in the project. This irrigation hook-up fee notice is coming late in the project and at a price that is disproportionate to our use. I have spoken to individuals in the city who agree that this appears to be an unfair allocation, and have indicated that any waiver of this fee or reduction of fee would need your approval and that of the city manager. 1188O 5W Riverview Lane o Wilsonville, OR 97070 o (503) 682-6718 o swippe wippei- group.com INDEX 'epf' I am asking for your consideration of a reduction in fee that is commensurate with the amount of landscaping area this project will be required to have. I thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Scott L. Wippel cc: Bruce Benson Paul Simmons, Jonathan Burtnett Vince Loftus MENKE JACKSON BEYER ELOFSON EHLIS & HARPER, LLP Attorneys at Law 807 NORTH 39TH AVENUE• YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98902 (509) 575 -0313 • FAX: (509) 575 -0351 ANTHONY F. MENKE DAVID A. ELOFSON ROCKY L. JACKSON KIRK A. EHLIS G. SCOTT BEYER KENNETH W. HARPER August 5, 2002 RECEIVED AUG 0 6 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA Mr. Bruce Benson, Senior Planner PLANNING DIV. Department of Community and Economic Development City of Yakima 129 North 2" Street Yakima, WA 98901 Re: Skyland Company, Inc. Dear Bruce: It is my understanding that the public con period for Skyland's proposed land use at Tax Parcel Nos. 181327 -21019 and 181327 -24020 closed on July 25, 2002. Consequently, I would very much appreciate it if you could provide me with copies of any and all comments provided by the public or by any other person or entity (including government agencies) at your earliest convenience. I will, of course, reimburse you for any copying costs. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Ver , s ours, KENNETH W. . ` • RPER KWHlbrb cc: Scott Wippel Filed Hearing Examiner EXH #,E 8 .Date. File # �--- r f t • • G RAF I NVESTMENTS, I nc. RECEIVE . JUL 2 9 2002 July 25, 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes City of Yakima, Dept of Community & Econ Development 129 N. 2 St. Yakima, WA 98901 Re: UAZO RZ #3 -03, UAZO CL (2) and UAZO EC #11 -02 Dear Mr. Maples, This is a follow -up to the letter I sent on July 12 2002. I was in Kennewick yesterday and looked at Winco Foods store on Clearwater Avenue. Behind the store were apartments so the situation here was identical to ours in Yakima. The following was included in Kennewick's Winco development plans to provide a • buffer to the residential property adjoining it: 1. A 10 -foot high masonry wall was erected on all points where the properties adjoined. 2. A l0 -foot landscaping strip was located next to the masonry wall. Plantings included trees and shrubs that were maintained by Winco's irrigation system. 3. Free standing exterior lights were located 75 -80 feet from the property line. 4. The driveway entrance and exit were located at least 50 feet from the property line to minimize braking and acceleration noises associated with the trucks hauling freight. These conditions when actually viewed in person make a lot of sense. I have enclosed photos that support my observations. I would think that Winco would be willing to comply with these items since they have already done so in Kennewick. After reviewing these can you please call me at 697 -4874, I am interested in hearing your thoughts on this matter. Filed Sincerely, Graf Investments Hearing Examiner EXH #,E 7 Date,' - -62 Dick Graf File #, e '-J �aZ 410 South 1st Street • P.O. Box 100 • Selah, WA • 98942 • Tele (509) 697 -4874 • Fax (509) 697 -4600 , w it 4 s ^ r hr. r..7. ,.,,,- ,. ,. . '!'. , ,;:i: :: K y � q y . T I r � .. v to a�F. . _ , _. } { 1 L .r. l t • "•"v - i ,• i , ., X C . , f v r 4 ��y•�yy�y.. 1 " ! r 3 » �.. .f.Y^. aaF F4 1. . . " A /.8161, . 1 � � III 1 A {{ 1 � � k tip r +alp 1 7 r � •» � y 4 +S� y 4 xhh `- 'i ''- ,V rt • /.. le • , �� • sr s 1k 7 . • 41A7�•1 . , ,.... t, -,� : _ ,,_ •,• w r s; .., r r i ? f AI t ;er 8 .. , .. w & r. w ' w�" � ,', ,..,r d, fi x , .. !^Nd+ re 4 �' + +i° ,[ . ,` � /,., ut�Y. {' ' - 1 M fi r t�,'. i q ro 1 c.. , r r. _ _ . .fi . F s ,, : ,.. `� 1x a ';;4E , . ', M1C� r :, ',, ',T c * a . r 3 ,t�j, #}'�� ' '% ,:_ N ii.%r r;.. "a S..aa ri �,. , . Fr a. .;fi, a?: ;_i ., _ r s� r4 •I .k 041,,0 0.?,r,eAt 1,1,-.2,04-41,,,,,,„,,,, r 3 c ' a � d a � t -�" 7 'L't1 • , se r � z ...4....$ ...a�41w__ '''''1'- - - � .y1VY�'M } 1 uad N = ^�t .'sw' z ;,,,-'''''t,`'-'-:'°."-' 5 's .r_ t�.� '' r.1 q ' ¢- 1 s , 4 ...,r' a`' H x s ��.r....P .� s ,, •— ",. "ate s ,4 ' 4 r ' -- `. o-t S .`� r n z .t' - " .2`....'''•"..,' b # R, _ - Pt -r a 1 ' ' 3 • �' — a 1.. .4'0A rw: M _ r, r i � ,' ', ( 1 } f � ' ) 'b w}r ,� J ` r� • • r/; ;. ' �, . , t , 0 r l „ t � t • a 7d' , ¢ < ,,° , , 'pia P r 4 ! N t t kW r t x � 1 ... fw . ,�5 ." ; D 6 +'f" � ` ,,F x'rd`d'"` ' "'ti# . r ; ; : ° a a° t t t • ,. 4 ' 1 4" # . y ff g .; r " t , , ,. . s r 4 dam` ..„ ' � ,, m " � 5 1 i& �f x.. , _ fi a � ¢ t 31 x+ s r f Y 7 �i / i ''.1:74,•''.1"4";- � 1 4' ;,) 144 ' 1' a h `' 7 -' '- o ,' . . g '' ,;''''ir?t :"+. c l ' .. . ' "(;-.4-41-::‘' ,I � ti .. Y a t y „ .,e 1.1rw i- al .{ t S v ° � � r� "'1∎ , - +,M.t y! l �'' r " . a' '¢ sa 4',....,41:t'',.:101',1:`'4, E 'lam � � � F � � J" .. "' t,5 twR''"3 y - " , w � `7" , fr t 1 .,; r f " vJ . • . , •,, . ' "Y"` as ',.14.41"q",, + .+,, * d j< ,.? ' - tt . , ': at ,� +f ' w r ``"0s V ' ( .. x� 1F 1„ • it` 'Y' j '• .. ; A , • 5 Yf v' ^' 'S * � � ‘,4, . i�,,.EC q Y ,. '�i ��1 i t �ryr� r gy" f 2 x Y 3 '� t r� r ! Y v T r.- '" ♦ / *. Y rt ; - �''% j t rr *1! y ' T „."'„1:,, ',; Y� S-� 1-1,"` .;� � d�: i�""r s � / � '�!'_ cl r . '� « .J� • f� ' ' vr' • . k' , ,, : fist t x ' 3 t,Z3l. C -. , 4∎ : . � � i , t^ ‘ 4 ,[ , , s_ *�^ ,� ;,.:4 d .I R i s �, » . . - .1. .,l.i y X "`, ��' `"�'ti d` „ " yty r ,� '° ° C , ., q . ,, ✓ L„,, off t � Y ' r , t , . 44. • • • . " - 11, 1 . , 44124,4 t/t/44 < ' < * t«f 1' 4 .' ,4 YL as f --i • r � gy ' ° � { " 5'� 2 < . , a p t '" p^"c �y}!,r �st!`�k ° k •r r � kt *y � ` . v , "A�E ,t "^"` . , P y �„ -,w y» ', 1, '� a i " r . - a 5 " + P4 , 7 .w s < 1 a st ,° $ ";%''')' ate, _ ^ .,e e ✓ a E - ��.. ,�v 71.'".1,,,A.‘ - �` `;`' �. :' nd q 2-' <^s 4',0 a .t: w +o d, 7` . ,,. .- b r 4-4,--- ' at . ,:. v < i <%„ ,� a la , — ; pp d '° s c t o r ' 6., " y .-. , . -, a s ' st fi �'.n ax Oar „44,..,'--:... 4 "�r , y .g ' • ,, ,, P; �a ,' . . Pr w ' r r.. ° fix '” � [ p , ;+� �• x - 44..!:,-- r 8 r a - d. 's j r r kx . .+ o 4 E f tt,, {.' 1 .. s J " r ; r *'£ :;;-:::::,-/,'?;,-, s s?' +�,� , e:�w a "7 a r . rs u ; ; ' . ,k r1t f° .-,c,, ./` *y } a l''''. . . - 7 ':, ° -:, — 1Pr ' , { , : ` ' v x ,,iiee a " 's � x fill- EL x 4 10 s .''S q .. �. ' < f"" . . ��',, :..,,y,.., a ;t!',.- �s a "If' ' 1 r € x� I . , ; t i @.` . " ,, ` .; .q 1" ... P # PM '3 Y '+- S .;y t � �, w � " ,. S P i `» 1 - ,, s"p p ,A viiii � _ . , a ra. e+^d"'� . , a ` s , gam. -. r ` ,. `ae a 4 , 4 5� w E,ti , airy ' + a, ., P : r s ,(j,iWa p AO /0 cf-- D I` o9 iS S t""'' ' 7er.'f l'-r— fiipt-ts-4-6 - �'� ¢ �Y r T 1•d �k � 04 'h'iti q r r m M I I r' ` a p � , rte" ' �" s ,F' t a.w�'� x� „,! :. , .. , ..: :4 ;'.: , ..4i - :•..,..,': . ..', . x � � � , x ,, ,,w` ta ,. - '� "'' r.w Sri °6 g � � . � +• ` = a t . '? ” ! 9 �,rr�: # r g' y +.f t' .b« sr} e,. «� �L+^ Ys' !h` . ,, i., - 7 d +i: i t pp 33: 14 1 5 1 y� 441'7,,, ":::„.; ‘ ,.,,.: 2 -' ,'?' � ' a _.._ . ''' ." 'xkas�a+a at•�m. .z"�'" —�. , `' xw „a 1 ew. r c' r `� _.w._�.. ; 7fa 1 " 'SLtssb fi i x a a+ . ", r. �, a rz � �{�" � * c�. �` s 4 � , � 7 �g � - �k y am „ - , .w ..,. � • .�.,.: ' m C'- .� 4. ;:., e w + t 7 5� s7 ��' !" Nate" -"' „ �..4^s ��'. , � 4 a, 34 w '�+ • �� a v s . a s 4 sr ° r k "s• ;Z' t ., �`f k ,1: y'; ° ` + x �� ; � ''7 r3' is. "'r , sz-`i .,,'. ., ., y ��� fir 1; ' i , ":::.:: 7' ll .. '.."' .: : . :1'.1': fig} gy�pp.. �9+ X K... .A If 2 °.Ttc 9{ : 1 -;, „,: i .5.: :::: ;.: 1 ''' . i 1 ,::":::: ..: .- : - £ ' 4 •', A� > -` R YS v ml" x Y rpss �� { 3^ 1 . rM r If r r �'h, 7 " Fi � f ^ s� r ' er r{ �.°� . : *�`, K2 4 ' , .. <,..�+%s `. ,.< s , j .. �s .. sir.e,�.1 + � .iy4Hh - a,- . } ,.:, #a ` Z";'.'¢ s"} � w. '°y,�'n3'� RECEIVED ja. 2 3 2002 July 8, 2002 CITY OF Y KID A To: Department of Community & Economic Development PLANNING DIV, Attn: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes & Planning Divisions Re: Notice of Master Application concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. Dear Mr. Maples, I trust the City and Department can understand how much the owners and residents of family dwellings, whether multiple, duplex, or single, next to three schools and various other residential complexes don't want to add the traffic that a "small convenience center" would generate. I have spoken with the neighbors. Three schools generate enough traffic as it is in this neighborhood. There is no need to build a "small convenience center" on Nob Hill at 44 If other businesses can't survive on 40th or Nob Hill when the economy is good, how does a "small convenience center" imagine it will prosper in times of recession? This neighborhood doesn't need any more potentially vacant commercial real estate property /developments. To the south is Ward Plaza/Nob Hill Mall, to the west is Glenwood, to the north are Albertson's and Westpark, to the east is Tieton Village. Because the drive -in theater was "grandfathered" in, zoning -wise, doesn't mean that this is the best use for this property, especially given its proximity to homes and schools. Currently there exists a viable residential neighborhood between Tieton Drive and Nob Hill Boulevard, between Fisher Park Golf Course and 48th Avenue. Please don't compromise the livability of the "Tri- School Addition" any further by approving this unnecessary and unwanted Master Application, or zoning variance. In Bellingham, where I now live, Albertson's was allowed to build a new store right off of a freeway exit in a residential neighborhood. After a great deal of excavation in to a hillside, and construction of a brand new building, intersection and stop light, Albertson's closed after 18 months, leaving a building that is still vacant after three years and counting. in r�' y, f `J hn McArdle Owner: 4407 W. Arlington Street Yakima WA 98908 Filed Residence: Hearing Examiner 1610 Eldridge Avenue // pa- Bellingham, WA 98225 EXH 6 50 ate, 7 File 0, •* 3 -6 z G RAF I NVESTMENTS, I nc. ` U 2002 X17 " Y ' O 1 0 YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. July 12, 2002 Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes City of Yakima, Dept of Coummunity & Economic Development 129 North 2 St Yakima, WA 98901 Re: UAZO RZ #3- 02,UAZO CL (2) #21 -02 and UAZO EC #11 -02 Dear Mr. Maples, We own the property that adjoins the proposed rezone to the north. I have identified it on a copy of the enclosed site layout. While we are not opposed to the rezone in general, there are a few items that need to be considered as conditions to granting an approval. The first is to require an 8 -foot masonry wall that borders the subject property along our shared property line. Our property is zoned residential, the same as the subject property's current designation. For the last 30 years both properties have been residential. The proposed use will for a 24 -hour grocery store and a yet to be identified use for pad B. There needs to be fencing there that will create a buffer between the two uses that addresses both sight and sound issues. The loading docks are all closely located to our property and the commercial truck traffic and related traffic noise makes it important that a masonry wall be installed versus a wooden or chain link fence as the current conditions would allow. We are currently undergoing some major capital improvements to the Arlington Apartments and want it to maintain the "residential feel" that is critical to the property's success. The next concern is With the positioning of the driveway that will provide access to commercial delivery trucks. It is currently positioned on the northerly property line that is just a few feet from the bedroom windows of the Alpenhof Apartments. If there is evening truck traffic this will create major problems for tenants who are sleeping. We would propose the driveway be set back at least 10 feet from the property line and require e r■: 6'arbivataes to be planted (and maintained) inside the masonry fence. This would help E e rr reduce the impact the commercial rezone would have on our residential property. 7 1N , 1/� Our other concern is with South 42 Avenue. The developer's proposal will w =. dramatically increase the traffic on this street. The proposed site plan indicates there will �1 y p p p :�;. be 3 entrances off 42 Ave (including future Pad A). Eisenhower High School, only a''A } ' ; 410 South 1st Street • P.O. Box 100 • Selah, WA • 98942 • Tele (509) 697 -4874 • Fax (509) 697 -4600 block away, will have a direct link to the new store via 42 Ave. The existing street north of the subject's property is inadequate to handle the increased volume of traffic. There are a lot of children in this neighborhood and the pedestrian traffic created from the High School will lead to some serious safety issues because of the narrow street and lack of sidewalks and curbs. I understand the developer's reluctance to make off -site improvements. However, this situation needs to be addressed in some manner. We appreciate your consideration and please let me know what your thoughts are regarding the concerns identified above. Sincerely, Graf Investments 1: Dick Graf President lv ii i ; / 1 A li I I a { i-tl co - - ---- • i I'' ' JO_ - -----mot -'.— r- ■acl■9.' - - --- -- -- -- -- ---- - ---- � -- r — e - E. __ - - .pfr I F q. „ ___ z TI e irA " ', s ■' • 1331.14 • 7 ' I 1 / - ! p r' -- —Fay -- ! f o r , 1 r ��T _� Lyn 'F I E F■FF E\'''..77.1-_. , 0. l _ � gg 11 If 1 ° p q a 1 aiiH ' o� il. . I 1 t w ..,.. sw ■ , ICJ 1111_1 1 1 1 i l'R � j6 �`� �\ ` , ' A � ' \ v. . 1 , , H $ !Nil di I8 a y \\ \ 111 EEE _ .II 1 i:\`, R I� � N 1 I I 1 J �� V 1I 8 T S h '• 11 - \ 1 1 I ! i I 1i y I •� j t 8 t + � y Q �( 1 �r 1 O I 1 al. 1 I, l y r,,, 77 1' 1 .., ii /p ii I P N v � r r 1 ( 5 \ [s i -i�. r I II 1 il 4 iii3 �;r gll � II a k I. — saagne 1114 1 v 1, . r� I fi lig Pit li i i g® g I d Fc p ! \ f 5 A A'- i ' i Z �` C \ Al A n , R ,; P y 0 • F�� 1 - . ♦ i 11 oi A � R N e - , ro g5 , i 1 FF�7 4 ' Ti'° a a 5 ti a -k 1 19 •71 pp 1I '15 t2 ; ali III i 5 i i l 0119. 0 ..011 M :x 11 ill VI aiil> gi Y 6 f6 Mt $ t i 1 , 17 J F r ' 1 i x s l III li N , = IT111 \ I ... ! g i t � 4 � � ` I _ I -- ; it ` I F g ll 4 'x i {I' { 110 / 1111 6. aR ''M Y I" C. B I � ' � `r e v - t f S 7 ' 4 .. J y.r _ ; n . ,.7Y ',,,,,, a �,, m , k r }' . � I k 4 I .---- 3076g - 7 J!■11B M ( � tl I 11 , 401 !a i s —• 4 "I yl'' NP I11 I r o 'ro I ll r ��ER R'� R i I i a "`6'i.`.r: ,Ii II • id 1�° II � � � § � � �� � �� � � ; � `\ �"5'\ I p� , { �hkK , h� +J65EF��l -. ao-.i �,. '1 y : QX p 1t� fy p Q : k" A. 97�E. -Y hF`7A�slRfl . + . %:a II'I 1 $ :FIM i U9�1 1. " !,' I, u+ .. - trim 3.NiY.11 u • 1 I e e li 1 a , �* jhr I I per` •`" is g 44; IN � 54 S I I \l. 71� ' 1 :1 117 I o 117 4 N , i e - 1; 4 _� r vSl•i f "Oat M •. r 1 4 : 3 q3 N sk ,! o< ....Ills Ka/I R �a a _ ,1 . '- i , PRELIMINARY LAYOUT A , a ;� " J -U -8 ENGINEERS. Inc. f 4 , _1 111 :� - ( SA! 4fi!1U coin' II 1 INC - 14/O Wad Molar AwAdam q / � ^ ma y IP � �$ ��$ ?<: CLk � , EYISItl„_.,.,.......,-..d'- ,,.a1.t,� eau00$311 \f`�■WI■1 ..S..... ` ^ ' $ YAK IMA, WASHINGTON Q-- Phenol 509-785-1144 raa 5011-756 -ono �ir�S � . 7 t . / f�� o/ sT/, w.o0Ws 6,- trivi 1 2 2 ) N/ / ' i R r >„. l x. y ' d y I •IIif ' 1 I 1 s r 1 s µx yf �>, , s, i 'KR44 ty ID x f 'a' . ' . , .,,Ir-f.1 4 / : %,,,: il'' '.,, : . , ? • • . 1 ' ' 't , . e ' ''. ; . , ' • 4. .: e „ ,;;. ,,, ,,c ,,....1.1i' ' , - , . • •.°.. • ,. . .s. .:,,,t ,...s, `:f'ki-: 't' " n ' • t; 7 , ' ',1 , 410 '11, ■•i, t Ihr 4 # , 4 , , $ I at , A, • ,„, -0 i * • -7r,,kr ' ' • 1, 4 " ,• ".* .1"....v.i.,0,-.., fr •,' 172,„ P,14.-- ." An- ,.$....- -. 3 ,. ....-WA " ' :( t ..,,,... ,, •.* v , . t-,, - , ,, '''',. 1 I. A • Tr, 1 ...t.....,,,, • . . ..,..., ........,,.....,.„„,:., - • .-- — • - ,,. .. . .. . • 1.. 4 114:141/4 ' . . _ .. ' - 'Z,, . 141 . 11 ‘` 4 , 4 "!-- 4 1' ' tl''...0.*: '''. .. . '94,11!-Air.. - , • 0 , • tl. 4 -' . - • _ . . IL . ... .. , • • *-X4 L 70-f VI A ig- i ... , . , - — te- .., -- .....; er- / (/ / 0 I; Ve-,.."-e-ite% 1 . . • 1 . , ' ___.: i 1 I I 1 1 . L -- — ------- — 1 • 1 ___ . , .. I I R-1 , _, ----, • --; , , „ ,1 • , i : 1 . . , ! : : 11 • o ,A,(2.L,) nl 1 I 1 • c p i d e. „ 4 0 e ..--"r ki-vro 11 , i • I , i: tla-cArl vsfitt? /7 1 III I . Il— i 1 I I i , m '.1 i l 1 i A , • ----. 1 . ‘ II tyv-e- , 3 --9 _____—A ii — IL IMO:1A'; iii E Eff 1 . : A /44:P75 DCA/ ""r 1 . ---: , _ , L-I 7 1 c : •--i I le Sikee--1 I , ii;..:-i;i;i,!:.:=;!,;,Q4'1,:::.;.;.:4.1 IIII — . ! 1 r••,7 1 ,11,,,:,1:::::;,'14-$:::,::;,,kI Z. \\ 1 i 1 • 1:::iI I • • 11• ItIll 1 ) ; t Ii;,' ' ■ ,iewmit, I .1111:191r , i - 1 MilMj ::!:,,,, ,i*1 ) 1 1 .:.:1,::,: ' ! i 1 , , i. :71,0: \ 1 1 . , J ..,:,,•:::.,:,„::„.,,,,,,,,,,,, ------ 1 G 1 NV EST S T 410 South 1st Street Serb w4 k i .„.., R A F N • , :a" ''''' Ill i i m. 1 ° i ".'.\''':,':::5)!:ig.::,;R:.:''''.;;• p` ' 1 ■—"'°-"°' °'' '''' ---' 1 / \ 1 / li JEN Pl ) i i I --- - I I ** ‘----- / Th // %.1 ... —1-- ---....„ 1 : t 1 1 H , ,2_ ,.. _ ,,,,.,,, w ......_„...:„.......ar,vro„,,,,,•,,,,...,,,,,,,,,I,,, / „, , ./. • , ./ „...... CI-4 WAY ) ' w., / /,,....:,' ,, / \ 1 i LI <, _.> , ,../ , i■ii i____i ' CD p xopey , p( Le” 4-0 ; 0 #4 • " • . _ :::; , ! , i R •,'> I I i tf.t"7 B. 0 or i N WAY , H I • .',? . / , I C CC — 70 13t-2701-06,41 1 1 ! ----, 1 . 1 OA) 7 i)i..x..r?"/' a A) : M Dug- 0 r Ne4-0.04-e-) —e.4 1 1 1 CL-tiCe.. 14,,, ( - 4 .1 41 " / C 0 CITY OF YAKIIVIA, .f Information Ser /ve... FILE NO: EC# 1 1 -02,CL(2)#2 1 -02,RZ#3- s()! 2 " 744 7 2. • r ( APPLICANT: SKYLAND COMPANY L 44,2-4-y /vat l'/ 4 t- REQUEST: REZONE —SEPA & CL2 R C e E ' '/ 7i2e- 7 .,,,,, 3 TO CONS'I RUCT A SUP x 1 1 4. 4v/ze A/ Aexege7 Avata. LOCATION: 4309 W NOB HILL BLVD; . ; , r — rxt — —�.,— . - -' ♦ 4. 3 1{,:1.00 S. BAR - -- - _ p.,a : ! '�ylf'"" . _ ' .. x. ,..v.a.,.t.A..y.-.,� -2.1 Malt rr i i g 1 L • �. ` , f►..�a.+r, rn..m.�arsl.t - .A∎∎0111 �1Yl.% \ i ' 3 _Fc du su>Y1 31021 na/ 11 , , . �v c 1 Y' t f ✓ 4 1 i P `, / i y , }1414 1111L.2.*. ' r j d�• s VIM t> MS B }9 C tit 3 1 - ul ,r� a A i a . .- i ,1,,,�� ��� .������ HH r � 1I1I111 {f1 II11If / ‘.,,-,,,,,./ iu, It :.r. 5 , . ii,, 1/ d aei- ' 'il ':',.*-'-- :: 9.. ..''-'!' I : 111111111111.12 _.,........ O . r� s . , _j f ',' J ' r 7 , d J 'J do ,„ i s - 11 � ��h v' � A i ■-• • ... :....,- 3JYid t •?100 1� 'acaa ww, ,•I as i 0!!0,0'1 azol7H3 - - � p •r4aa"' 1 \ , \, - -.. a gyy f. y bSF y _ 6LSC[ 3 1flA4D0 S '�9C'49 3 .L9.1i �+ \ �. ri g � . ' Mr) V / I F!. �\ \ 13 Ect '� 1 IaM 7Nr7YadJ 'M94N �Ol C ittY3 d7f8l�A- ' ' _ � : I I ny 1!4 N r `� •�� 0Vd 313a� I 5 ; . a. .. O 1 a351Y9 1 f s�tpv ro'6 + IB _ }q � y _- _.--- F{ I 6LOfZ 'i3 gay 1aTd Y ION f 1 3 131BN19fldP14 �� i iU 1 l I1Il W IIIL1 11111 1) f PPi a ��Y u t -/+ 1 19 • -t l a is lzte x ,a�•cel I +n � f - c' 't - - ( � a1.am Sts 3 1 SUM �4 f I •1 I " I 1 r 4 31027 N3 810YZ 'Bared r. __ :x4 0 $ H r .p 4•. 4 gg ° / , I. •a �� m _ - _ _ ry_ �4 __... - _ - _ J "' _ - - _ - s - a - 21.14 iti pv y y. � m �m &my Al "44),14 \ u -:,• �i r- 'Kps�'i LA --:�- +- n- +- :- w- +t-- r4 -.`- e- w -4r-el +�- .IL .�frPA - _?o' b� m - - - --- - sari - -_ _ "--449--1.- - --- — ____ - §p _ _ea.— P 1740 Lx3 BCiWOHY18 � iii +m+t �•w•�+.a 1.-2 0316DZ 3Av MX* 8 d0 300 1331 1 LIM Li. No Zl 3ILK , v312 3241 CGI1Y0a1 '100.479 3109®1 mom Nov 3Z 07602011d OOl ........mar4. ail ellS) Y311Y 8811 031,701 1001439 Aart1X3 f313 AVILA@ • rage 1 011 Benson, Bruce From: DenBarWay @aol.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:20 PM To: bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us Subject: (no subject) July 12, 2002 To: Bruce Benson Senior Planner City of Yakima From: Jan Way Owner, Mt. Vista Condominiums, Yakima (41st and 42nd Avenue off of Arlington ) denbarway @aol.com Re: Notice of Master Application concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02 and UAZO EC #11 -02 (WINCO Food store) I am writing this email to clarify some questions I have regarding the above referenced subject. I have two questions that I would like answered. 1. According to the map and information contained in the material sent to us, 42nd Avenue will be improved only half way between Nob Hill Blvd and Arlington St. Are there any city plans to improve 42nd Avenue all the way to Arlington? If so, in what time frame? 2. The material indicates that the City of Yakima standard screening plan C will be used on the north side of the property. What is screening plan C and how does it differ from screening plan A which will be used on the west, south and east sides of the property. I look forward to hearing from you and thank you, in advance, for your time. Jan Way Filed Hearing Examiner EXH # E "3 Date 7- /Z -0 z File # ' 3 - 62 7/15/2002 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT '' 129 North Second Street 1 ,;, : , Wyk? s Yakima, Washington 98901 � Phone: (509) 575 -6113 • Fax (509) 575 -6105 William R. Cook, Director July 3, 2002 Mr. Kenneth W. Harper Menke, Jackson, Byer, Elofson, Ehlis & Harper, LLP 807 N 39 Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Re: WinCo Foods, Inc. Dear Mr. Harper: Thank you for your letter of June 19, 2002 concerning the land use applications submitted by Skyland, Inc. to the City of Yakima. Currently, as you've noted, the Comprehensive Plan amendment process to redesignate approximately three acres of land from high density residential to neighborhood commercial has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Regional Planning Commission. The tentative schedule for the ensuing processes envisions that the City Council will hold their public hearing on the Comp Plan amendments on August 6, 2002. If approved at the hearing, staff will be directed to bring back an ordinance for Council to formally adopt their decision at the on August 20 Council meeting On August 22, 2002 Skyland's master application, consisting of a Rezone from R -3 to SCC and a Class (2) application for 24 -hour operation, will be heard by the city's hearing examiner. At the August 22, 2002 hearing the SEPA environmental review will have already been completed and incorporated into the staffs findings and recommendation. Absent any problems, the hearing examiner should issue his written recommendation to the City Council in time to set the date of the rezone public hearing on September 3 for a hearing date of September 17 If approved by Council, the rezone ordinance will be prepared and formally adopted on October 1, 2002. This ordinance will become effective 30 days following the date of publication, which in this case should be November 3rd_or 4th. The schedule, as set forth herein, remains tentative to the extent that there always potential circumstances beyond anyone's control. Admittedly, this schedule is tight, but I feel that it is both realistic and achievable. We have yet to see an issue that would alter our staff recommendation to approve both the Comp Plan amendment and the rezone, and we look forward to the successful completion of your project Yours tr 1,' , Filed ' Hearing Examiner William. Coo _ py irector of Community and Economic Development EXH # �- . Date ( R- 2 - ri 0 Yakima File :,. achy Cable T.V. 575 -6092 •Code Administration 575-6121 • Neighborhood Services 575 -6101 • Planning 575 -6183 Engineering 575 6111 1994 MENKE JAC SON S' EYER ELOFSON E HARPER, LLP Attorneys at Law 807 NORTH 39Th AVENUE° YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98902 (509) 575 -0313 • FAX: (509) 575 -0351 ANTHONY F. MENKE DAVID A. ELOFSON ROCKY L. JACKSON KIRK A. EHLIS G. SCOTT BEYER KENNETH W. HARPER June 19, 2002 Mr. William Cook Director Community and Economic Development City of Yakima 128 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Re: WinCo Foods, Inc. - Dear Mr. Cook: This letter is written as confirmation of the expectations shared by the City of Yakima (the City) and WinCo Foods, Inc., an Idaho corporation, (WinCo) with respect to the land use permit processing of a new proposed WinCo grocery store to be located north of Nob Hill Boulevard between S. 42nd and S. 44th Avenues within the City. This office represents WinCo for purposes of advising WinCo on development permit processing for this project. WinCo understands and acknowledges that the Growth Management Act affects the procedures by which rezones are processed by the City. WinCo also understands that certain State Environmental Policy Act reviews and processes will be necessary for the project's approval. Finally, Class (2) review will be required to enable the proposed store to maintain hours of operation after 10:00 p.m. 1. The project and. associated parcels The project is expected to consist of a supermarket of approximately 79,000 square feet and will be located on assessor's parcel numbers 181327- 24019, 24028, and 24020. Of these three parcels, 24028 consists of approximately 9.65 acres and is presently zoned Small Convenience Center (SCC); 24019 is zoned High Density Residential (R -3) and consists of approximately 2.3 acres; 24020 shares the same zoning designation (R -3) and is approximately .83 acres in size. Filed Hearing Examiner � } E- 1 Date ( 3 ` - -2— Mr. William Cook June 19, 2002 Page -2 According to the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance ( YUAZO) Table at 4 -1, a grocery store with hours of operation after 10:00 p.m. is a Class (2) use in the SCC zoning district. As a Class (2) use, the use would be considered "generally permitted" but subject to compatibility review. The proposed grocery store is not a permitted use in the R -3 zone. Consequently, a comprehensive plan map amendment, together with a rezone, will be necessary for parcels 24019 and 24020. 2. Comprehensive Plan map amendment Pursuant to YUAZO 15.23.060, the Regional Planning Commission (RPC) is charged with the duty to "monitor the growth and development of the Yakima urban area and continually reevaluate and recommend revisions to the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan." Under the current Future Land Use Map (Map III -3) of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, the southern portion of the proposed project site is designated Neighborhood Commercial, and the northern portion is designated High Density Residential. During the comprehensive plan amendment process, WinCo will request to change the High Density Residential portion of the project site to Neighborhood Commercial. It is our understanding that the RPC is recommending approval of such a comprehensive plan amendment for parcels 24019 and 24020. The RPC's recommendation is expected to be submitted to the joint City /County legislative body for consideration in early- to mid -July. 3. Rezone Pursuant to the Growth Management Act, changes in the local zoning map are generally allowed only after appropriate underlying changes to the applicable comprehensive plan. Assuming due implementation of a comprehensive plan amendment as outlined above, WinCo has asked for a rezone of parcels 24019 and 24020 to Small Convenience Center. This zone is identified in the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance as the preferred zone for a supermarket. This rezone will allow the operation of the proposed grocery store, subject to Class (2) compatibility review for hours of operation after 10:00 p.m. Mr. William Cook June 19, 2002 Page -3 Since a site plan has been created for the proposed grocery store, this will be a project - specific rezone request. Should the comprehensive plan amendment process occur as described above, WinCo understands that the City would be prepared to formally act upon the rezone application by September. The rezone application would first be sent to the Hearing Examiner for the City of Yakima (presumably in mid- September) for a recommendation determination. We have been informed that it is realistic for WinCo to expect that the City Council will be able to review the Examiner's recommendation in early- to mid - October. 4. Class (II) review As mentioned immediately above, WinCo understands that Class (2) review will be necessary to enable hours of operation after 10:00 p.m. As a project - specific rezone request, compatibility issues will be identifiable and appropriate mitigation, if any, can be readily evaluated for the purposes of Class (2) compatibility review. WinCo anticipates that the processing of the rezone will proceed simultaneously with the Class (2) review analysis for hours of operation. Appropriate applications for Class (2) review have already been submitted. 5. SEPA issues WinCo also anticipates that environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) will proceed in conjunction with other aspects of project review. SEPA rules provide for the consolidation of environmental review when proposals, or parts of proposals, are related to each other closely enough to be, in effect, a single course of action. (See, WAC 197- 11- 060(3)(b)). In this situation, the comprehensive plan amendment, the rezone, and the Class (2) compatibility review are all a part of an integrated proposal to locate a grocery store on the site. Thus, WinCo anticipates a single, consolidated SEPA environmental review process. Despite the fact that compatibility (and SEPA issues) can be difficult to determine in advance of public comment, WinCo expects that traffic mitigation issues will be the primary significant impact on the local land use environment. WinCo has Mr. William Cook June 19, 2002 Page -4 already taken the step of retaining Kittleson & Associates, Inc., to prepare a transportation impact analysis for the project. This study has been commissioned as an element of SEPA compliance as well as the City's Transportation Capacity Analysis review. WinCo understands that the City will consolidate all environmental review application documents for the actions proposed herein. In summary, WinCo very much looks forward to working through these matters with the City. WinCo realizes that land development in the State of Washington is often a rather complicated process. Careful consideration, in advance, of the necessary steps in that process can be helpful to all parties. WinCo understands that the City has accepted all necessary applications for the project as complete. If the City is aware of any additional necessary applications or believes that any of the submitted applications need additional support, then please bring this to my attention as soon as possible. Finally, if there is any reason why WinCo cannot or should not expect that City staff will support the development of the project as set forth herein and in the filed applications, please let me know. WinCo wants to work cooperatively with City staff so that legitimate concerns and questions can be addressed in an efficient manner. Consequently, a favorable recommendation City Council) is staff keyegoal for (including the Hearing Examiner WinCo in this process. If this letter does not comport with the City's own expectations with respect to this matter, or if any of WinCo's stated expectations are not, in the City's view, realistic, then we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with City staff so that my client will be better equipped to coordinate its efforts. Ye rs truly, '4111 I E • i T . HARPER KWH:srb Cc: client SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER F APPLICATIONS EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE F -1 License Agreement RE: Winco Food, Inc. / City of Yakima 6 -24 -02 F -2 Rezone Application 7 -2 -02 F -3 Class (2) Application 7 -2 -02 ' CITY OF YAKIMA: -- o fY.y 1 i�° 1 i / .- , , JAND USE APPLICATIO 4 b i s >:.;. DEPARTMENT OF CO MMUNITY AND EC ONOMIC DEVELOPI T '' 200 • 129 NORTH SECOND S TREET. 2 ND FLOOR p i O F `� • Is. i= Ni/VG �� ~ c°', ",..... to -- YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98901 Ni /fit /44 ' VOICE: (509) 575 -6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6105 D /k "�.. P R s ¢ >r �y . :t tiF vr'r . i r H t �s": � `�' F1;�'S S� t t), �..I I< I t x "I � •�• �� W k *, 4,'� t , e ., Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CER 1"thICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. n y t. 5 [ t � � >- '�� a�s s � k �:: S � w. x •ter.•- �+ca�y„ x pia v xr� � <w,\. � ` x L. W ...�'Q � ( y' v J a y, . S t, t , .up � '�. h ,' t `'. y � IS .TSi , ,.... °«. +:5 , 'C. �v:H� � .' '•�v`�i�'�°�°�'Y @ ! ' ` ��` k i'; ro��` � � .•aF�•"ai�� +E 1. APPLICANT NAME 551c w...11-Aj 0 Go e.,i p1 / .=NG , 2. APPLICANT ADDRESS STREET p, 0 . 6 D x 4 oo CITY W op 6vizi J AND PHONE NUMBER STATE 0 R ZIP PHONE (5 MESSAGE 3. APPLICANT'S INTEREST CHECK ❑ OWNER ❑ OWNER REPRESENTATIVE IN PROPERTY °NE CONTRACT PURCHASER ❑ OTHER 4. PROPERTY OWNER NAME (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) 0 OvC -5 H-, (- rAD') 5. PROPERTY OWNER'S STREET Zo C ,, 6771 A vE ° r T -� g CITY y eellcivui /4 ADDRESS AND PHONE (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STATE ft- ZIP co 7 C/ PHONE (7j ) .1-6" 3 Z l 7' MESSAGE ( ) 6. