Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2006-004 Hedgewood Conditional Preliminary Plat ApprovalRESOLUTION NO. R-2006-04 A RESOLUTION granting conditional preliminary plat approval for the Hedgewood Preliminary Plat and conditionally approving an associated Class (2) application and administrative adjustment. WHEREAS, on September 8, 2005, the Hearing Examiner held an open record public hearing to consider an application for a twenty -eight -lot subdivision located at 1419 S. 72nd Ave. submitted by Pete Olson on behalf of Frank Baehm, together with proposed Class (2) uses and administrative adjustment, City No. UAZO Preliminary Plat #3-05, Class (2) #9-05 & ADM ADJ #8-05, referred to herein collectively as the "Applications"; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 2005, the Hearing Examiner issued his Examiner's Recommendation (referred to herein as the "Recommendation"), recommending approval of the Applications subject to several conditions; and WHEREAS, the proposed Applications conform with the City of Yakima Zoning Title, YMC 14.25.110, and other applicable land use controls; and WHEREAS, at its public meeting on November 1, 2005, after notice duly given according the requirements of the Yakima Municipal Code, the Yakima City Council adopted the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation and instructed the City's legal staff to prepare a resolution reflecting the same; and WHEREAS, the City of Yakima has complied with the substantive, procedural, and notice requirements associated with SEPA, the Growth Management Act, and the Yakima Municipal Code for the purpose of reviewing the Applications; and WHEREAS, the Yakima City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City of Yakima to pass the following; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are hereby incorporated into this resolution. Page 1 Section 2. Incorporation of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation and Condition of Approval. The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation is hereby adopted and ratified by the Yakima City Council as its conditional decision of approval of the Applications herein. A copy of the Recommendation is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Findings. The Yakima City Council adopts the findings of the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation as its own findings herein, and further finds that the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 have been met. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL at a regular meeting and signed and approved this 3rd day of anua , 2006. ATTEST: City Clerk Page 2 Mayor FRANK BAEHM / PETE OLSON Preliminary Long Plat of Hedgewood CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT LIST Public Hearing November 1, 2005 Applicant: Frank Baehm / Pete Olson File Number: PREL LONG PLAT#3-05, EC#19-05, UAZO CL(2)#9-05 & UAZO ADM ADJ#8-05 Site Address: 1419 S. 72nd Avenue Staff Contact: Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner Table of Contents CHAPTER A A Hearing Examiner's Recommendation CHAPTER A Staff Report CHAPTER B Maps CHAPTER C DST (Development Services Team) Comments CHAPTER D SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) CHAPTER E Comment Letters Received CHAPTER F Application CHAPTER G Notices CHAPTER H Site Plans and Proposed Plat of Hedgewood FRANK BAEHM PRELIMINARY LONG PLAT EXHIBIT LIST City Council Public Hearing November 1, 2005 CHAPTER AA HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE AA -1 Hearing Examiner's Recommendation 9/22/05 In the Matter of the Master Application by Frank Baehm For the "Hedgewood" Long Subdivision and Associated Class (2) Review for Common Wall and Duplex Use and Administrative Adjustment of Lot Coverage Standards City File Nos. Pre Plat #3-05, CL(2) #9- 05 & ADM ADJ #8-05 HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION Frank Baehm, by and through Pete Olson, has submitted a master application for the Hedgewood Preliminary Plat, the development of common wall single family residences and duplexes on lots within the proposed subdivision, and the adjustment of lot coverage requirements on certain lots within the proposed subdivision to allow the duplexes to be of comparable size to the common wall units. No use is proposed for Lot 5 of the subdivision. The property is owned by Mr. Baehm. After public notice, the City of Yakima issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. Public comment was received on both the application and the MDNS respecting traffic safety and the arrangement of the intersections of the internal streets with South 72nd Avenue. Comment was also received regarding the compatibility of common -wall residential construction and duplex development on the property. No appeals of the DNS were filed. The initial hearing date for the master application was August 12, 2005. The Hearing Examiner conducted a site visit on August 11, 2005. Immediately prior to the August 12 hearing, a letter sent on behalf of Frank Baehm to the City of Yakima sought withdrawal of the application. At the August 12 hearing, counsel for Pete Olson requested that the hearing be continued because the ostensible withdrawal letter was a matter of surprise to Mr. Olson. The hearing was continued until September 8, 2005, to allow consultation between Mr. Olson and the property owner. At the September 8 hearing, counsel for Mr. Baehm stated support for continued processing of the master application. Subsequently to the August 12 hearing session, the City received additional comment letters from neighboring property owners regarding various aspects HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 1 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION QOG. INDEX of the master application and the City Planning stain recommendation for it. The main issues addressed in the comment letters and raised by commenters at the September 8 hearing includle (1) the i paeta ofronnectinn So tl, 69 t -----o _-__�-_ �_�. ---.t.»........�.....+aa£, u,.0 V� t-av vuuc W OVUM. /G tiVen= uy the extension of West Mead, and (2) the impact of development of common wall houses and duplexes at the subject property of the value of surrounding properties and the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Commenters also expressed concern about the disposition of Lot 5, and about the potential for City Planning staff assigned to review of she application to have been subject to undue influence due to a tenant -landlord relationship between the assigned staff and Pete Olson. Summary Recommendation: Sunuuary of Recommendation: The Plat ofHedgewood should be approved subject to conditions. The extension of West Mead Avenue to South 691 Avenue is consistent with Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan policies for the integration subdivisions with Comprehensive r �...� .yvvr,.. wravaa of subdivisions 1J1V 11J Ytl leu the collector and arterial street system and city development standards. The application for Class (2) review for the development of c°omm n welt homes and duplexes should be approved, since the development is generally permitted and there is not substantial evidence of unmitigated incompatibility. The administrative adjustment to lot coverage standards should be approved, since it is consistent with the adjustment criteria. From the site visit, a review of the staff report and other exhibits, information received at the hearing, and a review of Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the subject application, the Nearing Examiner makes the following FINDINGS 1. Applicant. Frank Baehm, by and through Pete Olson, P.O. Box 8021, Yakima, WA, 98908. 2. Owner. Frank Baehm, 1419 S. 72nd Avenue, Yakima, WA 98908. 3. Location. This property is located at 1419 S. 72nd Ave. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 2 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC, INDEX 41 L/ -f 4. Parcel Number and Legal Description. 181329-43011 & 181332-12003. The legal description of the property is set for the in the preliminary plat. 5. Application. Master Application for a Preliminary Long Plat for 26 residential lots, located on approximately 5.94 acres coupled with a Class (2) Review for common wall and duplex construction, Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard & Environmental Review of the entirety of this development.. 6. Current zoning and Land Use. The current zoning for this property is R-1, Single Family Residential. The current zoning of this property is (R-1) Single -Family - Residential, and the surrounding properties have the following characteristics. Zoning North R-3 Multi -Family Residential South R-1 Single -Family -Residential West R-1 Single -Family -Residential East R-1 Single -Family -Residential Land Use Multi & Single -Family Housing Single -Family Homes Single -Family Homes & Church Single -Family Homes 7. Property description. The subject property is currently two large lots comprising approximately 5.94 acres. There is an existing residence on the subject property on South 7211d Avenue directly across from the West Mead intersection. The balance of the property is in pasture. The property is essentially flat. All municipal services are available to the property. 8. Project description. The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 5.94 acres of property into twenty-eight new lots that range in size from 5,000 to 34,394 square feet. The proposal also includes single -story common wall residential construction on all lots with the exception of Lots #5,6, 7 and 24. Duplexes are proposed on Lots 6 and 24 on a scale similar to the common wall structures. That size of duplex requires an adjustment of the lot coverage standard by 10% increasing allowable coverage to 55%. The existing residence would be removed or demolished. A six-foot view -obscuring fence around the development is proposed. The development would include the HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 3 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOG- INDEX extension-ttt �r+4 Mead ♦ 69th South - -a of West Mead Avenue to connect South Avenue and 72 Avenue, and would accompany signalization of the intersection of West Mead Avenue and South 72nd Avenue as required by the City Engineer, 9. Environmental Review. The City of Yakima issued a Final Mitigated Determination of fvonsign fieance (MDNS) on July 8, 2005 following a public comment period. No appeals were filed by the July 25, 2005 appeal deadline. The MDNS conditioned the finding of no significance upon the following mitigating measures: Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of- way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of Hedgewood as depicted upon the applicant's site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A five-foot sidewalk with drainage_ harrier rltr'n gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of Hedgewood. as specified under Chapters 12.05 thru 12.06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight-inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 4 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC, INDEX developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. • Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work." 10. Notices. Public notice of the application and hearing was provided in accordance with: YMC Title 14, Subdivision Ordinance; YMC Title 15, Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, and YMC Title 16, Development Permit Regulations. Additional notice was made regarding the continuation of the August 12, 2005 hearing to September 8, 2005. 11. Analysis. The review of the master application requires review of each of the components of the application and of their relationship to one another. a. Preliminary Plat Application. The City staff has performed a thorough review of the preliminary plat, and their analysis in the staff report is incorporated by reference in theses findings except as otherwise provided. In addition, the staff has developed a set of standard conditions for subdivisions that assure that the developer is aware of the array of development standards, including the subdivision ordinance, which would be applicable to the subject project if it is approved. In the absence of objections or evidence that the standard conditions are not appropriately applied in this case, they are adopted by the examiner, subject to project specific changes based on the following analysis. The criteria to be applied in making a recommendation on an application for a subdivision are set out in YMC 14.20.100. The proposed subdivision must be consistent with the provisions of the comprehensive plan, the urban area zoning ordinance, and the subdivision ordinance. Appropriate provisions are also to be made for public health, safety, and general welfare, open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, irrigation and other water suppliers, sanitary waste disposal, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks, and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. See RCW 58.17.110. To recommend approval of a HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 5 HEDGEWOOD MAS 1'hR APPLICATION DOC. INDEX subdivision application, the hearing examiner must find that the public use and interest will be served by the approval of this subdivision. %Yn viol ol�n�n n, with the .. 1_ _7_ mt development ConJis enl y comprehensive plan.. The development of a residential subdivisions on appropriately zoned property within city limits is generally consistent with YUACP policies. Policy G2.2 calls for protecting existing neighborhoods from excessive commercial and industrial encroachments through the establishment of definite ite neighborhood boundaries and implementation of zoning standards which minimize the impact on adjacent properties. infilling of residential neighborhoods with residential development limits commercial and industrial encroachment. Policy G4.1 encourages new urban development to locate as a first, best choice within the City limits. The urban residential density facilitated by the subdivision fulfills the policy. Policy n4 2 encourages urhar� residential infill .9,.�,,.i...-�. nt _ � _ the ..., .,..,,,�,,.,, .,..g,�.,� b..l V(.Lil residen ia.l infill development, as provided by the proposed subdivision. New urban development contiguous to existing development -a-vo-d...s aninefficient "leap -frog" pattern f gIUvY-t1 . The Future Land Use Map in the YUACP (Map III -3) designates the subject property and the surrounding area as Low Density Residential_ "which may include single family homes, duplexes or other similar structures." See YUACP p. III -11. Thus the YUACP clearly contemplates that dwellings such as those proposed are acceptable in single family residential communities. In addition, "an adequate and affordable supply of housing for all income levels within the community is a major goal of this Land Use Plan," See YUACP p. EI -9. The common wall and duplex development is intended to provide affordable housing as contemplated in the YUACP. However, the YUACP also provides: "To accomplish this goal, opportunities must be available for new development, but must also be balanced by the preservation of existing neighborhoods and the need to infill or redevelop some areas....Sometimes these objectives become competing or even contain conflicting values. Compatibility of new development must remain a principal focus of decision-making when weighing these values. " YUACP Policy G4.5 (p. 11.8) mandates the integration of subdivisions into the collector and arterial system. The purpose of the integration is to assure connectivity for HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 6 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC INDEX accessibility and fire protection purposes. In addition, YMC 12.06.060 implements the policy by requiring that the "[street] pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets." The public comment is at odds with appropriateness of the connectivity that would be produced by the extension of West Mead. Much of the public comment concerned the traffic safety and congestion consequences within the existing residential development that currently is accessed from South 72nd Avenue by way of West King Street. Several commenters indicated that they selected that neighborhood precisely because it was not subject to through traffic and related congestion and pedestrian safety risks. Nevertheless, the YUACP and development regulations call for integrated street systems within the city, and address the residential traffic and pedestrian safety issues by providing for sidewalks and for the designation of streets for local traffic use rather than through traffic use. See Policy T3.9 "Local streets may be designated and signed in order to discourage their use by through traffic." In addition, the YUACP promotes ease of pedestrian and motorized access to services within the urban area. Earlier development of South 69th Avenue immediately to the east of the subject property appears to have been developed with an expectation of the future connection of South 69th Avenue with South 72nd Avenue by completion of West Mead. Half -streets have been installed on the eastern edge of the King Street development, also suggesting future development of properties to the east. Requests from commenters for a dead end Oil the eastward extension of West Mead from South 72nd Avenue, although understandable given the residents' stated desire for seclusion, cannot be squared with the policy framework in the YUACP or with the existing pattern of development in the area. Consistency with the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance regulates land uses. The R-1 zoning district is intended to establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses except those, which are compatible with and serve the residents of this district. The preliminary plat indicates that all the lots except Lots, 6, 7 and 24 are "zero lot line units." The proposal is more properly one for common wall units as defined in the zoning ordinance. The plat would have to appropriately designate the lots used for attached dwellings to comply with the zoning ordinance. Common wall dwelling units are Class (2) uses in the R-1 zoning HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 7 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC, INDEX __AA district. By definition, Class (2) uses are "permitted uses" but must be reviewed to promote compatibility with "the intent and character of the district." A subdivision providing for common wall residential dwellings is consistent with the zoning ordinance so long as, upon review, the development is not incompatible with the intent and character of the R-1 zone. Compatibility of common wall -based residential development is analyzed in subsequent sections of these findings. If the proposed common wall and duplex developments are susceptible to approval on Class (2) review, he lot sizes in the subdivision also confoi ni to the subdivision standards set out in Table 5-2 in Chapter 15.05 YMC. Consistency with the subdivision ordinance. Subdivision design standards and other requirements are set out in Tables 5-1 and 5-2 of the ordinance. A review of the preliminary plat against the standards and requirements shows it to be consistent. This preliminary subdivision indicates that all lots will have meet the proper street access standards, be provided with the necessary public utilities, exceed the minimum lot size for common wall construction an:d meet exceed the v inim,,,•w lot width o f feet , s . , �.a d� varu sracx aaavva, or v�avvaiu Slav laluluilullt lot width V 1 50 as measured at the rear of the required front yard setback. The purposes of the subdivision ordinance include protection and preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by Chapter 58.17 RCW; to prevent overcrowding land; to lessen congestion in the streets and highways; to promote effective use of land; to promote safe and convenient travel by the public on streets and highways; to provide for adequate light and air; to facilitate adequate provision for water, sewerage, utilities, drainage, parks and recreation areas, sites for schools and school grounds and other public requirements; and to provide for proper ingress and egress. Generally, the statutory criteria are adequately addressed by the preliminary plat or by operation of the development regulations. Utilities are available in the area and may be readily extended through the platted easements. No comment suggesting any school -related issues has been entered into the record, except with regard to expanded accessibility provided by the street improvements. Parks and recreation issues are dealt with on a citywide basis through the YUACP and the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. Open space is addressed through the application of subdivision development standards, HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 8 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC: INDEX including lot coverage standards. Street and sidewalk designs are addressed .by design standards established in Title 12 of the Yakima Municipal Code. Agency review comments in the record indicate compliance with Title 12. Finally, in regard to RCW 58.17.110 and YMC 14.20.100, a subdivision may be recommended if it is in the public interest. The applicant argues that the subdivision is in the public interest because it provides affordable housing, jobs and improved traffic circulation, and fulfills infilling objectives of the YUACP. Public commenters challenged the idea that the subdivision was in the public interest, since any employment would be transitory. Otherwise, comments indicated that the extension of West Mead Avenue was not necessary. Of course, if the development is incompatible with the intent and character of the zoning district or with the surrounding uses, it is hard to say that it is in the public interest without some overriding benefit being realized from the development. As noted, compatibility issues are discussed below. . The subdivision will further housing goals and objectives set forth in the YUACP. It will do so consistently with the traffic and transportation elements of the YUACP. Short of a determination that the development presents unmitigated incompatibility, there has been no showing that the subdivision is inconsistent with the public interest b. Common -wall and Duplex Development. Common wall dwelling units and duplex development in the R-1 zoning district are permitted uses for which review is required to promote "compatibility with the intent and character of the district and the objectives of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan." See the permitted use table in YMC 15.04.030 and the definition of Class (2) uses in YMC 15.02.020. Such uses can be denied if, based on the specific circumstances of the application, they are substantially incompatible. The applicant asserts that the common wall structures and duplexes are compatible with the affected R-1 zone and its character because the area is already subject to a mixture of uses, including duplexes and multifamily dwellings immediately to the north and northwest. Furthermore, the applicant notes that the zoning to the north of the property is R-3, and the common wall/duplex development provides a buffer for the benefit of the surrounding detached single family residential neighborhood. There are currently multiple family and duplex residences to the north and northwest of the subject property. Even further, the YUACP, as discussed earlier, provides for infilling and for HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 9 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC INDEX. affordable housing, and the proposed development serves those purposes. Finally, applicant proposes to install a six-foot view -obscuring cedar fence to separate the development from the surrounding detached residential neighborhood, thus further theI minimizing any visual or aesthetic impacts. The neighbors comment that the neighborhood is overwhelmingly detached single family dwellings, and that the proposed development would detract from the existing character of the neighborhood. They further argue that proximity of the proposed development would cause a decline in surrounding property values. The zoning ordinance does not contain specific standards for evaluating compatibility. When no specific standard for evaluating compatibility is provided by the development regulations, the burden of showing incompatibility falls to the local government in the land use decision. See the case of Sunderland Family Treatment Services v. City of Pasco, 127 Wash.2d 7R2, 903 P2d 986 (1995). t},et ce-e because In ruu,� vuJti., because the Pasco Municipal Code did not set forth any standards against which the court could judge the reasonableness of Pasco's denial o f a use permit, : had burden of u the City tidal the or showing why a generally permitted use is inappropriate in the particular case. A finding of incompatibility must be supported substantial evidence. The staff report indicates that determinations of compatibility are based on public comment. However, as the Supreme Court said in Sunderland, unsubstantiated concerns regarding impacts on property values cannot be the basis for a permitting decision. Substantiation could come from substantial evidence of decline in property value. However, actual evidence of any decline in property values that might result from the development is conspicuously absent from the record. In absence of demonstrable property value impacts, there must be evidence that the development detracts from the neighborhood. Certainly, commenters indicated that they moved to the King Street neighborhood with the expectation that detached single family dwellings would define the character of the neighborhood. However, in discussing neighborhood preservation, the YUACP contemplates prevention of commercial and industrial encroachment. Duplexes and similar structures, such as common wall developments are considered in the YUACP to be appropriate low density residential uses. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 10 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC, INDEX #AAvI Disrepair of dwelling units or nuisance conditions are matters of legitimate concern in neighborhood preservation. However, no evidence has been presented that the proposed development would either increase or decrease the likelihood of disrepair. In addition, repair obligations can be addressed by covenants and by landlord rules for rental properties. Neither common wall development nor duplexes necessarily leads to disrepair in any event, and detached single family residences are subject to rental use and related concerns about dwelling unit and landscaping maintenance. Proposed conditions requiring owner -occupied uses only that were suggested at the hearing are not substantiated by the facts. Given the policies for affordable housing and mixed residential development, the burden of showing incompatibility requires some demonstrable interference with surrounding uses. No such demonstration can be made based on the record. Accordingly, there is not substantial evidence showing that the proposed uses, as conditioned, are incompatible with neighboring uses or with the intent and character of the R-1 District. c. Lot Coverage Adjustment. Administrative adjustments pursuant to YMC 15.10.020 are intended to allow for site design flexibility balanced against the general welfare of the neighborhood and community. The requested ten percent lot coverage adjustment is intended to allow the development of duplexes on the same scale as the common wall residences. This is consistent with the coordination of site features with surrounding uses and reflects flexibility of design that responds to the location of the lots proposed for duplex development. The increase in lot coverage has only been objected to in the context that it would facilitate construction of the duplexes. There is no evidence that the modest increase in lot coverage will compromise the intent of the lot coverage standard. As discussed above, there is not evidence that the duplexes as proposed present substantial incompatibility or conflict with the provisions of the YUACP. c. Lot 5 disposition. Much public comment was made regarding potential use of Lot 5 as proposed. No special designation has been made for Lot 5. It is clear that the applicant intends to pursue options other than single family residential use of the lot. Any such uses would be governed by the review requirements set out in Title 15 YMC, HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 11 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC, INDEX # -I at the present time, the jurisdiction of the hearing examiner has not been invoked for review of such uses. This recommendation will not address prospective uses of Lot 5. d. Relationship of City Planning Staff to thepp Alicant. Some - rr commenters expressed concern about the fact that the planner who processed the master application was the tenant of property owned by Pete Olson. While it is may be prudent for persons to be wary of undue influence in decision-making on land use matters, there is no evidence that the staff analysis was in any way affected by the noted landlord -tenant relationshir, The rionrmers ern 4 <t in a fi al .7 -i__._ ._ � _ _ + •+ ...ap.., s� Fm.t.V:s,iu wi 1.13-M e,aoc ALL a �,.,...,,.,. reviuliiiGilUi3.�iUii iJr iieJL�1n ivaiong role in preliminary plat approval or in master application approval in any event. The Hearing Examiner is charged with making the recommendation to the City Council, based on written findings and conclusion after public comment, and the fact ending and decision process is subject to judicial review under the state Land Use Petition Act. From the foregoing findings, the tears g Examiner makes the following CONCLUSIONS I. Pursuant to Chapter 58,17 RCW § 14.30.080 & §1.43.100 YMC the Hearing Examiner is authorized to make a recommendation to the City Council on Master Applications & Preliminary Plats. 2. The preliminary plat of the Hedgewood subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the YUACP, as is consistent with the public interest. 3. The preliminary plat of Hedgewood subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with subdivision design standards and other relevant provisions of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. 4. The preliminary plat of the Hedgewood subdivision, as conditioned, complies substantially with Title 14 YMC (the subdivision ordinance). 5. The proposed Class (2) common wall residential construction and duplex uses, as conditioned, are compatible with the intent and character of the R-1 zoning district and the policies and objectives of the YUACP. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 12 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC- INDEX 6. The proposed administrative adjustment of the lot coverage standard the adjustment and/or reduction is consistent with the purpose of Title 15 YMC, the intent and purposes of the lot coverage standard, and will promote coordination with the surrounding land uses within the subdivision. 7. The component applications of the Master Application, taken together, satisfy the consistency requirements of Chapter 16.06 YMC. From the preceding fmdings and conclusions, the Hearing Examiner makes the following RECOMMENDATION The 28 -lot Plat of Hedgewood, together with proposed Class (2) uses and administrative adjustment, designated by City of Yakima File Nos. Pre Plat #3-05, CL(2) #9-05 and ADM ADJ #8-05, should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The developer shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of- way for the extension of Mead Avenue and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of Hedgewood as depicted upon the applicant's site plan delivered to the City of Yakima on April 29, 2005. 2. An eight -inch sewer main shall be installed in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately S. 69d' Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 70 Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. 3. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximately eleven -foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately S. 69th Ave. to S.7211" Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. 4. An 8 -foot wide public utility easement shall be required showing the location of all existing and proposed sewer stubs. 5. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the City of Yakima Building Codes Division prior to any construction or site preparation on site. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 13 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DO{. INDEX Erosion control measures shall be installed and in place prior to clearing, grading, or construction in accordance with the Department of Washington State Department r----------� (If� F�-.r+o�i�o.gSyJ 's� Erosion Sediment Control P1 Qn regulations 7. A Dust Control Plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. 8. All irrigation lines and easements shall be shown on the face of the plat. 9. All lots shall be served with public water from the Nob Hill Water No individual domestic or irrigation wells shall be permitted for any of the lots. Prior to final plat approval, written verification from Nob Hill Water must be submitted to the Planning Department indicating that all construction providing each lot with domestic water has been completed and fees paid. 10. All public and private utilities shall be located underground, with the exception of telephone heves anti such similar structureC a ---r---- --'--.. �-.,. ...,...�.. ...e....aew.s .gra uva. a.s.i vu. 11. All public and private utilities to be located within public road rights -of- way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction. 12. The fmal plat shall substantially conform to the preliminary plat, except as modified by the City Council. The preliminary plat shall include designation of Lots 1 through 4, Lots 8 through 23, and Lots 25 through 28 $ as common waif single family residence lots. 13. All addresses shall be as specified by the City of Yakima Building Codes Division. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat. 14. The developer shall obtain street name and address assignments from the City of Yakima Building Codes Divisions based on preliminary plat approval. 15. The lots shall be subject to the following notes, which must be placed on the face of the plat: The owners shown hereon, their grantees and assignees in interest hereby covenant and agree to retain all surface water generated within the plat on- site. 16. The developer shall declare a covenant that is binding on the owners of the dwelling units constructed on the property and enforceable by the City of Yakima and other lot owners within the subdivision, and that requires the owners of the dwelling units HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 14 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION DOC INDEX to maintain the dwelling units, accessory structures and landscaping in good repair and free of litter and debris in order to assure the preservation of the character of the neighborhood. 17. A six-foot view -obscuring cedar or similarly constructed fence will be constructed to separate subdivision from the back yards of the surrounding existing residences on the subdivision's east and south boundaries. DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005 HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 15 HEDGEWOOD MASTER APPLICATION .DOC. INDEX EXHIBIT # A-1 FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER A Staff Report DOCUIYIENT DATE Staff Report 8111/05 Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Master Application Open Record Public Hearing August 11, 2005 Master Application ) By Pete Olson on behalf of Frank Baehm ) For the Plat of Hedgewood (28 lots), ) Administrative Adjustment of the Lot Coverage) Standard & Class (2) Review for Lots #6 & #24 ) Coupled with an Environmental Review. ) Location, Vicinity of 48 W. Mead Ave ) Staff Report Pre Plat #3-05, CL(2) #9-05 ADM ADJ #8-05 & EC #19-05 Staff Contact: Jeff Peters Assistant Planner 575-6163 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION. The Division of Environmental Planning recommends approval of this Master Application subject to conditions. FINDINGS APPLICANT. Frank Baehm / Pete Olson 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 LOCATION. This property is located at 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NOS. 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 APPLICATION. Master Application for a Preliminary Long Plat for 26 residential lots, located on approximately 5.94 acres coupled with a Class (2) Review for common wall and duplex construction, Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard & Environmental Review of the entirety of this development. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. This master application concerns a proposal, to subdivide approximately 5.94 acres of property into twenty-eight new lots that range in size from approximately 5,000 to 34,394 square feet. This proposal also includes a Class (2) Review for common wall Single -Family Construction on all lots with the exception of Lots #6,7 and 24. These previously mentioned lots with the exception of Lot #7 are also to be reviewed under the Class (2) Review and Administrative Adjustment processes as two duplexes are proposed on these lots, which require an adjustment of the lot coverage standard by 10% increasing the standard to 55%. Filed Hearing Examiner EXH # Date SAA -5 File # P/ -c Plate #1-05 1 CURRENT ZONING ANI) 1 USE, The current zoning of this property is (R-1) Single -Family -Residential, and the surrounding properties have the following characteristics. Zoning North R-3 Multi -Family Residential South R-1 Single -Family -Residential West R-1 Single -Family -Residential East R-1 Single -Family -Residential IEARLi G EXAMINER JURISDICTION. Pursuant to Chapter 58.17 RCW, § 14.30.080 & §1.43.100 YMC the Hearing Examiner is authorized to make a recommendation to the City Council on Master Applications & Preliminary Plats. Land Use Multi & Single -Family Housing Single -Family Homes Single -Family Homes & Church Single -Family Homes COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. The Future Land Use Map and 1998 Comprehensive Plan designate the subject property as suitable for Low Density Residential development. The Low Density Residential designation can be characterized as primarily single family, detached residencies. Goals of the 1997 Comprehensive Plan include: Goal H3: Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods. Objective G9: Encourage quality design while achieving economic growth patterns. Objective L2: Establish a pattern of development that supports a sense of community. Objective 113.1: Stabilize existing, viable neighborhoods. Policy H1.6.2: Encourage compatible infill of existing neighborhoods to promote lower land development and cost of facilities. URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE. The Urban Area Zoning Ordinance indicates that the Single -Family Residential Zoning District (R-1), is intended to: Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses except those, which are compatible with and serve the residents of this district. The R- 1 district further allows compatible residential development, up to seven dwelling units per acre, in areas served by pubic water and sewer. Furthermore, the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (UAZO) indicates that the construction of duplexes & common wall construction within the Single -Family Residential zoning district are considered Class (2) -land uses. As Class (2) land uses are generally permitted in this particular zoning district and compatibility between Class (2) uses and the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance these types of uses may or may not be considered incompatible at a particular location. Therefore, Class (2) Review by 2 DOC. INDEX the Urban Area Hearing Examiner is required in order to promote compatibility with the intent and character of the district in addition to the objectives and development criteria of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. The Class (2) Review process relies almost entirely upon neighborhood comment to determine what kinds of Class (2) uses are compatible with a particular neighborhood. As Class (2) uses are deemed to be generally compatible with their surroundings and only three negative comment letters were received during the twenty -day open comment period, it can therefore be arguably reasoned that the duplexes and common wall construction for this development can be considered compatible with the surrounding land uses and the Single -Family Residential (R-1) neighborhood that it is proposed to be constructed within. ADJUSTMENT OF STANDARDS. The UAZO, Chapter 58.17 RCW, § 14.30.080 & §1.43.100 YMC authorizes the Urban Area Hearing Examiner, with regards to a Master Application submitted concurrently with a Preliminary Plat, to recommend to the City Council approval of adjustments to certain standards of the ordinance, including lot coverage standards. Such adjustments are intended to allow for site design flexibility balanced against the general welfare of the neighborhood and community. Based upon the five criteria listed in UAZO under chapter 15.10.020 YMC, the requested ten percent lot coverage adjustment conforms in the following ways: 1. Siting for solar access: Does not apply, solar access considerations are not relevant to this adjustment request. 2. Zero Lot Line construction: Does not apply, no residential zero lot line construction is proposed. 3. Coordinate site features with surrounding land uses: The proposed adjustment keeps with the existing land uses in the immediate neighborhood, as a ten percent increase in lot coverage is not a significant change that could cause a probable increased in runoff or cause flooding of neighboring properties. The lot coverage adjustments of Lots 6 and 24 will allow the placement of these two duplexes and coordinate the site with the surrounding land uses by allowing the two structures to be built in a manner, which will match the theme of the development. 4. Flexibility of design: Lot coverage standards for minimum sized lots are oftentimes problematic. The flexibility to fully utilize these lots can oftentimes only be realized and granted through the administrative adjustment process where site plan review coupled with the public comment period work together to insure that all interests are understood and protected. 5. Consistency with sub -area plans: No sub -area plans exist that address this area. 3 DOC. INDEX DEVELOPMENT SER VTrES TEAM (DST) REVIEW. The DST meeting for this proposal was held on June 8, 2005 at which time the following comments were submitted. Engineering Division: This site fronts on S. 72nd Avenue, classified as a Minor Arterial which requires 80 feet of right-of-way, 40 feet on each side of centerline. The existing right-of-way is _ 80 feet and no additional right-of-way is required for this street at this time. This site also has a minimum amount of frontage upon Mead Avenue, which is classified as a local access street requiring at least 50 feet of right-of-way. Currently Mead Avenue does not continue beyond what would be S. 69th or 70th Avenue. The City of Yakima's Title 12 Development Standards §12.06.060A Pattern, specifies that the street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. Furthermore § D &E indicate that "Streets shall be designed to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles and in no case shall streets intersect at an angle of less than eighty degrees." "Local access streets with centerline offset less than one hundred eighty feet shall not be allowed. In accordance with the City of Yakima's Title 12 Development standards Mead Avenue is required to be extended from its current terminus at approximately 70th Avenue to S. 72nd Avenue. This "street development is required to be done in accordance with the provisions of the City of Yakima Engineer as described below. The of the properties will dedicate the needed property to extendMead Avenuefrom70th Avenue to 72nd Avenue. This would include removing the existing structure at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue and constructing a roadway extension for the proposed Mead Avenue. The City would assist this development by installing the needed traffic signalization along with the construction of a left turning lane and sidewalk, curb, andgutter needed to n,,.,,.,,d accommodate the turning lane. The City's portion would be estimated to be about 150 feet of sidewalk, curb, and gutter, along with t -L... _ r the the portion of the turning lane of about the same length. The developer of this property would be required to either construct the remaining improvements or bond with the City to construct the needed improvements. Plans and specifications would need to be approved by the City Engineering staff before construction. The City staff would also inspect the construction of these improvements. The City intends to construct this signal system in the near future. If the development of these parcels does not take place before the signal system is installed, the developer will be required to complete the improvements required to develop the property by extending Mead Avenue from 70th to 72nd Avenue, including the left turn lane and an additional signal pole system to accommodate a 4th leg of the intersection. This would need to be done entirely at the developer's expense, if developed after the City completes this project. The benefits described above are available if the developer agrees to facilitate installing the signal system needed for this intersection by following the above stipulated requirements for this property development."2 2 Letter from City of Yakima Engineer to Real-estate Agent Harold Race Dated December 15, 2004. 4 DOC. �I}NDEX 7f Av Traffic Division: 1. Traffic Engineering recommends that both the extension of Mead Avenue and the new street, labeled as S. 71st Avenue and Hedgewood Court be constructed with sidewalks and barrier curb. The only exception to this recommendation is the hammerhead turnaround at the terminus of Hedgewood Court. Barrier curb along the edge of sidewalk will discourage vehicles from parking on top of the sidewalk, creating a safer pedestrian environment. 2. South 72nd Avenue is a four -lane Minor Collector street that carries an average of 9,850 Average Daily Vehicles (2004 Count), with Level of Service "A" (free-flowing conditions). Mead Avenue (west of 72nd Avenue) is a Local Access Street, which serves a residential neighborhood, and the West Valley Middle/Junior High Schools. At the intersection of Mead Avenue and South 72nd Avenue a total of 8 vehicle collisions were reported to the Yakima Police in the three years between 2002, 2003 and 2004 3. Summary of Impact to City of Yakima Arterial Streets: This application has been reviewed and approved for consistency with YMC 12.08 Transportation Capacity Management Ordinance. This development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City Arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted streets. This review does not include any site development or safety issues which may be discussed at the project level or SEPA review. Building Codes Division: No building code issues at this time. Life Safety Division: Fire hydrants to be installed per Nob Hill Water Companies standards. Water/Irrigation Division: This Plat lies within the Nob Hill Water Companies service area. Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority: If the project includes any work that would disturb soil stability, it is subject to the requirement to submit a dust control plan. A construction dust plan must be filled with and approved by, YRCAA. The dust control plan needs to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases, per § 3.08A of YRCAA Regulations. The proponent is also encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for projects planned now and in the future. Department of Ecology: Erosion control measures must be in place prior to clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be able to prevent soil from being carried into surface water (this includes storm drains) by storm water runoff. A storm water construction permit from the Washington State Dept. of Ecology may be required if there is a potential for discharge from a construction site larger than one acre. A Storm water pollution Prevention Plan (Erosion Sediment Control Plan is needed for all permitted construction sites. Building Code Addressing: Lot 1: 7001. W Mead Ave. Lot 2: 7005 W Mead Ave. Lot 3: 7009 W Mead Ave. Lot 4: 7013 W Mead Ave. Lot 5: 7101 W Mead Ave. 5 DOC. INDEX Lot 6: Lot 7: Lot 8: Lot 9: Lot 10: Lot 11: Lot 12: Lot 13: Lot 14: Lot 15: Lot 16: Lot T _� 1.7: 1: Lot 18: Lot 19: Lot 20: Lot 21: Lot 22: Lot 23: Lot 24: Lot 25: Lot 26: Lot 27: Lot 28: 7118 W Mead Ave ?r 1 501 S, 72nd Ave. (Depending on Access). GLe53). 7114 W Mead Ave or 1505 c, 72nd Ave. 7110 W Mead Ave. 7106 W. Mead Ave. 1502 S_ 71' Ave, 1506 S. 72nd Ave. 1510 S. 72nd Ave. 1514 S. 71St Ave. 1518 S. 71St Ave. 7018 Loren Pl.. 7014 Loren Pl.. 7010 Loren P1.. 7006 Loren Pl.. 7002 Loren P1.. 7001 Loren Pl.. 7005 Loren Pl 7009 Loren Pl.. 7013 Loren Pl.. or 1505 S. 70 Ave. (Depending on Access). 1501 S. 71St Ave. or 7016 W. Mead Ave. (Depending on Access). 7012 W. Mead Ave. 7008 W. Mead Ave. 7004 W. Mead Ave. 7000 W. Mead Ave. (ATI, DTJP; E) S WOULD uSE TJNff NUMBERS OF ##1-2) SUBDIVISION. This preliminary subdivision indicates that all lots will have meet the proper street access standards, be provided with the necessary public utilities, exceed the minimum lot size for common wall construction and meet or exceed the minimum lot width of 50 feet as measured at the rear of the required front yard setback. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. On June 16, 2005 a Preliminary Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued by the City of Yakima for this proposal. Following the twenty -day public comment period where no person(s) objected or commented the City of Yakima issued it's Final MDNS On July 8, 2005. No appeals were filed within the fifteen -day appeal period following the issuance of the Final MDNS. The Final MDNS was conditioned upon the following information and mitigating measures: Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima' s Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead DOC. INDEX 6 Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. The Growth Management Act requires that all new development provide for adequate street extensions and infrastructure necessary to ensure safe passage to and from schools. In addition, this development also supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave to provide adequate traffic circulation within the City of Yakima's street grid. Based upon the above criteria the following. conditions were required through the substantive authority derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mitigation: All mitigation, dedication and site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer and Traffic Engineer. 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapters 12.05 thru 12.06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69 Ave to the intersection of S. 7211d Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72m Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastruc. e rior INDEX 7 to the specified time thedeveloper shall i ivLail all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dunt Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima lma Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY. Traffic Capacity Analysis was completed on July 20, 2005 and indicates that this development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City's arterial street system and that reserve capacity exists on all streets impacted by this development. PUBLIC NOTICE. Public notice for this application and hearing was provided in accordance with the notice requirements of: Title 14, Subdivision; Title 15, Zoning, Title 6.88, Environmental Policy and Title 16, Development Permit Regulations. Notice of Application and Hearing: Property Posting: Legal Notice: June 16, 2005 May 20, 2005 June 16, 2004 PUBLIC COMMENTS. Three negative comment letters were received during the 20 -day open comment period and given due consideration in the preparation of this report. C'--.-' .iivTSivt�ITS: 1. This recommendation is based upon the project narrative and site plan received April 29, 2005. 2. The hearing examiner has jurisdiction to render a recommendation to the City Council on this matter. 3. For the reasons stated herein, this preliminary subdivision complies with the objectives of the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, the intent of the (R-1) Single -Family Residential zoning district, the provisions of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Title 12 Development Standards Ordinance and the Traffic Concurrency Ordinance. 4. This application's request for common wall and duplex type construction can be considered to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood due to the lack of a significant number of negative public comments, 5. This application meets Administrative Adjustment criteria #3 site flexibility and criteria #4 coordination of site features with the surrounding land uses thus meeting the requirements for an adjustment to be granted. (UAZO 15.10.020) 8 DOC. INDEX 6. During project review it has been found that this request is in compliance with YMC 16.06.020 (B) for making a Determination of Consistency as follows: A. The proposed uses and construction are permitted within the Single -Family Residential zone upon Class (2) Review and approval. (YMC 15.04 Table 4-1) B. All necessary public facilities are or will be available to serve this site. (YMC 14.05.020, 14.15.020 & 14.15.030) C. This proposal is consistent with existing development regulations for this location and or will be adjusted. (YMC 14.05.020, 14.15.020 & 14.15.030) 7. A Final MDNS was issued for this project on July 8, 2005. (YMC 6.88) No appeals were made. 8. Traffic Capacity Analysis indicates that this development Will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City's arterial street system and that reserve capacity exists on all streets impacted by this development. 9. The developer is required to dedicate and develop the street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. (YMC12.06.060 A, D&E) 10. The developer is also required to install or bond on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD to include a five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, under Chapter 12.05 thru 12.06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. 11. An eight -inch sewer main is required to be installed or bonded for in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71St Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. 12. An 8 -foot wide public utility easement is required showing the location of all sewer stubs. (YMC 12.02.010) 13. All domestic water for this development is required to be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. 14. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximately eleven -foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately S. 69th Ave. to S.72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. (YMC 12.05& 12.06) 9 DOC, INDEX 15. All irrigation liYes and easements are requiredto be shown on the face of the piai.(Yiii: 14.20.050) 16. Erosion control measures are required to be installed and in place prior to Clearing, grading, or construction in accordance with the Departr ent of Washington ._ _. _ _ St_l_ 1-wiJGLLL111Gdd6 VY dJlllIlgWI! JldLG Department of Ecology's Erosion Sediment Control Plan regulations. 17. A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. 18. All public notices were provided as required. (YMC 14.20.080) RECOMMENDATION. The Division of Environmental Planning therefore recommends that this Master Application for a 28 -Lot subdivision known as Hedgewood, Class (2) Review for duplex / common wall constriction and an Administrative Adjustment of the lot coverage standard be approved. A listing of the usual conditions applied to plats follows recommendation. conditions applied e., long lvuvw� this 1. The developer shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the -- extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. (YMC12.06.060A, D&E) 2. The developer shall also install or bond on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD to include a five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, under Chapter 12.05 thra 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. An eight -=inch sewer main shall be installed in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately S. 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. 4. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximately eleven -foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately S. 69th Ave. to S.72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. (YMC 12.05& 12.06) 5. An 8 -foot wide public utility easement shall be required showing the location of all existing and proposed sewer stubs. (YMC 12.02.010) 10 DOC. INDEX 6. All domestic water for this development shall be installed in accordance with Nob Hill Water Co. standards. 7. The applicant shall also obtain a grading permit from the City of Yakima Building Codes Department prior to any construction or site preparation on site. 8. Erosion control measures shall be installed and in place prior to clearing, grading, or construction in accordance with the Department of Washington State Department of Ecology's Erosion Sediment Control Plan regulations. 9. A Dust Control Plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. 19. All irrigation lines and easements shall be shown on the face of the plat. .(YMC 14.20.050) 11 DOC. INDEX EXFIIBIT # B-1 FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER B Maps DOCUMENT DATE Maps: Mailing, Vicinity, Aerial, Zoning and Atlas 5/13/05 1 W VIOLA AVE Barely Ln _ STD DA AVE ZIER RD PERRY ST t.0 —STREF LANE — — — _ PERRY CT 818TH 41. _ TERRY AVE CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON FILE NO: PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05 & EC#19-05 APPLICANT: FRANK BAEHM REQUEST: 28 -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH COMMON WALL LOTS & DUPLEXES & E LOCATION: 1419 S. 72ND AVENUE PARCEL NUMBER(S):1 8 1 3 2 94 3 0 1 1 181 Filed 3 2 12 tifsaring Examiner EXH #A -L- Date 5:5 File N Notified Property Owners within 500 Ft Ati Subject Site Sc 200 400 LNGPLT-3-0505/13/05 Noes= Vv VIOLA AVE nm u w MEAD AVE STORM AVE ./Tr\ S 72ND AVE Barely Ln IIIA Gregory Plaoe LOGAN AVE 1- m -17 MEAD AVE 1 1 W C Q PERRY ET CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON VICINITY MAP HLE NO: PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05 & EC#19-05 APPLICANT: FRANK BAEHM REQUEST: 28 -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH COMMON WALL LOTS & DUPLEXES & ENVIRON. REVIEW LOCATION: 1419 S. 72ND AVENUE 1T k4 Subj ect Property . Yakima City LimitF Scale -lin = 400ft 0 200 4%QX/5 0(5,0S/13/05 IJ INDE)C _I 1 Pr: PEARS CT 171". 1177?"- .t;77 Lii lit - - STRE IF LA -NE -4L- , . CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Information Services - GIS HLE NO: PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05 & EC#19-05 APPLICANT: FRANK BAEHM REQUEST: 28 -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH COMMON WALL LOTS & DUPLEXES & ENVIRON. REVIEW LOCATION: 1419 S. 72ND AVENUE Scale —lin = 400ft 0 200 400 N Subject Property Yakima City Limits LNGPLT-3-05 05/13/05 PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05 & EC#19-05 FRANK BAEHM 28 -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH COMMON WALL! No gp9s & DUPLEXES & ENVIRON. REVIEW S. 72ND AVENUE ♦* Subject Property City Limits SR Suburban Residential R-1 Single -Family Residential R-2 Two -Family Residential R-3 Multi -Family Residential B-1 Professional Business B-2 Local Business IR Historical Business SCC Small Convenience Center LCC Large Convenience Center CBD Central Business District CBDS CBD Support M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial I r ZIER RD MEAD AVE iQ ,p CI CO I, W CO 1 iL: Q`_ PIERCE ST w z n a) Sorely Ln Gregory Place - LOGAN AVE _. W I< 6C JH 0 N' MEAD AVE • 8�o 1 a� y m PIERCE CT % W KING ST r a., — ;• m m CO Q , % f �O m y % S 68TH F, % a) PERRY CT yG —-- PIERCE ST Scale -lin = 400ft 0 200 400 LNGPLT-3-05 City of Yakima, Washington May 13, 2005 PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05 & EC#19-05 AVE 1406 1501 1500 1503 1502 1505 1504 1507 1506 1509 1508 1511 1510 1513 1512 1501 1503 1506 1507 1509 1511 1515 1514 1513 w — — u a 1601 1600 > 1691 p — < — oC 1- 2 n 31605 co 1603 1602 3 _—_- 4 ry 1605 1605 1604 et —1897 1317 6901 6921 6917 6833 6831 6821 6831 1425 LOGAN AVE 1420 1424 1428 S 69TH AVE 1421 1424 1425 1429 1426 1433 1432 1437 1436 1441 S 68TH AVE 1421 1425 1429 1433 1437 1440 1440 MEAD AVE 1521 1522 1505 1526 1521 1525 Q 1529 1529 1534 1533 1534 0~0 1533 1507 7007 7003 1534 1538 1537 1537 w — _ -_ 1538 1515 SCO 1507 1542 Q 1541 7004 1508 rt I- --I 1509 1 I- --I 1545 1542 1546 — co 1517 7101 7007 7005 7003 7100 • 7006 7004 7002 5909 : 1550 1549 6631 6821 W KING ST 1601 1606 1605 1602 6706 1803 ---- — 1604 1605 Current Zoning CURRENT ZONING SR Suburban Residential R-1 Single -Family Residential R-2 Two -Family Residential III R-3 Multi -Family Residenual 13-1 Professional Business ■ 8-2 Local Business HB Histoncal Business SCC Small Convenience Center ■ LCC Large Convenience Center ■ CBD Central Business District CBDS CBD Support M-1 Light Industrial ■ M-2 Heavy Industrial Af Subject Site AD AV CO S 72ND AVE 8 WILLDW PtACE(P- Vr ROAD) CO _ _ Q 1 0 -- — 8- 1 2 J of - cp LOGAN AVE 0. W iQINGST 1 7 - ----- -- — 1 2 -mss Yakima Water & Sewer Water Line NSewer Lines Imgation Main FILE NO: PRE LNG PLT#3-05, CL121#S-05 a. EC#15- APPLICANT: FRANK BAEHM AVE w WILLOW PLACE (PVT. ROAD) w wAt SCO LOGAN AVE --- LU Q • Q = CO (D CO MEAD AVE W KING ST S 68TH AVE Future Land Use FUTURE LAND USE Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Professional Office ■ Neighborhood Commercial Large Convenience Center Arterial Commercial ■ CBD Core Commercial Industrial Urban Reserve Alf Subject Site Digital Orthophoto Mosaic of Digital Orthophotography flown 08/01/2002 iySubject Property CITY OF YAKIMA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone: (5091575-6113 Fax: 1509)575-6105 All maps shown at 1" = 300ft One page Atlas: Ingplt-3-05 Created: May 13, 2005 EXHIBIT # C-1 FRANK BREI NI EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER C Design Services Team Comments DOCUMENT DATE C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 Request for Comments 5/23/05 Agencies Contacted 5/23/05 Comments from Jerry Robertson, City Code Enforcement 5/23/05 Comments from Max Linden, City Wastewater/Utilities 5/26/05 Comments from Scott Schafer, City Wastewater/Utilities 5/31/05 Comments from Casey Rice, City Engineering Comments from Carolyn Belles, City Code Enforcement 6/8/05 6/9/05 Comments from Les Ornelas, Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority Notice of Decision for Transportation Concurrency Analysis from Joan Davenport, City Traffic Engineering 6/10/05 7/21/05 July 21, 2005 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2301 Fruitvale Blvd., Yakima, Washington 98902 Phone (509) 575-6005 Pete Olson PO Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Subject: Notice of Decision for Transportation. Concurrency Analysis Hedgewood Plat, Vicinity of 1419 S 7211d Ave, Yakima, WA Dear Applicant, Enclosed is the Decision for the Transportation Concurrency Analysis of the 28 -Lot Plat, to be known as "Hedgewood" in the vicinity of 1419 South 72nd Avenue, within the City of Yakima, Washington. This development has been APPROVED for Concurrency Analysis. Concurrency review determined that reserve capacity is available on all impacted arterial streets. Concurrency review does not evaluate impact to local access streets or street intersections. This review does not include safety or site design issues which will be addressed at the project review level of zoning and SEPA. This review concluded that the proposed development will not exceed the capacity of the arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted arterial streets. Please review the enclosed report. You may appeal the Findings of this report or request Administrative Reconsideration within fifteen (15) days from the date of mailing of this Notice. Appeal forms and procedures are available at the Department of Community and Economic Development. If you have any questions, please me call at (509)576-6417. Sincerely, Davenport upervising Traffic Engineer enclosure copy: Chris Wilson, City Planning Division Alice Klin, City Code Division Filed Hearing Examin - EXH #=�._._ Date ell ds File # Ott bot1 -0� Administration 575-6005 • Equipment Rental 575-6005 • Parks & Recreation 575-6020 • Refuse 575-6005 Street 575-6005 • Traffic 575-6005 • Transit 575-6005 Yaki a 111 19! City of Yakima, Washington Traffic. Division n f PT, hue Works Department Transportation Concurrency Analysis Date of Review: July 20, 2005 Review Prepared by: Joan Davenport, Supersing Traffic Engineer gineer (576-b411) -0-- P Development: Olson Plat of 28 Lots for Single Family Housing Units Subject Address: 1419 South 72nd Ave ITE Land Use Category: LU #210, Single Family Detached and Day Care* Calculation: 27 Units *I .0-1 PM Peak Hr Trips per Unit = 27. *Day Care was reviewed previously under separate application Expected Net PM Peak Hour Trip Generation: 27 PM Peak Hour trips Snmmary of Impact: The applicant Pete Olson proposes to c reate a 2g -lot development, to be known as "Hedgewood Plat" for a total of 27 single family housing units and one day care in the vicinity of 1419 South 72/4 Avenue. The day care facility was reviewed under a separate application for Transportation Concurrency April 15, 2005. The Plat proposes construct to Mead Avenue between 69th and 72nd Avenues. All traffic from this new development will enter the Arterial Street system on 72nd Avenue from the new development andMead Avenue (not atCity 7 � classified this location, o� Yakima Administrative procedures for Concurrency Analysis use the PM Peak hour trip of the adjacent street for the selected land use category. The site -generated traffic is distributed to the Arterial street sections noted below, based upon the City policy to assess impacts for two Arterial street segments. Estimated distribution of the site -generated trips is shown on the table below. Based upon actual data, City of Yakima Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour are assessed as 8.7% of total Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Peak hour reserve capacity includes any vehicle trips previously assigned under the Concurrency Ordinance. City of Yakima Transportation Concurrency assesses arterial street segment capacity only and does not address intersection capacity. Seg Streit Se— eat 205 Nob ][ill Blvd: 80th - 72nd Ave Total ADT PM PK PK HR New Total Hr Reserve Dev. PM Con - ADT Cap. PK ER currency p Impact Trips Resulting Pm Pk lir Capacity TflS WC (WC Ratio) 6,300 548 1,052 206 Nob Hill Blvd: 72nd Ave - 64th Ave 8,200 713 887 207 Washington Ave: 72nd - 64th Ave 5,400 470 1,130 209 Zia Rd:80th - 72nd Ave 212 5 152 1,047 0.44 A 1 10 32 877 0.47 A 72nd Ave: Nob Hill Blvd - Zier Rd 211 72nd Ave: Tieton Dr - Nob Hill Blvd 213 80th Ave: Zier Rd - Washington 2,900 9,800 11,330 5,092 10 60 1,120 0.33 A 252 1,348 1 36 1,347 0.18 A a31 A 986 2,614 7 247 2,607 rs,34 A 443 1,147 12 12 1,135 0.28 A 853 2,347 27 132 2,320 Summary of Impact to City of Yakima Arterial Streets: This application has been reviewed and approved for consistency with YMC 12.08 Transportation Capacity Management Ordinance. This development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City Arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted streets. This review does not include any site development or safety issues which may be discussed at the project elk or SEPA review, INDEX Transportation Capacity Analysis Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED City of Yakima, Washington APR 2 9 2005 TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY ANALYSIS CITY OF YAKIMA • PLANNING DIV The Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070) requires all new development to be consistent with the existing or planned street system capacities. The City of Yakima adopted Yakima Municipal Code Section 12.03 to .implement this local requirement. The information provide with this application will be used to estimate the impact of your develo ment upon the u Peak Hour traffic on the' City of Yakima arterial streets p p PM APPLICATION INFORMATION Applicant Name: PES 'OLSa ) Contact Person: 731e.. L Mailing Address: Project Address: Parcel Number: tiM}.ate.;, :llL 0RZ 0.4,,3 R'D A), 2 el / 4'/q Sv4.71-1 T • FEE: $250 (Receipt # ) $ /3 z,q .- 30// .d /8/331- /zao3 =�1e0oJf++:e'w:R ,..lair':+T+94`�': Number of Units .2- - 24 Housing Type: (single family, Apartment, condo, MHP) — Special Population: (Assisted Living, Nursing Home, etc Other: (Day Care, Church, etc) Describe Gross Floor Area: _Parking Spaces: (Required/Provided) _Number of Employees u�;;,-,li;d; • Describe Gross Floor Area: Parking Spaces: (Required/Provided) Number of Employees Project Description: f %� s. /5 Tr) Sada/t//0� � -4 s _/NTD Z� GoTS. *****PLEASE ATTACH A SITE PLAN***** Submit this form , attachments and fee to the City permit Center, Yakima City Hall,129 North Second Street, Yakima, Washington, 98901. You will receive a Notice of Decision explaining the Findin s of this analysis. Please review the Decision when it is sent to you, as there is a limited time period for Request for Reconsideration or Appeal. Questions? Contact the City of Yakima Public Works Traffic Division 2301 Fruitvale Boulevard Yakima, WA 98902 Phone: 509/575-6005 DOC. INDEX ,# MN SEC. 20, T-13 N. R-16 E.NY Y.C.P,W. CASED LION. SEE 102 1 M-1130 (NOT VISITED) LOT 7 1 w ,7 PROPOSED PLAT OF PARCEL A 1NE NORTH HALF OF THE IVEST TI132,THUARRTER,NOTHEUATO{ OF SECTION TOWNSSI13MEDV WOOD NAL iHMEST QUARTER, SOUTHWEST OV 62 FEET ILEGAL DESCfPTIONS CF THE SOU /a1D THE SOUTH 124. ER, SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 113 NORTH, RANCE 1a EAST W,N, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 145 FEET OF THE VEST 240 FEET 1HEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT 90911014 DESCRIBED AS F0.' LOWS5 (BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER SOUTNNEST QUARTER SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TONNSHB• 13 NORTH, RANGE 16 EAST, W.M,; THINCE 12u622 95514TMTHENCE SOUTHT5904 ALONGHE P AUEL 041)4 111E SOUTH UNE OF SND 5UBO1 15'ON, 4001 FEET, TO TIE EAST UNE OF FOR ROAD RICHTAT OF PORTION 01 AUDITOR'S EYED � �A1 320 AND Ta70 AND THE TRUE POINT OF TINUIN 50UTH 66.34' 0' EAST, 390.00 FEET:THENCE CONTHENCE SOUTH 103'20' EAST 99.61 FEET TO A POINT SITUATE 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID 5U90315I 9 THENCE NORTH 5934'10' NEST, PARALLEL TO SAO SOUTH UNE, 150.29 FEET( THENCE 609111 07550' EAST. 5.00 F(E71 THENCE NORTH 69.34'10' NEST, 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH FA40077 0 ST '• OF 111E NEST UNE CFI SATO S1180IWSC144ATHENCE NORT H 10300• NEST, 229.37 FEET TO THE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEVE0 TO YAgNA COUNTY 909 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S 91LE NO.'S 1315320, 35391(76 A140 3039577, PARCEL 8 THAT POR110N OF THE SOUTH 124.62 FEET OF THE SOUIHVEST QUARTER. SOUTHNEST CHARTER,' OF OEC I00 45 NNSHIPWWS' ' NORTH, RNT4CE ISR EAST, CNARTER N,1 - 00061y AT THE 501J7NNE5T CORNER OF SAO SUBpWSION; • &R21dI,1( N 113'70' VEST, V40140,2146 TART UNE, THEREOF, CAW. 124311 '11404CE SOUTH 9034';b'' 7 ' 4,44k E NTH11404 UNE OF SAID SU8O4151DN, 40.01 FEET, TO THE EAST •OFTHAT PORTION CONVEYER) TO YMOAA COUNTY FOR- 10 RIGHT OF, WAY 07 AU010R';44ilE N0. 1315320 ANO 64 AND: THE UE PONT TO BEIANNINCI THENCE • C0NTI 19 'Sarni 6099''34'10" EAST. 300 EDI mace • ' SCJ. 103'20' EAST, 99.61'FEET TO A' PONT SITUATE 25.00 FEET TN OF THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID 0560M5039 NORTH 89'3490' NEST PAWN- TO SAN SOUTH, LINE,' 9.29 FEED THENCE NORTH 02350' EAST, 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH '69'34'10"VEST, 170.64 FEET? THRICE NORTH 45011116. NEST, 42,97 FEET) TO A POINT SITUATE 40.00 FEET EAST'9F THE NEST LNE•OF SMD 5UBOINy039 THENCE NORTH 15:26" Scat 226.37 FELT 10 THE TRUE PONT OF BEONNINQ LOT 16VL0W loam fLOT A / LOT 4 40' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY' 09'34'10" E 050.19" LOT f l'F*9 10. P. S. 56108WT N wax 6 ION DP 10' 1 9919 87 828 sa06 69 WPM 20' ►1.110 RINOE00 6051 ID 965 NU NC 7256476 1 1969,4T SE CDR. SEC 29, NE COT DEC 32, 1-13 N, 9-10 EWA • BRASS CAP SEE LCR 2 4-647 4 (NOT 1151150) 5 59'39'25' E • 240.06' W t N NOTES ACEN. SEC. 32, T --13 N,R-15E,W44 7..CP.W CA5E0 3109, SEE LCR 7124149 2 I, L075 6, 7 ANO 24 ARE NUE FAMILY LOTS. Ts 6, 7 ARC 24 ARE LARGE 'ENCU(i{ 001TDUPLA, ALL OTHER LOTS ARE EZRO LOT LII'E 60111 ;L EXI511/40 HOUSE Od PROPERTY WU. EITHER BE REM07TA FROM SITE OR Mown T `SED LOT 6, 7 OR 24. 4. STORM WATER 7 EATED BY NEW IIPERVIOU5 SURFACES BILL , A CN SITE 5. SOUTH 72110 AVM IS SO' AWE, FACE TO FACE, CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER ASPHALT STREET INTR CII6r24 re w n..i.. NOTES iCOtrTPAIED1 7. DOMESTIC WATER 51 PROVIDED 0Y 8' IY0 W1L WATER 95143.. tD 0O SIEGT TO MG EEYER, CONNECT T4 095110 WATER I �r Awe arms S 43 �� S YAAKIIIA, WA9WNGTDTt' ING i ��= �'�'�__ 15091 575-5090 + a 6a • RECEIVED An 21 79gT 111!1aMEAN NANafC erv, 120 196 oNsammil SCALE 1 akima Regional �C�lre�an Air Authority June 10, 2005 JUN 1 4 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Six So. Second St., Suite 1016, Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509)834-2050, Fax: (509)834-2060 http://www.co.yakima.wa.us/cleanair Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner City of Yakima Development Services Team 129 N 2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 RE: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM ADJ #8-05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson Dear Mr. Peters: We apologize for the lateness of our comment. Our comment on UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM ADJ #8-05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson for Pete Olson, on behalf of Frank Baehm, to long plat approximately 5.17 acres into 28 lots located at 1419 S 72nd Ave in Yakima, WA follows: Dust Control If the project includes any work that would disturb soil stability, it is subject to the requirement to submit a dust control plan. A construction dust plan must be filed with, and approved by, YRCAA. The dust control plan needs to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases, per §3.08A of YRCAA Regulations. Proponent is also encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for projects planned now and in the future. The fee for a Master Construction Dust Control Pian is $226. Sincere) es • rnelas Air Pollution Control Officer /chasm/wpfiles/permitting/SEPA/City_of_Yakima/Peters_UAZO_PLP_304_10Ju n05 DOC. INDEX CM( i1+ 3CAt iMt€ REQUEST FOR COMtvIENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAL' May 73, 2005 City of Ya ,..D,.eveiopment Services Team eff Peters, Assistant Planner SECT: IT 05, Frank Baehmz 1 Pete Olson JUN 092005I Cm/ 0F PLAN G n MA CARROLYN BELLES -• r. CODES 3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM ADJ. #8 - PROPOSAL: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Resideirtiall zonedproperty into 28 lots ranging in size from 5000 to 6000 square, In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow common wall duplex construction and an Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in. lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. r LOCATION: 1419 R. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011, 181332-12003 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at they DST�meet nt g tregarding be held June 8.2005 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your commentsrior to the meeting. jpeters@ci.yakii,•,a_wa.us and the PlanningP g _ My e-mail address is Depaent's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6163. CONI PNre • r jI awl/0M Contact 576 7 - g'..166/ Department 1 Agency June 9, 2005 Preliminary Addressing for Hedgewood Plat Vic. Of W Mead Ave. & S 72nd Ave. Pete Olson/Frank Baehm Preliminary addressing established by Carolyn Belles, City of Yakima, 576-6656 cbelles@ci.yakima.wa.us Lot 1: Lot 2: Lot 3: Lot 4: Lot 5: Lot 6: Lot 7: Lot 8: Lot 9: Lot 10: Lot 11: Lot 12: Lot 13: Lot 14: Lot 15: Lot 16: Lot 17: Lot 18: Lot 19: Lot 20: Lot 21: Lot 22: Lot 23: Lot 24: Lot 25: Lot 26: Lot 27: Lot 28: 7001 W Mead Ave. 7005 W Mead Ave. 7009 W Mead Ave. 7013 W Mead Ave. 7101 W Mead Ave. 7118 W Mead Ave. 1505 S 72nd Ave. 7110 W Mead Ave. 7106 W Mead Ave. 1502 S 71st Ave. 1506 S 71st Ave. 1510 S 71St Ave. 1514 S 71stAve. 