The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-28-16 YPC Packet�', F R' I Illqy: �. , 111"�o.I�N,'.�r� � �,�"�u, f �` �...dl�'"w ,�� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Phar itiing Division. Aim Joan Davenport, AICP, Director r,IT s �- "�"��, kl 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901 ask.planning@yakimawa.gov - www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning City of Yakima Planning Commission PUBLIC MEETING City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday September 28, 2016 3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. YPC Members: Chairman Scott Clark, Vice -Chair Patricia Byers, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Peter Marinace, Gavin Keefe, Tom Trepanier Council Liaison: Avina Gutierrez Ci: PlanninStaff: Joan Davenport (Community Development Director/Planning Manager); Jeff Peters (Supervising Planner); Joseph Calhoun (Senior Planner); Trevor Martin (Associate Planner); Eric Crowell (Assistant Planner); Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant); and Lisa Maxey (Department Assistant) Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Staff Announcements IV. Audience Participation V. Approval of Meeting Minutes of August 31, 2016 VI. Workshop on Future Land Use & Request for Consideration Proposals VII. Other Business VIII. Adjourn Next Meeting: October 12, 2016 City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers Meeting Minutes of September 28, 2016 Call to Order Chairman Scott Clark called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Roll Call YPC Members Present: Chairman Scott Clark, Vice -Chair Patricia Byers, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Tom Trepanier YPC Members Absent: Gavin Keefe (excused), Peter Marinace (excused) Staff Present: Joan Davenport, Planning Manager; Joseph Calhoun, Senior Planner; Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Lisa Maxey, Department Assistant Others: Council Liaison Avina Gutierrez; Sign -in sheet in file Staff Announcements Supervising Planner Jeff Peters announced that the Planning Commission public hearing for the 2016 Text Amendments is set for October 26th, 2016. He added that staff is recommending that the Commission set a date for continued discussion on sign amendments and outdoor product displays on October 26th as well; the Commission had consensus to set this date as recommended by staff. Lastly, he informed the Commission that they will have a public hearing on November 9th for the preliminary plat of "Englewood Place" proposed by Columbia Ridge Homes LLC. Lisa Maxey, Department Assistant, presented an audience participation slip layout for the Commission's consideration to utilize at future meetings. She also drew attention to the location of the audience participation item on the standard order of the agenda for Planning Commission in comparison to other council committees. The Commission had consensus to begin using audience participation slips and to leave the audience participation item on the agenda where it is currently. Audience Participation None noted. Approval of Meeting Minutes of Auggst 31s',.2016 Commissioner Rose made a motion to approve the meeting minutes of August 31St, 2016. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Workshop on Future Land Use & Request for Consideration Proposals Senior Planner Joseph Calhoun briefed the Commission on the next steps in the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Update process and on the conclusions that were drawn from the last Commission meeting on August 31St. He explained that the timeline will include bringing forth elements for the Commission to review in October, a public workshop to follow in October or November, environmental review and a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council in December, a Planning Commission public hearing in February or March, and ultimately a presentation of the plan to City Council in April or May. Discussion took place regarding implementing zones and the names assigned to the new future land use categories. The Commission had consensus to have the consulting group for the plan update review the "neighborhood mixed use" designation and come back with suggestions as to how else it could be named. The Commission had consensus to review only changes to the future land use designation and not the zoning when considering the request for consideration proposals from the public, and to require notification of the public hearing for the plan update to surrounding property owners of the requests which the Commission wishes to incorporate into the plan update. The Commission then went through the request for consideration proposals in which they were undecided on whether to incorporate or leave out of the plan update. The Commission had consensus to remove Request A from consideration. The