Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-2003-110 Summitview Vineyards Final Plat Approval ( Jim Fickel )
RESOLUTION NO. R-2003-110 A RESOLUTION approving the final plat of Summitview Vineyards, a 16 lot subdivision located on the west side of N. 32nd Avenue approximately midpoint between Summitview and Lincoln Avenues, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the final plat of Summitview Vineyards, Jim Fickel as applicant therein. WHEREAS, on September 12, 2002 the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider the application for a subdivision known as Summitview Vineyards, located on the west side of N. 32nd Avenue approximately midpoint between Summitview and Lincoln Avenues, submitted by Jim Fickel, City Preliminary Plat #2-02; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2002, the Hearing Examiner issued his Examiner's Recommendation (Examiners No. 1UO2-4-12), recommending approval of the proposed plat subject to several conditions; and WHEREAS, at its public meeting on November 5, 2002, the City Council determined by motion that the Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be affirmed and adopted, together with the findings of the Hearing Examiner contained therein pursuant to Ch. 58.17 RCW, including but not limited to RCW sections 58.17.110 and RCW 58.17.195 (the "Examiner's Findings"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has completed construction of all public improvements required as conditions of approval of the preliminary plat, and the City Engineer has inspected, approved and accepted all such required improvements; and WHEREAS, as this final plat comes before City Council for review each member declares that he has had no contact with either the applicant or opponents of the final plat, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The proposed final plat for Summitview Vineyards, consisting of _2_ sheets dated June 2003 , showing a sixteen lot subdivision located on the west side of N. 32nd Avenue approximately midpoint between Summitview and Lincoln Avenues, is hereby approved pursuant to the Examiner's Findings, which are hereby adopted as the findings of the City Council and are incorporated by this reference as if set forth fully herein, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the final plat. The final plat for Summitview Vineyards shall be filed for record by the applicant in the Yakima County Auditor's Office immediately, or as soon thereafter as possible, and the applicant shall be responsible for all filing fees. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of August, 2003. ATTEST: City Clerk Place, Mayor City of Yakima, Washington Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Final Plat Staff Report City Council Public Meeting August 5, 2003 Plat of Summitview Vineyards UAZO Final Plat #2-02 Vicinity of 218 N 32nd Avenue Submitted By Jim Fickel Staff Contact: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner 575-6042 BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF REQUEST Summitview Vineyards is a preliminarily approved long plat calling for the subdivision of approximately 4.5 acres of R-2 and R-1 zoned property into 17 new lots (subsequently reduced to 16 lots.) On November 5, 2002 the Council accepted the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to grant preliminary approval to this long plat. The City Engineer's office has inspected and accepted all required physical improvements and the City Engineer has signed the plat in affirmation of this fact. The Planning Division has reviewed the final plat and finds it to be in substantial conformance with the terms and conditions of the preliminary plat. Staff, therefore, recommends acceptance of the final plat and the adoption of the resolution that authorizes the Mayor to sign the final plat. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approved preliminary plat required the applicant to complete all site improvements listed as conditions in the Heanng Examiner's Recommendation of October 3, 2002 (see attached). The conditions that must be met before the final plat can be approved consist of the following matters: 1. The City Engineer has agreed to a modification to this street design as well as to a deferment of the frontage improvements along N 32nd Avenue. A deferment agreement must be signed by the property owners, recorded and referenced on the face of the plat prior to recording. 2. Status: The deferment agreement has been recorded under Auditor's File No. 7343765 and is referenced on the face of the plat. On-site platted streets shall consist of a dedicated 50 -foot nght-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The cul-de-sac should be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right-of-way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. Status: Final plat includes the required dedication of right-of-way. The City Engineer's office has reviewed and approved the street improvement plans as being in 1 conformance with preliminary plat review. Construction of said improvements is completed with the exception of the streetlights, which are presently on order Financial security is being held to assure that the streetlights are erected. 3. All 7 7_�_ 1_ _ 1 7 7_ _ _7 _ _l with t 1 YMC All lots shall be piovideu public water and public sewer service according to Title 12 standards. Pnor to final plat approval written venfication from the City of Yakima Engineering Division must be provided to the Planning Division indicating that all water and sewer extensions have been completed or financially secured. Status: All necessary water and sewer lines are installed and stubbed out to the property lines. 4. A minimum 8 -foot wide public utility easement must be provided adjacent to all public road rights-of-way. Status: Public utility easements are shown as required. 5. Easements for new and/or future utilities shall be a minimum of 16 feet in width, provided that the width of easements for buried utilities will be twice the depth of the Manned excavation. Status: Accomplished. 6. All public and private utilities are to be located underground, with the exception of telephone boxes and similar such structures. �I Status:11Underground utilities are in place. All public and mutilities located within __b7__ road -1_.__ _t rua�u� private utilities to be located Willllll public; ri�i1LS-of-Way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction. Status: Accomplished. 8. Fire hydrants shall be placed at the locations specified by the Building Codes Division and Yakima Fire Department. All lots must be provided with adequate fire flow. Status: Accomplished. 9. Irrigation easements shall be provided or maintained as specified by the City of Yakima Water & Irngation Division. Status: Accomplished. 10. The final plat shall substantially conform to the preliminary plat, as modified by the City Council, or as modified to allow duplex construction that results in residential development densities below seven dwelling units per net residential acre on properties zoned R-1 as of the date of the final action be the City Council on the subject 2 applications. Status: The R-1 portion of the plat was modified from five lots to four to allow for duplex construction in the R-1 zoning district while maintaining the R-1 density of 7 or fewer dwelling units per net residential acre. 11. All permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authonty shall be obtained. Status: All required permits were obtained. 12. The developer shall contact the State Department of Ecology to determine if a baseline general permit for storm water discharges will be necessary. Status: This was accomplished and no permits were required. 13. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat. Status: All addresses are shown on the face of the plat, as required. 14. The final plat shall be subject to both addressing and site screening notes, which must be placed on the face of the plat: Status: The required notes are shown on the face of the plat FINDINGS 1. The final plat is consistent with the goals, objectives and intent of the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the standards of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. 2. The final plat meets the standards of the City of Yakima Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The final plat is in general conformance with the preliminary plat and conditions of approval. 4. The applicant has completed the construction of the required improvements necessary for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION The City of Yakima Division of Environmental Planning recommends Council acceptance of the final plat of Summitview Vineyards and passage of the resolution that authonzes the Mayor to sign the final plat. 3 City of Yakima - Engineering Division PIN SET S 56'11'59" EI 1.00' FROM CORNER r FENCE 0.20' NORTH & 0.60' WEST OF PIN FENCE 0.10' WEST OF PIN FENCEO0.F PI ' WEST 15N FENCE 030' WEST OF PIN FENCE 1 05' WEST OF PIN N THE PLAT SUMMITVIEW VINEYA'RDS 5E 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 E.W.M YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON 7.19 89.58'15"E FENCE 0.65' FENCE' 0.50' SOUTH OF PIN NORTH OF PIN 5' E01. GRMEM--"/ LOT 13 10.972 5.E' 3 230 N 3390 AVENUE rIN SET S 74'57'42" E .00' FROM CORNER - 85.71' FENCE 0.60' SOUTH k 33' WEST OF PIN LOT 12 7,248 5.E' 233 N 33R0 AVENUE 0D' 67.08' 4 LOT11 7.872 5.1 231 N 3380 AVLNUC 1 LOT 9 7.368 5.F 227 N 338)0 AVENUE 17134' 16091GC ELAYKP LOT 10 7,221 s.F 229 N 3300 AVENUE Aj LOT 6 8.199 5.F 3207 F0L500 AVENUE 108.9 LOT 16 10,880 5 224 N 3300 AVENUE 133 13' AUDITORS CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF JIM FICKEL, THIS DAY OF20_, AT MINUTES PAST _M AND RECOROED UNDER AUOROR'S FILE NUMBER RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EE A1)N70R DEPUTY A13DITOR 99.38' 1 .1.31,33: 0 68.73' .00' LOT 7 7,3125E 3205 FOLSOM AVENGE 100.00' 5' 10' DUSTING WATER, SEWER EASEMENT AUD. FILE N0. 1369576 N89.58'12"E 5' RR. EASEMENT LOT 6 7.039 5 F 3203 FOLSOM AVENUE o 8' P U. EASEMENT is H 27 73 NE COR. SEC. 27 1-13 N, 0-18 EWM CASE0 MON ENO. LCR 78-1637 LOT 5 7.533 S.F 701 FOLSOM AVENUE 88 00' 75 41' -.-'----'-'-'-. FOLSOM AVENUE - - -.-.--.-.-.-.-.-.-'-- N89.58'15"E 458.10' 85.00 LOT 1 8,313 5.F 3206 FOLS01.4 AVENUE 4. 05.00' FENCE 1.00' NORTH OF PIN 96.90 LOT 2 7.752 S.F m 3204 FOL50M AVENGE ).96.90' 111 N • A 96.91' 18 FENCE 0.76' 889.58')5•'6 FENCE 0.40' SOUTH OF PIN SOUTH OF PIN 6.91' 84.60' 8' P.U. EASEMENT LOT 3 7,753 5.E' 3207 FOLSOM AVENUE 5' 6X7. (nova 10' EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT AUD. FILE N0. 1324564 /L50 WE FILE N0. 