1518 S 71st Ave. 7018 Loren Pl.. 7014 Loren Pl.. 7010 Loren Pl. 7006 Loren Pl.. 7002 Loren Pl.. 7001 Loren Pl.. 7005 Loren Pl.. 7009 Loren Pl. 7013 Loren Pl.. 1501 S 71st Ave. 7012 W Mead Ave. 7008 W Mead Ave. 7004 W Mead Ave. 7000 W Mead Ave. OR 1501 S 72nd Ave. (depending on access) OR7114 WMeadAve. OR 7102 W Mead Ave. (depending on access) OR 1505 S 71' Ave. (depending on access) OR 7016 W Mead Ave. (depending on access) (Duplexes would use unit numbers of #1-2) C: Pete Olson, POB 8021 Yakima WA 98908 Frank Baehm, 1419 S 7211d Ave. Rick Weir, PLSA Engineering, 1120 W Lincoln Ave. 'DOC.' INDEX 1 1 1 Com.' .y1 .r bflOgm I i4 Q t CEN. SEC. 29, QT-13 N, R-18 E,WN Y.C.P.W. CASED UON. SEE LCR 1 M-1130 (NOT NSTED) LOT 1 PROPOSED PLAT nF ! n l /l�ifiv- HEDOEW000 0,,P I LOT2 *SLOW LOTS I LOT 4 8934'10° E 656.19' I LOT L0T S -0 P. S. EASEMENT —".172' 40'P.S. - EASEMENT u) ISS'— 7330 5 NOTES 621997 . .1 woo 57 1 364 50' 1 5699 51 S 691915° E ° 240.06' • _ Q 578 1 v1 240.08' irp CEN. SEC, 32, �AT13N,R-13�W4 Y.C.P.W CASED MON. SEE LCR 7124149 1. LOTS 6. 7 AND 24 ARE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. 2. LOTS 8. 7 AND 34 ARE LARGE BIOUG'H FOR DUPLEXES. Alt. OTHER LOTS ARE ZERO LOT UNE LOTS, 3. COSTING HOUSE ON PROPERTY V LL EITHER BE REMOVED FROM SITE OR MOVED TO PROPOSED LOT 8, 7 OR 24. 4. STORM WATER DRAINAGE CREATED BY NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE 5. SOUTH 72ND AVENUE IS 50' WIDE, FACE TO FACE', CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ASPHALT STREET WITH SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES. MEAD AVENUE IS 36' WIDE, FACE TO FACE, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER A_SPHAI,T STREET WITH NO SIDEWALKS. 6. SANITARY SEWER Lq PRomnlil Av m' INT'V 693915° E i J 1 NOTES {CONTINUED} Fele' 345 8 5' 7( 1 =STA7lr 7. DOMESTIC WATER IS PROVIDED BY 8° NOB HIM WATER mokiNS. m CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER. el CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER. OWNED FRANK BAEHM 1419 S. 72 ND AVENUE DOD. INDEX DEVELOF R PETE OLSC4 P.O. BOX 802.1 4 SURVEYC RICK WEHR PLSA ENC N DST June 8, 2005 File# 05.06.04 Planner: J. Peters Engineering: C. Rice Engineering Comments: 1. Title 12 Standards will apply to this development site 2. Submit a set of detail plans by a licensed Civil Engineer to the city Engineer's office for review 3. Relocate the existing Water Sewer alignment on Hedgewood Ct 4. All Storm Water will be retained onsite 5. Install a barrier curb and gutter on Mead Ave 6. Rolled curb will be acceptable on S. 70 Ave and Hedgewood Ct 7. Require a separate sewer lateral to each unit address *Note this is to addition to all comments previously made by City Engineer . DOC. INDEX # �' Proposal: 28 Lots and Common Wall Duplexes Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave Parcel # 191329-43011 181332-12003 Engineering Comments: 1. Title 12 Standards will apply to this development site 2. Submit a set of detail plans by a licensed Civil Engineer to the city Engineer's office for review 3. Relocate the existing Water Sewer alignment on Hedgewood Ct 4. All Storm Water will be retained onsite 5. Install a barrier curb and gutter on Mead Ave 6. Rolled curb will be acceptable on S. 70 Ave and Hedgewood Ct 7. Require a separate sewer lateral to each unit address *Note this is to addition to all comments previously made by City Engineer . DOC. INDEX # �' CJTY_ ox_ y_ A_T,111.1 , REQUEST FOR CQMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM RECEIVED MAY 3 1 2005 CITY OF YAKIM' PLANNING DIV. MayA..., leeAA May fIZOM • SCOTT SCHAFER City of Yalrim TieV elop int Services Team W A .STEW A TE12 /T TTTT .TTTF S Jeff Peters; Assistant Planner SUBJECT: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM AD' #8- 05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson. +R®rlSA_" Long Plat of approximately 5.17 .17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property into 28 lots ranging in size from 5000 to 6000 square. In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow mullion wall duplex construction and an Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NINIBE1RS: 181329-43011, 181332-12003 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held June 8i 2005 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but fmd you .are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting My e-mail address is jpeters@ci.yalcinaa.wa.us and the Planning Dep a ment's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6163. COMMENTS: 1�JQ Co Ai(i& rr3 - WASTE J/ TAY Z Department / Agency INDEX CITY OF YAKIMA REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM May 23, 2005 TO: ity o Services r-FROIVIF JeffPeters, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM AD' #8- 05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson PROPOSAL: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property into 28 lots ranging in size from 5000 to 6000 square. In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow common wail duplex construction and an Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72' Ave. RECEIVED MAY 2 6 2005 (Ai Y OF Y ;:imre PLANNING DIV. PARCEL NU1YIBERS: 181329-43011, 181332-12003 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you Haight have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held June 8, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e-mail address is jpeters@ciyakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6163. CO NTS: Contact Department / Agency _DOS: INDEX CITY 01 Vn,u>n' REQUEST FOR CANTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAT May 2'1,1095 TO: City ofYmarievelopment Services Team Jerry R ^bee. _ on Codes FROM: Jeff Peters, Assista tt Planner SUBJECT: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM ADJ #8- 05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson PROPOSAL: Long Plat of ahrrn..:.....F..i_. r , •7 _ of .,-. --ng Plat o'- approximately 5.1 : acres �R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property into 28 lots ranging in size from 5000 to 6000 square. In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow common wall duplex construction and an Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NIERS: 181329-43011, 181332-12003 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly. DST meeting to be held June 8, /005 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e-mail address is jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us and the Plfinning Department's fax n»mber is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6163. COMMENT'S: . `73-t_\(\\\. Contact Department / Agency INDEX .. 'ST PACKETS DISTRIBUTION LIST Applicant: rah K eke -1114,, UAZO# i�� �-c5 c. i� co./q..6sDate of Meeting: (, -1 APS Pi5-Os City of Yakima Divisions I Yakima County Planning & Public Works: ec odes Doug Maples Qr Traffic Engineerin Codes Sandy Cox Joan Davenport .•mit'. .jt„I,,� ? 's f;11 L �= 5 Parks & Recreation Denise Nichols Gary Pira v -r 19 Police Dept. Ben Hittle Jerry Robertson 17 Transit astewater/Utilities Max Linden ;Ift F f re Dept. Lanny Bonsen Other Agencies: a44hr iii Nob Hill Water sir' ,t; 21 Refuse Nancy Fortier 23 Yakima Cdunty Planning Steve Erickson Preston Shepherd 6111 Tieton Dr. 98908 '3 WA State Department of Ecology 9.I. ;. Pacific Power & Light C Cascade Natural Gas Co. 29 West Valley School District #208 ri`r Tl,cr ;; County Clean Air Authority 33 Yakima Greenway foundation 35 Yakima County 911 37 Department of Wildlife f , 39 WSDOT(Department of Transportation) 41 Yakama lndiah Nation Gwen Clear Mike Paulson Sheila Ross 15 W. Yakima Ave. Suite 200 98902 500 No. Keys Rd. 98901 701 S. lst Ave. Yakima, WA. 98902 43 Trolleys 45 WSDOT, Aviation Division Peter Ansingh Les Ornelas Al Brown Wayne Wantland Ted Clusing Salah Al-Tamimi [ Bill Beckley h Paul Edmondson �ojl l John Shambaugh 8902 Zier Rd. 98908 6 S. 2nd St. Rm 1016 111 S. 18th St. 98901 YPD 1701 S. 24th Ave, 98902 2809 Rudkin Rd. Union Gap, WA 98903 P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 7:ult, y r 313 N. 3rd St. Yakima, WA 98901 3704 172nd St. NE, Suite K-2 Arlington, WA 98223 DOT INDEX CITY OF YAKIMA REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DEVELOPIkaNT SERVICES TEAM May 23, 2005 TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team FROM: Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT #3-04 & EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05, ADM ADJ #8- 05, Frank Baehm / Pete Olson PROPOSAL: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property into 28 lots ranging in size from 5000 to 6000 square. In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow common wall duplex construction and an Administrative Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72.n Ave. PARCEL ERS: 181329-43011, 181332-12003 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held June 8, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e-mail address is jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6163. COMMENTS: Contact Department / Agency INDEX EXHIBIT # 0-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 D-5 D-6 D-7 D-8 FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER D SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) Review DOCUMENT Environmental Checklist Notice of Application & Public Hearing Mitigated Determination of Nonsignific, Publication 500 -foot radius adjoining property own Agencies notified and Affidavit of Maili Legal Notice of Application, Public Hea Mitigated Determination of Nonsignific, Publication Press Release of Application & Public H Preliminary Mitigated Determination of Notice of Decision — Final Mitigated Det Nonsignificance, 500 -foot radius adjoint and SEPA Agencies notified and Affidai Legal Notice -Notice of Decision — Final Determination of Nonsignificance Press Release - Notice of Decision — Fin Determination of Nonsignificance DATE 4/29/05 and Preliminary Ince and Affidavit of 6/16/05 ;rs and SEPA ig 6/16/05 ing and Preliminary nce, and Affidavit of 6/16/05 earing and Nonsignificance 6/16/05 rmination of ig property owners it of Mailing 7/8/05 Vfitigated 7/8/05 Mitigated 7/8/05 PRESS RELEASE CITY OF YAKIMA SEPA FINAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE July 8, 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. Mitigation: All mitigation, dedication and site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima EngineeDeV Traffic Engineer. INDEX ,# 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat t of HEDGEWOOD )GEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 awn 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69 Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71St Ave. to the proposed end of IEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave, from provided r�.,. approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. There is no comment period for this MDNS ❑ This Fianal MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date July 8, 2005 DOC. INDEX You may appeal this determination to: Doug Maples, Building Codes & Planning Manager, at 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901. No later than: July 25, 2005 By (method) Complete appeal application form and payment of $505 appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the City of Yakima Planning Division to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. 0 There is no agency appeal . LEGAL NOTICE fITYY OFAKJM + i vi• 1 C�1111Y1Li SEPA FINAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGN1EICANCE July 8, 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 18132943011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. Mitigation: All mitigation, dedication and site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer and Traffic Engineer. CCr, INDEX --N- 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 70 Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this_ development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Planmust be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. There is no comment period for this MDNS This Fianal MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date July 8, 2005 DOC. INDEX 0 You may appeal this determination to: D at 129 N 2116 Street, Yakima, WA 98901. No later than: July 25, 2005 By (method) Complete appeal application form and pa You should be prepared to make specific factual objectio Contact the City of Yakima Planning Division to read or appeals. 0 There is no agency appeal . u�,MaIla a,v1[brJi6+s Building Codes & Planning Manager, valent of $505 appeal fee. ns. ask about the procedures for SEPA PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE ONLY ON JULY 8, 2005 Send Invoice and Affidavit Account #11002 City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 of Publication to: 'DOS. INDEX STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SEPA NOTICE Re: Prel Long Plat#3-05, CL(2)#9-05, Adm Adj#8-05 & EC#19-05 Pete Olson for Frank Baehm 1419 S. 72nd Ave. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a SEPA Notice of Decision, Compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith. That said notice was addressed to all public and private agencies and interested parties, all of which are individually listed on the mailing lists retained by the Planning Division. That said notices were mailed by me on the 8th day of July , 2004. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist YMATS Planner YVCOG 6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Doug Mayo Wastewater Treatment Plant Bureau of Indian Affairs PO Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Yakama Tribal Council PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Soil Conserv tion Dist a vu Dist Attn: Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St Suite F Yakima, WA 98902 Eric Barstrand Dept. of Fisheries 1701 So. 24ih Ave. Yakima, Wa 98902 Mr. Scott Nicolar Yakama Indian Nation -Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 Mr. Hiram Olney Yakama Indian Nation P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Bill Beckley Yakama Indian Nation Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Tonpenish, WA 94948 Federal Aviation Administration Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, 8n c WA 90VSJ-4U50 WSDOT Aviation Division John Shambaugh 3704172nd St. N.E. Suite K-12 Arlington, WA 98273 Mr. Marty Miller Office of Farmworker Housing 1400 Summitview #203 Yakima, WA 98902 Donna J. Bunten Critical Areas Coordinator D.O.E., Shorelands & Environ, Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Martin Humphries Yakima Valley Museum_ 2105 Tieton Dr. Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Buck Taylor, Manager Yakima Airport 2400 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 S. 18th St. Yakima, WA 98901 ALWAYS SEND TO APPLICANT 4 t41 tnn b N S �/ ��- 0 DOC, INDEX Army Corps P.O. Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jheila Ross Cascade Natural Gas 701 S. 1" Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Chamber of Commerce 10N9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Kathleen Holscher, City Mgr. City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Ornelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly )ept. of Agriculture .06 Gen. Adm Bldg. Mail Stop AX -41 Olympia, WA 98504 Gwen Clear Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Dept of Emergency Services 4220 E Martin Way Olympia, WA 98504 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1701 Sd. 24th Ave. ,kima, WA 98902 Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W, 4th Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation Planning Engineer 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, WA 98903 Interagency Committee Outdoor Recreation P.O. Box 40917 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 Nob Hill Water Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 N. Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 Dept of Community, Trade & Econ. Dev.- Growth Mgmt P 0 Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 Mr. Greg Griffith Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 WA State Attorney Gen. Office 120 S 3rd St #100 Yakima, WA 98101 Mr. Richard Smith Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 314N2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Blake Davis Q- West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima Co. Commissioners 128 North 211d Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Steven Erickson Yakima Co Planning 128 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Redifer Yakima Co Pub. Services 128 N 2nd St., 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Bailey Yakima Cnty Dev. Serv. Ctr. 128 N. 2°d St. 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Philip Rigdon Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA mpg INDEEXX, WMAS E & STEPHANIE L WARD 515 S 73RD AVE UKIMA, WA 98908 31329-34412 EST VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC 0 BOX 8310 .ION GAP, WA 98903 31329-34404 .KIMA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 000 AHTANUM RD .ION GAP, WA 98903 181332-21432 TODD M ALLAN PO BOX 516 NACRES/ WA 9"0937-- 0516 - 181429-34.4' WES VALL Y P OPERT PO OX 8 10 YAKIA, WA 9890_-8310 181332-12521 YUKIKO MORI 1546 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 V0 labels printed for map sheet ingplt-3-05 1( t o(Saa IrsF, qt.- a 'lir.- 13 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 twD uS Pete Olson P O Box 8021 Yakima, WA. 98908 LC . 7 LA -P74, s l 181.332-21433 TRISHA WILLIANS 1513 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181j29-3441 WES VALLEYPR PERTI LC PO B X 83.0 UNi0k G, WA 98903 Cindy Noble NFRD 5609 W. Arlington Ave Yakima, WA. 98908 DOC. INDEX EIKAL HEINTZ 502 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 -21471 NYB 5 0:4 AMA, 9890: -1918 81332-12460 ATRICK J & JANICE ARENS 604 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43470 ALPH D & JUDITH E GILMAN 0 BOX 272 APLE VALLEY, WA 98038 81332-21480 AYMOND I & SYLVIA P SANCHEZ 504 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21482 ICHARD R & MICHELLE CARMICHAEL sr -ALLEY WEST AVE , WA 98908 31332-12475 CCK W & ALISA J GRAM >22 S 69TH AVE SKIMA, WA 98908 11332-12463 >BERT S & KASANDRA A BAILEY ;09 S 69TH AVE LKIMA, WA 98908 1332-12469 NALD W & GERI L JENNINGS 41 S 69TH AVE 1332-12421 NDRA M & BRIAN D ROBILLARD-TEE 00 W KING ST KIMA, WA 98908 1332-12408 EPHEN & MARIA SOM D9 S 70TH AVE KIMA, WA 98908 181329-43420 MILDRED B PURSLEY 1429 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12013 NOB HILL WATER ASSOC 6111 TIETON DR •YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43468 PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE PO BOX 12 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 181332-21465 RANDY & BROOKLYN TURNER 1504 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12529 RENN D ABRAMS 7101 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43462 RICK & PENNY GEBHARD 7104 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12520 ROBERT & CARLA WEEDIN 1537 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12474 ROGER L & LAURA RIDD 1526 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12411 RUBEN PADILLA 7001 SCOTT COURT 181329-43424 SEAN J & RITA M GASSELING 1432 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 181329-43435 TERRY D & CYNTHIA L WRIGHT 143'7 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18.1329-43413 MONTY L & VIVIAN G CARL 1424 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5510 181332-12513 OLIVIA WEITZ 1538 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1:1329- P'UL P YA 1 69 MAR ARET 12 WA 9 7-0012 181332-12470 RAY A & LINDA L FLEMING 1545 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-12517 181332-12517 RHODA ENSIGN 1525 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 TRUST 181332-12410 RICK C & LIA VANINA FOLKMAN 1505 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12467 ROBERT E & PATRICIA SVLLIVAI; 1538 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21485 ROMAN & ALMA ROMERO 0 RO Z C0 1514 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12424 SAMUEL G & SHANNON L SUTHERI 7002 W KING YAKIMA; 'WA-98�1i1"8 ' -_ 181332-12466 SOMJAI BURTON 1542 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 989&5O6 INDEX. 181332-12478 TERRY P & ELIZABETH R 1529 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 IRWIN i0.L.zG-d1486 JEFFERY BOONE 1600 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908=1965 181332-12512 JOHN A & ELSA J RIGGIN 1542 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12518 JONATHAN L & KAREN R DE VANEY 1529 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21435 JOSEPH N. & KYUNG BENSCH 1509 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12479 KELLEY WIES 1533 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA. 98908 81332-21477 EVIN DEB 510 7 -D ,K `, W 181329-43415 LAWRENCE B & LINDA K SULLIVAN 6921 W LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5512 L81332-21431 LEON D & DELANE R MILLER' L603 VALLEY WEST AVE i'AKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-12522 BORNE J & MARGARET L HOUSE 5821 W KING ST :AKIM ; -WA 9 8 9II 8 81332-21463 !ELVIN HARRIS JR '300 W MEAD AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908-1853 81332-21464 (ICHAEL J & KINDRA J ZITO 502 S 73RD AVE •AKIMA, WA 98908 r 181329-43408 JEFFREY J & LINDA LARKIN HENJUM 1441 S. 69TH AVE YAKTMa WA 98908-5511 1E11332-12464 JOHN W DISTLER 1550 S 69TH AVE ,YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12419 JOSEPH K & BARBARA K HUSTON 7007 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2043 181329-43412 KARL & TERESA ISHIZAKA 1428 S 669TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12509 KELLY D & SHARON LEE MADSON 1522 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12413 KIM & KERRY NEWMAN 7007 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181329-43421 LAWRENCE B & SHAR L FAIN 1433 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21437 LEZLIE A BEALER 1505 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 1813.32-12471 LOWELL KENNETH BISCHOFF 1549 S 69TH AVE • YAM:MA-'WA 38-908- -` - 181329-43405 MICHAEL A & CAROL E LAMBERT 1440'S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-434.16 MICHAEL R & ANNETTE LAFLEUR 6917 W LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5512 181332-12448 JOAN V ARNOLD 1515 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43407 JON E & KELLY J CASEBEER 1437 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12418 JOSEPH M & FRANCES GLENN 7005 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 • 181332-12514 KEITH .0 JtJLI : MEp,DOWCROFT 1534 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12498 KENNETH R & CLEONE L BERRY I 1602 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12515 KIM FILINGERI 1530 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34410 LDS CHURCH OF JEST'S CHRI 50 E NORTH TEMPLE • SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84150 t 1.81332-21438 LISA LLAMAS 1503 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12446 MARION J & JOYCE E BLANK 1601 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, -RA-989-T8------ 181332-21436 WA` 9 8 9-T8•' -- -. -•-- 181332-21436 MICHAEL H & MELISSA N 1507 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-195 6 L INDEX 181332-12425 ROSEI� MICHAEL S (iP 1602 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-200 2 .81329-43414 )OUGLAS C & "LINDA M STOLZ .420 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 8 -43422 C & MARY ANN SCHRANK .440 S 68TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 .81332-12445 ;VA M ET AL LUST 603 S 70TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908-2003 81332-12003 'RANK BAEHM ,419 S 72ND AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908-1958 81332-12468 'RED JR & BARBARA•LIEBERT 537 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21439 CAROLYN L BELLES 5' !LLEYWEST AVE 1V1 , WA 98908-1956 81329-43472 ARY L & CINDY L FISHER 515 MEADOW LN AKIMA, WA 98908 81332 5.19 EGO z & JUL N 01 MEADoW L•, CT MA, WA ':''08-369 R r tl OEB'EL B1329.43436 RVING D & NANCY D BENSON 441 S 68TH 9KIMA, WA ,AVE8908 31332-12409 .MES K & MARI R MC KELLAR 507 S 70TH AVE UKIMA, WA 98908 31332-21474 NES R. & MARILYN LANE .9 CONESTOGA BLVD ,KIMA, WA 98908-2420 181329-43014 DOUGLAS H LEMON 1317 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1917 181332-12516 EDWARD B & CHRISTINE L MILES 1526 S 68TH AVE .YAKIMA, WA 98908 r 181329-43417 FRANCIS D & DARLENE A SMITH 6833 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1 F 1 YA- MA, WA 98908-1958 1329 011 N S 72 . E 181332-12458 GAGOUSH JAMES & TAMYRA 1600 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5507 t 181329-43432 GERALD L & NORMA L 1425 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908• 181332-21478 HELEN H WENDT 712 GHORMLEY RD YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332-214 J ES G 7'09 LO YA'-I HILL DE SE A H N PL WA 9890 181329-43467 JAMES 0 & JEANNE LOWELL 11303 NE 60TH ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 181332-12423 JASON R & LAURA D SCHILLING 7004 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21475 DOUGLAS P & NANCY J GROENIG 1505 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12447 EDWARD G OLSON 1507 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332 - RANK T Po Bs. 163 E E � WA 07 {iiY MARA G*DINA 21-0 63 181329-43418 FRANKLIN I & BECKY E SCOTT 1421 S 69TH AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181329-43434 GARY F & LORENE L M PERO 1433 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 32;-4346 7- �.c.OW YAKIMA, WA 9 ISHE 8 18133-2-12004 GERALDINE SALI 1505 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12473 HOWARD & BEVERLY DARROW 1530 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43411 JAMES K & DIANE L THOMAS 1432 S 69TH AVE 'YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43465 JAMES R & SUSAN RI CBMCDND 7102 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908L. ,I IND Y.. 181332-12462 JAY M & JACKIE C WEES 1606 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 (to ALEJO & VERONICA NARANJO JR °1425 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 iu�a�S-43406 BEATRICE M SCOTT 1436 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12511 BRADFORD J & SUSAN L MC MILLAN 6831 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12510 BRIAN J & JILL M DAVISON 1521 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA. WA 98908-5600 181329-43433 BRYAN E & TYRAN E H MAINS 1429 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12412 CHARLES W & MICHELLE J CARLSON 7003 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12416 CHRISTOPHER LEONARD 1508 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43425 CRAIG M & CHRISTINA WARNER 1428 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908. 1.81332-21466 DAVID •& GALE J AVILA 1506 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43463 DEAN & ELMA THOMPSON 7106 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908-5729 181332-12415 DON E JONES 7004 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-12472 ANDREW R & DONNA M BLACK 1534 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12528 BESSIE V SICKENS 1517 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12476 BRADLEY E & TERRI A TRISLER 1521 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-21481 BRIAN 5 & VERONICA L MAZIE 1506 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21476 C CARL & DONNA MAZIE 1503 S 73RD AVE- YAKIMA. WA QAcInQ 181332-12426 CHERYL A WALKER 1606 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21473 CLARENCE 0 ZELLNER 1509 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34007 DALE B & RHEA MURPHY 1308 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1916 181332-21472 DAVID A & VIRGINIA R SHUEL 8210 OCCIDENTAL AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98903 181332-21484 DENNIS BRIAN JONES 1512 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1955 181329-43428 DONALD & SHERRY DONOVAN 6831 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12414 BARRY J ETUX ROSS 7006 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181339-21434 BILLY J & SUSAN L TERRY 1511 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12422 BRENDA E UNDERWOOD 7006 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2042 7' 18.1332-12465 BRYAN C & LISA MARTIN 1546 8 69TH AVE I YAKIMA, IATA 98908 181329-43423 CHAN I & YONG S CHONG 1436 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12417 CHRISTINE L WILSON 7003 KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12459 CRAIG J & SHERRY DAVENPOR' 1601 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12012 DANIEL N & SHARON C JOHNS 1603 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA? WA 98908-1962 181332-12477 DAVID C & SAUNDRA L ALLEN 1525 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43426 DENNIS M & JERRIAITNE SILL PO BOX 11106 YAKIMA, WA 9890,x. 181329-43427 DOU S & HYUNG S LE E 1420 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager • www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTICE OF DECISION Compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) July 8, 2005 On June 16, 2005 the City of Yakima, Washington issued a Notice of Application Environmental Review and Preliminary SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance regarding an Environmental Checklist application submitted by Pete Olson on behalf of Frank Baehm. This review concerns the environmental analysis of the Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes located at 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Parcel Numbers: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 City File Number: EC# 19-05 Following the required 20 -day public comment period, and consideration of all comments received, the City of Yakima has issued .the enclosed SEPA Threshold Decision. This decision may be appealed within 15 days from the date of mailing- Appeals must be in writing and on forms available from the City of Yakima Planning Division, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. The fee of $505.00 must accompany the Appeal Application. For further information or assistance, you may wish to contact Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509)575-6163 at the City Planning Division. Doug Maples �f 1 A--- c2— Planning & C.fe Admmistration Manager' Notice of Decision Mailing Date: July 8, 2005 Enclosures: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Mailing Map Doc. INDEX Yakima II��o 1994 x.11 Y 01 YA191 A SEPA F I AL : A I I.GA ED DETERM11 ATION O NONSIGNIFICANCE July 8'2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. �_ PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehrn. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72IId Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima; Washington. -kms: +NTJMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. DOC. INDEX # -(P 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on alI streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eit-inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69 Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. There is no comment period for this MDNS ❑ This Fianal MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 DOC. - INDEX Address: �� -2nd r.. Address: 12914 Street, Yakima, WA 989011 Date July 8, 2005 Signature 71 a You may appeal this determination to: Doug Maples, Building Codes & Planning Manager, at 129 N 2n Street, Yakima, WA 98901. No later than: July 25, 2005 Tiv (r„et1- r\ l Complete appeal application form and payment of $505 appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the City of Yakima Planning Division to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. 0 There is no agency appeal . INDEX 4 PRESS RELEASE Notice of Application & Public Hearing: The City of Yakima has received an application for the following project that may be of interest to you. You are invited to comment on this proposal. Date of permit application: April 29, 2005 Date of determination of completeness: April 26, 2005 Date of notice of application: June 16, 2005 Comment due date: July 6, 2005 Project Description: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet, coupled with an environmental review. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. Project Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Project Applicant: Pete Olson for Frank Baehm. P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Environmental Review: The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and preliminarily issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) for this project. A copy of the final threshold determination may be obtained on request and may be appealed pursuant to YMC 6.88.170. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: Street extension for fire safety and public infrastructure such as curb, gutter sidewalks and signalization for safe passage for children to school. Required Permits — The following local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project: Building Permit, Street Break Permit, Clean Air Permit, Traffic Concurrency Review. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163. DOC - INDEX REQUEST TOR ixTpi TTEN You do have the right to comment on this application and become a patty of record. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on this proposed project and its probable environmental impacts• All written comments received by 5:00 July will pm 6, 2005 vrlu be considered final determination this ,• ---------- prior to issuing the 111141 uc�cluiuiauvit on application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, City of Yakima, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be to the sure reference the rile number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This long plat request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for August 11, 2005, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e- mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. NOTICE OF DECISION A copy of the final SEPA determination will be mailed to you after the end of the 20 -day comment period. DOC.. )NDE) PRESS RELEASE CITY OF YAKIMA PRELIMINARY SEPA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE June 16 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LO CATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. DOC. INDEX Mitlleatio3?o All mitigation, dedication and ioaten, site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction t: Vn o;a the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer and Traffic Engineer. 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall aclfYiinnalA y install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yana Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvement his or i improvements Y V3ii'vi1Ls at or her expense. L 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. ❑ There is no comment period for this TN J ❑ This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. ® This Preliminary MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. All comments must be submitted by: 5:00 pm July 6, 2005. Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date June 16, 2005 _DOC, INDEX OF WASHINGTON,) AFFIDAVIT OF PubLttATION BUSCH; being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that is the Accountant of Yakima Herald -Republic, Inc., ly newspaper. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper approved Sze Superior Court of the State of Washington for Yakima under an order made and entered on the 13th day of February, and it is now and has been for more than six months prior he date of publication hereinafter referred to, published he English language continually as a daily newpaper in _, Yakima County, Washington. Said newspaper is now and has {'during all of said time printed in an office maintained e aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. t the annexed is a true copy of a: L NOTICE CITY OF YAKIMA P, YM as published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) aid newspaper once each DAY and for period of 1 r.) to -wit; on a r--�,... .... ... the 16th day of JUNE, 2005 e such newspaper was regularly distribu*ed to its subscribers g all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged he foregoing publication is the sum of $276.30 Accountant IBED AND SWORN to before this 16th day June, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yakima. DOC. INDEX LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF YAKIMA PRELIMINARY SEPA NIITIGATED DETERNIINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE June 16 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 7211d Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. Mitigation: All mi_ti¢ation ao,a;,,,,t;on and site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction an the proposed property conform t the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer` and T affzc Engineer. 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received. April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of FTPDGEWOOD as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor for � a aiwi Suali aiiditlfit5ai,y 1nSdaii an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 7211d Ave. and in S. 71St Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense, ��� 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. O There is no comment period for this MDNS r O This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. ® This Preliminary MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold comments must be submitted by: 5:00 pm July 6, 2005. agency will not act determination. All DOC. INDEX 4 Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date June 16, 2005 PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE ONLY ON THURSDAY, JUNE 16, 2005 Send Invoice and Affidavit of Publication to: Account #11002 City of Yakima, Planning Division 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, Wa 98901 'DOC. INDEX STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF RiMA!UNG Re: Prel Long Plat#3-05, CL(2)#9-05, ADIV1 A HDv#t3-iii & bCr#1 9-U5 Pete Olson for Frank Baehm 1419 S. 72nd Ave. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application Environmental Review and Public Hearing before the Yakima City Hearing Examiner, a true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the applicant and all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property and SEPA Agencies. That said property owners and agencies are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 16th day of June. 43005. