HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-043 YMC amendments 7-24.010, 7.24.100, 7.24.110, 7.24.150, 7.24.160, 7.60.070, 7.68.250 & repealing 7.24.045AN ORDINANCE
ALTERNATIVE 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2003- 43
relating to public services and utilities; repealing Ordinance No. 2003-29;
amending Sections 7.24.010, 7.24.100, 7.24.110, 7.24.150, 7.24.160,
7.60.070, and 7.68.250 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; repealing
section 7.24.045 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; and establishing
an effective date.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima (City) adopted Ordinance No. 2003-29 on May 20, 2003
relating to the City's irrigation and domestic water utility systems;
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the interests of the
citizens of the City of Yakima would best be served by a repeal of Ordinance No. 2003-29 in its
entirety and a return to the provisions of City ordinances as they existed prior to their
amendment by Ordinance No. 2003-29;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the rates and charges for utility
service that will apply upon the effectiveness of this ordinance are fair, just and reasonable;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 2003-29 is hereby repealed in its entirety and shall be of
no further force or effect after the effective date of this ordinance.
Page 1 of 2 [repealer] •
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this day of
2003.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publication Date: '"1- (-1-'07).
Effective Date: $— 3 " v 3
K:\25739\00027\ET\ET N21XY
Mary Place, Mayor
../SC(
Page 2 of 2 draft - repealer
AN ORDINANCE
ALTERNATIVE 2
ORDINANCE NO. 2003 -
relating to public services and utilities; repealing Ordinance No. 2003-29;
re-enacting portions of Ordinance No. 2003-29; amending Sections
7.24.010, 7.24.100, 7.24.110, 7.24.150, 7.24.160, 7.60.070, and 7.68.250
of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; repealing and reenacting section
7.24.045 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; and establishing an
effective date.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima (City) adopted Ordinance No. 2003-29 on May 20, 2003
relating to the City's irrigation and domestic water utility systems;
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the interests of the
citizens of the City of Yakima would best be served by a repeal of Ordinance No. 2003-29 in its
entirety and a return to the provisions of City ordinances as they existed prior to their
amendment by Ordinance No. 2003-29;
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds and determines that the interests of the
citizens of the City of Yakima would best be served by the Council either making provisions for
the City's irrigation and domestic water utility systems that differ from the provisions of
Ordinance No. 2003-29 between the present time and January 1, 2004; or in the event that no
such alternative provisions are made, re-enacting the provisions of Ordinance No. 2003-29
effective January 1, 2004;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the rates and charges for utility
service that will apply upon repeal of Ordinance No. 2003-29 and subsequently upon the
effectiveness of the rate provisions of this ordinance are fair, just and reasonable;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Page 1 of 4 [Suspension]
Section 1. Ordinance No. 2003-29 is hereby repealed in its entirety and shall be of
no further force or effect after the effective date of this ordinance except as expressly provided
herein.
Section 2. Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of Ordinance No. 2003-29 are hereby
reenacted effective January 1, 2004.
Section 3. Section 7.24.110 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
7.24.110 Effective date for rates.
The rates set forth in YMC Section 7.24.100 shall become effective on March 16, 1999
January 1. 2004 and shall remain in effect until amended by action of the city council.
Section 4. Section 7.68.250 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
7.68.250 Water services charges.
A. Commencing July 1, 2001 January 1, 2004, the charge for domestic water
supplied shall consist of a ready -to -serve charge, aha charge for water consumed, and
a surcharge as follows:
Ready -to- One -Month Two -Month
Serve Period Period
Charges:
Meter size
3/4" $3.65 $3.65
and smaller
1" 4.24 5.65
1-1/2" 7.68 12.80
2" 14.17 26.00
3" 34.64 67.00
4" 54.57 107.00
6" 95.95 190.00
8" 156.55 310.00
Page 2 of 4 draft - Suspension
10" 238.93 475.00
12" 351.40 700.00
Following is a tabulation of applicable rates per UOC:
UOC Rate Per UOC
0--1220 1.13
13 20 1.13
21--250 1.00
251 500and above 0.75
Over 500 9-75
The surcharge shall be $9.63 per connection for each two-month period. or $4.82
for any one-month period. for all customers of domestic water service from July 1, 2003
through July 1, 2023.
B. The "one-month period" is defined as nay any period of time from one day up to
and including one month and fourteen days, and the "two-month period" is defined as any
period of time from one month and fifteen days to two months and fourteen days.
Minimum ready -to -serve and consumption charges for water supplied outside the
city shall be computed by multiplying the applicable rate above by one and one-half.
C. Home Kidney Dialysis. A residential customer who undergoes kidney dialysis at
his or her home, or whose home is also the home of a different person who undergoes
home kidney dialysis, shall not be required to pay utility charges for domestic water
service or sewer service for the quantity of water that is necessary for the home dialysis.
In order to be excused from utility charges under this subsection, the residential customer
must present annually to the director of finance and budget or their designee written
documentation from a recognized kidney dialysis center certifying that the person requires
dialysis and the quantity of water needed for that person's dialysis.