902779 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE "I, JOSEPH AN00(031L PROFESSIONAL )AND SURVEYOR, DO NEREEM CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF SUMMTMEW VINEYARDS IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT, THAT THE DISTANCES. COURSES AND ANGLES ME SHOWN HLNLON CORRECTLY. AND THAT THE MONUMENTS AND LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN HEREON.^ '•r�6'�,71 (24,45.t: rA9,'0 i PIYANOREOTTI PLS 5831 DATED LOT 4 8.294 SE 3700 FOLSOM AVENUE - 105.00' FENCE 0 21 SOUTH OF PIN • 30.00' i Ti 40' INTERVALS •'1 i BASIS OF BEARING. EAST LINE Or THE NE 1/4 SECTION 72 r TWP13 N, RANGE 18 AS BEING N 0'25'00" W (ASSUMED) MONUMEMATION VISITED 1/2003 SURVEY METHOD' FIELD, TRAVERSE W/LLE77/SOKKSKA 50363/010 OREPRESENTS 3/8' RERAR/CAP SET FLUSH WITH CAP 5831 • W AIL EAST 1/4 SEC. 77 •REPRESENTS NAIL wASHER T-13 N. R-18 (907 •REPRESENTS 84413 CAP FOUND CASED MON. Fn. 77 SMONUME.NT LCR 2M-1897 CURVE DATA CURVE DELTA RADIUS 1ANGENI 1ENGIN Axone BOV0A11(0 A 0976'45- 20.00 19.66' 3178' 76.19' X44.13731 8 90'23'15" 20.00' 2014' 31 55' 2630' 544446'381V C 909300• 7800' 70.00' 31.47' 1878 su•56'Is'1 0 909000' 70.00' 20,00' 3142' 7628' N/591'45"R E 117716" 12510' 17.73' 25.36' 2534' 85'47'11'E F 31607" 12500' 3.75' 7.49' 7.49' 713.1917'( G 159485' 100.00' 1323' 2830' 2637 4770155 N 15'0485' 7500' 9.97' 1977' 1907' 147.30167 I 26.3911" 61.00' 15.59' 3057' 30.10' 97971'155 J 16.16101" 6110' 26.06' 49.26' 47.93' 866'50135 R 4557'40" 40.00' 1696' 32.00' 3123' 5679505') 1 14.00'49' 10.00' 1617' 3073' 7996' S71941005 M 531777' 4000' 70.33' 37.61' .3624' 117654'351 N 6990'47- 40.00' 77.50' 40.18' 45.37' X865104.7 0 307.491/7• 10.00' 77.44' 37M' 3737' 146656.54") 43.00' 51'30167 SCALE. 1' -40' Eg©Cilt\ TES M. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 305 NAM 6m A"914x, Yolire. 16481VAM,,, 90907 1509) 153 6291 THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS SC.(' r - 40 SE 1/4, NE 1/4 01 SEC. 77m SLK /.w 511[: AMC, 7003 TOWNSHIP 13 N RANGE 18 FAN SMr1 i o - FOR: JIM FICKEL AND f3I1 I I YNCH 14193, -14491, -74195, -14496, -74497 11',15 1 1 73117'1110rv( 47 PARENT PARCEL No 181372- City of Yakima - Engineering Division THE PLAT SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS SE 1/4, NC 1/4 OF SECTION :22 TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 E.W.M. YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARENT PARCELS PARCEL No 101322-14493 LOT 1 OF THAT EP111 OF SI -TWAIN ADDITION, A5 RECORDED N VOLUME "0' OF PLATS. PAGE 37 SITUATED N YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE Or WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14494 LOT 2 OF THAT REP1A1 OF SHUMAN ADDITION AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0" OF P1A75, PAGE 37 SITUATED N YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14495 LOT 3 OF THAT REPEAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0" OF PLATS, PAGE 37 SITUATED N YAKIMA COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No, 181322-14496 LOT 4 OF THAT REPIAT OF SHUMAN AOOI LION. AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0' OF PLATS, PAGE 37 SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL N0. 181322-14497 LOT 5 OF THAT REPLAY OF SHUMAN ADDITION. AS RECORDED IN VOLUME '0' OF PIAT5, PAGE 37 SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY. STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14515 ORE NoOF 1/41-1 SHORT8PLAT FILED UNDER YAKIMA COUNTY AUDITOR'S L SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON. NOTES LOIS 4 AND 5 SHALL NOT HAVE DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS ONO NORTH 32ND AVENUE. ONE STORY DUPLEXES CONSTRUCTED ON 1.015 IF DUPLEXES ARE CONSTRUCTED ON i 3. 14. 15 0 16 LUIS 13, 14,15AND 16. SHALLA SIX-FOOT NE NO MORE EW OBSCURING FENCE OF OTHER SCREEN NEXST5 BETWEEN NTLY THE LOTS AND SVEGATADON ING 5 FAREEN MILY RESIDENCES EXL BE INSTALLED ISTING ATERE THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT FKNG. THE ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ACCURATE AS 01' THE DATE OF RECORDING, BUT FMAY BE OR TTHHESCONf COTO CHANCE. THE CITY NFIRMATION OR EASSIGNMENTFYAKIMA BUI1 OF ADDRESS AT THEING OTIME OES F BUILDING PE NATSION IS ISSUANCE 51 T 70 {0 FERMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S E o RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APPROVALS OWNERS DEDICATION AND WAVER OF CLINES 'KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT JAMES D. FIC LEL AND SHELLY A FIGKEU INSBAND AND WEE. AND YIII IMI J 1090)1. A ENGLE PERSON ARE ALL PARTIES HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST N THE LAND HEREON DESCRIBED, HAVE. ALAN 09-1EN FREE CONSENT AND N ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR DESIRES CAUSED THE SAME 10 BE SURVEYED AND PUTTED AS SHOWN HEREON. DO HEREBYCE0CATE THOSE ROADS AND/OR RIGHT -OE -WAY SHOWN AS PUBLIC DEDICATIONS HEREON TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC. DO HEREBY WAIVE ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST AL1. CLAM.; FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CRY OF YAKIMA AND ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED TO THE ADJACENT LAND BY THE ESTABLISHED CONSTRUCTION. DRAINAGE AND MANTENANCE OF 5N0 DEDICATED ROADS NAVOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND DO HEREBY GRANT AND RESERVE THE EASEMENTS AS 5H0 WN HEREON FOR THE USES INDICATED X7-.� :STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF YAKIMA 55 ON THIS`E1DAY OF,JL4ggJ-2801t. BEFORE ME MPEAREDJIQNI_ F%syel- -E20, -4Cht ll O. & CAL KNOWN TO 8E THE PERSON(S) DESCRIBED IN l WHO EXECUI ED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ACKNOWLEDGES TOME THAT HE/SHE (THEY) SIGNED THE SALE A5 HISMER (THEIR) FREE i VOLUNTARY ACT FOR 1HE PURPOSES 8 USES THEREIN MENTIONED N WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET ! D A AFFIXED MY OFFICIN. SEAL NO ARY IIC�IN/AF/���' ;T4E701ATE WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF YAKIMA SS ON THIS 8DAY OF•LF 4f 20v_A, BEFORE ME APPEARED t...4+•0 . 3. L.`, `R kNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(5) DESCRIBED N i NATO EMECU TED THE FOREGOING IN5TRI1REHI ACKNOWLEDGES TOME THAT HE/SHE (THEY) SIGNED THE SAM AS HIS/HER (THEIR) FREE l VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE PURPOSES d USES THEREIN MENTIONED N WITNESS THERE or IH HEREUNTO SET MY HAND I AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL NOT TY PUBLIC IN L. FOR TFIE STATE 0 WASHINGTON RESIDING AT 1,34_p_g,i 4 THE CRY CFYAK.MI ENGINEER -I-. ( i.0&.,S THE CITY OF YAJO.IA ADM SOSTRATOR THE CITY OF YAKIMA MAYOR *UM ORS CERTIFICATE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD AT THE EOUEST OF .11.I FICKEL. 'T, JOSEPH ANDREOTTI, PROFESSIONAL tANO SURVEYOR, THIS . _ DAY OF TO DD HEREBY CERRFY THAT 711E PFA1 OF SI.MNffNEW VINE114)05 pT MINUTES PAST _IA AND REC0R0ED UNDER K B<5E0 UPON AN TA 0.5;/. SURVEY 'NAT= WRH AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER RECORDS OF THE REOUISURVEYMEHTS Of THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT, THAT YAKIMA COUNTY WASHINGTON CORRECTLY, TTHE DISTANCES, COURSES AND ANGLES ARE SHOWN HEREON WD TWAT TE MONIUMIENTS AND 101 CORNERS FEE HAVE BEEN SET ON THE GROUND A5 SHOWN HEREON.' AUDITOR 0Cf U1Y AUDITOR 015.3 P ANEI1 Gln PLS 5831 IY.11,0 G/t c/os TREASURERS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL CHARGEABLE REGULAR 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTIBLE THIS OFFICE THAT ARE DUE & OWING ON THE PROPERTY DE SCRIRE0 HEREON, ON OAS FATE CERTIFICATION. HAVE BEEN ��'P510.,,,,,, ,,,111 �1j DATED THI$�J WY OF /it,LILQ_• 2BA.7 AIWA CO NTY T8SURER50FF ICE 020©OQ4[E2 Qa6D CONSULTING ENGINEERS TOS Nos, SIM 3,9071509) 453 -am THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYAI 5E 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SEC. 22. DRAWN 131 0*16' N46. Moa 10WNSHR 13 N., RANGE 18 E11M 5<971) W FOR: JIM FICKEL AND BILL LYNCH PARENT PARCEL NO 181322- 1 PRAMNG RC -14493, -14494, 14495, -14495, -14497 -14515 12652":UR NDREOTTI SSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Bruce Bensen City of Yakima Planning Department 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 RS^ aur. s IC\on CVv;, wr,rso‘A‘+r % ilOH 305 NORTH 6TH AVENUE YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98902 (509) 453.8281 FAX (509) 453-0706 July 9, 2003 RE: Plat of Summitview Vineyard Dear Mr. Bensen: The following revisions have been made to the mylar for the above stated plat: 1. Title Report Record Matter #12 - Easement filed under Auditor's File No. 902779 added to face of plat. 2. Title Report Record Matter #15 - Easement filed under Auditor's File No. 1369579 revised on the face of plat. Title Report Record Matter #13 - Easement filed under Auditor's Fiie No. 80177 for PP&L could not be located at the Yakima County Auditor's Office. At the present time there are no overhead power lines in Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Parcel A. PP&L has install underground electrical wiring for the plat in the public utility easement shown on the face of the plat. Title Report Record Matter #16 - Easement filed under Auditor's File No. 2018589, this easement was established with 15 feet of right of way on 32nd Avenue for Parcel B. The road right of way is now 30 feet and includes the easement. See face of Short Plat 7277133. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact us. Sincerely, 3,pu Joseph Andreotti, PE PLS CIVIL ENGINEERING - - LAND SURVEYING Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee issued by Yakima Title & Escrow A Division of First American Title Insurance Co. 120 N Naches Ave, Yakima, WA 98901 Title Dicer, Del Rawlins Phone: (509) 248-7550 FAX: (509) 248-2319 First American Title Form No. 14 Guarantee No 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No. 1 Yakima Title & Escrow A Division of First American Title Insurance Co. 120 N Naches Ave, Yakima, WA 98901 (509) 248-7550 - FAX (509) 248-2319 YAKIMA COUNTY TITLE UNIT FAX (509) 248-2319 Title Officer: Del Rawlins (509) 248-7550 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE LIABILITY $ 1,000.00 ORDER NO.: FEE $ 150.00 TAX $ 11.85 YOUR REF.: First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company 4439-209055 Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Andreotti & Associates herein called the Assured, against Toss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for dosing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: June 19, 2003 at 7:30 A.M. First American Tide Form No. 14 Guarantee No. 