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY: d I el 327 — Z4 #' 1€13Z7- 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: p 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: (1' t / of T+ 5E ` V g oFT s /0 I of 5b" 27 T13N lz19 cw/24 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 120 (2) Use ❑ Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Class (3) Use ❑ Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Short Plat Exemption ❑ Rezone ❑ Appeal ❑ Shoreline ❑ Variance ❑ Nonconforming Structure/Use ❑ Utility Easement Release ❑ Home Occupation ❑ Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner ❑ Administrative Adjustment 0 Short Plat ❑ Other fp„• if : . ;''''71 r b'1 .t ;' aa•" t tt6 °6- ', Taal : C°B ,ia >kk: z M < ::t 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS W x ,._ ; t "`.: "r '6 — "c -v a � `' .�" e r u *` C f r ` ¢Y, .', • .. -, yz � , ^r s z i x t w , .,:.., : � .;.r , y � ••�..,.,, , i. , ..., � � �,.. + ��H �,?s °�,n t* �s �:`Sn ce . 11. I certi that th information on this application an' . e required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. d( (4/ r ' 5 124( b2 S GNATUR DATE Revised ` -' : FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY Films ' -a: 2.=, .: FILE NO . Hearing ill :l,' " - K' DATE FEE PAID RECEIVED BY AMOUNT RECEIPT N HEAR G • TE -� 0... \ 5 1 ,y .�u I C(� ExH # ,,I, _ „ File #_�� 3—O7- — : ,-. CITY OF YAKIMA tic. . - AND USE APPLICATION V DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT `.% • t� n2 ' 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR „ ~ ch R �a ' YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98901 ; e AA 7.,D = VOICE: (509) 575 -6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6105 .. ssv;� a. , '�,�«....w' - k' st°''.." r3 . w 1) X ' '" ^ cd t, 18 3 f tat.' ._. .._ : • c.�,�a��:,^ l`�aQ Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART Pd - CER ITICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. 1; p yv,„ ,; k , p,:w s.aa�..a a �.�.`"` x e �.t }�,ir rR a •�3. g;"ts•. :•y.' as. sx.:.+ a '.w .oai., Wit 7 , iq tom t g g w iy' �l y y T a a t + �t YS d l �# t& E�.E ! = l� rA` y ,93` S c ii a * x.5.8. z`�`�?l ; r r ; ^ X ' e " x = � ` K , ' a , : A. w A : ,, 'ek' ?< 4 . ,.. ,. � .. lOA�Al `G85oI �....._. .., .fir � ^..�..�: '. 1. APPLICANT NAME cJ K Y L A4 iv D G O ✓— P A-IU v t S / v G. 2. APPLICANT ADDRESS STREET p 0, 3 cc 4. 00 CITY w00 AND PHONE NUMBER D RU R/ STATE O 1 2 .. ZIP c:(7 PHONE( - 3) 9 -6 ?4 MESSAGE ( ) 3. APPLICANT'S INTEREST CHECK ❑ OWNER ❑ OWNER REPRESENTATIVE IN PROPERTY ONE CONTRACT PURCHASER ❑ OTHER 4. PROPERTY OWNER NAME . (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) C-, R. E G-, A"ioe - e.$GVt) 5. PROPERTY OWNER'S STREET / C 5 —I T FF ,4. I/G , CITY y,*... 1 rq— ADDRESS AND PHONE *- 5-07 � g / (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STATER ZIP `�gGOZ PHONE (5c Z ) MESSAGE ( ) 6. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY: z 4 vzg 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 6 4 G 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1' OF W. N00 I I L t /3c . 13E S. 4Z ND A-ve A-aD 644Th A-v6, 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Ei lass (2) Use ❑ Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation • Class (3) Use ❑ Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Short Plat Exemption ❑ Rezone ❑ Appeal ❑ Shoreline ❑ Variance ❑ Nonconforming Structure/Use ❑ Utility Easement Release ❑ Home Occupation T Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner ❑ Administrative Adjustment ❑ Short Plat ❑ Other ^"Jl tSi ` RE g r M �+ , : rOM � p r 2 t pc Y � � � "�.�"Mkc Vfi 8 VI + ? frY Ev' " < Y�; �� ' w� `•���.. � �� � � C` ;. .� ' � G' fA cj r . �' , � � � .d.� 4 '^ b ° �' ' 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 4i i i5 ✓ : 42 Y" c s c .' t3 r P". vY.tr g:`: £ { q.r>=i4s•`„°..:t' k iii f'A.e Wig'*, w�o .; a 11. I cer&ify that th information on this appli ation and th- required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. i 7 '1 1 0 t. ' c -- - ( ‘1 1 /- IA) SIGNA ?7i ' E DATE R evi s e F ry d9 -'8 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY FILE NO. DATE FEE PAID RECEIVED BY AMOUNT RECEIPT NO. HEARING DATE ` J UtTLtlVIhN 1AL APPL1t2A11UIN rotc: gy p, ter, I ! • ' �:;' CLASS (2) REVIEW ❑ CLASS (3) REVIEW •• x a %� ''�y9:o- be: CHAPTER 15.14 AND 15.15, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) r ,,9 ?+ • .Ew ,3 - iF - zy s H - f ae y „ .a Sri"£ ., fS.. - n t , , " a s f is.. -. pA .:: w� o c JS. i�. <'� ifr r '( .:4 otkl*xg ,; G ¢ 9 e r Sw:`"-n�.xr ?s t it +twivtnl. .%�:i F w •'� '` 'R` .r.- .w.- �s.., . a �:�r"IR x u�c' a. a�Y.. u. .,..a...- r....'a,.,.�:c'�ia�Fa' Sc�vr .w. .. r,- .�aa" - 1. PROPOSED LAND USE TYPE (Important: Must be taken From Table 4-1, of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance) c?/zoc Ezy %o./v6N/ / e .57 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (Attach if lengthy) S c e A- 77 r9 DE e-R-I PT IoN 5 =` g}2 `>rte {� ri'�3� ^^`xiRp •eve 5 x r F - r mem.r 5 ' '--� m `.� ?d- s,*��� w r, .•5. ?�er {�'" ` y, "� Y �`t, r ^� i - t U a j t 4: Y E! l d ka r Cab' t3'J ,` a s x ..., ."�v'.,.t4!`k:Hm,P.S4C,�s " -' ,�S`.'XY3sSa'5 t a x�+',.".: �. c,. tt:.L �i�•: L'�..I.ww�iu.'.iam + i.'._ . •lt`•�" ,�.:L$:.u$:1.ts�' 5. SITE PLAN REQUIRED: (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) 6. A WRITTEN NARRATIVE: (Please answer the following questions in the narrative) A. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? 7. AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (If required by the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)) Note: If you have any questions about this process please come in person to the Planning Division, 129 North 2nd St. Yakima, WA or call the Planning Division at (509) 575 -6183, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY For Class (2) Applications, the proposed development requires Class (2) Review for the following reasons: ❑ Listed as a Class (2) use in Table 4-1; or, ❑ Structural or other physical site improvements are proposed or required by this title, and the use has frontage on a designated collector or arterial road (single- family dwellings, duplexes, and their accessory structures are exempt from this provision); or ❑ All or part of the parcel proposed for development is in the Flood Plain, Airport, or Greenway Overlay Districts; or, ❑ The proposed use includes hazardous materials; or, ❑ A mobile or manufactured home listed as a Class (2) use in Section 15.04.120. LRevised 9 - 98 Legal description of Parcels #181327 -24019 and #181327 -24020 The North 642.50 of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 north, Range 18 east W.M.; EXCEPT the North 488.125 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 30.00 feet for street AND the North 642.50 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, W.M., EXCEPT the North 333.75 feet thereof and EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet for street. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. Legal Description of Parcel # 24028 The West 1 /2 of the Southeast 1 /4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, W.M., EXCEPT the South 41.5 feet for public road and right of way of Yakima Valley Transportation Company, AND EXCEPT the North 642.5 feet. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. Class 2 Review Application Part III- Required Attachments Section 6- Written Narrative: A. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for business, describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. The proposal is to construct a 79,000 s.f. supermarket on approximately 12.79 acres. There will 621 parking stalls on the site, as well as landscaping to meet the City of Yakima requirements. The supermarket will be open 24 hours a day, seven days per week. Approximately 250 people will be employed with approx. 20 -50 employees per shift. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? There are schools to the west, residences and business' to the south, and residences to the north and east. The proposed supermarket would enhance all of these properties. Mitigation measures will include installation of City of Yakima standard screening plan A on the west, south and east sides of the property. City of Yakima standard screening plan C will be used on the north side of the property. C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? The proposal is consistent with the current zoning of parcel 24028. Parcels 24019 and 24020 are currently zoned R -3, and an application to rezone these parcels to SCC will be submitted. The proposal is consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties that are zoned R -1, R -2, R -3, B -1 and B -2. Approx. 9.63 acres of the proposed development is currently zoned SCC. D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? Yes. The proposed development will promote commerce and is compatible with neighboring land uses. The development will enhance the overall welfare of the community. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST ....,. - r � .... : ,.7. w_ r : �•�.,:,.. ,,. ;. ,. �.2r ..r.;:. S ir jj• : r: ...... ... ,�. .. ,..., ...�I: ..... .._ �..•. ,�.r..l -•,1 _I, - s :...� .115 .L:. _ n�:G.r 1 rc`i'� - iq �J.ti ...... ..... .... r.... .... 1_ _.. _.... n.,. .,.1 .,...,, .,:... ._ ..... +. r__ ...., —. .- Ems. F . ,: -._ ^ •:1"b._ - - .F:+1r `P,�,.:t �`_ _t -i: ,..e��.:i;.:. "; h:':.. . .... ,...� r. . ,... ... .. .... . .. . .... ... ..,.: , .,. _,,... .. ,... ......,.J- . <, r -. ,1 . &L.. qa:_ ..�.' - .,Er ..}r. „`�.i:•':Yo ° °::1 ¢ .., ... .,.,.. , ....,... -.. , w. -.� ... ..:..:..... . ... ..:..... .-_ r _... _ --. � � �.. - ..C2` •'taw �'L+�'':r �i ^ 7.. r , ,.., � . .... ..... .. .. ......... ..J, .! „.6 .r ...,.u, d..- :w.. .r rt.-,. .. y]_ +i .- Y: -. _�l1 -� v.'7b.... .;•1�.'n .1W 1... C.. - -_ Please complete this checklist and include with your final site plan. The site plan must contain all pertinent info'liia- tion. Items not applicable to the proposed project shall be so noted. If you have any questions please call or come in person to the Planning Division 129 N. Second Street, 2nd Floor,or phone (509) 575 -6183. • _.F' •:i � 1.7 ::;iarj:i.i Ali + ?�'= xP�: ?�fAr:�' 'p': -... •..,...._. ,.., ..., : . .., .,.�. -.,i .r.� L. n . -, � ;- _:-�' - .J1:1 p e c't. �,�. : ., _r- ''.,:,. .. _,r.r. .:. ,.. r ._ i� .o. .., .. �,._, 'I _ c_,I �__:.. .-y ".� n .. il. ...u.. ui ::' F _ = ': - G!�:.' -,i 34�"':.'.. 'err :i �;. �,, ...- .:,.:'- , >.._1...,... �: ?... I...f. r ...... .... :.. .:l t!, ...,:. ..: .._r ..i _._... ... ...� .I .( .T?. 3: „b,. _ ..1 :� :! .J= ",'.'' %' -t„ , _.�.l r..� �.. :. r._. e.r- .., � _ J..I. f'r. .,. f.. rir:, .. r; �..., -.. _ 1 �•.:r.,h �l..rn . s . '�t � -'�l'" . >e .., ra�r .;N,- - = " >,.. . ter t..., . s .,.. r.::; , �_x., ,.,.. n :. ;. 1.. ._ .i � .. ai ar`TS r :2 _ 4 ( 7 ,4 ., >. _.,,__. ;. ,. .. if..:.,. .J,.. ,.� t £ . .l.d. ..._r :. ...�. t .f..:...,r, :_... _ ... ..s,. ..<...5.:.9_, »Ti .: ,_ s 'nf ':.rV � "'�":= ' ef. tra' {'G _:,_u.,i;: . ti. .r. ..,.�.i ., �...1 ., .. :U u._.. ri, "i„ ,- J., .. ... ,. ,. �.�... .,, ..- : T _ i7].,r t.^E -�: R' •: r „ a �L3 v7.:.GIC :. ...d } <> . <, ... - 3r.- ..,,Ir: r. i ,,. _ �,. �..r -�- .,:_'µ- _ T:Y,. :.�.. ..r.F.:i "�•..E .. - e Y ' �: i.. , Check all boxes as: Included -P.- Not Applicable e 1) The site plan shall be legibly drawn in ink on paper of sufficient size to contain the required infoiniation, but not less than 8 -1/2" x 11” for Class (1) projects or 11” x 17" for Class (2) projects. O 2) All site plans shall be drawn to standard engineering scale. The scale shall best fit the paper. The scale used shall be indicated on the plan. (Suggested scale provided on site plan template). • [(3) Site address and parcel number. 2" Zoning district of subject site and adjoining properties. Q 5) Property boundaries and dimensions. Zj6) Names and dimensions of all existing streets bounding or touching the site. 7 7) Dimensions, location and use of proposed and existing construction. [►]" 8) Structure Setbacks. re9) North Arrow. 4 0) Lot coverage with calculations shown on the plan. • -El- 11) Location and size of any easements. -B"12) Location and type of existing and proposed landscaping including landscaping located within the public right -of -way. -0. 13) Location and size of existing and proposed side sewer and water service lines. .�14) Adjacent land uses. C✓]r15) Location and size of all parking spaces with the parking calculations shown on the map. 2'16) Location and dimensions of proposed or existing driveway approaches. _0-17) Vision clearance triangles at street intersections and where driveways and curb cuts intersect with streets. Z" 18) Location and size of new or existing loading spaces and docks. 2" 19) Location and size of proposed or existing signs. - -0'20) Location, type and description of required screening. ..-21) Location and size of required site drainage facilities including on -site retention 2'22) Location and size of existing or proposed public sidewalks, that are within 200 feet and on th -e same side of the street. • $ 23) Proposed improvements located within the public right -of -way. [✓]'24) Name, address, phone number and signature of the owner or person responsible for the proposed project. - 8--25) Calculation of land use density. Note: The Planning Division or reviewing official may require the site plan to include any other information to clarify the proposal, assess its impacts, or determine compliance with the Yakima Municipal Code and other laws and regulations. Revised 9 -98 ( ( CITY OF YAKIMA: / �' Y',q ' ,, jiff 0 0 2002 i- LAND U SE APPLICA if •K ` ' '� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPME ' AiK1MA ,� j"' \ �s s , 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR �� NiNG OPW. '. � .4 f -4 YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98901 VQ!i?9 VOICE: (5 575 -6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6105 Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CERTIFICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. 3. 5' t'x tr Y j R kX , I . APPLICANT NAME S KYL-nik 6.00 N y T TUC , 2. APPLICANT ADDRESS STREET ? p g p 4100 CITY v,/coo Go 2N AND PHONE NUMBER STATE 0 1. ZIP ' 707 ( PHONE (5'o3) c? go - 040 MESSAGE ( ) 3. APPLICANT'S INTEREST CHECK ❑ OWNER 0 OWNER REPRESENTATIVE IN PROPERTY ONE CONTRACT PURCHASER ❑ OTHER 4. PROPERTY OWNER NAME (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) D d V G L A- Ft- 4 - E w D it1 5. PROPERTY OWNER'S STREET z-c.9 6 . G T N /1- v . 5 v 0_8:- 13 CITY iO r 4- 14.1 H ADDRESS AND PHONE i/lf � ZIP a PHONE (5 y) 4 S-3 - z / ? MESSAGE ( ) (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STATE 9 g -7 d ! 6. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY: *' 1 g15 - z440I9 1 4 - /8/3 - z-' C2 2 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: R - 3 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: A) I/a c9 F T H k SE t/`t JF T H All/V 5E6T. z7 T, I Ai A. t d t W M 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) ❑ Class (2) Use ❑ Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Class (3) Use ❑ Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Short Plat Exemption ® Rezone ❑ Appeal ❑ Shoreline ❑ Variance 0 Nonconforming Structure/Use ❑ Utility Easement Release ❑ Home Occupation ❑ Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner ❑ Administrative Adjustment ❑ Short Plat ❑ Other 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Vi m. "..,.,_. a 5 a" a :?` �rs' rs X ' art e ��h� F �x� 1N+ Mp'.•�,; ►.atal " •s a ` �O y e; P �: ca I e i �.;' S H , Y 45, d iii. i NW 11. I certify that the informatio on this applic. • sn and the required attachments are true and correct the best of my knowledge. i 2 OZ IG • TU • Revise. ' '8 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY Hearing Examin r. I FILE NO. 7-1-0 • DATE FEE PAID i RECEIVED BY i ,� AMOUNT RECEIPT NO. E'' �" aR N6 ,. .,.,... „,, e„• r. II Si3PPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR: , ✓i ,„ 7 . i , • • CHAPTER 15.23, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) , 1. REQUEST: II (I, we) the property owner(s) request that the following described property be rezoned: i t From 12.... . _ _ To 5 C - _ ri 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (Attach if lengthy) SSE A rfilfe Eli i 3. OWNER'S SIGIWIJREz (I, we) certify that (I, we) are the owner(s) of record of all of the above descri ' ;+ U ro.: y: j i • NOTARY PUBLIC Fr . , STATE OF WASHINGTON (0 ER(S) • IGN • URE) STATE OF WASHINGTO 1•, AMANDA CHERIE LEMON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES OCT 01, 2005 ■ , COUNTY OF 1rAICIME'i ) ,.. \ `���, •�'�"\. �•'\ �1 On this day personally appeared before me , bOt.1 1W1f) VI known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they are the owner(s) of the property requested to be rezoned, have read the application and know the contents thereof, and believe the same to be true. ,-e. • ., Q • GIVEN under my head and official seal this 3 I day of ,,1-9_2D0 j�r� � Z r U `P 4.4 i 4. FN VI ONMENTA3 S._ WI KLIST A properly completed Environmental Checklist is mandated by the Washington State ` Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for a rezone request. Checklists should be obtained from the Planning Division. 5. WRITTEN NARBATJVg thoroughly answers the following questions in as much detail as possible: A. Is the requested zoning change suitable with the property in question (subject property)? How so? e B. How is the rezone request in compliance with and/or how does the request deviate from the 1997 Yakima Urban Area [ i Comprehensive Plan as amended? C. Are there adequate public facilities, such as traffic rapacity, sewer service,potabte water, storm water and other public services and infrastructure existing on and around the subject property? Are the existing public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive use of the new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are going to be implemented to address any sliort falls in public services that may exist? D. Is the proposed zone change and associated land uses changes compatible with the existing neighboring uses? What mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as site screening,buffer.ing building design, open space traffic flow alternation, etc.? E. Is there a public need for the proposed change? 6. SUCIFIC t?ROJF T If this request is for a specific project please include the following: A. Written project description including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. B, Site Plan (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) Note: All submitted information will be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner along with your application anti will become part of the public hearing record. Clear, comprehensive and accurate detnit of the information is in the best interest of the applicant. Revised 9 -9g Rezone Application for Parcels #181327 -24019 and #181327 -24020 Part III — Required Attachments Section 5- Written Narrative: A. Is the requested zoning change suitable with the property in question (subject property)? How so? Yes. The subject property (approx. 3.16 acres) is bounded to the south by a parcel (approx. 9.63 acres) that is currently zoned SCC. B. How is the rezone request in compliance with and /or how does the request deviate From the 1997 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as amended? The request is in compliance with the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. The project promotes the development of the two parcels and an additional parcel into a supermarket. There are adequate public services at the site. The development will promote commerce, and is compatible neighboring land uses. The development will enhance the overall welfare of the community. C. Are there adequate public facilities, such as traffic capacity, sewer service, potable water, storm water and other public services and infrastructure existing on and around the subject property? Are the existing public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive use of the new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are going to be implemented to address any short falls in public services that may exist? There are public facilities on and around the subject property. With the exception of street infrastructure, the public facilities are capable of supporting the subject property. The street infrastructure will be mitigated by widening S. 42' Ave. and S. 44` Ave. adjacent to the site. A traffic signal will be installed at the corner of W. Nob Hill Blvd. and S. 44 Ave. The north and southbound approaches at the intersection of W. Nob Hill Blvd. and S. 40 Ave. will be changed to split phase operation. D. Is the proposed zone change and associated land uses changes compatible with the existing neighboring uses? What mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as screening, buffering building design, open space traffic flow alternation, etc? Yes. The larger site to the south is currently zoned SCC. Screening and buffering will be accomplished through the use of landscaping at the perimeter of the property. Traffic flow alternation will be accomplished as described above. E. Is there a public need for the proposed change? Yes. This rezone will provide for commercial development of a discount supermarket to service the public in the surrounding areas. Section 6- Specific Project Information: A. Business hours of operation, days per week, and other pertinent information related to business operations. The business will be a supermarket and will operate 24 hours a day, seven days per week. The business will employ approx. 250 total employees, with approx. 20 -50 employees per shift. Legal description of Parcels #181327 -24019 and #181327 -24020 The North 642.50 of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 north, Range 18 east W.M.; EXCEPT the North 488.125 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 30.00 feet for street AND the North 642.50 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East, W.M., EXCEPT the North 333.75 feet thereof and EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet for street. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. r ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Regional Office 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 Kennewick, WA 99336 509 - 783 -2144 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Fax: 509-7V ub om TO: Bruce Benson DATE: June 3, 2002 I PROJECT NO: 30233 -00 City of Yakima PROJECT NAME: Winco Foods 129 North Second Street RE: Rezone Application Yakima, WA 98901 WE ARE SENDING YOU as checked below: ❑ U.S. Mail ® Overnight ❑ Courier COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION 1 5/21 /02 Rezone Application 12 5/15/02 Full Size Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/15/02 11 x 17 Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/15/02 8 �/z x 11 Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/31/02 Check # 1341717 for $722 for Application Fee THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ® For approval ❑ For signature ❑ Resubmit copies for review ❑ For information /use ❑ Make changes noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution 0 As requested ❑ Revise and resubmit ❑ Return , corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: SIGNED: // Paul Anderson, Design Technician c: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly i otify us at once. mir J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. ,r ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS ^ PLANNERS NI rs ° u Regional Office 2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201 Kennewick, WA 99336 509- 783 -2144 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Fax: 5 ww - w. ub com TO: Bruce Benson DATE: June 3, 2002 (PROJECT NO: 30233 -00 City of Yakima PROJECT NAME: Winco Foods 129 North Second Street RE: Class II Application Yakima, WA 98901 WE ARE SENDING YOU as checked below: ❑ U.S. Mail ® Overnight ❑ Courier COPIES DATED . DESCRIPTION 1 5/21 /02 Class II Review Application 12 5/15/02 Full Size Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/15/02 11 x 17 Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/15/02 8' /z x 11 Preliminary Site Plan 1 5/31/02 Check # 1341716 for $281 for Application Fee THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ® For approval ❑ For signature ❑ Resubmit _ copies for review ❑ For information /use ❑ Make changes noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and resubmit ❑ Return _ corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ Prints returned after loan to us REMARKS: SIGNED: Paul Anderson, Design Technician c: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1V F A , - Corporate REal EstatE Affiliates, LAX Your WESt Coast SupErmarkEt SPECialiSt RECEIVED June 24, 2002 JUN 2 6 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Mr. Bruce Benson Senior Planner City of Yakima 129 N. Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 RE: License Agreement Dear Bruce: Thank you for your help in expediting the completion of this document. Please have the agreement signed and notarized and return a fully-executed document back to me for recording. Thanks again for your help. Sincerely, Scott L. Wippel Filed Hearing Examiner EXH # F Date File # 3 — - ii880 SW RIVEMEW Lan€ • WilsonviliE, OR 97070 • (503) 682-6718 • swipp€1@wippEl-group.com HOLLAND & HART LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW DENVER • ASPEN SUITE 1400 TELEPHONE (208) 342 -5000 BOULDER • COLORADO SPRINGS 101 SOUTH CAPITOL BOULEVARD FACSIMILE (208) 343 -8869 DENVER TECH CENTER BOISE, IDAHO 83702 -7714 BILLINGS • BOISE MAILING ADDRESS MATTHEW M. HICKS CHEYENNE• JACKSON HOLE P.O. BOX 2527 SALT LAKE CITY • SANTA FE BOISE, IDAHO 83701 -2527 mhicks @hollandhart.com WASHINGTON, D.C. June 20, 2002 UPS OVERNIGHT Mr. Scott Wippel Corporate Real Estate Affiliates, LLC 11880 S.W. Riverview Lane Wilsonville, OR 97070 Tel: (503) 682 -6718 Re: WinCo Foods, Inc. / The City of Yakima Dear Scott: Enclosed please find the License Agreement with exhibits executed by WinCo Foods, Inc. in connection with the above - referenced matter. Please present this document to the City for signing and notarization and return it to us for recording. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding the foregoing. Very truly yours, Holland & Hart LLP Matthew M. Hicks MMH /jw Enclosure cc: Paul Simmons (via facsimile (503) 982 -4908) 2955414 I.DOC /17756.0085 FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF: SPACE FOR USE OF COUNTY RECORDER WinCo Foods, Inc. 650 North Armstrong Place Boise, Idaho 83704 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Bradley J. Wiskirchen Holland & Hart LLP 101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Ste. 1400 Boise, Idaho 83702 LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into this day of June, 2002, between WINCO FOODS, INC., an Idaho corporation ( "Licensee ") and THE CITY OF YAKIMA, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Licensor "). Licensor and Licensee are referred to herein each individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS A. Licensor is the owner of that certain real property in Yakima County, Washington, which is described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full (the "Trolley Property "). B. Licensee is purchasing, and will become the fee owner of, that certain real property in Yakima County, Washington, which is described in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and, by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full (the "WinCo Property "). C. The Trolley Property is a strip of land approximately twenty -one and one - half (211/2) feet wide, located directly north of Nob Hill Boulevard, which separates the WinCo Property from Nob Hill Boulevard and, essentially, serves as the WinCo Property's Nob Hill Boulevard frontage. D. The Trolley Property was formerly part of a strip of land that was the bed for a system of trolley tracks. Licensor may, at some point in the future, elect to use the Trolley Property as part of an active transportation corridor, utility corridor, or pedestrian /bicycle pathway system. E. The Parties both desire to: (1) facilitate the public's access to the WinCo Property from Nob Hill Boulevard across the Trolley Property, which will enable Licensee to develop the WinCo Property; (2) facilitate Licensee's use of the Trolley Property for landscaping and parking, which will enable Licensee to develop the WinCo Property; and (3) facilitate Licensor's development of the Trolley Property as part of an active transportation corridor, utility corridor, or recreational pathway system (if Licensor elects to make such use of the Trolley Property in the future). As such, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Use License. Licensor hereby grants to Licensee, its successors, assigns, agents, servants, independent contractors, and invitees, a non - exclusive license, subject to the terms of this Agreement, upon, over, and across the Trolley Property for the purpose of parking, landscaping, and ingress to and egress from the WinCo Property (the "Use License "). "Ingress to" and "egress from" means that the Licensee, its successors, assigns, agents, servants, independent contractors, and invitees may (afoot or in /on vehicles) go upon, over, and across the Trolley Property. Licensee hereby acknowledges that Licensor may, at some point in the future, develop the Trolley Property as part of an active transportation corridor, utility corridor, or recreational pathway. Licensor agrees not to unreasonably interfere with Licensee's use of the Trolley Property under this Agreement; provided, however, Licensor may interfere as reasonably necessary to facilitate the development of the Trolley Property as part of a transportation corridor, utility corridor, or recreational pathway. In the event Licensor elects to develop the Trolley Property for transportation, utility corridor, or recreational pathway, Licensor may terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 5. In the event that this Agreement is terminated, Licensee shall not be required to remove its improvements, if any, to the Trolley Property or restore the Trolley Property to the condition it was in prior to this Agreement. 2. Grant of Construction and Maintenance License. Licensor hereby grants to Licensee, its successors, assigns, agents, servants, independent contractors, and invitees, a non - exclusive license, subject to the terms of this Agreement, upon, over, and across the Trolley Property for the purpose of, as applicable, constructing, installing, reconstructing, replacing, repairing, and maintaining a parking lot, a driveway, and landscaping between the WinCo Property and Nob Hill Boulevard (the "Construction and Maintenance License "). 3. Indemnification of Licensor. Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold Licensor harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, expense, or damage of any kind or character, from claims, demands, costs, judgments, or other expenses of any kind (including attorneys' fees and expenses) arising out of Licensee's use or operations on the Trolley Property. 4. Title. Licensee acknowledges that Licensor is the fee simple owner of the Trolley Property and hereby agrees never to pursue a claim of fee ownership, under a theory of adverse possession or otherwise, as to the Trolley Property, or any portion thereof. 5. Termination. This Agreement, the Use License, and the Construction and Maintenance License, shall continue in full force and effect until terminated by one of the Parties giving written notice to the other Party of its intention to terminate this Agreement, including the Use License and the Construction and Maintenance License. The aforementioned notice shall be given not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the termination. LICENSE AGREEMENT 2 6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties relating to the subject matter herein and merges all prior discussions between them. There are no representations, warranties, covenants, or undertakings other than those expressly set forth herein. No modification of or amendment to this Agreement, nor any waiver of any rights under this Agreement, shall be effective unless in writing signed by the Party to be charged. 7. Headings. Headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be used to interpret or construe its provisions. 8. Non - Assignability and Binding Effect. Neither this Agreement nor Licensee's rights and obligations hereunder are assignable or sublicenseable by Licensee, by operation of law or otherwise, without Licensor's prior written consent. