Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/31/1978 Business Meeting JULY 31, 1978 The City Council met in session on this date at 1:30 PM in the Council . Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Council members present were Mayor Betty L. Edmondson, Henry Beauchamp, Lynn Buchanan, Don Hinman, Nadine Lee, Jack Sparling and Gordon Wonder. Councilman Wonder requested information on Planning and Community Development projects, such as the UDAG project. Councilman Beauchamp inquired about the status of the update report on the self-insurance plan. City Manager Eastman reported that that report is just about completed. Council member Lee inquired about the lighting on South 48th Avenue between Nob Hill Blvd. and Randall Park. City Manager Eastman reported that Council had looked at the street lighting plan three times in the last year and were going to discuss it at their retreat, but did not have time to do so. Mayor Edmondson inquired about the Larson Garage Report. City Manager Eastman reported that that report and the report on the intersection of 4th and "I" are completed, but were not included on today's agenda because of its length. Councilman Wonder inquired about the lack of insurance coverage for the Auxiliary Police while they are on duty. City Manager Eastman stated he would check on the. matter. It was MOVED by Sperling, seconded by Wonder to move into Executive Session to discuss land acquisition and legal matters: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Wonder voting aye by voice vote. At 3:00 PM, the Council members commenced the regular meeting, Mayor Edmondson presiding, Council members Beauchamp', Buchanan, Hinman, Lee, Sparling and Wonder, and City Manager Eastman and City Attorney Andrews present on roll call. The Invocation was given by Councilman Buchanan. Mayor Edmondson referred to the items placed on the Consent Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or deletions from either Council members or citizens present. Councilman Beauchamp requested that item #20 be removed fram the Consent Agenda; Council member Lee requested that item #21 be removed; Council member Wonder requested that item #17 be removed; and Mayor Edmondson requested that item #7 be removed from the Consent Agenda. It was the general consensus of the Council that the deletion of items #20, #21, #17 and #7, as requested, be made. The City Clerk then read the Consent Agenda items. It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Hinman that the Consent Agenda, as read, be passed: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Wonder voting aye on roll call. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk (*) indicate items on the Consent Agenda to be handled under one motion without further discussion.) Mayor Edmondson stated that the spelling of John Klingele's name was incorrect in the minutes of the July 17, 1978 meeting and Larry Robinson's name was listed as Robertson and should be corrected. It was MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Lee that the minutes of July 17, 1978, as amended and July 24, 1978 as presented, having been duly certified accurate by two Council members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly, be approved: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Wonder voting aye by voice vote. This being the time fixed for the hearing on the rezone application filed by Cornelis Brandt, M.D., for property located at No. 52nd Avenue between Summitview and Chestnut, and no one present wishing to speak to this matter, it was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Beauchamp that Ordinance No. 2194, accepting the recommendation of the Planning Commission and zoning the property R-1, be passed: carried, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling, Wonder and Beauchamp voting aye on roll call. ORDINANCE NO. 2194, AN ORDINANCE accepting the recommendation of the Planning Commission and rezoning property at No. 52nd Avenue between Summitview and Chestnut in the City of Yakima from R-4, Suburban Residential Zone, to R-1, Single-Family Zone. JULY 31, 1978 This being the time fixed for the hearing on the Glen Park West Preliminary Plat, located at No. 52nd Avenue between Summitview and Chestnut, Council member Lee inquired if Dr. Brandt agreed to the conditions set forth by the Planning Commission. Dr. Brandt stated that he does agree to follow those conditions. It was then MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Hinman that the Glen Park West Preliminary Plat be accepted with the eight conditions proposed, as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff: carried, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling, Wonder, Beauchamp and Buchanan voting aye on roll call. It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Sperling that the Resolution providing for the submittal to the electors of the City of Yakima, at a special election to be held in conjunction with the State Primary Election to be held on September 19, 1978, as