Commission had consensus to incorporate Request C, H, J, and O into the plan update. Jerry Hand, applicant for Request L, spoke to the reason of the request; the Commission had consensus to incorporate this request in the plan update. Chris Sentz spoke in support of the Commissions decision on Request H. Bill Hordan shared some of his notes on this request and on the plan update process in general as it pertains to the request for consideration proposals. Hordan added that the applicants for Request J were present at this meeting but exited after the Commission stated their determination to add this request into the plan update. Leanne Liddicoat spoke to Request O, thanking the Commission for their consideration. Mark Hoffman, applicant for Request Q, explained his request and asked the Commission general questions about this plan update process. Other Business No other business noted. Adjourn A motion to adjourn to October 12, 2016 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m. Ch,airm h Scott Clark Date This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Department Assistant II -2- vise "Alva s Add= l SIGN-I SHEET Ct y IN CITY OF w City of Yakima Planning Commission City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday September 28, 2016 Beginning at 3:00 p.m. Public Meeting *PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY' PE2-00� P(Ar� . ...... ........ ) .. e ? ,L41 Z m -,a,-, D' ..._..m_. .....W. /- _...... ___-------- _ _........ _................... _____._._.__ ._... �..� ___.1_........2........................................_..............��1.�.....�---�.......... 12e-Z-0 n �_.................._...........4.�...... ..:........ s T ...... ..... .. ._....... ......................................................................�.._. ........... ..._........_................ ...... Page 1 09/28/2016 YPC Meeting Meeting Date: City of Yakima YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC) Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT) Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the Commission. Name; Subject/ Agenda Item Number(s) E-mail: Mailing Address*: *Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits. The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during discussion of regular agenda items. Speakers will be provided up to three minutes to address the Committee or as otherwise indicated by the chairman; written communication is also encouraged. Also, please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate language or behavior are not be permitted. Thank you for your comments Meeting Date: City of Yakima YAKI 'IA PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC) Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT) Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the Committee. Name: Subject/ Agenda Item Number(s): E-mail: Mailing Address*: *Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Committee, state your name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits. The Committee welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during discussion of regular agenda items. Speakers will be provided up to three minutes to address the Committee; written communication is also encouraged. Also, please note that the Committee meeting is being televised on Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate language or behavior are not be permitted. Thank you for your comments. Fecha de la Junta: Ciudad de Yakima Comision de Planificacion de la Ciudad de Yakima (YPC) Participacion de Audiencia Por favor complete este formulario y entregueselo a la Secretaria antes de presentar ante el Comite,. Nombre: Sujeto / Numero(s) del Agenda- Correo Electronico: Direccion de Correo*: *Por favor escriba su direccion de correo en este formulario. Cuando se dirija al Comite, indique su nombre y si vive dentro o fuera de la ciudad de Yakima. EI Comite da la bienvenida a comentarios del publico durante la "Participacion de Audiencia" y durante la discusion de temas programadas en la agenda regular. Se le proporcionara hasta tres minutos para presentar; comunicacibn por escrito tambien es una opcion. Por favor tenga en cuenta que las juntas del Comite son televisadas por Y -PAC, canal de cable numero 194. No se permiten insultos, ataques personales, comentarios derogatorios, o lenguaje o conducta inapropiada. Gracias por sus comentarios. Fecha de la Junta: Ciudad de Yakima Comision de Pianificacion de la Ciudad de Yakima (YPC) Participacion de Audiencia Por favor complete este formulario y entregueselo a la Secretaria antes de presentar ante el Comite. Nombre: Sujeto / Numero(s) del Agenda: Correo Electronico: Direccion de Correo*: *Por favor escriba su direccion de correo en este formulario. Cuando se dirija al Comite, indique su nombre y si vive dentro o fuera de la ciudad de Yakima. EI Comite da la bienvenida a comentarios del publico durante la "Participacion de Audiencia" y durante la discusion de temas programadas en la agenda regular. Se le proporcionara hasta tres minutos para presentar; comunicacibn por escrito tambien es una opcion. Por favor tenga en cuenta que las juntas del Comite son televisadas por Y -PAC, canal de cable numero 194. No se permiten insultos, ataques personales, comentarios derogatorios, o lenguaje o conducta inapropiada. Gracias por sus comentarios. nw nw.,nn F ucravex o 8 823 .IWA2040 COW&k ANgI YE, p p xn �xums PLAN UPDATE mexe °` m .