HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/16/2026 09.D. Resolution authorize SIED grant application submission_air terminal cargo & MRO feasibility study 'V
ii
r
_�ii
•
••
i
,ir,;:k >,
i
t, gin.;—* _1a _-
'^
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 9.D.
For Meeting of: June 16, 2026
ITEM TITLE: Resolution authorizing the submittal of grant applications to the
Yakima County SIED Board and the U.S. Economic Development
Administration (EDA) for the Yakima Air Terminal Cargo & MRO
Feasibility Study
SUBMITTED BY: Gary Ballew, Assistant City Manager
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Yakima Air Terminal serves an essential role in supporting the region's economy. Growing congestion at
Puget Sound airports, particularly SEA, has created the need to examine alternative cargo and MRO
capacity in Central Washington. This feasibility study evaluates cargo demand, infrastructure needs,
runway requirements, economic impacts, and long-term development opportunities.
The total projected cost is $210,000. The City is requesting $150,000 from EDA and $50,000 from the
SIED program and utilizing $10,000 from the Economic Development Fund. The SIED and Economic
Development contribution will function as the local match required by EDA. No general fund dollars are
expected to be required for this project.
Attached is the Resolution authorizing the application to both SIED and EDA, the draft SIED application
and the draft EDA application.
ITEM BUDGETED: No
STRATEGIC PRIORITY 24-25: A Thriving Yakima
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution for SIED Application Cargo and MRO.docx
SIED Feasibilty and Planning Funding Application -YKM Cargo MRO.pdf
YKM_EDA_Application_Responses (1).docx
228
RESOLUTION NO. R-2026-
A RESOLUTION authorizing submission of applications to the Yakima County
Supporting Investments in Econ authorizing submission of applications to the Yakima
County Supporting Investments in Economic Development (SIED) Board and to the U.S.
Economic Development Administration (EDA) for feasibility and planning funding to study
the expansion of air cargo and MRO capacity at Yakima Air Terminal—McAllister Field
(YKM).
WHEREAS, the SIED Program provides feasibility and planning grants to Yakima
County jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Economic Development Administration offers Planning Grants to
support regionally beneficial economic development strategies; and
WHEREAS, YKM is a critical public facility supporting agriculture, logistics,
manufacturing, and aerospace sectors across Yakima County; and
WHEREAS, congestion at Seattle—Tacoma International Airport and regional freight
bottlenecks complicate Central Washington's supply chains; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to complete a feasibility and planning study evaluating cargo
demand, infrastructure needs, MRO potential, workforce impacts, and funding strategies; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of the feasibility study is $210,000, including a $150,000 EDA
Planning Grant request, $50,000 SIED request and $10,000 in economic development funding
serving as the local match; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. The City Manager is authorized to submit a SIED application requesting
$50,000 for feasibility and planning funding for the YKM Cargo & MRO Feasibility Study.
Section 2. The City Manager is authorized to submit an EDA Planning Grant
application requesting $150,000 for the same feasibility study.
Section 3. The City Manager is authorized to execute all required certifications,
assurances, forms, and related documents.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of June, 2026.
Matt Brown, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rosalinda Ibarra, CMC, City Clerk
1
229
Yakima County SIED Fund
Supporting Investments in
Economic Development
Application for Feasibility
or Planning Study Funds
230
Yakima County SIED Board
Supporting Investments in Economic Development Board
APPLICATION FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY/PLANNING PROJECT FUNDING
CERTIFICATION
Applicant: City of Yakima
Federal Tax Number:
Contact: Gary Ballew
Title: Assistant City Manager
Telephone: 509.575.6000
Fax:
Email: gary.ballew@yakimawa.gov
Address: 129 N 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Indicate the minimum necessary total public project infrastructure feasibility or planning costs.
