Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/15/2026 09.B. Comprehensive Plan Update Presentation - Part 2 riV ii .....#0 _�ii • i i BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 9.B. For Meeting of: September 15, 2026 ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Update Presentation - Part 2 SUBMITTED BY: *Trevor Martin, Planning Manager Bill Preston, Community Development Director SUMMARY EXPLANATION: City of Yakima staff and the Planning Commission have been working with the BERK consulting team to develop the 2050 Comprehensive Plan update. Part 1 of the update was presented to Council on September 9, 2026, this is Part 2, which primarily addresses Transportation, Land Use, and Housing. The Comprehensive Plan in its entirety is going to be presented to City Council on October 20, 2026, this presentation will include a public hearing with an ordinance to adopt the Comprehensive Plan. ITEM BUDGETED: Yes STRATEGIC PRIORITY 24-25: A Resilient Yakima RECOMMENDATION: None. ATTACHMENTS: BERK Comp Plan Presentation Pt 2 69 a / • r;ill ...4.,,P - 1%0444. - . : A , "dor Yakima /, _r4 A l -: ) =. - . ,+ . -4. Comprehensive • ; r - ,_, PIan2O5O . . r chi_ I - air -. IRA'1111.." ...- hi .44 il• e • \ . Update • . � City of Yakima � ' � . i- 11I- 111,1111 �• ... � }, • • o m re ensive • ti � + : - • ' • 4'4 • 40 • • 14 14 • CityCouncil -Ikp ,M ,�nii.�, � . ....":' ir• .-:, VA, -,--,-4-__ September 15, 2026 volume I — DRAFT August 2026 ; — yy 4i.i. '('i. ` - . R Agenda Land Use Housing Transportation :IIIBERK Plan Elements Yakima Comprehensive Plan Elements ■ Land Use ■ Utilities ■ Historic Preservation* ■ Parks and Recreation ■ Economic Development ■ Natural Environment ■ Housing (new requirements) ■ Shoreline ■ Transportation ■ Energy* ■ Capital Facilities ■ Climate (new requirements) *Optional element Each element has its own goals and policies and supporting background information. 3 72 New Major Requirements For Comprehensive Plan Update HB 1220 HB 1337 ■ Requires jurisdictions to allocate • Requires Yakima to facilitate the housing and make adequate provisions development of Accessory for housing by income levels. This Dwelling Units (ADU's). includes emergency shelter/housing, HB 1717 and more. ■ Tribal Coordination is required. HB 1181 ■ Requires addressing Climate Element. Resilient Sub-element for Yakima. HB 1110 ■ Requires to adopt development regulations allowing for middle housing on all lots zoned predominantly for residential use. 73 Land Use Element g94 Land Use Element Overview • Balanced growth between various uses and natural LAND USE environment • Land for future needs, varied uses and housing densities • Economic vitality of downtown and mixed - use centers Yakima is home to . • • By 2046, 100' 000 people 107 ,443 min. • • • people will live 38% of total in the city County population • • • • • • . 124,259 in trimpp the total UGA 75 Land Use Conditions and Trends 9 • Yakima is a major urban center LAND USE • Predominantly low density residential • Potential for economic vitality of downtown and mixed - use centers • Changing climate is impacting Yakima 's communities, land and resources Growth capacity in Predominantly single the centers and family residential corridors Land use meets 38.5% land is single future needs family residential 7 76 Land Use Challenges and Opportunities .9. - , ■ Provides a greater mix of land use for various housing types to LAND USE accommodate Yakima's evolving population ■ Enhance design character of the City to promote tourism, attract investment and talent ■ Stabilize and enhance older neighborhoods ■ Mitigate land use incompatibilities ■ Coordinate land use and transportation efforts to enhance walkability and circulation ■ Plan for underutilized commercial and industrial lands ■ Consideration of annexation requests where appropriate ■ Consider optimal use of urban lands currently used for agricultural purposes ■ Protecting land and the community from climate related hazards 8 » Future Land Use Map ..9."., a,. ---N-\, a LAND USE / A 12, J ,.., p4„, �'4F °*`Fe`1,/, - = o� I. i rChell-H 4 r :1:1"1-'"Pli:t-1!_-11.,. a 3, ■z- = ,� \\N� v_ ,If fy ry — ■t ii w WLINCOLN AVE n ,•E::1 \V,K .. & ', - - .M SUMMITVIEW AVE _ - �+ a• zI li ill - WYAKIMA PJt. �NI\ „ Q .� U LL TIETON Izi yr wM.w > `TIETON DR - -DIVISION ST _ ��l �� '!� -1 , 0 GUN CLUB RD�� NORMAN RD �, W NOB BLVD - - '..lb IEh„'.. I. -r ! n p WIDE HOLLOW RD �, '� w w illri. ce 41 OCCIDENTAL RD 1VU VALLEv MALL I.i 1 .e w City Limits wAHTANUMRD �� _ i 1-1-1 Urban Growth Area . . i---------------!- r , , _ II a 49- Future Land Use --:1--L-1.-1-1 r-- Industrial 9L CBD Commercial Core 'PO ' Regional Commercial , General Commercial •,` `.5�1 ''" c? ® - Neighborhood Commercial ,�011141.r High Density Residential ,,;; '� 97 Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential q- o Open Space Map Date:January 2026 gril 0 /2 1Mi ! Public Facilities 9 78 5 Land Use Goals and Policies z9- . • Establish development pattern consistent with the community's vision LAND USE • Establishes land use districts; preserves and enhances communities, downtown, corridors and mixed -use centers; promotes community gathering places, quality development reflecting Yakima 's identity • Environmental protection through resource protection and sustainable design • Maintain and promote industrial and manufacturing areas • Land use and design to promote healthy living • Promote institutions, high -quality education • Address essential public facilities 10 79 Housing Element ,A New Housing Element Requirements: HB 1220 &ORM) .n. HOUSING HB 1220 Requirements: Address housing needs for various income • Housing Needs Assessment groups: • Goals, policies and objectives • 0 — 50% AMI ( Extremely Low- and Very • Residential land capacity analysis Low-income groups) • Housing for all economic • 50 - 80% AMI ( Low-income groups) segments ■ 80 - 120% AMI (Moderate income • Address racially disparate impacts, groups) exclusion, displacement and displacement risk • > 120 % AMI (High income groups) AMI - Area Medeina Income 81 Housing Element Overview (i .&2111 HOUSING • Various housing types for all income groups, families, individuals, special needs • Preservation and maintenance of housing • Prevention of displacement and discrimination 13 82 HousingKe Conditions y o • In 2025, AMI for a 4-person household in Yakima County is $82,300 HOUSING • Housing stock is mostly detached single-family; needs diversity • Yakima's housing stock is old • Recent housing produced are multifamily buildings Housing Inventory 2024 Avg Household 5% size: 2.61 Ill • 18% - HOUSING 59% Live in a 7% INVENTORY (2024) 61% two-person 9% household in 2022 •Single Family •Duplexes •Multi-family(3 or4 Units) Multi-family(5+ Units) •Mobile Homes Source: Washington Office of Financial Management,2024; BERK Consulting, 2025 14 83 HousingKe Conditions y ,tao . • Shortage in housing compared to demand HOUSING • Many