HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/2010 07 Barge-Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District Design Review Guidelines and Certificate of Appropriateness BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
• YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 7
For Meeting of October 5, 2010
ITEM TITLE Public Hearing to Consider Resolution Adopting Design Review Guidelines and
Certificate of Appropriateness for Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District
SUBMITTED BY Michael A. Morales
Director of Community and Economic Development
CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE Vaughn McBride, Associate Planner (576 -6315)
SUMMARY EXPLANATION
The purpose of historic preservation design review guidelines is to preserve the historic integrity
of properties individually listed on the Yakima Register of Historic Places, contributing or non-
contributing properties of historic districts listed on the Yakima Register of Historic Places, state
register, and National Register of Historic Places These guidelines are intended to encourage
compatible development and discourage introduction of incompatible buildings and property
design to our historic resources
A Certificate of Appropriateness provides official notice that the Yakima Historic Preservation
Commission (Commission) has approved proposed exterior changes, alterations, or new
construction for the property or properties within historic districts listed on the Yakima Register
• of Historic Places All guidelines and decisions concerning alterations, additions and
rehabilitations to historic structures and properties are based on the Secretary of Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation
On May 28, 2009 the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously approved the nomination
of the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood as a residential historic district; the city's first. Following a
joint public meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission and city's Neighborhood
Development Committee on August 25, 2010 a unanimous recommendation for approval was
issued for the proposed design guidelines and Certificate of Appropriateness (attached) for the
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District. Findings of Fact, dated August 30, 2010
attached
Resolution X Ordinance Contract _ Other Findings of Fact, BCNA Design Review
Guidelines, Certificate of Appropriateness, District Map
Funding Source
APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL.
ity Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution to approve Design Review Guidelines &
Certificate of Appropriateness process
• BOARD RECOMMENDATION Historic Preservation Commission and city Neighborhood
Development Committee recommended approval of the Design Guidelines on August 25, 2010
COUNCIL ACTION
rn
CITY OF YAKIMA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Minutes for Meeting of August 25, 2010
Cal/ to Order
Chairperson Jenifer Wilde- McMurtrie called the meeting to order at
approximately 5 35pm
A. Roll Call
Present: Byron Gumz •Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe
Mann • Karl Pasten • Greg Rainka, • Jenifer Wilde
McMurtrie
Absent. Scott Irons (unexcused)
Staff Vaughn McBride, Historic Preservation Liaison
Guests City Neighborhood Development Committee
Councilpersons Dave Ettle, Cathy Coffee, B/l/ Lover
// Adoption of Minutes - Minutes of the June 23, 2010 and July 25, 2010 were
approved, adopted as read (Motion approve Commissioner Mann, Seconded
By Commissioner Kenmotsu) Motion approved by 6 -0 vote
III New Business
A. Welcome New Commissioners
4110
Commission Members 1
Scott Irons • Byron Gumz • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten • Greg Rainka
Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie
New Commissioner Greg Rainka was greeted and welcomed onto
Commission Commissioner Rainka moved here from Sacramento,
California area, and now works as an Environmental Consultant for Fulcrum
Environmental Past experience has included `free - lance' historic
preservation work, and graduate studies at the University of Chicago
gaining a graduate degree in Preservation Planning & Design
B BCNA Guidelines Approval
The latest version of the proposed design review guidelines for the Barge -
Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District was reviewed and discussed
among Historic Preservation Commission members and City of Yakima
Neighborhood Development Committee members
Gary Forrest/BCNA spoke to the efforts and process leading up to
preparation of the latest proposed design review guidelines. The BCNA
membership voted to approve the guidelines at their August 15, 2010
meeting The guidelines, as originally drafted, proved to be too vague for
many Questions centered on claims of vagueness, process description,
and proper notification of BCNA membership of what was being proposed,
its impact on their property and their ability to upgrade their property and
retain their historic designation
Gary reminded those in attendance that the guidelines were a statement of
policy, and that the BCNA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) were
established during Phase l of the nomination process whereas 84% of
Phase l property owners agreed to the establishment of the district. Notice
of the proposed guidelines were mailed to BCNA members by the
association leadership providing information of the main issues and seeking
return comments no later than August 16, 2010 The Association receives
no negative responses
Commission Members 2
Scott Irons • Byron Gumz • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten • Greg Rainka
Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie
• BCNA resident Anne Knaap thanked commission members and .BCNA
leadership for addressing questions raised at the council meeting Many of
the suggested revisions were made and are now reflected in the final draft
document.
Mr Walt Ranta, BCNA President responded to Councilman Lover's
statement questioning why the appeal powers were not established at the
council level Mr Ranta explained that the ordinance reflected common
approach to design review of historic resources and that many other
locations did not feel the need for `executive level' review The Commission
voted 6 -0 to recommend approval, whereas the Neighborhood Development
Committee voted 3 -0 to recommend approval to city council for adoption of
the guidelines Findings of Fact will be prepared for signature by
Commission Chair Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie A copy of the Findings of Fact
• outlining the action taken will be forwarded to City Council for action
C. Lunch Meeting Schedule
The next lunch meeting will be held Friday, September 17, 2010 g noon at
the Sub Shop of Yakima's meeting room
V Adjournment
The meeting was formally adjourned at 6 15 The next regularly scheduled
meeting shall occur on Wednesday, September 22, 2010, City Hall Council
Chambers, 129 N 2nd Street, 5 30pm - 7 OOpm
Prepared, Respectfully Submitted By
Vaughn C McBride, Associate Planner
Staff Liaison
Commission Members 3
Scott Irons • Byron Gumz • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten • Greg Rainka
Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie
C4j DiaTiu O
CITY OF YAKIMA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Commission Findings of Fact
August 30, 2010
In consideration of adoption of the City of Yakima Design Review Guidelines for
the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District:
Submitted by Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Association
Historic Preservation Committee
• Requested action To recommend adoption of the Design Review Guidelines for the
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District. These guidelines are intended to
encourage compatible development and discourage introduction of incompatible
buildings and property design to our historic resources
Introduction. The Historic Preservation Commission and Council
Neighborhood Development Committee conducted a joint open record public
hearing on August 25, 2010 to review the proposed design review guidelines to be
established as submitted by the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Association to
preserve the historic integrity of all properties listed on the Yakima Register of
Historic Places, contributing or non - contributing for the historic district The
guidelines were prepared through a collaboration of the Barge- Chestnut
Neighborhood Association Board, City of Yakima Historic Preservation Commission
members, and city staff Mr Walt Ranta, President, Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood
Association, Mr Gary Forrest, Vice - President, Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood
• Commission Members 1
Byron Gumz • Greg Rainka • Scott Irons • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten •
Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie
Association, and Ms Anne Knaap spoke in favor of the proposal No one provided 0
letters or oral testimony in opposition to the application
Summary of Decision The City Council Neighborhood Development Committee
and city's Historic Preservation Commission recommends approval of the design
review guidelines proposed to preserve the historic integrity of properties within
the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District
Basis for Decision Based upon a review of the complete design review
guidelines proposed, discussions with the leadership of the BCNA, exhibits,
testimony and other evidence presented at the joint open record public hearing on
August 25, 2010, and a review of Yakima Historic Preservation Ordinance and
Yakima Register of Historic Places Criteria, the Council Neighborhood Development
Committee and the city's Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval
of this petition, based on the following findings of fact
FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The purpose of historic preservation design review guidelines is to preserve the
historic integrity of properties, contributing or non - contributing listed on the Yakima
Register of Historic Places
2 The guidelines are intended to encourage compatible development and
discourage introduction of incompatible buildings and properly design to our historic
resources
3 The Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District is the City of Yakima's first
residential historic district and one of Yakima's most desirable suburban
neighborhoods
4 The neighborhood is almost exclusively made up of single family homes with the
occasional duplex, and with the exception of a couple blocks, there no sidewalks
Front yards with lawns terminate in concrete curbs adjacent to the street.