+ a x nu"v Proposed Generalized " B •°-w. «, Future Land Use L �Ir//�` ; <;, fC Legend ", r Is Central Business Core Commercial p Y � t •,,,� "nye � � spa" "y A Commercial Mixed Use ri a Industrial _„_........._ / tv i e iu/ iii e„aa ^,•• iii�iy r r w Jf �v e �..,v� �G nv Low Density Residential @tr ” v �o Yi y (1 Pulp Vdl��`+1l� Mixed Residential C g Nei hborhood Mixed Use C� ,r M Regional Commercial �� IN Yakima Cit Limits s^ ` �f iar r: �Urban Growth Area IF- &� /% m err , g^ r A .L 24 • Property Under Consideration �I P�-. N an � 0 0.5 1 1.5 Miles J J j l .lJ.......i i �rwr vicemsvoo xn h a Yakima GIS � V l . AN 2018 ._.. ........._ _ _... ___ . _... .......... ...... ......... ........ .. p .....__..__ e.l The Generalized Future Land Use Map illustrates the combination of current land use, current zoning, and future uses of each parcel of land within the City of Yakima. These categories have been consolidated to �I now6" o.a u, ..,.,_.......,<.. better visualize mixed residential, neighborhood commercial and mixed commercial uses. The map category is necessary to provide certainty to the community members, residents, and property owners about v what type of land use will be located around them. And, where to expect future services, and development based on the goals, policies and objectives of this Plan 2040. r' September 27, 2016 Ms. Joan Davenport, Director Department of Community Development 129North Second Street, 2"" Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 RE: City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan Update — Item H — Westpark Shopping Center Dear Ms. Davenport: Please find attached a revised site plan of the West Park Shopping Center. The revision continues to include parcel number 181322-24445 which is the subject property of this comprehensive plan update request. The revision was made after review of the most recent Comprehensive Plan Packet Update, which was received last week. The revision is intended to show that the required 20 -foot residential setback can be maintained from the west property line of the most northerly building (1,400 sq. ft.) shown on the revised site plan. A review of Table 5-1 of the zoning ordinance seems to indicate that the setback from the north property line for the same building is 30 feet from the centerline of Snow Mountain Road, which has 50 feet of right-of-way. If this interpretation is correct, then the building would Y need to be placed 5 feet south (inside) the north property line to meet the structural setback requirement. This setback would also meet the 20 foot residential setback from the residential district from the north. If possible, could the Planning Department confum that this setback has been properly determined, as we feel it is important to provide a site plan that meets current setback requirements? The southerly building (3,850 sq. ft.) has been designed to meet all residential setback requirements. This exhibit is being submitted to show the continued effort of the property owners to demonstrate our willingness to work with the City of Yakima and to be as flexible as possible while attempting to broaden the size of the small convenience center at this location. Sinc rely, Chris Sentz Westpark Shopping '.en r Cffy Of YAKIMA LAN! 17 *5 DIVA L- A �t SummjtwAvenue September 7, 2016 Mr. Scott Clark — Chairman City of Yakima Planning Commission Department of Community Development 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 RE: Request for Consideration of Future Land Use Change Requests — "Item Y Dear Mr. Clark: We are writing this letter to you after consulting with Mr. Bill Hordan of Hordan Planning Services regarding the 2016 Request for Consideration of Future Land Use Change Requests — "Item J -Gail Buchanan". After discussing the pending application of Gail Buchanan to change the Future Land Use Map Designation from Low-density Residential/R-1 to High-density Residential/R-3 or possibly the new designation of Mixed Use Residential, we would like to have our properties included in that request. It is our understanding that the Yakima Planning Commission will consider this request based on their comments of August 31, 2016 which encouraged us to enjoin this application. Please consider this letter a formal request to include Assessor's Parcel Numbers 181319-34416 and 181319-34509 in the Buchanan application. If you have any questions, please direct them through Bill Hordan at 509-249-1919. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this process. 'Sincerely, Don Poston— Night Development, i .g p LLC Linda '"'ilfert ...m. 181319-34509 181319-34416 Yakima Planning Commission Study Session September 28, 2016: Current Progress and next steps, Re -cap of August 31, 2016 meeting I. Current progress and next steps Comprehensive Plan Elements: • Consultants are drafting elements for staff review • Anticipate bringing these to Planning Commission in October • Public Workshop to follow at late October/early November Planning Commission meeting • Joint Planning Commission/City Council Open House in December • Transportation Plan: o Progress is lagging behind schedule due to a lack of YVCOG Model data Environmental Review: • Scoping notice for environmental review to be issued in early October • Draft EIS issue in early December Final Plan: • After EIS comment period and any changes from public process, updated draft will be presented to Planning Commission for a Hearing in February/March with a recommendation to follow. • Recommendation and revised plan (if necessary) ready for Council Consideration by April/May. II. Future Land Use Categories and Implementing Zones Future Land Use Implementing Zones Low Density Residential Mixed Residential R-2, R-3 Neighborhood Mixed Use B-1, B-2, SCC, HB, R-3 Commercial Mixed Use LCC, GC, AS CBD Commercial Core CBD Regional Commercial RD Industrial M-1, M-2, AS North of Fairgrounds Area Proposal: Change from GC to Neighborhood Mixed Use and Mixed -Residential. Discussion: The zoning and future land use for this broader area changed several years ago from residential to commercial, but in all that time has remained largely residential. The area around Kiwanis Park has seen pockets of high density residential and very limited commercial development. The proposal would change the area from Kiwanis Park south to Mixed Residential and the area north of the park to Neighborhood Mixed Use. Additional discussion on Implementing Zones — inclined to add R-3 to the Neighborhood Mixed Use. The area across 1-82 was also discussed on the map — being adjacent to the Greenway, on the river (floodplain) maybe there is a better long-term use than Industrial. It is currently zoned SR. A more appropriate designation may be Neighborhood Mixed Use. INIroil 1 111111 4 ir _ w ♦ w •awe •,w Washington Fruit and Produce Packing Plant Proposal: Change from Regional Commercial to Industrial to match current use. Discussion: This request fits perfectly with the area. The commercial designation no longer fits well with this area. There is also a strip of RD along 16" in the area —should that be changed to Industrial as well — or be changed to a different commercial designation? IN=+ w • r w « explore other possibilities with RD strin w Old Fruitvale Drive -In Site/Area Proposal: Change from Industrial to Neighborhood Mixed Use Discussion: This area includes the vacant site of the old Fruitvale drive-in and an older (non -conforming) single-family residential neighborhood. There was mixed discussion regarding the potential future development in the area. Do the legacy single-family homes still be there in 20 years or is high-density residential a better fit? Planning,Commission Recommendation: Re-examine potential changes in this area after looking at the overall needs for residential industrial etc. Staff Comment: Yakima has excess industrial and commercial in the arealcity. Neighborhood Mixed Use would take care of the nonconforming status of.existinp homes and allow for viable dev'elo menton the drive-in site. Congdon Area Proposal: A letter was submitted that identified a disconnect between the Zoning and Future Land Use maps. FLU doesn't match the established zoning. Discussion: Staff reviewed the old Rezone documents and concurs with the received letter. This is a simple matter of aligning the current zoning with FLU. IV. Reguests for Consideration of Future Land Use Change Reques,ts A: Applicant: Site Address: Parcel(s): MARTA DE CEJA 802 Wilson Lane 19133041441; .56 acres Request: Medium Density Residential/R-2 to Commercial for an Auto Body Shop Planning Commission Recommendation* Being a small lot, PC consideration of this action would likely require a la[ger region, Discussion of'reqnest T' below included a possible area -wide change to include both requests, due to their close proximity to each other. Staff Comment: The laEggLr area wouldn't fit well with commercial, There is already a substantial amount of vacant commercial land in the city. In addition, this area has 31 single family homes in it. B. Applicant: ARTURO BAEZA Site Address: 815 North 16th Ave; .55 acres Parcel(s): 18131332554 Request: High Density Residential/R-3 to