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of the representatives, successors, heirs, and assigns of the Parties hereto. 9. Notices. Whenever a Party to this Agreement is required or permitted under this Agreement to provide the other Party with any notice, request, demand, consent or approval ( "Notices "), the Notices will be given in writing and will be delivered to the other Party at the address or facsimile number set forth below: (a) personally; (b) by a reputable overnight courier service; (c) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; or (d) by facsimile transmission. Either Party may change its address for Notices by written notice to the other Party delivered in the manner set forth above. Notices will be deemed to have been duly given: (i) on the date personally delivered; (ii) one (1) business day after delivery to an overnight courier service with next -day service requested; (iii) on the third (3` business day after mailing, if mailed using certified mail; or (iv) on the date sent when delivered by facsimile (so long as the sender receives electronic confirmation of receipt and a copy of the Notice is sent by one of the other means permitted hereunder on or before the next business day). IF TO LICENSEE: WinCo Foods, Inc. Attn: Chief Executive Officer 650 North Armstrong Place P.O. Box 5756 Boise, ID 83705 Telephone: (208) 377 -0110 Fax: (208) 377 -0474 And to: WinCo Foods, Inc. Attn: Vice President, Retail Development 400 S. Woodland Avenue P.O. Box 400 Woodburn, OR 97071 -0400 Telephone: (503) 982 -4995 Fax: (503) 982 -4908 LICENSE AGREEMENT 3 With a copy to: Bradley J. Wiskirchen Holland & Hart LLP U. S. Bank Plaza 101 S. Capitol Blvd., Suite 1400 P.O. Box 2527 Boise, ID 83701 Telephone: (208) 342 -5000 Fax: (208) 343 -8869 IF TO LICENSOR: City of Yakima Attn: City Manager City Hall 129 North Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 Telephone: (509) 575 -6040 Fax: (509) 576 -6335 10. Severability. If any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the rest of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated. 11. Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the state of Washington, without regard to its conflicts of laws principles. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties below have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. LICENSEE: WINCO FOODS, IN . By,/ 6.._ r r Its` r a % • LICENSOR: CITY OF YAKIMA By Its ATTEST: City Clerk LICENSE AGREEMENT 4 Exhibits: Exhibit A Trolley Property Legal Description Exhibit B WinCo Property Legal Description STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss. County of Ada. ) On this PITH day of 0 , 2002, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared GARY R. PIVA, known to me to be the Chief Financial Officer of WINCO FOODS, INC., the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation. ````tpltlt ,,,,,,,, IN 1,4011 '�K�EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal , the day ai''d eadr first alvvesvritten. p T AR Y e ° L o L� o O ° P UB . Printed Na e: YrHY C4,kJMoAJ • °. ° °• ° � Notary Public T ° ° ° °° ' P ° Residing at Bose, 2-U `'4+•. e.,..t , t� My Commission expires: 1-11-0 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) ss. County of ) On this _ day of _ , 2002, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Richard A. Zais, Jr., known to me to be the City Manager of the CITY OF YAKIMA, the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of said municipal corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Printed Name: Notary Public Residing at My Commission expires: LICENSE AGREEMENT 5 EXHIBIT A A strip of land 21.5 feet wide through over and across the South end of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18 East W.M. described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line 20 feet North from the Southeast corner of said tract; thence North along the East line thereof 21.5 feet; thence West parallel with the South subdivision line 660 feet, more or less; thence South parallel with the East line thereof 21.5 feet; thence East parallel with the subdivision line 660 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. r-- Commitment No.: 52707 EXHIBIT B The North 642.50 feet of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18, E.W.M., EXCEPT the North 488.125 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 30.00 feet for street AND The North 642.50 feet of the West Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18, E.W.M., EXCEPT the North 333.75 feet thereof and EXCEPT the West 30.00 feet thereof for street. Situated in Yakima County, State of Washington. Commitment No.: 52790 EXHIBIT B The West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 13 North, Range 18, E.W.M., EXCEPT the South 41.5 feet for public road and right of way of Yakima Valley Transportation Company, AND EXCEPT the North 642.5 feet Situated in Yalcime County, State of Washington. SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER G TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE G -1 Transportation Impact Analysis by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. May 2002 G -2 Transportation Capacity Analysis Application from Skyland Co. 6 -3 -02 G -3 City of Yakima Traffic Engineering Comments from Joan Davenport 7 -17 -02 City of Yakima Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division To: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner From: Joan Davenport, Traffic Engineer Date: July 17, 2002 Subject: DST Comments for Skyland Corporation Inc. Review I have reviewed the Kittelson & Associates Traffic Study (May, 2002) for the Proposed development of a 79,000 square foot grocery store and a 4,000 square foot retail pad, as well as the site plan prepared by J -U -B Engineering (5/15/02). Traffic Engineering staff has worked with the applicant since November, 2001 in providing data and directing the scope of this study. I offer following comments. 1. Trip Generation Rates: Total expected traffic generated by the proposed development is 930 PM Peak Hour vehicle trips, as noted on Table 3 of the Kittelson Study (page 19). The site plan prepared by J -U -B Engineering indicates Future Development Pad A at the corner of Nob Hill Boulevard and S. 42 Avenue. Although not represented as a Fast Food development, the Traffic Study, to be inclusive, modeled the impact of a fast food use at this site. The 930 PM Peak hour trips includes a fast food development. Once pass -by trips are factored, the new development is expected to add 790 PM Peak hour vehicle trips. 2. Pass -by Rates: The Kittelson study uses the rates recommended by the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, October, 1998 which estimates an average of 25 to 30 percent of pass -by trips for a grocery store. However, this pass -by rate would assume that roughly 20 percent of the existing traffic visits the store during the PM Peak hour. To be more realistic, the Kittelson study reduced the pass -by rate to 15 percent of the total for the proposed development. Total pass -by trips is estimated at 140 Pm Peak hour trips. 3. Significant Impacts: Anticipated impacts of the new development are identified and discussed within the report. The proposed development will have a significant adverse impact on two street intersections ( Nob Hill Boulevard and South 40 Avenue; as well as Nob Hill Boulevard and 44 Avenue (Page 2, Executive Summary). The development is directly adjacent to an elementary school and near the patrolled school crossing (page 13 of the study). Both 42 and 44 Avenue are local access streets with incomplete or missing frontage improvements. 4. Recommendations from the study are summarized beginning on page 27. Based upon the findings of the study and site review, Traffic Engineering recommends the following mitigation measures: Filed Hearing Examiner Traffic Engineering Comments: Skyland Co. - _ / 0� Page 1 of 2 EXH # Date • File# bZ3—a�— RECEIV 20 02 City of Yakima, Washington P L AN /Vl �, AKI'P � , TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Div The Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070) requires all new development to be consistent with the existing or planned street system capacities. The City of Yakima adopted Yakima Municipal Code Section 12.03 to implement this local requirement. The information you provide with this application will be used to estimate the impact of your development upon the PM Peak Hour traffic on the City of Yakima arterial streets. APPLICATION INFORMATION FEE: $250 (Receipt # / 9 ) _ t i 3 f & C:Li33 Applicant Name: S lc yL✓)-'fV 0 GdtM } r`1 - /JY / -1-- ry G ' 6-c -' Contact Person: JD"/ot - IA- Ai 8 v/2.77v6T Mailing Address: IQ. 2. (30,)c 400 woof)C3 () OA) OR ci707f _ Project Address: N. c9F !.f A0i3 H-IL 13Lvp' 13 �T�c=EN 5. 40,✓v Ave. -- 5. g¢TeAve. Parcel Number: zz{`0icl 0-4 �fDz8 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Number of Units Describe 5 0 Ctaptp3 z(c5 T Describe De vet- aPr+ENn Housing Type: Gross Floor Area: 79 000 F ' Gross Floor Area: (single family, Apartment, condo, MHP) Special Population: Parking Spaces: 211 ( Parking Spaces: (Assisted Living, NursingHome, etc) (Required/Provided) (Required /Provided) Other: Number of Employees LO Number of Employees (Day Care, Church, etc) . C z o -50 per 51,;F-9 Project Description: O S T IZ �(-T D r A- 7 9,000 S. F 5 c.)'- T 0 rJ .4 PpR_O,c . iz-. 7i rtcvel5 * * ** *PLEASE ATTACH A SITE PLAN * * * ** Submit this form , attachments and fee to the City Permit Center, Yakima City Hall, 129 North Second Street, Yakima, Washington, 98901. You will receive a Notice of Decision explaining the Findings of this analysis. Please review the Decision when it is sent to you, as there is a limited time period for Request for Reconsideration or Appeal. Questions? Contact the City of Yakima Public Works Traffic Division 2301 Fruitvale Boulevard, Yakima, WA 98902 .. _.._. Phone: 509/575 -6005 Filed Hearing Examiner gX11 # Date 6 - 3- Oa- FR@ 0 k2#3-&- Transportation Impact Analysis West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Yakima Washington • F . g r KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, 1 NC. � ,..;� Transportation Planning/Traffic Engineering May 2002 �r a: f Avg - 4 f` s' 44,x4 41fe' Transportation Impact Analysis West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Yakima, Washington Prepared For: 4-‘314N eG Corporate Real Estate Affiliates o f WAS ■ " 11880 Riverview Lane . A`° - c O Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 h . 11 t). (503) 682 -6718 .e. 0 . 41/ 1 ° ;' .0: -' ' , ; 4 ii r sa 38 f�"_ ,. -- L Prepared By: ;�. _.• ;; 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. t. ,„ - - t , 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 `_;, I Portland, OR 97205 _. _.._,_ (503) 228 -5230 Project Manager: Julia Kuhn Butorac, P.E. Project Principal: Mark Vandehey Project Analyst: Glenn Blackwelder Project No. 5019.0 ,,, 74ke Nvf%_ Filed Hearing Examiner May 2002 EXH # 6 ,Date YALkl a File #, 1Z-Z- It 3 " oa' May 2002 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary 2 Section 2 Introduction Section 3 Existing Conditions 9 Section 4 Transportation Impact Analysis 16 Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations '- -6 Section 6 References 19 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Appendix B Description of Level -of- Service Methods and Criteria Appendix C 2001 Existing Conditions Operations Worksheets Appendix D Crash Data Appendix E In- Process Traffic Appendix F Year 2003 Background Traffic Operations Worksheets Appendix G Year 2003 Total Traffic Operations Worksheets Appendix H Queuing Worksheets Appendix I MUTCD Signal Warrant Worksheets Kittelson & Associates, Inc. May 2002 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map 6 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan 7 Figure 3 Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices 10 Figure 4 Existing Traffic Conditions. Weekday PM Peak Hour 11 Figure 5 2003 Background Traffic Conditions. Weekday PM Peak Hour 17 Figure 6 Estimated Trip Distribution Pattern 20 Figure 7 Site - Generated Traffic Volumes. Weekday PM Peak Hour 21 Figure 8 2003 Total Traffic Conditions. Weekday PM Peak Hour 22 List of Tables Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations 9 Table 2 Crash Data 13 Table 3 Estimated Trip Generation 19 Table 4 MUTCD Signal Warrant Analysis Results 23 Table 5 With Site 95 Percentile Queues (in Feet) 24 Kitte /son & Associates, Inc. ii �^ 4 h y , , s ",,,, +., p i! i t ;F`}GaIM 1, ii *4,1, .1. 04 ,, :2„,.. 1 ,,,;40::::.,,,,,,„ tz„,......,„,,ittf: ,„, 1 ,c , , ,,,,. :: -. ; ' , 7z,,,,,,t1:::1- ,r 't` a • : : N � f C'vI'Y y y.^5�.,gir4 ikti .;,rN,tt0. ¢ # i4! .1 .1 �?T7'4!.y ..'31' ( [Ltis 6 y f' .`3 �,,e ". ;,i4 ` 4 "' F�"�"..liYdcT i:F.`�'�Xi.�af.� r �+ C CO w N (j) 0 4-J D 0 N X W May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Executive Summary Executive Summary Corporate Real Estate Affiliates is proposing to construct a 79.000 square foot supermarket and a 4,000 square foot .retail pad in Yakima, Washington. The proposed development will be located north of W Nob Hill Boulevard between S 42 Avenue and S 44 Avenue. Access to the supermarket is proposed via two accesses on S 42 Avenue, two accesses on S 44 Avenue. and a right -in, right -out access onto W Nob Hill Boulevard. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2002 with anticipated completion and operation by the year 2003. The findings of the intersection operational analysis documented in this study are summarized below. Summary of Intersection Operational Analysis Findings — Weekday PM Peak Hour Year 2003 Traffic Year 2003 Traffic Existing Traffic Without Site With Site Mitigation Intersection j LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C Required? S 40`" Avenue / W Nob Hill Boulevard D 0.82 D 0.88 E 0.96 Yes (signalized) - Mitigated � - - - - D 0.91 S 40`" Avenue / W Arlington Street B 0.14 C 0.16 C 0.17 No (unsignalized) S 42 " Avenue / W Nob Hill Boulevard D 0.17 D 0.20 F' 0.77 No (unsignalized) S 44`" Avenue / W Nob Hill Boulevard D 0.19 D 0.23 F >1.0 Yes (unsignalized) - Mitigated (Signal) - - - - C 0.65 S 44`" Avenue / W Tieton Drive A 0.36 A 0.38 A 0.45 No (signalized) *Note: Intersection LOS and V/C ratio represent operations of critical movement only for unsignalized intersections. LOS: Level of Service V /C: Volume /Capacity Ratio 1. Does not meet MUTCD Signal Warrants Based on the results of this study, the proposed uses can be developed while maintaining acceptable traffic operations at the study intersections within the site vicinity with the mitigation recommended in this report and summarized below. It should be noted the intersection of S 42 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard will operate at LOS "F" on the critical southbound left -turn movement. The critical movement may have long delays, but it has adequate capacity, low turning movement volumes, adequate queue storage, it does not warrant a traffic signal, and a parallel route is available on S 44 Avenue via a signal. The mitigation of the critical movement LOS "F" is not needed at this time. Additional details of the methodology, findings, and recommendations are provided in this report. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Executive Summary RECOMMENDATIONS • In conjunction with site development. it is recommended that the following improvements be made: :- S 42 Avenue and S 44 Avenue should be widened to current City Yakima standards for local streets along the site frontage. The existing pedestrian signal on W Nob Hill Boulevard to the west of S 44 Avenue should be removed and replaced by a traffic signal at the S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection. The north and south approaches on the S 40` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection should be changed to split phase operation. That is. the southbound movements operate in unison (left. through and right together) while the northbound movements are stopped and vice versa. Under split phase operation. the center southbound lane should be converted from a through lane to a shared through /left lane. Any landscaping and signing provided along the site frontage should be maintained • to ensure adequate sight distance at the site- access driveways. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 3 . ;,•.. ,,.....z4t,":„,-; ' 4W ''''' ''' " *l b ' ' ' ' ' • : . - , ',..s.. , . ,.. , 0, ; :f.*:”... , .., i:,. ,,,,,v 4 04.kii i•-t-3 :. 4-. ';',`,, , , , ? % A -.,' -,, • .!...A.;: '4 :Vt . V., . , Sq! ,, .,:o4 ... .., '-:, .,,::::,,,,'",::";::: _ ,. . - .,.- --.. :- 'iA•A::";- :4‘....,c.: ;. - 4 .=1 ,' ' :..il ', fr.,C1.. ":!..E--A-:-=‘, ti:1:b14 •:::: •i -:..:' . ‘.: •-•,!:,'''';'''.:--, \ 7 . _ '. $.•., ;,. - . - -4: 4-e, : , ' - ' ..• '. .- !k$ lik . ; ei • t .. tc ,• - str t ''-',••• ..':,... , tt - 1, t11 C 0 C -- 0 r ..- ..... 4-1 D 0 (1) 13 0 2 4_, c May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Introduction Introduction -PROJECT DESCRIPTION Corporate Real Estate Affiliates is proposing. to develop a 79.000 square foot supermarket and a 4.000 square foot fast food restaurant to the north of W Nob Hill Boulevard between S 42 Avenue and S 44` Avenue in the City of Yakima. The proposed project site location is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. SCOPE OF THE REPORT This analysis identifies the transportation- related impacts associated with the proposed site development and was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City of Yakima. The study intersections and overall study area for this project were selected based on a review of the surrounding roadway network. existing travel patterns. and input provided by City of Yakima staff. Operational analyses were performed at the following intersections: • S 40` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard; • S 40` Avenue/W Arlington Street: • S 42 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard: • S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard; and • S 44` Avenue/Tieton Drive. This report addresses the following transportation issues: • Existing transportation system conditions, including operational analysis of weekday p.m. peak hour traffic within the site vicinity: • Planned developments and transportation improvements in the study area: • Forecast year 2003 background traffic operations durin2 the weekday p.m. peak period: • Trip generation and distribution estimates for the proposed supermarket; • Forecast year 2003 total traffic operations with full build -out of the site during the weekday p.m. peak period: and • Conclusions and recommendations. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 5 NORTH TIETON DR (NOT TO SCALE) co •zr x x c EISENHOWER cn HIGH SCHOOL W ARLINGTON ST WILSON MIDDLE SCHOOL a > / � WHITNEY // N <n ELEMENTARY SIT SCHOOL W NOB HILL BLVD 0 0 Q cn x in cn cn W VIOLA AV SITE \ 0 so v YAKIMA COUNTY 97 1 SITE VICINITY W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE I K YAKIMA, WASHINGTON MAY 2002 5019FOO1 f: NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) F>li I 16( ) 1.___Lsyr' ._2 ■ i 1 i I I t ) SUPERMARKET -. w n z u_1 CID i- _ = = w = _ _ - _ — z — — — = w - _ — > = a ( ) t ) am I= t ) - 0 I - = - u) • = RETAIL PAD i ( )E.. (-->MR I I . = ( . . . . . = el 1 1111111111111 ± lIII 1 i WEST NOB HILL BOULEVARD SITE PLAN W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE YAKIMA, WASHINGTON K MAY 2002 5019F002B z' f y ; fi,. . ; ,'.` «�,n„�` ����^.. s< t a ;may W ,. 4M. .a '`;'• ," n,Fti ,",!f 1 �.`. #pa w } s? � s • ,e.:( s 7 e f \ 4t _,Ta 'NV M C � 0 O ._ + V D C (n O c (1) X W May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Existing Conditions Existing Conditions The existing_ conditions analysis identifies site conditions and the current operational and geometric characteristics of roadways within the study area. The site of the proposed supermarket was visited and inventoried in October 2001. At that time. information was collected regarding_ site conditions. adjacent land uses. existing_ traffic operations, and transportation facilities in the study area. SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES The approximately 12 -acre study site is located to the north of W Nob Hill Boulevard between S 42 Avenue and S 44` Avenue. The site is currently occupied by a drive -in movie theater. The theater access is located just east of S 44` Avenue and is used unofficially as a pick -up /drop off area for the nearby elementary school. While there are residential uses to the south and east of the site. educational uses are very prominent in the area. Whitney Elementary School is located directly to the west of the site. Eisenhower High School is located to the north of the site beyond a narrow band of residential uses. and Wilson Middle School is located to the north of Whitney Elementary School. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Roadway Facilities The primary roadways within the study area are maintained by the City of Yakima. The characteristics of the roadways are given in Table 1. Figure 3 illustrates the location of the study intersections formed by these roadways as well as the respective lane configurations and traffic control devices. Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations Cross Speed Side- Bicycle On- Street Roadway I Classification I Section Limit walks? Lanes? Parking? W Nob Hill Boulevard Principal Arterial 4 -5 lanes 35 mph Yes No No W Arlington Street Not Classified 2 lanes 20 mph Partial No No (Local Street) W Tieton Drive • Minor Arterial 4 -5 lanes 30 mph Yes No No S 42nd Avenue Not Classified 2 lanes 25 mph No No No (Local Street) Not Classified West side North of S 44th Avenue (Local Street) 2 lanes 25 mph only No Arlington only TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS Manual turning movement counts were obtained at the study intersections on weekdays in October 2001 and January 2002. All of the traffic counts were conducted during the weekday evening peak hour. The turning movement counts from the weekday p.m. peak hour were summarized and rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour as shown in Figure 4. Appendix "A" contains the traffic count sheets used in this study. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 9 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 44 41 TIETON DR t > ¢ > x x m ~v o EISENHOWER co cf) HIGH SCHOOL • W ARLINGTON ST • > WILSON 0 MIDDLE z SCHOOL v rn > a WHITNEY j co ELEMENTARY /SITE NOB HILL BLVD / SCHOOL W N OB LL BL > > • 0 • ¢' a v . • F (/J C!) ; • •• Q ul • Cn • _ W VIOLA AV ; • • _. 7.. '-.2 C- ''t'' v l t t'' LEGEND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS STOP SIGN AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE 1 p YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 3 �` MAY 2002 \ 5019F003 Iel NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) S 00 ` ^ u.“. i i 5 5 -, LOS =A �5 1.---tn LOS=B 520 • Del =5.7 4-- 810 Del =14.8 10-N V/C=0.36 25 •.• ................. 4j Mt VVC=0.14 V/ • l TIETON DR • 1 0 0 0 N CD C C; N D r` • > Q Q Q • H V O co v v. EISENHOWER HIGH SCHOOL • W ARLINGTON ST • > • WILSON Q 0 MIDDLE N SCHOOL NI- u) > Q WHITNEY /� `n ELEMENTARY co SITE SCHOOL / W NOB HILL BLV D > > • 9. • ¢ a • a o • <= ' > v c a • . Li" _ • • W VIOLA AV : •. • • • ot o to tno - mv u7 tf) V N N (7 �� l (/)".....---: al t 10 LOSSD 35 ` LOSSD 15 100 1 LOS =D 295 490 Del =29.7 .0- 250 525 Del =29.9 .0- 520 435 —+ D C 0481 01- 560 ∎ V/C -0.19 - V /C=0.17 75 tf7 u70 N Ntn Ntn to V N V V O CO 0 LEGEND CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS LOS = CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL EMENT L E VEL SERVICE OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CRIICAL MVE OF S (UNSIGNALIZED) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY (UNSIGNALIZED) YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 4 V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO MAY 2002 5019F004 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Existing Conditions Study Intersection Operations All level -of- service analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the - procedures stated in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 1). A description of level of service and the criteria by which it is determined is presented in Appendix 'B." Appendix "B" also indicates how level of service is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of level of service. To ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst -case scenario. the peak 15- minute flow rate during the weekday p.m. peak hour was used in the evaluation of all intersection levels of service. For this reason. the analyses reflect conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average peak hour. Traffic conditions during all other weekday hours will likely operate under better conditions than those described in this report. Signalized Intersections Level of service analyses for signalized intersections are based on the average control delay for vehicles entering the intersection. Control delay includes delays associated with acceleration, deceleration. and queue move -up time. in addition to stopped delay at the signal. The City of Yakima requires a LOS of "D or better for signalized intersections. The signalized study intersections are operating acceptably under the applicable standards as shown in Figure 4. Although operational standards are met, observations of the S 40` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection revealed southbound left -turn queuing that exceeds available left turn storage. Due to the right -of -way constraints at the intersection. a potential mitigation for this condition is to operate the traffic signal as split phase on the north and south approaches and convert the leftmost southbound through lane to a shared through /left -turn lane. The mitigation removes conflicts between through and queued left -turn traffic by operating them in unison. This mitigation may yield balanced lane utilization. Unsignalized Intersections The operational analysis methodology used in this report for unsignalized intersections focuses on the critical movement at the intersection. The critical movement is designated as the movement with the highest delay. Delay (which is the measure that determines level of service) is not the only factor that should be considered when evaluating unsignalized intersections. The volume -to- capacity ratio of the critical movement, the expected queuing of the critical movement, and signal warrants should also be considered if the level of service reaches F. In the case of low- volume approaches to an arterial street, the critical movement delay is often high (LOS "F ") while the volume -to- capacity ratio is low. queuing is not excessive. and signal warrants are not met. Signalization of an intersection that does not meet warrants due to low side street volumes typically will result in more delay to the system. In these cases it is better to impose the high delay on the low - volume critical movement rather than impose unnecessary delay on all movements. Figure 4 also summarizes the level of service and volume -to- capacity results for the three unsignalized study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. The results presented in the figure indicates that all of the unsignalized intersections are currently operating within acceptable operating thresholds during the weekday p.m. peak hour. The volume -to- capacity ratios of the Kitte /son & Associates, Inc. 1 2 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Existing Conditions critical movements were low in all cases. and field observations revealed queues of no more than two vehicles during the p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach to the S 40` Avenue/W Arlington Street intersection has signing prohibiting eastbound left turns, and temporary channelization that makes left turns difficult. However, a left turn is physically possible, and vehicles (roughly 5 per hour) do make left turns at the intersection. The channelization is a deterrent to left turns, but it has not totally eliminated them. A treatment that would eliminate eastbound left tums is some type of center median on S 40 Avenue. However. the current pavement and right -of -way width on S 40` Avenue precludes the construction of a center median. For this report, the intersection has been analyzed with the left turn volumes included. In addition. field observations indicated that the pedestrian signal located to the west of the S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection impacts operations at the intersection. When the pedestrian signal is in use. westbound queuing from the pedestrian signal blocks the S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection. Appendix "C" includes the 2001 existing conditions level -of- service worksheets. Traffic Safety In order to evaluate safety at the study intersections, crash data was obtained from the City of Yakima. The crash data were collected between January 1, 1998, and June 30, 2000. The executive summary of "Intersection Collision Analysis. 1998 - 2000" (City of Yakima, 2001) was also considered in the analysis. The data collected are summarized in Table 2. Appendix "D" includes the crash data from the Cir,' of Yakima. Table 2 Crash Data • Crash Rate Total Entering Per Rear- Approach Side- Intersection Crashes ADT MEV end I Broadside Turn swipe Other S40` "Av /W � � -- - - - -- Nob Hill Blvd 48 • 30,450 1.23 20 . 10 10 5 3 S 44`" Av / W 8 14,000 0.45 2 1 1 1 3 Nob Hill Blvd Arlington St / 17 16,800 0.79 9 1 6 0 1 S 40`" Av Tieton Dr / S 14 18,100 0.61 6 2 4 0 2 44`" Av ADT= Average Daily Traffic, MEV = Million entering vehicles The intersection of S 40` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard is listed 6` on the signalized intersection priority list in "Intersection Collision Analysis, 1998 - 2000 ". The identified left -turn queuing issue at the intersection may be a contributing factor to the crash rate at the intersection. The identified mitigation, changing intersection operations to split phase in the north -south direction and changing the leftmost through lane to a shared though /left -turn lane. has the potential to reduce the crash rate. The southbound left -turn queue currently extends into the through lanes during the weekday p.m. peak hour, which could contribute to rear -end accidents on the southbound approach to the intersection. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 13 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Existing Conditions The intersection of Arlington StreetlS 40` Avenue has been recently altered to eliminate eastbound left turns. This change could reduce the crash rate shown in Table 2 for the S 40` Avenue/W Nob - Hill Boulevard intersection. The intersection of S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard is listed in "Intersection Collision Analysis, 1998 -2000" under intersections that have more than one reported collision between a pedestrian or bicyclist and a motor vehicle. S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard experienced two collisions between vehicles and bicycles. Because of the schools in the area. the number of pedestrians and bicyclists is likely higher than the citywide average. and it is possible that the number of crashes is indicative of larger number of bicyclists. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 14 - — „ . ._. . ! Section h,-,..„,- ,„..t: Transportation Impact Analysis al,,, .. i., '.; t.R piii';''.n:` ■ t'..:4i. e•W ;,•;Nr. 'ii•';'!.. „,..,..*,:t5., 4,0. Tr 4:7 prim,v43! 1 ,, ,, ,,, , ,,,, , , -to..-.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, r , , ,,,,„ : „ Tv ,1 „,,,,,. • 4. ----.4) ''-..,:14. ;!''iw„ riff N ,,:... 4,4 E ' ' ''.4 . 1',FZISI.f.:;' , t:I.4..1...4-31:', . .• . '.,, ';'?...i ti.... 4;1 ; , ;•.; 6 •It . me ,.:;?,;.. ,,,,,;;;,.- Ai VI', , ft5i.vgil s?i: :-.J.::. -; • . •b *---, - 4 nari4iir4e t'A‘..t. -7- -.: [ - -. - -...;!.':a4 , - -, ,4 e4&iitNai tise't ''bi' • ;',....':,,,,l'.....: May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Transportation Impact Analysis Transportation Impact Analysis The transportation impact analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate after the proposed supermarket and fast food restaurant are in full operation. The impact of traffic (generated by the proposed development during a typical weekday p.m. peak hour was examined as outlined below. • Planned developments and transportation improvements in the site vicinity were identified and reviewed. • Background weekday p.m. peak hour traffic conditions for the year 2003 were analyzed. Annual growth rates derived from historical trends were applied to existing traffic volumes to account for regional growth in the site vicinity. • Future daily and evening peak hour site - generated trips were estimated for build -out of the site. • A trip distribution pattern for the site was derived through a review of the roadway network and existing traffic volumes. • Predicted site - generated traffic from the proposed development was added to the background traffic volumes to evaluate total traffic operations at the study area intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. • Off -site mitigation treatments were identified and recommended. 