a proposition as to whether an ordinance II/ amendment proposed by initiative petition and relating to refuse collection shall be enacted or rejected as a law of the City of Yakima, be passed. City Attorney Andrews reviewed the alternatives given to Council by the City Charter as being to either enact the ordinance or make arrangements to submit the proposition to the electorate. He stated that in this instance, Council has a third alternative, which would be to not accept the petition because it does not conform to State Law. Councilman Beauchamp expressed concern about the way the petition was initiated and the way the signatures were gathered. Councilman Hinman expressed concern about the invalidity of the petition. Council member Lee stated that although she hopes the issue will be defeated, she believes the citizens should have the opportunity to vote on it. Councilman Wonder stated that if the petition is properly submitted to the City, then it should be submitted to the people. He also stated that the hardworking employees should be protected. Council members Buchanan and Sperling both stated that if enough people had signed the petition, then it should be submitted to them to vote on it. Richard Wiehl, Attorney representing Eichler Disposal, stated that the legality of the petition is only a technicality and when approximately 3500 people sign the petition, that issue should be placed on the ballot. He also explained the reason Eichler initiated the petition. He stated that Eichler is prepared to go to Court on this matter. Rev. Horace Gholston, 515 So. 6th Avenue, expressed concern about present refuse workers and their 7ights. The question was_called for the vote on the motion: . Eirman.,, Inibnder,Beauchamp and Edmondson voting nay on roll call. Lee, Sperling and Buchanan voting aye. The motion failed for lack of a majority vote. Councilman Wonder stated he would like a Study Session on the possibility of presenting an ordinance to the people for a method of allowing the City workers to collect in a commercial classification as well as residential classification. It was the general consensus of the Council to have a study session on whether we can change the ordinance or whether it would be feasible for the City to enter into commercial refuse pickup. Bob Knight, Transit Manager, gave a presentation on the history of the Yakima City Lines as part of the presentation for proposals for route modifications and service hour extensions. He reviewed with Council the Transit consultant's report on objectives for improvements over a five year schedule which would include route modifications, extended hours of II/ service, purchase of new buses which can accommodate the handicapped, bus shelters and bus stop signs. Councilman Hinman inquired if the City had other funds or methods of funding available other than UMTA funds. Mr. Knight stated that the City can impose a .003% sales tax for funding. Councilman Wonder questioned the amount of money received from fares, household tax and UMTA. Mr. Knight stated that the amount of the UMTA grant applied for in 1978 was $205,000, and reported on the 1978 budgeted revenues, which total $612,576. He proposed that the Tieton-Nob Hill Routes be split into two separate routes. He also reported that the consultant suggested a 16 hour day which would cost an additional $20,000 this year. He stated that overtime costs his department approximately $2500 each month. Councilman Wonder expressed concern about the amount of overtime paid to the drivers to haul five or six people around, and requested information on how many people are on the last bus route. Mayor Edmondson stated that last week, William Strole, 104 N. 55th Avenue, had come to the meeting to speak to this matter and left a note stating that he is in favor of Council extending the bus service to late evening hours and on Sundays. After further discussion, it was the general consensus to continue this for approximately one week to obtain additional information. 48 JULY 31, 1978 It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Beauchamp that Resolution No. D-3932, authorizing the filing of an application with the Department of Transportation, for a grant under the Urban Mass Transportation Act: carried, Hinman, Lee, Sparling, Wonder, Beauchamp, Buchanan and Edmondson voting aye on roll call. RESOLUTION NO. D-3932, A RESOLUTION authorizing the filing of an application with the Department of Transportation, United States of America, for a grant under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. Mayor Edmondson stated that she had received a letter from Mattie White stating she is in favor of the major modification application filed by Safeway; and a letter from Richard B. Marshall, No. 71st Avenue, stating he is against the major modification. City Attorney Andrews stated that legislation had not been prepared in advance, but according to Council's ' instructions, legislation will be prepared for next week that will consist of a brief recital of the reasons behind