Commission Members 2
Byron Gumz • Greg Rainka • Scott Irons • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten •
Jenifer Wilde - McMurtrie
• 5 The combination of larger - scale, older houses such as Rosedell or the Irish House,
along with the period revival style houses of the 1920s, and the popular Minimal
Traditional style of the 1930s to 1950s, gives the Barge - Chestnut neighborhood its
character It is the consistency in craftsmanship and diversity of architectural styles
mixed with mature landscaping that give the Barge- Chestnut neighborhood its
potential historic district quality
RECOMMENDATION
The City of Yakima Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District Design Review
Guidelines and accompanying Certificate of Appropriateness meets the criteria of
YMC 11 62 050. The Yakima Historic Preservation Commission and city's Council
Neighborhood Development Committee recommends approval of the petition of
the City of Yakima's Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District Design Review
Guidelines for historic properties listed on the Yakima Register of Historic Places
1) The Council Neighborhood Development Committee, and Historic
• Preservation Commission, by a majority vote of its members,
recommends the Yakima City Council approve of the petition to establish
the design review guidelines for the district as proposed
. di--
er Ide- McMurtrie, Chairman
U 10
Date
• Commission Members 3
Byron Guinz • Greg Rainka • Scott Irons • Nancy Kenmotsu • foe Mann • Karl Pasten •
Jenifer Wilde- McMurtrie
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION related to Historic Preservation establishing design review
guidelines for the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Histonc Distnct,
Phase One under the provisions of Yakima Municipal Code
11 62.050 Yakima Review of Changes to Yakima Register of
Histonc Places properties.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima desires to establish design review guidelines for
the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District, Phase • • e. "Phase One" is
generally described as the properties that are located withi . . snowing boundary•
north of West Chestnut Avenue between 31 Avenue and 3 °' venue, then east of 32
Avenue between West Chestnut Avenue and Barge Ave "' �' ; ; °< outh of Barge Avenue
between 24 Avenue and 32 Avenue, then west of 24 ° venu- ., ween Barge Avenue
and West Chestnut Avenue, then north of Chestnut - setwee Avenue and 26
Avenue, then west of 26 Avenue between C ut Avenue and 1 t Street; then
north of Walnut Street between 26 Avenue 8 Av"ue, then prop- ong both
sides of North 28 Avenue between Walnut tre :,d W hestnut, and r e properties
located along the south frontage of West Chestnut - between 28 Avenue and 31
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, to achieve the C • ve Plan - ::' oric preservation goals
• and to safeguard the heritage of Yakima, • aluati. 'system shall be followed,
to include the identification of those mate ? a : a v combinations of features that
give significance to pr. :`' or distnc n the Y. ma Register of Historic Places,
and the assessment • i ' he po' ,.. l impact a 4 effect of rehabilitation work necessary for
efficient contemp I . of the prope d
WH ",' afte nti T "I stmguishing historic characteristics of a
property Pejec . ' , • esi t process, retention and preservation of those features
and pals are the . r go. , e design review effort; and
. „' AS, No rson ' shall construct any new building or structure, or
reconstruct, .. :: „, restore, 1,fi odel, repair, move, demolish or make any matenal change
affecting sign' ' histo -` features as listed in the designation form(s) to any existing
property on the � ° egister of Historic Places or within a histonc distract on the
Yakima Register wit • t review by the Commission and without receipt of •a Certificate
of Appropriateness, in the case of demolition, a waiver of Certificate of
Appropriateness, as a result of the review; and
WHEREAS, the review shall apply to all design review criteria as required by
11 62.50(4)(c) features of the property, interior and exterior, that contribute to its
designation and are listed on the designation. This requirement shall apply whether or
not the proposed alteration also requires a building or other permit, except as noted under
• 11 62.050(B), Exemptions.
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District Phase One Resolution
WH EREAS, the Yakima Historic Preservation Commission working in close
association with the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Association, and the city's
Neighborhood Development Committee, at it August 25, 2010 public meeting voted to
approve the establishment of Design Review Guidelines and Certificate of
Appropriateness for the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Historic Distnct, Phase One and
adopted Findings of Fact to support the recommended design review guidelines in
consideration of the requirements of YMC 11 62.050, now therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City of Yakima hereby adopts Design Review G _! and Certificate of
Appropnateness for the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Hist• _ . District, Phase One under
the provisions of the Yakima Municipal Code 11 62.050
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th d. : O v ober, 2► ,
ti :
.7
- W •ar ` cah awley, Mayor
ATTEST
'''.i= . 'n
I
x4 1
City Clerk
5 ,gak :i 3 : +" :::''':,_.
e +
p
J . tMV ::..`
k
L
I '
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District Phase One Resolution
� Dxar
08 /19 /2010
CITY OF
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
•
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES
FOR
BARGE - CHESTNUT
NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORIC
DISTRICT
•
0
Sxfi r . ..s.,', .. ;. :� :y 7;F ;,, , ;;1,.04, .'8.- ;rA+ :c;.. '•s?: ,,�t: +
£;% . .r - 'K �S, `r '$' ri ,�i' ��. + ,I }' ,. +��';,• t, • .a ".re'� ui:'i�F +� } ? ° - �,3 ,:.;f..'.' -`^�s .;) "+ . y � - ,. �u�.
'4'''' - { �" ,a v� � 5 EY'7� .�$� ^f � 45.�+ 4,:� r rr
'" .S fi 4Y � '+ - s Y E ? i 1 t E r { t , J'.. x 4 - 7 as P r r: �:,
,, '' -4 For,a Safe, Viable, H istoric il hb o rh o ox i, z 5� , , y , : k. _ , ` ,t;
h'' � � { F' "1":1. fi { ,r F
' -''.''.' 0 .., . ,. .,, ,: ,. ,. . l — 11111111,1 i, Ate;
l[I
r %;0 v.,••••:.$;,•,41' JAS •� t:I a 'te r' i �. 4�y .+. t 1
e
. - ✓ .+ n r te . .I PAR! W 3 n ' •
'' �
• L .. - c` el :.`-f
7 • `1 ::>r .t...st. = ,,-- ®;' g
, ..Z. t ,, • , • �-„ - ..