Amount of SIED grant requested: $50,000
($150,000 Maximum per applicant, per year)
20% match: $10,000
Other funding source(s): $150,000
TOTAL public project infrastructure planning costs: $ 210,000
Feasibility Study/Planning Project title:Cargo/MRO Feasibility Study YKM
Resolution #authorizing application:
Declaration: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION TO THE
SUPPORTING INVESTMENTS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OARD IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
Signature of Responsible Official:
Print or Type Name and Title: Gary Ballew, Assistant City Manager
Application for Funding Page 2 Yakima County SIED Program
231
Yakima County SIED Board
Supporting Investments in Economic Development Board
To improve the economic vitality of Yakima County, SIED is authorized to make grants (and loans) to Yakima
County political subdivisions to conduct feasibility studies or planning projects that support tangible or
potential investments in public facilities.
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Al. Describe the entire feasibility study or planning project, including the parts that you are not asking SIED to fund.
The City of Yakima seeks support to complete a comprehensive feasibility and planning study focused on
expanding air cargo and maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) operations at Yakima Air Terminal—McAllister
Field (YKM). The project will examine regional air cargo demand, potential diversion of cargo from congested
Puget Sound airports, infrastructure needs such as runway extension and cargo apron expansion, MRO facility
siting, economic and workforce impacts, and funding and implementation strategies. This study will evaluate
A2. How will this feasibility study or planning project lead to investments in public facilities?
The study will produce data and market driven analysis to determine what public airport infrastructure will be
needed to capture potential market share. This will generate engineering concepts necessary to pursue capital
investments in public airport infrastructure. Anticipated future public facilities include potential runway extensions,
apron and taxiway expansion, utility upgrades, cargo handling areas, cold-storage facilities, and potential MRO
hangars. The feasibility study will generate the technical documentation needed for future grant applications to
A3. List all funding sources for the feasibility/planning project and the amount. Identify whether the amount has
been provided or is being requested. Provide the status and date the funds were approved or the date that
funds are expected to be approved:
SOURCE STATUS DATE AMOUNT
SIED grant requested Pending July2026 $50,000
EDA Planning Grant(Submit on SIED Approval) Pending August 2026 $200,000
City of Yakima Economic Development Secured Available Now $10,000
Total project costs $210,000
Other public sources of funding for planning for public economic development projects are listed below.
Indicate which public sources were investigated to fund this project, in addition to SIED. Indicate what the
outcome was.
YES NO OUTCOME
FEDERAL:
Economic Development Administration Z Pending
Rural Development ❑ Not Eligible
Other: El
STATE:
Community Development Block Grant n Not Eligible
Public Works Trust Fund 111 ✓ Not Eligible
Department of Ecology I I Not Eligible
CERB I I ,( Will seek project specific
Other:
Application for Funding Page 3 Yakima County SIED Program
232
Yakima County SIED Board
Supporting Investments in Economic Development Board
NOTE: ALL REQUIRED FUNDING TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT MUST BE
SECURED WITHIN ONE YEAR OF A SIED OFFER OF FINANCIAL AID.
A4. Describe how the potential public facility indicated in the feasibility study or planning project will enhance or
encourage other development in the immediate area (in addition to the direct investment in public facilities
described in this application).
The potential development of expanded cargo and MRO infrastructure at YKM will stimulate growth in adjacent
industrial areas, including aerospace suppliers, logistics firms, cold-storage operators, agricultural exporters,
and advanced manufacturing firms seeking proximity to air cargo flow. Improved multimodal connectivity will
increase private investment interest in Yakima's industrial corridors and support long-term job creation.
A5. Identify the prospective location of the project referenced in the feasibility study or planning project. Please
attach a map of the area indicating the proposed project site.
The planning project focuses on Yakima Air Terminal—McAllister Field (YKM), including existing runway
facilities, adjacent airport-owned land, cargo ramp areas, and aviation-industrial zones.
A6. What other jurisdictions, such as counties, cities, port districts, native nations, or state/federal agencies are
involved in the planning, design, financing, construction or operation of this project?
See below, this section isn't working.
See below, this section isn't working.
Please explain how completion of the feasibility study or planning project is coordinated between other
involved parties.