2003 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The background traffic analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate in 2003, the year that the proposed development is expected to be fully built -out and occupied. The background traffic analysis includes traffic growth due to development within the study area and from general growth in the region. but does not include traffic from development of the proposed development. Planned Developments and Transportation Improvements The City of Yakima identified several nearby developments that are expected to be constructed prior to the proposed development. These include a 100.000 square foot office building located on S 40 Avenue south of W Nob Hill Boulevard and a 48 -unit apartment complex located in the southwest quadrant of the S 48 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection. Traffic from approved developments, known as in- process traffic. was estimated and assigned to the study roadways as part of the background traffic conditions. There are no funded transportation improvements that were included in the background conditions analysis. Traffic Volumes Year 2003 traffic volumes were estimated by accounting for regional growth and planned developments in the area. Through conversations with City of Yakima staff, it was determined that a 1.5 percent annual growth rate should be applied to existing volumes to account for anticipated regional growth. In- process traffic was also added to account for local development. Figure 5 illustrates the resulting forecast year 2003 background traffic volumes for the weekday p.m. peak hour. Appendix "E" contains the year 2003 planned development traffic volumes derivation. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1 6 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 00 o u-, m � �� �n ./i.. �1 5 1 L OS =A �5 5 1 LOSEC 535 —► Del =5.7 4--• 835 Del =15.8 10 V/C =0.38 25 4j V;C • TIETON DR 000 N CT. CO • • > a a a = = H H H v O • CO sr Tr Tr EISENHOWER HIGH SCHOOL • • W ARLINGTON ST • > WILSON a 0 MIDDLE N SCHOOL s* u> > a WHITNEY j /� ��� co ELEMENTARY %% cn SCHOOL W NOB HILL BLVD j / / / //l OB LL BL D > > • • a a • • • o o • a ' a v- Tr • co c Li-) CD • • • _ W VIOLA AV •. • • • • u•) O u'1O N 0 010 - N V N ,- C) f') rr� l (-0 l 10 LOSSD 35 `5 1 LOSSD 15 105 LOS =D k- 305 5i 0 Del =34.6 .4- 255 555 —•• Del =34.7 f— 575 465 55 D C=0 88 AI-- 5 80 V/C =0.23 Jr V/C =0.20 or v \ 1( V \ 1r V \ t( o 0 0 0 VN V V f7Nc) Q LEGEND CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) 2003 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR CRITICAL ICAL MOVEMENT EMENT LEE OF SERVICE OF SERVICE (UNSIGNALIZED) _ Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY ( UNSIGNALIZED) YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 5 V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO MAY 2002 K 5019F005 May 2002 West Nob Hill Bou /evard Supermarket Site Transportation Impact Analysis Operational Analysis Using the forecast weekday p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes shown in Figure 5. an operational analysis was conducted at each study intersection to determine the 2003 background traffic levels of service and volume -to- capacity ratios. As indicated by the figure. the background traffic analysis determined that all of the study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably during the weekday p.m. peak hour. The queuing issues identified by observations at the S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection are expected to remain unchanged from existing conditions. Appendix "F" contains the year 2003 background operations worksheets. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Corporate Real Estate Affiliates is proposing to develop a 79.000 square foot supermarket and a 4.000 square foot retail pad. At this point potential uses for the pad have not been identified. To present a conservative analysis. it was assumed that the pad would be a fast -food restaurant. With development approval. construction of the proposed facility would begin in 2002. with full build - out of the site occurring in 2003. The site as proposed includes two driveways on S 44 Avenue. one on W Nob Hill Boulevard and two on S 42 " Avenue. The north most driveways on S 42 " Avenue and S 44` Avenue are intended for use as delivery rather than customer driveways. Proposed Transportation Improvements In conjunction with the proposed development. S 42 ❑d Avenue and S 44 Avenue will be widened along the site frontage to local street standards with sidewalks. As will be discussed later in this report. the intersection of S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard will meet signal warrants and require signalization as part of the development project. The signal will replace the existing pedestrian signal located on W Nob Hill Boulevard just to the west of S 44 Avenue. Trip Generation Estimates of daily and weekday p.m. peak hour vehicle trip ends for the proposed development were developed based on empirical observations at similar developments. These observations are summarized in the standard reference Trip Generation, 6 Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (Reference 2). The trip generation estimate also considers the effects of pass -by trips. According to The Trip Generation Handbook, also published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (Reference 3), the pass -by rate for supermarkets of this size is 25 to 30 percent. However this pass -by rate would assume that roughly 20 percent of traffic on W Nob Hill Boulevard visits the supermarket. A typical rule of thumb suggests that no more than 10 to 15 percent of site frontage traffic will stop at any given use, so the pass -by rate has been reduced to 15 percent of total site volumes to reflect 10 percent of the existing volume along the site frontage. Table 1 shows the estimated trip generation for the proposed development using ITE data. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 18 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Transportation Impact Analysis Table 3 Estimated Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips ITE Size Land Use Code (sq. tt.) Daily Trips Total In Out Grocery Store 850 79,000 8,810 815 415 400 Internal Reduction (200) (10) I (5) (5) r Grocery Store Subtotal 8,610 805 410 395 Fast Food Restaurant w/ i 834 4,000 1,985 135 70 65 Drivethrough Internal Reduction 200 (10) (5) I (5) Fast Food Restaurant Subtotal 1,785 125 65 60 Subtotal 10,395 930 I 475 455 Pass -by Reduction (15%) ! 1,560 140 70 70 pp Net New Trips 8,835 790 405 385 As shown in Table 4. the proposed uses are estimated to generate approximately 8.835 net new daily trips on an average weekday, of which approximately 790 trips (405 in/385 out) could occur during the weekday p.m. peak hour. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The distribution of site- generated trips onto the study area roadway system was determined through a review of the surrounding. roadway network. existing traffic patterns, and discussions with City staff. The resulting estimated trip distribution pattern is illustrated in Figure 6. Based on the distribution shown in Figure 6. the estimated site generated trips were assigned to the transportation system the assignment of the site trips are shown in Figure 7. 2003 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study area's transportation system will operate with the inclusion of traffic from the proposed supermarket and fast food restaurant. The year 2003 background traffic volumes for the weekday p.m. peak hour shown in Figure 5 were added to the site - generated traffic shown in Figure 7 to arrive at the total traffic volumes shown in Figure 8. Intersection Operations Figure 8 provides a summary of the forecast total traffic levels of service and volume -to- capacity ratios associated with full build -out of the proposed development. As indicated in the figure, this analysis determined that all of the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable operating standards during the weekday p.m. peak hour with the exception of the S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard (as an unsignalized intersection), S 42 " Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard and S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard (under existing phasing). Appendix "G" contains the 2003 total traffic operations worksheets. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 19 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) I s Ig if N TIETON DR > a _ = = co c o m c EISENHOWER co ` HIGH SCHOOL W ARLINGTON ST > WILSON o MIDDLE z SCHOOL v cn > WHITNEY j / / // ELEMENTARY /SITE SCHOOL W NOB HILL BLVD _ cc z 15% > = 35/0 CO CO I c cn o c o W VIOLA AV ig ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE 1 YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 6+ 1 1< MAY 2002 V 5019F006 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 0 1 15 s or 40 ..... 0 o TIETON DR o • • > > > a 2 y F - O er I- EISENHOWER v ' HIGH SCHOOL u- W ARLINGTON ST WILSON a a 0 c 10 MIDDLE N cn • 1 SCHOOL .,, cn cn • , WHITNEY • /M • • • - ELEMENTARY . • • /�IT SCHOOL .- W NOB HILL BLVD • / / / / /l� • a o� > z • I L 50 cn • • v in •. cn • • 255 30 • • .� W VI OLA AV t o \ •. Li" Lo m i!l c (-----?-' 0 0 - / N \- N J C f a i f 135 -" 5 k- 190 30 60 40 -5 —0.- 90 225 —40 -10 195 —40 165 135 —0 r 145 40-N 0 c 'NOTE: NEGATIVE NUMBERS REFLECT PASS -BY TRIPS SITE- GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE YAKIMA, WASHINGTON K MAY 2002 5019F007 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 7 /" ."---- 00 O n I li i t 5 1 LOS =A �5 5 (T5 LOS=C 535 --∎ Del =7.7 4—. 835 Del =16.7 25 mil v/C =0.45 65 • ...... • 45 V/C 0. t ; v o0 • TIETON DR • - • c� _ 0 m > > > a • _ _ = r 1- • c EISENHOWER co co In HIGH SCHOOL u o CV CM =WBLT W ARLINGTON ST •' • C M = LOS =A WILSON a > LOS =A Del =9.5 10 MIDDLE a 5 Dei =8.4 .01 V /C -0.O t SCHOOL v vvfc=0 t ( 11 • rn WHITNEY Al/ N /// ELEMENTARY . ' ' • • SCHOOL • . SI W NOB HILL BLVD / / / // • • a • • o > ' ¢ Z o • <=1"'" N 1 C =WB 1` v 1 vJ CM =EBRT LOS =B 50 LOS =A • Del =14.7 Del = • V/C=0.48 I � 255 30 VR /C *0.03 • • • • t #0!.: W VIOLA AV : 1 I in0 mN .7 V U'f c O 1.---R' (00 O � Q InN V , •- f")f`•) l .� �l� a ll • 145 LOS=F 45 LOSND 190 30 LOS=F 75 140 LOS =E 305 515 —41. 4— 815 780 —... 775 750 —0. f— 940 600 --* Del =56.2 41- 730 10 Al V / C = > 5 0 /� 25 <5 C=0 01 i <5 <5 /C=0 7 � • 5 95 v /C =f0.96 80 1 1 ( I( I P LnLn0 In In in inLn 000 V N V V V V ^ Q LEGEND CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (UNSIGNALIZED) 2003 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED)/ CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR (UNSIGNALIZED) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/ W NOB HILL BLVD SUPERMARKET FIGURE 1 CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY (UNSIGNALIZED) YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Q 1 1< V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME -TO- CAPACITY RATIO MAY 2002 _ v 5019F008 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Transportation Impact Analysis Under stop control. the critical southbound left -turn movement at the S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection is expected to operate at LOS "F" and over capacity with build -out of the - proposed supermarket and fast food restaurant. The intersection meets volume based MUTCD signal warrants as summarized in Table 4. Signalization of this intersection is part of the proposed development. After signalization of the intersection, it is expected to operate at LOS "C" with a volume -to- capacity ratio of 0.65. Appendix "1' contains the 2003 total traffic operations worksheets. Table 4 MUTCD Signal Warrant Analysis Results Intersection MUTCD Warrant #1 MUTCD Warrant #2 MUTCD Warrant #11 S 42 " AviW Nob Hill Blvd No No No +; S44th Av/W Nob Hill Blvd Yes Yes Yes The critical southbound left -turn movement at the S 42 " Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection is expected to operate at LOS "F" with build -out of the proposed development. The demand for the movement is not expected to exceed capacity and the intersection does not meet signal warrants. Therefore no mitigation is recommended at this time. The 95 percentile southbound queue was found to require 100 feet of storage. There is over 300 feet of storage available on S 42 Avenue between the nearest proposed site driveway and the intersection. Without mitigation. the identified queuing problems at S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection are expected to continue and the intersection is expected to operate at LOS "E ". During, the weekday p.m. peak hour the southbound left turn queue exceeds the available queue storage. To mitigation this condition, the signal could be converted from standard eight -phase operation to split phase operation in the north /south direction. Split phase operation would allow the conversion of the middle lane of the southbound approach from a through lane to a shared left/through lane. As a result. left turn queues will not block moving through and right -turn traffic. Also, the additional left turn lane adds to the available left -turn storage. The proposed mitigation also decreases the volume - to- capacity ratio of the intersection from 0.96 to 0.91 and reduces the delay at the intersection to LOS "D ". Queuing at the intersection is summarized in Table 5 below. See Appendix "H" for queuing worksheets. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 23 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Transportation Impact Analysis Table 5 With Site 95 Percentile Queues (in Feet) I . Scenario Lane(s) I Northbound I Southbound Eastbound I Westbound S 40` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard P. Without Left 200 350 200 125 Mitigation Through /Right 275 j 225 275 375 Left 200 300 200 125 Mitigation Shared Left/Through - 300 - - Through /Right 275 300 275 375 S 42n Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard With Existing Left 25 25 25 100 Control Through /Right - - S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard With Signal Left 50 1 250 200 75 Through /Right 75 175 j 300 On -site Circulation As part of this study, internal circulation was evaluated to ensure that the site provides sufficient on- site circulation for pedestrian movements and internal site traffic. Kittelson & Associates. Inc. worked with the project's development team to enhance the operational and safety aspects of the proposed site - access driveways and on -site circulation. Through this analysis. the proposed site plan has been refined to meet the needs of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The site circulation has been designed with the objective of minimizing the site traffic ingress via S 44 Avenue in order to minimize impacts to Whitney Elementary School. The signs and landscaping in front of the site will be designed to encourage use of the right -in. right -out driveway on W Nob Hill Boulevard. This should be particularly effective on traffic inbound to the site from the east. Exiting traffic will likely rely heavily on S 44 Avenue because of the proposed signal on W Nob Hill Boulevard. A fence will be provided along the west side of the site to discourage pedestrian crossing of S 44 Avenue except at designated crosswalks. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 24 Section 5 y k � Conclus and }# .:..,. t" '1 '� yam Recommendations �' . � , S �� A ' �L x4, +r �'.a� (� ��, :, vv r F 3ia'iC , mss. h akRs W '�.. Sn�N x s IS' - 4.' 4 . IV) r.,1 ' Ing, pr.% 5 � '� 'ta ?.� .7i'+ u �' .t ,,,,,ge , nrd. • 4.044,,......:$ ,„s,,,,,,:.k....„.„..., :,. May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the results of the transportation impact analysis, the proposed 79.000 square foot supermarket and 4.000 square feet fast food restaurant can be developed while maintaining acceptable operations and safety on the surrounding_ transportation system with the mitigation recommended in this report. The findings and recommendations of the transportation impact analysis are outlined below. FINDINGS Existing Conditions • During the weekday p.m. peak hour, all of the study area intersections operate within acceptable operating thresholds. • Southbound left -turn queue lengths at the S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection exceed the available storage. Year 2003 Background Traffic Conditions • Year 2003 background conditions (without development of the proposed supermarket) were estimated assuming continued regional growth and the inclusion of traffic from in- process developments in the site vicinity. Operational analyses indicate that all of the study intersections will continue to operate within acceptable level of service standards. • It is expected that the southbound left -turn queue lengths at S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard will continue to exceed the available queue storage length. Proposed Development Activities • Based on ITE data. the proposed supermarket and fast -food restaurant area is estimated to generate 8.835 net new daily trips. Of these trips. approximately 790 trips (405 in, 385 out) are expected to occur during the weekday p.m. peak hour. • In conjunction with site development, S 42 Avenue and S 44` Avenue will be reconstructed to City of Yakima standards for local access streets. • Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on S 42 Avenue. two driveways on S 44 Avenue and a right -in. right -out driveway on W Nob Hill Boulevard. • To accommodate movement in and out the site and school - related pedestrian movements, the pedestrian signal located on W Nob Hill Boulevard west of the S 44` Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection will be removed and replaced by a traffic signal at the S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection. Year 2003 Total Traffic Conditions: • Under forecast year 2003 total traffic conditions, all of the study intersections are forecast to be within operating standards during the weekday p.m. peak hour with the exception of the S 42 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard and S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersections. • The critical southbound left turn movement at the intersection of S 42 " Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard is expected to operate at LOS "F ". Demand for the movement does not exceed Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 26 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Conclusions and Recommendations capacity and the intersection does not meet signal warrants. Queuing at the intersection does not impact traffic operations. Therefore. mitigation is not recommended at this time. • The critical southbound movement of the S 44 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection is expected to operate at LOS "F" with a volume -to- capacity ratio in excess of one. Signalization of the intersection is expected as part of the proposed development. Installation of a traffic signal allows the intersection to operate at LOS "C" and a volume -to- capacity ratio of 0.65. • At the S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection. southbound left -turn queues are expected to exceed the available storage and the intersection is expected to operate at LOS "E ". Modifications to the signal are recommended to better accommodate queues. These modifications that will also cause the signal to operate at LOS "D" at a lower volume to capacity ratio. RECOMMENDATIONS • In conjunction with site development. it is recommended that the following improvements be made: • S 42 Avenue and S 44` Avenue should be widened to current City of Yakima standards for local streets along the site frontage. • The existing pedestrian signal on W Nob Hill Boulevard to the west of S 44 Avenue should be removed and replaced by a traffic signal at the S 44 Avenue intersection. • The north /south approaches on the S 40 Avenue/W Nob Hill Boulevard intersection should be changed to split phase operation and the center southbound lane should be converted from a through lane to a shared through /left lane. • Any landscaping and signing provided along the site frontage should be maintained to ensure adequate sight distance at the site - access driveways. • Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 27 • p;41 t ift KIRO „ 6,04p1‘,:pd ?, , V(.V2g) k`f- 6A-iVaLl'j 1 ,117Fa: A., A 404 9AN f4tAii*y.x„ -:* " 1 ati.e4fIgiftgiik 1 6 1 1. qiit.t We ' j 4216 a) •_ c 4■ o a) a) (I) cc May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site References References 1. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 2000. 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition. 1997. 3. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook. 1998. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 29 n-`' App endix A 4 _� x ; _ ;3 . ; F ; . ; ru ;. » .:. te 1:17 ' Traff Count Data t ` . � " . a ye ; � � r ,., c� . , , g k � „ V,is,a��; a� " "� �� TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET Project Name: Yakima WinCo • - Site Location: Nob Hill Blvd KITTELSON 9 ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 5019 Address: - 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: jak : City: Yakima ' Portland, Oregon 97205 Dale: 10/15/2001 State: Washington N ., (503) 228 -5230 Filename: H \ prolllle1 50191x1s \44nobhlllcounLXLSITURNS Time Recorded: 4:00 - 5.00 pm __ _ \ Fax: (503) 273 -8169 Street' 44th Street 42nd :45 -:00 45. 00 5 1 3 I 0 5 :30 -:45 - 30 -:45 :15 - • 15- 30 . 2 ' I 0 3 :45- 00 :30 -:45 :15 -.30 .00- 15 - 1 1 10 Street, Nob Hill ,45 -:00 '30 - :15 - .00-'15 1 0 ' 5 Street' Nob Hill ft 4 NI IC 9 NI - 71 IC 71 R 4 1 2 4 10 4 6 7 0 . 0 0 l 2 o e a - N F 4 N F 127 95 115 127 127 ' 130 145 - 179 136 ' 98 122 _140 144 137 ry rm 11 W NI it 0 2 3 3 R T 71 9 5 3 7 0 0 1 0 R ?. T o a r ■ 00-'15 '15- - 30- 45 45- 00 .00 -:15 '15- 30 '30 -.45 :45 -.00 • 2 0 4 1 0 0 .15- 30 :15 -'30 0 0 6 1 0 0 30 -.45 30- 45 3 0 2 1 0 0 :45- 00 .45 00 1 0 6 0 0 0 TralPc Gaunt Instructions: 1. Fill in street names and north arrow to reflect your count perspective, draw diagram ii necessary • 2 Indicate beginning time of counts 3. Count only vehicles entering and exiting tenth driveways and indicate direction 4. Count in 15- rrttnute intervals for 2 hours City of Yakima Traffic Engineering City of Yakima File Name : 40thave &nobhill Traffic Engineering Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 10/16/2001 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted 40th Ave Nob Hill Blvd 40th Ave Nob Hill Blvd r Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time 1 Right Thru 1 Left 1 Right 1 Thru Left Right 1 Thru Left I Right i Thru l Left ! Int. Total , Factor 1 1.0 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 ! 1.0 1 1.0 ! 04:30 PM 23 60 55 68 120 14 22 70 15 8 115 27 1 597 04:45 PM 24 82 99 69 124 19 24 99 22 12 101 19 1 694 Total 47 142 1541 137 244 33 46 169 37 20 216 461 1291 05:00 PM 28 55 80 I 85 141 22 27 72 32 12 103 25 1 682 05:15 PM 38 85 111 73 174 22 34 92 37 16 117 27 826 Grand Total 113 282 345 295 559 77 107 333 106 48 436 98, 2799 Apprch % 15.3 38.1 46.6 31.7 60.0 8.3 19.6 61.0 19.4 8.2 74.9 16.8 1 Total % 4.0 10.1 12.3 I 10.5 20.0 2.8 3.8 11.9 3.8 1.7 15.6 3.5 1 40th Ave I Alli , ., : ; Illp. r PI= Ea . , a O Z Y 9 1 r. CDNorth . r / Y 40th Ave City of Yakima Traffic Engineering City of Yakima File Name : tieton44th Traffic Engineering Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 01/08/2002 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted i 44th Ave Tieton Drive I 44th Ave Tieton Drive Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time 1 Right ! Thru 1 Left 1 Right 1 Thru 1 Left : Right ! Thru 1 Left ! Right ; Thru ' Left ! Int. Total Factor ! 1.0 1 1.0 : 1.0 1 1.0 ! 1.0 1 1.0 I 1.0 1 1.0 I 1.0 1 1.0 ! 1.0 ! 1.0 : 1 04:30 PM 0 3 1: 4 195 5 13 3 1 3 1 0! 357 04:45 PM 0 2 3 1 1 187 7, 17 2 5 1 134 1 I 360 Total 0 5 4 1 5 382 12 ; 30 5 6 4 263 1 I 717 05:00 PM 5 2 1 1 0 183 8 I 15 3 5 5 128 0 1 355 05:15 PM 0 5 3 I 1 247 4 17 4 11 2 130 2 1 426 Grand Total 5 12 8 ' 6 812 24 62 12 22 11 521 3 1 1498 Apprch % 20.0 48.0 32.0 0.7 96.4 2.9 64.6 12.5 22.9 , 2.1 97.4 0.6 Total % 0.3 0.8 0.5 ! 0.4 54.2 1.6 ! 4.1 0.8 1.5 ; 0.7 34.8 0.2 j 44th Ave If 0, 00 CO) i1 IV K..._. ) , s 2 0 o C almammillik41111 m v �. CD N N h " m North 44th Ave City of Yakima Traffic Engineering City of Yakima File Name : Arling40thAve Traffic Engineering Site Code : 00000000 KB - Start Date : 01/09/2002 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted I 40th Ave Arlington 40th Ave I Arlington Southbound Westbound Northbound i Eastbound Start Time Right 1 Thru I Left I Right, Thru Left Right 1 Thru I Left 1 Right ! Thru I Left 1 Int. Total 1 Factor 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 , 1.0 1 04:30 PM 11 153 0 0 0 0 0 161 2 I 13 0 0 1 340 04:45 PM 8 155 0 0 0 0 0 209 5 1 13 0 2 1 392 Total 19 308 01 0 0 01 0 370 7 i 26 0 2 i 732 05:00 PM 24 150 0' 0 0 0 1 0 161 5 10 0 1 1 351 05:15 PM 13 191 0 0 0 0 1 0 280 9 i 9 0 1 483 Grand Total 56 649 0 0 0 0 0 791 21 I 45 0 4 1566 Apprch % 7.9 92.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 97.4 2.6 1 91.8 0.0 8.2 I Total % 3.6 41.4 0.0 j 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.5 1.3 ; 2.9 0.0 0.3 9 l ' £ 40th Ave 1 b.'�L -, ...........} , , c D c al Q m * --45--- • -... .. 1 North . 40th Ave • • Appendix B ttfel Description of Level-of-Service t, J.7 Methods and Criteria N totr,v-tz - • *". - CA:5 Vt-g4;iled,:g May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Appendix 6 Appendix B Level of Service Concept Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed by traffic engineers to gauge the overall quality of the travel experience through an intersection or roadway segment as it is perceived by the traveler. Six categories are used to denote the various levels of service, which range from A to F. i Signalized Intersections At signalized intersections. level of service is defined by a single performance measure: average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay. queue move - up time. stopped delay. and final acceleration delay. Table B1 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to signalized intersections. and Table B2 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category. LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s) are described in the body of the report. Table B1 Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle A Very low average control delay, less than 10 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and /or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a level of service A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and /or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume /capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle. This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally (but not always) indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume /capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume /capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values, even when the volume /capacity ratio is significantly below 1.0. 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, (2000). Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 81 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Appendix B Table B2 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5510 g >10 and 5.20 C >20 and 535 p >35 and 555 E >55 and 580 F >80 Unsignalized Intersections Unsianalized intersections include two -way stop - controlled (TWSC) and all -way stop- controlled (AWSC) intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual provides models for estimating average control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. Table B3 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to unsignalized intersections. and Table B4 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category. LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s) are described in the body of the report. Table B3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street Service • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation with very little time spent waiting for an A acceptable gap. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. • Some drivers begin to consider the average control delay an inconvenience, but B acceptable gaps are still very easy to find. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Average control delay becomes noticeable to most drivers, even though acceptable gaps are found on a regular basis. • It is not uncommon for an arriving driver to find a standing queue of at least one additional vehicle. • Average control delay is long enough to be an irritation to most drivers. Average D control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • Drivers find the length of the average control delay approaching intolerable levels. • Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because E there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • There may or may not be substantial excess capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. • Most drivers encountering this condition consider the length of the average control delay to be too long. F • Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • There may or may not be substantial excess capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 82 May 2002 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site Appendix B Table B4 Level of Service Criteria for unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5 51 0 g >10 and s15 C >15 and 5_25 p >25 and 5_35 E i >35 and 5_50 F >50 It should be noted that the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example. drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval. while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, the control delay threshold for any given level of service has been set to be less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for AWSC intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at TWSC intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through movements. For TWSC intersections. the overall intersection level of service remains undefined: level -of- service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of unsignalized intersections, it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOE's) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue lengths, and 95` percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only. such as delay for the minor - street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. B3 • :• 6...s7024 ;;Va,cwir •• - . . . • - • tooft- §24% P3 1 • igAry .7te. ,100.;. ••tr. f1 U) C 4-J X o wen 4-i 't) Q. 0 a 0 0 CU) (/) 0 W 1 O a 0„ , 0 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:42 Page 1 -1 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:43 Page 2 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Level Of Service Computation Report Scenario: expm 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* ** * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** * **** ** Command: expm Intersection #1 42nd Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Volume: expm ************************************************* * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** Geometry: existing Average Delay (sec /veh): 29.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: D Impact Fee: null Trip Generation: null Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Trip Distribution: null Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Paths: null Routes: null Control: a 11 11 11 e Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Configuration: expm Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 11 11 1 Volume Module: 11 Base Vol: 5 1 1 20 1 5 1 525 1 5 720 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 1 1 20 1 5 1 525 1 5 720 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 6 1 1 23 1 6 1 603 1 6 828 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 6 1 1 23 1 6 1 603 1 6 828 17 Critical Gap'Module: 11 11 11 e Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx e 11 11 11 I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1032 1463 302 1152 1455 422 845 xxxx xxxxx 605 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 187 128 694 153 129 580 787 xxxx xxxxx 969 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 183 127 694 150 128 580 787 xxxx xxxxx 969 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: ee ee ee e Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 191 xxxxx xxxx 174 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 24.7 xxxxx xxxxx 29.9 xxxxx 9.6 xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * C * * D * A * * A * * ApproachDel: 24.7 29.