Council's decision. It was MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Lee to accept the recammendation of the Yakima Planning Commission to deny the application for the major modification filed by Safeway, Inc., and have the proper legislation prepared. Councilman Hinman stated that it is not good planning to have two shopping centers across the street from each other, besides the noise and intrusions on the residential area. Council member Lee stated that she was concerned about the economic and aesthetic impact upon that area and also the noise and traffic. Councilman Wonder stated that Council should only be addressing the modification of the original plan which was already approved; the modification is less dense and has less traffic. He stated it is a better plan. Mayor Edmondson stated she is opposed to the major modification, as it is a traffic and noise generator. Councilman Sparling stated that he will vote to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The question was called for the vote on the motion: carried, Lee, Sparling, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson and Hinman voting aye on roll call. Wonder voting nay. The Council next discussed the $40,000 cost overrun on the airport runway overlay project. Judy Sheridan, Director of Transportation, stated that originally the project required a closure of the airport for approximately 30 days in order for the work to be done. The project was done in two phases, which only required a 3 day closure of the airport, but also increased the cost for the project from an administrative and engineering standpoint. Council member Lee expressed concern about the overrun on the contract which is supposed to be done at a certain cost to the City. Councilman Wonder expressed concern that Council was not made aware that the contract was changed. Preston Shepherd, Preston Shepherd and Associates, reported that the airport was closed for 3 days while finishing work was being done on the runway, as required by FAA. The rest of the time, the airport remained open for morning and evening flights,-which enabled the carriers to have an income of $328,000. City Manager 'Eastman stated that under the original contract, the overlay was going to be done in one phase, Which would necessitate closing the airport from 3 to 4 weeks in OeLober. However, due the weather, FAA required us to do one overlay then and two more in the Spring. Councilman Wonder stated that someone must have authorized the additional work. Mr. Shepherd stated that he was not authorized by Mr. Eastman to do the additional work, but did want to do the: job properly. He did state that he met with Mr. Eakin, Mr. Postman and Mrs. Sheridan in conference. He stated that since he did not have a figure on the cost overrun, he did not want to came to Council. He stated that FAA has gone over the figures for the additional cost and they don't see any problems with it. He stated that the amount of the overrun is a matter of taking the number of hours we have put into the project, and copies of the billing are available. Councilman Hinman stated he would like to see the figures of the actual overrun and what additional service was required because of the change. He stated that he does not believe Preston Shepherd should be paid if he underbid the job, but should be paid for additional work because the contract was changed. Councilman Buchanan asked how much additional revenue the City received during that time. Mr. Shepherd stated that the City received $4400 in landing fees, which amounts to more than the City's share of the engineer's fee. It was the general consensus of the Council to continue this item for one week in order to obtain additional information on the breakdown of the figures. JULY 31, 1978 It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Hinman, that Resolution No. D-3933, approving the Sanitary Sewer Capital Cost Recovery Charge Agreement, be passed. Herb Mayer, City Engineer, explained that this form is an agreement that prospective customers will be asked to sign before they hookup to the sewer. City Manager Eastman stated that those customers who have signed an outside utility agreement will be asked to sign this agreement and it will be attached to the outside utility agreement for signature from those who have not signed outside utility agreements. Mr. Mayer stated that all the prospective customers have been informed that there will be a capital recovery cost charge. He reported that a preliminary estimate would be 1.93' per sq. ft. in the West Valley area and .82 per sq. ft. in the other areas. After further discussion, the question was called for a vote on the notion: carried, Sparling, Wonder, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, and Lee voting aye on roll call. II/ RESOLUTION NO. D-3933, A RESOLUTION approving a."Sanitary Sewer Capital Cost Recovery Charge Payment Agreement" form; authorizing the implementation of such forms and authorizing their execution by the City Manager and the City Clerk of