.I.. a...! —r.., -e.�- � .•.- ' '- � ' t « -., a ' l' % f. ' v� ''
AA Y -.,., T ' ; ru -�Y „ 5T. ,x•°` a ,�p . '1 '-' r .� '”I'''.":";.- j .n �; Eti'+
e z Lta3 ^ K
'' ;1 • i'i. s y { a 5A ' 'G144""`"41.:1...;..'' { i, 4 ' t r
�-. } r �• ....R ..I. 3 a .:nS. ^._ +!7• '` ; , b wiir !c .4,. . h. -. Ii'k. ?- ,�/,n` r w. °r' T n,
-- *0:, pp • . �. _ q i, , 4, . > AY o ti t . t S: r i. A. 4 4 1 i 6 4 .I + ' .. g
.. nRr� aa Pi _ " t ° ; u bi " � } l bM4s p ; •
•-;;; c S c n. __ 4 � _ ± �...m. '`w..`• i w1 ]r , i'•,
Historic preservation design review packet contents
➢ Purpose of historic preservation design guidelines
➢ When a historic preservation review is required
➢ Exemptions
• Trees
➢ Recommended Preservation Methods
The Secretary of the Interior Guidelines
➢ Contact information
2
Purpose of historic preservation guidelines:
n uidelines:
The purpose of these historic preservation design review
guidelines is to preserve the historic integrity of the Barge -
Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District including the properties
within that are fisted individually on the Yakima Registry of
Historic Places or as contributing properties within a historic
district and hsted on the Yakima Registry of Historic Places, also
included are properties within the district that are listed on the
State or National Registry of Historic Places The goal of the
guidelines is to encourage compatible development and discourage
the introduction of incompatible buildings and property design to
our historic resources A Certificate of Appropriateness provides
official notice that the Yakima Historic Preservation Commission
has approved proposed changes, alterations, repairs, or new
construction for the property listed in the Yakima Register of
Historic Places All guidelines and decisions concerning
alterations, repairs, additions and rehabilitations are based on the
Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The full text
of these standards may be found on the National Park Service's
website at.http / /www cr nps gov /hps /tps /standguide /index htm
When a historic preservation design review is
required.
Historic preservation design reviews are required for projects that
may affect the significance of a historic resource hsted on the
Yakima Register of Historic Places or within a historic district
listed on the Yakima Register
3
The Design Review is for any work that requires a building
permit Without review by the Commission, and without receipt
of a Certificate of Appropriateness, or in the case of demolition, a
Waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness, as result of the review,
a permit from the City of Yakima cannot be issued. The review
shall apply to all features of the property, interior and exterior
which contribute to its designation and are listed on the
designation forms Reviews are of two types Type I review is done
by Commission staff for repairs and replacement -in -kind as listed
in Yakima Municipal Code (YMC) 11 62 050 Type II reviews
require Commission review at a public meeting This is for
activities listed in YMC 11 62 050 as having the potential to affect
the property or significant features of the property The Historic
Preservation Commission and or its staff shall conduct these
reviews The Commission or staff shall review applications for
® compliance with the City's adopted Design Review Guidelines for
the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District, including
applications for demolition of any historic structure
The review requirements extend to any property adjacent
to identified historic resources. Historic resources include
buildings, districts, objects, sites and structures that are listed
individually in the local, State, or National Registry of historic
Places or those that have been determined eligible for historic
designation in a historic resources survey Within a historic
district, these would be the non - contributing . properties and the
focus would be on the exterior of the structure and compatibility
with the neighboring properties With the passage of time, non-
contributing properties, having been maintained true to their own
architectural styles, may become eligible for historic designation.
Property owners are encouraged to work with the HPC and
• planning /code officials early in the planning process to develop
creative design solutions that meet or exceed the relevant
4
standards while preserving the architectural and historic integrity
of the property through the use of original materials or modern
replacement materials that maintain the key historic features of
the original design in dimension, pattern, detail, texture and
sometimes color
Exemptions.
The following activities do not require a Certificate of
Appropriateness or Commission review, and shall require
Commission staff review if the activity requires a building or other
permit
1 Ordinary repairs and maintenance which do not affect
significant historic features, including painting of a single -
family residence, repainting of brick or masonry if originally
painted and in the original color or emergency measures as
defined in YMC 11 62 030
2 Ordinary repairs and maintenance which do not alter the
appearance of a significant feature and do not utilize
substitute materials and follow the recommended
preservation methods listed by the Barge Chestnut
Neighborhood Association with the concurrence of the
Commission.
3 Repairs to or replacement of utility systems if there are no
interior features of significance
To provide more specific examples, the following items do not
require a Certificate of Appropriateness or Staff Approval.
Accessory structures under 120 square feet, not visible from
pubhc right -of -way
5
• ➢ Decks and porches not visible from pubhc right -of -way
➢ Exterior doors with no change in size, style or material.
➢ Fences of wood, stone, cast iron, or brick. Fences over 6 feet
In height require a fence permit without an approved
adjustment.
➢ Garage doors and related hardware, not visible from pubhc
right -of -way
➢ Hose reels
➢ In- ground irrigation systems
➢ Maintenance and ordinary repair of exterior features
➢ Paint for single - family residential structures, including brick
and masonry if originally painted and re- paint is in the
• original color
➢ Site improvements not visible from public right -of -way
➢ Landscaping with trees, plants, flowers, shrubs and bushes
➢ Replacement of window awnings with like style and
material.
➢ Removal of any tree located in the public right -of -way that
has been deemed to be a public hazard
➢ Removal of any tree that is not documented as part of a
historic resource
➢ Signs for which. no permit is required.
•
6
Trees:
0
Efforts should be made to preserve large trees on the property or
in neighborhoods that are characterized by large tree hned
streets Removal of any tree(s) over the height of 15 feet that have
been documented as having significance on the determination
forms for any Yakima Historic Registry property or within a
historic district shall have the approval of the Historic
Commission. Severe pruning other than dead hmb removal on
documented significant trees shall have the approval of a certified
arborist and the Historic Commission. A Certificate of
Appropriateness is required.
Recommended Preservation Methods
The continuous maintenance of historic buildings is an important
part of protecting the owner's investment Historic buildings
require special attention to details Any maintenance program
should recognize the unique character- defining features of the
building The most significant cost item can be the weather -tight
quality of the exterior Routine inspection of all components is
necessary as well as considering repairs that match original
materials in composition, design, size, color and quality The
bullets below provide some general guidelines, followed by specific
recommended preservation methods
• Buildings and structures shall not be allowed to deteriorate
beyond the point where routine maintenance and repair will
return them to good condition.
• Buildings shall be kept in a safe and habitable condition at
all times Structural defects and hazards shall be corrected.
Any condition which constitutes a fire hazard shall be
eliminated.
• Buildings shall be protected against ongoing water damage
due to defective roofing, flashing, glazing, caulking, or other
causes Moisture condensation resulting from inadequate
7
• heat or ventilation shall be eliminated if present at levels
sufficient to promote rot or decay of building materials
• Deteriorated exterior architectural features and any broken
or missing doors and windows shall be repaired or replaced.
• Painted exterior .surfaces shall be maintained and repainted
as necessary to prevent a deteriorated appearance or
damage to the substrate Exterior masonry surfaces shall be
tuck - pointed where required to maintain the mortar m
sound condition. Finished tuck pointing shall match the
original mortar point in hardness and appearance
Accessibility & Life Safety Considerations
It is important to seek ways to accommodate life safety and
accessibility requirements in ways that do not compromise the
historic building or site The visual impact of these elements can
be minimized by discreetly designing and locating them to be
41 / compatible with the historic building in material, scale, and finish.