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C D * * Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 5019EXPN.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:01p Page 1 of 3 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14 :50:43 Page 3-1 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:43 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #2 44th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Intersection #8 40th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Average Delay (sec /veh): 29.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: D Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.815 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 44.2 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ; Optimal Cycle: 97 Level Of Service: D Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 11 11 11 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include 1 11 11 11 1 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: 11 11 11 1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 5 1 20 15 5 10 10 490 10 25 670 35 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 Initial Bse: 5 1 20 15 5 10 10 490 10 25 670 35 Volume Module: User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base Vol: 105 335 105 345 280 115 100 435 50 75 560 295 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 6 1 23 17 6 12 12 570 12 29 779 41 Initial Bse: 105 335 105 345 280 115 100 435 50 75 560 295 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 6 1 23 17 6 12 12 570 12 29 779 41 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 117 372 117 383 311 128 111 483 56 83 622 328 Critical Gap lModule: 11 11 11 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx ! Reduced Vol: 117 372 117 383 311 128 111 483 56 83 622 328 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: 11 11 11 1 Final Vol.: 117 372 117 383 311 128 111 483 56 83 622 328 Cnflict Vol: 1049 1477 291 1166 1462 410 820 xxxx xxxxx 581 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 182 125 706 149 128 591 805 xxxx xxxxx 989 xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Move Cap.: 166 120 706 138 122 591 805 xxxx xxxxx 989 xxxx xxxxx Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 11 11 11 1 Adjustment: 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.88 0.88 Level Of Service Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 1.42 0.58 1.00 1.79 0.21 1.00 1.31 0.69 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1769 2597 814 1769 2397 985 1769 3125 359 1769 2197 1157 LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * I 11 11 11 1 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Capacity Analysis Module: Shared Cap.: xxxx 389 xxxxx xxxx 180 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx j Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.28 0.28 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 15.0 xxxxx xxxxx 29.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Shared LOS: * C * * D * * * * * * * Green /Cycle: 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.35 0.35 ApproachDel: 15.0 29.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx Volume /Cap: 0.44 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.44 0.44 0.81 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.81 0.81 ApproachLOS: C D * * Delay /Veh: 47.7 56.0 56.0 51.8 34.8 34.8 84.6 32.6 32.6 53.1 40.2 40.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 47.7 56.0 56.0 51.8 34.8 34.8 84.6 32.6 32.6 53.1 40.2 40.2 ' DesignOueue: 7 21 7 20 15 6 7 23 3 5 29 15 ' Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. ' S 1 , 5019EXPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:01p Page 2 of 3 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:43 Page 5 -1 expm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:43 Page 6 -1 i Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 • West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima Washington Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #19 44th / Tieton Intersection #21 40th / Arlington ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.364 Average Delay (sec /veh): 14.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 5.7 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ' Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 1 11 11 11 e Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Control: I Permitted 11 Permitted 11 Permitted 11 Permitted I Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include 1 11 11 11 1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Base Vol: 20 790 0 0 650 55 5 0 45 0 0 0 1 11 11 11 I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 20 790 0 0 650 55 5 0 45 0 0 0 Base Vol: 20 10 60 10 10 5 5 520 10 25 810 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Initial Bse: 20 10 60 10 10 5 5 520 10 25 810 5 PHF Volume: 25 975 0 0 802 68 6 0 56 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF PHF Volume: 0.28 0.88 0.8 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.8 0.88 0.88 0 0.88 Final Vol.: 25 975 0 0 802 68 6 0 56 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical GaplModule: 11 11 11 e Reduced Vol: 23 11 68 11 11 6 6 591 11 28 920 6 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 e Final Vol.: 23 11 68 11 11 6 11 6 591 11 28 920 6 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 870 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1373 xxxx 435 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ' Saturation Flow Module: Potent Cap.: 770 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 137 xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Move Cap.: 770 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 133 xxxx 569 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adjustment: 0.80 0.80 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.86 1 11 11 11 1 Lanes: 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.02 1.94 0.04 0.06 1.93 0.01 Levet Of Service Module: Final Sat.: 1013 506 1583 649 649 325 31 3250 63 97 3156 19 Stopped Del: 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 11 11 1 LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Capacity Analysis Module: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.29 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 429 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx j Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Shrd StpDel: 9.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Green /Cycle: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Shared LOS: A * * * * * * B * * * * Volume /Cap: 0.19 0.19 0.36 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.36 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 14.8 xxxxxx Delay /Veh: 40.3 40.3 41.8 39.9 39.9 39.9 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.9 2.9 2.9 ! ApproachLOS: * * B User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 40.3 40.3 41.8 39.9 39.9 39.9 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.9 2.9 2.9 DesignQueue: 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 11 0 , ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 5019EXPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:O1p Page 3 of 3 i' s t 3 ,' - :°:]i f.,: f141.1. i.. ,44, 1 4,: ..1 ' ,, .i ;I -.4' . i ,, t k. x,74' � : ' y•.. v.x t "7 #,gyp , bs CI CO x cO 0 a ai 4 0 e Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/0111998 - 12/31/2000 40th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd Sorted by <DATE;TLME;ACC#> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 01/23/1998 21:55 Sideswipe OD No Injury Disabling Injury 0 04/14/1998 14:45 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 04/14/1998 19:30 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 06/04/1998 6:05 Broadside No Injury No injury 0 06/06/1998 23:00 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 07/14/1998' 11:15 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 08/19/1998 15:35 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 11/19/1998 3:10 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 12/11/1998 20:55 Sideswipe SD No Injury No Injury 0 01/08/1999 16:30 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 01/26/1999 17:30 Sideswipe SD No Injury No Injury 0 02/21/1999 :40 Fixed Object Non Disabling No Injury 0 02/22/1999 5:35 Broadside No Injury Possible Injury 0 03/20/1999 13:15 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 0 03/24/1999 14:30 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 03/31/1999 15:15 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 05/27/1999 18:10 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 05/27/1999 7:50 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 06/02/1999 14:45 Approach Turn No Injury Possible Injury 0 07/01/1999 18:00 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 07/14/1999 6:05 Broadside Non Disabling No Injury 0 08/02/1999 17:00 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 08/27/1999 19:40 Other Type of Non Disabling Non Disabling 0 08/30/1999 18:05 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 09/14/1999 17:00 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 11/08/1999 8:05 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 11/24/1999 7:40 Broadside Possible Injury No Injury 0 01/20/2000 17:00 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 02/03/2000 15:10 Sideswipe SD No Injury No Injury 0 05/15/2000 17:25 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 06/06/2000 12:10 Rear End Possible Injury Possible Injury 0 06/13/2000 14:20 Approach Turn No Injury Non Disabling 0 07/10/2000 13:15 Other Type of No Injury Non Disabling 0 07/14/2000 15:30 Rear End Possible Injury Possible Injury 0 07/24/2000 15:40 Approach Turn No Injury Unknown 0 08/05/2000 15:00 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 08/28/2000 16:45 Rear End No Injury No Injury 1 09/22/2000 10:15 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 09/26/2000 7:41 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 11/21/2000 11:50 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 11/30/2000 8:45 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 12/08/2000 15:50 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 12/30/2000 13:55 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 IA Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/01/2001 - 06/28/2001 40th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 01/26/2001 12:10 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 05/12/2001 21:10 Approach Turn Non Disabling No Injury 05/31/2001 14:40 Rear End No Injury Possible injury 0 06/18/2001 17:25 Sideswipe SD No injury No Injury 0 06/23/2001 16:43 Rear End No Injury No Injury 3 Page: 1 C Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 44th Ave & Tieton Dr Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 03/20/1998 15:10 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 0 02/18/1999 14:40 Rear End Possible Injury Possible Injury 0 12/09/1999 8:00 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 01/12/2000 12:05 Broadside No Injury Non Disabling 0 02/24/2000 15:05 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 1 03/23/2000 12:55 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 03/27/2000 22:40 Other Type of No Injury Disabling Injury 0 04/05/2000 17:25 Approach Turn No Injury No injury 0 09/22/2000 7:10 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 10/10/2000 12:30 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 1 11/09/2000 12:15 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listino 01/01/2001 - 06/28/2001 44th Ave & Tieton Dr Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 01/10/2001 23:35 Fixed Object No Injury 0 01/30/2001 14:40 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 0 04/25/2001 14:55 Rear End Possible Injury Possible Injury 0 Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 44th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACCt> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 02/18/1998 6:20 Other Type of Possible Injury No Injury 0 02/27/1998 16:00 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 03/10/1998 13:45 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 09/11/1998 18:32 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 05/22/1999 15:20 Sideswipe OD No Injury No Injury 0 09/13/1999 18:05 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 09/27/1999 11:20 Approach Turn No Injury Non Disabling 0 04/01/2000 17:30 Other Type of No Injury 0 Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 12/31/2000 40th Ave & Arlington St Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 01/05/1998 12:00 Head On No Injury Possible Injury 0 02/18/1998 12:30 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 04/16/1998 7:30 Approach Turn No Injury Non Disabling 0 06/04/1998 17:20 Rear End Possible injury No Injury 0 10/03/1998 10:30 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 10/09/1998 21:45 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 0 03/02/1999 14:55 Broadside No Injury No Injury 0 07/13/1999 18:00 Rear End Possible Injury No Injury 0 12/20/1999 11:30 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 04/17/2000 17:20 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 06/19/2000 17:05 Rear End Possible Injury Possible Injury 0 08/15/2000 15:25 Approach Turn Possible Injury No Injury 0 09/08/2000 21:55 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 09/15/2000 12:24 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 09/21/2000 20:30 Approach Turn No Injury No Injury 0 11/04/2000 10:40 Rear End No Injury No Injury 0 Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 11/28/2001 Accident listing 01/01/2001 - 06/28/2001 40th Ave & Arlington St Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL VEH 1 INJ CL VEH 2 INJ CL PASS IN 03/19/2001 15:15 Rear End No Injury Possible Injury 0 Page: 1 ( t e- ` 1JJ o- � J 0 / • lf` ;r..\.._,tt , �_ 1 T u, ,. --- t h�'n°` V \ \,,../ l �/`� — •! k Vet) �t _ \6,_(, V ( ''' ' r , o� Zity of Yakima 12/04/2001 2301 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima, ;ashirgton 98902 Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 06/30/2001 40th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd 48 Total Accidents /\ •,,, ` /(1) cJ� 0\1, . co N DATE TIME TYPE OF COLL INT OR NON DIR FROM DISTT+NC VEt 1 DIR F VEH 1 DIR T VEI( 2 DIR F VEH 2 DIR T CONTRIB 1 CIR , ..4 - 1 ° co rn 01/23/1998 21:55 Sideswipe OD Non Inters North 0 South North North South Exceed Reas Safe S t ,° 04/14/1998 14:45 Approach Turn Non Inters North 5000 North East South North Did Not Grant ROW 2 04/14/1998 19:30 Broadside Non Inters South 96 West North North South Did Not Grant ROW ci 06/04/1998 6:05 Broadside Intersecti 0 West East South North Did Not Grant ROW k >c, 06/06/1998 23 :00 Rear End Non Inters West 25 West East West Other Cir 5 L " 07/14/1998 11:15 Approach Turn Intersecti North 157 East South West North None G 08/19/1998 15:35 Rear End Non Inters North 25 South North South Inattention '1- 11/19/1998 3:10 Broadside Non Inters North 0 South West North South Did Not Grant ROW 4 12/11/1998 20:55 Sideswipe SD Non Inters West 116 West Northeast ;lest East Inattention 9 01/08/1999 16:30 Broadside Non Inters North 171 West North South North Did Not Grant ROW to 01/26/1999 17 :30 Sideswipe SD Non Inters North 183 West North South North Did Not Grant ROW ut 02/21/1999 :40 Fixed Object Non Inters East 0 East West East Under Infl of Alc iz cn 02/22/1999 5:35 Broadside Intersecti 0 West East South North Did Not Grant ROW t3 Y 03/20/1999 13:15 Rear End West 83 West East West Under Infl of Alc 14 3 03/24/1999 14:30 Approach Turn Non Inters North 419 North East South North Did Not Grant ROW tS c> 03/31/1999 15:15 Rear End Non Inters North 320 South North South Follow too Close 1 Ce m 05/27/1999 18:10 Rear End Non Inters East 175 East West East Follow too Close 11 E 05/27/1999 7:50 Approach Turn Non Inters North 382 South West North South Did Not Grant ROW l = 06/02/1999 14:45 Approach Turn Non Inters North 273 South West North South Did Not Grant ROW 11 07/01/1999 18:00 Rear End Non Inters East 20 East West East Inattention z o • 07/14/1999 6:05 Broadside Intersecti 0 East West South North Other Cir 21 N 08/02/1999 17:00 Rear End Non Inters East 186 East West East Inattention 1.02.- 0 u, 08/27/1999 19:40 Other Type of Non Inters East 14 North East North East Improp Turn ZS 08/30/1999 18:05 Rear End Intersecti East 36 East West East Inattention 2- O 09/14/1999 17:00 Rear End Non Inters East 288 East West East Inattention 25 N 11/08/1999 8:05 Approach Turn Non Inters North 375 South West North South Did Not Grant ROW Z(, c 11 /24/1999 7:40 Broadside Non Inters North 389 North East South North Did Not Grant ROW Z1- ? .01/20/2000 17:00 Rear End Non Inters West 42 East West East Inattention 24 co 0 02/03/2000 15:10 Sideswipe SD Non Inters East 46 South East Net Inattention 29 Page: 1 cn 05/15/2000 17 :25 Broadside Non Inters East 132 North East East West Did Not Grant ROW 1-b ° 06/06/2000 12:10 Rear End Non Inters South 119 South South Northeas: Other Cir 3' 0 06/13/2000 14:20 Approach Tarn Non Inters North 525 North East South North Did Not Grant ROW 11 07/10/2000 13:15 Other Type of Intersecti 0 North West West East Did Not Grant ROW 33 07/14/2000 15:30 Rear End Non Inters East 55 East West East Inattention '34 07/24/2000 15:40 Approach Turn Non Inters East 260 West North East ;West Did Not Grant ROW 3S 08/05/2000 15:00 3roadside Intersecti 0 North South East West Disreg Stop and Go 3(e 08/28/2000 16:45 Rear End Non Inters East 63 East West East Exceed Reas Safe S 31- 09/22/2000 10 :15 Broadside Non Inters West 120 North East East .West Did Not Grant ROW 3 5! w 09/26/2000 7:41 Rear End West 83 West East Net East Inattention 11 CO 11/21/2000 11:50 Rear End Non Inters North 72 North South North South Follow too Close b co L'' 11/30/2000 8:45 Rear End Non Inters 314 South North South Other Cir 41 rn 12/08/2000 15:50 Rear End Non Inters North 436 North South North Inattention H'1 ° 12/30/2000 13:55 Rear End Non Inters East 286 East West Inattention 0 01/26/2001 12:10 Approach Turn Non Inters South 214 East Southwest West Inattention 4 4 05/12/2001 21:10 Approach Turn Intersecti North 9 East South West East Did Not Grant 8041 4 5 a 05/31/2001 14 :40 Rear End Non Inters East 176 East West East 'inattention y C( L ` 06/18/2001 17 :25 Sideswipe SD Non Inters North 320 South East South North Other Cir ` 11- 06/23/2001 16:43 Rear End Non Inters West 33 East West East Follow too Close `I6 u x 0 0 o Ea a L7 CV CV C.) LU F- O 0 CV V 0 U Ltl 0 ?age: 2 Executive Summary Intersection Collision Analysis, 1998 -2000 Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division, City of Yakima Washington May 22, 2001 Summary The purpose of this report is to identify locations which raise to our attention safety improvement consideration. Prioritization of .safety improvements can occur once the correct measures arc determined. Locations identified with possible safety concerns should be analyzed to determine appropriate remedial measures. Each location is unique and requires site - specific review. Reporting methodologies link all collisions to the closest intersection. Therefore, each field report must be read carefully to determine if the collision was actually related to a condition which exists at the intersection, or more related to a roadway condition. There are no public safety preventative measures for collisions which occur because of driver error. The City of Yakima Traffic Engineering Division has compiled three full years (1998 — 2000) of vehicle collision statistics from Police Accident Field Reports. A three year history of vehicle collisions is a requirement of most State and Federal road improvement grant programs and a standard timeline to evaluate safety issues. Un- signalized Intersection Priority List A number of intersections have been identified for further safety review because they have a higher rate of collisions based upon the number of vehicles which drive through intersection. The rate of collisions are determined based upon the number of accidents per million vehicles entering the intersection (MEV). Causes for the collisions can be varied. The most appropriate safety remedy is not necessarily the installation of a traffic signal. In some cases, improved signing, better vision clearance at the intersection or installation of stop signs are more appropriate. Each of the following locations should be reviewed. Un- signalized Intersections Priority Tots! Enter. Rate per Rear- Rrnd- Ap- Std - Listed on NVithin for Safely Review Acdd. ADT MEV End side proach swipe 6 -YR CBI) 'turn TIP? Signal Project? / 6th St & 13 St 26 9,800 2.42 1 . :17 :. 3 2 N N 2 6th St & Pacific 21 10,200 1.88 1 18 0 0 N N 3 8th St & Lincoln 20 10,400 1.76 1 10 6 2 N N 4 8th St & 13 St 27 14,300 1.72 0 21 . 2 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 12/13/2001 0 : Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 06/30/2001 40th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC4> DATE TIME PED 1 US PED 2 US PED 1 ACT PED 2 ACT PEDALCYCLE PEDALCYCLE TYPE OF COL 01/23/1998 21:55 Sideswipe 0 co 04/14/1998 14:45 Approach Tu 04/14/1998 19:30 Broadside Er; 06/04/1998 6:05 Broadside co 06/06/1998 23:00 Rear End 07/14/1998 11:15 Approach Tu ° 08/19/1998 15:35 Rear End 11/19/1998 3:10 Broadside �-. 12/11/1998 20:55 Sideswipe S 01/08/1999 16:30 Broadside 01/26/1999 17:30 Sideswipe S 02/21/1999 :40 Fixed Objec 02/22/1999 5:35 Broadside 03/20/1999 13:15 Rear End 03/24/1999 14:30 Approach Tu 03/31/1999 15:15 Rear End 05/27/1999 18:10 Rear End ° 05/27/1999 7:50 Approach Tu • 06/02/1999 14:45 Approach Tu :=1 07/01/1999 18:00 Rear End c A 07/14/1999 6:05 Broadside • 08/02/1999 17:00 Rear End °- 08/27/1999 19:40 Other Type ▪ 08/30/1999 18:05 Rear End • 09/14/1999 17:00 Rear End 11/08/1999 8:05 Approach Tu 11/24/1999 7 :40 Broadside 01/20/2000 17:00 Rear End 0 02/03/2000 15:10 Sideswipe S 05/15/2000 17:25 Broadside 06/06/2000 12:10 Rear End c> ° Page: 1 06/13/200014:20 y Approach Tu 07/10/200013:15 Side ;talk Riding agai Other Type 0 0 15 ; 30 - Rea x E:id - -- 07/24/200015:40 r Approach Tu 08/05/2000 15:00 Broadside 08/28/200016:45 Rear end 09/22/2000 10:15 Broadside 09/26/2000 7 :41 Rear End 11/21/200011:50 Rear End 11/30/2000 8:45 Rear End 12/08/200015:50 Rear End cO 12/30/200013:55 "' Rear End 01/26/200112:10 Approach Tu 05/12/2001 21:10 Approach Tu 05/31/200114:40 Rear End 06/18/200117 :25 Sideswipe S 36/23/2001 16:43 Rear End r_.L. U) U _ .-t co D. O F-' O 0 N U Lil Pap: 2 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 12/13/2001 O Accident listing 01/01/1998 - 06/30/2001 44th Ave & Tieton Dr Sorted by <DATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE. TIME PED 1 US PED 2 US PED 1 ACT PED 2 ACT PEDALCYCLF, PEDAL,CYCLE TYPE OF COL 03/20/1998 15:10 Rear End • 02/18/1999 14:40 Rear End 0 12/09/1999 8:00 Approach Tu 01/12/2000 12:05 Broadside O 02/24/2000 15:05 Approach Tu "' 03/23/2000 12:55 Approach Tu O 03/27/2000 22:40 Roadway Riding with Other Type x 04/05/2000 17:25 Approach Tu ▪ 09/22/2000 7:10 Broadside 10/10/2000 12:30 Rear End 11/09/2000 12:15 Rear End 01/10/2001 23:35 Fixed Objec 01/30/2001 14:40 Rear End 04/25/2001 14:55 Rear End CID U _ CO O a_ t1. M O N U W Page: 1 Intersection Magic VER 6.600 city of yakima,wa 12/13/2001 U) Accident listing ° 01/01/1998 - 06/30/2001 44th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd Sorted by cDATE;TIME;ACC #> DATE TIME PED 1 US PED 2 US PED 1 ACT PED 2 ACT PEDALCYCLE PEDALCYCLE TYPE OF COL 02/18/1998 6:20 Roadway Other Type CO m 02/27/1998 16:00 Broadside 03/10/1998 13:45 Rear End LO r- 09/11/1998 18:32 Rear End 0 05/22/1999 15:20 Sideswipe 0 "' 09/13/1999 18:05 Rear End 0 09/27/1999 11:20 Approach Tu 04/01/2000 17:30 Marked X Xing diagon Other Type cam. U) U J c0 0 co E- F O N co U tL1 Page: 1 Signalized Intersection Priority List A number of street intersections with existing traffic signals had high rates of collisions • compared to the volume of entering traffic. Causes for collisions at signalized intersections include high vehicle speeds, heavy traffic volumes, the presence of pedestrians, turning movements at the intersection, driveway traffic and signal phasing or timing issues. The following list of locations should be examined for possible safety improvements. Eight of these locations are scheduled to be upgraded as part of the (funded) CI3D Signal Enhancement project, scheduled to begin in late 2001. Signalized Intersections Priority Total 11 Enter. Rate per Rear- Broad- Ap- Side - Listed on Within • for Safety Review Accid. A D'r KIEV End side proach swipe 6 - CBI) Turn TIP? Signal Project? / 18th St & Nob Itill 64 25,350 2.31 ''.34:.; 11 7 .8 N N 2 Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 .21'; :18 0 1 N Y 3 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 „36: , 11 6 7: N N 4 56th Ave & Summitview 42 25,800 1.49 .;.17 k 12 6 3 N N 5 1st St & Nob Hill 62 39,950 1.42 `38 :: 5 5 8. " N N 6 40th Ave & Nob I Iill 43 30,450 1.29 18' . 10; 8' . . 4 N N 7 5th Ave & Walnut 25 18,850 1.21 2 .:',.9'- 6 3 N V R 24th Ave & Nob Hill 42 31,900 1.20 .' :: : ;9.: •10' 4 N N 9 1st St & Lincoln 36 28,400 1.16 4 ':,il5 :: 7 . 6 N 1' 10 1st St & D 26 21,200 1.12 7 'x;.15.•'. 2 1 N Y 1 / 3rd Ave & Nob Ihill 51 41,700 1.12 ;l,5'i,, .' , 3 ' : 8 N N / 1St St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 15(; 1 6 7. ; . N N /3 40th Ave & Sumitvicw 45 39,850 1.03 ',J1.,,, - ;;15 :'10 . 8 N N / 1st St & Arlington St 21 18,600 1.03 . 14` 1 1 3 N N /5 3rd Ave & Washington 34 _ 30,850 1.01 8 8 11 - 4 N N / 5th Ave & Lincoln 29 26,400 1.00 ' ' 9.i: 7: 7 5 N N /7 16th Ave & Washington 30 27,500 1.00 4 7 - 10 2 N N 18 Front St & Walnut 21 19,700 0.97 6 ,10', , 3 0 N Y / 3rd St & Yakima Ave 24 22,650 0.97 9 ; 2 3 8' N V 20 6th Ave & Yakima 21 20,500 0.94 ,12.• 3 3 0 N Y 2/ 1st & 1 St 29 28,400 0.93 '12., 5 4 3 N N 22 1st St & Yakima Ave 33 33,600 0.90 .19.:.; 3 1 5 N 1' 13 Fair Ave & Nob Hill 27 27,550 0.90 " 11 6 4 3 Y N City of Yakima Washington Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Intersection Collision Analysis, 19982000 Vehicle collision information is reported to the City of Yakima Public Works Traffic Engineering Division via Police Accident Field Reports. These police reports include a broad range of data which is useful in determining appropriate safety improvcmentslnd identifying possible locations which may merit closer review. This report will provide information about City of Yakima intersections and related collision data. Police Accident Field Reports correlate all collisions to the closest intersection forthe purpose of data aggregation. The collisions reported by the Police Accident Field Reports represent only about 40% oldie safety problems in the area. The `hear misses "or less severe collisions which are not reported to the police are not reflected inthese statistics . City of Yakima Police Department reports that total vehicle collisions have declined in recent years. Police Department statistics are displayed on Table 1 (below) which includes both field reports as well as citizen reports. Table 1: City of Yakima Police Department Collision Statistics Summary City of Yakima Vehicle Collisions 1998 1999 2000 'Total Collisions (Police Estimate) 3,613 3,402 3,133 Police Accident Field Reports 1,789 1,729 1,688 Total Injuries Resulting from Collisions 1,071 1,012 833 Number of collisions which had at least one injury 721 670 583 Fatal Injuries from Collisions 5 4 2 The fifteen highest volume street intersections are listed below, with total collisions and Average Daily traffic volumes (ADT). Total ntmber of reported collisions are listed for the last three years. Table 2: Intersections ranked by Highest Average Daily Trafilc Volumes (ADT) Location 1998 -2000 Enter. Rate per 1998 1999 2000 Total ft ADT MEV Total 'total Total Collisions Coll. Coll. Coll. I 16th Ave & Nob 1101 38 43,850 0.79 17 14 7 2 3rd Ave & Nob (till 51 41,700 1.12 18 18 15 3 1st SI & Nob Hill 62 39,950 1.42 23 23 16 4 40th Ave & Sumitvicw 45 39,850 1.03 13 21 11 5 16th Ave & Tieton 28 39,075 0.65 14 8 6 6 16th Ave & Lincoln 29 36,900 0.72 7 11 1 1 11 1.., C♦ 0. 111....1.:....,.... L 14 C4I1 1 47 10 i 70 71 Collisions by Location 'three years of collision data have been complcd to produce a listing of the 75 intersections with the highest number of reported collisions ('fable 3, below). It may he noted that six of the top ten intersections arc located along Nob 11111 Boulevard, which is a heavily traveled arterial street. However, a comparison between Table 2 (Intersections ranked by ADT) and Table 3 (Intersections with Highest Incident of Collisions) demonstrates that the number of collisions are not simply a function of the volume of traffic passing through an intersectionOthcr factors need to be evaluated to determine possible causes and preventative measures for collisions. Table 3: Intersections with Highest Incident of Collisions, 1998 -2000 Location 1998 -2000 Enter. Rate per 1998 1999 2000 Total 8 ADT MEV Total Total 'total Collisions Coll. Coll. Coll. 1 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 18 28 21 2 18th St & Nob 11111 64 25,350 2.31 22 26 16 3 1st St & Nob 11i11 62 39,950 1.42 23 23 16 4 3rd Ave & Nob Ilill 51 41,700 1.12 18 18 15 5 40th Ave & Summitview 45 39,850 1.03 13 21 11 6 Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 15 11 18 7 40th Ave & Nob 11111 43 30,450 1.29 9 18 16 8 24th Ave & Nob Hill 42 31,900 1.20 17 7 18 9 56th Ave & Summitview 42 25,800 1.49 14 14 14 10 16th Ave & Nob Hill 38 43,850 0.79 17 14 7 11 1st St & Lincoln 36 28,400 1.16 18 10 8 12 1st St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 11 9 15 13 3rd Ave & Washington 34 30,850 1.01 14 9 11 14 40th Ave & Tieton Dr 33 36,000 0.84 10 10 13 15 1st St & Yakima Ave 33 33,600 0.90 15 8 10 16 16th Ave & Englewood /Cherry 33 22,875 1.32 14 13 6 17 16th Ave & Washington 30 27,500 1.00 11 10 9 18 16th Ave & Lincoln 29 36,900 0.72 7 11 11 - 19 5th Ave & Yakirna 29 32,250 0.82 13 9 7 20 1st & 1St 29 28,400 0.93 10 10 9 21 5th Ave & Lincoln 29 26,400 1.00 11 6 12 22 1st St & Ranch Rite Rd 29 20,200 1.31 9 12 8 23 16th Ave & Tielon 28 39,075 0.65 14 8 6 24 Fair Ave & Nob Hill 27 27,550 0.90 10 10 7 25 16th Ave Rt. R iver 27 17.90(1 1.78 11 R R Location 1998 -2000 Enter. Rate per 1998 1999 2000 Total tt ADT MEV Total Total Total Collisions Coll. Coll. Coll. 34 5th Ave & D St 23 13,600 1.54 12 8 3 35 1 -82 Off Ramp & Nob hill 21 29,800 0.64 9 9 3 36 3rd Ave & Mead Ave 21 22,700 0.84 9 7 5 _ 37 Gth Ave & Yakima 21 20,500 0.94 I 7 5 9 38 Front St & Walnut 21 19,700 0.97 8 4 9 39 1st St & Arlington St 21 18,600 1.03 9 8 4 40 Custer Ave & Lincoln Ave 21 16,400 1.17 5 8 8 41 6th SI & Pacific 21 10,200 1.88 3 8 10 42 40th Ave & Fruitvale Blvd 20 31,900 0.57 4 5 11 43 1st St & Walnut 20 31,050 0.59 8 5 7 44 Rth St & Yakima Ave 20 27,400 0.67 5 7 8 45 5th Ave & 13 St 20 23,100 0.79 6 11 3 46 6th St & Nob 11111 Blvd 20 22,850 0.80 6 7 7 47 48th Ave & Ticton Dr 20 21,700 0.84 11 3 6 48 8th St & Lincoln 20 10,400 1.76 6 6 8 49 1 -82 Off Ramp & Yakima Ave 19 34,700 0.50 7 8 4 50 40th Ave & Lincoln 19 34,375 0.50 4 4 11 51 3rd Ave & Walnut 19 26,250 0.66 8 5 _ 6 _ 52 24th Ave & Lincoln 19 15,350 1.13 10 6 3 53 16th Ave & Surnrnitvicw 18 35,100 0.47 9 7 2 54 40th Ave & Englewood 18 30,100 0.55 8 3 7 55 1st St & 13 St 18 28,300 0.58 6 5 7 56 4th Ave & Yakima Ave 18 19,600 0.84 4 6 8 57 24th Ave & Ticton 17 18,300 ' 0.85 6 8 3 58 6th Ave & Lincoln 17 17,900 0.87 7 4 6 . 