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (410.75) Page No 2 SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in: James D. Fickel and Shelly A. Fickel, husband and wife and William J. Lynch, a single person on date of acquiring title, as his separate estate. B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any porition thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of that REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, As recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 37. PARCEL B: Lot 2 of Short Plat recorded under Auditor's File No. 7277133. APN: 181322-14493 APN: 181322-14494 APN: 181322-14495 First American Tide Form No. 14 Guarantee No. 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No 3 RECORD MATTERS: 1. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14493 lst Half Amount Billed: $ 101.03 Amount Paid: $ 101.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 101.04 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14494 1st Haif Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 101.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 101.04 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 3. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14495 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 101.03 Amount Paid: $ 101.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Haif Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 101.04 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 first American Tide Porn' No. 14 Guarantee No.: 4429-209035 Subdivision Guarantee (440.75) Page No, 4 4. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14496 1st Half Amount Billed: $ 101.03 Amount Paid: $ 101.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 101.04 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 5. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14497 lst Half Amount Billed: $ 101.03 Amount Paid: $ 101.03 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 101.04 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 101.04 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 6. General Taxes for the year 2003. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30th. The second half becomes delinquent after October 31st. Tax Account No.: 181322-14515 lst Half Amount Billed: $ 519.31 Amount Paid: $ 519.31 Amount Due: $ 0.00 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2nd Half Amount Billed: $ 519.32 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 519.32 Assessed Land Value: $ 0.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 First American Title Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Paoe No. 5 Guarantee No 4439-209055 7. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Yakima is at 1.53%. Levy/Area Code: 333 8. Drainage District No. 29 Assessment. For year Full Year Amount: Balance Owing: 2003 $ 326.96 $ 163.48 as to 181322-14515 9. This office has not been furnished a copy of the proposed plat, and we are unable to determine if the within premises and the property to be platted are identical. 10. Right to run water across the North side of said premises, reserved in 42 of Deeds, Page 266. Affects: Parcel B and Lot 1 of Parcel A 11. Easement for public utilities as delineated on said plat. 12. Easement along the South line of said premises for installation, operation and maintenance of a pipeline to be installed at least 2 feet below the surface of ground as existed June 7, 1940, under easement, Recorded: June 5, 1940 Auditor's No.: 902779 Affects: Lot 5 of Parcel A and B 13. Easement for electric transmission and distribution lines of one or more wires, and all necessary or desirable appurtenances, including telephone and telegraph wires, towers, poles, props, guys and other supports; and related matters. Recorded: Recording Information: Grantee: Affects: 14. An easement affecting the incidental purposes. p -K For: In Favor Of: Recorded: Recording Information: Affects: October 7, 1915 80177 Pacific Power & Light Company portion of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Parcel A portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and sewer pipe City of Yakima, a Municipal Corp. September 13, 1950 1324564 the South 10 feet of Lot 5 of Parcel A and the South 10 feet of Parcel B The Grantors shall have the right to use the surface of the ground over said pipelines for any purpose that will not interfere with the construction, maintenance, and operation of such pipe lines. First American Title Form No. 14 Guarantee Nc • 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.. 6 15. An easement affecting the incidental purposes. For: In Favor Of: Recorded: Recording Information: Affects: portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and sewer pipe City of Yakima, a Municipal Corp. July 6, 1951 1369579 — K 4 b " the North 10 feet of Parcel B The Grantors shall have the right to use the surface of the ground over said pipelines for any purpose that will not interfere with the construction, maintenance, and operation of such pipe lines. 16. Easement and right of way for the purpose of laying, operating and maintaining a water pipe or water pipes and sewer pipes with right of ingress to said pipe lines, granted to City of Yakima by ._ instrument of record. IQ Recorded: November 23, 1964 t h 0‘.0n Recording Information: 2018589 Affects:the15 f Ptof P rcel B East ede Parcal The Grantors shall have the right to use the surface of the ground over said pipelines for any purpose that will not interfere with the construction, maintenance, and operation of such pipe lines. Notes, easements, covenants and restrictions as depicted on the face of the short plat. 18. Matters relating to water and water rights. Pendency of Yakima County Superior Court Case No. 77-2-01484-5, an action by the State of Washington, Department of Ecology vs. James J. Acquavella et al., for the purpose of securing a judgment adjudicating the relative rights of all persons diverting, withdrawing, or otherwise making use of surface waters of the Yakima River Drainage Basin. INFORMATIONAL NOTES Note: Drainage District No. 29 assessment for year 2003 is paid in full. Amount: $ 40.77 As To 181322-14493 Note: Drainage District No. 29 assessment for year 2003 is paid in full. Amount: $ 39.18 As To 181322-14494 Note: Drainage District No. 29 assessment for year 2003 is paid in full. Amount: $ 40.77 As To 181322-14495 FirstAmerican Title Form No. 14 Guarantee No.. 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.. 7 Note: Drainage District No. 29 assessment for year 2003 is paid in full. Amount: $ 39.18 As To 181322-14496 Note: Drainage District No. 29 assessment for year 2003 is paid in full. Amount: $ 44.05 As To 181322-14497 Note: Said premises may be assessed annually by Drainage District No. 29. A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. First American Title Form No. 14 Guarantee No. 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No. 8 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that spedfic assurance are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the fo';o;nc (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or o\ tne records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water nghts, claims or title to water, whetne- or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of tne following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the descnption set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the naht to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically sot forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result In no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non -judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE comEmO,e5 AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in thls Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to In Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A) (C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records" • records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at Its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not It shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise Its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company Is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to fumish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be fumished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, If requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant Its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, Inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or govemmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Form No. 1282 (Rev 12/15/95) First American Title Form No. 14 Guarantee No. 4439-209055 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No • 9 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attomeys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exerdse by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any daim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay, Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth In this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or Interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method; including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed Its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss.or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured f3 - voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or su,t w,tnoct the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a daim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation Involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a daim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered Its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Tide Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Assodation. Arbitrable matters may indude, but are not limited to, any controversy or daim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breads of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is -$1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability Is In excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attomeys' fees only If the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered In any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Tide Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, If any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, thls Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg. 2, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Form No. 1282 (Rev 12/15/95) First American Title 13 ,-zcnn 7 23518 12 23508 23407 10 3 0.21 23506 40• 14503 12 14504 13 14505 10 1 14502 14493 9 2 14501 T 8 14500 14514 7277133 14515 14506 15 14509 1 SH 16 , 14507 14508 4 Z1490 10 14484 14053 2 14488 23439 41450 1449 3 41451 1448 41020 41016 0.32 410217 41019 418173 4W1112 418ag 419 41041 41042 41047 41039 0.27 41043 41046 41040 0.13 0.13 41.,afI5 4agg1 Range: 18 Township: 13 Section: 22 Yakima County Department of Assessment 128 N 2nd Street, Courthouse Room 112 Yakima, WA 98901 (509)574-1100 Data Set: 5/8/20031'40:23 AM i Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet ParcelView 1.0.3 This Map is maintained only as an aid in the appraisal and assessment of real property. The Yakima County Assessors Office does not warrant its accuracy. SPM 7Z77/55 CURVE DATA SE 1/4, TIE 1/4 OF SEC110N 22, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 E.W.M. YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON r NE -COR. SEC. 22 15 14 CA N. R-18 EWM CASED MON. 2ND. 22 23 LCR 214-1632 111 TANG C -I 350.00' 17'01'44' 104.02' 5240' 13-2 32.4.00' 17'01'45' 98 59' 486r C-3 300.00' 17.03'35' 99.50' 4509' C-4 300.00 17.01'44' 99.16' 4411' 48.697— C-5 C-6 325.00' 350.00' 17.01'45' 95.59' 1(118.25' 103.69' 52.23' o 2 d d 0 3CD 1 JEFFERSON AVENUE 0 Ix F•— t—•k,T 3�I z HAZELWOOD ADD. AUDITORS -CERTIFICATE FILED FARRECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THIS105% DLFAN3 RODBER r -1A, E13DM 5180" AUDITOR'S RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. AUDITOR CORKY MATTINGLY "X" IN CONC. DRIVE 5 FLAGG ADDITION 4 3 i 9'_,IB_15—i— —'- i - . P.U. EASEMENT E0ICATED HEREIN EXG FENC 2 N 89. 