Architectural Metals
Retain and preserve architectural metal features that are
important in defining the overall historic character of the building
or site Protect, maintain and repair them through recognized
preservation methods If the architectural metal features and
surfaces are too deteriorated to repair, match the original in
material, design, dimension, detail and finish. Consider a
compatible substitute material only if replacement in kind is not
technically feasible
Exterior Lighting
The need for increased site and street hghting reflect
contemporary concerns with security and safety throughout the
historic district It is important to meet these demands in ways
8
that do not compromise the historic character of the site or district
and maintain its pedestrian scale Selective low -level lighting in
key locations and the uses of directional fixtures and downlights
can prevent problems with excessive and indiscriminant nighttime
light. Retain and preserve exterior lighting fixtures that are
important in defining the overall historic character of the building
or site Fixtures missing or deteriorated beyond repair should be
replaced with fixtures that are compatible in design, scale,
material and finish. It is not appropriate to introduce
indiscriminant lighting or to over - illuminate the facades or front
yards of houses in historic districts, nor is it appropriate to
introduce period lighting fixtures in an attempt to create a false
historical appearance
Exterior Wall Cladding
Retain and preserve exterior wall cladding including the details,
features and material surfaces that is important in defining the
overall historic character of the building Repair deteriorated or
damaged features and/or surfaces through recognized
preservation methods for the specific material. Replace those that
are too deteriorated to repair, matching the original material
design, dimension, pattern, detail and texture Consider a
compatible substitute material only if replacement in kind is not
technically feasible Fortunately wood siding and trim are
available in many dimensions and width. There are replacement
materials available for slate, brick, stucco and even cement -
asbestos shakes popular in the mid 1930's minus the asbestos
Replacing or covering over historic siding with a contemporary
substitute (such as vinyl, aluminum or fiber - reinforced cement
board) is generally not appropriate within a historic district
because it significantly compromises the architectural integrity of
the historic building These contemporary materials may not
9
• replicate the qualities of the original material they imitate and
their installation often damages the original material and conceals
or ehminates decorative trim work. It is not appropriate to
introduce exterior wall features or details to a historic property in
an attempt to create a false historical appearance
Garages & Accessory Structures
Retain and preserve garages and accessory structures that are
important in defining the overall historic character of individual
properties in the historic district Repair deteriorated or damaged
historic garages and accessory structures through recognized
preservation methods Replace in kind all or parts of historic
garages and accessory structures that are too deteriorated to
repair, matching the original in material, design, dimension,
• detail, texture and finish. Introduce compatible new garages and
accessory structures, as needed, in ways that do not compromise
the historic character of the property or district Site these
structures in traditional locations that are compatible with the
character of the site Design them to be compatible with the main
house in material, form, scale and detail. Locate new utilitarian
storage buildings in rear or side yards that are visually screened
from the street. It is not appropriate to introduce features or
details to a garage or accessory structure in an attempt to create a
false historical appearance
Masonry
Retain and preserve masonry features that are important in
defining the overall historic character of the building or site
features in the historic district Protect and maintain masonry
features and surfaces through appropriate methods Sandblasting
10
and high pressure water blasting are not appropriate methods for
historic masonry surfaces Repair deteriorated or damaged
masonry features and surfaces through recognized preservation
methods Features and surfaces beyond repair should be replaced,
matching the original in material, design, dimension, detail and
finish. Consider a compatible substitute material only if
replacement in kind is not technically or economically feasible It
is not appropriate to conceal or replace a historic masonry feature
or surface with a contemporary substitute material, such as
synthetic stucco or artificial siding; nor is it appropriate to apply
paint or stucco to masonry surfaces that were historically
unpainted or uncoated.
Paint & Exterior Color
Whether applied or inherent to the exterior materials of a
building —color is an essential visual element of any historic
building The original color scheme generally reflected the tastes
of the era and the preferences of the owner Historically, trim
work was often painted in a lower value, or hue that contrasted
with the siding color Typically, window sash and shutters were
usually the darkest color on the building Wood shingles generally
were stained in dark colors and if used in tandem with clapboards,
the shingles were stained darker than the siding Reapply paints
or stains to previously painted or stained exterior surfaces in
colors that are appropriate to the building and site It is not
appropriate to paint or coat masonry surfaces that were
historically unpainted or uncoated. A simple Internet search for
`historic paint colors' will give the home owner a world of
information and choices
11
Porches, Entrances & Balconies
Front porches, entrances and balconies are such visually
prominent features that it is not appropriate to significantly alter,
enclose or remove Although not required of these features if they
can not be seen from the public right -of -way, the alteration or
enclosure of a less prominent rear or side porch should be
carefully considered and undertaken only if the porch will retain
its architectural integrity The repair of masonry steps, piers, or
foundations for porches and entrances is the same as the
recommended methods outlined in the masonry guidelines
Likewise, the repair of wooden porch, balcony or entrance features
is parallel to that of exterior wall and trim Many traditional
material for porches —such as tongue and groove flooring, beaded
board, balustrades and columns —are still available making
replacement in kind a simple matter However, replacement of
decorative brackets, turned columns or balusters with a
distinctive detail may require custom millwork. Where possible, it
is generally preferred and more cost - effective to patch in place
deteriorated areas of distinctive elements with epoxy repair
products to prevent their replacement
Roofs
Whether flat, hipped, shed, gable, gambrel or a combination of
these, the form and pitch of the roof contributes strongly to the
architectural character of any building Pattern, scale, color and
texture of roofing materials further define the character of the roof
as do features such as dormers, gables, vents, turrets and
chimneys Today, asphalt, metal or fiberglass shingles are
common roofing materials in historic districts These composition
shingles replaced earlier roofing materials such as pressed metal,
12
tile and slate Cedar shakes and to a lesser extent Cedar shingles
are also being replaced by composites because of cost and
availability The first choice is always to replace in kind. When
this is not feasible, match the original in design, dimension,
pattern, detail, texture, and color Copper, galvanized sheet metal
or aluminum with a baked enamel finish are appropriate flashing
materials within historic districts Introduce new gutters and
downspouts as needed, with care so that no architectural features
are lost or damaged. Select gutters and downspouts that are
painted or coated with a factory finish in a color that is
appropriate to the building unless they are copper Replace half -
round gutters and cylindrical downspouts in kind. It is not
appropriate to remove character - defining roof features such as
chimneys, dormers, built -in gutters, and vents Nor, is it
appropriate to introduce new roof features such as chimneys, solar
collectors, skylights, ventilators and communication or mechanical
equipment on roof slopes that are visible from the street or in
locations that compromise the architectural integrity of the
building It is also, not appropriate to introduce roof features or
details to a historic property in an attempt to create a false
historical appearance
Site Features & Plantings
Retain and preserve site features and plantings that are
important in defining the overall historic character of sites and
streetscapes within the historic district Mature landscapes are
not static but evolving and their preservation cannot be
accomplished in the same way that buildings are preserved.