59 Front St & Lincoln 17 14,400 1.08 5 7 5 60 6th St & Lincoln Ave 17 10,650 1.46 3 7 7 61 Fair Ave Loop & Yakirna Ave 16 27,800 0.53 7 4 5 62 40th Ave & Kern 16 26,350 0.55 6 2 8 63 6th St & Yakima 16 25,000 0.58 6 6 4 64 16th Ave & Chestnut 16 23,200 0.63 8 5 3 65 40th Ave & Chestnut 16 22,900 0.64 7 5 4 66 2nd SI & Yakima Ave 16 22,300 0.66 4 4 8 67 Naches Ave & Yakima 16 21,100 0.69 7 1 2 7 68 16th Ave & Mead 16 18,425 0.79 7 4 5 ' 69 40th Ave & Arlington 16 18,300 0.80 6 3 7 70 20th Ave & Lincoln 16 15.350 0.95 7 4 5 Collision Rates In order to compare the rate of collisions at different locations, the number of collisions per one million entering vehicles (MEV) is calculated. Statistically, any location which i s over 1.0 collisions per MEV should be reviewed. The MEV is a measure of relative traffic volumes. The intersection of 6th Street and B Street takes 102 days to carry one million vehicles, while the intersection of I8" Street and Nob !fill Boulevard reaches one million vehicles every 39 days. Table 4: Intersections by llighest_Collistons per Million Entering Vehicles (MEV) Location Total it Enter. Rate Signal? Rear- Broad- Approach Side- (lead- Fixed Other Accid. ADT per End side Turn swipe On Object MEV 1 6th St & B St 26 9,800 2.42 N 1 17 3 2 0 0 3 2 18th St & Nob Hill 64 25,350 2.31 Y 34 11 7 8 1 0 3 3 Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 Y 21 18 0 1 1 I 2 4 611, St & Pacific 21 10,200 1.88 N 1 18 0 0 0 0 2 5 8th St & Lincoln 20 10,400 1.76 N 1 10 6 2 0 0 1 6 8th St & B St 27 14,300 1.72 N 0 21 2 1 1 1 I 1 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 Y 36 11 6 7 0 1 6 s 5th Ave & D St 23 13,600 1.54 N 2 15 4 0 0 1 I 9 56th Ave & Summitvicw 42 25,800 1.49 Y 17 12 6 3 0 1 3 / 6th St & Lincoln Ave 17 10,650 1.46 N 1 10 3 2 0 0 1 // 1st St & Nob 11111 62 39,950 1.42 Y 38 5 5 8 0 3 3 / 16th Ave & River 27 17,900 1.38 N 8 5 7 3 0 3 1 13 16th Ave & 33 22,875 1.32 N 12 6 10 0 0 1 3 Englewood/Cherry 14 1st St & Ranch Rite Rd 29 20,200 1.31 N 14 _ 8 3 1 0 1 2 15 40th Ave & Nob 1011 43 30,450 1.29 Y 18 10 8 4 0 1 2 / 5th Ave & Walnut 25 18,850 1.21 Y 2 9 6 3 2 0 3 17 24th Ave & Nob Hill 42 31,900 1.20 Y 15 9 10 4 2 0 2 13 Custer Ave & Lincoln Ave 21 16,400 1.17 N 4 5 8 0 2 0 2 / 1st St & Lincoln 36 28,400 1.16 Y 4 15 7 6 1 1 2 20 24th Ave & Lincoln 19 15,350 1.13 N 1 10 6 1 0 1 0 1 / 1st St & D 26 21,200 1.12 Y 7 15 2 1 0 0 1 11 3rd Ave & Nob 1i11 51 41,700 1.12 Y 15 16 3 8 0 1 8 13 Front SI & Lincoln 17 14,400 1.08 N 6 4 2 4 0 0 1 24 1st St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 Y 15 1 6 7 0 1 5 25 40th Ave & Sumitview 45 39,850 1.03 Y 11 15 10 8 0 0 1 16 1st St & Arlington St 21 18,600 1.03 Y 14 1 1 3 1 1 0 Location Total 6 Enter. Rate Signal? Rear- Broad- Approach Side- Head. Fixed Other Acrid. AD'I' per End side Turn swipe On Object MEV 36 Fair Ave & Nob 1011 27 27,550 0.90 Y I I 6 4 3 1 _ 0 __ - 2 _ 37 6th Ave & Lincoln 17 17,900 0.87 N 2 9 0 2 0 3 1 38 24th Ave & Tieton 17 18,300 0.85 N 3 9 2 2 0 1 0 39 3rd Ave & Mead Ave 21 22,700 0.84 Y 2 5 10 3 0 0 1 40 48th Ave & Tieton Dr 20 21,700 0.84 Y 12 I 1 1 0 1 3 0 41 4th Ave & Yakima Ave 18 19,600 0.84 Y 9 3 3 2 0 (1 1 41 40th Ave & Tieton Dr 33 36,000 0.84 Y 13 7 2 4 1 2 4 43 10th Ave & Nob 11111 Blvd 23 25,450 0.83 Y 4 11 5 1 0 0 2 44 5th Ave & Yakima 29 32,250 0.82 Y 5 11 7 5 0 1 0 45 6th St & Nob Hill 131vd 20 22,850 0.80 N 4 10 3 2 0 0 1 46 40th Ave & Arlington 16 18,300 0.80 N 8 1 6 0 I 0 0 47 16th Ave & Mead 16 18,425 0.79 N 4 3 8 1 0 0 0 4,Y 16th Ave & Nob 11111 38 43,850 0.79 Y 24 5 0 2 1 2 4 49 5th Ave & B St 20 23,100 0.79 Y 1 12 4 1 1 0 0 50 12th Ave & Tieton Dr 15 17,800 0.77 N I 5 8 0 0 1 0 51 16th Ave & Fruitvale 26 31,200 0.76 Y 6 7 2 7 0 0 4 52 17th St & Yakima Ave 24 30,000 0.73 Y 14 2 5 2 0 0 1 53 1 I th Ave & Tieton Dr 14 17,800 0.72 Y 2 4 6 1 0 1 0 54 16th Ave & Lincoln 29 36,900 0.72 Y 16 4 2 3 0 1 3 55 3rd Ave & Lincoln 14 18,000 0.71 Y 1 7 1 5 0 0 0 56 Nachos Ave & Yakima 16 21,100 0.69 Y 6 2 2 3 1 0 2 57 8th St & Yakima Ave 20 27,400 0.67 Y I 4 5 10 0 0 (1 58 3rd Ave & Walnut 19 26,250 0.66 Y 2 8 4 5 0 0 0 59 2nd St & Yakima Ave 16 22,300 0.66 Y 6 2 3 3 0 1 I 60 16th Ave & Tieton 28 39,075 0.65 Y 12 7 I 5 0 1 2 61 I -82 Off Ramp & Nob 11111 , 21 29,800 0.64 Y 11 5 4 1 0 0 0 61 40th Ave & Chestnut 16 22,900 0.64 N 2 9 4 0 0 1 0 63 16th Ave & Chestnut 16 23,200 0.63 N 4 4 5 0 1 2 0 64 1st St & Walnut 20 31,050 0.59 Y 13 4 2 0 0 0 1 65 6th St & Yakima 16 25,000 0.58 Y 4 6 2 2 0 0 2 66 1st St & B St 18 28,300 0.58 Y 4 4 4 2 1 I 2 67 40th Ave & Fruitvale Blvd 20 31,900 0.57 Y I I 0 4 2 0 1 I 65 16th Ave & Bonnie Doone 15 24,250 0.56 N 11 0 1 1 0 2 0 69 40th Ave & Kern 16 26,350 0.55 N 10 1 2 2 0 0 1 70 40th Ave & Englewood 18 30,100 0.55 Y 10 I 6 0 0 0 1 71 Fair Ave Loop & Yakima 16 27,800 0.53 N 10 3 1 I 0 I 0 Ave 72 26th Ave & Nob Hill Blvd 14 25,300 0.51 N 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 73 40th Ave & Lincoln 19 34,375 0.50 Y 0 8 7 1 0 3 0 7 4 , 1-82 OITRamp & Yakima 19 34,700 0.50 Y 10 7 1 1 0 0 0 Accident Severity Rates Accident severity methods identify and rank locations based on the distribution of accident severity. 'The US Department of Transportation and the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators commonly classify accidents into general classes, depending upon the extent of injuries. A common method to compare locations is to establish a value of vehicle accidents relative to Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO). Additional weight (rate of 9.5) is given to a very severe accident in which a fatality occurred or a disabling injury occurred. More moderate weight (rate of 3.5) is given to less severe accidents with non- disabling injuries. No additional weighting is given to accidents which are characterized by property damage only. The EPDO method has been used with regularity by State and Federal agencies since approximately 1991. The formula used is as follows: EPDO - ( it of Fatal /Disabling Injuries x 9.5 ) + (11 of Non - disabling or Possible Injuries x 3.5) .I PDO Accidents Table 5: Locations Ranked by Severity, using Equivalent Prorerty Damage Only (EPDO) Method Location 1998 -2000 Enter. Rate Fatal or Non - Property Equivalent Total N ADT per Disabling Disahl. or Damage Property Collisions MEV Injuries Possible Only Damage injury Accident Only 1 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 3 31 39 176 2 1st St & Nob 11111 62 39,950 1.42 2 33 38 172.5 3 18th St & Nob Hill 64 25,350 2.31 0 27 42 136.5 4 3rd Ave & Nob Hill 51 41,700 1.12 0 27 27 121.5 5 3rd Ave & Washington 34 30,850 1.01 3 20 18 116.5 6 56th Ave & Summitview 42 25,800 1.49 I 22 24 110.5 7 1st St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 2 21 15 107.5 8 24th Ave & Nob Hill 42 31,900 1.20 0 23 24 104.5 9 Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 0 19 31 97.5 10 16th Ave & Lincoln 29 36,900 0.72 0 24 11 95 11401h Ave & Nob Hill 43 30,450 1.29 1 16 29 94.5 12 17th St & Yakima Ave 24 30,000 0.73 1 21 8 91 1 3 16th Ave & Nob H i l l 38 43,850 0.79 0 I R 25 88 . 14 16th Ave & Washington 30 27,500 1.00 3 11 20 87 15 40th Ave & Sumitview 45 39,850 1.03 1 12 33 84.5 16 16th Ave & Englewood/Cherry 33 22,875 1.32 1 15 20 82 17 40th Ave & Ticton Dr 33 36,000 0.84 0 18 18 81 18 16th Ave & Tieton 28 39,075 0.65 0 19 14 130.5 19 1st St & Yakima Ave 33 33,600 0.90 0 14 22 71 20 16th Ave & River 27 17,900 1.38 1 12 16 67.5 21 Custer Ave & Lincoln Ave 21 16,400 1.17 0 17 8 67.5 Location , Enter. Rate Fatal or Non - Property quivalent Total 8 ADT per Disabling Disahl. or Damage Property Collisions MEV Injuries Possible Only Damage injury Accident Only 31 Front St & Walnut 21 19,700 0.97 2 R 15 62 32 5th Ave & 13 St 20 23,100 0.79 2 9 11 61.5 33 3rd Ave & Walnut 19 26,250 0.66 0 15 8 60.5 34 1st St & D 26 21,200 1.12 (1 12 17 59 35 Fair Ave & Nob Hill 27 27,550 0.90 1 9 18 59 36 3rd Ave & Mead Ave 21 22,700 0.84 0 12 13 55 37 Gth Ave & Lincoln 17 17,900 1 0.87 2 7 11 54.5 38 1st St & Ranch Rite Rd 29 20,200 1.31 0 10 19 54 39 1st St & Lincoln 36 ' 28,400 1.16 0 7 29 53.5 40 48th Ave & Tieton Dr 20 21,700 0.84 0 12 11 53 41 5th Ave & D St 23 13,600 1.54 0 I 1 13 51.5 42 3rd St & Yakima Ave 24 22,650 0.97 0 11 13 51.5 43 1 -82 Off Ramp & Nob 11111 21 29,800 0.64 1 8 14 51.5 44 40th Ave & Englewood 18 30,100 0.55 I 9 10 51 45 Gth St & II St 26 9,800 2.42 0 9 18 49.5 46 6th St & Yakima 16 25,000 0.58 0 12 7 49 47 16th Ave & Summitview 18 35,100 0.47 0 11 9 47.5 48 8th St & Yakima Ave 20 27,400 0.67 0 10 12 47 49 Gth St & Lincoln Ave 17 10,650 1.46 0 1 1 8 46.5 50 1st St & Arlington St 21 18,600 1.03 1 6 16 46.5 51 24th Ave & Tieton 17 18,300 0.85 0 11 8 46.5 52 3rd Ave & Lincoln 14 18,000 0.71 2 5 9 45.5 53 40th Ave & Chestnut 16 22,900 0.64 0 11 7 45.5 54 4th Ave & Yakima Ave 18 19,600 0.84 0 10 10 45 55 16th Ave & Bonnie Doone 15 24,250 0.56 0 11 6 44.5 56 blades Ave & Yakima 16 21,100 0.69 0 10 9 44 57 Front St & Lincoln 17 14,400 1.08 1 7 9 43 58 6th Ave & Yakima 21 20,500 0.94 0 8 14 42 59 40th Ave & Fruitvale Blvd 20 31,900 0.57 1 5 15 42 60 40th Ave & Kern 16 26,350 0.55 0 9 10 41.5 61 8th St & Lincoln 20 10,400 1.76 0 7 16 40.5 62 40th Ave & Lincoln 19 34,375 0.50 0 7 14 38.5 63 6th SI & Nob hill Blvd 20 22,850 - 0.80 0 7 13 37.5 64 40th Ave & Arlington 16 18,300 0.80 0 8 9 37 65 1st St & B St 18 28,300 0.58 0 7 12 36.5 66 20th Ave & Lincoln 16 15,350 0.95 0 8 R 36 Rear End Collisions Rear End collisions are the most frequent type of reported accidents, often with many contributing factors. Streets with no left turn pockets arc often characterized by rear end collisions as vehicles stop in traffic to make a turn. Likewise, pedestrians crossing at an intersection may he undetected by drivers who are not stopped at the crosswalk. The drivers behind the initial stopped vehicle may begin advancing their vehicle before the first car in the queue has moved, thereby causing a rear end collision. Other factors of rear end collisions include poor visibility of stop signs, vehicle speeds to fast, or large volumes of turning movements. Table 6: Intersections with Highest Rear End Collision Rates _ Location 'Total 8 Enter. Rate per Rcar- Accid. ADT MEV End 1st St & Nob Hill 62 39,950 1.42 38 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 36 18th St & Nob Hill 64 25,350 2.31 34 16th Ave& Nob Hill 38 43,850 0.79 24 Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 21 _ 1st St & Yakima Ave 33 33,600 0.90 19 40th Ave & Nob 11111 43 30,450 1.29 18 56th Ave & Summitview 42 25,800 1.49 17 16th Ave & Lincoln 29 36,900 0.72 16 24th Ave & Nob Hill 42 31,900 1.20 15 3rd Ave & Nob Hill 51 41,700 1.12 15 1st St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 15 1st St & Ranch Rite ltd 29 20,200 1.31 14 1st St & Arlington St 21 18,600 1.03 14 17111 St & Yakima Ave 24 30,000 0.73 14 401h Ave & Tieton Dr 33 36,000 0.84 13 1st St & Walnut 20 31,050 0.59 13 16th Ave & 33 22,875 1.32 12 Englewood/Cherry 6th Ave & Yakima 21 20,500 0.94 12 . 1st & 1St 29 28,400 0.93 12 48th Ave & Tieton Dr 20 21,700 0.84 12 I bth Ave & Tieton 28 39,075 0.65 12 Of those intersections listed above only two of the locations are un- signalized intersections: First Street and Ranch Rite Road; and l6'" Avenue and Englewood. These two locations should he Broadside Collisions at Signalized Intersections Right —angle collisions at signalized intersections can be attributed to a number of causes and there are also several possible safety enhancements. In collecting this data, there is sometimes a cross -over in the reporting of broadside collisions with approach turns. I f a vehicle involved in a collision is attempting to make a turn through the intersection, it will be considered as an approach turn. Causes Safety Enhancements Poor visibility of signals Install warning devices Install visors Install back Plates Reduce speed limit on approaches Remove sight obstructions Add additional signal head Install 12 inch lenses Improve location of signal heads Install overhead signals Inadequate signal timing Adjust amber phase Provide ail -red clearance phases Add Multi -dial controller Install signal actuation Rctime signal Provide progression through a set of locations Table 7:Signalized Intersections with Highest Broadside Collision Rates Location "total aI N Enter. Rate per Broad -side Accid. ADT MEV Front St & Yakima Ave 44 19,650 2.04 18 3rd Ave & Nob I Till 51 41,700 1.12 16 Ist St & Lincoln 36 28,400 1.16 15 1st St & D 26 21,200 1.12 15 40th Ave & Sumitview 45 39,850 1.03 15 56th Ave & Summitvicw 42 25,800 1.49 12 5th Ave & B St 20 23,100 0.79 12 18th St & Nob Hill 64 25,350 2.31 11 1st St & Washington , 67 36,550 1.67 11 Broadside Collisions at Un- sienalized Intersections Right angle collisions at un- signalized intersections have some different characteristics than those collisions at signalized locations. Possible causes and safety remedies are listed below. The intersections identified below will also be examined for approach turn conflicts. Data collection in 199R-99 may not have adequately classified the approach turns from right angle collisions. Future data collection will separate all broadside collisions from those which involve turning movements. Possible Cause Safety Enhancement Restricted sight distance Remove obstructions Install stop or yield signs Restrict parking near corners Reduce speed limits Install/ improve street lighting Install signal Channelize intersection Large total intersection volumes Install signal Iligh approach speed Reduce speed limit on approach 'fable 8: Un- signalized Intersections with Blest Broadside Collision Rates Location 'Total # Enter. Rate per Broad -side Accid. ADT MEV 8th St & 13 St 27 14,300 1.72 21 6th St & Pacific 21 10,200 1.88 18 _ ■th St & 13 St 26 9,800 2.42 17 5th Ave & D St 23 13,600 1.54 15 8th St & Lincoln 20 10,400 1.76 10 61h St & Lincoln Ave 17 10,650 1.46 10 24th Ave & Lincoln 19 15,350 1.13 10 • Intersections by Sideswipe or Ilead -On Collisions Vehicular accidents from sideswipe or head -on collisions have similar possible cruses and safety enhancements as noted below. Possible Cause Safety Enhancements Inadequate road design /maintenance Repair road surface Improve alignment or grade Provide wider travel lane Sign, mark, improve passing arca Inadequate shoulders Improve shoulders Excessive vehicle speeds Reduce speed limit Inadequate pavement parking Install /improve centerlines, lanclines and edge lines Install rcllectorized markers Inadequate signing Provide advance direction and warning signs Add illuminated name signs 'Table 9: Intersections with Highest Sideswipe or Head -On Collisions Location r Total # Enter. Rate per Sidc -swipe Ilead -On Accid. ADT MEV 8th St & Yakima Ave 20 27,400 0.67 10 0 18th St & Nob 11111 64 25,350 2.31 8 1 1st St & Nob Hill 62 39,950 1.42 8 0 3rd Ave & Nob llill 51 41,700 1.12 8 0 40th Ave & Summitview 45 39,850 1.03 8 0 3rd St & Yakima Ave 24 22,650 0.97 8 0 1st St & Washington 67 36,550 1.67 7 0 1st St & Mead 35 30,700 1.04 7 0 16th Ave & Fruitvale 26 31,200 0.76 7 0 1st St & Lincoln 36 28,400 1.16 6 1 5th Ave & Lincoln 29 26,400 1.00 5 0 1st St & Yakima Ave 33 33,600 0.90 5 0 5th Ave & Yakima 29 32,250 0.82 5 _ 0 3rd Ave & Lincoln 14 18,000 0.71 5 0 3rd Ave & Walnut 19 26,250 0.66 5 0 16th Ave & Tieton 28 39,075 0.65 5 0 24th Ave & Nob 1011 42 31,900 1.20 4 2 40th Ave & Tieton Dr 33 36,000 0.84 I 4 1 40th Ave & Nob 11111 43 30,450 1.29 4 0 Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions with Vehicles During the three years between 1998 and 2000, there were a total of 188 vehicle collisions which involved either a pedestrian or a bicycle. While the locations of these collisions were distributed throughout the City of Yakima, 15 intersections experienced both collisions with pedestrians and bicycles. Below is a list of locations which had more than one reported collision with a vehicle and either a pedestrian or a bicycle. Location Pedestrian Bike Totall'ed. Collision Collision or Bike Collision 1st & Washington 2 2 4 1st St & Yakima Ave 0 3 3 32nd Ave & Nob l lilt 0 2 2 16th Ave & Lincoln 0 2 2 16th Ave & Prasch 0 2 2 44th Ave & Nob 1011 0 2 2 5th Ave & Walnut 0 2 2 Gth St & Walnut 0 2 2 3rd Ave & Nob Hill 3 0 3 10th Ave & Baker St 2 0 2 1st St &BSt 2 0 2 3rd Ave & Washington 2 1 3 42nd Ave & Arlington 2 0 2 5th Ave & Nob Hill 2 0 2 6th St & Yakima Ave 2 0 2 N . 7:43 "C ;: : ... _ r_ ' Appendix E rsr;:T «.. F'.; 3. :' In- Process Traffic z , . ,, 2p �i'+�, F y�5 4 7.^..e e , P -"" .. a� a. e z`S•. fix.wSS i a . ... West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket - Kittleson & Associates, Inc. Project #5019 In- process traffic is assumed from two developments. The developments are a 48 unit apartment complex on W Nob Hill Boulevard west of 48th Avenue and a 100,000 square foot office building on 40th south of W Nob Hill Boulevard. Trip Generation - Weekday PM Peak Use Size Total In Out Office 100,000 SF 190 35 155 Appartment 48 units 45 15_ 30 It is assumed that 75% of the office development traffic is to and from the north on 40th Avenue, distributed onto W Nob Hill in the same ratio as the turning movement volumes at 40th /Nob Hill. It is assumed that 50% of the appartment traffic travels to and from the site on W Nob Hill Boulvard along the site frontage out/in 15, .J i L • 75 out/in 0' 15 0 1 1L ♦ 40th /Arlington —41.. r 0. 75 0 Added volumes from office development out/in. ` ..15; 4 1 • ::::''75 out/in out/in 0 `) i 4,. 0. out/in out/iri _ 0 4 ) i 1 0 out/in out/in 15' +0 i '► 75 out/in 20 _ 20 20. . 20 20 15 5 1 1L 1 IL 1 t.. 4 5 44th /Nob Hill 20 ♦ ♦ 5 42nd /Nob Hill 20 ♦ ♦ 40th /Nob Hill Z . r 7- r Z 5 5 -r 5 5 5'. '5 7; 5 20 75 20 20 out/in 0 4 1 • f 0 out/in out/in 0 4 1 • f 0- out/in out/in 25: 4 1 • r• 115 out/in Added volumes from apartments out/in 0' 4.1 i 4 .• 0 out/in outM, 0 +0 4- t. • 0 out/in out/in 0; 4.0 i '► ' 0 out/in 15 15 '.15 15 10 10 1 1L 1 1L 1 IL. ♦ 10 44th /Nob Hill 15 ♦ • 10 42nd /Nob Hill 15 • 4 15 40th /Nob Hill 10 z - z t - r "'10' 10 . ..10i '10 .15i ' . 1 out/in ' 0 4 '1 • g+ . 0 out/in_ouUih ' 0Y 4 1 • r• ' 0 out/in_out/in 0! 4 1 • 0 out/in • Appendix F r Year 2003 Background Traffic , { -K �. ;:k t. Operations Worksheets t rs tz PAW : r 3 � ve x' 4'•` . -, . i @ u GS�'.d 's ;�'.e`�.' g`:'.'�,.ox`�'v$eaF'a: bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 1-1 bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 2 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington ! West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour i Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Level Of Service Computation Report Scenario: bkpm 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Command: bkpm Intersection #1 42nd Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Volume: bkpm *************, r************************************, r, r,r * * * * * * * * *** ** * * * * * * ** *,r * * ** Geometry: background Average Delay (sec /veh): 34.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: D Impact Fee: null ************************************************* * * * * * * *** * * * * * * ********* * * * * * ** Trip Generation: null Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Trip Distribution: null Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Paths: null 1 11 11 11 Routes: null Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Configuration: bkpm Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 11 11 11 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 1 1 20 1 5 1 525 1 5 720 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 5 1 1 21 1 5 1 541 1 5 742 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In- process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 Initial Fut: 5 1 1 21 1 5 1 556 1 5 777 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 6 1 1 24 1 6 1 639 1 6 893 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 6 1 1 24 1 6 1 639 1 6 893 18 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx l 11 11 11 l Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1101 1564 320 1236 1556 455 910 xxxx xxxxx 640 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 167 111 676 132 112 552 744 xxxx xxxxx 940 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 162 110 676 130 111 552 744 xxxx xxxxx 940 xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II II Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 169 xxxxx xxxx 152 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 27.4 xxxxx xxxxx 34.7 xxxxx 9.8 xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * D * * D * A * * A * ApproachDel: 27.4 34.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: D D * * Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. ! S B 5019BKPM.OUT 4- 25-102 3:01p Page 1 of 3 bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 3 -1 bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 4 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report j Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #2 44th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Intersection #8 40th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Average Delay (sec /veh): 34.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: D j Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.878 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 48.5 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 119 Level Of Service: D Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** 1 11 11 11 1 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Rights: Include Include Include Include 1 11 11 11 e Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include Volume Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Base Vol: 5 1 20 15 5 10 10 490 10 25 670 35 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1 11 11 11 Initial Bse: 5 1 21 15 5 10 10 505 10 26 690 36 I Volume Module: Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Base Vol: 105 335 105 345 280 115 100 435 50 75 560 295 In- process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Fut: 5 1 21 15 5 10 10 520 10 26 725 36 Initial Bse: 108 345 108 355 288 118 103 448 52 77 577 304 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 In process: 20 75 20 0 15 0 0 15 5 5 10 0 PHF Volume: 6 1 24 18 6 12 12 604 12 30 843 42 Initial Fut: 128 420 128 355 303 118 103 463 57 82 587 304 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 6 1 24 18 6 12 12 604 12 30 843 42 ' PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Critical Gap Module: PHF Volume: 142 467 142 395 337 132 114 514 63 91 652 338 Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FoltowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 142 467 142 395 337 132 114 514 63 91 652 338 1 11 11 11 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cnflict Vol: 1119 1579 308 1251 1564 443 885 xxxx xxxxx 616 xxxx xxxxx i Final Vol.: 142 467 142 395 337 132 114 514 63 91 652 338 Potent Cap.: 162 108 688 129 111 563 760 xxxx xxxxx 960 xxxx xxxxx 1 [ 11 11 11 1 Move Cap.: 146 103 688 119 105 563 760 xxxx xxxxx 960 xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: 1 11 11 11 1 Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Level Of Service Module: Adjustment: 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.88 0.88 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.8 xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx Lanes: 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.00 1.44 0.56 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.32 0.68 LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Final Sat.: 1769 2616 798 1769 2438 952 1769 3103 379 1769 2212 1145 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 356 xxxxx xxxx 157 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Analysis Module: 11 11 11 1 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 16.1 xxxxx xxxxx 34.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.29 0.29 Shared LOS: * C * * D * * * * * * * Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** ApproachDel: 16.1 34.6 xxxxxx xxxxxx Green /Cycle: 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.34 0.34 ApproachLOS: C D * * Volume /Cap: 0.48 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.48 0.48 0.88 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.88 0.88 Delay /Veh: 46.4 58.7 58.7 60.6 35.6 35.6 99.4 34.5 34.5 54.7 45.6 45.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 46.4 58.7 58.7 60.6 35.6 35.6 99.4 34.5 34.5 54.7 45.6 45.6 Designaueue: 8 26 8 21 17 6 7 25 3 6 31 16 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S R 50198KPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:01p Page 2 of 3 bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 5 -1 ' bkpm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:50:47 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Boulevard Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** Intersection #19 44th / Tieton Intersection #21 40th / Arlington ************************************************* * * * * * *** * * * * * **** * * * * ** * * * * * *** ************************************************* * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * *** * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.375 Average Delay (sec /veh): 15.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.7 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ************************************************* * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 1 II 11 11 I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign 1 11 Rights: Include Include Include Include Control: Permitted Permitted I Permitted 11 Permitted I Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include 1 11 11 11 I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Base Vol: 20 790 650 55 5 45 I 11 11 11 1 I Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 21 814 670 57 5 46 Base Vol: 20 10 60 10 10 5 5 520 10 25 810 5 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 In- proccess: 0 75 15 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 21 10 62 10 10 5 5 536 10 26 834 5 Initial Fut: 21 889 685 57 5 46 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 In- process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Initial Fut: 21 10 62 10 10 5 5 536 10 26 834 5 PHF Volume: 25 1097 0 0 845 70 6 0 57 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Final Vol.: 25 1097 0 0 845 70 6 0 57 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 23 12 70 12 12 6 6 609 12 29 948 6 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 23 12 70 12 12 6 6 609 12 29 948 6 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 23 12 70 12 12 6 6 609 12 29 948 6 Cnflict Vol: 915 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1479 xxxx 457 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 11 11 a Potent Cap.: 741 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 116 xxxx 550 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Move Cap.: 741 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 113 xxxx 550 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.80 0.80 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.86 i Level Of Service 11 II II I ce Module: Lanes: 0.67 0.33 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.02 1.94 0.04 0.06 1.93 0.01 Stopped Del: 9.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1009 505 1583 649 649 324 31 3250 63 97 3149 19 LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * 11 11 ee a Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Capacity Analysis Module: Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 397 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.30 I Shrd StpDel: 10.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 15.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Shared LOS: B * * * * * * C * * * * Green /Cycle: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 15.8 xxxxxx Volume /Cap: 0.20 0.20 0.38 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.38 0.38 0.38 ApproachLOS: * * C * Delay /Veh: 40.3 40.3 42.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 40.3 40.3 42.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 Designoueue: 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 11 0 ************************************************* *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. s R 5019BKPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:01p Page 3 of 3 . ., •. -.. '-',:: = -, . , ,_.... , . - - ., .. • ',.., .. ,.. . . . .. „ . . .... „.. - ;$.„,„,.., v ,_, „•:„:„.,:: :._ I ,,, t,.::,.4A., Appendix G r-.4 1 ,f,:?,,-.1P • : Year 2003 Total Traffic Operations ... .. , , Worksheets w v e . ....4? - .. , i VOW, d • .■ ".'z.c.;:". , :"' .,,,,,_,N5,g,,?,„,t,„ :,,;„4,:=-PM,,,:: rt,''.-• ' V ',,, i Y "s\, =Sti gatZ,,,..., t.:;::'„Viiki%:- . . . - .0 .-". • - 'A- t '; Wii.r.:,_: r.,e - , ' ,,, ,OI ',„k-,„, •,,,-„, kt i. , 1!5e , a1 5 ., tf.:4214 .- • „.. z.',... -..)- . wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:51:56 Page 1 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:51:56 Page 2 -1 Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Trip Generation Report Scenario: wspm Forecast for With Site PM Command: wspm Volume: bkpm Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of Geometry: with site # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total Impact Fee: null Trip Generation: with site Trip Distribution: with site Paths: with site 1 1.00 Winco Grocery 405.00 385.00 405 385 790 91:9 Routes: null Zone 1 Subtotal 405 385 790 91.9 Configuration: wspm 2 -0.50 External Passb 70.00 70.00 -35 -35 -70 -8.1 Zone 2 Subtotal -35 -35 -70 -8.1 I i 3 internal pas 1.00 Internal Passb 70.00 70.00 70 70 140 16.3 Zone 3 Subtotal 70 70 140 16.3 TOTAL 440 420 860 100.0 � I i i I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. ! i 501916PM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:02p Page 1 of 6 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 3 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 4 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #1 Nob Hill Blvd / 42nd Ave Intersection #2 44th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** Average Delay (sec /veh): 123.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Average Delay (sec /veh): 2482.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R 1 II II II I I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I Volume Module: II 11 11 I Volume Module: I I 11 11 I Base Vol: 5 1 1 20 1 5 1 525 1 5 720 15 Base Vol: 5 1 20 15 5 10 10 490 10 25 670 35 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 5 1 1 21 1 5 1 541 1 5 742 15 Initial Bse: 5 1 21 15 5 10 10 505 10 26 690 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 17 0 17 29 194 0 0 164 59 Added Vol: 0 0 0 229 0 35 133 -6 0 0 89 8 In-process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 In-process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 Initial Fut: 5 1 1 38 1 22 30 750 1 5 941 74 Initial Fut: 5 1 21 244 5 45 143 514 10 26 814 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 6 1 1 43 1 25 35 862 1 6 1081 86 PHF Volume: 6 1 24 284 6 53 167 597 12 30 947 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 6 1 1 43 1 25 35 862 1 6 1081 86 Final Vol.: 6 1 24 284 6 53 167 597 12 30 947 51 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I 1 II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1484 2110 431 1636 2068 583 1167 xxxx xxxxx 863 xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 1473 1994 305 1665 1975 499 998 xxxx xxxxx 609 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 87 50 572 67 54 455 594 xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 88 60 691 63 61 517 689 xxxx xxxxx 965 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 76 47 572 62 50 455 594 xxxx xxxxx 775 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 57 44 691 48 45 517 689 xxxx xxxxx 965 xxxx xxxxx 1 II II 11 I 1 II 11 II I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 11.9 xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * A * * LOS by Move: * * * * * * B * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 79 xxxxx xxxx 90 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx 186 xxxxx xxxx 55 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 55.9 xxxxx xxxxx 124 xxxxx 11.4 xxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 28.2 xxxxx xxxxx 2482 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * F * * F * B * * A * * Shared LOS: * D * * F * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 55.9 123.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachDel: 28.2 2482.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F F * * ApproachLOS: D F * * Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 5019WSPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:02p Page 2 of 6 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 5 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 6 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Re P P P 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* ** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** Intersection #3 44th Ave / south Site Driveway Intersection #5 42nd Ave / north Site Driveway ************************************************* * * * * *** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * ** ************************************************* * * ** * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * ** Average Delay (sec /veh): 14.