households are cost-burdened • Demand for Special Needs Housing and Programs, and housing for elderly residents • Environmental hazards impact housing stock S . . Median IV household Cost Burden Status by Income Level of Households, City of income0 Yakima, 2017-2021 $59,228 lirolP i in 3 households are cost All Households 15% 17% 67% 1% in 2023 burdened Above Median Income [ 98% (>100%AMI) I Moderate Income F 0(80-100% AMI) 18% 80% Typical home value Majority Low-Income $324,075 in f/\11households (s0 80%AMI) 9% 27% 64% 2022 ,� below 50% AMI are Very Low-Income (30-50%AMI) 29% 44% 28% cost burdened* Extremely Low-Income 67% 12% 15% 6% *A cost burdened household means they spend more than (s30%AMI) 30% of their monthly income on housing ■Severely Cost-Burdened Moderately Cost-Burdened Not Cost-Burdened Not Calculated Sources: US HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy,2017-2021; BERK,2025 mF-_ 84 HousingDisplacement Risks . . JE, Location Quotient for Residents Identifying as White Alone, City of Yakima, 2020 HOUSING '%'III _i - \ _ 'to 12 , -) li l City Limits 4 •••'; UGA Location Quotient •• r • Location Quotient measures how • White Alone concentrated a specific • p 4,•� •••••• , ` 16to2.0 industry, occupation, Or t_ ••_• ,� 12to16 Y p ��.e. 0.8to1.2 demographic feature is in a Ail— j �� 04to08 local region relative to a r-_ / ' 1,�'������jII. 0.4 or lower /�� F, larger benchmark area. Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Location Quotient for Residents Identifying as Hispanic or Latino, City of Yakima, 2020 High location quotient -., scores have a greater share j' - •, — II City Limits of that population r - `'�i A UGA comparedthe restof the --';0•�••�•��• ••• Location Quotient pa t j •iP•• • Hispanic/Latino urban growth area. le •••• A 16to20 Yst):14el ••• 1 ,`'.�� 1.2 to 1.6 • ,-, /-IIL: L 0.8 to 1.2 — I I �� 4 0.4 to 0.8 /// 1 j Jr— , 0.4 or lower /� Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census,2020; BERK, 2025 85 Projected HousingNeeds and Capacity� e420 o HOUSING • Land capacity analysis was performed • Yakima has capacity to meet housing needs for all income groups Capacity for Housing Compared to Projected Housing Need, City of Yakima Housing Type Assumed Income Level Net Housing Projected ' Capacity Surplus or Served Unit Capacity Housing Need [deficit Low Density (Detached High (> 120% AEI I) 6,537 1;9 t 7 4,560 Single Family) Moderate Density Moderate (>80-120% AEI I) 6A94 1,274 5,220 ADUs >50-80% AMI 1,832 1,286 i 546 Low-Rise Multifamily Low (0-50% AMI)* 6,863 6,111 752 21,728 10,648 11,080 * Low-rise multifamily buildings,such as apartments, could also accommodate housing needs from 50-120%AMI in this analysis if there is a surplus. Source: BERK,2025 17 86 Adequate Provisions .n. &ORM) HOUSING ■ Required to provide adequate provisions for housing ■ Yakima applies housing and related sales tax, MFTE ■ Other barrier include development regulations ■ Update regulations for adequate provisions o Development regulations updates are proposed 18 87 Housing Goals and Policies &201�. HOUSING • Diverse and affordable housing choices • Preserve and improve existing housing • Housing for all income groups and special needs • Quality housing without being cost prohibitive • Servies for community members • Prevent housing discrimination and displacement 19 88 Transportation Element Transportation Element What were the Key Update Roadway/Intersection Plan Horizon year extended from