Nonetheless, significant natural site features and plantings —such
as mature trees, gardens, foundation plantings, hedges and street
tree canopies —are an essential part of the district setting and
their maintenance important. They can be maintained through
13
routine fertilizing, pruning and treatment for diseases Replace
diseased or damaged trees and plantings with healthy new
specimens that will have a similar appearance as they mature
This helps maintain the character of the district It is not
appropriate to introduce incompatible site features or
equipment— including swimming pools, solar collectors,
transformers or other mechanical equipment in locations that
compromise the overall historic character of the building, site or
surrounding streetscape Such features may be placed in areas
that are not visible from the public right of way
Utilities & Energy Retrofit
It is important to find ways to introduce new energy conservation
measures, upgraded mechanical systems and new utility or
communication service without compromising the historic
character of the district buildings The discreet siting of exterior
mechanical units, communication equipment and utility services
in inconspicuous locations can significantly minimize their visual
impact on the district and the individual property Usually,
visibility from the street can be prevented by choosing rear yard,
side yard and rear roof slope locations for such equipment
Landscaping and fencing can further reduce their visual impact
Minimize the visual impact of, storm windows by selecting narrow -
profile exterior storm windows with a painted or enamel finish
and install them so they do not obscure or damage the window
sash or frame Align the meeting rails of operable storm windows
with the existing sash division of double hung windows Minimize
the visual impact of screen/storm doors by selecting full light
doors so they do not obscure or damage the existing door or frame
It is not appropriate to install storm windows or screen/storm
• doors with bare aluminum finish in historic districts It is not
appropriate to replace operable windows with fixed glazing, to
14
replace clear glazing with tinted glazing or to replace multi -paned
windows or doors with single -pane thermal sash with flat, applied
muntins in a historic district
Walkways, Driveways & Off - street Parking
In the historic district, single -lane driveways usually lead from
the street to a rear or side yard parking area or garage Some
driveways are gravel while others are defined by concrete runners,
asphalt or brick pavers or concrete slabs On some properties,
circular drives curve through the front yard, in other locations a
shared driveway accommodates adjoining properties requiring
neighborly cooperation. Reflecting an earlier era when
automobiles were less dominant, most residential drives and
garages were designed to accommodate one or two vehicles Retain
and preserve walkways, driveways and off - street parking areas
that are important in defining the overall historic character of
properties within the historic district Protect and maintain the
details, features and materials of historic walkways, driveways
and off - street parking areas through appropriate methods
Construct new walkways and driveways in traditional materials
and designs that are compatible in configuration, material, scale
and detail with the character of the building, site and district.
Walls & Fences
Retain and preserve walls and fences that are important in
defining the overall historic character of properties within the
historic district Repair deteriorated or damaged historic wall and
fences through recognized preservation methods Replace in kind
historic walls and fences that are too deteriorated to repair,
matching the original in material, design, dimension,
15
configuration, detail, texture and pattern. Introduce compatible
new walls and fences, as needed, in ways that do not compromise
the historic character of the site or district Site new fences and
walls in configurations and locations that are compatible with the
character of the property and district. Construct them in
traditional materials and design that are compatible in
configuration, height, material, scale, and detail with the
character of the property and district. Introduce contemporary
utilitarian walls and fences, if necessary, in rear and side yard
locations only and where they do not compromise the historic
character of the building, site or district. It is not appropriate to
introduce contemporary vinyl or metal chain hnk fences in
locations that are visible from the street
Windows & Doors
The pattern, detail and scale that windows and doors give to
buildings throughout the historic district contribute significantly
to their architectural character Functional as well as decorative,
these elements provide access, ventilation, daylight and views
The variety of pane configurations within the sashes reflects the
wide range of architectural styles represented. The wooden doors
also, reflect an equally diverse range of panel and glazing designs
It is preferable to properly maintain and repair windows and
doors rather than replace them for both preservation and
economic reasons Small areas of damage or deterioration can be
repaired with wood epoxy products to avoid replacement In
situations where replacement is necessary, it is important to find
® new sash or doors that fit the original opening so that the frames
and surrounds are spared At times, it becomes necessary to have
16
custom replacement units made by a millwork company
Replacing wood windows with vinyl, vinyl clad or aluminum
windows significantly compromises the architectural integrity of a
historic building and is not an acceptable compromise within
historic districts The rhythm and placement of window and door
openings is usually quite consistent on a historic building
Consequently, it is also not appropriate to introduce or eliminate
an opening on any prominent elevation.
Wood
Throughout the district, wood is a traditional building material
used for a variety of features from exterior cladding and structural
elements to decorative trim -work. Whether Greek revival,
Victorian, Tudor or Craftsman, wooden features reflect the style
and the technology of the period. Exterior wood elements can last
a century or more with the proper care The repair and
replacement of deteriorated wood features includes cleaning and
painting, plus selective replacement of sections in kind by splicing
or piecing Wood epoxy repair products are usually more cost
effective than replacement in kind for repairing decorative wood
features It is not appropriate to clean or strip wood surfaces with
destructive methods such as power washing, sandblasting and
using butane or propane torches Use chemical strippers only if
less aggressive methods such as low - pressure washing with mild
detergents and natural bristle brushes are ineffective It is also
not appropriate to cover over, conceal or replace a historic wood
feature or surface with a contemporary substitute material such
as vinyl or aluminum And, it is equally not appropriate to
introduce wood features or details to a historic property in an
attempt to create a false historical appearance
17
Secretary of the Interior Guidelines for
Rehabilitation
The goal of preservation is to keep our historic structures intact
for future generations to enjoy! Any restoration, remodeling and
other alterations to the structure must follow the Secretary of
Interior Guidelines
1 Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible
use for an historic property which requires minimal alteration of
the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use an .
historic property for its original intended purpose
2 The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building,
structure, or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The
removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive
architectural features should be avoided when possible
3 All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as
products of their own time Alterations that have no historical
basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be
discouraged.
4 Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are
evidence of the history and development of a building, structure,
or site and its environment These changes may have acquired
significance in their own right and this significance shall be
recognized and respected.
5 Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled
craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site
shall be treated with sensitivity
6 Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather
than replaced, whenever possible In the event replacement is
111 necessary, the new material should match the material being
replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual
18
qualities Repair or replacement of missing architectural features
should be based on accurate duplication of features, substantiated
by historical, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on
conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural
elements from other buildings or structures
7 The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the
gentlest means possible Sandblasting and other cleaning methods
that will damage the historic building materials shall not be
undertaken.
8 Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve
archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any project
9 Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing
properties shall not be discouraged when alterations and additions
do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural
material, and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color,
material, and character of the property, neighborhood, or
environment
10 Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures
shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or
alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form
and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired
Contact information:
Additional information may be obtained from the following
sources City of Yakima Planning Division (Historic Preservation
Liaison)
19
r - 1
Yakima Historic Preservation Commission
Application for Certificate of Appropriateness
Date Submitted:
Building /Property Name
Building /Property Address.
Historic_ District (if applicable)
Applicant's Name
Applicant's Address
Applicant's Telephone
Applicant's Email
Property Owner's Name (if different from appkant)
Property Owner's Address
Property Owner's Signature
(The application must be signed by the property owner to be processed. By signing this application, the owner
confirms thatthe application: has been reviewed and approves of the proposed scope of work.)