the City of Yakima. It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Hinman that the report of the City Engineer dated July 25, 1978, with respect to the completion of the work on Public Works Contract - Sewer Sealing and Relining, Contract No. 1, performed by Gelco Grouting Services, be approved, the work be accepted and payment of the final estimates as therein set forth is hereby authorized: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling and Wonder voting aye on roll call. Councilman Wonder reported that he had gone by the piece of property for which abatement of fire hazards had been requested. He asked if the City could charge them for removing weeds on the parking strip. City Attorney Andrews stated that the City can, as it is a right-of-way dedicated to the City. The City owns that as an easement and until the City exercises those easement rights, the property owner has beneficial occupancy and control and has responsibility for maintaining that property. Councilman Wonder then asked why the neighboring property was not required to abate their weeds also. Fire Chief Carroll stated that this program is administered on a complaint basis only. It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Sparling that the Resolution authorizing abatement of fire hazard on private property, be passed: carried, Wonder, Beauchamp, Hinman, and Sparling voting nay on roll call. Buchanan, Lee and Edmondson voting aye. The notion failed for want of a majority vote. It was MOVED by Lee, seconded by Hinman that the Outside Utility Request for Timothy Melhorn, for water for property located along Reservoir Road, be approved: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling and Wonder voting aye on roll call. It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Beauchamp that Ordinance No. 2195, amending the parade permit ordinance, be passed. Councilman Wonder questioned the fact that the Police Chief has the right to exercise II/ authority to grant a variance to the ordinance, stating he feels only Council should have that right. City Attorney Andrews stated that it is the same discretion the Police Chief has always had. He further stated that this Ordinance has been amended recently to conform with other legislation regarding people's rights of assembly. The question was called for a vote on the notion: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling and Wonder vote aye on roll call. ORDINANCE NO. 2195, AN ORDINANCE relating to traffic control; specifying standards for issuance or denial of parade permits; amending subsection 9.50.810 E of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; and declaring an emergency. Councilman Beauchamp expressed concern about the foreclosure proceedings on the irrigation maintenance assessments and inquired about the timeframe involved before the foreclosure proceedings begin. He also urged the slowest possible enforcement system to make this happen. Walt Chappel, City Treasurer, stated that there has been a considerable amount of time involved where we have attempted to collect the money. He reported that on an annual basis, there are four notices directed to the owners. JULY 31, 1978 After a two year delinquency, the foreclosure notice is sent just prior to the end of the year and the next year they are given a 30 day notice, and if the Legal Department feels that it is proper to begin foreclosure, they send a notice also. The two year period has already expired on all of these. He also stated that in some cases, one or two payments will prevent the foreclosure. Councilman Beauchamp inquired if a person will have some time before it is foreclosed. City Attorney Andrews reported that it has to be filed with the court and they will be notified and there is a period of time when payment can be made. He also stated that the person who owns the property has one year after the sale of that property to redeem it. It was MOVED by Sparling, seconded by Buchanan that Ordinance No. 2196, directing foreclosure proceedings on irrigation maintenance assessments, be passed: carried, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling, Wonder and Beauchamp voting aye on roll call. ORDINANCE NO. 2196, AN ORDINANCE directing the City Attorney of the City of Yakima to institute foreclosure proceedings on certain property for which irrigation maintenance assessments are unpaid and delinquent. City Manager Eastman explained that we have been unable to collect the money fran the County for their assessment on the Yakima Valley Regional Library property for improvements in LID No. 1001. He stated that there are two Library Boards involved and we hope to have the problem of collection resolved at budget time. The loss is one year's interest. The proposed ordinance is to amend the original ordinance to provide for the unpaid assessment of $10,655 and a local improvement installment note. It was NBJVED by Himnan, seconded by Buchanan, that Ordinance No. 2197, fixing the time of delinquency of installments of assessments in L.I.D. No. 