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. (14.4t&r‘i Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist -DCC. INDEX # `�-3 Transportation Planner YVCOG 6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Doug Mayo Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Coordinator Bureau of Indian Affairs PO Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Yakama Tribal Council PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Soil Conservation Dist Attn: Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St Suite F Yakima, WA 98902 Barstrand Dept. of Fisheries 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, Wa 98902 Mr. Scott Nicolai Yakama Indian Nation -Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 Mr. Bill Beckley Yakama Indian Nation Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Federal Aviation Administration Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055-4056 WSDOT Aviation Division John Shambaugh 3704 172°' St. N.E. Suite K-12 Arlington, WA 98223 Mr. Marty Miller Office of Farmworker Housing 1400 Summitview #203 Yakima, WA 98902 Donna J. Bunten Critical Areas Coordinator D.O.E., Shorelands & Environ. Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Martin Humphries Yakima Valley Museum 2105 Tieton Dr. Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Buck Taylor, Manager Yakima Airport 2400 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 S. 18t St. Yakima, WA 98901 ALWAYS SEND TO APPLICANT to/R1 4' /WC 7 �,Js Army Corps P.O. Box r'-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Sheila Ross Cascade Natural Gas 701 S. i Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Chamber of Commerce 10N9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Kathleen Holscher, City Mgr. City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Omelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly Dept, of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adm Ridg_ Mail Stop AX -41 Olympia, WA 98504 Gwen Clear Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section PO BOX 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WA State Emergency Mgmt. Div. Mitigation, Analysis & Planning Supervisor Building 20 Camp Murray, WA 98430-5122 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 ) Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Mr. Paul Donahue Dept of Soc/Health Service Capital Prngrarns ()fn Bldg# e 2, MS OB -23B Olympia, WA 98504 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W. 4th Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation Planning Engineer 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, WA 98903 Nob ilTiiiiWater Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 N. Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 Dept. of Cl'ED Growth Management Services P.O. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 ) Mr. Greg Griffith Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 nlvmoia WA ()RSnn WA State Attorney Gen. Office 120 S 3rd St #100 Yakima, WA 98101 Mr. Richard Smith Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 314 N 2nd St Yakima; WA 98901 Blake Davis Q- West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima Co, Commissioners 128 North 2" Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Steven Erickson Yakima Co Planning 128 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Rectifer Yakima Co Pub. Services 128 N 2nd St., 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Bailey Yakima Cnty Dev. Serv. Ctr. 128 N. 2"1 St. 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Caroll Palmer Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA $ •9;48 INDEX. 181332-21470 THOMAS E & STEPHANIE L WARD 1515 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1� 9-34412 NEST VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 8310 INION GAP, WA 98903 L81329-34404. !AKIMA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT .000 AHTANUM RD INION GAP, WA 98903 40 labels printed for map _alstA)-NFR� • Pete Olson P 0 Box 8021 Yakima, WA. 98908 )31332-21432 TODD M ALLAN PO BOX 516 NACHES, WA 98937-0516 18 WE PO YA 329-34 T VAL BOX IM Y 'ROPERTI 310 , WA 989.: :310 181332-12521 YUKIKO MORI 1546 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 sheet ingplt-3-05 1 gQ(2.41, 1 )181332-21433 TRISHA WILLIAMS 1513 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 81329-3 41 EST VLEY PROPERTI 0 BO 8310 GAP, ':903 Cv;_ . rte._ Cindy Noble NFRD 5609 W. Arlington Ave Yakima, WA. 98908 M • 044 App , s(�r4± ///%G - Doc LLC 181329-43419 ALEJO & VERONICA NARANJO JR 1425 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43406 BEATRICE M SCOTT 1436 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12511 BRADFORD J & SUSAN L MC MILLAN 6831 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12510 BRIAN J & JILL M DAVISON 1521 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5600 181329-43433 BRYAN E & TYRAN E H MAINS 1429 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 9€ 908 181332-12412 CHARLES W & MICHELLE J CARLSON 7003 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12416 CHRISTOPHER LEONARD 1508 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43425 CRAIG M & CHRISTINA WARNER 1428 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21466 DAVID & GALE J AVILA L506 S 73RD AVE i'AKIMA, WA 98908 L81329-43463 DEAN & ELMA THOMPSON 7106 GREGORY PL CAKIMA, WA 98908-5729 .81332-12415 )ON E JONES /004 SCOTT CT .AKIMA, WA 98908-2045 1;81332-12472 )TDREW R & DONNA M BLACK 1534 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA. 98908 181332-12523 BESSIE V PICKENS 1517 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12476 BRADLEY E & TERRI A TRISLER 1521 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-21481 BRIAN S & VERONICA L MAZIE 1506 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21476 C CARL & DONNA MAZIE 1503 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12426 CHERYL A WALKER 1606 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21473 CLARENCE 0 ZELLNER 1509 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34007 DALE B & RHEA MURPHY 1308 S 72ND AVE I YAKIMA, WA 98908-1976 181332-21472 DAVID A & VIRGINIA R SHUEL 8210 OCCIDENTAL AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98903 181332-21484 DENNIS BRIAN JONES 1512 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1955 181329-43428 DONALD & SHERRY DONOVAN 6831 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 .181332-12414 }3ARRY J ETUX ROSS 7006 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21434 BILLY J & SUSAN L TERRY 1511 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA yzsyvu 181332-12422 BRENDA E UNDERWOOD 7006 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2042, 18.1332-12465 BRYAN C & LISA MARTIN 1546 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43423 CHAN I & YONG S CHONG 1436 5 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12417 CHRISTINE L WILSON 7003 KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12459 CRAIG J & SHERRY DAVENPORT 1601 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12012 DANIEL N & SHARON C JOHNSON 1603 S 72ND AVE I YAKIMA, WA 98908-1.962 181332-12477 DAVID C & SAUNDRA L ALLEN TR 1525 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43426 DENNIS M & JERRIANNE PO BOX 11106 YAKIMA, WA 9y E7 `9 s INDEX 181329-43427 DOU S & HYUNG S LEE 1420 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 SILLERY 181329-43414 DOUGLAS C & LINDA M STOLZ 1420 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1, 9-43422 DWA1N C & MARY ANN SCHRANK 1440 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12445 EVA M ET AL LUST 1603 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2003 181332-12003 FRANK BAEHM 1419 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA,. WA 98908-1958 181332-12468 FRED JR & BARBARA LIEBERT 1537 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21439 GAP & CAROLYN L BELLES 15 ULLEY WEST AVE YAt. •, WA 98908-1956 181329-43472 ARY L & CINDY L FISHER 7515 MEADOW LN (AKIMA, WA 98908 .81332-12519 HZEGORY J & JULI N KNOEBEL ;501 MEADOW LANE CT 'AKIMA, WA 98908-3692 81329-43436 RVING D & NANCY D BENSON 441 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12409 AMES K & MARI R MC KELLAR 507 S 70TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21474 AMES R. & MARILYN LANE 19 CONESTOGA BLVD kKIMA, WA 98908-2420 1329-43014 .)OUGLAS H LEMON 1317 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1917 181332-12516 EDWARD B & CHRISTINE L MILES 1526 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43417 FRANCIS D & DARLENE A SMITH 6833 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1329 NK 19 KI 181332-12458 GAGOUSH JAMES & TAMYRA 1600 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5507 181329-43471 GARY L & CINDY FISHER 6902 WILLOW PLACE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43432 GERALD L & NORMA L HILL 1425 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21478 HELEN H WENDT 712 GHORMLEY RD YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21483 JAMES G & DENISE A HELMS 7709 LOREN PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43467 JAMES 0 & JEANNE LOWELL 11303 NE 60TH ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 181332-12423 JASON R & LAURA D SCHILLING 7004 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 )81332-21475 DOUGLAS P & NANCY J GROENIG 1505 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12447 EDWARD G OLSON 1507 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12407 FRANK & TAMARA GODINA PO BOX 163 BUENA, WA 98921-0163 181329-43418 FRANKLIN I & BECKY E SCOTT 1421 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181329-43434 GARY F & LORENE L M PERO 1433 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 81329- 466 ARY & CINDY 51 MEA..W Lk IMA, W• ':908 181332-12004 GERALDINE SALI 1505 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 IS ER 181332-12473 HOWARD & BEVERLY DARROW 1530 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43411 JAMES K & DIANE L THOMAS 1432 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43465 JAMES R & SUSAN RICH1v OND 7102 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98902A. INDEX 181332-12462 JAY M & JACKIE C WEES E 1606 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-21486 IEFFERY BOONE .600 VALLEY WEST AVE rAKIMA, WA 98908-1965 81332-1212 OHN A & ELSA J RIGGIN 542 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12518 ONATHAN L & KAREN R DE VANEY 529 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21435 OSEPH N. & KYUNG BENSCH 509 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 91332-12479 ELLEY WIES 633 •S 69TH AVE 4KIMA, WA 98908 §1332-21477 VIN J & DEBRA CRAWFORD ;10 S 73RD AVE 1KIMA, WA 98908 1329-43415 .WRENCE B & LINDA K SULLIVAN 21 W LOGAN AVE .KIMA, WA 98908-5512 1332-21431 ON D & DELANE R MILLER 03 VALLEY WEST AVE KIMA, WA 98908 1332-12522 RNE J & MARGARET L HOUSE 21 W KING ST om t, WA 9'89'08' .332-21463 JVIN HARRIS JR )0 W MEAD AVE LIMA, WA 98908-1853 332-21464 'HAEL J & KINDRA J ZITO 2 S 73RD AVE :IMA, WA 98908 -1 1. $1329-43408 JEFFREY J & LINDA LARKIN HENJUM 1441 5 9TH 6 v.,in AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12464 JOHN W DISTLER 1550 S 69TH AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12419 JOSEPH K & BARBARA K HUSTON 7007 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2043 181329-43412 KARL & TERESA ISHIZAKA 1428 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12509 KELLY D & SHARON LEE MADSnN 1522 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12413 KIM & KERRY NEWMAN 7007 SCOTT CT YAKTMA, WA 98908-2045 181329-43421 LAWRENCE B & SHAR L FAIN 1433 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21437 LEZLIE A BEALER 1 1505 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 181332-12471 LOWELL KENNETH BISCHOFF 1549 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA;-WA 98908' -" . 181329-43405 MICHAEL A & CAROL E LAMBERT 1440 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43416 MICHAEL R & ANNETTE LAFL_EUR 6917 W LOGAN AVE YA_KIMA, WA 98908-5512 1 81332-12448 JOAN V ARNOLD 1515 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43407 JON E & KELLY J CASEBEER 1437 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA U tt 181332-12418 JOSEPH M & FRANCES GLENN 7005 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332_12514 KEITH & JULIE MEADOWCROFT 1534 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12498 KENNETH R & CLEONE L DERRY RE' 1602 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12515 KIM FILINGERI 1530 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34410 LDS CHURCH OF JESUS CHRI 50 E NORTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84150 t -• 181332-21438 LISA LLAMAS 1503 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12446 MARION J & JOYCE E BLFF .NK 1601 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21436 MICHAEL H & MELISSA N 1507 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 Xll4'56 la, 181332-12425 MICHAEL S KENNEDY 1602 S 70TH AVE YAKTMA. WA gRgoR-7cn? INDEX ROP-7"NICR2 181332-21479 MIKAL HEINTZ 1502 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 lb_ J2-21471 NANCY A NYBERG 1513 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1918 181332-12460 PATRICK J & JANICE ARENS 1604 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43470 RALPH D & JUDITH E GILMAN PO BOX 272 MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 181332-21480 RAYMOND I & SYLVIA P SANCHEZ 1504 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181'12-21482 RI D R & MICHELLE CARMICHAEL 15 ALLEY WEST AVE YAK.LotA, WA 98908 181332-12475 RICK W & ALISA J ORAM 1522 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12463 ROBERT S & KASANDRA A BAILEY 1609 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-12469 20NALD W & GERI L JENNINGS L541 S 69TH AVE c'AKIMA; TLA— V 9OS_._.-_ L81332-12421 SANDRA M & BRIAN D ROBILLARD-TEE 7100 W KING ST •'AK'r- - WA 98908 81332-12408 TEPHEN & MARIA SOM ,509 S 70TH AVE •AKIMA, WA 98908 1329-43420 MMMILDRED B PURSLEY 1429 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12013 NOB HILL WATER ASSOC 6111 TIETON DR YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43468 PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE PO BOX 12 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 181332-21465 RANDY & BROOKLYN TURNER 1504 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12529 RENN D ABRAMS 7101 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43462 RICK & PENNY GEBHARD 7104 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12520 ROBERT & CARLA WEEDIN 1537 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12474 ROGER L & LAURA RIDD 1526 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12411 RUBEN PADILLA 7001 SCOTT COURT YAKIMA; - -w -989U•8 -- 181329-43424 -- 181329-43424 SEAN J & RITA M GASSELING 1432 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 181329-43435 TERRY D & CYNTHIA L WRIGHT 1437 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 -r P.81329-43413 ONTY L & VIVIAN G CARL 1424 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5510 181332-12513 OLIVIA WEITZ 1538 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1:1329-43 P +UL & RG P• BOX 2 YAK , WA 9 RET H EN •UST] -0012 1'81332-12470 RAY A & LINDA L FLEMING 1545 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-12517 RHODA ENSIGN 1525 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12410 RICK C & LIA VANINA FOLKMAN 1505 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12467 ROBERT E & PATRICIA SULLIVAN 1538 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21485 ROMAN & ALMA ROMERO OROZCO 1514 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12424 SAMUEL G & SHANNON L SUTHERL 7002 W KING YAKIMA; 1 9W9-08 '—" 181332-12466 SOMJAI BURTON 1542 S 69TH AVEt“- YAKIMA, WA 989081-150E5 INDE, -3 181332-12478 TERRY P & ELIZABETH R IRWIN 1529 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 -.. ..<... tr\' t •'lry 01.00'of'A plic n $&Ptib :':,s' w, d1c H.ei3 w0. ro (:. Y'.4ktrrna,l�ae.reeccv c, w ca 'tdg F ct float may & df i[tteres¢t}1•yo (ioiii6 *4,.,3;14 gaup .011 `•Daie..oi.detatiliii "- pch?9'g00,':t Int®ries`s:• Aq 9a�e ot'�tfc�"•�? appiica'ti�:',.•9ufri .. Cbrrrrrie[it due date-� 2OO :a' s4 =du1,a�60� rte, � <� ;ins, • - „s :;. 1M1 r '_- • euro � e scriopa STATE OF WASHINGTON) .j OF YAKIJYJA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , BLTSCFi; .F; x°P'.wrlti3::fBl; being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that Xii'ari.ufi t'.e is the pcc ..- ___ P �+unLailt of Yakima Herald -Republic, Inc., •'`'.1y newspaper. Said newspaper is a legal news a er a the Superior Court of the p P pproved '¢ he State of Washington for Yakima - y under an order made and entered on the 13th day of February, and it is now and has been for more than six months prior s ��re,he date of publication hereinafter referred to, published he English language continually as a daily newpaper in 'ftaa, Yakima County, Washington. Said newspaper is now and has during all of said time printed in an office maintained ze aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. r:::�:r.::r t.:4 ""+"sn:• ,t the annexed triyiFo' g � .... • s R..: .;•.. �:.e'-.': ';:: �`•�.: �.:L , a xed he ro`s ol:sforDta6a teaer<Oiitiir d9rhaNi ANOTICEsaefrj�i pe _. -.' tin iiiiieihilgpillea fifee a ° ` .eikiYe 13- CO �eend' rapublishedi 8, li..laid newspaper ) to -wit; on is a true copy of a: Notice of Applic, in regular issues (and not in supplement form) once each DAY and .for a period of 1 eiaK. f%ial*OOL(60# 04114 i 1?'- �•f �;�a� ,40-04.4.**fro 38r a �i�i �E; a:i�!�s���ty. }�F6i� m oat Heid p® e Ns h. ,,1 gat - ?i* 'relitP)"r 9n§S•.1f. 8ft .4 o:11 =Mr or�;jf f -J C`w.?.w<+sCWtri.'l,.t A GetR ,:?kith '�¢Vf4.0 �r n. t � P��osak•.;pi� sisi .> A :• :r" ='tk: fes?' i4 iw`4_C?ai..'�,s FO T �� `' ' " %<rt 12i'g m�.see�vi- FaOFf';IEaIi-"r'e��''ti:'•" s"{i!---. ,. �.'Erciv •.<•-corrrr[reri�pr#�q{,is�'"lira 'er'iL�oi#rage ut ,. Vj'e� i 'z; r�t 'f _.0.44:6 ase afd'-its" Prafibto !i it It xaiNaitiA q, IFS mtnentstir BNekio.M.'..1.440or�'takIy.6;'.2O9rw Il=be`A to:'iee(7iM' seen '. vtj l-daten,aja�i�1t,R�attiis._ ii4 :he such newspaper was regularly distributed to itssubscribers -ati3ilial . +' a , cprtir110 ;oit: #Li'l ikciect i a R s ���°`��{�:.12�':ts:2nct�s#�e�i'.i� � `� "g tg all of ubscrL s Rt� 01.4 a S •wo. 3_'.-: grt1•,'`fib'' said aPP S*e�:24ct..540. cre d�:heperiod. That the full amount of the fee charged .tiyoiiFc•®rdLnrt :,�, 4:.: foregoing publication is the s of 22 y.� , l .•.. =�t .: $ 1.04 the 16th day of JUNE, 2005 itt r. aqt� Tiei # c i o g ? d:'st:iAkit4V# ggd`.s'y ?aY"GiaQni LS tea trei b}cartFiS Stree Grp as ti^flPe onfatelFl9sf !e!; ?m e e: .1,410.010. -;* 1 aSti^ bli$'yy.'i'.� f.P4Catioi:•isg_faJlar= f^• f.. , +YL . _�i' o�, aka 1$01§0414 -it e iF k tiiayetTfq you T Zodi _ O 14j 10A00'5" '•r•t..a t'::....,: n j/ a•' Pvayo-��� Accountant SWORN to before his 16th day .j June, 2005 ...14V -�� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yakima. DOC. INDEX -- 1 DEPARTMENT OF) COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELbPMENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager • www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 Notice of Application & Public Hearing: The City of Yakima has received an application for the following project that may be of interest to you. You are invited to comment on this proposal. Date of permit application: April 29, 2005 Date of determination of completeness: April 26, 2005 Date of notice of application: June 16, 2005 Comment due date: July 6, 2005 Project Description: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet, coupled with an environmental review. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. Project Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Project Applicant: Pete Olson for Frank Baehm. P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Environmental Review: The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and preliminarily issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) for this project. A copy of the final threshold determination may be obtained on request and may be appealed pursuant to YMC 6.88.170. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: Street extension for fire safety and public infrastructure such as curb, gutter sidewalks and signalization for safe passage for children to school. Required Permits — The following Local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project: Building Permit, Street Break Permit, Clean Air Permit, Traffic Concurrency Review. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: SEPAJGMA Integrated Environmental Summary DOD_ Yakima INDEX ij1J8 1994 Preliminary determination of the development reguiatlons that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please ca..Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163. BEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS You do have the right to comment on this application and become a party of record. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on this proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. All written comments received by 5:00 pm July 6, 2005 will be considered prior to issuing the final determination on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, City of Yakima, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence, NOTICE OF PUBLIC IM APE- This long plat request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for August 11, 2005, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yaidma, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e- mail at jpeters@ci.yakirna.wa.us. < .,u.:rn _ ^-JY...viu� Vl.�nnllllq.yya.tiS. NOTICE OF DECISION A copy of the final SEPA determination will be mailed to you after the end of the 20 -day comment period. Encl: Vicinity Map, Mailing Map, Site Plan, Checklist, and Preliminary Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. DOC.: INDEX CITY OF YAKIMA PRELIMINARY SEPA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE June 16 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson f Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 7?' Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measureslisted below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance g� (MONS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalilation. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. Mitigation: All mitigation, dedication and site improvements required of the developer shall 1e installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01— 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer traffic Engineer. INDEX Z 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: The nr�hh......a ..L..11 dedicate ]• appiic�� shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or hisfher contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69 Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 714 Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in acenrrdance with Chapter of the Yakima —---.�...-....... ..swa Chapter 12.03 Y tlK.iIYi Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fray feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2, Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. ❑ There is no comment period for this MDNS 0 This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. © This Preliminary MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold comments must be submitted by; 5:00 pm July 6, 2005. agency will not act determination,_ M1 JUL INDEX y o� Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2" Street, Yakim. WA 98901 Date June 16, 2005 Signature AIL._ DOC. INDE)( RTATE .n N v a O.NMEN I AL POLICY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File 1 e No. Date: April,26, 2005 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Pete Olson Phone Number: (509) 945 2114 Address of Proponent: P.O. Box 8021, Yakima, WA 98908 RECEIVED APR e 2 9 20U CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV, 2 Person Completing Form: Bill Hordan Phone Number: (509) 249-1919 Address: 410 North 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Yakima 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: The Plat of Hedgewood 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) The project is proposed to commence in the Summer -Fall of 2005 7. Doou have any y plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Class 3 Review and SEPA Checklist have been prepared and submitted to the City of Yakima for Lot 5 of this plat. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approva 7 s of other proposals directly affectin the covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. g property None known. -DOG. INDEX -1- 10. List any governmen tat approvals for your proposal, if known. Preliminary plat approval Class 2 Review Administrative Adjustment Utility Connection permits Road approach permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, - including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. or permits that will be needed The proposal As proposed, residence on construction construction is to subdivide approximately 6 acres into 28 lots. the development includes the moving of the existing the property to a new lot created in the plat, the of 12 Common Wall Units (24 total units) and the of 2 duplexes (4 units) . 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed .project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The address of the property is 1419 South 72nd Avenue, Y-akima, WA 98908. 13. Taxation Parcel No.(s): 181329-43011 & 181332-12003. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH General description of the site (circle one) :� rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?. 0-1 percent. -2- INDEX C • What general types of soils , ,� _ soi�s are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, �_ ? , r i �•.•-•••�., muck)? 11 you know .the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to o the Soil Survey of Yakima County Area Washington the soils found on-site are: Esquatzel silt loam, 0-2 percent slopes Umpine silt loam, drained, 0_2_percent slopes Both are classified as prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling in anticipated as part of this project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, con- struction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some minor erosion could occur during the construction phases of the roadway and residence g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building) ? Approximately 35 to 45 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fencing will be used as needed to control erosion. INDEX DOC. INDEX - 3 - 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is, - completed? If any, generally describe andgive approximate quantities if known. During construction, some minor blowing dust should be expected. It will be controlled by sprinklers and a water truck. After construction, minor automobile exhaust should be expected in conjunction with residential living. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. ' No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: See 2a. above. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Wide Hollow north of the prop 2._ Will the adjacent waters? available Creek lies approximately 800 to 1,000 feet oral. No. project require any work over, in, or to (within 200 feet) of the described If yes, please describe and attach plans. -4- DOC INDE?- J amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in nr removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill matev.� -.9 auu i.ci J.Ql . --- Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. . Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so,'note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general descri ption, purpose, and aiprnx�mate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals. . ; agricultural, etc.) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve, Not applicable, project to be connected to municipal water and sewer facilities. -5- DOS , !NOD c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . Where will the water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will be contained within the street grid via drainage trenches designed by a professional engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Could waste materials enter ground ,or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See 3c1. above 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: XX_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other XX_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other XX shrubs XX_grass XX_pasture crop or grain wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or al tered? Eventually, all existing vegetation found on the site will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. -6- DOC. INDEX d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhanrP vegetation _ the _ if any: �.. .v��,�, t/11 C11C site, Upon comm At ; r,,, of the rl a ion the residences, residential landscaping consisting of trees, shrubs and grasses will be planted.. 5. ANIMALS Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Bird: hawk, heron, eagle, Mammals: deer, bear, elk, Fish: bass, salmon, trout, songbird, other:�41� beaver, other: herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. Is this site part explain. No. Vf a migration rr177te? If s LJ d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, -if ahy. None proposed. 6. ,ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, g, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for heating and cooling purposes r b. No. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. -7- DOC. INDEX l c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts•, if any: New residences will be constructed to State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. I. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. b. Noise 1._What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? No known noise exists in the area which may affect this project. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) ? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term. -- general construction noise associated with the construction of residential development. Long-term -- general noises associated with residential living. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Compliance with the City Noise Ordinance. 'DOG. INDEX -8- 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is used a single-family residence and pasture for livestock. To the west is South 72nd Avenue, a church and single-family residences. To the south and east are single-family residences. To the north ; s multi -family residential development. - `y` y� b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, the property has historically been used as pasture. c. Describe any structures onthe site. The site contains a single-family residence and miscellaneous outbuildings. d. Will any structures be demolished? - - ---�� If so, what? Yes, the miscellaneous '� l miscelaneous outbuildings will be demolished, the existing residence is proposed to be moved then remain on the - southerly and property. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single-family Residential (R-1). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Low A., density residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of site? the te? the Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? No. i- Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 75 persons would reside in the completed project. iDO IN EX -9- j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people will be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle- or low-income housing. A total of 28 new units will be provided, they will be middle-income units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. None will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing -impacts, if any: None proposed. ,10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed struc- ture(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed? The tallest height of any proposed structure will be approximately 24 feet in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No known views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed. DOC INDEX -10- 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. what type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Normal residential security lighting should be expected. It will occur at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project safety t'y �� c� be a hazard or interfere with Views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No known off-site light or glare exists. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The West Valley Neighborhood park West Valley _ High and High School are located approximately 1/4 oto «1 i2Y mileJuntoo the west of the project. Designated and informal recreational activities are known to occur at those sites. b. . Would the proposed' project displace any ex ot;, recreational uses? "" `11yy If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to Fac provided by the e project or applicant, if any: None proposed. .13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any -places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers Known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. -11- DOC, INDEX b. Generally historic, importance None known. describe any landmarks or evidence of archaeological, scientific, or cultural known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, - and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. -The site is served by South 72nd Avenue on the west and West Mead Avenue on the east. It is proposed that West Mead .Avenue be extended from its current terminus, westward, and intersect with South 72nd Avenue. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have approximately 2 parking spaces per residence for a total of 58 parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . Yes, West Mead will, be extended as described above, it will be public. Additionally, the developer is working jointly with the City toconstruct the intersection of West Mead Avenue and South 72nd Avenue so it can accommodate an appropriately sized intersection, complete with intersection sighalization (it will be public). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,- or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. -12- INDEX f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ° indicate YYlll.il �J�G(JL Approximately 290 vehicle trips per day will be generated by the completed project. Peak times will be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:.00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control on tranprIrtaf impacts, if any: r -- .l.i l/li The developer will be dedicating right-of-way to the City_ and proposes to construct all roadways within t,_ _ City Standards, as required by�the City Engineerl.� pint to 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other?) If so, generally describe. No increased need is expected, as all public services and facilities exist. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle the util ° - currently availabl the site: Water J refuse service. arlitary s_ e_ were septic system, irrigation, drains, other. b. Describe the utilities that are ,- �,�,ed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the vicinity immediate __ y which might be needed. No new 'utilities are proposed for the project. Normal trenching for the extension of existing underground 'utilities can be expected. .DOC, °sNDEX. -13- 3 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent or Person Completing Form -14- FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER E Comment Letters Received EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE E-1 Comment Letter Received from Gwen Clear, State of Washington Department of Ecology 7/1/05 E-2 Comment Letter Received from Terri Trisler 7/6/05 E-3 Comment Letter Received from Roger and Laura Ridd 7/6/05 E-4 E Mail Received from Brad Trisler 7/6/05 E-5 E Mail Received from Iry and Nancy Benson 7/13/05 E-6 Letter Received from Les OrneIas, Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority 7/13/05 E-7 Letter Received from John and Nancy Durham 1522 S. 67th Ave. 7/26/05 E-8 Letter from The Irwins, 1529 S. 69th Ave. 8/6/05 E-9 Letter from Bill Davison, 1521 S. 68th Ave. 9/6/05 E-10 Letter from Jill Davison, 1521 S. 68th Ave. 9/6/05 E-11 Letter from Michael ?, 1440 S. 68th Ave. 9/6/05 E-12 Letter from Jeffrey J. Henjum, 1441 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-13 Letter from Jeff & Linda Henjum, 1441 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-14 Letter from Teresa Ishijka, 1424 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-15 Letter from Monty CarI, 1428 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-16 Letter from Vivian Carl, 1428 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-17 Letter from Mildred B. Pursley, 1429 S. 69th Ave. 9/6/05 E-18 Letter from Sharon Madsen, 1522 S. 68th Ave. 9/6/05 E-19 Fax from Sarah L. Wixson 9/7/05 Ua_ UIf UUa 10:46 rAX 509 453 6880 VELIKANJE LAW } } `=•lika flje Moore & Shore, P.S. attorna s at law VMS NAME AND TELECOPIER NO.: John S. Moore Morris 6. Shore George F. Velikanje Alan D. Campbell' James C, Carmody Carter L Field Jeff Peters 575-6105 J. Jay Carroll Mark E. Flakes Douglas L Federspiel Brendan V. Monahan Kevan T. Montoya Travis W. Misfeldt XJ ow. Garen K. Jones Jamas S. Elliott Sarah L Wixson K Mark Cox DATE: September 7, 2005 FROM : Sarah L. Wixson TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER 2 Frank Baehm Property Tile pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential Information from the Velikauje Law Firm. This information Is intended for use by the named recipie.t. Ifyoa are not the intended recipient; be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or ase of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. We are transmltttng to yon from an automatic Cannon L770 Facsimile telceopicr (509/453.aao). If yon are no receiving properly or should for roma reason not receive all pages, please telephone .s immediately at 509/248-6030. 