58' 15" E 214.33' i EXG 51' R.O.W 25 RAO 15' EXISTING WATER & SEWER 1 EASEMENT AUD. FILE NO. 20)0589 10' EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT AUG. FILE NO. 1304679 LOT 1 1.05 M. 308 NORTH 32140 AVENUE DDCAGED OEW& 15' RO *.r N 89. 58' 15" E 214.33 LOT 2 2.41 AC. 218 NORTH 32110 AVENUE 8' P.U. EASEMENT OEOICATED HEREIN EXC. EDGE OF PAVEMENT A 0 15'EXO. R.O.W.& 45' R.OW 1 .1 OEOICATED HEREIN I 1 R' 1 • EXISTING 12' i_ I WATER UNE I 1 EXG. 13" SEWER UNE _I _.I 0' EXISTINO SEWER EASEMENT AND. FILE 110. 1324564 AL50 ACID. FILE N0. 902779 HUNZINGERS ADD. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE "1, JOSEPH ANDREOTT1. PROFESSIONAL (AND SURVEYOR. 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY FOR J144 FICKEL 15 BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT, THAT 114E DISTANCES COURSES ANO'ANGLES ARE SHOWN HEREON CORRECTLY. AND THAT THE MONUMEMS AND LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET ON THE GROUND A5 SHOWN HEREON." S/P4loa ENO. 0.21' 501RH )a s, 13 EAST 1/4 SEC. 22 T-13 0, R-18 EWM1 CASED 14044. F140. LCR 214-1882 22 23 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARENT PARCEL pARCEI Na. 181322-14001 THE NORTH 423.23 FEET Or THE 5E 1/4 OF HE EE 1/4UTOF SECTION H 846.45 F22. TOWNSHIP EET OF THE A4'72 13 N. , FEET RANGE 88 EWA., LYING EAST OF 33R0 AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THE 8 (49 W�0 UM 0 ADDITION, ENUERDED 1N VOLUME "0" OF PLATS, PAGE 37. AND S SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. OWNERS DEDICATION Mn WAVER OF CW Ms -KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT JAMES D. FICIAL AND SHELLY A FICKEL. HUSBAND ANO WIFE ALD W9JAM J. LYNCH. A SINGLE PER80N, ARE ALL PARTIES HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREON DEECRIBEO: HAVE WITH THEIR FREE CONSENT AID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR DESIRES CAUSED THE SAME TD BE SURVEYED AND PLATTED A8 &401811 HEREON; DO HEREBY DEDICATE 7110S E ROADS AND! OR RIGHT-OF-WAY SHOWN A8 PUBLIC DEDICATIONS HEREON TO HE USE OF THE PUBLIC, DO HEREBY WAIVE N BEHALF OF THEATSELVES AND T4EIR SUCCE850R61N INTEREST ALL CL/JAB FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF YAKIMA AND ANY OTHER DOVF34NMENTAL AUTHORITY WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED TO THE ADJACENT LAND BY THE ESTABLISHED CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID DEDICATED ROADS AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY: 1413 001EREBY GRANT AND RESERVE TIE EASEMENTS A8 SHOWN HEREON FOR THE USES INDICATED.* STATE OF WASH COJNIYOF YAKIMA SS ON THS 31 DAY ON Y 20oL BEFORE ME APPEARED JAMES D. FINKEL AND SHELLY A FICKE1., HUSBAND -AND WIFE, AHO W11TATA J LYNCH, A SINGLE PERSON - - KNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(6) DESCRIBED W 1 WHO EXECUTED HE FOREGOING ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT 14E(6HE FR EY161GNE° T11E GAME A6 HIBMER (T VOLUMARY ACT 141 PURPOSES MY 0008 THEREIN MENTIONED. IN W O6ET MY TREASURERS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY HAT ALL CHARGEABI E REGULAR & SPECIAL. ASSESSMENTS COLLECTIBLE 8Y THIS SFFICE HAVE BEEN THAT 80FlWOON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON, ON THIS DATE OF CERTI DA • • T16S1_ DAY OF 4', // !/ L /Y MAC• 7 TREAS• "63FPTr"E APPROVAL APPROVED 8Y TIE CITY OF YAKIMA GATE 4Y / f "THE ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE OF RECORDING, BUT MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE TIE CITY OF YAKIMA BUILDING CODES DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONFIRMATION OR REASSIGNMENT OF AGGRESSES AT THE TIME OF WILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.' CO©© lir S 11aC0 6d4/(:ONSLJI TING ENGINEERS SCALE. 1"-50' 25' INTERVALS BASIS OF BEARING. FAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 22 TWP13 N, RANGE 18 AS 8E110 N 00°25'00" W (ASSUMED) MONUMENTATION VISITED 5/2002 SURVEY METHOD; FIELD TRAVERSE W/LIETZ/SOKKISKA 501.43FR10 OREPRESENTS 3/8" REBAR/CAP SET FLUSH WITH CAP 5831 'REPRESENTS REBAR/CAP FOUND SHORT PLAT PARCEL No. 181322-140C SCALE: 1"-50' DATE; DAV. 2002 DRAWN 013 JUA FOR: JAMES & SHELLY FICKEL AND WILLIAM LYNC R E 1P l._ AT $H Bl M .AMI AD ID ITI OI�I .liC liva (.1:15 L'7 .7u9./1i ..e ..n Yfl tS f•./1 �< a, SE:C. 22 TWR 03 N. RGEE. 18 E.W.M. YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Scale: 1'• loo' DEDICATION Knew All Man 0y T6.a. P..aanta. TAa1 . • 1.mae/ 3Au,,' n 1. Oed/o Shuman, 4w6and Gwife, are the oereer.1 of the fol/o./...1 40412:624 0,,prrt4 , Th. Nil/4 4232' of the Sud% 346.42 of !he W.4/ 69S/ of /he Earl 031.,'2 of IA.- of Arof Sac 22, nor /34/, Roe /4 8WAI Eg.sp/ /he West 20' /h..ruf ter 9//h A.. Ms east So' •f Leqf3 alk 1 flare 3/4,1,01, and the No./A. 25' 0/ 1he Sour% 423.22 a/ inc 084' Ice Osd2.snon /roe /. f, cep/ the Wool 20' /4.,r.f for 35/4. 3.0 f , /%e !0 1/3 4e 6aoinnino at the .1F. Coa of Lot 4218 / f/aro FOd,t,on /hence /02 4 Jo./A 1/.e /1.y 01,001/4a < rre .v4ote Rad.oa :4150 4./6'46' to /ha AT. of 1412 1u. • /h.1/., 04x23 171-1/'Watt 2116' to /40 1'C. ofa <t-/r•w .944.12 12 300' 4. /4' 44' 14¢1/1. 2..14-.002120/y d.recLm aro/ d t..4 car •4.4 lance ./ 626' ,o /h. pT of aa.d 21,10. /421,10 101/4 09'33' Eaa/ 95.6' e. the 3.2. c... of the f,.2d shore 402,1,''3d !fact; thence Nott). 4212' to 70 n/ 0f 421..00...3, 4/10 .,.,,. ting /he Weat /4o' of ohs Na./k /50 •r 44,00 de .11C ....I. ad tract. Thal .vehave caused the dame to bee .surveyed and rep/ailed 141.0 /ears and street) as shogun on the a//ached Plat, to be known as rtEPLAT SWUMAN ADDITION- and we do hereby dedicate the .free/: to the pub/ie use forever 1n acrardonee with the Stn/wter of the State of Washington ,n such carat made and provided; and we hereby reserve the earrmen IV 0'4 shown, for p..bt'C uti/.t/eJ /n W,Iners whereof we have hereunto Jet ow- hands and Sea/ of.eill__/9 9 A C IKA IDW IL EC ID G IC I'I [ IN T State of Worhnyt'on)SS C unty of Yakima JJ On this 1 day of _ _ 19-_ persona//y appeared before inc Rachel Shuman, a .pinrter, Samuel Shuman and Della Shuman. husband and wife, known tee be the individuals in and who executed the within instrument and .acknow/ed9.d Jaid lnsfrument robe their free and varunfary het and deed for the uses, and pu pores therein m eotion ed. F1,/nes/ my hood and officio// Jra/. the day and year first above Fviteen '0/02/ /1.64, ,o on0rar,h. l/o.•. of.✓a,4.nr/a.. rel. ler a1______—_Na/ .apron / hereby Certify enc.', all taxer on the /have di/cr,b.d,property /.lave been paid, up 50 and Inch/ding the year /'50, 1t1®1'ItOdfdll_ S Approved by the P/ann,ny Co,nm.rr,on of '4o City of YaAima. Chairman 01 /4404nirr/a4 Approved by the City Englne.r of /he Ci/y of YaAlma, Waahinglon 1144_ Lek_ of�ar est _ _ - City Engineer 7. - In Approved by the Crty Conniya.rse.on of the Cry of Yak,nra. ,yro.� ^ ., ' r.. �W�af'h, 9lon thir__,c¢-day af_.,.�39.0 / . '• 413"4 1dan Engineering Seryl,'— •`,, yti9`Atf.d L{,u�,i :,, -/ .__ _. tortsnye�a_— W0/15,40ton Yakima Title E8crow Affiliate of First Amencan Title Insurance Company June 30, 2003 Yakima County Auditor Yakima, WA We hereby certify that we have examined the title to the property covered by the attached Plat of Summitview Vineyards and hereby certify that the parties executing said plat are the only parties required to sign said plat in accordance with applicable statute. Yakima Title and Escrow Del Rawlins 120 North Naches Avenue • P.O. Box 489 • Yakima, WA 98907-0489 Telephone (509) 248-7550 • FAX (509) 248-2319 Yakima County YAK/MA COUNTY TREASURER Ilene Thomson, County Treasurer Donna J. Devine, Assistant Treasurer Date: June 30, 2003 Parcel Number(s): 181322-14493, -14494, -14495, -14496, -14497 & 181322-14515 TO: TAXPAYER/OWNER The above parcel(s) is considered the "parent" parcel and is involved in a property segregation (subdivision) and/or merge. Due to the required processes of these tax roll modifications, property taxes and benefit assessments may c ontinue to be c ertified to the " parent" p ar cel(s) u ntii t he final s tep wherein the County Assessor completes the segregation or merge for tax roll purposes. Note: Taxes and assessments due after the signing of the attached plat are due as certified to the County Treasurer's Office and cannot be redistributed to the newly -created tax records (parcels) at a later date. Those taxes and assessments are due and payable on the above parcels if certified to them. Tax bilis will continue to be sent to the taxpayer -of -record of t he " parent" parcel(s) if taxes and assessments continue to be certified in that manner pending tax roll updates. As taxpayer/owner, , you also may request a Segregation Value Certification from the Assessor's Office. The SVC w ill show you the tax amounts for each of the resulting "child" parcels. This does not apply to benefit assessments, however. If you have any questions, please contact our Tax Division staff at 509-574-2800, ILENE THOMSON YAKIMA COUNTY TREASURER by (01/2000) 128 North Second Street, Room 115 ® PO Box 22530 • Yakima, WA 98907-2530 Phone: 509-574-2800 s FAX: 509-574-2801 www.co.yakima.wa.us/treasurer/treasurer CITY OF YAKIMA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 2003 TO: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner FROM: Kevin Callow, Development Engineer RE: SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS final plat. In accordance with the conditions of approval of this preliminary plat, all lots within this subdivision are served by City water and by City sewer. The water