1001, and providing for the issuance of bonds, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling, Wonder, Beauchamp and Buchanan voting aye on roll call. ORDINANCE NO. 2197, AN ORDINANCE fixing the time of the delinquency of installments of assessments levied for the payment of the cost of the improvements in Local Improvement District No. 1001, and providing for the issuance of bonds with coupons attached for the payment of the unpaid portion thereof; and repealing City of Yakima Ordinance No. 2179, dated May 8, 1978. It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Hinman that Ordinance No. 2198, defining OPTICOM and providing for issuance of license, be passed. Council member Lee inquired who would apply for these licenses. Fire Chief Carroll stated that fire protection districts are interested. He stated that fire protection districts, ambulance and police could apply. Councilman Hinman inquired if buses could apply. Fire Chief Carroll reported that they could apply, however, the ordinance pertains only to emergency vehicles. The question was called for a vote on the motion: carried, Hinman, Lee, Sparling, Wonder, Beauchamp, Buchanan and Edmondson voting aye on roll call. ORDINANCE NO. 2198, AN ORDINANCE relating to fire; defining OPTICOM; prohibiting its use except by license; setting standards for the issuance of a license; and enacting Section 10.05.150 as a new section of the City of Yakima Municipal Code. Council members discussed the request from the Visitors and Convention Bureau regarding the outside catering by M & M Catering.. Mayor Edmondson stated that she had a note from June's Catering stating she is against than being able to use the Center for outside catering. Councilman Wonder stated that M & M Catering has expended a large stmt of money in capital outlay and has not had enough catering days that was promised. Mayor Edmondson stated she would like additional information, i.e., a statement from M & M Catering and. the Visitors and Convention Bureau. It was the general consensus of the Council to continue this item until additional information has been received. Mayor Edmondson stated there are two vacancies on the Airport Advisory Commission — Jim Smith, recently appointed, informed Council that he is unable to accept the appointment; and Frank LeCocq, M.D., whose term expired. Mayor Edmondson informed Council that Jim Tonkin called her to state that he is interested in serving on that Commission. He lives outside the City and has County approval. It was MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Wonder to appoint Jim Tonkin to fill the vacancy created by JULY 31, 1978 Frank LeCocq's termination: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Wonder voting aye by voice vote. Mayor Edmondson stated she feels that this fills the Council's commitment to have one County Commission mimes on the Board. Council member Lee submitted the name of Dr. D. K. Williams to be considered for appointment. After discussion, it was the general consensus of the Council to continue this discussion to next week's study session. City Manager Eastman stated there are three off - agenda items which need Council's attention. Mr. Eastman explained the memo of July 28, 1978, which gives the cost breakdown of the Wastewater Program. He stated that there is an urgency in submitting an application for an increase of the Step III Grant as there are a number of projects throughout the State where the costs have overrun the estimate and they are applying to EDA requesting additional funds. The application would be to request an increase of local share from $6.5 million, Phase I to $9.3 million. Councilman Wonder expressed concern about the increase being about 50% higher than was estimated. Alan Bushley, R. W. Beck, stated that the original figure of $16.3 million was prepared following EPA guidelines, 1975 price levels. We are now looking at $25 million construction figure, based on an estimate prepared last year. The West Valley Interceptor Sewer came in under budget. He stated that inflation and some changes in requirements accounts for about $1 million. It was MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Beauchamp that Resolution No. D -3935, authorizing submittal of an application for increase of Step III grant for construction of Wastewater Treatment Plant, Phase I, be passed: carried, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Beauchamp voting aye on roll call. Wonder voting nay. RESOLUTION NO. D -3935, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City Manager of the City of Yakima to apply for State and Federal grant increases to finance the construction of the Yakima Area Wastewater Facilities. City Manager Eastman reported that a farmer in Ellensburg brought to our attention the fact that the City has some baling wire at the Sewage Treatment Plan which is surplus. It is recommended by the Purchasing Agent that the City dispose of this baling wire by sealed bid. It was MOVED by Buchanan, seconded by Wonder that Resolution