A Certificate of Appropriateness is requested for
(Check one type of review)
❑ Type 1 Administrative Review (for repairs and replacements -in- kind), or
❑ Type II Commission Review for the following proposed work (check all that apply)
❑ Exterior alteration ❑ Interior alteration ❑ Signage
❑ New construction (addition or new building)
❑ Preliminary Approval (for large projects that may require phased approvals)
❑ Demolition/Waiver of Certificate of Appropriateness
❑ Other {please describe)
Please describe the proposed scope of work in detail below or attach a description
0
Application Checklist:
❑ Application form
❑ Property owner consent/signature
❑ Scaled drawings depicting proposed work
❑ Clear photographs of existing conditions of the building, object, site or structure
❑ Description of the proposed scope of work
❑ Samples of replacement materials
Submit completed application and supporting materials to
Vaughn McBride, Associate Planner
Department of Community and Economic Development
129 North Second Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Please note. The Yakima Historic Preservation Commission meets on the fourth Wednesday of each
month. Completed applications are due four weeks prior to the meeting date you are targeting, so please
plan accordingly Incomplete or missing information will delay consideration of your application
2
® • •
ofY�
a
DECISION MATRIX FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WHICH DO NOT REQUIRE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OR STAFF APPROVAL.
• Accessory structures under 120 square feet, not visible from public right -of -way
• Decks and porches not visible from public right -of -way
• Exterior doors with no change in size, style, or material
• In -kind replacement of wood, stone or brick fence Fences over 6 feet in height require Fence Permit
• Garage doors and related hardware, not visible from public right -of -way
• Hose reels
• In- ground irrigation systems
• Maintenance and ordinary repair of exterior features
• Paint for single - family residential structures
• Roofing with no change in material
• Site improvements not visible from public right -of -way
• Plants, including flowers and bushes
• Replacement of window awnings with like style and material
• Removal of any tree located within the public right -of -way that has been deemed to be a public hazard
by Public Works
• Signs for which no permit is required
Page 1 of 4
REVIEW REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO HISTORIC PROPERTIES LISTED INDIVIDUALLY ON LOCAL, STATE,
NATIONAL REGISTERS, AND TO CONTRIBUTING & NONCONTRIBUTING HISTORIC PROPERTIES
WITHIN A DESIGNATED HISTORIC DISTRICT.
REASON FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS COMMISSION STAFF
LEVEL LEVEL
SECTION A
Alterations to the character - defining facade X
2 Additions or alterations that add a second story to an existing one
story structure X
3 Any non - exempt work. X
4 Change in use that requires a Class 2 or Class 3 Review and rezone reclassifications X
Page 2 of 4
•
® •
COMMISSION STAFF
LEVEL LEVEL
5 Construction of any new structure greater than 120 sq ft in size, except decks
and porches not visible from the public right -of -way X
6 Demolition of all or part of primary structure, including garages or
accessory structures for contributing & noncontributing properties X
7 New garage construction, or addition of additional story; or any construction
containing an accessory dwelling (ADU) X
9 New construction of porch, deck or patio visible from public right -of -way X
10 Relocation of exterior doors and /or window openings on primary elevations X
11 New accessory dwelling unit (ADU) X
Page 3 of 4
SECTION B COMMISSION STAFF
LEVEL LEVEL
1 Additions visible from public right -of -way on noncontributing structures X
2 Awnings and canopies X
3 Change in use that requires Administrative Review X
4 Changes to noncontributing structures X
Page 4 of 4
4110 CIO
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Survey FAQ's
The Historic Preservation Committee of the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Association is surveying houses in the
neighborhood. This is a volunteer effort undertaken by the residents and homeowners We are in the second
phase of the project and working within a timeframe of January 2009 through August of 2010
Below are some FAQs about the project If you'd like to find out more about the project or have some
interesting photographs and /or history you'd like to share about your house or the neighborhood, please
contact Jenifer Wilde, Historic Preservation Committee Chair at 509- 972 -3461 or j_ciniferwildecu?hotmail. corn or
Gary Forrest, Committee Co -Chair at 509 -248 -1845 or gsforre@msn.com
What is a survey and why survey the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood?
A survey identifies and evaluates potential historic properties within a defined geographical area It involves
archival research, interviews, field work, and analysis The survey will.
n Provide research and documentation of the neighborhood's history
• Identify a potential historic district (local and /or national)
• Recognize and honor YOUR neighborhood heritage and architecture
What are the boundaries of the survey?
The Barge - Chestnut neighborhood encompasses a large area bound by Summitview to the north, Tieton Drive
to the south, 16 ave to the east and 36th ave to the west The survey is being conducted in phases and we are
in Phase Two which consists of an eight block area and approximately 160 houses. See the map on the back
for Phase Two•boundaries.
Are the properties included in the survey subject to any restrictions or eligible for any financial incentives?
What can or can't i do to my house?
The survey process does not place any restrictions on home owners or their properties within the survey
boundaries However with the completion.of the survey and the formation of a Yakima Register of Historic
Places, "Historic District" (This requires that 60 +% of the homes qualify for listing on the Registry Phase 1 of our
proposed district contained over 80 %), the homes that qualify will be designated as "contributing" as in,
contributing to the historic and /or architectural significance of the neighborhood The homes that are
ii onsidered "contributing" are
1 At least 40 years old
2. Architecturally intact and representative of fhe era in which they were built
3 And maintains the original siding and /or original windows with no major changes to the original plan.
Prominent additions may compromise the property's historic integrity
Alt homes within a historic district are subject to design review by the Yakima Historic Commission for any work
that legally requires a permit issued by the City of Yakima. Design review helps us preserve the historic integrity
of our neighborhood, encourages compatible development and discourages the introduction of the
incompatible Homes that are listed individually or certified as 'contributing' to a historic district are subject to a
higher level of design review than those certified as 'non - contributing' The design review for non - contributing
properties focuses on exterior features and compatibility with neighboring properties. Homes listed individually
on the Yakima Registry of Historic Places or as 'contributing property' within a historic district are eligible for a
level of property tax relief based on monies spent for rehabilitation during an appropriate two year period
More details on design review can be found in the "Historic Preservation Design Review Guidelines for Barge -
Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District" that will be available after June of 2010
How is a Historic District formed?
The BCNA with the help of a paid consultant prepares an application on the proper forms with information and
documentation supporting the historic significance of the proposed district This includes a description of the
boundaries, the characteristics of the district and a list of all the properties that contribute to the designation
plus signatures from a majority of the property owners within the proposed district.
The application goes to the Yakima Historic Commission for review which will be an open record public hearing.