and sewer system constructed within this development have been accepted into the City systems. The only construction item remaining to be completed is the street Tight installation. The City Engineer has sufficient cash deposit from the developer to guarantee this complete installation. All other conditions have been satisfied. BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 1 (o For Meeting Of Nov. 5, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Closed Record Public Hearing concerning the Preliminary Plat of Summitview Vineyards, submitted,Tby Jim Fickel, developer. SUBMITTED BYtkIJIFiltiam R Cook, Director of Community and Economic Development CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, 575-6042 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Summitview Vineyards is a 17 -lot preliminary subdivision of approximately 4.5 acres of vacant R-1 and R-2 zoned property. Also included with this application is a Class (2) request to build duplexes within the R-1 zoning district, an administrative adjustment to reduce the rear yard setback within the R-1 zone from 20 feet to 15 feet and a right-of-way vacation petition to vacate the unbuilt portion of N 33rd Avenue that crosses this property. This property is located on the west side of N 32nd Avenue approximately 400 feet north of the intersection with Summitview Avenue (218 N 32"d Avenue.) As submitted this application complies with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Development Standards Ordinance and Traffic Concurrency Ordinance. On September 12, 2002 the Hearing Examiner conducted an open record public hearing to consider this application. During this hearing the applicant withdrew his request for a reduction of the rear yard setback standard of the R-1 zoning district. On October 3, 2002 the Hearing Examiner issued his written recommendation for approval of this application subject to conditions. As a part of this recommendation duplexes are to be permitted within the R-1 zoning district but dwelling unit density is to be maintained at the R-1 standard of seven dwelling units per net residential acre. Resolution _ Ordinance_ Contract _ Other Hearing Examiner's recommendation Funding Source APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: J anager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation and direct legal staff to prepare the appropriate legislation. BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Examiner recommends approval of the preliminary subdivision and right-of-way vacation subject to conditions and modifies the provision to build duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of this property. COUNCIL ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's recommendation was accepted. DEPARTMENT UF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVtLOPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO THE YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL On October 3, 2002 the Yakima Hearing Examiner rendered his recommendation on the Preliminary Long Plat Master Application submitted by Mr. Jim Fickel. The proposed 17 -lot Plat of Summitview Vineyards is located in the vicinity of 218 North 32nd Avenue, Yakima, Washington. The application was reviewed at a public hearing held by the Hearing Examiner on September 12, 2002. A copy of the Hearing Examiner's Findings and Recommendation is enclosed. The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation will be considered by the Yakima City Council in a Public Hearing to be scheduled. The City Clerk will notify you of the date, time and place of the public hearing. For further information or assistance you may contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, City of Yakima Planning Division located on the 2nd floor of Yakima City Hall, (129 North Second Street), 575-6042. Doug Maples Planning and Code Administration Manager Date of mailing: October 11, 2002 Enclosures In the Matter of the Applications by Jim Fickei For the Summit -view inevarric i .nng Subdivision, Class (2) review of Duplex Development in the R-1 Zone, Administrative Adjustment of Setback Requirements, and Right of Way Vacation City File Nos. Pre -Plat #2-02, UAZO CL(2)#22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02 HEARING EXAMINER'S PN('(ili/iljfl NTlAT.1"N No. IU02-4-12 RECEIVED OCT O b 2D02 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Jim Fickel submitted a master application comprising applications for the (1) long subdivision of 4.5 acres located on the west side of N 32nd Avenue north of Summitview Avenue, (2) zoning review for construction of duplexes in the R-1 Zone, (3) adjustment to the rear setback standard applicable in the R-1 Zone, and (4) vacation of the platted, undeveloped right of way for N. 33`' Avenue After public notice, the City of Yakima issued a Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. No appeals of the DNS were filed. The Hearing Examiner visited the site on September 11, 2002, and conducted an open record land use review hearing on September 12, 2002 Summary of Recommendation: The Plat of Summitview Vineyards, the application for vacation of the N. 33'1 Avenue right of way within the platted area, and the application construction of duplexes in the R-1 zoning district should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS set forth more fully below, including limitation on density of residential development in the R-1 zoning district. From the site visit, a review of the staff report and other exhibits, information received at the hearing, and a review of Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the subject application, the Hearing Examiner makes the following HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 1 FINDINGS 1. Applicant. Jim Fickel, 221 S 19th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 2. Owners. Jim Fickel and Bill Lynch 3. Location. This property is located on the west side of N 32nd Avenue, approximately 400 feet north of the intersection with Summitview Avenue. 4. Parcel Numbers. 181322-14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497, 14515 5. Application. Preliminary long subdivision of 4.5 acres into 17 residential lots and associated applications. 6. Current zoning and Land Use._The current zoning for the N. 33rd Avenue right- of-way and property to the east is R-2, two-family residential. The zoning for the property to the west of the N. 33rd Avenue right-of-way is R-1, single-family residential. At the time of hearing, the subject property was vacant except for an old shed. 7. Property description. The subject property comprises six existing lots. It was earlier used for a fruit orchard. The Department of Ecology has noted the possibility of soil contamination on the property due to that earlier agricultural use. It also includes a platted but largely undeveloped right of way for the northward extension of N. 33rd Avenue from the terminus of the street's current extension off of Summitview Avenue to the southern boundary of the subject property. The developed portion of N. 33rd Avenue stops abruptly at the south boundary of the subject property The northern end of the platted right of way is evidenced by a curb cut on Jefferson Avenue and graveled southern extension that stops at a large tree roughly at the centerline. The eastern -most lot fronts on N. 32nd Avenue, but has no road approach. Otherwise, the property is bounded on all sides by the back lot lines of single family residences. Various degrees of fencing and vegetation screening have been developed on the back lot lines. The subject property slopes slightly upward east to west, affording a modest view to the east from the single family residences on the west boundary line. All municipal services are available to the property. Irrigation water is available through the Jefferson Irrigation System, which has an easement on the property. 8. Project description. The proposal is to subdivide the six existing lots into 17 new lots ranging in size from approximately 7,000 to 9,500 square feet. Within the plat HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 2 there will be five lots that are zoned R-1 and the remaining 12 lots are zoned R-2 The existing undeveloped right-of-way for N. 33rd Avenue would be vacated. The vacated ROW would be replaced with a newly aligned ROW for a north/south road ending in a cul-de-sac The applicant proposes to dedicate a new east/west road intersecting with N 32nd Avenue and interconnecting with the realigned N. 33rd Avenue ROW at a point immediately to the west of the proposed cul-de-sac. Thus the development could be entered from two points served by different arterials. Duplexes would be built upon the five R-1 zoned lots. The applicant states an intent to construct duplexes on the R-2 lots as well. Modifications to the project proposed at the open record hearing. The applicant initially requested an administrative adjustment that would reduce the rear yard setback for the five R-1 lots from 20 feet to 15 feet. The applicant orally withdrew the application for the administrative adjustment at the open record hearing. Also at hearing, the applicant declared that the duplexes in the R-1 would be limited to one story in height, and that a six-foot fence would be installed on the same lots' rear lot lines where no similarly effective screening was already present. The withdrawal of the administrative adjustment request and height limitation and fencing declarations were i%.« �� r.... lA 9'i 9 9 T 1 duplex offered as mitigation for concerns about compatibility between the R-1 duplex development and the rear lot line neighbors. 9. Environmental Review. On August 22, 2002 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Yakima. This DNS was issued under WAC 197-11-355 No appeals were filed within the five-day appeal period. 10. Notices. Public notice of the application and hearing was provided in accordance with. YMC Title 14, Subdivision Ordinance; YMC Title 15, Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 6.88, Environmental Policy and YMC Title 16, Development Permit Regulations. 