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: 8 Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A ************************************************* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I Volume Module: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Volume Module: Base Vol: 45 0 0 30 0 0 Base Vol: 0 15 25 0 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Bse: 45 0 0 30 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 15 25 0 Added Vol: 0 141 56 11 253 50 Added Vol: 5 0 0 6 In-process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 In-process: 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 45 141 56 41 253 50 Initial Fut: 5 15 25 6 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 PHF Adj: 0.9 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.90 0.9 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Volume: 50 157 62 46 281 56 PHF Volume: 6 17 28 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 50 157 62 46 281 56 Final Vol.: 6 17 28 7 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: II II II I Capacity Module: II II II I le: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 207 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 298 xxxx 128 Cnflict Vol: 28 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 28 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1377 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 697 xxxx 927 Potent Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1053 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1377 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 672 xxxx 927 Move Cap.: 1599 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1053 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of service Module: II I1 II I Level Of Service II II II I ice Module: Stopped pPed Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 704 xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 14.7 xxxxx Shrd StpDel: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * B * Shared LOS: A * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 14.7 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * B ApproachLOS: * * A * I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. � S 5019WSPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:02p Page 3 of 6 • wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 7 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 8 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington i West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) 1 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #6 42nd Ave / south Site Driveway Intersection #7 Nob Hill Blvd / Site Driveway ( 2' s. ,t.�.l,.,.� ************************************************* ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *********************************************/** a * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: A Average Delay (sec /veh): 30.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: D ************************************************* * ** * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * ** * * * ***** * * * * * * *** * * ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L ' T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 II II II I I II II II I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 15 25 0 Base Vol: 1 1 0 525 1 1 730 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 15 25 0 Initial Bse: 1 1 0 541 1 1 752 0 Added Vol: 83 5 6 28 Added Vol: 0 0 107 223 0 0 -10 191 In- process: 0 0 0 0 In- process: 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 Initial Fut: 83 20 31 28 Initial Fut: 1 1 107 779 1 1 777 191 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 User Adj: 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.90 0.9 0.9 0.9 PHF Adj: 0.87 0.8 0.87 0.8 0.8 0.87 0.8 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 PHF Volume: 92 22 34 31 PHF Volume: 1 1 123 895 1 1 893 220 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 92 22 34 31 Final Vol.: 1 1 123 895 1 1 893 220 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Critical Gp: 7.5 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I I II II II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 34 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 34 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: 1345 xxxx 448 xxxx xxxx 556 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 896 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1590 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1044 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 112 xxxx 564 xxxx xxxx 479 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 766 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1590 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1044 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 83 xxxx 564 xxxx xxxx 479 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 766 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I I II II II I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * A * * * LOS by Move: * * * * * C * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx 145 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 30.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * * * * * * Shared LOS: * D * * * * * * * A * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx ApproachDel: 30.3 15.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * ApproachLOS: D C i ! Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. �I S s B 5019WSPM.OUT 4- 25-102 3:02p Page 4 of 6 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 9 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 10 -1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 . West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** ************************************************* ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** ** * * ** Intersection #8 40th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Intersection #17 44th Av / North Site Driveway ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.958 Average Delay (sec /veh): 9.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: A Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 56.2 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Optimal Cycle: 167 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *xxxxx *xxxxx* *xxxxx* *xxxxx * * ** Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 1 11 11 11 I Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include 1 11 11 11 I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Base Vol: 45 30 0 I 11 11 11 1 Growth Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 Volume Module: Initial Bse: 45 30 0 Base Vol: 105 335 105 345 280 115 100 435 50 75 560 295 Added Vol: 50 56 11 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 In- Process: 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 108 345 108 355 288 118 103 448 52 77 577 304 Initial Fut: 95 86 11 Added Vol: 41 0 0 0 0 41 39 135 39 0 142 0 User Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 In- process: 20 75 20 0 15 0 0 15 5 5 10 0 PHF Adj: 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 Initial Fut: 169 420 128 355 303 159 142 598 96 82 729 304 PHF Volume: 95 86 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Final Vol.: 95 86 11 PHF Volume: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: Final Vol.: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 181 xxxx xxxxx 11 II 11 1 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 813 xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: Move Cap.: I xxxx xxxx xxxxx ll xxxx xxxx xxxxx ul xxxx xxxx xxxxx 813 xxxx xxxxx Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.89 0.89 Level Of Service Module: Lanes: 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.00 1.31 0.69 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.41 0.59 Stopped Del:xxxx * x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx * x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1769 2616 798 1769 2198 1155 1769 2987 477 1769 2387 995 i LOS by Move: A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Capacity Analysis Module: II 11 11 1 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.34 **** * * ** * * ** **** 0.34 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * Green /Cycle: 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.08 0.35 0.35 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.5 Volume /Cap: 0.62 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.62 0.62 0.96 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.96 0.96 ApproachLOS: * * * A Delay /Veh: 49.9 73.9 73.9 78.9 41.5 41.5 111.6 32.2 32.2 60.4 54.7 54.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . AdjDel /Veh: 49.9 73.9 73.9 78.9 41.5 41.5 111.6 32.2 32.2 60.4 54.7 54.7 Design0ueue: 11 26 8 21 18 9 10 30 5 6 38 16 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. . B 5019WSPM.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:02p Page 5 of 6 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 11 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:52:02 Page 12 -1 Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** ************************************************* ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #19 44th / Tieton Intersection #21 Arlington / 40th ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.454 Average Delay (sec /veh): 16.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: C Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 7.7 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Movement: L - T- R L - T- R 1 - T- R L- T- R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 1 11 11 11 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign 11 11 11 1 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: 11 11 11 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Base Vol: 20 790 650 55 5 45 1 11 11 11 1 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.03 1.0 1.0 1.0 j Volume Module: Initial Bse: 21 814 670 57 5 46 Base Vol: 20 10 60 10 10 5 5 520 10 25 810 5 i Added Vol: 0 39 41 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 In- process: 0 75 15 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 21 10 62 10 10 5 5 536 10 26 834 5 Initial Fut: 21 928 726 57 5 46 Added Vol: 12 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 15 41 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.0 1.0 1.0 In- Process: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Initial Fut: 33 10 101 10 10 5 5 536 25 67 834 5 PHF Volume: 25 1145 0 0 896 70 6 0 57 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Final Vol.: 25 1145 0 0 896 70 6 0 57 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 37 12 115 12 12 6 6 609 29 76 948 6 Critical Gap Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Reduced Vol: 37 12 115 12 12 6 6 609 29 76 948 6 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx l l x xxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxx xxxxx l PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Module: , Final Vol.: 37 12 115 12 12 6 6 609 29 76 948 6 Cnflict Vol: 966 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1554 xxxx 483 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 11 11 1 Potent Cap.: 709 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 104 xxxx 530 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Saturation Flow Module: ! Move Cap.: 709 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 101 xxxx 530 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.78 0.78 0.78 Level Of Service 11 11 II ice Module: Lanes: 0.76 0.24 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.02 1.89 0.09 0.15 1.84 0.01 Stopped Del: 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Final Sat.: 1114 352 1583 656 656 328 30 3148 149 220 2746 17 LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * * * * 11 11 11 1 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Capacity Analysis Module: Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 372 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.35 Shrd StpDel: 10.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Shared LOS: B * * * * * * C * * * * Green /Cycle: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.7 xxxxxx Volume /Cap: 0.21 0.21 0.45 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.45 0.45 0.45 ApproachLOS: * * C Delay /Veh: 37.0 37.0 39.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 i User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 37.0 37.0 39.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 Designoueue: 2 1 5 1 1 0 0 8 0 1 14 0 ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 5019WSPM,OUT 4- 25-102 3:02p Page 6 of 6 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:53:46 Page 1 -1 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:53:46 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 ' West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions with Mitigations -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Conditions with Mitigations -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Level Of Service Computation Report Scenario: wspm 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Command: wspm Intersection #2 44th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd Volume: bkpm ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Geometry: with site Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.649 Impact Fee: null Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 28.2 Trip Generation: with site Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C Trip Distribution: with site ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Paths: with site Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Routes: null Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Configuration: wspm 1 1 11 ee 11 e i Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Module. 11 11 11 e Base Vol: 5 1 20 15 5 10 10 490 10 25 670 35 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1 Initial Bse: 5 1 21 15 5 10 10 505 10 26 690 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 229 0 35 133 -6 0 0 89 8 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 35 0 Initial Fut: 5 1 21 244 5 45 143 514 10 26 814 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 6 1 24 284 6 53 167 597 12 30 947 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 6 1 24 284 6 53 167 597 12 30 947 51 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: I 6 1 24 284 6 53 167 597 12 30 947 51 Saturation Flow Module: 11 11 11 e Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' 1 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.73 0.85 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 0.19 0.04 0.77 1.00 0.10 0.90 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 311 62 1242 1383 164 1446 1769 3458 69 1769 3329 180 Capacity Analysis Module: 11 11 11 e V0l /Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.21 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.28 0.28 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.15 0.53 0.53 0.05 0.44 0.44 Volume /Cap: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.65 0.12 0.12 0.65 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.65 0.65 Delay /Veh: 28.6 28.6 28.6 38.7 29.2 29.2 54.1 16.0 16.0 56.9 27.4 27.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 28.6 28.6 28.6 38.7 29.2 29.2 54.1 16.0 16.0 56.9 27.4 27.4 ' Designaueue: 0 0 1 13 0 2 10 19 0 2 38 2 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 5019USMT.OUT 4 -25 -102 3:04p Page 1 of 2 wspm Thu Apr 25, 2002 14:53:46 Page 3 -1 Kittelson 8 Associates, Inc. -- Project #5019 West Nob Hill Supermarket Site -- Yakima, Washington Total Traffic Conditions with Mitigations -- Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ************************************************* * * ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection #8 40th Ave / Nob Hill Blvd ************************************************* * * * * ***** * * * * ** *** * * * *** * * * * *** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.908 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y +R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 50.7 Optimal Cycle: 133 Level Of Service: D ************************************************* * * * *** * * * * * * * *** * * * ** * * * * * *** ** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Split Phase II Split Phase II Protected 11 Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Volume Modul II II 11 e Base Vol: 105 335 105 345 280 115 100 435 50 75 560 295 i Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 108 345 108 355 288 118 103 448 52 77 577 304 Added Vol: 41 0 0 0 0 41 39 135 39 0 142 0 PasserByVol: 20 75 20 0 15 0 0 15 5 5 10 0 Initial Fut: 169 420 128 355 303 159 142 598 96 82 729 304 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 188 467 142 395 337 177 158 665 106 91 810 338 Flow II 11 II e Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.93 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.31 1.11 0.58 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.41 0.59 Final Sat.: 1769 2616 798 2191 1871 983 1769 2987 477 1769 2387 995 Capacity Analysis Module: 11 II 1e Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.34 0.34 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.37 0.37 Volume /Cap: 0.54 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.91 0.91 Delay /Veh: 45.1 63.4 63.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 96.5 30.0 30.0 57.9 45.4 45.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 45.1 63.4 63.4 58.8 58.8 58.8 96.5 30.0 30.0 57.9 45.4 45.4 DesignQueue: 10 26 8 22 19 10 10 29 5 6 37 15 ************************************************* ** * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * ** * * ** * ** * * * ** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. s 1 I 5019115MT.0UT 4- 25-102 3:04p Page 2 of 2 • • } 4:t is y . Appendix es 774L v Queuing Worksheets 4 01.447 . • `. � - 44 • Project Name: West Nob Hill Supermarket Site Project #: 5019 Analysis Scenario: Total Traffic V = flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 0.25 (peak 15 minute analysis) C = capacity of movement Analyst: Glenn Blackwelder Q = 95th percentile queue (veh) Dote: April 10, 2002 5 = storage need (ft) # of Int: 1 Veh. Length (ft): 25 • Queue length calculated using Equation (17 -37) presented in Highway Capacity Manua / 0000 NB LT NB TH NB RT 58 LT 58 TH 58 RT EB LT EB TH EB RT WB LT WB TH WB RT V 8 69 35 6 C 79 90 594 775 Nob Hill /42nd 0.3 3.9 0.2 0.0 5 25 100 25 25 5019 Unsig Queue Intersection Summary SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS ............... , ...,.. - Project Name: MINOlftliff00 7 9:' t-:: / KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: OtEggifete, % '4 '`, : L1 7 - 6 • Analyst: !ditittlteltPka 1 ,X,. ` "ig(r-t-V:, - `4 Date: 4/10/2002 h. I (503) 228-5230 • Filename: - .crojilie \-5019■xlsJ5019 UnsIg Queue xlslintersecnon SurnmarY Fax (503) 273-9169 Intersection: Conditions (yr. alt.. etc.): IDD:itiit GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: t I Cycle Lengtn .'!,:::::/:121) sec Confidence Level ( 0 L Storaoe length/vehicle ;:: •: feet APPROACH/MOVEMENT 1 #5 1 #6 ! 47 #6 II 1714aft71MBIWRIT - - --2 , 14 - 514111:77rStrtiliRri783EVITEer1141FirtuNiat7r* . 8Thiltri !INPUT PARAMETERS: I I 1 1 Volume (pre-PHF) (von) 17.7.7r, 69 ., 7: f-i::,: - 17 ::- 1* 4L : G/C for movement g tf21-4 -- --3,,;,iilrii Iiir,---26:' . a,---44i ''' • " ,, -„1- , -..,....,..:. ' :.:'-i:;,,,-. a4.-.,- '';:r., Number of lanes :::-.-, ; .4 ; :-..-,A4..,1 , 4.-2;•.),;J: ,i,-,ii . 1..t..LgiLtaili izai4-. e.ii'a 'hiali4.2 I II I I CALCULATIONS: Lenatn of red interval (sec) 99 6 97 2 92 4 90 0 109.2 76.8 110 4 78.0 Average total queue (vein) 4 14 8 9 1 11.6 4,3 14.8 2.5 22.4 Maximum total queue veh) 1 81 21 14 17 8 21 5 30 Total queue length (feet) 200 525 350 425 200 525 125 750 Required storage/lane (feet) 200 275 350 225 200 275 125 375 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: .,-,,:, Opposing volume (pre-PHF) 1...«-.,. 7I:`"4-11i: ..::::::-.,i,,,),..,„ Opposing sat flow rate ...,Z;41i•iii4iP:.: ..ii., I II !CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo) 11 Unblocked G/C Effective red interval (sec) Average total queue (ven) Maximum total queue (yen) Total queue lengtn (feet) 1 Required storage/lane (feet) METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Lengln of reo ',nerve, = I: - c. 9 . Cvc■e ter., Oueue lengtn = Maxprnurn Queue ' Storage long, ner 0e001e Average oueueAane = VO:u 1 Se-'r ■stevao ' 3630 Reour. storage Der lane = Queue long, Number 01 lanes noursgeo uo .:ne next higreSt ...role venicle Mac!, u-s aseue Aanoo—larsva,;:onsta, serAce Ranoo-1 arrvals nenave aoocro, to a Poisscs a stnont. Onoos,ng how rata Yo = orssowng volume vo / at sat how rate son Tnere .5 a ercssatssiv equal . ir.c oonlvaesce mve [les te g 95`. tnat tne aseue ton ousng each re-1 .nteva■ svoi ce less man Unocoren 0409040! =*'0 O. 0 eklual to 1ne maxlros, nue, I 0040 01 e,..,5 . NI ,040.7 trgery&09 1 esp. ' rn (Inc Posson 0istrinul.011 1 01 arrwais 0= NI = 1 - 50!!' 01 nrooau,ses tor vencles 9 ,, Mao 5 rlIgnest 5 sun, mat tne sun, o: orooarvi,es s '1 - 000(040000 1000!: SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS - Project Name: # • • • ...,;' - f ` "4 : 'f A'; • / KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number. s a -- ,. r s ' .ey`,e r / /II 610 SW Alder. Suite 70C c t :i : C . ; r -� / - "'*sa " i Portlan Ore Analyst: Rs. -: z e k Ore 97205 Date: 4/10/2002 f� I (503) 228 -5230 Filename: Horplfile\ 5019V IS�5o19 ape advance SI000EUExLS )SmaPhase \ Fax. (503) 273 -8169 Intersection: s •,>•:,....r., ` : :1 . 4UZr , :4S Conditions (yr, alt, etc.): rY <� GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length ? sec C onfidence Level (C L J i s 5 Storage length/vehicle ffifeet APPROACH /MOVEMENT 1 #1 I #2 #3 1 i #4 #5 #6 #7 #6 r " N a:r : i - ., «- 4 t . _ tY . - . _ : - 1 ...1. M.• - :,: ',1� INPUT PARAMETERS: � I I Volume (pre-PHF) (vph) - il .rr.•_x. -,src ' G/C for movement t + .`..s+ D' s i s + s} ° 't--''' . 10 £.. ' , a OAS § ri r Number of lanes , — , ` tr4u s !i.. „rs e .4 1' rs t.......1.! ,;....t.,:-. ,_ _. "' 1- "K " 2 : ` � .i.�,i�ki' •> - e I CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec) 96.0 96.0 96 0 96 0 96.0 108.0 74 4 109.21 Average total queue (veh,' 4.5 14 6 7.3 7 3 7.3 4.3 14 3 2.5' 21 7 Maximum total queue (veh) 8 21 12 12 12 8 21 5 30 Total queue length (feet) 200 525 300 300 300 200 525 125 750 Required storage /lane (feet) 200 275 300 300 300 200 275 125 375 LEFT TURNS: I I Opposing volume (pre -PHF) ,....,....#.,..... ° ' s." - .s.# = ir" too. -. Opposing sat flow rate CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo) Unblocked G/C Effective red interval (sec) Average total queue (veh) Maximum total queue (veh) Total queue length (feet)' Required storage /lane (feet). ( I I METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Leong, 01 rep interval =II • GC • Cvc a iergt^ Queue ■ang[. = Maximum uueue' Storage longtn ror vehicle Average uueualane a Volume' Red Interval' 3600 Reouued storage oar lane = Ououo length r Number of tenes roun0ou up to the next highest whole von.. Maximum weue Random arma.Constant service Random armais behave accoromg to a Poisson a,stnouuor Opposing Ilow ratio vo 0 opposing volume v0 , Opposing sat Dow rate sob There ,s a prooaduN Douai to me °ensconce level oosnod I0 g 95':. final Ina cueue lorme0 ounng aeon red mil be less man Unblocked G'C Igts C, = Ig C '0''''00' :.001 or actual to In. maximum pueue (P.00 01 arnvals - 9I = iReu 1,1000n 0.4,4/ 9' One Poisson 0rsmoueon , (Prop of arnvals a= 9, = t • Sum of pr0oadli,ies for vanities 0 1 . 9•1 Max 9 nignesl N won Inez the sum of probabilities O 1 t - conlmence level, SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS - Project Name: r ; ; : :::: - .. ,,. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC. Project Number: liiiW-K, 74,....— ..4...;a -; .....,.....,4-"47.11r..,--- ' r rr 4 ; " -'7 ' - '"''' .4 ° 7 610 SW AlareroSn 97205 Date: Analyst: .„_:::-..; ':::: nd Oreg '' '"'-''' ;::;;' ...s...:;441....,:..,4.4. Date: 4/25/2002 N : (503) 228-5230 Filename: H zrorlileZ019 \xis \i 5019 awe chhgence SIGOUEUE XLSi4.4m Fax (503) 273 Intersection: ;r "7:11'1"*ItrIl • rq'"'.... -- V-,p. 7-4....s.--,:, i:-...,...._ : --,),-,.. ,; ' 'N:''..,,,,: t- %,... Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): - ...as,ritr •,-, :• r; c ■ - :, 1...w.i.•: .1_ -. s it,,,,-.4,,--- GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length itp,:-... sec Confidence Level (C.L Storage lenath/vehicle :,-s-,:-. feet APPROACH/MOVEMENT 1 #1 ! #2 #3 1 #4 I #5 I 0 6 1 *7 I *43 I 1 1 INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume (pre-PHF) rvph) „, 7: • - ,,,,,,z.-:_ :i.,,..,,,,,,,.,,,, - -Zi 1 , :' '-;,,1 ,,,, ,.. " ,■. ,„,... ..,, ; hi • l',.::::r:: ,..;;VP4:" '=‘,.. ''''' .... ,.. 'At ' 4 ,r-re W.:."'' G/C for movement - =',V , ‘51.) , tr-v- 5 ..: Tfi'urtiVA.,..:"...ot ' , :,...'.„ '- •-: - _ ...,.7ilit ;wip--T,,:— ,.tz -- qtsg,......tig ..,, "A t , - : • • ,... N umber of lanes , ----r— . , --=1, ,,,,;.- 7. t.,h- . _ ' ' , ...r. - ' 'I. ' -"°. ' .. ■ 4 " - - 1 , ,.., '''. -'.-,,-, 1 l CALCULATIONS: I Length of red interval (sec) 81.6 81 6 81.6 102 0 56 4 114 0 67.2, Average total queue (veh) 0.6 5.5 11 4.1 8.2 0.8 16.0 Maximum total queue (veh) 2 10 3 8 13 3 23' Total queue length (feet) 50 250 751 200 325 75 575( Required storage/lane (feet) 50 250 75 200 175 75 3 W I I PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre-PHF) Opposing sat flow rate -:::::,-;.•.,,,,F :.:::.::7-1,1'. :'‘;', -7,-.;.--.',7:> *T-A:*.-.179,z,.t a 1 CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo) 0.02 Unblocked G/C 0.30 Effective red interval (sec) 83.5 Average total queue (veh) 5.7 Maximum total queue (veh) 10 1 Total queue length (feet) 250 I Required storage/lane (feet) 250 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: Lev', of ran interval = (1 - QVQI - Cycle langV, Queue Iongln = Maximum oueue ' Storage tengtn ow verve. Average aueusVOne = Volume ' Rea Irvervai / 3600 Rea:Laren storage oer lane = Queue iengtn / Number of lanes. rouncted uo to tne next highest Arno. yenta. Maximum queue Ranaorn arrival/Constant service Ransom amvais oehave acaoratng to a Poisson aistribution 01300sing flow ratio To = ophosing volume vo / opposing sat (low rale soa Tnere . a orooarstrty eouat to tne aantioence level aesireo te g 95 1001 1,10 queue lormeg awing eacn red interval 0,11 50 less tnan Unoksaxam Gic tguiC) s (SVC • Tor" -T or equal 10 50 maximum Queue (Prop ol amvais = NI = (Red trvervaINN • 000(04) ) N (the Poisson ClisinO.ton) (Prop at arnva. 0= 9/ = 1 • Sum 01 prom:tames lor venves 0 1, 9.1 Max 9 Hignest N such 1,151 1,10 sum al oroorsoilmes s (1 - cordoence (evel) . .r: A • . %3T.e f %�J�����5 Appendix 1 � *6 , l ° -' xY s MUTCD Signal Warrant ` � Worksheets : L .„..: d y a; ,..„,..„.„„:., ,,,,g.:::„, ,,, ,..., , v,,,,,,,,,k..,,,,,,:„...„,4.,,,. v,...„.,,, h,.., , , r.,,,,,,,mk,,,,,,.. ,„,,,,#.„-.„ ,..,...„.,,,y, -„,- A ,:.,,,,,.„,,,,.„,„ ,,,,..,,„„z„...„,„ ,,,,., f . - MUTCD Signal Warrant Analysis KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project #: f-t 1,� 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Project Name: 66,A0.- � ��c^ �. Portland. Oregon 97205 _ -4,At (503) 228 5230 Analyst: ,4:,•.: ,,r fi Intersection: 1 iq - Fax (503) 273 -8169 Scenario: tt' #M- Date: 4/10/2002 File: Hlprojtile\5019■xis \(5019 42nd -NHB wspm MUTCD.XLS]Main Input Data: Turning Movement Volumes: North -South Approach = Ettilrno Minor East -West Approach = Major Major Street Thru Lanes = 1141=2 22 1 38 Minor Street Thru Lanes = r=::-°1d 44 (j . g 8th Highest/Peak Hour (Major) = 'W L� 8th Highest/Peak Hour (Minor) = 30 74 Speed > 40 mph? Major 750 b a 941 Major Population < 10.000? =. 1 IT 5 Warrant Factor 100% ti 4 E 5 1 1 Minor Signal Warrant Analysis Results Actual Required Warrant Approach Volumes Volumes Met? 1 - Minimum Major Street 1261 600 No Vehicular Volume Minor Street 43 150 2 - Interruption of Major Street 1261 900 No Continuous Traffic Minor Street 43 75 11 - Peak Hour Major Street 1801 1801 No Volume Minor Street 61 100 . MUTCD Signal Warrant Analysis KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project #: . I. •} . " ` s 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Project Name: / rig x� yt 4•f� '' Portland, Oregon 97205 Analyst: �� ' � '� -- � � (503) 228 -5230 �s 7�R Intersection: " r" " : .,...","Art _ Fax (503) 273 -8169 Scenario: = P o . $ .... Date: 4/10/2002 File: HAorojtile\501 \(5019 44th -NHB wspm MUTCD.XLS)Mam Input Data: Turning Movement Volumes: North -South Approach = Nil: Minor East -West Approach = Major Major Street Thru Lanes = 4••* 45 5 244 Minor Street Thru Lanes = `'rte`° 5:_14 ma 11 �] - sC.s,_..,. y •4 l� 8th Highest/Peak Hour (Major) = ::i7D% • 8th Highest/Peak Hour (Minor) = e = {u' w,' 143 cJ' 44 • Speed > 40 mph? : l± -, s Major 514 b a 814 Major Population < 10.000? 1#4-410s 10 91 26 Warrant Factor 100% ‘0' 5 1 21 Minor Signal Warrant Analysis Results Actual Required Warrant Approach Volumes Volumes Met? 1 - Minimum Major Street 1086 600 Yes Vehicular Volume Minor Street 206 150 2 - Interruption of Major Street 1086 900 Yes Continuous Traffic Minor Street 206 75 11 - Peak Hour Major Street 1551 1551 Yes Volume Minor Street 294 130 SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. REZONE Exhibit List CHAPTER H NOTICES EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE 11-1 Notice of Application and Public Hearing & Request for Comments 7 -5 -02 H -2 Adjoining property owners notified 7 -5 -02 H -3 Affidavit of Mailing 7 -5 -02 H -4 Hearing Examiner Agenda 8 -22 -02 H -5 Posting of Property Certification 8 -1 -02 H -6 Legal Notice 8 -2 -02 H -7 Hearing Sign -in sheet 8 -22 -02 H -8 Parties of Record list 8 -22 -02 H -9 Notification of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation to City Council 9 -3 -02 H -10 Affidavit of Mailing 9 -3 -02 H -11 Notification of Public Hearing by the Yakima City Council 9 -6 -02 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Rezone Application of Skyland Company, Inc. for property in vicinity of 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. and 911 S. 44th Ave., Yakima, WA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Yakima City Council will conduct a Closed Record Public Hearing to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the Master application (rezone) submitted by Skyland Company, Inc. The property is located in the vicinity of 4309 West Nob Hill Boulevard and 911 South 44th Avenue, Yakima, WA. If approved, the 3.16 acres would be rezoned from R -3 (Multi- Family Residential) to SCC (Small Convenience Center). A Class (2) review will also be considered for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning district, and a combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building, and the number of parking spaces. Said closed record public hearing will be held Tuesday, September 17, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Yakima City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. All interested persons are invited to attend this closed record public hearing. Closed Record Hearing means the public is invited to testify on the Hearing Examiner's records but will not be allowed to introduce any new information. Dated this 6th day of September, 2002 Karen S. Roberts City Clerk [Si] Si Usted requiere que esta noticia sea en espanol, por favor, marque en la caja que dice "sf" y devuelva esta noticia a Karen Roberts lo mas pronto posible. [Yes ] If you require the assistance of a sign language interpreter and cannot provide one yourself, please mark the "yes" box and return this notice to the City Clerk as soon as possible. Mailed: September 6, 2002 INDEX �" { Ctz 4 o ')- AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA Re: bf 1 /2_Z4 ? -0� COJ ow -d - K y /and C® sh 2n G . (A c 1 h 1' y ' 3o q _ / /vdb M, ?i e/ a. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of the Hearing Examiners recommendation to the Yakima City Council. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all parties of record which are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 3 day of S- ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. O at,r4.,,eue • l� Christine M. Wilson DOC. INDEX =� 1223-6 a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r• •�N Planning Division g. .:�� 's 129 North Second Street ' # D Yakima, Washington 98901 1 W§ F 3 Phone (509) 575 -6183 ® Fax (509) 575 -6105 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO THE YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL, On September 3, 2002 the Yakima Hearing Examiner Pro Tem rendered his recommendation on a Master Application submitted by Skyland Company, Inc. The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, (Multi - Family Residential) to SCC, (Small Convenience Center). The application also requests Class (2) land use review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket. The subject property is located in the vicinity of 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd., Yakima, Washington. The application was reviewed at a public hearing held by the Hearing Examiner Pro Tem on August 22, 2002. A copy of the Hearing Examiner Pro Tem's Findings and Recommendation is enclosed. The Hearing Examiner Pro Tem's recommendation will be considered by the Yakima City Council in a closed record public hearing to be scheduled. The City Clerk will notify you of the date, time and place of the public hearing. For further information or assistance you may contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, at the City of Yakima Planning Division located on the 2nd floor of Yakima City Hall, (129 North Second Street), or by calling 575 -6042. Doug Maples Planning and Code Administration Manager Date of mailing: 9/3/02 Yakima DOC. I m gr. INDEX # --9 1994 F ez 3 -0- Skyland Company RZ#3 -02 Additional Parties of Record - Mr. Jonathan Burtnett Mr. Scott L. Wippel Mr. Ken Harper Skyland Company, Inc. Corporate Real Estate Affilliates No. 39th Ave. P.O. Box 400 11880 S W Riverview Lane Yakima, WA 98902 Woodburn, OR 97071 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Mr. Dick Graf Mr. John McArdle Graf Investments, Inc. 1610 Eldridge Ave. 410 S. 1st St. Bellingham, WA 98225 Selah, WA 98942 DOC. INDEX HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS HEARING DATE: August 22, 2002 CASE #: APPLICANT: SITE ADDRESS: (A) UAZO RZ#4-02, EC#12-02 Shields Bag & Printing Co. 914 thru 1013 Landon Ave. (B) UAZO RZ#3-02, EC#11-02 Sky land Co., Inc. 