Traffic Modeling ‹to 2040 to 2050 Pedestrian/Bicycle W2.1S1 PR LISOTJECT Transit 140k Introduction of multimodal LOS Freight <jib Updated long-term project list and planning I evel costs Financing Strategies IF Focus on balancing investments amongst activeTransportation Element transportation , connectivity, and improving vehicle movements 2190 Multimodal LOS (MMLOS) Standards intersection delay (graded LOS A to F, standard at D) degree of network �Ac Q A rL) completeness (ped master plan) Auto-Oriented Planning degree of network completeness (bike master plan) how accessible is the bus stop? (Green, orange, red) 0 (ND RzEci iga 0 6181 0 Multimodal Planning 22 91 Forecasts (traffic and land use) -100,000 2046 City: 107,443 7,443 (7%) Population 2046 UGA: 16,816 Housing Units 89,425 2046 need: 100,073 10,648 (+12%) Jobs Allali 50,087 54,309 4,222 (+8.4%) PM Peak Hour Tri • s Historical Growth: _c 25% Year PM Peale Hoer c e Yp 1 2cr,tand: i.a Forecastimm 72,121 0 20% 0 Existing 65,597 m a15% v Increase - Trips Kennewick; %Increase over Existingo 10% 9.9 /o Wenatchee:8.5% Yakima:6.0% Land Use growth includes City of Yakima and Unincorporated UGA growth 5% Walla waiia: _6 0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Year 23 92 Vehicle Level of service WNpGHESAVE WNpCHESAVE ImMAPz � - ' t LEWyRD m AyRD N� i til �ON' 0O _ CRUSH�� fA CRUS E' V ? Identify existing Sz3 -;, LOS at study z intersections iz v iz O1 ELKS -- MEMORIAL z ~�- 'OU� D MEMORIAL i ELKS m ARUI m r it, <PARK Z S r:E:r:::o, WIZTO - EEYO WZTxIdentify future LOS 1'1i HI z ��GILBERT F E O� B YAKIMA AVE o y LiLBERT - r V`N u• Fly PARK N Z SARG �'iLc W LINCOLN AVE m E rn EYAKIMA AVE o RO O SUMMITVIEW AVE \ ,) FRANKLIN O '' w PARKARD h'R PARK ,_.,f FRANKLIN O O HUBBARD PARK 8 POOL Z O SUMMITVIEW AVE Z , w PARK v�u, < KIWANIS PAF PARK 8 POOL t.1 yL Q K/WANIS PARK (includes some © m_ Z S GATEWAY v m B GATEWAY 7IETON DR TIETON DR LL SPORTA COA a Q © ® O Z _ y TIETON OR TIETON DR LL SPORTS COMP j --� m cn YAKIMAARE. m w m YAKIMAAREA a FISHER GOLF ARBORETUA w ¢ FISHER GOLF ARBORETUA! W NOB HILL BLVD 0 0 > w ��h a 0 WNOBHILLBLVD © ® 0 funded capital WIDE HOLLOWRD WESi� w 0 �. m �rn w "' i > WIDE HOLLOW RD WEST y VALL t '�17Y PARK= RANDALL PARK a = m VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK a RANDALL'PARK ¢ m v - KISSEL W MEAO AVE o E MEAD AVE• - PARK TAHOMA GARDNER i7 N/SSEL TAHOMA W MEAD AVE o E MEAD•AVE•� • Lri v' o m O PARK CEMETERY GARDNER F.C. N o improvements) rn O CEMETERY pgRK �+ N ¢ ¢PERRY N, Z v O PERRY SOCCER PARK N� z © O SOCCER COMPLEX WWASHINGTON•AVE iP� x COMPLEX WWASHINGTON•AVV� d+� Yo 0 -- "iS •.r�Al SOZOSPORTS Yaei"aA" �• Aisle COMPLEX - .nnavMcAlrstr rri i VALLEY MALL BLVD — OCCIDENTAL RD �� e VALLEY MALL BLVD r�l � - W um RD EAHTANUAA RD 101 `3 W AH7ANUM RE ti 1--------I i zF Z 0 0�T Level of Service Intersection Control < gYRD Level of Service Intersection Control 24yRL • LOS A-C O Signal Control o9eF • LOS A-C O Signal Control ., i ,c,c ti� LOS D I Stop Control LOS D 0 Roundabout 4 j LOS E CityLimits 0 LOS E 9, Il 97 r Stop Control • LOS F � 1 UGA �� • LOS F P 11 City Limits Park t Park I I Mi. UGA �' f Mi. 93 Pedestrian Level of Service W NpCHES AVE , ‘ ti MAPLEWgyRD (� w _ P�ION r- w z CRUSte O CD O Downtown network largely complete sG17�, I Q ' X1� _ x _ TERRACE HEIGHT gir , a New street standards SRO SUMMITVIEW/AVE . 1111 :' x ' . ! .....6. 