11. Analysis. Each of the elements of the master application is subject to different review criteria. The subdivision, Class (2) review, and vacation of the right of way are each analyzed in turn below. The administrative adjustment application is not analyzed because of the applicant's declaration at hearing that the adjustment request was withdrawn. HEARING EXAMINER RECONEVIENDAT JON - 3 a. Subdivision review. The criteria to be applied in making a recommendation on an application for a subdivision are set out in YMC 14.20.100. The proposed subdivision must be consistent with the provisions of the comprehensive plan, the urban area zoning ordinance, and the subdivision ordinance Appropriate provisions are also to be made for public health, safety, and general welfare, open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, irrigation and other water suppliers, sanitary waste disposal, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks, and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. See RCW 58.17.110. To recommend approval of a subdivision application, the hearing examiner must find that the public use and interest will be served by the approval of this subdivision. Consistency with the comprehensive plan. Future Land Use map III -3 of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan (YUACP) designates the larger potion of the subject property as Medium Density Residential and the smaller westerly portion as Low Density Residential. The subdivision application provides for the subdivision of the subject property into lots that are of a size similar to other lots in the vicinity See YUACP Policy G9.3 (p.II-13). It contemplates extension of roadways and utilities into the property to provide municipal services customary in urban residential neighborhoods. The principal question that arises in applying this criterion is the consistency of the subdivision with the transportation and traffic -related elements of the YUACP The proposal would alter the point of ingress to the interior of the subject property. YUACP Policy G4.5 (p. II.8) mandates the integration of subdivisions into the collector and arterial system. However, the purpose of the integration is to assure connectivity There appears to be no material difference in connectivity between the proposed street layout in the preliminary plat and the current intersection of the N. 33rd Avenue ROW with Jefferson. Perhaps more importantly, YUACP Objective T3 and associated policies provide for consideration of traffic safety and congestion in the design of new development. Residents of N. 33rd Avenue state that they have difficulty entering Summitview during periods of high-volume traffic. In addition, the intersection with Summitview Avenue is HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 4 seasonally hazardous because of the grade of N. 33rd as it approaches the arterial in combination with unplowed snow. They believe that the hazards would be worse with traffic generated by the development of the lots within the subdivision. Other public comments indicate that N. 32nd Avenue is substandard. Nevertheless, the transportation capacity analysis indicates that the development of the subdivision will not exhaust the capacity of the arterials, In addition there is no evidence that there is anything unique about the intersection with respect to waiting time during high traffic periods. With respect to winter conditions, the access to N. 32nd Avenue will provide an alternative to battling unplowed snow on the approach to Summitview for current N. 33rd Avenue residents and subdivision residents alike. There is no evidence that the subdivision of the property will unacceptably detract from accomplishing the transportation goals and objectives of the YUACP. Furthermore, based on lot size, the subdivision furthers various other goals and objectives set out in the plan including: (1) Goal H1- Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices. (2) Objective HI.2- Encourage a range of affordable home ownership options. (3) Policy H1.2 - Facilitate small lot sizes, manufactured housing on single family lots, condominiums, clustering and other options that increase the supply of afordabie home ownership options. Consistency with the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance regulates land uses. The mere subdivision of the property into lots amenable to residential development in an area zoned for residential development is consistent with the zoning ordinance, presuming that the land itself is suitable for residential development. In this case, the land has no features that make it unsuitable for residential development. Subdivision design standards and other requirements are set out in Tables 5-1 and 5-2 of the ordinance. A review of the preliminary plat against the standards and requirements shows it to be consistent. There is no evidence that the subdivision is inconsistent with any provision of the zoning ordinance The compliance of the proposed duplex development in the R-1 zone with zoning ordinance requirements is analyzed later in this recommendation. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 5 Consistency with the subdivision ordinance. The purposes of the subdivision ordinance include protection and preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by Chapter 58.17 RCW, to prevent overcrowding land; to lessen congestion in the streets and highways; to promote effective use of land; to promote safe and convenient travel by the public on streets and highways, to provide for adequate light and air; to facilitate adequate provision for water, sewerage, utilities, drainage, parks and recreation areas, sites for schools and school grounds and other public requirements; and to provide for proper ingress and egress. These factors are analyzed below. It should be noted that preliminary plats must contain certain information not included on the documents submitted with the master application. In particular, a plat map including information required by YMC 14.20 050A, -C, -F, -I, and -J, was not included in the staff report or among the other exhibits. These omissions do not appear prejudicial, since subdivision approval can be conditioned upon the necessary dedications, and slope issues are not significant on the property. Conformity with RCW 58.17.110. For the most part, the statutory criteria are adequately addressed by the preliminary plat or by operation of the development regulations. Generally, utilities are available in the area and may be readily extended through the platted easements. Irrigation water is available, and an easement must be dedicated to allow irrigation water delivery to all the designated lots. The subject property is within the Yakima School District, which provided no comment suggesting any school -related issues. Parks and recreation issues are dealt with on a citywide basis through the YUACP and the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. Open space is addressed through the application of subdivision development standards. Street and sidewalk designs are addressed by design standards established in Title 12 of the Yakima Municipal Code. The on-site platted streets must consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue must be barrier curb. The cul-de-sac must be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right-of-way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 6 Public safety requires that street naming and lot addressing be integrated with the naming system applied to other streets. The preliminary plat indicates that the east -west street would be named Vineyard Way. Public safety requires that the street be designated as Folsom Avenue, consistent with the city's street naming system Finally in regard to RCW 58.17.110 and YMC 14.20.100, a subdivision may be recommended if it is in the public interest. The subdivision will further housing goals and objectives set forth in the YUACP. It will do so consistently with the traffic and transportation elements of the plan. It complies with subdivision standards, and so long as any issues of incompatibility are resolved in zoning review, it is consistent with the public interest. b Right of way vacation. The City is authorized to vacate platted rights of way by state law (Chapter 35.79 RCW). Right of way vacation is not a regulatory action, and is not addressed by regulations. Rather, the process is designed to assure public awareness of the proposed vacation, protection of public access to properties adjacent to the right of way, and appropriate recovery of public investments in streets acquired and developed through expenditure of public funds Based on these considerations, rights of way may be vacated by ordinance. Neither state law nor ordinances require the vacation to affirmatively serve a public purpose. Nevertheless, city policy requires that a request for vacation state the public benefits offered by the vacation. In this case, the vacation is tied to the subdivision of property and is effectively a rerouting of the right of way. The principal public benefit of the vacation is that it will foster the subdivision development in a manner consistent with YUACP in -filling and housing goals. It is clear that the applicant's purpose is to maximize the number of lots in the subdivision through rerouting the right of way. That objective is not inconsistent with the public interest, so long as the zoning standards are satisfied No public benefit at all is being realized from the currently undeveloped right of way The development includes construction of streets and sidewalks where none now exist, and provide connectivity ofN 33rd Avenue to the city transportation grid rather than leaving it as a dead end. Current residents of N. 33rd Avenue do not view this connectivity as a benefit, since it brings with it the potential for more traffic from subdivision development. This concern is mitigated by the connection of the DARING EXAMINER RECOMivfENDATION - 7 development through Folsom Avenue to N. 32nd Avenue, which is classified as an arterial street. There is no evidence that the connection of N. 33rd Avenue all the way through to Jefferson is somehow preferable as a matter of public interest. All property owners with lands abutting the targeted portion of the right of way agree with the vacation. No existing access to other properties is lost. City Resolution #D-5630 specifies the requirements for compensating the City for rights-of-way when vacated. The existing platted right-of-way for N 33`d Avenue, over and across this property, has never been constructed. Consequently, in accordance with Resolution D- #5630, no compensation should be required for this vacation. c. Class (2) review. Since proposed lots 13 through 17 and part of lot 12 are within the R-1 zone, the applicant seeks Class (2) review of the development of duplexes on those lots. As Class (2) uses, duplexes are generally permitted throughout the R-1 district. However, review is required in order to promote compatibility with the intent and character of the district and the objectives of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan. See YMC 15 02.020 (definition of Class (2) uses) Consistency of the proposed use with the YUACP. Consistency of the preliminary plat with the YUACP was analyzed in the previous