Commercial for an Auto Sales Planning Commission Recommendation: PC not inclined to include this change. ,Next Steps: Do not include further. C. Applicant: CHRIS WADDLE D/BIA DATAL PROPERTIES, LLC Site Address: 115 N. 56th Ave Parcel(s): 18132142537; .42 acres Request: Low Density Residential/R-1 to Commercial for retail use Planning Commission Recommendation: There was a significant amount of discussion on this re nest. It is a busy corner lot on two arterials where it makes sense for commercial use, but the size and grade difference will make development difficult with iust the one parcel. Furthermore, it was noted that past applications for FLU amendment/Rezone have been denied. When considering the highest and best use of this property over the next 20 years, a commercial designation is the likely the most appropriate. PC would like to leave on for now and possi,bly consider a larger area to the south. 1411C801*1949411 mml 411 LZA! W1 fnfff *M1 Staff Comment: Even with an additional lot, the development potential of the lot for commercial use is problematic for parking and setbacks, and would liikely draw negative comment from neighbors A Applicant: JAY LGLENN Site Address: 2O3& 207 Oak Street Parcel(s): 1O1813'11429,&'11427;.SSacres Request: IndustrialIM-1 to Multi -family residential/Commercial for mini -storage Planning Commission Recommendation: After d�iscussion, PC was more inclined to make the changeto.Cornmercial Mixed Use and also include R-3 as an implementing zone. This would rectify the, existing non -conforming residential use and allow additional development potential for the vacant property. E. Applicant: Site Address: GLENA-RAOKE 8910TietmnDrive 1O133D21432;7.O7acres Request: Split zoning Medium Density ResidentiolIR-2 and Neighborhood CommercialIB-2 request to make the whole parcel Neighborhood CommercialIB-2 Planning Commission Recommendation: Discussion on this reguest ranggd from moving forward to eliminate the split -zoning to cleaning up the situation with a short plat. Ul!j92Ajt!y the PC was inclined to not move forward with this reguest since there are other ways toclea up the split zone (short plat). Next Steps-, Do not include further, Applicant: LARRY8RADER Site Address: Vicinity ofPowerhouse Rd/&Pecks Canyon Parcel(s): 18131033009; 2.38 acres Request: Neighborhood {lon/nnercialIS[Ctm/ndustriolIM-2 Pla,nning-Commission Recommendation, This reguest looks, like a spot change. It should be left as -is and not moved forward in the process. Possibly exa.mine a Table 4-1 change to include additional uses such as mini storape. Next Steps: Do not include further. G. Applicant: JEFF BAKER Site Address Vicinity of18mStreet and Nob Hill Blvd (FaiOQnounds) Parcel(s): Area Wide Request for approx. 68parcels; 12.43acres Request: Regional CornnnenjolIRDtoGeneral [mnnnnerciallGC majority of progerty owner support, PC inclined to endorse the reguest, 2 J. Next Steps. Continue as reguested. Applicant: JAY SENTZ Site Address: 4201 Summitview Ave Parcel(s): 18132224445; .27 acres Request: Low Density Residential/R-1 to Commercial use Planning Commission Recommendation: Discussion included the potential to include additional properties, along Summitview, properties to the north are in an established neighborhood and consensus would be difficult. PC ultimately was inclined to not move forward. During audience comment a representative of the applicant provided a conceptual site plan of how the property would be used and incorporated into the Westpark shopping center. Staff Comment: Inclusion of this parcel into the exist1ng_jshn!gppDii11ng center may be viable in the future as a prosect -specific request to provide sufficient opportunity for neighborhood comment. Applicant: TM RENTALS Site Address: 3804 West Logan Ave Parcel(s): 181327-43492, -43493, -43494; 7.55 acres Request: Low Density Residential/R-1 to Medium Density Residential Planning Commission Recommendation: The proposed FLU of Mixed Residential fits this property well and rectifies concerns from the previous application. PC inclined to endorse the re. uest and move it forward in the process, Next Steps: Continue as reouested. Applicant: GAIL BUCHANAN Site Address: 408S88 th Ave Parcel(s): 18131934010; 1.78 acres Request: Low Density Residential/R-1 to High Density ResidentioV R-3 P'lan,ning Commission Recommendation: After discussion PC was inclined to look at ai, large, area, to incluse parcels to the south. During audience comment a representative for the applicant indicated that he would try to get letters from the southern two property owners.. Staff Comment: Letter received from property owners south to Tieton. The larger area would fit well with the Mixed Residential FLU. K. Applicant: SUPERCOLD STORAGE, LLC Site Address: 1415 River Rd Parcel(s): 18131322010; 1.96 acres Request: Regional Commercial/LCC to Industrial/M-1 Plannin