1 11111 , require sidewalk on both TIETON DR • TIETONIDR CI N� 1 m GUN CLUB RDD—NORMAN RD- sides of street N _ ,, w r'NOBfHILL�BLVD til lill ■ T m WIDE HOLLOW RD — Q w a ' O N ) < 0 Z = WAMEADYAVE EIMEAD AVE t Sidewalk around schools _ I mct J an has been a priority _ ct S0M SPORTS Term nabMcAlllistcr m OCCIDENTAL RD SOMP_LEX lay .....e. W/AHTANUMIRD pr�P�JM FD r-Th ,. F m m �T �qy RD D 2 Q‘,IDYakima Pedestrian Master Plan: Greenway Path Aso _= �'' ti'1‘',.: ExistingSidewalk LOS _� �� City Limits 0 v, 1 �`, Meets Standard 97 Mi.';v �;� UGA HoRA 11 Below Standard Park o �o Significantly Below Standard/No Sidewalk Map Date:August 2026 F Q 25 94 Bicycle Level of Service . _ . CRUS -- — =Pir.- -- - , t ,L(1, • ....._ 0 _ Existing ..=.,.,._ Liivii--. \ . • r---____ .,,,,„,:.?.,„, . _ Trails and connections to 1 ,,,,.. ,„, , , -, Lu a •-•,\ -11 • > . trails have been the focus ) 1 itcr—ri—P < az \ ,:ir, )2.00 v•\°. _ . 'TERRACE HEIGHTS DR ‘,W NAVE - —11,_ ; W LINCOLNrAVE Z 1-59) CC, M 0 S t arterials lack facilities ----1- ri SUMMIT-VIEW AVE 11,(0014,NP.°- ot. • jj Illri‘ -4j'' , I- 0 — nizc Lt..7......_Titz NORMAN%) TIETON'DR ifl 5 • ' I I F .3 A < tP u_ A U) Bicycle Boulevards an Li., u., > W NOB HILL BLVD 82 e NOB HILL BLVD CP lc') fi ....... -.tr....ma • -n • ------ WIDE HOLLOW RD 1., z w u., x< L;:ij LAI i x important priority __ c, ,co_ W MEAD AVE 0 E> c 'i< , 1-01•177,,Co to cn cr) W‘A,ASHINnTON AVE 0 CC , ,,, OCCIDENTAL RD TerrninaltMcAll,, .._ AHTANUM RD W AHTANUM RD ', 1 cf) est ' BMP Routes Bicycle Master Plan Level of Service /it) 7 Bicycle Facility Present w • .- .....--- 4 . unmarked Routes ' 1/ -----.57i'''•., No Bicycle Facility 11, 1 fiLs-'7.'2.•'.• -t..I A, I • ...V 1 ,_, :•-•; 11 City Limits • :. i \_ ....Pio,;), \'....*------/:", .-/ 7 UGA -P 0 Park 0 0 -I Mi Map Date:January 2026 tm . 26 95 Transit Level of Service W HpCHES AVE N MAPLEWg YRD O �p Lii w GPN�ON 1- z CRUSN,- N 0 az Transit LOS a measure of how accessible bus stops are as a pedestrian 12 e� 0 © CHESTERLEv � • PARKf 0O 0 cy 00 t7 I. 1/4 .. ® 000 m • Q S6, ;••••�• O'• ••• 0 0D A TERRACE HEIGHTS �iF� GILBERT PARK = •••oo 0000 O O O� • 6. 0 Ca SARG HUBBARD DR a 6'O .000 0 00 00 0 8o0mOm4Lb06.b•0•••• 000000 CO 0 .. .0 8 • (PARK N FRANKLIN PARK •• O � p •O • K/WAN/S PARK U 0 V &POOL • • 0 O 6 GATEWAY c O TIETON DR 0 0 �ooO�OmO0 OO 0 QO�OQ7A••••••••.•�, •••- 1 e 6 gm, 0SPOKT ACOMPLEX<GUN CL•UBRD NORMAN RD Lu > QO O FISHER GOLF Q 0C_ OARBA� can LI _ • OVQ O OOCOOCXD Qom_ QED Mee �0 00 0ARBORETUM WIDE HOLLOW RD m V RANDALL 0 O 0 ��0 m °' PARK 8 • 8 { O m WEST VALLEY K/SSEL =castCOMMUNITY PARK NqV Q E•MLAD�r.. .' O ! FC F PARK TAHOMA 0 N o sidewalk near bus stop CEMETERY •:gRDN:R PARK 24 c ® W.WASHi^ �� O. QO . o ( > 1 O® ft) — Q SOZOSPORTS Yakima Air Q • w OCCIDENTAL RD r=- COMPLEX Terminal/McAllsler m 00 w JJnn�� N TANUM RD W AHTANUM RD , r 0,:, rn a rT Bus Stop LOS 124YRD o Sidewalk greater than 100ft from Bus Stop eRD Sidewalk within 100 feet of Bus Stop ti,1°'.� o Sidewalk Adjacent to Bus Stop 0 -...i= Il City Limits 71 Tye BRA •,4.' ...... Park 00 1/21 a Mi. Map Date: December 2025 a 27 96 Capital ro'ect ma roadwa & intersecti1 , , \ -\,=="onp � p y J _ _ MAPLEWAY RD-) q�-;iJ I� "%I 'h} I ' )rikillikit- JJ ;1,k-N - z oeJy 'r t Project •im rovements based J p , � , on the evaluation of travel ' _. forecasts, safety, and LOS = IS �'R _ -- ` �Pri CHESTERLEY AL, < 0 - L- I PARK? U/�q m R-16 Kip 1352 �_ �1.