City of Yakima-Yakima Air Terminal (airport sponsor)
Washington State Department of Transportation—Aviation Division
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Seattle Airports District Office)
Port of Seattle - SeaTac
RNCF Railway /fnr miilfimnrlal rnnrrlinafinn\
B. EVALUATION OF FUNDING SOURCES AND FINANCIAL CAPACITY
B1. Explain why SIED funds are necessary and the outcome of the investigation of other fund sources:
SIED funding is required to meet the required match for the pending EDA Planning Grant application. The
study's regional economic benefits extend beyond the City of Yakima, supporting Yakima County's exporters,
logistics firms, and workforce. Since the study is regional in scope, it is appropriate for regional SIED
participation. Other state and federal programs either do not fund planning studies or have been explored and
found unsuitable at this stage.
Application for Funding Page 4 Yakima County SIED Program
233
Yakima County SIED Board
Supporting Investments in Economic Development Board
B2. In the context of the local government's overall annual budget, explain the need for SIED assistance. If the
applicant has budget reserves, please explain why these funds are not available for the feasibility study or
planning project?
The City of Yakima faces significant general fund demands related to public safety, transportation, parks, and
community services. Discretionary economic development dollars are limited, and aviation planning at this
scale is beyond the Airport's budgeted capacity. While the airport is self-funded through enterprise revenues, it
does not generate sufficient surplus for a study of this magnitude. Therefore, SIED funding is necessary to
leverage federal planning dollars.
B3. Have funding sources been identified to help pay for the project supported by the planning or feasibility study?
The study will identify and position the region for future capital funding from:
FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
EDA Public Works
WSDOT Aviation
C. M16 PRidePgkiitipl�vyith ON ly3a is gpbr gf cargo carriers, or MRO firms
Cl. Summarize the issues or opportunities facing your jurisdiction that necessitate a feasibility or planning study.
Yakima County lacks dedicated air cargo infrastructure despite being a hub for agriculture, food processing, and
logistics. SEA-TAC congestion and regional freight bottlenecks increasingly threaten Central Washington's
supply chains. YKM has available airfield and industrial land but lacks the analysis needed to attract tenants,
secure funding, or plan public facilities. This study addresses cargo demand, infrastructure needs, and
economic opportunities.
C2. Describe the feasibility study or planning project goals, desired outcomes and timelines using the table below
(attach additional information if necessary):
Goals Outcomes Timelines
Assess local, regional and statewide cargo demanc Cargo Market Assessme Month 4
Evaluate runway, apron & utility needs Infrastructure & Feasibilit Month 7
Estimate economic & workforce impacts Economic & Workforce In Month 9
Identify funding, value proposition and implementat Funding Strategy & Actioi Month 11
Final Study (Similar report for MRO) Final Report + Presentatil Month 12
C3. How will businesses directly or indirectly benefit from the proposed project?
Businesses will benefit from:
Improved logistics reliability
Faster access to regional, national, and global markets
Lower transportation costs for agricultural exporters
Potential for co-location of cold storage, logistics, aerospace, and MRO operations
Increased regional competitiveness and economic diversification
Application for Funding Page 5 Yakima County SIED Program
234
EDA Planning Grant Application
Responses — Yakima Air Terminal
(YKM )
Section B — Project Description
6.1 . Scope of Work
The proposed EDA investment will fund a comprehensive planning study to evaluate the
feasibility, economic potential, and infrastructure requirements for expanding air cargo
and MRO capabilities at Yakima Air Terminal—McAllister Field (YKM). The study will
examine how YKM can serve as a strategic regional cargo hub in response to
increasing congestion at Seattle—Tacoma International Airport (SEA) and limited
capacity at other Puget Sound airports. The study includes cargo demand forecasting,
infrastructure and engineering feasibility analysis, economic and workforce impact
analysis, and next❑steps planning.
6.2. Deliverables / Outcomes
The project will produce: Regional Cargo Market Assessment; 20❑Year Demand
Forecast; Infrastructure & Engineering Feasibility Study; Runway Extension Analysis;
Economic & Workforce Impact Report; Funding & Implementation Strategy; Prioritized
Action Plan; Stakeholder Engagement Plan; Final Comprehensive Report; and
Executive Summary & presentation materials.