section. However, the specific consistency of the R-1 duplex development with the YUACP must be considered. The YUACP establishes categories of residential uses based on density. The property proposed for the five duplexes in categorized as Low Density Residential. Such property is characterized as primarily single family detached residences, with a density of seven dwelling units per acre or less. Development of a parcel of such property into duplexes is in tension with the preferred future of the property. Adding to the tension is the objective of stabilizing and preserving neighborhoods. On the other hand, duplexes would foster affordable housing goals. Affordable housing goals are also in tension with the preferred future use These tensions can be reconciled by the proposition that residential areas within the city are specifically assigned to density categories, and affordable housing goals are not property specific. The specific guidance should prevail over competing general guidance Therefore, the proposed density on the five lots would be inconsistent with the YUACP HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 8 In addition, based on the guidance in the YUACP, "compatibility of new development must remain a principal focus of decision-making" when weighing competing values Moderate Density Residential use (which includes duplex development) is generally compatible with Low Density Residential use where there is an interface of such uses. See YUACP p. III -7 (Land Use Compatibility Chart) Certainly the development of five duplexes on lots adjacent to R-2 property does not present questions of incompatibility with the R-2 lots. In this case, though, the practical effect of duplex development would be to create a new interface or carve a portion out of the Low Density Residential area. The concentration of five duplexes in single family residential area differs in levels of activity and visual effect from the scattered presence of a few duplexes within a neighborhood. Therefore, the development may be said to affect the single family residential character of the neighborhood. A view from N. 33rd Avenue of five obvious, essentially identical duplexes in a row might make a reasonable reviewer question whether the density designation of the property in the YUACP had any meaning. Does the development of duplexes on the five lots in itself present other incompatibility with neighboring uses? Public comment raised concerns about the rental use of the duplexes. The fact that duplexes may he rented does not affect the customary attributes of the single family neighborhoods, because any house may be converted to a rental property. Accordingly, while the condition of rental properties may affect neighborhood property values, that proposition holds for rental houses as well as duplexes. The N. 33rd Avenue neighbors are also concerned about congestion produced 68 vehicles within the subdivision. That, however, is the point of promoting the transportation grid, and the options for ingress and egress mitigate congestion issues. Furthermore, with respect to the five lots in question, there is no evidence that the potential for ten vehicles in addition to the ten vehicles that would be produced from single family detached residences on the lots would lead to significantly greater (and thus incompatible) congestion. As discussed above however, the level of activity in the area resulting from the duplex development in the area is not consistent with the preferred single family residential character preferred in the YUACP. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 9 Several neighbors also commented with dismay on the potential for 35 -foot structures, since that is the structural height limitation in the district. Such structures would impair the aesthetic values in the territorial view the western neighbors enjoy on the property. Single story structures were less objectionable. The height limitation is less satisfactory to current neighbors on N. 33`d Avenue because of the issue of the concentration of the duplexes and the impact on neighborhood character. The applicant may be commended for addressing the compatibility concerns of the neighbors by limiting development to one-story structures and installing site screening fences on unscreened properties among the five lots, though the mitigation measures do not address the density conflicts. In short, the proposed density on the five Low Density Residential properties is not consistent with the YUACP This presents an unfortunate complexity in developing a recommendation on conditions of approval. It becomes necessary to recommend alternative conditions. One alternative is to limit development to a combination of single family residences and duplexes that results in a density below the seven dwelling units per acre standard in the YUACP. The other is to modify the Low Density Residential portion or the proposed plat into fewer lots so that the duplexes can be developed without exceeding the density threshold. The applicant is always free to pursue a YUACP amendment to change the designation and zoning of the subject lots. Compatibility with the intent and character of the R-1 district. The single-family residential district is intended to: a. Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single- family dwellings free from other uses except those which are compatible with, and serve the residents of, this district; and b. Locate moderate -density residential development, up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre, in areas served by public water and sewer. Detached single-family dwellings are the primary use in this district. The district is characterized by forty-five percent lot coverage; access to individual lots by local access streets; large front, rear and side yard setbacks, and one and two story structures. There is no argument that the proposed duplexes affirmatively serve the intent of the district. Given the compatibility analysis set out in the preceding paragraphs, the only HEARING EXAMINER RECOIVIIMIENDATION - 10 true conflict (given the mitigation proposed for the structures) presented by the Class (2) use, is in respect to density. The zoning ordinance carries forward the Low Density Residential concept in the intent statement for the R-1 district. Accordingly, the same density analysis applies to YUACP consistency and compatibility of the proposed use with the zoning district intent and character. From the foregoing findings, the Hearing Examiner makes the following CONCLUSIONS 1. Pursuant to Chapter 58.17 RCW, § 14.30.080 YMC and § 15.11.110 YMC, the Hearing Examiner is authorized to make a recommendation to the City Council on preliminary plats and Master Applications. 2. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the YUACP. 3. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision is consistent with subdivision design standards and other relevant provisions of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance 4. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision complies substantially with Title 14 YMC (the subdivision ordinance) though the preliminary plat information provided in the hearing exhibits does not contain certain information required by YMC 14.20.050. 5. Easements must be dedicated for the purpose of delivery of irrigation water to the lots within the subdivision. 6. The vacation of the current Right of Way for N. 33RD Avenue within the subject property protects necessary access to abutting properties due to its connection with the dedication of a new right of way as part of the subdivision process. 7. No compensation of the city should be required for the vacation of the undeveloped right of way. 8. All property owners of lands abutting the right of way proposed to be vacated support the vacation of the right of way HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 11 9 Vacation of the current N. 33rd Avenue right of way on the subject property is consistent with the public interest. 10 The construction of duplexes on all of Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 ("the R-1 block") is not consistent with residential density standards used in the YUACP or set out in YMC 15.03.030, since it would effectively convert a block of lots to moderate density use without benefit of legislative review 11. Appropriate densities on the R-1 block can be achieved by modifying the preliminary plat to reduce the number of lots or by providing a mixture of single family residences and duplexes on the currently proposed lots. 12. Construction of duplexes on the R-1 block that are limited to one story and which are screened by appropriate fencing would avoid any significant incompatibilities with the neighboring single family residential use. From the preceding findings and conclusions, the Hearing Examiner makes the following RECOMMENDATION The Plat of Summitview Vineyards, the application for vacation of the N. 33rd Avenue right of way within the platted area, and the application forconstruction of duplexes in the R-1 zoning district should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The City Engineer has agreed to a modification to this street design and to a deferment of the frontage improvements along N. 32nd Ave. A deferment agreement must be signed by the property owners, recorded and referenced on the face of the plat prior to plat recording. 2. On-site platted streets shall consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue should be barrier curbs. The cul-de-sac should be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right of way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. 3. All lots shall be provided with public water and public sewer service according to YMC Title 12 standards Prior to final plat approval written verification from the City of Yakima Engineering Division must be provided to the Planning Division HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 12 indicating that all water and sewer extensions have been completed or financially secured. 4. A minimum 8 -foot wide public utility easement must be provided adjacent to all public road rights-of-way. 5. Easements for new and/or future utilities shall be a minimum of 16 feet in width, provided that the width of easements for buried utilities will be twice the depth of the planned excavation. 6. All public and private utilities shall be located underground, with the exception of telephone boxes and such similar structures. 7 All public and private utilities to be located within public road rights-of- way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction. 