�� 4--[i-, LFBLVD VP Projects widen corridors �, o ` 2 YAK11 Z ' i8 /ZR-19, R-20 "7 = N TERRACE HEIGHTS DR .n E YAKIMA•AVE • _ Y R-29 WLINCOLN AVE ym KIWANIS PARK 6 construct new connections' GILBCE,RTPARK GATEWAY SPORTS WA-13522 SARG HUBBARD SUMMITVIEW AVE COMPLEX w p FRANKLIN 4 PARK 8 POOL c. Z s rr��,,� m n and improve intersections TIETON DR w C r-q , a NORMAN Rp V w c-- '' FISHER GOLF K Y YAKIMA AREA v m N C < w R '+I ARBORETUM • • • • a r-L- a W NOB HILL BLVD R-22 < 0 T ec Project list includes planning WID\LOWRD N s N YAKl10 w } VALLEY N PARKDALL r A I Z COMMUNITY PARKo Q_ j� W MEAD AVE R-24 U� W m KISSEL PARK TAHOMA V N m level cost estimates NASIfINGTON CEMETERY GARDNER PARK N 0 it AVE SOCCER _ ' COA4P,LTEX L g F SOZO SPORTS Y.1 nos Aa �P 1 m !_II;CIOFN TA'.RI, $ , EX T .Mc.Al.i�tei /.1.--'j F r I iI _, > Intersection Improvement Projects r— T Roi , Intersection �, /~ '— Corridor Improvement Projects I P op , '- i - Other - Roadway Improvement `• ��`'. - New Roadway 97 11 City Limits Th0...P 0 Park '� ,�li Map Date:August 2026 28 97 Ca i to I Project M a Active Mod e spp , \ :\.„..__________,_, .i, , -MAPLEWAY RD—) % t ) , fR I ' 1 rJ w J ,es' ( i � Ir � \ Z O�J I r 1 ,11l 1 ❑ Pro'ect improvements based J p1 on safety, LOS and active - transportation system gaps ��� �•�s Q-qg2 A-34 • • • �-S7 a 7 Projects build sidewalks, add 62 aII t N q-55 q'q ` m /-50 a1�1I Y); TERRACE HEIGHTS DR • M. A-96 a a A-51 a �4A-68 A 65 '6 A 3$ bike lanes, enhance crossings, m� _ gBZA-109 ,A;o2c yA-6?tom P.Q, SARG v - Q RUBBARD SUMMITVIEW AVE m p.AA r P'�0 A-28 PARK • • • Nf E A-S Q a QI A-83 A-25 ,o m A-45 A-41\ Aa3 a, Z , and improve intersections TIET,,II 1 A-45 m m A•53 v l�A-53 w �1• a A-10 Z n NORMAN Rp a; FISHER F .n14 o Aa2 • D '' A-3 A-4 Mcr, YAKIMAa0;1 AREA ` j • • • �A-57�r_A-56 W OB HILLL BLVDQ A-78 m A-16 na c-- -'' < ARBORETUMProect list includes planning W,D\LONRD J m AN7 PAARK<1 a C �� r A-73 et 04 Q w > Q F o n QQ { Q Q o0 0 ,ro -Q o A-6 G A-40 m A-40 Q ` I4.5'7• A-101 A-1 c 1 QA-0 w 86 Qm A —_ I. Q GARONER PARK level cost estimates Q Q Q WWASHINGTON AVE -Cr�� ? - oL o 4 PERRY SOCCER ❑ COMPLEX a ❑ a KI w imilimeSOZO SPORTS , m COPAPLEX 1I'i_'_ rn 14 OCCIDENTAL RD � — ,^` AHTANUMyRD 19.1 Ian j W AHTANUM RD -1 1 r �j 1 — t_, „___ --------f —1 -....„—, 1 6 z — -, r +Active Mode Projects O Intersection Project /-• _,:c,, - Corridor Project 97 J 11 City Limits Th07% _i_ti1/4_...L,..2. Park 0 0 '/2 1Mi. Map Date:August 2026 1 \ ''' • 29 98 j Ca ital Proect Type and Cost p � Cost to build the entire transportation plan (all modal networks) Recent changes to the GMA Intersection $ 114,160,000 19.5% Roadway Capital require the Inclusion of non - Projects (includes motorized improvements in maintenance) $ 77,930,000 13.3% potential transportation impact fees and long-range New Roadway $ 144,060,000 24.6% planned improvements Active Transportation $ 102,410,000 17.5% Other (includes non- city led projects) $ 143,070,000 24.5% Studies $ 3,490,000 0.6% 30 99 Forecast Revenue Shortfall Delaying Improvement Projects Exhibit 4-35. Estimated Transportation Revenues ( 0 7 - 2050) Exploring Impact Fees RevenueSou, Total 7- o Additional Grant Awards Transportation Capital Revenues $374,184,000 Tax Increment Financing Total Capital Project Costs $585,120,880 Voter Approved Bond/Tax Total Estimated Shortfall ($210,936,000) Package 1 All revenues in 2026 dollars Local Improvement Districts 3:100 Next Steps Next Steps ■ September - October 2026: Commerce 60-day review of Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations ■ November- December 2026: Council Hearing and Adoption (wurre:MAKQtS) 102