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd. INDICATE CASE NO. NAME: ADDRESS: ZIP: (A,B,C): PLEASE PRINT ' - C- ". )1 \A: 30€. ; 1 •ce 5 /t (.) LA) , /I u - 11 . 7 ((4--.-f 1 /C /c_ 7/6- 4 C. r f DOC. INDEX gz # 0 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the undersigned that a public hearing will be held by the Yakima City Hearing Examiner Pro Tem to consider a rezone request submitted by Skyland Company, Inc. The applicant is proposing to rezone 3.16 acres of property from R -3 (Multi - Family Residential) to SCC (Small Convenience Center). A Class (2) review is also requested for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket within the SCC zoning district, and a combined environmental review occasioned by the rezone, the size of the building, and the number of parking spaces. The subject property is located in the vicinity of 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd., Yakima, Washington. The open record public hearing has been set for Thursday, August 22, 2002, beginning at 9:00 a.m., or soon thereafter, in the Council Chambers of Yakima City Hall, 129 North Second Street, Yakima, Washington. Parcel Numbers: 181327-24019, 24020 & 24028 Further information regarding this application may be obtained by contacting Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901, or by calling 575 -6042. Doug Maples Planning & Code Administration Manager Please publish once only on: Friday, August 2, 2002 Please mail affidavit of publication to: Account # 11002 City of Yakima Planning Division. 129 N 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Filed Hearing Examiner EXH 0, /--( DateJ °2" d� File* 42-# 3 —o �— ;off Y 3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT o °� l ?,, Planning Division g=: 129 North Second Street 1, Q **041 .... Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575 -6183 o Fax (509) 575 -6105 \h RP(,R4TEik S' POSTING OF PROPERTY CERTIFICATION I understand that the Section 16.05.010 of the Yakima Municipal Code and the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance require me to post the property at least 20 days prior to the public hearing. G ' the Notice of Public Hearing on sign(s) I certify that on 0 " U provided by the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development was posted on the property located at so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property. Signature Date (Please return to the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development before your public hearing to confirm the posting requirements of the ordinance above have been met.) Filed Hearing Examiner EXH # 1 Yakima Tf - S ,Date g /-6 File# lQ2 -a 1���I 1994 CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA Thursday, August 22, 2002 Yakima City Hall 9:00 AM Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTION III. PUBLIC HEARING A. SHIELDS BAG & PRINTING COMPANY Planner Assigned: Dan Valoff File Number: UAZO RZ #4 -02 & UAZO EC #12 -02 Location: 914 through 1013 Landon Avenue Request: Rezone 12 parcels from R -2 to M -1 B. SKYLAND COMPANY, INC. Planner Assigned: Bruce Benson File Number: UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL(2) #21 -02 & EC #11 -02 Location: Vicinity of 4309 W. Nob Hill Blvd Request: Rezone 2 parcels from R -3 to SCC and construct a 79,000 sq. ft., 24 -hour supermarket IV. ADJOURNMENT If you are unable to attend the hearing, you may submit your comments in writing prior to the hearing. You may also submit written testimony at the hearing. Filed Hearing Examines EXH ,Date File # IeZ 4r3 - O - AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA Re: UAZ 7_,0' 3 I Gc0J -# /- 62 E c #l l -6 Y f y /an 6( LD. Inc-• `(3d 9 W. Pdb ;// .g1/1d 1, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Public Hearing by the City Hearing Examiner, a true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 5 day of .T� Cy ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson Filed Hearing Examiner EXH #}/ - 3 Date 7_S File # —0D-- • N ±3 ; . v -_:._ -. -.. • - -.. ; .... ... . ... -, - PARCEL HAS ORMATION LIST'. �-:;.=:_ 3>=' c= �S_ a: �. c�.'_: � �,.:: irr' cS:=.;. �__.., p�_: r` �'-:. c_ _c__- ._Pa ;;_ °3 = : PE0 - _ - - - .. . . . _ $ .._ _ _ _ 1 � '11 - :12; 07' -02= 02, ' For L 1s - v a zo ,_ _ - - ; x5'; ;; L�' -2.-3! - g ,: " - _ el' - Owners Na c - -. - - _ . .. _ , _ . : .. � Addrd� s z.._,._ ..:.... .. ', ,.' 181327 -21002 YAKIMA CITY YAKIMA, Washington 98901 -2613 ■ 181327 -21003 YAKIMA SCHOOL #7 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 -2636 _- . - _ NS , - .... r••�p.. - - __ - - - - _ _ _ _ . - J2 ... H - &'SY LE :'JOHNSON ?- •ie "'::r: ,•._ -...'; 'f.YAICIINA „ "'�7as hin - Eon'. �989d2 ,. �_ >ide_ >`:z; =�::•_ _ 7.81. JO N E JR,_ 8 - _ ,., - __ __ -_ - - : -_-- _ ,:j�:1�.:_ _ _ _ .. TA YAf�I caa __:.; : z.�'t :S.C-= ;`. >':r.7 €y.,_ -�,:.: � {�TS” .81327 - 22 32... MARGARET = E L -MC CELLAND. � �_- _...�•�� �•� -��- ' -��`�" MA� „aWashin ton - , l~ - - -- - - 181327 _ 2433__:.., . CAROLINE ROTH .. -.--- . -. •, `: - ': :'t!'.; ;: : . ":y'..;';.r. YAKIMA;- ;Wa ; 908- 33,58s ?;� �,:z� �._S<� �_ � 181327 4 -Z - -r DONNA : - J: HARRING TON ..; - . ,1 YAKIMA • ,; : ,Wa 0 hiyigto - 98908 ?,..:42„ 0 a,bs_ .m t,,.. - :,. .. - v ..a_... ,i,�___,,.,._.,�. 181327 -22435 GLENN NORMAN N. ET AL GRESHAM, Oregon 97030 - 181327 -22436 JOHN M MCARDLE BELLINGHAM, Washington 98225 181327 -23001 YAKIMA SCHOOL #7 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 -2636 181327 -23012 YAKIMA SCHOOL #7 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 =2636 181327 - 24'003 -' PERVAULT_ FAMILY_. PROPERTIES. LLC_•-':= •` • _,:, , , - ...YA `YC INJA,.- B/sl4i: rig onr;98908 �9.50 ,°= - . - ._• ... . ... . . . .:: . .. . _ _. ,. •181327-2,4004",f,.. ANDREW L CYNDI-, S•�, MULLENHOFF . :'��,�,- „ ° :. , ; .:YAKI Washingto ag09,08,:;,:; - = • a� _ -,_ ' 181327-214:=0,05:...f.",- ::: DAVID -R "BROWN = ' ; - ' � . � ' - YAKIMA, = : WasHingt 9, `'--';';,_„.;� -- 181327-Z44006 - :' PERRAULT FAMILY PROPERTIES„ LLC, - , [; : ,,.i ,:- { ! ;ia M YAKIA, ashing,to98908, ,;95O �ri, 5 ,,, _ �,:,._ - _ _ . s _ _ _ 181327 -24007 PYRAMID PROPERTIES L L C YAKIMA, WW n4 �ashington 98908 -2840 3 181327 -24012 CHAK KONG & YUK PING LUI YAKIMA, Washington 98902 181327 -24013 GRAF INVESTMENTS INC - SELAH, Washington 98942 181327 -24015 R. W. INGHAM CASHMERE, Washington 98815 -9619 '; -. ' --- , .:,. - - _ -- - - _ -_ _ - - _ _ - _ '181327-24,016 "; +.'r :.;.:: "x:i;; ' :• ' - '_:��`.:.'YA'KI MA •.. Y7askSsh "Yo in: 098901'-.° 1' 28'. 7. i :: r"-"- :,:�:, :: °: > ;dF= ::, � -•-.r ;�.: - -; _ _- PAUL' BURLYNGAME-- r,�-- ' .. _..'. ' g ' _ ___P cr,: �. - .1 _ ,.• °::. °. 1613 27 - 24 017; '.,',' RALPH- M -TR THOMPSON• - - •:_:.;- _ -- -•'� - _ ,--.. _ __ • ter 181327 ,240 8 ,.,...,.;. JAMES -, P -: &,.. MARY -, BUSEY - � �•'-" � , . • - <SELAH' „_., W as hing t on, • 98942 - - - - 181327 -24020 DOUGLAS H LEMON YAKIMA, Washington 98907 181327-24019_ :: ?:. ,DOUGLAS + H; LEMON _ „:,,, ', YAKIMA i 9a 6hIngton- ;9890.9 - ., _ - ,- • - _ •• _ _ 181327 -24021 SCOTT J ETAL SPOONER SELAH, Washington 98942 181327 -24022 DENNIS L ETUX FLUEGGE YAKIMA, Washington 989011648 181327 -24024 JONATHAN C. ET UX SHIREY YAKIMA, Washington 98908 -3804 RUCE ''P,' &i-, LINDA - IM 18t327-24025 ; �. '' E�3CINNEY,'.: �.' �••: : .: :.::.... ^�_:, -:�,. . "': ' as fii$ oiv : "98'908 "•'- :': '= 4 - , i ;r.r,_:.�. - _ - - - _ ;18132 - 24026,- DORAN:'. J,_& MARY,./. R' RIEHL l , MA-;;; A ahir{g,tgn . 98.908 _ „&j - ; Ai ? :. ,'vt 18132,7'424027. :,. EST YAKIMA MEDSCAL. - BUI LllING. �PTN < ::`��: : ' '.'ti - -- � - - � - -� � ' � � r.' ^� - .- :e' - -� .`.. -� YAKMA;?;:Washi�iigton �: 9 8 ' 9. 02 ;:: 1: t: "':' °:_*-- �:_:� `::_'� -.: i, .; ;;'; ' r;:•,:.._: _- � .:..; �'. _:y;,. r.147.;�, �: -: -•� ;18132,7 - 24028 „ i. jEFFERY;. ET, Ali;;AND,ERS ON; ;!,.,,,-- ..: -,., •-,-: ,,, „- :• YAKIMA, - :F. Wastiagton :98808 143,5',;: 181327 -24029 ERIC & HARRIET YIN MERCER ISLAND, Washington 98040 -3737 181327 -24030 ERIC & HARRIET YIN MERCER ISLAND, Washington 98040 -3737 181327 -24400 MICHAEL C & ANN M LA RIVIERE YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327 -24401 GARY & ROSEMARY HOON , YAKIMA, Washington 98902 •8 3 7 2.. - : - .: - ..,. . ' -. . ..,,;. - - - _ .1 1 2 ..2440 -. � -: „GARY.& ROSEMARY ,NOON . >. --.. ':,,` ___ . ,•. : -�., r ,, _ ,. ': " ;.���YAKINIA •:.Wa'slti.ih t'ori := ;9 , 8:902� =: `! r` = 5:: __ _ _ - YAKI M A ,� ;Washin ton�:.9 B 90B: =323'Y :. : � - � - a*� ''���"`x :r.- '�T:: • 27 . -, 2 4 4 03 ' .: _ : -; YAKIMA. ASSOC:,FOR,�:COMM:::LIV ^ " -: i_:a. . - . _ ; :: . �.: ,.. . ... <>_, �. t_.,..__.: rs>: a_._:. �.: r�:; r:. � '�`�a'ciC..— _i•. 9 'I8Y'3'2.7` .: _- .•. YAKIMAASSOC..FOP. COFII�7 n .....: . - -, _. . - : ... � ' :'- .. �;`• - � ;i; , _ - __ .__,., __r,.. -,; _ - _ _ _ _ - _ � -' -. _ ' -:. �. _. _ .- ..___,...,... . __.:. . - :. >.... ' hn g, do n;389p,8.c32 -3 $r. - - _ >i ��`''„ "_.�.,`x�,.;'= :�r.: .YAKIMA Was � 8 32:7,',:',24-4,06:,"..i•:-;",2•,--;.:_: - � -- - - 1 KARL .G JR - G .S ' 1 RAF E s - - _ - . �-- ^a'- �:_m•..•.. _.. -.� _.._._,,......_:< ..... ... ...: .__.., _.,.,.. - <<.. LAH - a hin ton _ _ . -ce .:W n - .- .'= !a.*:ti iii ss, i. 5a_:E="., A- K: sn). 4, tt' s::a >fssc�m�r:s� xra.: 181327 -24407 JAMES B & SALLY F FITCH YAKIMA, Washington 98902 181327 -24409 RICHARD 8 TIPTON YAKIMA, Washington 98903 181327 -24410 RICHARD 8 TIPTON YAKIMA, Washington 98903 181327-24411 PAUL M & MARGARET G HAYDEN YAKIMA, Washington 98901 -1307 i.�.8132,.7s:24'412: _:JAMES..ID: °.FORSYZ'HE�'- :: . �-��;i _. �. �e!.:_r - : .. .. :.:::... :.r.., . -.. ,.,:.,. :';: s>�:'=YAKS N1A�r. .pfashin t n -. 9, _ ...:,, qa ;:1 rc:..cc -_ -: �.�.; _s:: [Cv '181-3'27'=` 244-`3::- •,• „• AL AN _ 0 89,06�.0317. _ .'<- „,„ '- _ _. _ ” 1 _.r,.. .: ,D E;IC;� &';N CY `S „GRAF .. -,: _ _ . - _F1.. _, - - 'SELAH' ",.Washington, - 98942._,._ 7;, ,�, W81;32-7;1'2 441a ',KG :._INVE MEN - __ _ _ ,,!,,..._ y _ _ ? _ . Z.4 5 m -"^cwt- :i-.r4,ic::` =� = =;; G' T TS - _ - - ,SEL;AH) Washingt,o - 8,94 -0100 7. 'LLi; " ; . T n- `9 i y a ▪ — _ 1'3'2 7 -'2 - '18- 4419” Z O T -u "'JAMES EL I T ,cY _.- - - . , AKIMa` w' ariint ri� -. j i �. ,, ...: =_. a g o _.9 .. ' ., .� _� _:F:-�i f. » s'1^.�.•tit' }� x 181327 - 24420 "• JAMESELLIOTT - `�R. _ -,: YAKIMA, 98902 s 181327 -24427 DONALD E. ET UX RAMSEY YAKIMA, Washington 98908 -2731 .. _. _. _ ...__._ _.. :f _.._ ._.�. _-_.___ . _..- _ _ - ... _ _I' * : :,_ a_ iiii_`- 43'1" ` Y ';:2 ; - , .:�.�_:... _:- ._jai_.:_ �.� - - N � � / . _. _ .. _- r. . �: ��ssvtfu _._�..,.:r: wv 1�,. V .,-. �. c, r:r_u <s .e , ...,, • .: °r':;t_ �:,�__r..�n,.,•r -3 �.- K ".'T'= zr,;-%r' a.. O • . , -iQ "m- ,,.r:;}'t•'�; q - :::,.. 1! j' }, v:u:, .i l , s - 1 �h'� ,i ..l: • 3�r ii:;: <7 �yi '{i7d: !F : %i21.. �s - ` r� .::!: "i .. ...- tV ��? Xi;'. t l : � r. ^i ; ;:; k: I.' - `y j y j ; rPt l `xl'a - >:ir5 @ ? +:'�>'Ci • v� +.t hy - - , ". . i . ' tq: ',?9!; , a#�f' .,. 1 r y ` u I- 1-';' f _ - •.?� - I ; e�,i'•'j' 'r, .'. , ti.ii: °tt� i ; t: :! a >:15- `;ti± f . i„,-::j g. -.0,:V., r:{ �'1 " G ti: �� p ' . i J u' T',� i tiYr'i d -:. ;k� tlF i;E , -; ... - -:,l , - ti 3' . t " � 1 'ri ,r ^ . a 4.`i S Fa WJ : ,'Watt.{ " r ' r ,,�7 d�,;; ,�h. �i }At h � "'INN ii . ar 5, 1 1'� , - e; '.tl:.iu �.zr'Sk�' • .,1h,i., . , lr'i:. ;.f�.w :e� ,l ?i.,� 'h. _ F� k - ' =;41 _ - ;:;r, j ' S:'? j,f.':d�r: aLN41i ,L` �',!'' `i �'c� a!•:, - -_ dH' .s�`i: 1{ ',- a - 4 , :' "ii: !C _ _ ?.�;i ^D� 1i6i''' ';ifx;,.. q Y;d. `i% gig _ ; , .� 5 : r S,�F: . t. :;';.I::; ! -,1 :r :)1:: '. { r 'r [ .J: P . � ; ' .: f Ii, r 1 00 } ',J ;1 J , i t I'. a ' I -'. ���:ii„ I i t' . 1 1 tF I t i . i II I A I IS f A 't I s1r, 3 H m w m , IN :;i4 til'I i, 1 NO0 f O _ -, is , a :. i �M / q W dl ,W , P.4 d'C d',4Wd [.I mmm l Al, - , w w 50 m m l0 w 0 w m 1D m lD m tD 4' -1 P J " :,, H : 09 " +, j r, - - ! ; -, 9 ,.1l ,.'..;�:: •,.,� .'.i ).: w: E '.:;0 ' O :Y 10 50 m 1p ID N AU 50 1p 1p l0 10 N 10 56 b ,.' ii_�' -r. I;.i '''''';W'''''''' I I ,M ,c,:!�.!�`. O O O O,';��;: � ''•j : ' I, ',',.:X'/: : .:�'. m N m N m m m m'm !D m m m m,m m (C, m m m 5'�S:F,: ::,;i ^. ! a .6 �';_ 4 n =' OOrl,00(�NNNNO NNNNNIV VNN NNN N ••,IV,NDOmmmOimmmmmmmN.;O a1, a5mm : t`',` P mmmmm.0mmmmm:Cd.Wgd ' d'V, .P'V'd ' 'Cd@d'mmOim ' ' ;,. fi,f. m m"oimmmmmmmW,m mrn,mmm 5 °` mmmm,'mmmmm0 - G GG 117 r 1 { 1�� mm mmm mm m'mmmmmm'wmmmmmmm 1•t; mm000100.0 :000OOyO'0 0',000 - , 000' 00 0 0' mmmmmmmmmmmmmm,m:I,00 '0 ,,J4J 0 rn0 i00lrnm0!:Oi p! .,, , .i 3i a t is G G = 0 0,i 0 3' �:a� � , o0 ono: 0 00 0 0 . 0 : 00 0 00,0 . 0.0 ' 00000 -00!0 �O���•r - '.'74, m N 'g.m r:0 z c 0!'arA 0 0 0 0 0 0:0'0:0.: K,: G' mm.044 .k'; %Ir FS OO , G:000OG G .- rwo.:�0Tmmtvu'aiInmm vu ;f. H i s f: " , 41-',0 m G G• , G to i G'0 0 b 6 O b m'rn: n'mmtr mm tn G G m m m:m m'm m m m m m m m;m' m m : ',1 . 1 t :'Si . (e. +S -++ to . co m m- rt.G''GIG G G G!F G, C G C , m m i •�I rt rt m .!6 m b m N.m m•N.m G 3 G : a"ro xm'A• 000 r . .�.a �• lm,m 3 3 3 3 'i,,'tF'�' ,ro m m"m,G'm ro ro m' m', c '.dx'.GA.G,C-.".'AAxnil m .'r ' . . mm'3,m•m , m , m mmmm N Nm' , mmmmm . m33'mrt ,; � Z ' - Q ro m'm m m w m'm'm mm m m m fa �m a ;, �:�; 3 3 x Ds ? tk a a s tx t k . e tXa a' a'a a s i �y r o•::'t::; 33-:o '3.: 0000. 0000000000 '0-' 000 , › .000 0 0 0 0 - , ",` H %,,r1r - -_;. ,3 : >: 3.333333 331.33'33333 ":,. ; :• 00 0 0 000 WWW f' N W:;'= s.�'S'Y+N " - ^: F: �;.'; ? s• >+Sf9_ .. .`;. I:1 .; a WW x 0 : o �,.cy HHH 4 ocuo� H ££ 1nn 11 zz00 zzzzzzzzzzz0zazzu �` ''"%r : oc:,r, xxaxxa z x ins:.;:,:, QawaQw,Qzdawwwwwww.w:w� wwwww.w�aQ y ;A ,, y.rn r+'r,Naa a mtnm NlnNVrNlnNVr c9N rr » .:. ';;14 Q r i ( _ _ _ 'ry 444 } `i- W 0 ' - '!I :,i:'. p,, 9:1,9'; w;a : ' w;zz U fa ax aa'- ,,, ,. w f !, .5 t W W W W -, .' . ', H H 1 • ' o: t - C N .• HHHH., �, ., = 7 "NN a 1 T g. :: z x Oz 7Z N ZW Z , , ., 4wwwww 000 i" z Nmh; O XXUU tX ����;a 0 xt>;�����X , ; s Oza.. zuouo 9(7C1UU'C9U'S719U ` t7U'UU'U'U'0. W, I F -[c aa l. 9 ':,.ic ...i• ' ^I r w I �:.h� F W Q . ti r� r1, Lq 1. . - s: , x00 w£ , F. E4 w.z£-£•££x3 £ £E££ ' £;$7•w a '�. { C , O.w'xx xx x 4 . ,2. '.�G' : ' s ` . :ft +Y _ I gryy{ . . IH OZ WW W " W ow QaFCQaQQ! Q'Q aQQQQa . QWW W'W000UU , U.000UUUUU. ,r, M1l: £i zz0zzzz,zz0' . z,,i a, y y y HHHHHHHHHHHHHH 0 xw . ,xf ��a ' : ! w00000. T44.1"wwww]a' 000 ��a ` �ri''' 1 - t` "' F c z ' g z x a a a a q 0 0 ,a ,S .s ' , A 03 , x al of ,z , o , w w w i u w w .x. S ' x. 4 .., , 6 x ' .S E Ww .0 WP ,z x,tl ,a -:^fir , •.:.. 0QrQj .k;.er. ,%,,,,..k -�.y1 3e x xl ' 'ifjlty.�z z a - z;: r': a u_a as a It'; '" - :., °'z a 3 Fy �_' tiaaaa <; h4bhhh,- ph, h,a oa UUU Q'Q QQ , �a��Aw ; ..�. -,.}:, Z WPW- t?C7!9(7c7[ U''U'U'U O0 0 .' ' wv1 Q Z Q : wwwwwwww:;;;; :' '':„ �`t)Ji i, OaPW=: i _ p, , `.: - .G z o>o z WQQ Qa 00000 a a` ., a'a`a'r�aaaa`a ? :; ;: �4. ". -' arLym aW333s.F� 'aaa ar� a QQ a ara�aQr� a a�a a a a x "[r R P 'C1 fJ'00 0'wQ�QQ � "f " 0 0007h0a'WWWWh� X000000XX�`.LXJG,`.GW WOOOH 0 NFF E E W +FF'F,F F N t'i' J ' Nmm mr1M, N50 r r1NM CN ["m010 rl N MCNW.91)V. ,.; r' NMMm'gAMM m i' ' :','E. , .: : ,D '^ ' N M M M 09 M d' N N N N N N N N N 101D 1, 5010 10 50 N N m t` r t` (` (� `'�li•a .: _ ,, :: ., 0 C C v v a C w C a C 'C' , C C C , T 1 4 a? W C C' a ; a 'C v/ v o q , 4, .0 v. 0 Q W C 1, 7. W .o., d' .t •f f l �{ ` C d C'V' V` C C a� C C'C� , r .C' C C d' Y'd' C V' @ d' d' C C'd'.0 C d'' C 1,f d', ytiil'- :^.�5.': (�i (-9 N N N N N N I 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N'N N N N N N N N_I N N N N N N N N -1 N N N N N N 91 1 N N '- I'I M ; +i -', 1 1 1 1 1 I �,. �: I. I I I I ,I I •I. 15 i 1:.1 yj- 51' I I 7, rrr:NN .dF ,ry�2• ; f ' yq ; .. ;.i NNNNNNNNNN NN Y: .1"I` `,,ii a! MN, 0 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NN i . i. ;, AAy,�; ' 0 N % : .0 090909 09 09 09090909MM09090909090909090909090909090909090909090909M M 'M , 1 HHH� Ii '�' 11.• '., n, si HHHHHHHHHH; i' HHHFriHH ' ro MM m HHH ' HH ' MacOMm H:H ' ,i „ ; N r -1 mm'mmmmmmmmm'mm ' mmmHH- 7 HHHH2O immmmmmmmmmmm _;,, ht,l.,i 9.1 :e: W H; : 4 ri H 'i " ri rf ei ri H H H H H H H H H H t!'H H H H H H H �H H� H H H H'rl iH,YI'rt H H H H �i�,l'�:i -''� ri rl • • - • --• - - - -- -- - -- - . - -. - - ri - -,,,---:-- '• - , -:- - ' • - ' "PARCEL ' HAS I C - ::I N F. ORMAT I °NJ. EISTi' ‘.,'..-:? 11 25 12 07. 02 02 ' - -,-: ---,- : - For , List, , u a z 62 -"-,"--',.. -= ,, -. - J--.-'2:1•L*F-::::-;:.Z--: -, . '''... : :: - - , .s.s.'-''?:. '.-...'s'." ' S's ss'. s' ''. s' . - . -:.; ...'-'?",...:',..., ' '''C''' -',.. - Name - Pas , ' .' .s..; Parcel I,. ;,,',..: !.....1 OWne r,s':' : '-- '' "- - ' r- - - " -' ''' -- " ' ''' - ' ' - - - ' ' '' - . - - ''. - - ` ' " - • ' ' - - I 181327 TED ET AL HAUBRICH VANCOUVER, Washington 98664 1 181327-24489 TED ET AL HAUBRICH , VANCOUVER, Washington 98664 _ '.,...'--- .-.-- '."' VANCOUVER'7:APOViligg'ttihq9 as 64 , 181327 24496 TED ET AL HU3RICH 181327 24491 TED ET AL HZUtICJ1 COUVER , N a s ingtoncv 986 4ss's.: J. 181327 2492 ED FT AL WjBRTCH VACOUVER Waoingtor 96664 7 1 - ''''''' - = Z;:: 14.313 2 i-24493.■.,,..s....... P.'ElDi',.ET: AL HATIERICH',,,,„",:. '''...-. . . ..:...,.....- .......-....,',..,.' ... :,,,.. VANCOUVER:, j, 181327-24494 TED ET AL HAUBRICH VANCOUVER, Washington 98664 181327-24501 KAREN A BOTSFORD YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327-24502 MILDRED L CHALLBURG YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327-24503 EDWIN 6 VIOLA SCHLENKER YAKIMA, Washington 98908-3807 181327 - 245 s..... LUCY , ANN, FLETCHER, ',' s s': . • -..".', '-:', ', - - . ' '' • '' '" .. "8 .3:4 '64.::,-:-....':i;::-: -'5r--7,' 181327 24505 JEANETTE P4 CHAPMAN ' 18132,7 '" DOI,ORES MITZEL',:V"...''‘'' • ''''' _,' s': '' , ''.. ' ',' ' .:si ' ''',..-, ' YAKIMA, Wn sliingE.Oir:=9 181327-245Q7.,,,,, I LZ., HARRIS ., 181327-24508 ISAAC J VILLARREAL YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327-31009 LAWRENCE W. BOLTZ YAKIMA, Washington 98908-3922 181327-31010 KRIEGER KEVIN & DEBORAH YAKIMA, Washington 98902 181327-31012 BARBARA J BEAUDRY SURPRISE, Arizona 85374 1 81327 - 31013:;,, • 13ANIEI, . - op,141,ty,,.....,.?,ss: ,.,.... , --.. s.. :",: -2,,,... : :,,t, ' s ., s, ,. -,.,_,.. •.,. , ,, yAKi MA ;3;1; Vla S Iiihg toiiy1;9a9.88'.', 181327 31014 MARSHALL G 889 - 'ss, ' & . KAROL A:SLIGHT ...., ... ,... , ,.. .., yAki RA s hrtbh 181327 31015 ROBERT W ¶4ILSON ;.,, i i id q, YAKIt1A Wsshnton 98908 3912 181327 31P316 BARBARA .2 BKATJDRY SURP5IBE Arazona 85374 181327 JUNIOR W. ET UX SHARP YAKIMA, Washington 98908-3921 181327-31400 TROY E ELLIOTT YAKIMA, Washington 98908-3933 181327-31401 RUSSELL & TERRI WHEELER YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327 PHILIP HARVEY YAKIMA, Washington 98908 " ' ' '''' YAKIMA - ,4 ' , Wskiiii Oil`''' q89013: , ...::■? ,,, -- - - , , ,- .. , 3„..,_-.......z,i,.2.;.1.:',.?=,ci,.. - ,;-",;,:',7-- , .&.--4.;:.f.-- , , 181327 - 31:413:1.'"; I , MI CHAEI:4=E TTh.DX GO LD S mirgsL , ,,,7,-;. • ,,;,.,;,,,. ,,,..::,,, ,...-.. :...-,,:, ,,;•,,, ,.., ,-. : , , ',, _, YAKIMA ';'',. Tela a rid:fig tdri: 8 ao 8ssi.9.3;:ii.,,F.,:,,§iFfs.:::..-2::,6.,-;:-..L.s.;:vglriv:-.,f;i.:3-2,,f,ct,x..3.al,,,,,,,,....-.:feit.igitig,;.-gt..;.:1',..,:i.',.-.tv,114.it, IA 1327.3 ).414".,:.K....:::', 'ROGER Y G',. EI1.7 X .: tout) cIN'- :',-..Z.:: _,. ._,...,:::;;::::-, '.:,. ;.,?_ : ,...,.-:; i::: . yAKimA Was il riiii.g :i)ki,;.2.:Y8A0'8,::::,',Tit''-',"'"?=:::.:'..',.''..'-i;2-•,',,E:.'-.,..,-'ff 181327 , -31415 , 7A.P.' 1 ,.',PPANE ,, KELSEY EY YAKI MA W '''.-,.,, --;.s., ;s1s,s.,-, ,'„ „,;-",._ ."'.,',2 - .,. , .. i ,r's-',". • s;',.'„ ,a: a hi: figtrOn11,9.89 P 8 l'. ,147. 181227-31416 RI CHARD .2. COMSTOCK NI POMO, California 93444-9014 181327-31450 DOUGLAS E & DEPIKA JANKE WAPATO, Washington 98951 181327-31451 DONALD D & NANCY S ASBURY YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327-31452 JOSE BLANCO YAKIMA, Washington 98908-3901 -- - .... --- - - — - -.- --,.---- , - - ...:.--, . i ..---, •-...:_ak a T-. g-tbii , 181327',',31453..i. , CV•: , 7:''.. :DWI GBT,' ',,,:' ET., IJ)0 BILLINGS', ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, -. .. ,,, sis.s.s., , ,=."-ss "5.- -, --..:',.;,- • •,-..-„,-,. . P., _ ' ' , • -.. ..,.;', , ' - 7.' , „,z,.... - ,... - e.s.,..=,..f.,','„, -- 1 - ` - - - ;-T,....,l'i-,-,I 7 F,I8i32c,7„1, DOUGLAS.;:Mf.fiETCPC.--ERIOKSON-,:f.:3.s...7=:;-_,::.i.sAl'..-_,::::-',..,';',..,i,"ir4s,,,H:'"'"'":,..?'-".....YAksIMA '4::"swa-I,WS..t-on'?19.8;9"08......2:47,1".A11:2U-irs,1'60.f.Ri---7;;;,-13;,s,t.F.,:r..sissiM.-:-.:..f.,3s,,s1,==•,-,,`'''-,!".7,fNrs,g9s`kas,-ar-7,i'6 ,3181:32.7,;31485,..„7:;,7..,,'.::::.GEOR,GEfD2I7"'5:ET5.1.7X''.'"S.TENSRUD '..: YAKIMA";t1..shijig ,, 181s 2 p 5 6 •::;::::: - e iriita.z4.2z,-2 v 181327-31457 JAMES J ELVES MARYSVILLE, Washington 98270 181327-31458 ALEJANDRO A & BLANCA E GUZMAN YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327 GEORGE A & LORETTA H KRIEGER YAKIMA, Washington 98908 181327-31496 JOSEPIT P & MARILYN KRIEGER YAKIMA, Washington 98908 5, 81 - 3 2 ,7(4.•33 P4, 9f. 7 . , p : .: 1 ;;: , !: , ;.;::EIRAiDLEYVCiISMITI 4 •! s ' a s hingt h., 9 ..-1,....,.....,,,,.... -,-- . ,._ __,.,--_,..„.... i 1.8J+ 32.17:..4■31Z4,9:a::1:.:;', j.YAKIMA';'s 13q-'4,1 Cr 835327 919,04i; :,^1::‘,..:f JERRY',',11',": DEBRA '?%3', 1... teill :"Z:•: iat b 181327-31506 GEORGE A ET AL KRIEGER YAKIMA, Washington 98908 i 181327-31507 GEORGE A & LORETTA H KRIEGER YAKIMA, Washington 98908 ...,. ' .-,,,,..,..„,• ''....'3,,.' is...,,,,-",,,t.-sss ss_-,,...tss ,',.,,,is,' ss.ss.,--s. ss... IVE?"1 '''g=2 g-i.c.EacEt - - . .T.:Yai.K.1; gi:frtAAtla4 5 ML4. F .:1W :ij5 2 _t , .6Li . IA - -;-trs7gjq 7 - R g:T.Ii.f-I.i7i.a'if4f.qg.':'.6.t..T'&' 4 7,' t— g,....„.i.:At Fk ,- ;. ,, .... , ; -- ' -- Er.Zta -3-1,1 A;. ,, i ,,, : ,,, ; .,;, : 4-1- ' ,. . , :. -,-,,, I. ,-, . 1 . - A.. 34 .i. - 3 -4 . , .. -4 «.. 1 1- .. Aile. ,-,. .. - F:q;:i.itiTWszi:lzagi:Nigi..24.1 2 .re...ar.i . 'Iti.ii. 4 :,:q;::;a::F,i..f.:-.,.'ia._f.S.icAR.-:"..7 - 2- - E.::::.. , ..L.-1.---%:11:- . .. - eiA - I i4 .,'..; • .. . . . _ . 111 .,,,, 4 f 1.1.,';':,i; ,,,.1,...irA • IA; ,-','... 7,,, -.1 i .. ,.'ir,....),,'''Z.),..)i f.'',.',■5',CIF Ir.- •:,;',/,')._,i ' rr4P,I.A.)1,. 7:4):1r),•,,,, ):). '4',:-. '"I•ii.i)). )).', ..„ ;,, v). , '' PPP 1 • 1 ,..,:',),,•' fl )1,- • eel ,4 `1';`' r , '',k■ tv;Itf,■)• )4Tr' 617' 9, ", ''t11:::::...;';'• :.1i' 1: i;s1 ? is es.,..., i'il L - M; es. ,ss.:.,:s4w-,sss fil lii1,:,111. 4,:m q NI. , ,,,,,vie , .. ,,,,44 ;,,,,„1, :,. 7.;..4,:...i14. ,e0Nr4- ..„..,,,..,J -,...f0.111J ,,.......1,:i.,,...!;,,. ''.) 'rr,I - r ! ''9: - -I''')'''''' ,)- ' 14 ' :1 r)1.507,4 - . t , Vs; k ts,n,s s; s: iss'■,:.!.,':', - . .,s s 4.s?. ik-,,,:.:',.:?; :1,,ff,N ':' Ot11)!'').),-` flii-VO TZ .-...., / ". ...) ,.. .,:',' . ...,. .,.,..,.., VA f,0 1 , 1 ,,,„ , ,. ....,,, .. ,. -,.. ', g. - , , , - 0.1.41.,C. '' ,,•,‘.',',, , ?'-ia,,iri 1 I ii 110,1,..; It ''1PliFiliii- w,1„; ,r, ' g',VP j-1,(.9RISIP ,I,'j y.', .=■,1 P. ''.: 1:,q1.■,, , '0:L-q .!z ',.,■ ,,, -4 , ,,,,.111',o,,,..: Pli■ 0 kT..I P,r. ':■IY ,',•.P ,,,-,',.„;-.., ,,,,, , ,t;,.,4. ,,,k,o. , „. , , , f,'„ , •:.,$ , •,:- ,... 0.1 LI '''., ', r'3'... ■ 1.ri';';..,,'2,Q,;, ;40;.1'i.,!,,,:;rj .:01',6.. -.'1, il.:■.: , n■ ,,..e oi'..Y't r:', ..,',.4:t /Lt} ,,V1.,,,.: t:';',; f l get.: (5ity.,.1..1; . -9, 1; i■ r.,, C,;" 1 , ''".ri ,:f.',:“. ;,,,..4..1 i1.,;5? , .,14':.4 . , ,, c,;,:-• I.. ..:41,,,,,%,, ..isrt-r...,:l0 ,,Lt W,Ili,;' . '...Fvt,'', 1 ! ;,1' rv4Mgg P4(Vi'',.. -,,.w.t.:),- ,, . „-- '-'-' ':-.':,1:, !-i;;;;:n-.',,) ,,,,••,,,,,,', ' ' "- • i U)'''),A 1 :,,, 'I ,:,-,1,',,:il,f14."; • )), )114) ,,,,,..• . ,. , , , . - , •-,),)' ),... ,,,..). I),),:•,.„..„,/ , . • • ' '') ' '' ' '... ' ,.: 1,' ,.' 4 ' ' ' ' . irl::■ ; :1 If )),' „ ,,,,. — . , . , .. :•, i'ir.i,,, ,.. ... .„,, ;,'..:; .:'.'.! P. • ?■:-- l' ,1 ,i:1 .;4;,!.,,.: '.r''-,d1iRI r,O., -'. z, F.,1;.i "AO ?:"! ^h;;,,,dt,,,-; f. ,v,'f‘ts,',.' '!!.i,,... ,—...., ;::'is:if."..srs! ssl'1: l 'P.. ■,. ..')1 , ...e. . : ,`'. ,,,•)k) •. II, i'0.,,,,,,,,,,, —,,,,-.),- •"' !.);),I.141" - Af. , :P. l'i is.:i s ::',1"; irs ' s .., -.,,,, V l,V":"..,,ivi '• t :.. f.,., -;.(s....1.,-,.,.A sr..1,_,,,,, '.^....I„ ..,,,-.3.1.-.,,s ,,..r .s..„,.., 4 h , A s„....,,.... 1- 1 4A , , ssit. "J,,, " '.:!;.,...- ,!.!1", '.,;, '''1',-::';':J 1 ;•;i• >b,'(..,t...,„. ,-ie .1.; :F.". ....., ..._.,...- — ,....., _._. -: '..-i - 1:-.. 0.th tl: ■., ■,1::::1,-.1 .5:■ 1 r4: 4,1 '..,.....,.., -,',,,--■:.!: - .ku 1 ;,:-',..-21',4';',',' .. c4■ i ' "':,.: i'..F..41-.qiti C' 1"'..:7.:'.,; ri, r r.,:-.)':' ' ""'' ' r' % , a . 1'.:,!... ip, 1,,,M,,P.gi;e1, ' N s. , ..-1).ii , „ ss';',1' , .',o ..s.'.1`'.,P.J.s cr,.",q51.i.;',,,s;,,,1:-. ...,ss..,..., -ss.• .s.,.;,,,, , :.--ss.. , 3, .17(.. ql 'z'_4 ■? ::: -, ,'-. ,, ';',■ 4 VI tIlil , ,:*,'W_ , ilj ,.;t:1',-.:,. :jc ( as '''',:,41','"f '"..' s. •.;:...4. -,':', N1".:','"'..sr; I e pw,:;1;-, 0 . co ,:,, 0 0 / p:o 0. 0 N ° ° '■,.; 1",!.;.!?..(A: V , 4,11 , 1 ',;';',•?.; ...1%.;r:, a) cr) cop) a) as al a a, as';'.,,,K:,b,,,,...t '. t.4 Iti' ..„, 7, );!:': r-;, ';', L.,:. I ', II! 1 g',g;F.:',f,f`.gg,'g'og ,1, I, , ,:',: . : , ',i.:: ' -. ; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,x ■::-L,;' ic,, ,T.:; ,.4;?.,:ii -.y.... ..,..„,.„, ,... 0 0 1-) 0 ,0 ) 0 0 0 0 ; .', , ,,.L)i,, : .;,., ).'..•';',',I, '.1','''','I ,. ..LI) P-114 01 al 0 .0/1/17tIl 014 Cr) 1,•,::,r,...■,,i ....,, ) ,..,,,,-. ,..:, „1.1/2., , 1 ( g g.rlig;g 0 tn O 00,..::'.1...,','..- ....1.,.-.P.'','..i'” ', ,f.li,- .. tr.-. ,,, .1 ‘•• 3 - 1 ;', T1 A 4:ta ;'.C."4 .ri .d 4 . .-.1,',y).;_.; ',',''',,i,i'! .0, , , ,',1 6 ',,, ,, ;: , _ , ..; rty Lo to iai , co . En - tn 4 al cci, ..,, .! , „:- '''''. --,, , ,',,:',, y-sa " d rti X aa'asias ro u) ns crl-:,..:....., ..- _ , • ,.,,,;-:' .i'..:: -.-',-;;;,,,,:-,-,.., !: ',.:,,,■,,:■4,:',.:,, -':1-'0,,, 7 , 1 ,,,..i. i ,g1 0 .::: 3 ',..; ,,. r6 X X .):•_):„::::.&. ,., .,•„•,),, . ,., ." „, I , ..i , ,' r,`.1'.:',", .V.T1-.-",-.:'4,1 s-s- :.: ',"ii '..,-,':''.'-'.',:c . . , .. ssss.';,':',..:`.'; szi s; sk.: T-..:1:',': - '"'',' ;:.:9::: , „''' ' ,, .1.7, .• . 0 H H ,-1,,,- " I" .''':;': ' ,: : .j.,:'..: ' ,::9-1: ','„-,.•,v',.. l'.1'!'.-1,•,,t.'... ..:,,,•;.:::!;e4; ,-.,1...:!..•;iN .S4 , '.,'',:,' .:'''.,! V. l'rIf ''),..-■.' z 0' ,: T. > . (r) T T >, TI TI..,:r,;');.,•),I,,'„,/,) , ,-',. ,'-',,-,r)',,C.r.t) )71 N. '4, .--....iZ':;1 ',',..''.' :7;1" : • 3(" '. ' 'r - 11 :,..;;;':. -,..:,....,..,, , ,, :.: ;:. 4 ' '......L., .71,.., .;:,I=N '..:,.il: 1,':,,, 1±1'',.■g:',1:4:. .1-42. :,. ,..; ,.:,,;:,::-;-■!-....: ',7..:.:1.,:i'..,:: ': 2 '.." :;.: .. :',-, 11):, •-'; , _, _ ''. :if,' :-,' ,i • ''''i."';'',."‘'''' ". ?A '',' ,, ;' 'I '': :I - ,.; 1'''''! .-."' 7,;':'41- ''.' thi't4' - - • , • i..,0;;i F 3, :h.Vf-'''''',1 ■" ;.,1 :1; . ...t, g.,Hj: ,11.:i ,iifhOeii, :-.' ' 41 .-..I.' ..:.'96nn rt:::".-1 ,r,) U1-1 v.' ...,...- .:s,. :-....,:: -.'...!:'-.1.s's s .:2,.'4'1.,P, , , .. . ,...,.. , , ,.,.Is* s, sk rsK six o s ''.".:,.. ■I':',,:.v,.-s•', .„ . ._, . . . ... ,„... ,_,,., : ..L.11".”:. - ..`1.:.s r:■, '.:. ,,i-10.4: '- s 4. t-. ?.,‘,.,.?..41,14 M :".',-" ta _ •-•:,-_-:._ -i,,iY-:i?,,,': -- 1 'j.• -..."--_ :',-;-,_ , ,7. ri ',.,,",',, '-' - 1 , ) , 1 1 ,..'.',. , 4n i';'-':..: , '4 '..11 T'':.:'';_',...' st-',:,''1'::1':.,',',4,,,. ',...,.1L'Ili'L'' , ,.. ,:,'"i;■;,1.1,.. ? i .VV",,,, -, l 'Al V..' ,- ,..."^": 0 •:;", :_ - ,'::'', . 1' ! ' i ' n ..,-, .a i....;, ''ti ' 'g '41Ni. 1-1 ., ,sds ,1; 'T.-, - .s's; r. ''•' ,. If) :1'. ,;,' '» ' '-"!'....,?.- ' 'J',1k '', A 0 , 1;1 :::1-■:,', ■ ::' '. " ':".. -I,' _.- . •- ' ' ' ' L ' ''''.'" ' 'i? ..? .!' ' ''''' .'''' i'', :IP. g rO Z ' ';;4;;-,g 1 t .. ''':,'..1'.'',.'. :%:..P ‘I (0 . : ' :1 .. 1. E ' 'i' :' .d.',•'::' '. ,,,,•; I•vo, V. •".„: '',:', .. P '':31:): ui:,J;,•,,,. :.,_,,...- ?,11'2,q?.,-. !• a , - H , ...' - z 3 fa Z '..,;:',1.1',..r... ... --,--:,..,,,,,:, ; i , , , A. , . , ..- • R :ill f=1 51 g c4 Y.:: c ..', .:'...-. , f'_',. - ',- ..- :'. ;•:.. , !::X,'' - ., ,,' '''',:: • ''-'-..'''...: ,,,, :',., ...:- n ta , p,14r4 0 ri Z !:.. 4. GI 4 .'s 4141 q Z ca ,..,....,. .,,",,:;'-':.,',' ,,,,I,,,;i,c,,1,,,,■;.,,,,:,.,.,',4,,..:11.;,i,, ,,,,.::::: ', CO i; 1,iii,'... t • ,; :1.'1, 0.1 03 ,-IP:1 4 X X 0 (4,,.'u3-'-,:,.! _ ...,..... D -,' '..- ::,, i„" • '-, M :r . T.: ' ,4; :'-: 2' . s r el.', ,:_.-.. , al Z u040141 P n. 0,,,,- - — ,.i,..a z z:- - - 4 4 , -.1 P.1 4 "-':, '.., g 1-1 :.,i 1 ':: S.:. .:'' ' "::"t;,-, -,,,..--., i. -.?. ' ' " " ''' ' 7: 1.- .'. : ', - ...."' g ' ' 1.--,''',1 ';'''.-:)',..---. ' " P ,,T,i !ff v" IS ' th P4 4 ' , . 0.“4 -, 0,41-44C ;'.11--,,, . „_ ',..f5Y,..'4'. ' til f--‘b 4 4 4 41 ■-1 •:,' :)", ,,,,,,'). ;',.; ,:r; ,,,.,:;2■,,,r,:,"7:', i..r. .1 ,;'. -,.■ '4'1 0:Ei : 0 M Er! LE71 Z Z 0 ,..1 ',:-:.'::'...1‘ ,,,..,,,,, ,x,..1,,,,i--4 - uf,r,. -;... : .1:1 - ., 1'' -' ' i l 2 t'P6 2 2: '4' 2 1-:i.•::'..:,;,.:4 5:,....,.. ::, .?.: :....u,.,5., ,,,, ...,,,..A ..;i.,-,..;:-.,.-i , .4.1.,..,.:,...,,,, . .. .... ., .. , 5i.i4,.,$,;.„ ...., i 5 ... 1;.:. ;',..)),,, : ''', W F'' ..',,,,:';) ), '',,J11% ''' `',))) '',.',,,••-:".•'.., :4,' .••-• •;:-. r''; ;:r , : ,•, 3 ::', ' ;.: : ::!. - e A" i:?' u--.,1.4. - , '''" ''',.;-:■'. 0,, . . . .,.. ...,-. V. r-I IN V' r - a) o P (I tO,:, Z . .;,1. ,.-.,;,,,,,„ ,, l A': '' ''''11,. .c,4 - !,,:t - O' ;Vi mmrnmq 7., .r., ^: ; , i . ,4 ,,,) • i.i d. a a a a a a a . '' . YF f 1 , ?:)!),Vr i'd FT )4, P...,..1... 01 rifICIINCINCANN‘iy1:0..t , ,,„. ,,, . . . , ....,,, :.:;,... i'1 ..... _ I, , ' r.1 40 ,:. '..:: F. ',?..'"',;2■fr "IT" '' 4 ,, :‘r'''. i1; '.1,3,1',R •':' " k; I 1 I ...,_, •,..,...),, ', P- ', F > . c.:.: -', :".Z' 'i',.:%„*ilt' 't'.: (4 1,4. a, ENNNCINNOINCVN,i,,,bij,,.,..r: .. .. . , ..; t' ■•. A ',.F' !:..4.,■'01, V. V.:.it-:. i ..., , 41 , 1 rn rl en pi ri rn rq mr ,,,,,,,,, - ),,,,..1,..',1-0 0' ;:,,, S.I rl ■ rl r r-I I-1 ri 1-1 r-I r-I ,,,. -,..• .,; 'N2 .,,,.. . , :T• 'II: 1.71c1; 4;,' - 1 ; ,,,..,,. i.;■. 10 03 oo ovsso sp !so a, w .3 w .c's..;-,... s.. 1,.: ,,,............f: a■ ri .,''' tal ri ■-.1;4'A 'A A A ■-1 ■-1 r-1. , ,.., "'''''"''''' ::H ,..„ ', — ,,..... . — 401.1010*' oPal't DE PARTMENT _ t COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DE. LOPMENT [ k Planning Division r 4 129 North Second Street ',,C.: HN Yakima, Washington 98901 " 4 Vim; = Phone (509) 575 -6183 0 Fax (509) 575 -6105 NOTICE OF APPLICATION & HEARING DATE: July 5, 2002 TO: Applicant, Adjoining Property Owners, and SEPA Reviewing Agencies FROM: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes and Planning Divisions SUBJECT: Notice of Master Application concerning property located in the vicinity of 4309 W Nob Hill Blvd. UAZO RZ #3 -02, UAZO CL (2) #21 -02, and UAZO EC #11 -02 NOTICE OF APPLICATION The City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic Development has received three related land use applications from Skyland Company, Inc. The first application requests the rezone of approximately 3.16 acres of property from R -3, Multi- Family Residential to SCC, Small Convenience Center. The second application requests Class (2) land use review for the 24 -hour operation of a 79,000 square foot supermarket located within the SCC zoning district and the final application concerns environmental review, a Washington State requirement for any property being considered for rezoning. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is to notify all public and private agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise that the City of Yakima Division of Environmental Planning has been established as the lead agency, pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the above stated project: Primarily because of traffic issues, the City of Yakima is presently inclined towards the issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (MDNS) on this project. REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS Your views on the proposal are welcome. All written comments received by July 25, 2002 will be considered prior to issuing the final recommendation on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, Washington 98901. Filed Hearing Examiner Yakima L X (-I # r ( i7 ^ ` z 7- S - � )---- AL= r . ___ -(3- 111691 .- _...r._._ -._..- 1494 Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This rezone request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, August 22, 2002, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509) 575- 6042.or e-mail at bbenson @ci.yakima.wa.us. Other Permits Required: City building permits Encl.: Narrative, Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Environmental Checklist - SEPA reviewing agencies only.