'rank you, • • • • Operator 405 East Lincoln Amanita P.O. Box 22550 Yakima WA 98907 (509) 24&6030 faoc (509) 453-6880 www.wnslaw.00m DOS":. INDEX 09'07/2005 16:46 FAX 509 453 6880 VELIKANJE LAW [21002 Velika tje Moore & Shore, P.s. wttur iinyS iii law w September 7, 2005 Jeff Peters Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Re; Frank Baebm 1419 S. 72nd Avenue Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Peters: John S. Moore Morris 6. Shore George F. V@IIKanle Alan D. Campbell Jamas C. Carmody Carter L Hold J, Jay Carroll Mark E. Fides Douglas L Federspiel Brendan V. Monahan Kevan T. Montoya Travis W. Misfeldt Via Fax: 575-6105 Caron K. Jonas James S. Elliott Sarah L Wixson K. Mark Cox iSiscsiveyo SSP � 7 204 5 P141CITY4 ,. _ By way of introduction, I represent the Baehms. I have been given the authority to withdraw their previous objection to the development of their property. They support the development conditioned only upon the sale of the property to Mr. Olson. They have neither the means nor the intent to develop the property themselves. Itl you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, VELIKANJE, MOORE & SHORE, P.S. Sarah L. Wixson SLW:dg 405 East iincoln Avenue P.O. E►ax 22550 Yakima, WA 98907 (509) 248-8030 fox (609) 453-6880 www.vmsievo.com Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street. Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECevED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY QP YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72n1 Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72n1 as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave, from South 72nd to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, W*Jk-\.OLOaci oOC. INDEX E. - aa Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department Depart -- This ull�ld 1, This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72"d Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72nd to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69t° and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this --- of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to t"e east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in f proposal that addracer a this issue. There is dearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of Due to expense the existing neighborhood property Ly V wiser �. the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have concerns what ill be placed - this grave about will t,►acCu on properly. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72"d Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA P11 A .1.11.1/' rtl%i TLntvtntvu ui v. August 6, 2005 Sincerely, 1426 3 0Th Pols DOC. INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69t" Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72"d to South 69th Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot 115 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. DOC. INDEX E�/‘ Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA. . 9890$ Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, +� (.+ .vitt, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 ITV OF VAKIMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of M • d Avenue through to 67th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72nd to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69ti' and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhoodDue the property owners. to ULlG6t ifI1pA(:L on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? ▪ This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having Less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, em,e �g Ave, DOC: INDEX # 6-i Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72"d to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent _proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term_for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, 14a4. toa Tflo�� INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA yisyw Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIIw4 PLANNING DIV August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of proposal. the vs this j�svj�Vsal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension ofPall Avenue through to 69th Ave.not essential r this d th. oughAveis essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72nd to South 69th Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in t proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property, owners. to the on the property ,,' Due the direct impact 6116 existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent. proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will, be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. ,e4q -DOC. INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street. Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72"d to South 696 Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, DOC. INDEX #"ia-' rnonnew Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, W 1-! 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY ur Y AKIMNMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69`l' to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through �01h A.... not essential r_ this through to �. Ade. is essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72'1 to South 69th Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70' Avenues. = The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiting owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighhnrhood property owners. to direct impact - - - --o---------- r-..1,.,..., Due the on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. ® Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be this P_ applications have placed on property. Previous aYplll:ti.l1Ui15 not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? ▪ This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, 144.(3 03' DOC. INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72"d to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, DOC. INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street .. Yakima, VYt1 787V8 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69h Ave. is not essential for this is congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72' to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70"' Avenues. The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as weil as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5, In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to *''e east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood owners. to direct impact on _ neighborhood propertyDue the direct the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? ® This - . - - osal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates lobs. Any creation of :'' ., i,., Ali jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. RECEIVED SEP 0 6 2005 CITY OF YAKIIMA PLANNING DIV. August 6, 2005 Sincerel L - �,-+r L_ - INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129•N. 2nd Street: - Yakima,; WA 98908' . Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, CITY OF YAKIMA CODE ADMIN. DIVISION AUG 10 2005 C'REC'VD FAXEDO OPAID FYI El August 6, 2005 This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. As homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division and are writing to oppose for the following reasons: • Increased traffic through out neighborhood will be a direct result of this proposal. The applicant talks about the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd as being necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd will help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased, in fact this proposal would only create additional traffic. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72nd to South 696 Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as'well as incompatible multi -family housing. Nearly everyone that purchased a home in this area did so because the subdivision was quiet and closed without a through street. We request that Mead Avenue be dead -ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. • The construction of "common -wall" homes on smaller lots, as well as several duplexes in the proposed subdivision is a concern. The applicant is vague and has not specifically addressed the guarantee of ownership for this property. Because of this we have additional concerns for further development of this property, specifically lot #5. In order for this proposal to even begin to be compatible we request that, at a minimum, restrictive covenants be put in place requiring owner -occupied housing and the subdivision be completed without the proposed duplexes. The smaller lot size and the need for administrative adjustments to increase land usage is just another example of why this proposal is not compatible with the existing neighborhood to the east. Further, a land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. Due to the direct impact on the existing neighborhood by the extension of Mead Ave. it is essential that the new development be compatible, or not be connected by a through street. • Perhaps the biggest concern with this application is the future of Lot #5. The current proposal makes no mention of this lot or the plans for what is to be built on this lot. Due to recent proposals made for development of this land we have grave concerns about what will be placed on this property. Previous applications have not been compatible with our single-family residential homes. How does the construction of "common -wall" units and duplexes affect the zoning for Lot #5? We fear that it is further paving the way for additional NON- COMPATIBLE development. The applicant has not sufficiently addressed the future of Lot #5 but it seems clear that it will not contain additional common wall units or duplexes. How can this proposal be accepted without a knowledge of what will happen with Lot #5? • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units, This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptions, questionable logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the; land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals (Goal H3, "to Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods") as well as the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and see the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. Sincerely, /‘d9 e? DOC, INDEX RECEIVED JUL 2 8 2005 c. _ITv OF YAK�M, PLANNING DIV July 25, 2005 RF: cityFile# 19-05, Pete v1sUnfF rank tsaenm To Whom It May Concern: We have just recently moved into the neighborhood where this duplex development has been proposed. We were unaware of this proposed project when purchasing the property and just recently heard news of it. One of the major considerations in our purchase of this property was the quiet, low traffic, safe residential area. We must protest this development on the basis that it will lower the value of our homes, cause an unwanted increase in traffic, and possibly increase crime due to lower priced housing. We strongly oppose Mead Avenue connecting through to 72nd. This would allow more access to current homes thus increasing traffic and the possibility of more criminal activity. proposed level , 3 This �-awr��,.,,,... development would cause traffic t0 be greatly increased and the noise levels to rise making it a much less desirable neighborhood in which to live. We strongly oppose this development and think it would have a negative ;,,,pact on the neighborhood. Please consider current homeowners and their concerns about proposed changes to a lovely area and please do not approve this proposed construction. Regards, 104 to John and Nancy Durham 1522 S. 67th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Filed Hearing Examin EXH # 7 Date _ 1 File # &' Id 4t..3 -0.- 1i alrima Regional Glean Air Authority July 13, 2005 Doug Maples, Code Administration and Planning Manager City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 No 2'd St Yakima, WA 98901 RE: Notice off• plication & Public Hearing Dear Mr. Mapl Please accep our apo y for the lateness of our comment. Our comment on Notice ;of Application & Public Hearing for Pete Olson, for Frank Baehm, to subdivide 5.17 acres into 28 lots located at 1419 S 72nd Ave in Yakima, WA follows: Notification of Demolition and Renovation (NODR) Per §3.07 of YRCAA Regulations; Survey Requirements: Prior to any demolition, or renovation work, an asbestos survey must be conducted. Notification Requirements: For demolition, a Notification of Demolition and Renovation (NODR), must be filed with and approved by YRCAA. For renovation, only when the work would disturb asbestos, must an NODR be filed. The NODR fee is based on quantity of asbestos to be removed. Second St., Suite 1016, Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509)834-2050, Fax: (509)834-2060 http://www.co.yakima.wa.us/cleanair Removal Requirements: All asbestos must be removed prior to demolition. For renovation, only when the work would disturb asbestos, must the asbestos be removed. Dust Control If the project includes any work that would disturb soil stability, it is subject to the requirement to submit a dust control plan. A construction dust plan must be filed with, and approved by, YRCAA.` The dust contro 1 plan needs to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases, per §3.08A of YRCAA Regulations. Proponent is also encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for projects planned now and in the future. The fee for a Master Construction Dust Control Plan is $226. Thank yo for for your continued support in helping the air quality in Yakima County. Sincer Les Ornefas Air Pollution Control Officer /ch as m/wpfiles/pe rmittin g/SE PA/City_of_Yakima/Map Yakima/Maples_NOAAPH_Pete_Olson_13July05 ei{v "DOC. INDEX Peters, s, Jeff From: Sent: TO: ibenson3788@charter.net Wednesday .h i!y 1 3 7n05 7:de PM jpeters@clyakima.wa.us Recently we have received a notice in the mail in reference to land use near our home at 1441 So 68th ave. My wife and I were not in favor of the Day -Care center on 72nd ave and were please to see that the individuals who made the request had withdrawn it. I strongly believe that this area is not the place for a day care center. However, the reason for this e-mail is no longer the day care center, but the type of homes now planned for the same land. In looking at the plans it seems that these homes will be on extremely small plots of land and the majority of these home would be rentals. The proposal indicates that Mead would expand to reach 72nd ave. I do not believe that rentals so close to the tvnaR of homes n our the interest and investment of our vneighborhood ywould �bed bprotectede combif. the cityddidsenothat allow Mead to be expanded to reach 72nd ave. On a side note - has the impact of such concentrated home on Widehollow school been considered? It is my understanding the Widehollow is already over crowded. I could be wrong, since our daughter now attends the Junior high. Thank you for taking 1g file time to read this. Iry and Nancy Benson 1441 so 68th ave Yakima, Wa P.s. We did not receive the second mailing on the land use proposal, Please send one to our home, 1 uuug maples Peters, Jeff Page l of 2 From: Trisler2001 @charter. net Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:17 AM To: jpeters@ci.yaldma.wa.us Subject: land use proposal Jeff Peters City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 July 6, 2005 Terri Trisler 1521 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Peters: RECEIVED JUL .0 7 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. I am writing to oppose the division of the long plat in the manner proposed for the following reasorig: ► The rationale for extending Meade Avenue is not essential for the success of this project. The proposal clearly states no traffic generated from this proposal will go east into the established neighborhood because there is no reason to go there, nor an outlet towards that direction. Those of us living to the east and south of this proposed development are able to exit off of King Street without difficulty. I request that Meade Ave. be dead ended. • This proposal states that it is compatible with existing neighborhoods. The neighborhood to the west and south, and east of the proposed area was built without an administrative adjustment. This proposal requests a 10% adjustment from the zoning ordinance, which is in effect a 22% increase in land usage resulting in an increased population density beyond what the current standard is. The rationale of strict enforcement wilt result in a custom unit is not a valid one. A smaller number of units and larger size would negate this need. In addition, this proposal calls for lots that are approximately between 5,000 and 6,000 feet. There are about 50 homes to the east of this proposed development that sit on approximately 8,000 square feet lots. This proposal is not compatible with existing homes. • This proposal states that without the administrative land adjustment that two of the units within the development will be smaller than surrounding units. In actuality there is also an option of building less duplexes and/or larger homes. A small piece of land could also be left as a common area for children to play. • A land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. • This proposal states that the entire project is a classic infill project due to a church, single-family residence and two-family residences surrounding it. In reality, most of this development is surrounded by single-family residences, which are primarily, if not all, owned by homeowners who live there. There are only single family homes to the east, south, and west of this proposed development that have been in existence for a minimum of 10 years, and some 20 and more. There are about 50 homes to the east that are in the $200,000 value range. None of thAbo,mes to INDEX 7/7/2005 1V14 J1CS Page 2 of 2 the east, south, and west are common wall units nor are they rental properties. The applicant himself notes he is not aware of any Land adjustments to land nearby. In addition, due to their smaller size, the proposed value of these homes is considerably Tess than the existing homes. This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates jobs. Any creation of jobs will be short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs long- term jobs. This will ...,.,,... from economic _ come economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, I am asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours. There is clearly a demand in this area for homes in the $200,000 price range, Sincerely, Brad Trisler 7/7/2005 INDEX Doug Maples City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 July 6, 2005 Dear Mr. Maples and Planning Department, RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2005 CITY Of YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. -This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately homeowners in the neighborhood immediately to the east of the proposed application we have a number of serious concerns regarding this division. This is the third letter we have written regarding this property in less than a year and would like to see a proposal for future use that is actually compatible with the current zoning and surrounding land uses. We feel that any development of this property should be consistent and compatible with our neighborhood, especially if the proposed Mead Ave. is constructed thus opening our neighborhood to whatever is built on said property. This proposal has several incorrect assumptions and also leaves several questions unanswered or open, causing us to wonder when we will be receiving yet another notice and get to write yet another letter. We are writing to oppose the division of the long plat in the manner proposed for the following reasons: • The application refers repeatedly to the "traffic congestion at the intersection of South 72nd and West King Street". As residents of the existing neighborhood we find there is little congestion at this intersection, at anytime ofdthe day, and can exit and enter King Street without difficulty. The congestion is at West Mead and South 72nd. The applicant has confused the real issue by stating the extension of Mead from South 69th to 72nd is necessary to help with traffic. A signal at Mead and 72nd would help with traffic congestion, especially during peak school drop off and pick up times, but the extension of Mead Avenue through to 69th Ave. is not essential for this congestion to be eased. The proposal clearly states no traffic generated from this proposal will go east into the established neighborhood because there is no reason to go there, nor an outlet towards that direction. We do not feel the extension of Mead Ave from South 72r1 to South 69`h Ave is necessary, and leaves the existing neighborhood open to additional traffic as well as incompatible multi -family housing. As homeowners we must take the city at their word that the housing goal (Goal H3, as found in the Yakima Urban Area comprehensive Plan, page III -9) is to "Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods". The extension of Mead, especially on both the West and East through this existing neighborhood, would directly contradict this goal by making the neighborhood a route to the schools on the west of the neighborhood. Our neighborhood would be changed for the worse, and definitely not "preserved", if Mead Ave is allowed to be connected through from 72nd, and possibly from 64th in the future. We request that Mead Avenue be dead- • ended, or a cul-de-sac be placed in the proposed subdivision between South 69th and South 70th Avenues. We would like to request a class III review for the placement of duplexes in the proposed subdivision. The applicant states the proposed duplexes are compatible "because the neighborhood is a mixed-use neighborhood". The neighborhood to the east is not a mixed-use neighbor hood and would be directly impacted by the proposed subdivision if Mead Ave. is constructed as proposed. The other duplexes or multi- family housing in the area does not access single-family homes but exits exclusively to 72nd Ave. The applicant also states that the duplexes will provide "affordable rental housing for middle income people and fits in with the surrounding neighborhood". The proposed size of the duplexes would call their "affordability" into question. In addition the applicant refers to "several duplex and common wall developments" in the West Valley area. Do these similar developments abut such large single family neighborhoods and do they propose • to share common streets as would occur here with the construction of Mead from 72nd to 69th? We also wonder what the distinction is between the "common wall" homes and the duplexes. The applicant has requested an administrative adjustment for lot coverage to make the duplexes as large as the common wall units, in order to "create a theme". What then is the difference between the duplex and the common wall? \Ve are led to assume, but the applicant doesn't really state, that these would be owner -occupied. What covenants would be in place to guarantee this? Later the applicant states the need to build "larger units" on some of the larger lots, wouldn't this ruin the proposed "theme"? This proposal states that without the administrative,194 adjustment that two of the units within the development will be smaller than surrounding units. In actual there are options to build larger homes instead instead of duplexes, which would be compatible with surrounding homes. A small piece of land could also be left as a common area for children to play. ® This proposal states that it is compatible with existing neighborhoods. The neighborhood to the west and south, and east of the proposed area was built with out an administrative adjustment T"_ is pradjustment from the zoning ordinance, which is in effect a 22% increase in land usageoposal resulting nests an increased population density beyond what the current standard is. The rationale of strict enforcement will result in a custom Unit is not a.aha one. one. A smaller number of units and larger size would negate this need. In addition, this proposal calls for lots that are approximately between 5,000 and 6,000 feet. There are about 50 homes to the east of this proposed development that sit on approximately 8,000 square feet lots. The applicant himself notes he is not aware of any land adjustments to land nearby. This proposal is not compatible with existing homes which would be connected to the development by Mead Ave. • A land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the dexpense of the existing neighborhood property owners. It is also unclear what will developed on the evelopment ..�C TT_.7 _ _be uv pLiill,ICL1 Lot 5 in r mens, o1 iiedgewood, again leaving us wondering what else will directly effect our neighborhood by the proposed extension of Mead. • This proposal states that the entire project is a classic infill project due to a church, single-family residence and two-family residences surrounding it. In reality; most of this development is surrounded by single-family residences, which are primarily, if not all, owned by homeowners who lip.e there. ily homes to the east, south, and west of this proposed development which have been n existen enly for minimum of 10 years, and some 20 and more.. There are about 50 homes to the east that are in the $200,000 price range. None of the homes to the east, south, and west are common wall units nor are they rental properties. In addition, due to their smaller size, proposed ...,,.._ _rl, the -the value of mese homes is considerably less than existing There• ;,, ..,_ the is also the question of Lot 5 that is not answered in the application. No mention and it shown to be significantly lamer than the nthero Given the oflot 5 is made is concerned about what is to be developed on this lot, especially if Meadts Ave.or this Ae. accesses our neighborhoodproperty to the we are very east. • This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it jobs. Any of proposal jobs will be gl;oifi_te,..,, for the creates Any creation, ilii construction of these units. This community needs long-term jobs. This will come from economic development a the the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, we are opposed to the development of Hedgewood, as proposed, and feel it would impact the adjacent existing neighborhoods too dramatically to be compatible. There are too many unanswered questions, assumptiono questionable: logic and unclear statements in the application. We are asking that the land adjacent to us be ..a.r.a...�, developed with homes of similar value to ours and feel they can be accessed from 72nd Ave, thus having less impact on existing neighborhoods. As homeowners in Yakima we feel strongly the need to have development compatible to surrounding neighborhoods. We hope that you consider the housing goals, the concerns felt and expressed by residents in this area, and the real impact this proposed development will have on all concerned. We have repeatedly felt that our concerns and investments are not important to "the city", please show us that theyare b ydeny-„b .t1- proposal. Sincere Roger L. ' 'dd and Laura H. Ridd 1526 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 (509) 972-3144 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 21305 CITY OF YAK IMA PLANNING DIV. "DOC: INDEX Jeff Peters City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98908 July 6, 2005 Tem Trisler 1521 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Dear Mr. Peters: RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. This letter is in reference to the division of the long plat of approximately 5.17 acres at 1419 S. 72nd Avenue. am writing to oppose the division of the long plat in the manner proposed for the following reasons: • The rationale for extending Meade Avenue is not essential for the success of this project. The proposal clearly states no traffic generated from this proposal will go east into the established neighborhood because there is no reason to go there, nor an outlet towards that direction. Those of us living to the east and south of this proposed development are able to exit off of King Street without difficulty. I request that Meade Ave. be dead ended. • This proposal states that it is compatible with existing neighborhoods. The neighborhood to the west and south, and east of the proposed area was built without an administrative adjustment This proposal requests a 10% adjustment from the zoning ordinance, which is in effect a 22% increase in land usage resulting in an increased population density beyond what the current standard is. The rationale of strict enforcement will result in a custom unit is not a valid one. A smaller number of units and larger size would negate this need. In addition, this proposal calls for lots that are approximately between 5,000 and 6,000 feet. There are about 50 homes to the east of this proposed development that sit on approximately 8,000 square feet lots. This proposal is not compatible with existing homes. • This proposal states that without the administrative land adjustment that two of the units within the development will be smaller than surrounding units. In actuality there is also an option of building less duplexes and/or larger homes. A small piece of land could also be left as a common area for children to play. • A land adjustment of this size will affect resale value of existing homes. There is nothing in this proposal that addresses this issue. There is clearly a desire to maximize the profit of the landowner and developer at the expense of the existing neighborhood property owners. • This proposal states that the entire project is a classic infill project due to a church, single- family residence and two-family residences surrounding it. In reality, most of this development is surrounded by single-family residences, which are primarily, if not all, owned by homeowners who live there. There are only single family homes to the east, south, and west of this proposed development that have been in existence for a minimum of 10 years, and some 20 and more. There are about 50 homes to the east that are in the $200,000 value range. None of the homes to the east, south, and west are common wall units nor are they rental properties. The applicant himself notes he is not aware of any land adjustments. to land nearby. In addition, due to their smaller size, the proposed value of these homes is considerably less than the existing homes. DCC. =. INDEX This proposal suggests that it is in the best interest of the community because it creates lobs. Any creation of jobs will ham. short-term for the construction of these units. This community needs Tong -term jobs. This will come from economic development by the city, not from building a few duplexes. In summary, i am asking that the land adjacent to us be developed with homes of similar value to ours. There is clearly a demand in this area for homes in the $200,000 price range. Sincerely, Terri A. Trisler INDEX # STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 15 West Yakima Avenue, Suite 200 • Yakima, Washington 98902-3452 • (509) 575-2490 July 1, 2005 Doug Maples City of Yakima Dept. of Community Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Your address is in the Lower Yakima watershed Dear Mr. Maples: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the preliminarily mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the divide of 5.17 acres into 28 lots, proposed by Pete Olson and Frank Baehm [EC 19-05]. We have reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. Water Quality Erosion control measure must be in place prior to any clearing, grading or construction. These control measures must be able to prevent soil from being carried into surface water (this includes storm drains) by stormwater runoff. A stormwater construction permit from Washington State Dept. of Ecology may be required if there is a potential for discharge from a construction site larger than one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Erosion Sediment Control Plan) is needed for all permitted construction sites. Please contact Ray Latham, at the Dept. of Ecology, (509) 575-2807, to determine if your site needs such a permit. Water Resources The water purveyor is responsible for ensuring that the proposed use(s) are within the limitations of its water rights. If you have any questions concerning the Water Resources comments, please contact Scott Turner at (509) 457-7106. Gwen Clear Environmental Review Coordinator Central Regional Office (509) 575-2012 746 EXHIBIT # F-1 FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER F Application DOCUMENT Application DATE 4/29/05 CITY OF YAKIMA: LAND USE APPLICATION �������� A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2 9 2005 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR CITY QF YAK��, p� YAHIMA, WASHINGTON 98901 P��'NG DIV VOICE: (5,09) 575-6183 FAX. (509) 575 -6105 +41 Y Li .aa: *vcaalLti. ®., s 6aLs s z.�� ... ff� K Pj Answ� er all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application processscall,ccome in person or refer the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART 1- GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CER'1'!HCATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot acce t an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. p 1. APPLICANT Z MESSAGE ( NAME FRAA L BA eh* OWNER REPRESENTATIVE OTHER S. PROPERTY OWNER'S STREET cit f� Q ADDRESS AND PHONE - 2..00 ,rule CITY lr,ee4 (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STATE (4 4 ZIP 9,00 PHONE (Sc ! 'ESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY ) 9b _ 07 Z Z MESSAGE ( /8432 - - 30/ c /8/33 Z — %Z.vo 3 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: —/ 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)) Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Appeal ❑ Nonconforming Structure/Use Preliminary Subdivision 0 Short Plat Class (2) Use ❑ Class (3) Use 0 Rezone ❑ Variance ❑ Home Occupation tg Administrative Adjustment 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Right -of -Way Vacation Short Plat Exemption Shoreline Utility Easement Release Interpretation by Hearing Examiner Other Ie_ C A44t e ..............•:.:.:.,-,>:x-.r,:m-�.�>.<.,.:ae>�.r �LMrr� w-::.'� ,e��;' ; 4: � _,--�• r.,..s:< < -,. 3•> `��`� r':5 r�'oik,'',:��5' ,:�,�„...<., <.; �,.�� >„ _ 11.- information ti , that t - ����. tion on this application and the required attachments are true and correct to the best ofmyknowlectge. Revised 9-98 DATE F FAD SIGNATURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY • } APPLICATION FOR: • PRELIMINASUBDJ vl�Jl,. IS O � CITY OF YARIMA SUBDIVISON ORDINANCE • RECEIVED APRY�1�� 2 9 2005'" CIL�T`''////QF vE 1. PROPERTY `�' O�''NER 'List all persons and financial - ' institutions that have a financial or ownership interest in the property: (Attach if lengthy). r �•• • ••, Name and address Name and address 1 2. SURVEYOR AND ADDRESS RZA P -A 14 (1_1,---_,01.4,0". 3. MAIN CONTACT+� e)g "1©Z- erson who should receive correspondence and be availalbe to answer questions) _111/C) u- ) 1+w • A, 2- �"T /✓L,� ,._ _ . a / a Df 4. GENERAL. LOCATION OF PROPERTY (Address if available). /4447 5i 94 4-.-~4 444 , _5_ NAS fly SIT DIMS,. ' vj UVDLIVIJUN t•�(,e3®e5ii 6. PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS/i� aNGE OF LOT SIZES i g i n -r vv lei] 7. SITE FEATURES A) General description of the site (Check „ that „� all apply) 121 Flat 0 gental slopes ❑steep slopes B) Are there any indications of hazards associated with unstable soils such as slides or slipping in the area? OYES NO Describe: C) Is the Property in a 100 year oodplain or other critical area as defined by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)? 0 YRS NO 8 • UTILITIES AND SERVICES A) Indicate the source of domestic water and sewage disposal method:. >MeS T iCItit/�_ �� O!ssPOs , — �� o F ' i is-r%ic B) Check which of the following is available: Electricity 'Telephone I'Cable TV If Natural IXCable i Y IA lV ZIL�,lral Gas C) Is irrigation water available to the pro erry`t ❑ J Cie -AC) 3 y 3c-75"7 D) Distance to nearest fire hydrant: '4 �, �-` -o,r �By whom: � r E) Name of nearest street: _- a n -f F) Name of nearest school: Method of handling surface water drainage: — i iffiro I herebyauthorize t t _ - '" the submittal or"thepreliminary�����,.,.��.�.���:;N����,�r� � « -, .� tions of approval such as dedication of right-of-way, leasepments, restrictionsapplication e it �o heaki type of buildingsreview. I understand that condl- and access restrictions from public roads may be imposed as a part of preliminary plat approval ad that failureb me -hese conditions may result in denial of the final plat. p to mee Property Owner(s) Date U. INDEX F --- page 2 of 2 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR: CLASS (2) REVIEW RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. CHAPTER 15.14 AND 15.15, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) 4• f • f�,•••:•+• •+••,^n�t4.rT/':.i.21610114404:::::.e-;,-,:::,...:{ ur: ynr •;}:l+¢f;v+rex.F/.J. x/ yr.arft:§-rf.i{i::: .;.f:4u::0:xlf% .;:., .•{r},rf}! 1. PROPOSED LAND USE TYPE Im.ortant: Must be taken From Table 4-1 of the Urban Area Zonin. Ordinance 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: CA ogrQ.—) Attach if len • th AaTigcttE � ifs?.:?:; x,74- . %: i i.r.;frG!+, . AG.!.d;•rr vi,: es. - ic:'r: • .r r rrr 6.,%•-•e , rr /1Jifr /!�, i ,.•.!/r!' • LG .£• y•y. ..: , 'r+/t,�' ,f„:.•: wif ,, •4 r, , / f rl.•rri' .i i r/ vF f :°i%% iY' ;:•+ .; ..,i:!;'i;r• • ,i ,+,^p'{ firy'`;:%%/.rr/,,•lr?r,✓r+%/,:. ,rry�.r r/ OM :.ri• '. f6IF:r f ✓.f } •• r • AVIV %% f . . : ,• fj,. „ . rr 5. SITE PLAN UIRED rr••+tt tt.f.� t.• .... } Yyrs:• $ •r. !fti :y �-:/e' e ,. - ,;% //•.: Q :.(Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) 4 6. A WRITTEN NARRATIVE: Please answer the following ' uestions in the narrative) .. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? Pt 7. AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: If rewired b the Washin:ton State Environmental Polio Act SEPA- Note: If you have any questions about this process please come in person to the Planning Division, 129 North 2nd St. Yakima, WA or call the Planning Division at (509) 575-6183, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 pnn. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE U S E ONLY For Class (2) Applications, the proposed development requires Class (2) Review for the following reasons: Listed as a Class (2) use in Table 4-1; or, Structural or other physical site improvements are proposed or required by this title, and the use has frontage on a designated collector or arterial road (single-family dwellings, duplexes, and their accessory structures are exempt from this provision); or 111 or part of the parcel proposed for development is in the Flood Plain, Airport, or Greenway Overlay Districts; or, Ile proposed use includes hazardous materials; or, A mobile or manufactured home listed as a Class (2) use in Section 15.04.120.O D\JVr INDEX Revised 5-04 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR: CLASS (2) Pte , ori. UT 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV, .....:.:,..