Here the application is passed on to the City Council with a recommendation to accept or reject the
application The City Council, in an open record public hearing, votes to accept, reject or return to the Historic
ei mmission for further consideration
For more information on the City of Yakima's Historic Preservation Program go to
hilt j/ www. ci .vakirna.waus /hpc /defauit.asp or contact Vaughn McBride at vmcbride@ci.vakima.waus
0 ,inch = 300 feet Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Area
3205 1,2 Historical District: Phase One
113 N N N N 115
IN WY 111 114 113 114 L I 120 116
115 113 114 112 113 116 °
— m M
109 112 111 CANTERBURY ,N 113 111 } 112 N 0004
3204 108 111 112 111 112 11.1 111 112 IjJ
107 110 W 109 ° ° o l 2608 2806 112 1-70-7,.. 111 110 W 109 J 112 ELE ST
1 W 107 108 N N 2812 109 110 < 109 J
105 108 .1,---c 107 , 109 ?; 108 < 107 < 110
m
<
106 = 105 106 105 108 H 107 106 H 107 --I = O p °
104 103 104 104 n ,� 105 CD - 106 108 N N N N
LO
N / ° 1 e- 3011 3009 M 103 a, o o f 103 104 104 105 < N 103 106 AL Lt
101 102 Z 3 3201 m n 102 M N o m m A 7
,D N C`+ N 28 07 102 0 103 104 Z
Z 2709 2701 N N 102 104 2307 23C
S. 101 102 101 102 N S
O P I I I I
10 1 "
8 I rOrilie � M N 4 N �r N 2a • � / • , �, , // tp / /� O
i r. � pp��� i
4 ►
• ' A I ' L. P.1 A / � � •� � • 4 r i
�� 3209 2 � A i i � 1 , �. I �i
m AL_EY
A' /� 2311 230 2303 230
0 0
0 N 3201 2 ��II A 4 7 4 A O• r' - : i� / / /' /r/ / /
/r '
6 ' d I I ���/ / �� %�r 2402 m 0 • o 230
1 3209 • N 3203 8 �� �/ � /// � �� ,A_ ' //' l / I ;I Al I —Y
I /•• -.• - 4 %, %. 0 ►f/ .. .. �� 2311 2307 0 C.
20 2 201 73; � ,1oz I ;; I I I i_ STNUTL .r%� / , N
204 203 204 ` 01 "% i � 2810 i, ' ' /
202 44 ► r. � AO / � c° 2412 204 2
206 205 • ,. p 201 . 250E 2504 o a 24 02 201
205 205 206 205 204 205 204 � r " : ho N N
207 208 < ,,,��� : /
207 208 207 206 207 208 Q 207 ,+� / I / rr „a 205 208 205 208 205 204
209 212 209 210 209 210 209 210 209 • i / , I I g i "' 2n7 210 209
` � `� 210 207 208 1
- 212 211 212 .,, / % '� i� 2 09 212 211
211 Imo, �A� "��' 212 �� I
•
216 Homes in Phase 1
I
214 213 213 I S A_� �I�17�\ -� „�' z1s 214 213 • z11
N 216 • ry
36 Homes are Non-Contributing
w 1— 210
�� �` 214
180 Homes are Contributing g ,, � '� �' i � 217 218 W 215 216 N I
216 2,5 215 / r,� � �1. � �,�' ��
217 I % ,/L T ',y// 219 220 Q
83.3 % Contributre to the Historic District 218 217 218 218 / 11A , = 219 218 217 2310
c w I ,A 222
Need a Minimum 109 Signature 222 219 220 ; �� i' ." 223 N 224 N 221 220 219
Target 135 Signatures ' , ",� / / IAA N 219
CD
32 —
_ • 225 222
4C E3 Rentals of as 5/2007 H 2608 2604
W N 403 004 404
® Homes Contributing > 403 404 405 IMMEI
— 407 408 407 406 = U., 406 406 406
Mrm
4D5
410 2906 • �_ 408 407 408 407 408 410
412 409 410 2811 N... 409 Q 410 409 410 409 412
Ili � 411 4,2
cn
414 411 411 412 411 414 411 414
e » I 413
414 413 416
413 416 416
•
05 October 2010
The Honorable Councilwomen and Councilmen
Yakima City Council
Yakima, WA
Re: Design Review Guidelines — Barge Chestnut Historic District
Dear Councilwomen and Councilmen:
My name is David Servine and I live at 2903 West Yakima Avenue. The
move to make the area I live in a historic district was prompted by the
concern in our neighborhood about Memorial Hospital's campus creep.
The land uses on the hospital campus are commercial in nature, and the
cost of complying with rules for expansion compatible with the
neighborhood, as mandated by the City of Yakima, can be recovered
through price adjustments in the services provided by the hospital and
associated medical services on the campus. What commenced as a
neighborhood interest in curtailing the hospital campus creep, at the
hospitals expense through establishment of a historic district is now
being proposed to be shifted to residential properties in the historic
district through implementation of potentially costly Design Review
Guidelines. This neighborhood is composed of homes of all types and
ages, colors and construction, and some multi- tenant uses. This is not
Jamestown or Gettysburg. This is Yakima. The area is multi - cultural, with
professional and working class residents, many of which are seniors like
myself. I bought my home ten years ago with the expectation of retiring
in it some day. I believe assigning Design Review to my property adds an
unwarranted and unexpected cost to my ownership and as such is
discriminatory.to me and other seniors living in the district.
The entire concept of design review is elitist and fits with a wide spread
political philosophy, that others know better than I do what's in my best
interest. A Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements or changes
to exterior parts of my home is an assault on my property rights. It has
been asserted that painting is not restricted, but the Guidelines
specifically say a color change requires approval and repainting is
required, but no criteria is provided. Substitute materials may not be
used, exterior doors cannot be changed in size, style or material.
Exterior lighting fixtures, more properly called luminaires have to be
preserved or replaced with like with like.
•
Yakima City Council
05 October 2010
Page 2
These and other limitation also raise questions about State and Federal
initiatives for energy efficient "Green" Buildings, and sustainable energy
sources such as photovoltaic power sources. To meet minimal
requirements in old homes, such as mine, sash and windows have to be
replaced with new materials, oftentimes aluminum or molded plastic.
Solar panels would be anathema. The proposed guidelines would hinder
compliance with energy efficiency standards, or make it extremely
expensive for homeowners to comply.
The guidelines are subjective and vague and will prompt costly litigation
when disputes occur.
I recommend that the Yakima City Council reject the Design Review
Guidelines for the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District as
submitted. If Guidelines are adopted, it is my recommendation that they
be advisory and not mandatory for existing homes, and applicable only to
new construction.
Sincerely,
David M. Servine
2903 West Yakima Ave.
Yakima, WA 98902
dservine@ vvn. corn
509 -952 -6710
SuLm'fi1-QA f ,/5 /iv
1 t # 7
Re: Barge Chestnut Neighborhood Group October 4, 2010
Design Guidelines
Council Meeting - 10 -5 -2010
Resident: AJ & Shannon Heckart
112 N. 27th Ave
Yakima, Wa. 98902
With respect to the Design Guidelines set forth in recent letters of information and in
public media.
Shannon and I respectfully Object to the recent Design Guidelines and Covenants that
have been discussed. Some of the Objections and Concerns we have are as follows;
• No Upgrades to be made to home -- must be left "Original"
• Paint color / Roofing color / Style
• Landscaping / Planting restrictions
• Fence Colors and restrictions as to type & design
• Replacement of Windows/ Doors/ Trim restrictions
As we look at the concept and recognize the evolutionary processes that most likely
what brought us this "desirable" neighborhood in which we live. It is the very same
processes that are holding us almost "hostage" to the proposed guidelines. We are
reluctant to have City Government have control over our "Private Property"
Respectfully yours,
AJ Heckart
Shannon Heckart • ` _.
Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Association
0 For a Safe, Viable and Historic Neighborhood
RECEIVED
CITY OF YAKIMA
on 0 1 2010 eptember 30, 2010
Micah Cawley I OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL
City of Yakima Mayor
Dick Zais
Yakima City Manager
Gentleman,
In agreement with, and on behalf of, the co- chairs of the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood Association
Historic Committee, I request a postponement of the October 5, 2010 public heanng concerning the
Design Review Guidelines for the BCNA Histonc District. We feel this is the proper step to take
considering the misunderstandings that currently exist in the community concerning the limited scope
and impact of these proposed guidelines. It is obvious that we have not been able to provide sufficient
information to those who have concerns.
We also request a date for a study session to allow us to more fully inform those who have concerns and
to incorporate agreed upon changes to the guidelines to address the concerns identified during the study
session. We feel once we are able to more fully address their concerns, and provide accurate
information, interested community members will see these guidelines are not as restrictive as feared.
Hopefully participants in this discussion will realize that, in fact, the proposed guidelines provide
homeowners the freedom to maintain their homes, and potentially receive a tax incentive to do so, while
helping to maintain the historic integrity of their property and the unique neighborhood in which they
have chosen to reside.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. You may reach me at 952 -5088.
Walt Ranta
President of the Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Association
BCNA • do 211 S 24 Avenue • Yakima, WA 98902
\ I RIi I. I `PLANATION OF w HY WE SHOT 11 D JUS f SAY NO FO
BCNA'S DESIGN GUIDLiNES RECEIVED
CITY OF YAKIMA
ti Lptember30 2010 OCT 0 1 2010
Yakima City Councilmembers OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL
RE Proposed Barge Chestnut Historic Preservation Guidelines
If we start with the purpose of the ordinance as stated in the ordinance the problems
quickly become clear "to preserve and rehabilitate through special valuation, a
property tax incentive "
The ordinance is quite extensive and complete in delineating procedures Even Meagan
Duval the state official for HP states that "no guidelines are necessary you have the
ordinance" In the ordinance section 11 62 045 A, the criteria for determining
designation is described quite clearly In section 11 62 050 B focuses on alterations to
"significant features" This is the only ingredient missing in the ordinance. It must
be determined on a house by house or district basis. This is all that should be included in
district guidelines a detailed description hopefully with drawings or photos depicting
what the significant features of the district that need to be preserved are
Significant Features Should be Clearly Identified
At city council meeting on July 20, 2010 Vaughn McBribe, the staff person to the
"Yakima Historic Preservation Commission," testified that listing the significant feature
of buildings in the district would be impossible because they are so varied If this is true
then alternatively, the list of significant features should be very clearly detailed in each
individual house's inventory These inventories are then compiled as the City submits
"Phase" applications to the state for designation of the phases as historic district. Then
when the property owner comes in for a building or other permit, there is substantial
information in the inventory to judge the appropnateness of the planned work,
Guidelines More Restrictive than Ordinance
The BCNA guidelines rewrite the ordinance, making it more restrictive The guidelines
also change the intent away from incentives to rehabilitate (which would provide jobs
and increased tax base) The new focus is to preserve these modest and in many cases
poorly designed and crafted structures as museum pieces The biggest problem with this
is very few of these homes represent anything of historical significance The Design
Guidelines give staff and the HPC wide latitude to review and approve property
improvements The criteria have been applied so liberally as to be ludicrous and
meaningless Why? Is it so a few can hold up their personal idea of design review to
their neighbors' homes I don't think this is the intent of historic preservation in the
national register nor should it be here
A\ 13RI1.1. 1 \PLANAI ION 01 WIIY WI I),Il!'I ", \1 NO It)
BCNA'S DESIGN (,l IIDI INES
Property Owner Notice Lacking
The guidelines, which are to help property owners comply with the ordinance, are not
well known. People in Phase 1 and 2 signed and agreed to be part of a district, and were
told they could "opt out" This was incorrect - and the BCNA finally said so at an annual
meeting with < 50 attendees Affected property owners should be fully informed of this
zoning change, with the BCN and HCP distributing copies of the documentation before
requesting signatures
The problem with rewriting the ordinance are many but to be brief it creates much
confusion as to what takes precedence And applying it to non - contributing proprieties
will be confusing - since they will be measured against not what the property owner
wants to do but what the City staff HCP, and neighboring historic property owner want
done
♦ Contrary to the testimony of Nancy Kenmotsu to Council on July 20, 2010, there
are federal tax incentives /credits (20 %) available to owners of income properties
The various tax incentives historically has been the dnver behind the ordinance
and the district. Income properties are where design guidelines are most
frequently needed.
♦ Somehow this has been all pushed aside in the rush to extend this to non-
contributing properties, those with no historical significance I suspect if one
really looked with a discerning eye less than dozen properties would qualify as
historically significant in the whole Bar Nut neighborhood, if the national park
services criteria were applied It is unfair, if not bizarre, that the preservation
criteria of the Park Service will be used on properties that the Park Service would
consider irrelevant.
♦ The ordinance and guidelines have conflict with each other too
It would seem from all the chaos this is creating, that we are not mature enough as a
society for this process. The article in the Wenatchee World (9/29/2010 Fed Up
Homeowners. ) clearly illustrates the train wreck we are headed for It is expensive (this
commission would eat up a lot of staff time if this goes through, to say nothing of an
already burdened code enforcement team) This could lead to many potential lawsuits
costing the city time and money better spent elsewhere in tough financial times I would
not be saddened if the Commission for historic preservation went away and the staff
position to go with it. Just throw the baby out with the bath water, cut the staff position
and eliminate the commission for Historic Preservation, save us all some money and
aggravation. Please call me with any questions at 249 -0542
S c9re1y, 1
Randall L'eofsky
2606 and 2607' Barge Street
RECEIVED
CITY OF YAKIMA
w yt.
4' nrT o k 2010
-,', M,,,� �- .. OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF YAKIMA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
October 1 2010
Yakima City Council and Mayor
City Hall
N akima, Washington
RE Request Delay of Consideration of Barge - Chestnut Neighborhood Design Guidelines
Dear Mayor and Council Members
This commission would like to request that you delay consideration of the draft Design Review Guidelines for
the Barge- Chestnut Neighborhood historic district. Recent public comments have indicated a level of concern
about the draft Guidelines that merit careful consideration and possible revision of the draft Guidelines. Since
the neighborhood drafted the guidelines, we respectfully recommend that the neighborhood be given the
opportunity to re -think the guidelines in light of those comments. Moreover, we recommend that the
neighborhood work together with the Council and possibly with our Commission and the Neighborhood
Development Council to ensure that any final draft guidelines are In the best interest of the neighborhood and
the city
Sin - erely,
�f� CN��tt
i ni • Vv ilde McMurtne
Yakima Historic Preservation Commission
Cc Michael Morales. City of Yakima
Commission Members
Byron Gumz • Scott Irons • Nancy Kenmotsu • Joe Mann • Karl Pasten - Greg Rainka
Jenifer Wilde- McMurtne