No. D -3936, authorizing the sale of surplus baling wire by sealed bids, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling, Wonder, Beauchamp and Buchanan voting aye on roll call. City Manager Eastman reported that the Police Auction held last Saturday grossed $6,000. RESOLUTION NO. D -3936, A RESOLUTION authorizing the sale of surplus personal property owned by the City. Carol Darby, Director of Community Development, reported on the value of the property around the Yakima Center property as being anywhere from $1.57 a sq. ft. to $5.71 a sq. ft. based on the 1976 figures. She stated that the Hettich property settled for $35,000 which is approximately $5.00 a sq. ft. She stated that the Chamber of Commerce property is valued at $3.07 a sq. ft. for one parcel of property and $3.29 a sq. ft. for the other parcel. It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Hinman that Resolution No. D -3937, authorizing the exchange of real property between the City of Yakima and the Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce, be passed: carried, Hinman, Lee, Sperling, Wonder, Beauchamp, Buchanan, and Edmondson voting aye on roll call. Councilman Wonder stated that the advantage to the City is that we will gain a piece of property that abuts a piece of property across the alley which we may need to vacate some day to increase our land for parking purposes. RESOLUTICN NO. D -3937, A RESOLUTION authorizing the exchange of real property between the City of Yakima and the Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce. Fire Chief Ed Carroll clarified Council's past policy concerning weed burning. He reviewed the initiation of the weed abatement program which was prompted by the number of plaints received. At budget time in 1976, a policy decision was made to handle the weed problem on a complaint call basis rather than have the Fire Department survey the City and then research records to identify the owners of the property. It was MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Beauchamp to reconsider Council's previous decision on the one agenda item and go ahead and have the weed abatement take 52 JULY 31, 1978 place: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee and Sparling voting aye by voice vote. Wonder voting nay. It was then MOVED by Lee, seconded by Hinman that Resolution No. D-3934, authorizing abatement of fire hazards on certain property, be passed: carried, Lee, Sparling, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, and Hinman voting aye on roll call. Wonder voting nay. Councilman Wonder stated that he is complaining about the fire hazards on the properties adjacent to this property. Fire Chief Carroll stated that his department will take action. He further stated that they do not issue abatement unless a fire hazard exists. RESOLUTION NO. D-3934, A RESOLUTION requiring the abatement of fire hazards on certain property, directing notice.F-to property owners to abate such hazards and, in the alternative, authorizing abatement by the Fire Marshal. City Attorney Andrews stated that earlier, while Council was in session, Richard Wiehl, Attorney for Eichler, appeared before the Judge and obtained a Writ of Mandamus which requires the City Attorney to appear before the Judge on Thursday, in response to the Petition in order to discuss whether the Judge should order the City Council to do one or the other alternatives as given in the City Charter. Mr. Andrews stated that he indicated to Mr. Wiehl that he would give the Writ of Mandamus to each Council member because Council is in session. He stated that he had further discussion with Mr. Wiehl which needs to be discussed in Executive Session. It was then MOVED by Beauchamp, seconded by Hinman to move into Executive Session to discuss pending litigation: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sparling and Wonder voting aye by voice vote. Following the Executive Session, Councilman Wonder questioned the rental of Larson Garage space to Rosetta Kintner, as he believes we were not going to rent any space out at this time. City Manager Eastman reported that staff was instructed like that. He further stated that there is a 30 day notice on the rental agreement. There being no further business to come before the Council, it was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Buchanan that this meeting be adjourned at the hour of 7:30 PM: carried, Beauchamp, Buchanan, Edmondson, Hinman, Lee, Sperling and Wonder voting aye by ce vote. 0 READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY DATE COUNCILMAN (72ui sr DATE*7 er ATTEST: f • - A ir /IV - .05 Ao /JF A! • Y.Y0R Inadvertently omitted: Items of Information supplied to Council were: Letter from Mayor Rowland of Selah 7-24-78; Letter from McCaw Communications Companies 6-28-78; Letter from Robert G. Atwood, MD,MPH 7-27-78; Letter fiom Mr. & Mrs. L. J. Records I/ 7-13-78; Memo from Transportation Director re Equipment Replacement Criteria 7-26-78; and Memo from Finance & Budget Director re Rosetta Kintner 7-26-78.