- :.\{':::::v%;:•^,•::'•`:•'.'.�•-}:•'$� ...;�.•!::'iY .+.w.; i.:} .- .. ji•v..- f: {.:... Yr .:...v...f.?•r'..•'i%Sr iu.+: ^•.::i::v iY.:; .:.%...v. av: {.::{.::r v:.. ...... n. .......??.v:?vu;.:{y}.;,�.••.;..}}f:i{.}vi•{?:.%:.:•'?:i:}?,vx:..:.?•:.•, }, •v:rr xi:{•v\r:.}:?:.?•Y:i?v}:vf:•?Yiv:•: {{:.v\?:v}:.v:::.:v+...::. ,��,..."f.{v.�:: •: !v'.1}:{:•}:{u•}}:•}':•}:{:{. :3.. : }}itit?:;n: `:'•.t:%•>.:;•.{:.?:? fv �{{.:v},:.v :+.•}�:.{:::::'.ti.:•}i:ti?:: rir:? ii•: s:^}'.v •:...'.:G • • $' ::::ti.*.fit: ?P °: {:F}'•; i<•} v 5. SITE PLAN REQUIRED: Please.><...:.:fi}...,,::{{:?;:{�:h:}}�:>:.•:::}>;::>:::,�':::;fv�:�:;:;�':;:;::='}?>;:::N;:<',::,:-�.;�,: use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checkiist) 6. A WK TI-TF"N NARRATIVE:rryE : (Please answer the following s uestions in the narrative) A. Fully describe the proposed development, ,• opmen6, including number of housing units andarkin spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? 7. AN E v IROiviviEN•T'AL CHECKLIST: the IT f re b thWashin ton State Environmental Polic Act SEPA Note: If you have any questions about this process please come in person to the Planning Division, 129 North 2nd St. Yakima, WA or call the PIanning Division at (509) 575-6183, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE U S E ONLY For Class (2 ) Applications. the proposed development reauires Class (2) Review for the following reasons: Listed as a Class (2) use in Table 4-1; or, • Structural or other physical site improvements are proposed or required by this title, and the use has frontage on a designated collector or arterial road (single-family dwellings, duplexes, and their accessory structures are exempt from this provision); or All or part of the parcel proposed for development is in the Flood Plain, Airport, or Greenway Overlay Districts; or, The proposed use includes hazardous materials; or, A mobile or manufactured home listed as a Class (2) use in Section 15.04.120, DC., INDEX Revised 8-04 Administrative Adjustment CHAPTER 15.10, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION 1. TYPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT RE UESTED ( at least one): o SETBACKS: Front Side Rear o FENCES o PARKING o SITESCREENING o SIGNS: Height Size LOT COVERAGE THER 2. AMOUNT OF ADJUSTMENT: 46- 90 on,„ finance requirement s's '7 Proposed standard Adjustment requested 3. PROPOSED USE: (Important.- Must be taken From Table 4 - 1, of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance) D Eu -14)4, Q te°t.-t_x. �o j0 1,EGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPE TY. Attach if lengthy) RECEIVE! APR 2 9 200E CITY OF YAKIMI PLANNING DIV. PART III - REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS 5. SITE PLAN REQUIRED• (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) 6. AWRITTEN NARRATIVE: (Please submit a written response to the following items: A. How would the strict enforcement of the current standard affect your project? Why is the adjustment requested? B. How is the proposal compatible with neighboring properties? Have other adjustments been granted nearby? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? M '' A.N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (If required by the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)) a: If you have any questions about this process please come in person to the Planning Division, 129 North h d St.9-98 Yakima, WA or call the Planning Division at (509) 575 -6183, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. 60050-111 Revised INDEX -, Wv I i TEN NA RATIVW (Administrative Adjustment) RECEIVED ADD a) i u oa .eo N 4% 4UU3 CITY OF YAXIr wi PLANNING DIV. 7.. How would strict enforcement of the current standard affect your project? Why is the adjustment requested? Strict enforcement of the -rce ent current lot coverage standard would require that dwelling units be constructed to a smaller size on Lots 6'and 24. This requires builders to adjust building material length to odd sizes and generally requires a custom unit to be constructed to meet special building size requirements. The adjustment is � being requested because the developer would like to create a for the neighborhood and have all housing units relatively the same size. Without the adjustment, two of the units within the development would be smaller than surrounding un;tc B. How is the proposal compatible with neighboring properties? Have other adjustments been granted nearby? r1 The proposed duplexes compatible �m�N,,_,L,_ because the neighborhoodyisarr,iXed�„se wltn surrounding land uses project of Hedgewood abuts a multi-familydevelopmentonhe thentire north, a church, single-family residences and two-family residences to the west and northwest and single-family residences along the south and east r classic infill project and isPgenerally located=inect the1s baca kyards of most surrounding residences. Additionally, uSes within the Fiat of Hedgewood are proposed to be attached single-family dwellings -- Common wall. Two duplexes will have the look and feel of the common mall units that are by the biggerapplication. The agrtnot know of any other adjusmentswhichhave been rantednearby. DOC I NDEX C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and. _ Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? The proposal is consistent with current zoning because the zoning ordinance permits administrative adjustments when one or more of the following objectives can be accomplished: a. Allow buildings to be sited in a manner which maximizes solar access; b. Allow zero lot line or common wall construction in conformance with the provisions of this title; c. Coordinate development with adjacent land uses and the physical features of this title; d. Permit flexibility in the design and placement of structures and other site improvements; e. Allow development consistent with a specific sub -area plan adopted by either the city or county. In this instance,the adjustment complies with c and d above. The proposal will coordinate development with the proposed uses contemplated by the Plat of Hedgewood. The adjustment permits flexibility in the design and placement of the proposed structure so as to ensure compatibility with neighboring uses. because it allows uses on undesirable corner lots and projects a theme of uniformity between the duplexes and common wall units. D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? This proposal is in the best interest of the community because it increases affordable rental housing and creates jobs. The proposal ties West Mead Avenue and South 72nd Avenue together and creates a better traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood as a whole. The proposal also creates safe walking conditions for children and .students. This proposal also makes good use of developable land within the urban area. Because it is known that lot coverage will be exceeded by 10 percent, it is possible to design stormwater facilities to accommodate anticipated runoff in the plat design. The proposal also meets the intent of the zoning district and many of the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan as outlined in other portions of this master application. DCC. . INDEX WRITTEN NARRATIVE (mass riCvycw -- Duplexes) RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA Drn 1 A►dnlinuanu nn. o .r,uIY, A. Fully describe the proposed develo _b rt, including number of hoboousing units and parking spaces.. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of o•eration da s es week and all other P pertinent information related to business o erations. The proposal is to construct two duplexes within a common wall development known as the Plat of Hedgewood. The duplexes would be constructed on two corner lots within the development. The lot numbers are Lot 6 and Lot 24. As proposed, the duplexes would be constructed similar in size and all other aspects as the common wall units, which have also been proposed as part of this development. However, they would exceed the lot coverage by about 10 percent. The duplexes would be rental units for middle- income persnnc The duplexes would also have shared road approaches. Each unit will have a two car garage and 2 parking spaces in front of the garage. Tier, foot r� of .individual print of. individual units will generally be 30' x 55', approximately 1,625 square feet in size. A 10' x 15' patio can also be expected. duplex will , p Based on these dimensions, a typical wiles cover apnrnx; matol y 5= Administrative Adjustment is beingg percent of a lot. Thus san e requested for that purpose. All Aother development height limitation anri be met. standards such as lot size, parking spaces, other structural setbacks are proposed to B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation.measures are proposed to promote compatibility? The two lots that are proposed for duplexes are both corner lots. Lot 6 is at the corner of South 72nd Avenue and West Mead Avenue. This will be a very busy intersection as it is expected to relieve traffic congestion at the, intersection of South West King Street because the intersection will be signalized.a d Additionally, the'lot is a triple frontage lot with roadways along the west, north and east sides. This is a perfect location t ; for a rental unit as it abuts a major intersection on and has access on its east side. The desirability for an owner occupied residence at this location is extremely limited. Lot 24 is also a corner lot which is somewhat of an "orphan lot". It is located just about in the middle of the development. The amount of square footage for the lot can accommodate a duplex based on ordinance standards. Construction of a single-family residence would be out of place based on the proposed surrounding development within this proposal. DO, INDEX The proposed duplexes are compatible with surrounding land uses, because the neighborhood is a mixed-use neighborhood. The entire project of Hedgewood abuts a multi -family development on the north, a church., single-family residences and two-family residences to the west and northwest and single-family residences along the south and east property lines. The project is a classic infill project and is generally located in the backyards of most surrounding residences. As proposed, the duplexes would be constructed to all development standards, except lot coverage. Sitescreening will be constructed as required by the ordinance for duplexes in this situation. Because it is known that lot coverage will be exceeded on these two lots, adequate stormwater retention facilities can be installed to mitigate excess runoff and keep it within the plat boundaries. Similar to the entire proposal of Hedgewood, this project will have direct access from the development to West Mead Avenue and then to South 72nd Avenue. Generally, no traffic generated from this proposal will go east into the established neighborhood because there is no reason to go there, nor an outlet towards that direction. Other proposed, mitigation to ensure compatibility includes the creation of the intersection at South 72nd Avenue and West Mead Avenue. This intersection will be signalized with cross walks and have a left turn lane. This will decrease the _traffic flow on West King Street and create a second means of ingress and egress for the developments which use West King Street as their "ONLY" means of ingress and egress. The extension of West Mead Avenue in this manner will also create a safe walking condition for students that need to attend the schools to the west and north. This type of housing permits affordable rental housing for middle-income people and fits in with the surrounding neighborhood. The project is also compatible with neighboring landuses because the proposal is located within the Yakima Urban Area and the West Valley Area. Several duplex and common wall developments similar to this project have been approved throughout the West Valley Area since the adoption of the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. For these reasons, the developer believes the proposal is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. INDEX 1 C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and,. Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of, neiahborinc� proper The proposal is consistent with the zoning district intent, standard intent, and purpose .intent adopted in the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance because it meets the intent of the Single- family e - family Residential (R -l) Zoning District and eall ,development standards in the Urban Area Zoning Ordinanceexcept lot coverage. The proposal is consistent with the goals, policies, objectives, and development criteria adopted in the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan because this development encourages a mixture of housing types and densities, promotes infilling, provides public sewer and water, encourages disposal of surface on-site and encourages development consistent with the general land use pattern in the area. general D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? This proposal is in the best interest of the community increases affordable rental housingand „ =''�, because it housing creates jobs. The proposal ties West Mead Avenue anti South 72nd Avenue together and creates a better traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood as a whole. The proposal also creates safe walking conditions for children and students. This proposal also makes good use of developable land within the urban area. 'DOG, INDEX WRITTEN NARRATIVE (Class 2 Review -- Common Wall) RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. A. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking' spaces. Ifthe proposal: is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. The proposal is to create 24 common wall lots in the proposed Plat of Hedgewood (Lots 1 through 4, Lots 8 through 23 & Lots 25 through 28). As proposed, the lots would generally be between 5,000 square feet in size to about 6,000 square feet in size. The units will have direct access to abutting roadways via shared road approaches. Each unit will have a two car garage and 2 parking spaces in front of the garage. The foot print of individual units will generally be 30' x 55', approximately 1,625 square feet in size. A 10' x 15' patio can also be expected. Based on these dimensions, a typical individual lot will have lot coverage of just under 45 percent. However, some of the proposed lots can accommodate larger units, and in some cases, larger units may be constructed provided development standards are met. All other development standards such as lot size, parking spaces, height limitation and other structural setbacks are proposed to be met. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses because the neighborhood is a mixed-use neighborhood. The proposal abuts a multi -family development on the north, a church, single-family residences and two-family residences to the west andnorthwest and single-family residences along the south and east property lines. The project is a classic infill project and is generally located in the backyards of most surrounding residences. As proposed, a six-foot high view obscuring fence will placed around the development where none exists at this time. This meets Sitescreening Standard "C" of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. It is the most restrictive sit.escreening standard in the ordinance. Additionally, this project will have direct access from the development to West Mead Avenue and then to South 72nd Avenue. Generally, no traffic generated from this proposal will go east into the established neighborhood because there is no reason to go there, nor an outlet towards that direction. DOC,„ INDEX • .� Other- proposed, mitigation to ensure compatibility includes the creation of the intersection at South 72nd. Avenue and West Mead Avenue. This intersection will be signalized with cross? walks and have a left turn lane. This will decrease the traffic flow on West King Street and creat® s egress for the developments which �use i1West d aKing ns fStreet sasand their "ONLY" means of ingress and egress. The extension of West Mead Avenue in this manner will also create a safe walking condition for students that need to attend the schools to the west and north. peoplThis type of housing peliuits affordable housing for middle-income people and fits in with _ e the surrounding neighborhood. hborhoo project is also compatible with neighboring �land �zuses because the proposal is located within the Yakima Urban Area and the West Valley Area. Several duplex and common wall developments similar to this project have been approved- throughout the West Valley Area since the adoption of the Urban Area rohpre e,..s2___ Plan Zoning Ord____ '-'--«��ay Ordinance. ArPA ""•••�� �-'1dC11�1 V �' 1c'1d11 and For these reasons, the developer believes the proposal is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods Is vow,- caro—osal property; and Is our •ro..osal n ei hborin consistent with current zonin The proposal is consistent with the zoning district intent, standard intent,, and purpose intent adopted in the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance because it meets the intent of the Single- family Residential (R_1) Zoning ng District and meets all required development standards, including density requirements, in the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. The proposal is consistent with the goals, policies, objectives, and development criteria adopted in the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan because this development encourages a mixtureof housing types and densities, promotes infilling, provides public sewer and water, encourages disposal of surface drainage on-site and encourages development pm �- land use pattern in the area.consistent with the general Int INDEX D. Is your proposal in the -best interest of the community? This proposal is in the best interest of the community because it increases affordable housing and creates jobs. The proposal ties West Mead Avenue and South 72nd Avenue together and creates a better traffic circulation pattern for the neighborhood as a whole. The proposal also creates safe walking conditions for children and students. INDEX 17� LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL 18 ► 3 32 12.°°3 THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, NORTHWEST QUARTER, NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 13 - NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M. AND THE SOUTH 124.62 FEET OF THE Sr)! UTHWESST QUARTER, SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.A. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 145 FEET OF THE WEST 240 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Pt BEGINNING AT OF THE SOUT7 (WEST �•�+••+ THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M.; THENCE NORTH 1`0V20* WEST, ALONG G THE WEST LINE THEREOF, 124062 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'34110" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 40.01 FEET, TO THE EAST LINE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO YAKIMA COUNTY FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S FILE NO.'S 1315320 AND 3038876, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'34'10" EAST, 360.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°03'20" EAST, 99.61 FEET, TO A POINT SITUATE 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89'34'10" WEST, PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH LINE, 159.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 025'50" EAST, 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8914'10" WEST, 170.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4518'45" WEST, 42.97 FEET; TO A POINT SITUATE 40.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1'03'20" WEST, 226.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEG!NNwG . AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO YAKIMA COUNTY, FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S FILE NO.'S 131530, 3038876 AND 3038877. RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 is ITV OF YAKIM • r.nurin PLANNING DIV. -DOC, INDEX PARCEL . /8132 -- 4/3011 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 124.62 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST,W.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1'03120" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, 124.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8914'10" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 40.01 FEET, TO THE EAST UNE OF THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO YAKIMA COUNTY FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1315320 AND 3038876, AND THE TRUE POINT TO BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'34'10" EAST, 360.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1'03'20" EAST, 99.61 FEET, TO A POINT SITUATE 25.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89'34'10" WEST, PARALLEL TO SAID SOUTH UNE, 159.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0'25'50" EAST, 5.00 FET; THENCE NORTH 8914'10" WEST, 1.70.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4518'45" WEST, 42.97 FEET; TO A POINT SITUATE 40.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1'03'20" WEST, 226.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1� r RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 , CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. DOC INDEX FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER G Notices EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE G-1 Posting of Property Certification 5/20/05 G-2 Determination of Completeness 5/23/05 G-3 Notice of Public Hearing And Preliminary SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 6/16/05 G-4 500 Foot Radius Adjoining Property Owners Notified 6/16/05 G-5 SEPA Agencies Notified 6/16/05 G-6 Affidavit of Mailing 6/16/05 G-7 Legal Notice —Notice of Application and Public Hearing 6/16/05 G-8 Press Release — Notice of Application and Public Hearing 6/16/05 G-9 Notice of Decision — Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance 7/8/05 G-10 500 Foot Radius Adjoining Property Owners Notified 7/8/05 G-11 SEPA Agencies Notified 7/8/05 G-12 Affidavit of Mailing 7/8/05 G-13 Hearing Examiner Agenda 8/11/05 G-14 Notice of Continuation of Public Hearing 8/18/05 G-15 500 -foot radius adjoining property owners notified 8/18/05 G-16 SEPA Agencies Notified 8/18/05 G-17 Affidavit of Mailing 8/18/05 G-18 Legal Notice of Continuation of Public Hearing 8/18/05 G-19 Continued Public Hearing Agenda 9/8/05 G-20 Hearing Sign -In Sheet 9/8/05 G-21 Notification of Hearing Examiner's recommendation to the Yakima City Council 9126/05 t,; lir-Zr Parties of Record Notified 9/26/x5 G-23 Affidavit of Mailing 9/26/05 STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: Prel Long Plat#3-05, UAZO CL(2)#9-05 & UAZO ADM ADJ#8-05 Frank Baehm / Pete Olson Vicinity of 1419 S. 72nd Ave. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of the Hearing Examiners recommendation to the Yakima City Council. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all parties of record which are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 26th day of September , 2005. That I mailed said notices in the manner 'herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. �ifilr/.c2�`� • Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist -DOC. INDEX # ��'� Baehm / Olson - Prel Long Plat #3-05 Hearing Examiner Par,.es of Record First RTA„1P First Na e ' T t Name Last Name Organization Address ".-,_ City, State, Zip Michael L. 1A40 S. 68th Avc. _ Yakima, WA 9987,. The Irwins 1529 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 - Frank Baehm 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Iry & Nancy Benson _ 1441 S. 68th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Vivian Carl / /a 5/ 1428-S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Gwen Clear Dept. of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St 20( Yakima, WA 98902 John & Nancy Durham 1522 S. 67th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Jeff & Linda Henjum 1441 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Bill Hordan Hordan Planning Services 410 N. 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Teresa Ishijaka /7'Z' 1421S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Bill Kloster 760 Riverview Dr. Yakima, WA 98901 Sharon Madson 1522 S. 68th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Pete Olson P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Alisa Oram 1522 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Les Ornelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St. Suite 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mildred B. Pursley 1429 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Carol Richards 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Roger & Laura Ridd 1526 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Toby & Geri Sali 1505 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Brad & Terri Trisler 1521 S. 69th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 1 Sarah L. Wixson Velikanje, Moore & Shore P.O. BOX LGOJU Yakima, WA 98907 DOC, INDEX DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEL, MENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager • www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO THE YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL On September 22, 2005 the Yakima Hearing Examiner rendered his recommendation on a Preliminary Long Plat, Class (2) and Administrative Adjustment Applications submitted by Pete Olson on behalf of property owner Frank Baehm. The proposed subdivision to be known as "Hedgewood" is located in the vicinity of 1419 S. 72nd Avenue, Yakima, Washington. The application was reviewed at a public hearing held by the Hearing Examiner on September 8, 2005. A copy of the Hearing Examiner's Findings and Recommendation is enclosed. The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation will be considered by the Yakima City Council in a Public Hearing to be scheduled. The City Clerk will notify you of the date, time and place of the public hearing. For further information or assistance you may contact Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner, City of Yakima Planning Division located on the 2nd floor of Yakima City Hall, (129 North Second Street), 575-6163. C Doug Maples Planning and Code Administration Manager Date of mailing: September 26, 2005 Enclosures: Hearing Examiner's Recommendation Preliminary Plat and Vicinity Map Yakima DOC.d INDEX 11111 v �( 1994 CASE # HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET CITY OF YA1A FEARING EXAMINER YAK MA UITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS !HEARING DATE: September 8, 2005 APPLICANT: PREL LONG PLAT#3-05 Frank Baehm EC#19-05, UAZO CL(2)#9-05 and UAZO ADM ADJ#8-05 NA1ME: ''L1--- •sKJ SITE ADDRESS: 1419 South 72nd Ave PLEASE PRINT \\ Plus TIvIu1qr2-11t1 . O41''AvY< 7 Kiwi- 9 nCq(�r, 'ibS . �.iv►roLfr-N /4/ 5`_ ADDRESS: ZIP: 2-A (ST `Mk1/144 ?9 f ?73 B°(Cortfil �Lyu� �i gab f' 1 66 T-1' /1P' %c)idt/ Ri>S /14/ -caY o. S 1- i 11 IQ. 5+ ja) d /57)S -T kl MA - Aloe DOC, INDEX CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA Thursday, September 8, 2005 Yakima City Hall 9:00 am Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTION III. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM AUGUST 11, 2005 FRANK BAEHM Planner Assigned: Jeff Peters File Number: PREL LONG PLAT#3-05 EC#19-05 UAZO CL(2)#9-05 & UAZO ADM ADJ#8-05 Location: 1419 South 72nd Ave Request: 28 lot preliminary subdivision, CL(2) review to allow duplexes in the R-1 zone and administrative adjustment to the lot coverage standard. IV. ADJOURNMENT If you are unable to attend the hearing, you may submit your comments in writing prior to the hearing. You may also submit written testimony at the hearing. DOC INDEX # 6:15- LEGAL NOTICE Continuation of Public Hearing On August 11, 2005 an opened record public hearing was scheduled before the City of Yakima's Hearing Examiner Pro Tem to consider an application signed and submitted by Franck Baehm (property owner) and Pete Olson (developer). This application involves a 28 -Lot Subdivision in the vicinity of S. 72nd and Mead Avenue coupled with a Class (2) Review for duplex / common wall const action and an Administrative Adjustment of the lot coverage standards to the Single -Family Zoning District. Prior to this scheduled public hearing the property owner withdrew his consent to process the application thereby rendering the application incomplete and unable to be further processed by the City of Yakima Planning Department. The City of Yakima's Hearing Examiner Pro Tem apprised of the current situation determined that the appropriate action to take would be to open the public hearing for the purpose of continuing the public hearing until September 8, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. Project Description: This master application concerns a proposal, to subdivide approximately 5.94 acres of property into twenty-eight new lots that range in size from approximately 5,000 to 34,394 square feet. This proposal also includes a Class (2) Review for common wall Single -Family Construction on all lots with the exception of Lots #6,7 and 24. These previously mentioned lots with the exception of Lot #7 are also to be reviewed under the Class (2) Review and Administrative Adjustment processes as two duplexes are proposed on these lots, which require an adjustment of the lot coverage standard by 10% increasing the standard to 55%. Project Location: 1419 South 72nd Ave, Yakima, WA 98908 File Number: Pre Plat #3-05, CL(2) #9-05. ADM ADJ #8-05 Bz EC #19-05 Project Applicant: Frank Baehm / Pete Olson 419 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Notice of Public Hearing: This request requires that the City of Yakima hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been continued until September 8, 2005. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e-mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE ONLY ON THURSDAY, AUG. 18, 2005 Send Invoice and Affidavit of Publication to: Account No. 11002 City of Yakima, Planning Division 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 'DOC. INDEX # G AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA Re: Frank Baehm / Pete Olson PREL PLAT#3-05, CL(2)#9-05, ADM ADJ#8-05 & EC#19-5 1419 S. 72nd Ave. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Continuation of Public Hearing by the Yakima City Hearing Examiner. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the applicant, interested parties, agencies and all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property. That said parties are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 18th day of August 2005. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. attA;.4.77.-,:t)/14, C‘,43L_____ Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist DOC. INDEX IL.6..:12___ SPA- 40eri6jes Army Corps P.O. Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Sheila Ross rpenarla Nntnral ('tae 701 S. 1" Ave �LL vN� Yakima, WA 98902 Chamber of Commerce 10 N 9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Kathleen Holscher, City Mgr. City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Ornelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly Dept. of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adm Bldg. Mail Stop AX -41 Olympia, WA 98504 Gwen Clear Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 20n Yalcima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WA State Emergency Mgmt. Div. Mitigation, Analysis & Planning Supervisor Building 20 Camp Murray, WA 98430-5122 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Mr. Paul Donahue Tler,t of .Ct,r/TTeplth Cer.riCe Capital Programs Ofc. Bldg#2, MS OB -23B Olympia, WA 98504 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W. 4t Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation Planning Engineer 2809 Ruclkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, YVA 98903 Nob Hill Water Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 N. Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 Dept. of CTED Growth Management Services P.O. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 TJ'Iu`la'ft/ ,"r -. V7 tan 4in/14a ��®z-i If V e�64/1 , en. . V Mr. Greg Griffith a Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 WA State Attorney Gen. Office ion .c'11.4.ct#inn Yakima, WA 98101 Mr. .'chard S Terrace 314 N Yaerma, W 98901 th is Sewer Dist Blake Davis Q- West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima Co. Commissioners 128 North 2` Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 1014 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Steven Erickson Yakima Co Planning 198 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Redifer Yakima Co Pub. Services 128 N 2nd St., 4'h Floor Y ima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Bailey Yaldma Cnty Dev. Serv. Ctr. 128 N. 2n' St. 4h1 Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Philip Rigdon Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA,:98948, li'4Uc X # �`/( Transportation Planner ' VCOG 2nd St. Suite 605 _ .Ltcnna, WA 98901 Mr. Doug Mayo Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Coordinator Bureau of Indian Affairs PO Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Yakama Tribal Council PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Soil Conservation Dist Attn: Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St Suite F 'rima, WA 98902 Eric Barstrand Dept. of Fisheries 1701 So. 2e Ave. Yakima, Wa 98902 Mr. Scott Nicolai Yakama Indian Nation -Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 Mr. Bill Beckley Yakama Indian Nation Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Federal Aviation Administration Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055-4056 WSDOT Aviation Division John Shambaugh 3704172'd St. N.E. Suite K-12 Arlington, WA 98223 Mr. Marty Miller Office of Farmworker Housing 1400 Snmrnitview #203 Yakima, WA 98902 Donna J. Bunten Critical Areas Coordinator D.O.E., Shorelands & Environ. Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Martin Humphries Yakima Valley Museum 2105 Tieton Dr. Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Buck Taylor, Manager Yakima Airport 2400 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 S. 18th St. Yakima, WA 98901 ALWAYS SEND TO APPLICANT 181332-21470 THOMAS E & STEPHANIE L WARD 1515 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34412 NEST VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 8310 3NION GAP, WA 98903 181329-34404 fAKIMA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT LOGO AHTANUM RD INION GAP, WA 98903 1813332-21432 TODD M ALLAN PO BOX 516 NACRES, WA 98937-0516 1 29-34413 WES ALLEY P ERTIES L PO BO 10.. YAKIMA, WA 8908-8310 181332-12521. YUKIKO MORI 1546 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 L40 1A1-1 1 e r,r„•.te,a for map sheet ingpit-3-05 X9,7 Mr. Pete Olson P.O. Box 8021 Vu1` W1A 9918908 chez , , ()i4hkrsJj Cindy Noble NFRD 5609 W. Arlington Yakima, W.A. 98908 /21;21 arMetad J . ehgAr 181332-21433 TRISHA WILLIAMS 1513 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18 29-34414 WEST LEY PR5PERTIES PO BOX ti 3” .bl.,.,/ UNION GAP, WA 98903 John & Nancy Durham 1522 S. 67th Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Ns -DOC, INDEX # <,- 181329-43419 kLEJO & VERONICA NARANJO JR L425 S 69TH AVE CAK''-'‘, WA 98908 181329-43406 3EATRICE M SCOTT 1.436 S 69TH AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12511 3RADFORD J & SUSAN L MC MILLAN 1831 W KING ST 'AKIMA, WA 98908 .81332-12510 3RIAN J & JILL M DAVISON .521 S. 68TH AVE FAKKIMA, WA 98908-5600 .81329-43433 RYAN E & TYRAN E H MAINS .429 S 68TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 81�__-12412 '.HARLES W & MICHELLE J CARLSON '003 SCOTT CT 'AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12416 `.HRISTOPHER LEONARD 508 S 70TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43425 'RAIG M & CHRISTINA WARNER 428 8 68TH AVE "AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21466 JAVID & GALE J AVILA 506 S 73RD AVE "AKIMA, WA 98908 813"-43463 EP ELMA THOMPSON 1C .EGORY PL AK]•n, WA 98908-5729 81332-12415 ON E JONES 004 SCOTT CT 181332-12472 ANDREW R & DONNA M BLACK 1534 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12528 BESSIE V PICKENS 1517 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12476 BRADLEY E & TERRI A TRISLER 1521 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-21481 BRIAN S & VERONICA L MAZIE 1506 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21476 C CARL & DONNA MAZIE 1503 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12426 CHERYL A WALKER 1606 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21473 CLARENCE 0 ZELLNER 1509 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34007 DALE B & RHEA MURPHY 1308 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1916 181332-21472 DAVID A & VIRGINIA R SHUEL 8210 OCCIDENTAL AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98903 181332-21484 DENNIS BRIAN JONES 1512 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1955 181329-43428 DONALD & SHERRY DONOVAN 6831 LOGAN AVE 181332-12414 BARRY J ETUX ROSS 7006 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21434 BILLY J & SUSAN L TERRY 1511 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12422 BRENDA E UNDERWOOD 7006 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2042 181332-12465 BRYAN C & LISA MARTIN 1546 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43423 CHAN I & YONG S CHONG 1436 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12417 CHRISTINE L WILSON 7003 KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12459 CRAIG J & SHERRY DAVENPORT 1601 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12012 DANIEL N & SHARON C JOHNSON 1603 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1962 181332-12477 DAVID C & SAUNDRA L ALLEN TRU; 1525 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43426 DENNIS M & JERRIANNE SILLERY PO BOX 11106 YAKIMA, WA 98901500, INDEX. , 181329-43427 ---«•- DOU S & HYUNG S LEE 1 aon e come TtTt 81329-43414 )OUGLAS C & LINDA M STOLZ 420 5 69TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43422 SWAIN C & MARY ANN SCHRANK 440 S 68TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA QRgnR 81332-12445 NA M ET AL LUST 603 S 70TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908-2003 f 181329-43014 DOUGLAS H LEMON 1317 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1917 181332-12516 EDWARD B & CHRISTINE L MILES 1526 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43417 FRANCIS D & DARLENE A SMITH 6833 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12003 18'329-43 RANK BAEHM FRA 419 S 72ND AVE 1419 2ND AVE --/ AKIMA, WA 98908-1958 YAKIMA, WA 98908-1958 81332-12468 RED JR & BARBARA LIEBERT 537 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21439 ARY L & CAROLYN L BELLES 501, VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908-1956 329-43472 AR L & CINDY FISH 515 ' sDOW LN AKIMA, :-08 81332-12519 REGORY J & JULI N KNOEBEL 501 MEADOW LANE CT AKIMA, WA 98908-3692 81329-43436 RVING D & NANCY D BENSON 441 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12409 AMES K & MARI R MC KELLAR 507 S 70TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12458 GAGOUSH JAMES & TAMYRA 1600 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5507 181329-43471 GARY L K. CINDY FISHER 6902 WILLOW PLACE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43432 GERALD L & NORMA L HILL 1425 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21478 HELEN H WENDT 1 712 GHORMLEY RD YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21483 JAMES G & DENISE A HELMS 7709 LOREN PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43467 JAMES 0 & JEANNE LOWELL 11303 NE 60TH ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 81332-21474 181332-12423 AMPP. xl 181332-21475 DOUGLAS P & NANCY J ^ROT iK 1505 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12447 EDWARD G OLSON 1507 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12407 FRANK & TAMARA GODINA PO BOX 163 BUENA, WA 98921-0163 181329-43418 FRANKLIN I & BECKY E SCOTT 1421 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181329-43434 GARY F & LORENE L M PERO 1433 S GBTH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 181329-43466 GARY L & CINDY L FISHER 7515 MEADOW LN YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12004 GERALDINE SALI 1505 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 Tn- 181332-12473 HOWARD & BEVERLY DARROW 1530 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43411 JAMES K & DIANE L THOMAS 1432 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43465 JAMES R & SUSAN RICHMOND 7102 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98902 INDLX .. •LX /T 181332-p12d62 .81332-21486 TEFFERY BOONE _600 VALLEY WEST AVE TAKIMA, WA 98908-1965 .81332-12512 FOHN A & ELSA J RIGGIN .542 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 .81332-12518 TONATHAN L & KAREN R DE VANEY .529 S 68TH AVE .'AKIMA, WA 98908 ,81332-21435 TOSEPH N. & KYUNG BENSCH 509 VALLEY WEST AVE .'AKIMA, WA 98908 .81332-12479 :ELLEY WIES 533 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 8, -21477 :EVi,v J & DEBRA CRAWFORD 510 S 73RD AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43415 LAWRENCE B & LINDA K SULLIVAN .921 W LOGAN AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908-5512 81332-21431 LEON D & DELANE R MILLER 603 VALLEY WEST AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43408 JEFFREY J & LINDA LARKIN HENJU1 1441 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12464 JOHN W DISTLER 1550 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12419 JOSEPH K & BARBARA K HUSTON 7007 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2043 181329-43412 KARL & TERESA ISHIZAKA 1428 S 69TH AVE ' YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12509 KELLY D & SHARON LEE MADSON 1522 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12413 KIM & KERRY NEWMAN 7007 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181329-43421 LAWRENCE B & SHAR L FAIN 1433 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21437 LEZLIE A REALER 1505 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 81332-12522 181332-12471 LORNE J & MARGARET L HOUSE LOWELL KENNETH BISCHOFF 821 W KING ST 1549 S 69TH AVE AKININT "WA -9.8 9i'T8 - -r _ YAKI1 .- WA 98'908-- 81332-21463 181329-43405 MI --"'T HARRIS JR MICHAEL A & CAROL E LAMBERT 3 MEAD AVE 1440 S 69TH AVE A., ., WA 98908-1853 YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21464 ICHAEL J & KINDRA J ZITO 502 S 73RD AVE AKTMA WA QRQfl 181329-43416 MICHAEL R & ANNETTE LAFLEUR 6917 W LOGAN AVE t 'TART WT nonno CC'1 it • ri. I e i 181332-12448 JOAN V ARNOLD 1515 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43407 JON E & KELLY J CASEBEER 1437 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12418 JOSEPH M & FRANCES GLENN 7005 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12514 KEITH & JULIE MEADOWCROFT 1534 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18133.2-12498 KENNETH R & CLEONE L BERRY RE 1602 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12515 KIM FILINGERI 1530 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 161329-34410 LDS CHURCH OF JESUS CHRI 50 E NORTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84150 181332-21438 LISA LLAMAS 1503 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12446 MARION J & JOYCE E BLANK 1601 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 3890B- --- 181332-21436 MICHAEL H & MELISSA N ROSENCI 1507 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 181332-12425 MICHAEL S KENNEDY j 1602 S 70TH AVE 81332-21479 IKAL HEINTZ 502 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21471 ANCY A NYBERG 513 5 73RD AVE AKIMA, WA 98908-1918 81332-124660 ATRICK J & JANICE ARENS 604 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43470 ALPH D & JUDITH E GILMAN 0 BOX 272 APLE VALLEY, WA 98038 81332-21480 AYMOND I & SYLVIA P SANCHEZ 504 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 181329-4342n MILDRED B PURSLEY 1429 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12013 NOB HILL WATER ASSOC 6111 TIETON DR YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43412 MONTY L & VIVIAN G CARL 1424 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5510 181332-12513 OLIVIA WEITZ 1538 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43468 181329-43469 PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE; PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE PO BOX 12 PO BOX 12 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 rst- 181332-21465 RANDY & BROOKLYN TURNER 1504 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 9890B 181332-12529 RENN D ABRAMS 7101 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21482 181329-43462 ICHARD R & MICHELLE CARMICHAEL RICK & PENNY GEBHARD 508 VALLEY WEST AVE 7104 GREGORY PL AKIMA, WA YAKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12475 ICK W & ALISA J ORAM 522 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12463 OBERT S & KASANDRA A BAILEY 609 S 69TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-12469 ONALD W & GERI L JENNINGS 541 S 69TH AVE AKTMA '-'WA_ -9-8-9 08 181332-12520 ROBERT & CARLA WEEDIN 1537 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12474 ROGER L & LAURA RIDD 11526 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12411 RUBEN PADILLA 7001 SCOTT COURT YAKIN _ WA.._9. 0.8,_--_ 81332-12421 181329-43424 ANDRA M & BRIAN D ROBILLARD-TEE SEAN J & RITA M GASSELING 100 W KING ST 1432 S 68TH AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 81332-12408 181329-43435 TEPHEN & MARIA SOM TERRY D & CYNTHIA L WRIGHT 509 S 70TH AVE 1437 8 68TH AVE 181332-12470 RAY A & LINDA L FLEMING 1545 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-12517 RHODA ENSIGN 1525 8 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12410 RICK C & LIA VANINA FOLKMAN 1505 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12467 ROBERT E & PATRICIA SULLIVAN 1538 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21485 ROMAN & ALMA ROMERO OROZCO 1514 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12424 SAMUEL G & SHANNON L SUTHERLA 7002 W KING 181332-12466 SOMJAI BURTON 1542 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5506 ff 181332-12478 TERRY P & ELIZABETH R IRWIN 1529 5 69TH AVE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager • www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 Notice of Continuation of Public Hearing August 18, 2005 On August 11, 2005 an opened record public hearing was scheduled before the City of Yakima' s Hearing Examiner Pro Tem to consider an application signed and submitted by Frank Baehm (property owner) and Pete Olson (developer). This application involves a 28 -Lot Subdivision in the vicinity of S. 72nd and Mead Avenue coupled with a Class (2) Review for duplex / common wall construction and an Administrative Adjustment of the lot coverage standards to the Single -Family Zoning District. Prior to this scheduled public hearing the property owner withdrew his consent to process the application thereby rendering the application incomplete and unable to be further processed by the City of Yakima Planning Department. The City of Yakima's Hearing Examiner Pro Tem apprised of the current situation determined that the appropriate action to take would be to open thepublic hearing for the purpose of continuing the public until September 8, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. Project Description: This master application concerns a proposal, to subdivide approximately 5.94 acres of property into twenty-eight new lots that range in size from approximately 5,000 to 34,394 square feet. This proposal also includes a Class (2) Review for common wall Single -Family Construction on all lots with the exception of Lots #6,7 and 24. These previously mentioned lots with the exception of Lot #7 are also to be reviewed under the Class (2) Review and Administrative Adjustment processes as two duplexes are proposed on these lots, which require an adjustment of the lot coverage standard by 10% increasing the standard to 55%. Project Location: 1419 South 72nd Ave, Yakima, WA 98908 File Number: Pre Plat #3-05, CL(2) #9-05, ADM ADJ #8-05 & EC #19-05 Project Applicant: Frank Baehm / Pete Olson 419 S. 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Notice of Public Hearing: This request requires that the City of Yakima hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been continued until September 8, 2005. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e-mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. DOC, INDEX Yakima AFlmorlaCity 11111! 1994 CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA Thursday, August 11, 2005 Yakima City Hall 9:00 am Council Chambers I. CALL TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTION III. PUBLIC HEARING FR�ANK BAEHM Planner Assigned: Jeff Peters File Number: PREL LONG PLAT#3-05 EC#19-05 UAZO CL(2)#9-05 & UAZO ADM ADJ#8-05 Location: 1419 South 72nd Ave Request: 28 lot preliminary subdivision, CL(2) review to allow duplexes in the R-1 zone and administrative adjustment to the lot coverage standard. IV. ADJOURNMENT If you are unable to attend the hearing, you may submit your comments in writing prior to the hearing. You may also submit written testimony at the hearing. Filed Hearing Examiner EXH #Date 11 65 File # �re. tR-,..S iDQC> INDEX STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SEPA NOTICE Re: Prel Lon Plat#3-05 L 2 #9-05 Adm Ad48-05 & EC#19 05 Pete Olson for Frank Baehm I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a SEPA Notice of Decision, Compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith. That said notice was addressed to all public and private agencies and interested parties, all of which are individually listed on the mailing lists retained by the Planning Division. That said notices were mailed by me on the 8th day of Jul_R_v ___200 That 1 mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist Filed Hearing Examiner Ex'sLGDate -7/0 J6�, File # Pre.P4421-143 - DS- � v v t1 YMATS Planner Y V C:OG 6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 Yalima_ WA 98901 Mr. Doug Mayo Wastewater Treatment Plant Bureau of Indian Affairs PO Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chrm Yakama Tribal Council PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Soil. Conservation Dist Attn: Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St Suite F Yakima, WA 98902 Eric Barstrand Dept. of Fisheries 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yaks Wa 98902 ivar. Scott 1Vicolai Yakama Indian Nation -Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yaici.ma School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 Mr. Hiram Olney Yakama Indian Nation P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 too e les Mr. Bill Beckley Yakama Indian Nation Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Federal Aviation Administration Cayla Morgan. Airport Planner Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055-4056 WSDOT Aviation Division John Shambaugh 3704172nd St. N.E. Suite K-12 Arlington, WA 98223 Mr. Marty Miller Office of Farmworker Housing 1400 Snmmitview #203 Yakima, WA 98902 Donna J. Bunten Critical Areas Coordinator D.O.E., Shorelands & Environ. Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Martin Humphries Yakima Valley Museum 2105 Tieton D. Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Buck Taylor, Manager Yakima Airport 2400 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 S. 18th St, Yakima, WA 98901 ALWAYS SEND TO APPLICANT DOC. INDEX ��l I Army Corps P.O. Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Sheila Ross Cascade Natural Gas 701 S. 1" Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Chamber of Commerce 10N9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Kathleen Holscher, City Mgr. City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Ornelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Tr. John Daly ept. of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adm Bldg. Mail Stop AX -41 Olympia, WA 98504 Gwen Clear Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Dept of Emergency Services 4220 E Martin Way Olympia, WA 98504 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife '01 So. 24th Ave. kima, WA 98902 Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W. 4th Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation Planning Engineer 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, WA 98903 Interagency Committee Outdoor Recreation P.O. Box 40917 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 Nob Hill Water Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 N. Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 Dept of Community, Trade & Econ. Dev.- Growth Mgmt P O Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 Mr. Greg Griffith Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 WA State Attorney Gen. Office 120 S 3rd St #100 Yakima, WA 98101 Mr. Richard Smith Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 314N2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Blake Davis Q- West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima Co. Commissioners 128 North 2" Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Steven Erickson Yakima Co Planning 128 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Redifer Yakima Co Pub. Services 128 N 2nd St., 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Bailey Yakima Cnty Dev. Serv, Ctr. 128 N. tad St. 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Philip Rigdon Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish,.A, 98948 INDEX 1332-21470 NOMAS E & STEPHANIE L WARD 515 S 73RD AVE_ UKIMA, WA 98908 31329-34412 QST VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC BOX 8310 TION GAP, WA 98903 1329-34404 .KIMA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 00 AHTANUM RD 'ION GAP, WA 98903 0 labels printed for map sheet 3i 0(Saa I go 42 13 )EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Manning Division 29 North Second Street 'akima, WA 98901 181332-21432 TODD M ALLAN PO BOX 516 NACHES, WA 98937-0516 181 29-344 WES VALL PO OX 8 YAKI Y P"OPERT S LC 10 WA 9890:-8310 181332-12521 YUKIKO MORI 1546 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 ingplt-3-05 J34 Lit - lova DAS Pete Olson P O Box 8021 Yakima, NA. 08908 O Ari L.A2744 181.332-21433 TRISHA WILLIAMS 1513 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 187: 293441 WES VALLE PR►PERTIr= LC PO B X 83.0 tJ I0 G err, WA CindyNoble NERD 5609 W. Arlington Ave Yakima, WA. 98908 "DOC- INDEX DOC.INDE 0 181332-21479 MIKAL HEINTZ 1502 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 L' 2-21471 1 • CY NYB L5i 3 S 73R % A EA MA, 9890:-1918 L81332-12460 ?ATRICK J & JANICE ARENS L604 S 69TH AVE rAKIMA, WA 98908 81329-43470 :ALPH D & JUDITH E GILMAN 'O BOX 272 LAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 81332-21480 AYMOND I & SYLVIA P SANCHEZ 504 VALLEY WEST AVE AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21482 I� ? R & MICHELLE CARMICHAEL 5( ;LLEY WEST AVE WA 98908 81332-12475 ICK W & ALISA J GRAM 322 S 69TH AVE kKIMA, WA 98908 31332-12463 )BERT S & KASANDRA A BAILEY ;09 S 69TH AVE XKIMA, WA 98908 1332-12469 INALD W & GERI L JENNINGS 41 S 69TH AVE 1332-12421 NDRA M & BRIAN D ROBILLARD-TEE 00 W KING ST KIM" WA 98908 1332-12408 EPHEN & MARIA SOM 09 S 70TH AVE {IMA, WA 98908 181329-43420 MILDRED B PURSLEY 1429 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12013 NOB HILL WATER ASSOC 6111 TIETON DR •YAKIMA, WA 98908 r 181329-43468 PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE PO BOX 12 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 181332-21465 RANDY & BROOKLYN TURNER 1504 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12529 RENN D ABRAMS 7101 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43462 RICK & PENNY GEBHARD 7104 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12520 ROBERT & CARLA WEEDIN 1537 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12474 ROGER L & LAURA RIDD 1526 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12411 RUBEN PADILLA 7001 SCOTT COURT YAKIMA-TVA-979:01T 181329-43424 SEAN J & RITA M GASSELING 1432 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 181329-43435 TERRY D & CYNTHIA L WRIGHT 143'7 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18.1329-43413 MONTY L & VIVIAN G CARL 1424 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5510 181332'-12513 OLIVIA WEITZ 1538 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12470 RAY A & LINDA L FLEMING 1545 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-12517 RHODA ENSIGN 1525 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12410 RICK C & LIA VANINA FOLKMAN 1505 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12467 ROBERT E & PATRICIA SULLIVAN 1538 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21485 ROMAN & ALMA ROMERO OROZCO 1514 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12424 SAMUEL G & SHANNON L SUTHERL) 7002 W KING YAKIMA; .-WA_.g8?3U'8----------- 181332-12466 SOMJAI BURTON 1542 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA.98908 e5 0'6 04 181332-12478 -_ TERRY P & ELIZABETH R 1529 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 IRWIN 181332-21486 JEFFERY BOONE 1600 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1965 181332-12512 JOHN A & ELSA J RIGGIN 1542 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12518 JONATHAN L & KAREN R DE VANEY 1529 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21435 JOSEPH N. & KYUNG BENSCH 1509 VALLEY WEST CAKIMA, WA 98908 AVE -81332-12479 CELLEY WIES -533 S 69TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA. 98908 .81332-21477 :EVIN DEB 510 7 •D E W 8908 CRAWFORD 81329-43415 AWRENCE B & LINDA K STJLLTVAN 921 W LOGAN AVE "`� AKIMA, WA 98908-5512 81332-21431 EON D & DELANE R MILLER_' 603 VALLEY WEST AVE .KIMA, WA 98908 31332-12522 )RNE J & MARGARET L HOUSE 321 W KING ST kKIMA; `w 9-8 9II 8 - 11332-21463 :LVIN HARRIS JR 100 W MEAD AVE XKIMA, WA 98908-1853 1332-21464 CHAEL J & KINDRA J ZITO 02 S 73RD AVE KIMA, WA 98908 181329-43408 JEFFREY J & LINDA LARKIN HENJUM 1441 8. 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12464 JOHN W DISTLER 1550 S 69TH AVE .YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12419 JOSEPH K & BARBARA K HUSTON 7007 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2043 181329-43412 KARL &. TERESA S r dr �s��r SHIZAKA 1428 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12509 KELLY D & SHARON LEE MADSON 1522 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12413 KIM & KERRY NEWMAN 7007 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181329-43421 LAWRENCE B & SHAR L FAIN 1433 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21437 LEZLIE A REALER 1505 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 1813.32-12471 LOWELL KENNETH BISCHOFF 1549 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA;-WA 78-908"- _- - - 181329-43405 MICHAEL A & CAROL E LAMBERT 1440 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43416 MICHAEL R & ANNETTE LAFLEUR 6917 W LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5512 181332-12448 JOAN V ARNOLD 1515 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43407 JON E & KELLY J CASEBEER 1437 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 989.08 181332-12418 JOSEPH M & FRANCES GLENN 7005 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12514 KEITH & JULIE MEADOWCROFT 1534 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 "1"."-12498 KENNETH R & CLEONE L BERRY R 1602 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12515 KIM FILINGERI 1530 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34410 LDS CHURCH OF JESUS CHRI 50 E NORTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 8 415 0 t 1.81332-21438 LISA LLAMAS 1503 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12446 MARION J & JOYCE E BLANK 1601 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 181332-21436 MICHAEL H & MELISSA N 1507 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 9890851956 iNuimA ROSENC 181332-12425 MICHAEL S KENNEDY 1602 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2002 181329-43414 DOUGLAS C &'LINDA M STOLZ 1420 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18 -43422 DWAiN C & MARY ANN SCHRANK 1440 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12445 EVA M ET AL LUST 1603 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2003 L81332-12003 'RANK BAEHM L419 S 72ND AVE (AKIMA, WA 98908-1958 .81332-12468 FRED JR & BARBARA LIEBERT .537 S 69TH AVE .'AKIMA, WA 98908 81332-21439 & CAROLYN L BELLES 50 LLEY WEST AVE AKS , WA 98908-1956 81329-43472 ARY L & CINDY L FISHER 515 MEADOW LN AKIMA, WA 98908 r B1332 519 REGO-s & JUL N 01 MEADoW LA CT K'MA, WA •:•08-369 R r 1� OEBEL 31329-43436 2VING D & NANCY D BENSON 641 S 68TH AVE LKIMA, WA 98908 1332-12409 ,MES IE & MARI R MC KELLAR 07 S 70TH AVE .KIMA. WA 98908 1332-21474 MES R. & MARILYN LANE 9 CONESTOGA BLVD KIMA, WA 98908-2420 181329-43014 DOUGLAS H LEMON 1317 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1917 181332-12516 EDWARD B & CHRISTINE L MILES 1526 S 68TH AVE .YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43417 FRANCIS D & DARLENE A SMITH 6833 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1^81329 011 FHtAN BA N 1419 S 72 E YA. MA, WA 98908-1958 181332-12458 GAGOUSH JAMES & TAMYRA 1600 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5507 181329-43471 ARY CIND 902 IL OW LAC 98908 ISHER 181329-43432 GERALD L & NORMA L HILL 1425 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21478 HELEN H WENDT 712 GHORMLEY RD YAKIMA, WA 98908 J 7 YA 81332-214 ES G 09 LO DE SE A H N PL WA 9890 181329-43467 JAMES 0 & JEANNE LOWELL 11303 NE 60TH ST KIRKLAND, WA 98033 181332-12423 JASON R & LAURA D SCHILLING 7004 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21475 DOUGLAS P & NANCY J GROENIG 1505 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12447 EDWARD G OLSON 1507 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 07 TAMARA 163 WA ':•21-0 63 181329-43418 FRANKLIN I & BECKY E SCOTT 1421 S 69TH AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181329-43434 GARY F & LORENE L M PERO 1433 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98.908-2197 AR. & • DY L SOW LN YAKIMA, WA 9=••8 181332-12004 GERALDINE SALI 1505 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12473 HOWARD & BEVERLY DARROW 1530 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43411 JAMES K & DIANE L THOL"IAS 1432 S 69TH AVE 'YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43465 JAMES R & SUSAN RICHMOND 7102 GREGORY PL DOC YAKIMA, WA 98908INDEX 181332-12462 JAY M & JACKIE C WEESI✓ 1606 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43419 ALEJO & VERONICA NARANJO JR '1425 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43406 BEATRICE M SCOTT 1436 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12511 BRADFORD J & SUSAN L MC MILLAN 6831 W KT -NG ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12510 BRIAN J & JILL M DAVISON 1521 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5600 181329-43433 BRYAN E & TYRAN E H MAINS 1429 S 668TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12412 CHARLES W & MICHELLE J CARLSON 7003 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12416 CHRISTOPHER LEONARD 1508 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12472 ANDREW R & DONNA M BLACK 1534 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12528 BESSIE V PICKENS 1517 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12476 BRADLEY E & TERRI A TRISLER 1521 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-21481 BRIAN S & VERONICA L MAZIE 1506 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21476 C CARL & DONNA MAZE. 1503 S 73RD AVE --- YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12426 CHERYL A WALKER 1606 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21473 CLARENCE 0 7F.TLT,NEP 1509 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12414 BARRY J ETUX ROSS 7006 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21434 BILLY J & SUSAN L TERRY 1511 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12422 BRENDA E UNDERWOOD 7006 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2042 181332-12465 BRYAN C & LISA MARTIN 1546 S 69TH AVE 1 YAKIMA, WA 98908 r- 181329-43423 CHAN I & YONG S CHONG 1436 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12417 CHRISTINE L WILSON 7003 KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12459 CRAIG J & SHERRY DAVENPORT 1601 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43425 181329-34007 181332-12012 CRAIG M & CHRISTINA WARNER DALE B & RHEA MURPHY DANIEL N & SHARON C JOHNSOI 1428 S 68TH AVE 1308 S 72ND AVE 1603 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 I YAKIMA, WA 98908-1916 YAKIMA, WA 98908-1962 181332-21466 181332-21472 DAVID &GALE J AVILA i8i332-12%47 7 D5I SVID A & VIRGINIA R SHUEL DAVID C & SAUNDRA L ALLEN 15073 L YAKIMA, WA 98 AVEAJE E 8210 OCCIDENTAL AVE, 1525 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98903 YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43463 DEAN & ELMA THOMPSON 7106 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908-5729 181332-12415 DON E JONES 7004 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21484 DENNIS BRIAN JONES 1512 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1955 181329-43428 DONALD & SHERRY DONOVAN 6831 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43426 DENNIS M & JERRIANNE PO BOX 11106 YAKIMA, WA 9890 a IN0E; # G--/0 181329-43427 DOU S & HYUNG S LEE 1420 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 SILLEI DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager • www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (S09) 575-6105 Compliance with the WashingtonStateStaDEnC DECISION Policy July 8, 2005 Act (SEPA) On June 16, 2005 the City of Yam Washington issued a Notice of Application Environmental Review and Preliminary SEPA Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Environmental Checklist application submitted by Pete Olson on behalf of Frank Baehm. This review concerns the environmental analysis of the Preliminary ly acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for divisionLong Plat ofrinoto 28 tlots, 5.17 which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes located at 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Parcel Numbers: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 City File Number: EC# 19-05 Following the required 20 -day public comment period, and consideration of all comments received, the City of Yakima has issued the enclosed SEPA Threshold Decision. This decision may be appealed within 15 days from the date of mailing. Appeals must be in writing and on forms available from the City of Yakima. Planning Division, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. The fee of $505.00 must accompany the Appeal Application. For further information or assistance, you may wish to contact JeffPeters, Assistant Planner at (509)575-6163 at the City Planning Division. Doug Maples �ri, Planning & C•fe Administration Manager' Notice of Decision Mailing Date: July 8, 2005 Enclosures: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Mailing Map Yakima �n•a�c,cm INDEX 1 I II' I # - 1994 CITY OF YAKIlY)AR SEPA r Til GA'T ED DETERMINATION Ods,, NONSIGNIFICANCE July 8'2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. "" "�."�aas .. ,�' PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FiLt NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code Y_MC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima' s Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. DOC, INDEX 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69 Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69" Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. • Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. There is no comment period for this MDNS ❑ This Fianal MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 DOC INDEX —� A M iAT2 ¢i res : `29 9 l� L Street, Y nkiraa, WA 9891 1 Date July 8, 2005 Signature You maynappeal this determination to: Doug Maples, Building Codes & Planning Manager, at 129 N 2 Street, Yakima, WA 98901. No later than: July 25, 2005 B, (method) Complete appeal application form and payment of $505 appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the City of Yakima Planning Division to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeal 0 There is no agency appeal . INDEX PRESS RELEASE Notice of Application & Public Hearing: The City of Yakima has received an application for the following project that may be of interest to you. You are invited to comment on this proposal. Date of permit application: April 29, 2005 Date of determination of completeness: April 26, 2005 Date of notice of application: June 16, 2005 Comment due date: July 6, 2005 Project Description: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet, coupled with an environmental review. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. Project Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Project Applicant: Pete Olson for Frank Baehm. P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Environmental Review: The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and preliminarily issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) for this project. A copy of the final threshold determination may be obtained on request and may be appealed pursuant to YMC 6.88.170. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: Street extension for fire safety and public infrastructure such as curb, gutter sidewalks and signalization for safe passage for children to school. Required Permits — The following local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project: Building Permit, Street Break Permit, Clean Air Permit, Traffic Concurrency Review. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. 1f you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163. DAG. INDEX REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS You do have the right to comment on this application and become a party of record. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on this proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. All written comments received by 5:00 pm July 6, 2005 will be considered prior to issuing the final determination on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, City of Yakima, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This long plat request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for August 11, 2005, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e- mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. NOTICE OF DECISION A copy of the final SEPA determination will be mailed to you after the end of the 20 -day comment period. DOC INDEX, G-5 tJe4sk 4741;2.1 - PRESS RELEASE CITY OF YAKIMA PRELIMINARY SEPA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE June 16 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima' s Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. INDEX # G_ Mitigation: Ali :mitigation, dedication and site improveinents required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 — 12,08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer and Traffic Engineer. 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: a. The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches, streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 7211d Ave. and in S. 71st Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d. All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Nill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave. to 72nd Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. ❑ There is no comment period for this MDNS ❑ This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. 0 This Preliminary MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. All comments must be submitted by: 5:00 pm July 6, 2005. DOC_ Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date June 16, 2005 DOC. INDEX STATE OF WASHINGTON ,)) l [faT'e nt.�?�PP�IcsZiaisv 4p129; 2001 a. •'., ,Date: of deter_nifnattOrtek oompieten'ess; Apnl. 6,'2Qi Date'01' iotice ofAiplicatibn ,3ifn$°f 6:2005'. Comment,44:0ate0iiiii• romp escripjon:l..oh4niat.. 'T.41t7-.f deal WdtS G . #euietir?���tljB per' osed;ian a s t6ppose 'o pe ix. wL�lu '� m rofect l'Oo o 41.g f3 ;;t?rb�ect:Arinticartc:_+,'�;: etew�°� OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BUSCH, being first duly sworn on oath deposes anrd says .e is the Accountant of Yakima Herald -Republic, Inc.,, _f newspaper. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper approved Superior Court of the State of Washington for Yakima y under an order made and entered on the 13th day of February, and it is now and has been for more than six months prior re. he date of je; publication hereinafter referred to, published Af`he English language continually as a daily newpaper in gtat=:la, Yakima County, Washington. Said newspaper is now and has 'during all of said time �.. printed in an office maintained ae aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. ly ha Mt the annexed 'EnVi ritii-; f r nonsig cteIGieGrri-Griib.re W . AL NOTICEthe prole.g. tifor..pabeeadvhV einentallm: 'pactsarddemiraritMeOAO'4tetjtalea t9FlitiaHi* . : fnd.: $:P.i:ok iKz .4:0 threshol '; 4'e`to?' . after"-,kii4 • E, to ori o`d T i rria"y:t e,'ept' 'iJ Pursaarif;io'31"fv1C 8 . thkf. rota 0icr 4hKns: �a ii3 ei �t at i _. ofih p to,nlitagat'evir a` t, i;,o§p, h ,la nt4 larafloft t . lit!` mit t". ` ,t x.14. 1ii' titti'for'' afe'"es"sato cii d on p4$ ' *kie A lg.0,91,a1-'needed for, Af a prapq d protpo • ttgn-,of AWas not in supplement $��;d gas published in regular issues ..4:;aid newspaper once each DAY and for period of pplement form) '�` 1 to -wit; on a is a true copy of a: Notice of Applic, Oeq (.rtr . erinf s., j re rfp[i wan .;logs) sSate v federal utiititi .,:ee eteW:f'e!t?iiiT' seri -ef-, �. 8: mit-�4 fCif''GgCi�{�f'1+O�i,..�re�;W RequireiirSF %Rc):. turf o_�° e; ' a c _ , ;P'4.w ix sti Priowir fitirt 2 et r . bg?'rpent,te9ilia, ti$ iWji:ti s ' aeric tf , ro1� 9 ci ii .0' TtYe'flfe onttainia edt `ete " ,;;:,r, r,... _.._w' at �t . 7LNi g-nta i,n,o tj©r s,apa able .for pubalc:,ireview.+atKtti�.'(rS�iv'ni Fiati;':,� ,bi;,.. tlbo,r; t;!-`1'liy:" Otl•tjid�S ARAB a t 9 "if Y0910 YAtfeAti'bbfO l to proposely PJe se ejt+'tlg e terga;-41Aapt t?laser,�a. J,5o19}b75 ' " -- -"`s =f; ;1 n;?t'x�t.';'YF;�J���-fii�'X. '+;.x..e, _... s"...:e, the 16th day of JUNE, 2005 such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged foregoing publication is the of $221.04 Accountant SWORN to before m4_his 16th day t June, 2005 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yakima. DQL� INDEX LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Application & Public Hearing: The City of Yakima has received an application for the following project that may be of interest to you. You are invited to comment on this proposal. Date of permit application: April 29, 2005 Date of determination of completeness: April 26, 2005 Date of notice of application: June 16, 2005 Comment due date: July 6, 2005 Project Description: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet, coupled with an environmental review. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. Project Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Project Applicant: Pete Olson for Frank Baehm. P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Environmental Review: The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and preliminarily issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS) for this project. A copy of the final threshold determination may be obtained on request and may be appealed pursuant to YMC 6.88.170. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: Street extension for fire safety and public infrastructure such as curb, gutter sidewalks and signalization for safe passage for children to school. Required Permits — The following local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project: Building Permit, Street Break Permit, Clean Air Permit, Traffic Concurrency Review. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163. DJC INDEX G-7 REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS You do have the right to comment on this application and become a party of record. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on this proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. All written comments received by 5:00 pm July 6, 2005 will be considered prior to issuing the final determination on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, City of Yakima, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This long plat request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for August 11, 2005, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e- mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. NOTICE OF DECISION A copy of the final SEPA determination will be mailed to you after the end of the 20 -day comment period. PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE ONLY ON THURSDAY, JUNE 16, 2005 Mail Invoice and Affidavit of publication to: Account #11002 City of Yakima, Planning Division 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 DOC. INDEX LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF YAKIMA PRELIMINARY SEPA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE June 16 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental review of a Preliminary Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. PROPONENT: Pete Olson / Frank Baehm. LOCATION: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. PARCEL NUMBERS: 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, Washington. FILE NUMBER: EC# 19-05 The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing a completed environmental checklist, public and agency comments, and other related information, has determined that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), provided the measures listed below are taken to mitigate potential adverse impacts. The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public on request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) is hereby conditioned upon the following mitigating measures. Substantive authority to require mitigation is derived from WAC 197-11-660, Yakima Municipal Code YMC 6.88.160, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, which contain goals, policies, and regulations, which provide substantive authority to require mitigation under the State Environmental Policy Act. Mead Ave. at this location is currently listed on the City of Yakima's Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) as an intersection planned for signalization. The City of Yakima's Municipal Code YMC 12.06.060 (A), supports this plan and the proposed extension of Mead Ave. stating the "Street pattern shall provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing and new streets. In conjunction with the City of Yakima's goals, development regulations and the developer's site plan this new development will provide adequate street extensions as well as infrastructure to ensure safe passage to and from schools and supports the continuation and signalization of Mead Ave. +D60r INDEX i'lltigation: All mitigation, dedication and site improvements required of the developer shall be installed or bonded for prior to any construction on the proposed property and shall conform to the directives of YMC 12.01 -- 12.08 and direction of the City of Yakima Engineer and Traffic Engineer. 1. Development & Transportation Requirements: The applicant shall dedicate and develop all needed future street right-of-way for the extension of Mead Ave. and all other rights-of-way necessary for the development of the Preliminary Plat of HEDGEWOOD as depicted upon the applicants site plan received April 29, 2005. b. A Five-foot sidewalk with drainage, barrier curb, gutter, residential approaches streetlights and asphalt paving, as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer, shall be installed or bonded for on all streets and frontages within the Plat of HEDGEWOOD. as specified under Chapter 12.05 thru 06 of the Yakima Municipal Code. c. The applicant or his/her contractor shall additionally install an eight -inch sewer main in the extension of Mead Ave. from approximately 69th Ave to the intersection of S. 72nd Ave. and in S. 71St Ave. to the proposed end of HEDGEWOOD COURT in accordance with Chapter 12.03 of the Yakima Municipal Code. d, All domestic water for this development shall be installed to Nob Hill Water Co. standards. e. The City of Yakima will install approximately one hundred fifty feet of sidewalk on the north and south sides of the proposed Mead Ave. in conjunction with an approximate eleven foot wide turn lane complete with traffic signal, provided the developer dedicates the needed property to extend Mead Ave. from approximately 691 Ave. to 72na Ave. as specified by the City of Yakima Engineer and completes the required infrastructure prior to the City of Yakima improving this intersection. Should the developer fail to complete or bond for the required infrastructure prior to the specified time the developer shall install all required improvements at his or her expense. 2. Dust Control: A Dust Control Plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority prior to any phase of work. ❑ There is no comment period for this MDNS ❑ This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. ® This Preliminary MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. All comments must be submitted by: 5:00 pm July 6, 2005. DOC INDEX (.;- 1 Responsible official: William R. Cook Position/Title: CED Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone (509) 575-6113 Address: 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Date June 16, 2005 PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE ONLY ON THURSDAY, ,JUNE 16, 2005 Send Invoice and Affidavit of Publication to: Account #11002 City of Yakima, Planning Division 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, Wa 98901 INDEX #6 STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: Prel Long Plat#3-05, CL(2)#9-05, ADM ADJ#8-05 & EC#19-05 Pete Olson for Frank Raehm 1419 S. 72nd Ave. I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application, Environmental Review and Public Hearing before the Yakima City Hearing Examiner, a true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the applicant and all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property and SEPA Agencies. That said property owners and agencies are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 16th day of June, 2005. That I mailed said otic +h . hie , i 2_.l1. _d that all _ f the , I L 1 11I II L1 aalu 11vul.,es ii11 a IC manner 1 ICl II 11 set lul 111 d(10 1111.1 ctll of IFl statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson Planning Specialist INDEX Transportation Planner YVCOG 6 S 2nd St. Suite 605 'akima, WA 98901 Mr. Doug Mayo Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Coordinator Bureau of Indian Affairs PO Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 Mr. Wolferd Yallup, Chan Yakama Tribal Council PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Soil Conservation Dist Attn: Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry St Suite F Yakima, WA 98902 uric Barstrand Dept. of Fisheries 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, Wa 98902 Mr. Scott Nicolai Yakama Indian Nation -Fisheries P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima School District Attn: Ben Soria 104 N. 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 WV School District Attn: Peter Ansignh 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908 l Mr. Bill Beckley Yakama Indian Nation Environmental Protection Prog. P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Federal Aviation Administration Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. Renton, WA 98055-4056 WSDOT Aviation Division John Shambaugh 3704 172nd St. N.E. Suite K-12 Arlington, WA 98223 Mr. Marty Miller Office of Farmworker Housing 1400 Summitview #203 Yakima, WA 98902 Donna J. Bunten Critical Areas Coordinator D.O.E., Shorelands & Environ. Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Martin Humphries Yakima Valley Museum 2105 Tieton Dr. Yakima, WA 98902 Mr. Buck Taylor, Manager Yakima Airport 2400 W. Washington Ave. Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 S. 18th St. Yakima, WA 98901 ALWAYS SEND TO APPLICANT Leh (1 / ( 5 Aire � PT 45 DOG. INDEX Army Corps P 0. Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Sheila Ross Cascade Natural Gas 701 S. 1" Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Chamber of Commerce lON9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Kathleen Holscher, City Mor City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Olne1as Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly Dept. of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adm Bldg. Mali Stop AX -41 Olympia, WA 98504 Gwen Cl eaI Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology, Environ Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WA State Emergency Mgmt. Div. Mitigation, Analysis & Planning Supervisor Building 20 Camp Murray, WA 98430-5122 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 i Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Mr. Paul Donahue Dept of Soc/Health Service ('apital Prngr, ame rw,. i i,i1„3f7 MS' OB -23B Olympia, WA 98504 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W. 4th Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation Planning Engineer 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Environmental Protection Agency 1200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, WA 98903 Nob Hill Water Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 N. Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 Dept. of CTED Growth Management Services P.O. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 } Mr. Greg Griffith Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98.504 WA State Attorney Gen. Office 120 S 3rd St #100 - Vt7 . nol(1+ J. a ui a, YY t"). 7O11/1 Mr. Richard Smith Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 314 N 2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Blake avis Q- West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Ylkima Co. Commissioners 128 North tad Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Steven Erickson Yakima Co Planning 128 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Redifer Yakima Co Pub. Services 128 N 2nd St., 4`h Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Bill Bailey Yakima Cnty Dev. Serv. Ctr. 128 N. 2nd St. 4t° Floor Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Caroll Palmer Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 ,-, Toppenish, Vfj 48 -81332-21470 .'NOMAS E & STEPHANIE L WARD .515 S 73RD AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 --1332-21432 bD M ALLAN PO BOX 516 NACHES, WA 98937-0516 8. 9-34412 18 BEST VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC WE ?0 BOX 8310 PO JNION GAP, WA 98903 YA .81329-34404- .'AKIMA COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT -000 AHTANUM RD JNION GAP, WA 98903 L40 labels printed i Pete Olson P 0 Box 8021 Ya'ima, WA. 98908 329-34 T VAL Y 'ROPERTI BOX :310 IMS, WA 989•: :310 181332-12521 YUKIKO MORI 1546 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 for map sheet ingpl6t-3-05 6,24 )91332-21433 _RISHA WILLIAMS 1513 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 81329-3 41 EST V LEY PROPERTI _ LLC 0 BO 8310 NI•' GAP, -:903 Cindy Noble NERD 5609 W. Arlington Ave Yakima, WA. 98908 /We" • d' 4pp , S&P e f/4/6,c DbC. INDEX 6 81329-43419 LLEJO & VERONICA NARANJO JR 425 S 69TH AVE =MA, WA 98908 .81329-43406 3EATRICE M SCOTT .436 S 69TH AVE 'AKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-12511 3RADFORD J & SUSAN L MC MILLAN 5831 W KING ST xAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12472 " 'DREW R & DONNA M BLACK 34 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12528 BESSIE V PICKENS 1517 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12476 BRADLEY E & TERRI A TRISLER 1521 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 L81332-12510 181332-21481 3RIAN J & JILL M DAVISON BRIAN S & VERONICA L MAZIE 1521 C AVE8TH 1506 VALLEY WEST AVE o o .� n_ YAKIMA, WA 98908-5600 YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43433 BRYAN E & TYRAN E H MAINS 1429 8 6RTH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12412 CHARLES W & MICHELLE J CARLSON 7003 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12416 CHRISTOPHER LEONARD 1508 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43425 CRAIG M & CHRISTINA WARNER 1428 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21466 DAVID & GALE J AVILA 1506 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43463 DEAN & ELMA THOMPSON 7106 GREGORY PL YAKIMA, WA 98908-5729 181332-12415 DON E JONES 7004 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21476 C CARL & DONNA MAZIE 1503 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12426 CHERYL A WALKER 1606 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21473 CL,ARENCE: n ZET.T En 1509 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34007 DALE B & RHEA MURPHY 1308 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1916 1A115')-01472 DAVID A & VIRGINIA R SHUEL 8210 OCCIDENTAL AVE. YAKIMA, WA 98903 181332-21484 DENNIS BRIAN JONES 1512 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1955 181329-43428 DONALD & SHERRY DONOVAN 6831 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12414 BARRY J ETUX ROSS '006 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181332-21434 BILLY J & SUSAN L TERRY 1511 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12422 BRENDA E UNDERWOOD 7006 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2042 18.1332-12465 RRVAN C 4. T.TSCA MADTIM 1546 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43423 CHAN I & YONG S CHONG 1436 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 989ii8 181332-12417 CHRISTINE L WILSON 7003 KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12459 CRAIG J & SHERRY DAVENPORT 1601 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12012 DANIEL N & SHARON C JOHNSON 1603 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1962 181332-12477 DAVID C & SAUNDRA L ALLEN TR 1525 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43426 DENNIS M & JERRIANNE SILLERY PO BOX 11106 YAKIMA, WA 98909 181329-43427 DOLT S & HYUNG S LEE 1420 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43414 DOUGLAS C & LINDA M STOLZ 1420 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 18.1.029-43422 DWAIN C & MARY ANN SCHRANK 1440 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 -181332-12445 EVA M ET AL LUST 1603 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2003 91329-43014 ).UGLAS H LEMON 1317 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1917 181332-12516 EDWARD B & CHRISTINE L MILES 1526 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43417 FRANCIS D & DARLENE A SMITH 6833 LOGAN AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1 181332-12003 1• FRANK BAEHM F 1419 S 72ND AVE I 1 YAKIMA,. WA 98908-1958 Y 181332-12468 FRED JR & BARBARA LIEBERT 1537 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1329 4 ANK -Ai 19 7 KI 3011 HN ND E 8908-1958 181332-12458 GAGOUSH JAMES & TAMYRA 1600 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5507 1t' `2-21439 181329-43471 81329 466 G L & CAROLYN L BELLES GARY L & CINDY FISHER ARY & CINDY 1_ VALLEY WEST AVE 6902 WILLOW PLACE 5 = MEA OW L YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 YAKIMA, WA 98908 . IMA, W :908 '81332-21475 • bOUGLAS P & NANCY J GROENIG 1505 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12447 EDWARD G OLSON 1507 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12407 FRANK & TAMARA GODINA PO BOX 163 _ BUENA, WA 98921-0163 181329-43418 FRANKLIN I & BECKY E SCOTT 1421 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181329-43434 GARY F & LORENE L M PERO 1433 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 181329-43472 GARY L & CINDY L FISHER 7515 MEADOW LN YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12519 GREGORY J & JULI N KNOEBEL 5501 MEADOW LANE CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-3692 181329-43436 IRVING D & NANCY D BENSON 1441 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43432 GERALD L & NORMA L HILL 1425 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21478 HELEN H WENDT 712 GHORMLEY RD YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21483 JAMES G & DENISE A HELMS 7709 LOREN PL YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12004 GERALDINE SALI 1505 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 IS -1ER 181332-12473 HOWARD & BEVERLY DARROW 1530 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43411 JAMES K & DIANE L THOMAS 1432 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12409 181329-43467 181329-43465 JAMES K & MARI R MC KELLAR JAMES 0 & JEANNE LOWELL JAMES R & SUSAN RICHMOND 1507 S 70TH AVE 11303 NE 60TH ST 7102 GREGORY PL _ Y7 A, WA 98908 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 YAKIMA, WA 98908 O D int. �,. ThDEY 181332-21474 JAMES R. & MARILYN LANE 819 CONESTOGA BLVD YAKIMA, WA 98908-2420 181332-12423 JASON R & LAURA D SCHILLING 7004 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12462 JAY M & JACKIE C WEESE 1606 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA WA QRG(1R "81332-21486 JEFFERY BOONE .600 VALLEY WEST AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908-1965 L81332-12512 JOHN A & ELSA J RIGGIN 1542 S 68TH AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-12518 JONATHAN L & KAREN R DE VANEY 1529 3 68TH 4oiAVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-21435 JOSEPH N. & KYUNG BENSCH L509 VALLEY WEST AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 L81332-12479 KELLEY WIES L533 S 69TH AVE LAKIMA. WA 98908 L81332-21477 KEVIN J & DEBRA CRAWFORD 1510 S 73RD AVE tAKIMA, WA 98908 L81329-43415 .,AWRENCE B & LINDA K SULLIVAN 3921 W LOGAN AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908-5512 L81332-21431 LEON D & DELANE R MILLER L603 VALLEY WEST AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12522 .,ORNE J & MARGARET L HOUSE ;821 W KING ST CAKTMK, " WA 9'8906 L81332-21463 6ELVIN HARRIS JR 7300 W MEAD AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908-1853 L81332-21464 6ICHAEL J & KINDRA J ZITO 1502 S 73RD AVE CAKIMA, WA 98908 1329-43408 .'FRFV J & LINDA LARKIN HENJUM 1441 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12464 JOHN W DISTLER 1550 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA. WA 9RanQ 181332-12419 JOSEPH K & BARBARA K HUSTON 7007 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908-2043 181329-43412 KARL & TERESA ISHIZAKA 1428 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12509 KELLY D & SHARON LEE MADSON 1522 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12413 KIM & KERRY NEWMAN 7007 SCOTT CT YAKIMA, WA 98908-2045 181329-43421 LAWRENCE By& SHAR L FAIN 1433 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21437 LEZLIE A BEALER 1505 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 181332-12471 LOWELL KENNETH BISCHOFF 1549 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA-7-71A 98908- 181329-43405 8908 181329-43405 MICHAEL A & CAROL E LAMBERT 1440 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43416 MICHAEL R & ANNETTE LAFLEUR 6917 W LOGAN AVE VZ.WTM8 WT2\ oQonQ_ccin p1332-12448 OAN V ARNOLD 1515 S 72ND AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43407 JON E & KELLY J CASEBEER 1437 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12418 JOSEPH M & FRANCES GLENN 7005 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 T 181332-12514 KEITH & JULIE MEADOWCROFT 1534 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1813-32-12498 KENNETH R & CLEONE L BERRY RI 1602 8 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12515 KIM FILINGERI 1530 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-34410 LDS CHURCH OF JESUS CHRI 50 E NORTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, Utah 84150 r- 181332-21438 LISA LLAMAS 1503 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12446 MARION J & JOYCE E BLANK 1601 S 70TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 9890E 181332-21436 MICHAEL H & MELISSA N 1507 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1956 `tn 181332-12425 MICHAEL S KENNEDY --- 1602 S 70TH AVE Rr'"7NC: 181332-21479 MIKAL HEINTZ 1502 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181s32-21471 NANCY A NYBERG 1513 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-1918 181332-12460 PATRICK J & JANICE ARENS 1604 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43470 RALPH D & JUDITH E GILMAN PO BOX 272 MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 181332-21480 RAYMOND I & SYLVIA P SANCHEZ 1504 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 91329-43420 !LDRED B PURSLEY 1429 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5511 181332-12013 NOB HILL WATER ASSOC 6111 TIETON DR YAKIMA, WA 98908 181329-43468 PAUL & MARGARET HAYDEN TRUSTEE PO BOX 12 YAKIMA, WA 98907-0012 181332-21465 RANDY & BROOKLYN TURNER 1504 S 73RD AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12529 RENN D ABRAMS 7101 W KING ST YAKIMA, WA 98908 )181329-43413 IIONTY L & VIVIAN G CARL 1424 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5510 181332-12513 OLIVIA WEITZ 1538 8 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 1:1329-43 P°.UL & Ps BOX 2 YAK , WA 9 r - - - RET H -0012 181332-12470 RAY A & LINDA L FLEMING 1545 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908-5509 181332-12517 RHODA ENSIGN 1525 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 USTI 19 2-21482 181329-43462 R; ID R & MICHELLE CARMICHAEL RICK & PENNY GEBHARD C 1ICC-12410 15, VALLEY WEST AVE 7104 GREGORY PL RICK& THA VANINA FOLKMAN 1505 S 70TH YAKIMA, WA 98908 YAKIMA, WA 98908 AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12475 RICK W & ALISA J ORAM 1522 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 -r 181332-12463 ROBERT S & KASANDRA A BAILEY 1609 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12469 RONALD W & GERI L JENNINGS 1541 S 69TH AVE YAKIidA; " wA` "389 181332-12520 ROBERT & CARLA WEEDIN 1537 S 68TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12474 ROGER L & LAURA RIDD 1526 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12411 RUBEN PADILLA 7001 SCOTT COURT YAKIMA; --'WA--9BP-0.8 -- 181332-12467 ROBERT E & PATRICIA SULLIVAN 1538 S 69TH AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-21485 ROMAN & ALMA ROMERO OROZCO 1514 VALLEY WEST AVE YAKIMA, WA 98908 181332-12424 SAMUEL G & SHANNON L SUTHERL 7002 W KING YAKIMA;- -WA-98'9'68 ---- - 181332-12421 181329-43424 SANDRA M & BRIAN D ROBILLARD-TEE SEAN J & RITA M GASSELING SOMJAI-B2RT6 710 W KING ST 1432 S G8TH AVE 1425 69THTHON YP \, WA 98908 YAKIMA, WA 98908-2197 YAKIMA, S 890' YAKIMA, WA 98908-55,06 11�. 181332-12408 181329-43435 V STEPHEN & MARIA SOM TERRY D & CYNTHIA L WRIGHT TERRY2P124E8 1509 S 70TH AVE1529 P & ELIZABETH R IRWIN YAKIMA, WA 98908 1437 S 68TH AVE 1529 S 69TH AVE YAKTMA. WA 98908 VAKTMA WA QR911A DEPARTMENT )COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEI' bPMENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager e www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 Notice of Application & Public u lic Hearing: The City of Yakima has received an application for the following project that may be of interest - to you. You are invited to comment on this proposal, Date of permit application: April 29, 2005 Date of determination of completeness: April 26, 2005 Date of notice of application: June 16, 2005 Comment due date: July 6, 2005 Project Description: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property proposed for division into 28 lots, which range in size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet, coupled with an environmental review. The proposed land use within this subdivision is proposed to be a mix of single-family homes and common wall duplexes. Project Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Project Applicant: Pete Olson for Frank Baehm. P.O. Box 8021 Yakima, WA 98908 Environmental Review: The City Y.,>;,w.., _ the of Yakima has �eviewcu proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and preliminarily issued a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (NDNS) for this project. A copy of the final threshold determination may be obtained on request and may be appealed pursuant to YMC 6.88.170. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: Street extension for fire safety and public infrastructure such as curb, gutter sidewalks and signalization for safe passage for children to school. Required Per suits — The following local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project: Building Permit, Street Break Permit, Clean Air Permit, Traffic Concurrency Review. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary INDEX Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163. REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS You do have the right to comment on this application and become a party of record. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on this proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. All written comments received by 5:00 pm July 6, 2005 will be considered prior to issuing the final determination on this application. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, City of Yakima, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - This long plat request requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing. This public hearing has been scheduled for August 11, 2005, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please call Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner at (509) 575-6163 or e- mail at jpeters@ci.yakima.wa.us. NOTICE OF DECISION A copy of the final SEPA determination will be mailed to you after the end of the 20 -day comment period. Encl: Vicinity Map, Mailing Map, Site Plan, Checklist, and Preliminary Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. D O iY INDEX Date: To: DEPARTMENT 6 }'OMMUNITYAND ECONOMIC nFV! ) MENT Planning Division Doug Maples, CBO, Code Admin. and Planning Manager 6 www.ci.yakima.wa.us 129 Ajnrth .Second Street 2nd _Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 May 23, 2005 Frank Baehm 1419 South 72nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98909 Subject: Determination of Application Completeness for requested UAZO Preliminary Long Plat # 3-05, Environmental Checklist EC #19-05, CL (2) #9-05 & ADM ADJ #8-05. Proposal: Long Plat of approximately 5.17 acres of (R-1) Single -Family Residentially zoned property into 28 lots ranging from 5000 to 6000 square feet in size. In addition to a Class (2) Review to allow common wall duplex construction and an Adminis alive Adjustment to the lot coverage standard allowing an increase in lot coverage to 55% coupled with an Environmental Review. Location: 1419 S. 72nd Ave. Parcel Nos. 181329-43011 & 181332-12003 Your application was initially submitted on April 29, 2005 and has been determined to be complete for further processing May 23, 2005. Continued processing of your request will include, but is not limited to, the following actions: 1. A Notice of Application is to be sent to all property owners within 500 feet of your site. This notice will include a request for public comments during a 20 -day comment period as is required by the City of Yglr;a„a Notice of Application is scheduled to be issued on June 10, 2005 and the comment period will end approximately 20 days from the date of mailing. 2. Following the comment period a SEPA Threshold determination will be issued. This is followed by a 15 day SEPA Appeal period. If not appealed a staff report w be prepared by the Planning Division, which will include a recommendation to the hearing examiner as well as any recommended conditions of approval. 3. An open record public hearing will be scheduled before the City of Yakima's hearing examiner following all the required comment & appeal periods. The public hearing will commence at 9:OOAM in the City Council's hearing chamber at City Hall. The hearing examiner will issue a recommendation to the City Council on this application. 4. Following the receipt of the Hearing Examiner's recommendarions, a closed record public hearing will be scheduled for a City Council decision of your master application. You may contact me at (509) 575-6163 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, Jeff Peters Assistant Planner CC: Pete Olson & Bill. Hordan. } CITY OF YAKIMA LAND USE ACTION INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Of eL 1 Y P144- t.3-eS Ki-oS Project Number: rt t2) 9 -os d Ftp "'9 Date of Installation: S- Z I -(25 Site Address: 14 19 - 1Z 4-0/ Ave - Location of Installation (Check One) / n/ Land Use Action Sign is installed per standards described in YUAZO § 15.11.090(C). Land Use Action Sign is installed in an alternate location on the site. Note: this alternate location (if not pre -approved by the Code Administration and Planning Manager) may not be acceptable by the Code Administration and Planning Division and is subject to relocation (at the owner's expense) to a more visible site on the property. The alternative location is: I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the Land Use Action sign layout specifications and installation standards, and that the sign will be maintained until a decision has been rendered. Applicants Name (please print) r4 0(5or) The Date S- 20- bS Applicants Si ure Telephone Number of Applicant yS-1///Z-- qt/.5- 1///2 -- The required comment period will begin when the Code Administration and Planning Division have received the Land Use Action Sign Installation Certification. The date of installation certificate receipt will begin the notice period. Failure to post a Land Use Action sign and return this form in a timely manner will cause a delay in the application review. Please remit the above certification and deliver; FAX at 509-575-6105; or mail to: City of Yakima, Code Administration and Planning Division, 129 North Second Street, Yakima, WA 98901. C)4, INDEX EXHIBIT f FRANK BAEHM EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER H Site Plans DOCUMENT DATE H-1 Site Plans and Proposed Plat of Hedgewood 4/29/05 REQUIRED ATTACHMENT: SITE PLAN Note: Producing the site plan from this template is preferred, however, the template can be substituted for your own medium. (computer aided is acceptable.) I I 1 I f I I I ati 70r ro'X 15' — Pkrto. ACS 30' I0 6E7 QAC N UN IT A iINiT 13 30' 1001 --PATtO- A2EA 5' /U'1 W A i_k 10 rs 2G'sEBAclG DP -AVE 1- x wAt-K k• 14, 5'5ET-AGK to -o eo roc) —ry p►cAL✓ DU?LE i I I LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION a) F.00tprint(s) of Existing Structure(s) /' SQFT b) Building Addition/New Structures) Footprint(s) 3Z5O SQFr c) Paved Area(s) (Driveways, Walkways, patios, etc) Total /atz SQFT d) Proposed Paved Area(s) e) Total Impervious Surface (a+b+c+d e) Lot Size Lot Coverage (e/f x 100 = g) SQFT 862— SQ-FT. SS.y•SQ 96 MAP SCALE (Please use the given scale, however, in some circumstances a different scale may work better.) CHECK ONE .I4 -Preferred Scale: 1 inch on the map - 20 feet on the ground T7 Custom Scale: 1 inch * Template tie. marks are 1 inch apart Produced by (print) t1A LeOo`tX Date: x4127 o • RECEIVED APR 2 9 2005 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. PARKING CALCULATION (Reference Table 6-1 of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance) a) •� space(s) required b)� / space(s) provided LOT INFORMATIQN Parcel it(s) I'5 13 p'1 " 't13 (,1J1 4 l f5 i^,• 32 - /'poo'? Site Address Icli9 5w-4-rtt s/ Zoning R- I Legal Description (brief) SEs: fhlf...te.4,4TiceJ • MD UL • u • o Applicant Name PeT Or...5oL) Site Address 1-1 f9 50,-.07-1 72'LI 0 Aug' Mailing Address P,0, "Fav f,0'-1 (.i'414rrnA• co% Contac[ Person Ye; -I -r_ 64-.5,D6-) Contact Phone: (si) ff ,,`r 1-/-=-11/2.- LJ�Ur Applicant Signature REQUIRED ATTACHMENT: 1 SITE PLAN Note: Producing the site plan from this template is preferred, however, the template can be. substituted for your own medium. (computer aided is acceptable.) y. I f 1 LOT COVERAGE CAT CULATION a) Footprint(s) of Existing Structure(s) b) Building Addition/New Structure(s) Footprint(s) c) Paved Area(s) (Driveways, Walkways, patios, etc) d) Proposed Paved Area(s) e) Total Impervious Surface (a+b+c+d = e) Tot Size Lot Coverage (e/f x 100 = g) 0 SQFC 9,9�s'O SQFr Total 1aia . SQFr SQFT 'tubo SQFT tai oop gQFT X5:4 % MAP SCALE (Please use the given scale, however, in some circumstances a different scale may walk better.) CHECK ONE O Preferred Scale: 1 inch on the map = 20 feet on the ground 13 Custom Scale: 1 inch - * Template tie marks are 1 inch apart Produced by rint l faYhA l :r owls Date: .9 NORTH ARROW ViJ�i i�� 1 Jti W�'c LI_ RECEIVED APR 2 9 21105 oF PLANNNINYG 0'v PARKING CALCULATION (Reference Table 6-1 of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance) a) 'I space(s) required b) 4 space(s) provided IAT INFORMATION Parcel #(s) /Si3a9 if3ot1 .4 16133,Z- /3003 Site Address i' 1 Tq 9 72 M -f 4i s ZoningR-1 3ff5 APti.1.-e ,Pri Leggall Description (brief) BACKGROUND INFF,OMATIO Applicant Name `Y -7-A'" (1)1-50$0 Site Address 1"l1 9 6 72 1t)-6 Mailing Address PO. i36 C CO I Contact Person 4.0 (../4-ic(InA) 1)R 4o°.`�B4i Vkar c&e,: 7i' 1 Contact Picone: P1 9 ` (Indicate North) Applicant Signature • IN jJ CEN. SEC. 29, 7-13 N, R-18 E,NY Y.C.P.W, CASED MON, 9E LCR 1 M-1130 (NOT VISITED) P=ROPOSED PLAT OF HEDGEWOOD LOT 7 LOT (WILLOW Ica= LOTS 1 LOT S 89'34'10' E comp 20' PUBIJC SEANCE EASEMENT FRED uNDER AIAITOR'4 FEE N0, 7756479 6 1960.41 rte_ SE COR. SEC. 29, NE COR SEC. 32, 7-13 N, R-18 E.RU BRASS CAP SEE LCR 2 11-547 4 (NOT VISITED) W 0 0, a. NOTES S 89'39'25' 240.06' ..I 240.06': CEN. SEC. 32, 1-13 N, R-18 ENS Y.C.P.W. CASED MON. SEE LCR 7124149 8 3 12 6044 Sil. \, .:� -r- . � I 920 ` 13 �—'>_�.'—.�_ez.::�1LLl14. 1` 6129 11 6!' 1F P.Sr tau T 11nn 14 15 �. � 16 .. ' 17. •T 8930 $r Oi 0611 617 Idljpp _ 6006 SP 92.5' 67' 62.5' 62. ' 8 5' 70' • 2 S 89'39'25' E 1 I 1. LOTS 6, 7 AND 24 ARE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 2. LOTS 6, 7 AND 24 ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR DUPLEXES, AU. OTHER LOTS .ARE ZERO LOT LINE LOTS. 3. EXISTING HOUSE ON PROPERTY WALL EITHER BE REMOVED FROM SITE OR MOVED TO PROPOSED LOT 6, 7 OR 24. 4. STORM WATER DRAINAGE CREATED BY NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 1NLL BE RETAINED ON SITE 5. SOUTH 72ND AVENUE IS 50' NIDE, FACE TO FACE, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ASPHALT STREET 1V11H SIDEWALKS ON BOTH. SIDES. MEAD AVENUE IS 36' WIDE, FACE TO FACE, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ASPHALT STREET WM 140 SIDEWALKS 6. SANITARY SEWER IS PROVIDED BY 8' CITY OF YAKIMA SEWER HAMS, a111 7 WAN* NOTES (CONTINUED) 7. DOMESTIC WATER IS PROVIDED BY 8' NOB }BLL WATER YAWS. m CONNECT TO EXISTING SEVER, CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER. OWNER FRANK BAEHM 1419 S. 72 140 AVENUE YAKIMA WA 98906 DEVELOPER PETE P.O. BOX 8 21 YAKIMA, WA 98908 SURVEYOR/ENGINEER RICK WEHR PLSA ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 1120 W. UNCOLN AVENUE LEGAL DESCRPTIONS PARCEL A THE NORTH HALF ARTER, QUARTER, ORTHEAS QUARTER OF THE NORTHWESECTION 32, TOWNSHIPST 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M. AND THE SOUTH 124.62 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST SUQUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP RINET QUARTER, SOUTHWEST QUARX13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.U. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 145 FEET OF THE WEST 240 FEET THEREOF. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST SECTION 29, SOUTHWEST QUARTER, ORRTH, SOUTHEASTA1EEAAST,WW.w THENCE NORTH 1'03'20' WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF, 124.62 FEET; THENCE SCUM 89'34'10' EAST, PARALLEL N11H EAST UE NE 09'114UNE AT PORTIOSAID N CONgVEYED TO YAW40.01 IMA COUNTY FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S FILE N0.'S 1315320 AND 3038876, AND ME TRUE CE 001411/41.1940 SOUTH 89'34'10 NET, 36T OF 0.00 FEED THENCE SOUTH 103'20' EAST, 99.61 FEET, TO A PUNT SITUATE 25,00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 89'34'10' WEST, PARAUEL TO SAID SOUTH UNE 159.29 FEET; 'THENCE NORTH 0'25'50" EAST, 5,00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69'34'10" WEST, 170.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH EAST •OF THE NEST UNE97 OF SND TO 50601VISION SITUATE NCE NORTH 103'20' NEST, 226.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED 10 YAKIMA COUNTY FOR ROAD .RIGHT OF WAY BY AUDITOR'S FILE N0.'S 1315320, 3038876 AND 3038877, PARCEL 13 THAT P0R11ON OF THE SOUTH 124.62 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SOOT HEASTOUARTER OF SECTI 29, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, ,61,11. D AS FOLLOWS: BEGINAT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 5UBDIN510M, EH ANN 103'20' WEST, ALONG,JHE. NEST UNE THEREOF, 124:62 EET; 'THENCE SOUTH 89'34'10' BAST, PARALLEL NIT)( THR7 TH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 40,01 FEET, TO THE EAST` 'OF IFIATP0R110N CONVEYED 70 YAKIMA COUNTY M6.O1eAD RICHT OF. WAY 8Y AUDITOR'S -FILE N0. 1315320 ARD 6, AND: THE TRUE PUNT 10 BEGINN94GI THENCE. CON . 140 900TH 8934'10' EAST, 300.00 PEET; THENCE SOU. 1113'20' ET, 99.61 FEEL TO A PUNT SITUATE 20.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; NORTH 89'34'10' NEST, PARALLEL 10 SAID SOUTH UNE•'(59.29 FEET; THENCE NORM 0'25'50' ET, 5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'34'10' -WEST, 170.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 451659S' WEST. 42.97 FEET; TO A PUNT SITUATE 40.00 FEET EAST CF THE WEST UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 1'03'29" NEST, 226.37 FEET TO THE TRUE PUNT OF BEGINNING, 60 SCALE ; 1' . 60' RECEIVED APR 2 9 2905 nANFING DIY 120 160 FEET PLSA ENONIYEEAKINQ SURVE GTS G 15091 575-6990 PRELIMINARY PLAT PA9Ci1. WS 181329 - 43011 6 161332- 12003 —PREPARED FOR - 1 DRAWL BO JOE tom 3/18/2005 x06 No. 05047 BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STA'T'EMENT Item No. 1-3 For Meeting Of January 3, 2006 ITEM TITLE: Adoption of Resolution approving the preliminary plat of Hedgewood [Pete Olson, Developer] SUBMITTED BY: William R. Cook, Director Community and Economic Development CONTACT PERSON/'T'ELEPHONE: Jeff Peters, Assistant Planner (575-6163) SUMMARY EXPLANATION: In a public meeting held before the Yakima City Council on November 1, 2005 preliminary approval was granted to the plat of Hedgewood and other associated review. This plat will subdivide approximately 5.17 acres in the R-1 zone into 28 parcels. Today you are being requested to formally adopt the resolution granting this project preliminary approval. Resolution X Ordinance_ Contract _ Other (Specify) Funding Source APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: Cit anager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution BOARD RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. R-2006-04