6.3. Schedule & Milestones
12❑month schedule: Months 1-2 kickoff and data collection; Months 3-5 demand
forecasting; Months 6-8 engineering feasibility; Months 9-10 economic & workforce
analysis; Month 11 implementation strategy; Month 12 final report and presentation.
6.4. Investment Priority Alignment
The project advances multiple EDA priorities including equity, supply chain resilience,
workforce development, manufacturing and export competitiveness, innovation (electric
aircraft integration), and environmentally sustainable development supported by
Yakima's 100% hydroelectric grid.
235
Section D — Economic Conditions
D.1 . Economic Conditions & Distress
Yakima County's median household income is significantly below national averages.
The region experiences underemployment, seasonal volatility, and dependence on
agriculture, making it vulnerable to supply❑chain limitations. Air cargo bottlenecks and
limited logistics infrastructure constrain growth and create economic adjustment needs.
D.2. How the Project Addresses Needs
The planning project identifies how YKM can absorb displaced cargo demand, diversify
the economy, reduce logistics bottlenecks, support exporters, and define a strategy for
high❑skill workforce development. It strengthens regional planning capacity and
positions Yakima for future federal investments.
D.3. CEDS Alignment
Yes.
D.4. CEDS Strategy Alignment
The project supports CEDS goals related to logistics infrastructure, workforce
development, industry diversification, economic resilience, and advanced manufacturing
and aerospace opportunities.
Section E — Economic Impact
E.1 . Long-Term Economic Impact
The study positions the region for long❑term growth by enabling YKM to support new
cargo and MRO operations. Future infrastructure could support hundreds of jobs and
unlock significant private investment. Export competitiveness, workforce training
pathways, and supply chain reliability will be strengthened.
E.2. Committed Beneficiaries
No.
E.S. Jobs & Private Investment Estimates
Estimated Jobs Created: 0; Estimated Jobs Retained: 0; Estimated Private Investment:
$0 — planning study only.
236
E.6. Source of Estimates
Future job and investment impacts will be modeled using IMPLAN and aviation industry
analysis during the planning study.
Section F — Capacity & Administration
F.1 . Strategic Partners
Partners include the City of Yakima, Yakima Air Terminal, SIED (local match provider),
WSDOT Aviation, BNSF Railway, regional colleges and technical institutes, and regional
economic development organizations.
F.2. Applicant Capacity
The City of Yakima has extensive experience managing federal grants from FAA, DOT,
HUD, and EDA. The City maintains compliant procurement, financial management, and
reporting systems.
F.3. Staff Capacity
The Assistant City Manager will lead the project, supported by the Airport Director and
Finance Department staff. A qualified aviation consultant will be competitively procured.
Section G — Budget & Match
G.1 . Budget & Match Narrative
Total Project Cost: $200,000. EDA Share: $150,000. Local Match: $50,000 from SIED.
All non❑EDA funds are committed and unencumbered. No other federal funds are
anticipated.
G.1 .f. Budget Narrative (Line Items)
Consultant Services: $190,000 — all technical analyses and reports. Public
Engagement: $10,000. Administrative Costs: $10,000. No equipment purchases and no
indirect costs are requested.
G.2. Procurement
Yes, consultant work will be competitively procured in accordance with federal
requirements.
237
G.3. Equipment
No equipment will be purchased.
G.4. Business Incubators
No, the project does not involve any incubator or accelerator construction.
Section H — Regional Eligibility & Distress
H.1 . Distress Criteria
Yakima County exhibits income levels significantly below national averages and has
areas of persistent poverty and underemployment. These conditions support eligibility
and justify the proposed EDA share.
H.2. Special Need
The region faces underemployment, supply chain constraints, and negative freight
impacts resulting from SEA congestion. The project addresses these special need
conditions.
H.3. Data Sources
ACS median income and poverty data, BLS unemployment data, and WSDOT aviation
data.
H.4. Substantial Direct Benefit
Yes — the project benefits residents of the region through long term workforce
opportunities and improved supply❑chain infrastructure.
H.5. Distressed Geography
Not required for planning projects, but several Yakima County census tracts qualify
based on income and unemployment. The project is intended to primarily benefit these
areas.
238