Commission Recommendation: Chane is valid and consistent with the broader area chane to the east. Next Steps: Continue as requested. L. Applicant: JERRY HAND Site Address: 1406 S Fair Ave & 909 La Follette Parcel(s): 191330-41485, & -41486; .33 acres Request: Medium Density Residential/R-2 to Commercial use Planning Commission Recommendation: Beim a small lot PC consideration of this action would likely require a l,ar er region. Discussion of re uest"A" above included a possible area -wide change to include both reguests, due to their close proximity to each other. Staff Comment: See "A" above. M. Applicant: WILLIAM AND LINDA BEERMAN Site Address: 419S.16 th Ave Parcel(s): 18132433509; .14 acres Request: Low Density Residential/R-1 to Neighborhood Commercial/8-2 Planning Commission Recommendation: PC discussion included the long term potential for properties along 161x1 to transition to commercial. Inclined to include moving forwardas Neighborhood Mixed Use and add with reguest "N." Next Steps: Continue with Neighborhood Mixed Use ensure proper neighborhood notification. N. Applicant: WILLIAM AND LINDA BEERMAN Site Address: 1513 Tieton Drive & 421 S 16th Ave Parcel(s): 181324-33510, & -33511; .28 acres Request: Low Density Residential/HB to Neighborhood Commercial/8-2 Planning Commission Recommendation: Change is valid and consistent. .w- O. Applicant: SOZO SPORTS OF CENTRAL WASHINGTON Site Address: 2200 S 36th Ave, 4201 Sorenson Rd, 4501 Sorenson Rd, 4601 Sorenson Rd, 4701 Sorenson Rd, 4209 Sorenson Rd. Parcel(s): Area Wide Request for 8 parcels; 77.57 acres Request: Two parcels from Industrial/M-1 and five parcels from Low Density Residential/SR to Commercial use and parks for the proposed SOZO sports complex Additional request by Congdon Properties to include commercial designation to additional properties (181334-44001 and 181334-42002) Planning Commission Recommendation: PC is inclined to approve this request. Discussion included the current allowed uses vs. the potential allowed uses if the change occurs, The park uses are allowed in any zone but the long range potential for additional sports complex uses will increase with a change to Commercial Mixed Use. making small commercial N N potentially N A e^ P. Applicant: GARY DELANEY Site Address: 1414 S. 2nd Ave. Parcel(s): 191330-33022; .11 acres Request: Medium Density Residential/R-2 to Commercial/SCC Staff Comment: This one lot request of vacant land to Commercial Mixed Use would not be consistent with the Criteria referenced above — as it would create more instability with adjacent residential zoned lands. Planning Commission Recommendation: PC discussion on this parcel noted its significant lack of develo meat potential for residential use. It is a small landlocked parcel that that is essentially art of the adjacent commercial development. PC inclined to include it into the commercial area as it is essentially a map clean-uo Next Steps: Continue as requested. Next Steps: Continue as requested Q. Applicant: MARK HOFFMANN Site Address: 3109 W. Washington Ave. Parcel(s): 181335-22015; 2.14 acres Request: Industrial/M-1 to Low Density Residential/R-1 Planning Commission Recommendation: PC discussion looked at both continuing as re uested and dropping it entirely. Ultimately, PC was inclined to move the proposal fo�rwardl, Due to the location within the Airport Safety Overlay no additional residential use will be permitted, evert M839�muv M. conforming situati�on. Next Steps: Continue as requested. 9/28/2016 City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan Update Suggested Land Use Changes Considerations - Continued Planning Commission Meeting e September 28, 2016 YAKIMA go4i, q'I"511PREIIHIMVE IIIIIIIAN RMA)A,FF 9/28/2016 Change designation to match the current use 2 9/28/2016 9/28/2016 Summary—Medium Density Requests A and L Residential to Commercial PC guidance - Given the close proximity to each other, look at possibility of a larger area. G i M /rye .I • 31 Single Unit • 1 Mobile Home Park • 12-4 Unit • 1 Other Residential • 1 Undeveloped Land � r Summary—Medium Density Requests A and L Residential to Commercial PC guidance - Given the close proximity to each other, look at possibility of a larger area. El Area Statistics: • 31 Single Unit • 1 Mobile Home Park • 12-4 Unit • 1 Other Residential • 1 Undeveloped Land El 9/28/2016 9/28/2016 ro Revised Site Plan IEC EI6V@i:D submitted er h r NIE 9/27/16+,wv. _ cFAA appears to meet setbacks d .r _ e8 Now" H d Ktl jyyrt II. ]. 0 / Request �iivl l/ �g, / Summary — Low Density , " Residential to Mixed Residential PC guidance — Inclined to consider if additional properties added south i'� / ! /oiv; ° i aii%/ 9 i it .. .,.... o. Considerations: C • Letter obtained from ' southern property owners. • 1 existing single family home • 5.19 acres available does not � include cell tower parcel) A 9/28/2016