Page 3 of 4 draft - Suspension
Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
2003.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this _ day of
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publication Date:
Effective Date:
K \25739 \ 00027NET \ ET N21 XZ
Mary Place, Mayor
Page 4 of 4 draft - Suspension
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 1 0
For Meeting of 7/1/03
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Legislation re Public Services and Utilities Providing for
the Conversion of the General 308 Irrigation System to Domestic Irrigation Service
A. Repeal Ordinance #2003-29
B. Suspend Ordinance #2003-29
SUBMITTED BY: Glenn Rice, Assistant City Ma 4"!
CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Glenn Rice/575-6040
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: The Council requested legislation to repeal the irrigation
ordinance at its meeting on June 24. Legal Counsel has prepared two options to
accomplish this objective and has prepared a more detailed legal opinion on these
choices.
OPTION A --Repeal only. The first draft ordinance would simply repeal Ordinance No.
2003-29 in its entirety. The repeal would be effective 30 days from publication of this
ordinance. Rate changes made by Ordinance No. 2003-29 would be in effect from July
1, 2003 until the effective date of the repealer ordinance.
OPTION B --Repeal, reenact, suspend. The second draft ordinance would likewise
repeal Ordinance No. 2003-29 in its entirety. Further, it would reenact Ordinance No.
2003-29 effective January 1, 2004, providing the Council with time to make alternative
provisions for the water/irrigation system should it wish to do so.
Resolution Ordinance Contract Other (Misc. Information)
Funding Source
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL -`�; ��-
city Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No recommendation—this is a council policy issue.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
COUNCIL ACTION: Ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2003-43
PrestonlGateslEllis LLP
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Yakima
Elizabeth Thomas
June 26, 2003
Draft Ordinances to Repeal, or Suspend, Irrigation Ordinance
Introduction
The Council adopted Ordinance No. 2003-29 on May 20, 2003, relating to the water/irrigation
system. Ordinance No. 2003-29 became effective 30 days after its passage, approval and
publication, except for the rate provisions, which will become effective on July 1, 2003 pursuant
to Sections 5 and 10 of Ordinance No. 2003-29. We assume Ordinance No. 2003-29 was
published on May 23, and accordingly became effective on June 22, 2003.
We understand that the Council may wish to consider repealing or perhaps suspending
Ordinance No. 2003-29. The first enclosed draft ordinance would simply repeal Ordinance No.
2003-29. The second enclosed draft ordinance would essentially suspend Ordinance No. 2003-
29 until January 1, 2004, providing the Council with time to make alternative provisions for the
water/irrigation system should it wish to do so.
Repealer Ordinance
This ordinance would repeal Ordinance No. 2003-29 effective 30 days from its passage, approval
and publication. At that time (i.e., approximately August 3, 2003), the ordinances would revert
to their status immediately prior to passage of Ordinance No. 2003-29.
From a practical standpoint, the only portion of Ordinance No. 2003-29 that would have to be
implemented between the present and the effective date of the repealer ordinance would be the
rate provisions that are to take effect on July 1, 2003. Under the filed rate doctrine, a municipal
utility must charge whatever rates are applicable to customers at a particular time. See Housing
Authority of King County v. Northwest Lake Washington Sewer and Water District, 56 Wn. App.
589 (Div. 1, 1990). However, as an administrative matter, in order to avoid making a set of rate
changes at the beginning of July and then undoing the rate changes at the beginning of August, it
would probably be acceptable for the City to use a deferral account to track rates applicable to ,
A LAW FIRM ( A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES
925 FOURTH AVENUE SUITE 2900 SEATTLE, WA 98104.1158 TEL: (206) 623.7580 FAX: {206} 623-7022 WWW.PRESTONGATES.COM
Anchorage Coeur d'Alene Hong Kong Orange County Portland San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC
MEMORANDUM
June 26, 2003
Page 2
different customer classes during July and August, and to collect the difference between current
rates and July -August rates in conjunction with the City's next rate change.
Repealer -Suspension Ordinance
The second ordinance is similar to the first in that it would repeal Ordinance No. 2003-29
effective 30 days from publication. At that time (e.g. August 3, 2003), the ordinances would
revert to their status immediately prior to passage of Ordinance No. 2003-29. However, if the
Council did not enact other legislation relating to options for the water/irrigation system by the
end of 2003, this ordinance would also re-enact the substance of Ordinance No. 2003-29 with an
effective date of January 1, 2004.
The Council might want to consider this ordinance if it wished to maintain the policies reflected
in Ordinance No. 2003-29 as a default position or to limit the time period for further
consideration. (Under the Acquavella settlement, water rights available at Nelson drop
substantially 10 years from the Court's order approving the settlement, providing an incentive to
complete construction on any rebuild option prior to that time.) Through this ordinance, the
Council could use the next six months for further information gathering and evaluation, but if it
decided it did not want to change the policy direction established by Ordinance No. 2003-29, it
would not have to take any further action.
As with the simple repealer ordinance, under the repealer -suspension ordinance, the new rates
established by Ordinance No. 2003-29 would, as a legal matter, be effective from July 1 through
August 3, 2003, but not from August 4 — December 31, 2003. Again, however, as an
administrative matter, if the City wished to avoid multiple rate changes, the difference in rates
due for the month of July could probably be tracked through a deferral account and later
recovered from appropriate customer classes.
ET:et
cc: Richard A. Zais, Jr.
Ray Paolella
Dave Brown
Dueane Calvin
Nancy Neraas
K:\25739\00027\ET\ET M21Y0