8 Fire hydrants shall be placed at the locations specified by the Building Codes Division and Yakima Fire Department. Ail lots must be provided with adequate fire flow. 9. Irrigation easements shall be provided or maintained as specified by the City of Yakima Water & Irrigation Division. 10. The final plat shall substantially conform to the preliminary plat, as modified by the City Council, or as modified to allow duplex construction that results in residential development densities below seven dwelling units per net residential acre on properties zoned R-1 as of the date of final action by the City Council on the subject applications, or as otherwise modified herein. 11. All permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. The developer shall designate during working hours a responsible party to serve as contact for suspected air quality violations. 12. The developer shall contact the State Department of Ecology to determine if a baseline general permit for stormwater discharges will be necessary for this development. Application shall be made at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. Erosion control methods such as temporary ponding, silt fencing, etc must he in place prior to clearing, grading or construction. 13. All addresses shall be as specified by the City of Yakima Office of Code Administration. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 13 14 The final plat shall be subject to the following notes, which must be placed on the face of the plat: Lots 4 and 5 shall not have direct vehicular access onto N 32nd Avenue. Duplexes constructed on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 shall be no more than one story If duplexes are constructed on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, a six-foot view obscuring fence or equivalently effective vegetation screen shall be installed where no other screen exists between the lots and single family residences existing at the time of final plat filing. The addresses shown on this plat are accurate as of the date of recording, but may be subject to change. The City of Yakima Building Codes Division is responsible for the confirmation or reassignment of addresses at the time of building permit issuance. 15. Density of residential development on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 shall not exceed seven dwelling units per net residential acre. DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 20 411 PA,' '.SPURG�- HE, ' 1 G EXAMINER PRO 'Y ''' ORE HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 14 v RECEIV NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Summitview Vineyards Final Plat - 218 North 32nd Avenue JUL 2 3 2003 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Yakima City Council will conduct a Closed Record Public Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the 17 -lot final plat known as Summitview Vineyards, submitted by Jim Fickel. The property is located in the vicinity of 218 North 32nd Avenue, Yakima, WA. Said closed record public meeting will be held Tuesday, August 5, 2003 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible, in the Council Chambers at City Hall located at 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. All interested persons are invited to attend this closed record public hearing. Dated this 18th day of July, 2003 Karen S. Roberts City Clerk Mail: 7/22/03 r .a! `'� 1...111111 HE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS 9C 1/4. NE 1/4 Cf WW1 32.10WWW 13 NORM pia 18 E.wx MOW COMM 11o91a1C10M ,EFFEIMON INENJE PR r /i4 /M —g ��fx ----- _---------- 2 10 3 1 VICHTY HAP w 11/9611106 t/>�t onorP47N - FORMS Nss. v rrt was' V. Vim OH VP! KP--// vv. mu 1r =Mlle IMAM . I wave va IOW asraw—N. OaHa /aa tfH. Ni IN NRr R - 1 EMerA 12"9 MOIL - uMa:.4•VM 9p!lS•S jrva'1'1'$u'Mja.ma aM MOCK - Nta-e«.0 p-VIL- foal-" nom - alaNafn NOM- Mas/ -faro ktr�w"+i�+iiHaNMOW! VIM. COMM sways atu®MI sur Guar. sa r aafwM. awes rfsm wt - - -�HWRW 1 R — 1 avTvf R-- 1 r ifv1Gf1E PPE MR/ • MINER 1.101 con DW OM or Kamm OA [aN AFM'. N s a IIS !®Oafs OWN M=Re ounce WW1= (JW MAHa1rs 1112 N® 7049407 XX& f's.311/ MI MOMS 0 a l� LINCOLN AVE 1:. II —' � ..•...r I co: N w 1 EFFERSON AVE SUMMITVIEW AVENUE ISY N WAV nae rust AV LINCOLN AVENUE N 31ST AWN J SUMMITVIEW AVENU 1 - BARGE STREET x 0 O (0 CANTERS CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Information Services - GIS NILE NO: R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJ10-02 APPLICANT: JIM FICKEL REQUEST: VACATE PORTION R/W ON 33RD AVE, 17 LOT LONG PLT, CONSTRUCT DUPLEXES, ADJUST SEI"BACKS LOCATION: VIC. OF N. 33RD AVE. & JEFFERSON Scale -lin = 400ft 0 NES 200 400 Subject Property Zoning Boundary Yakima City Limits DENT4C3-02 07/11/02 1NUt.X D o_ Priscilla Don «. riis..aii . Pauueiiu i 3301 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Debbie Lewis 227 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Chuck Roster 3207 W. Nob Hill Blvd Yakima, WA. 98902-4960 Bob & Rhinda Clem 221 No. 32nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 William B. Petri 3211 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Bill Lynch 5511 Glacier Way Yakima, WA 98908 Dale Johnson 3310 Jefferson Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Luther, Patricia, Anna & Patty Carey NO ADDRESS GIVEN, NOT IN PHONE BOOK Cindy Noble NFRD 5609 W. Arlington Ave. Yakima, WA 98908 Tu iickel 221 So. 19th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Dennis McCullough 224 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902-2273 Vem R. Peterson 213 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Steve Sutliff 219 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Robert & Virginia Braden 225 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Furl & Donnajean Barton 223 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Michael J. & Karen Roberts 212 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Ray & Blanche Hoff 209 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Pedro & Tracy Arastequi 3212 Jefferson Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Bill iiordan 410 No. 2nd Street Yakima, WA. 98901 Alison A. Roy 215 No. 33rd Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Dennis Martin 3204 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 John- Andriotti 305 No. 6th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Alfred & Inez Mabry 211 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Paulin° &�'ilvio Gonzalez A KK11ddV.LJl Y1K V Vilde Kll+Lr 3402 Snmmitview Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Thomas & Helen Lamberton 214 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Ella Cruze 216 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Matt & Joy Peterson 3302 Jefferson Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 4g., For Meeting of August 5. 2003 ITEM TITLE: Public Meeting to consider the final plat of Summitview Vineyards. SUBMITTED BY: William R. Cook, Director of Community & Economic Development CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, 575-6042 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Summitview Vineyards is a 16 -lot long plat located on the west side of N 321tl Avenue approximately mid point between Summitview and Lincoln Avenues. In open Council session on June 18, 2002 the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve this preliminary plat was accepted and preliminary plat approval was granted subject to conditions. Except for streetlights, which have been secured by the developer, the City Engineer's office has inspected and accepted all required improvements and in affirmation of this fact the acting City Engineer has signed the plat. The Planning Division has likewise reviewed the final plat and finds it to be in substantial conformance with the terms and conditions of the preliminary approval and the Subdivision Administrator has also signed the plat. YMC 14.20210 sets forth the following process for final plat approval. A. Upon receipt of a proposed final plat, the City Council shall at its next public meeting set a date for consideration of the final plat. Notice of the date, time, and location of the public meeting shall be given to the subdivision applicant, Surveyor, City Engineer, Office of Environmental Planning, and the Yakima County Health Officer at least four days prior to the date of the public meeting. B. The City Council shall review the final plat during the public meeting and shall approve the final plat if the Council determines that the final plat conforms to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and applicable state laws and meets the requirements of this title as they existed when the preliminary plat was approved. C. Upon approving any final plat, the City Council shall authorize the Mayor to sign the final plat as evidence of City Council approval. (Ord. 98-65 § 2 (part), 1998). Staff recommends Council's approval of the final plat together with the adoption of the accompanying resolution that will authorize the Mayor to sign the plat. Resolution X Ordinance_ Contract _ Other (Specify) Final Plat Staff Report, Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, Final Plat Diagram Funding Source APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: City)t anagen STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the final plat. BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Hearing Examiner recommended plat approval on November 5, 2002. COUNCIL ACTION: JIM FICKEL THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS EXHIBIT LIST City Council Public Hearing November 5, 2002 Table of Contents CHAPTER AA Hearing Examiner's Recommendation CHAPTER A Staff Report CHAPTER B Maps / Site Plan CHAPTER C DST (Development Services Team) Comments CHAPTER D SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) review CHAPTER E Comment letters received CHAPTER F Applications CHAPTER G Notices 1, JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Exhibit List CHAPTER AA Hearing Examiner's Recommendation EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE AA -1 Hearing Examiner's Recommendation 10-09-02- In the Matter of the Applications by Jim Fickel For the Summitview Vineyards Long Subdivision, Class (2) review of Duplex Development in the R-1 Zone, Administrative Adjustment of Setback Requirements, and Right of Way Vacation City File Nos. Pre -Plat #2-02, UAZO CL(2)#22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02 RECEIVED HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION OCT 0 9 2002 iTY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV, No. I1102-4-12 Jim Fickel submitted a master application comprising applications for the (1) long subdivision of 4.5 acres located on the west side of N 32nd Avenue north of Summitview Avenue, (2) zoning review for construction of duplexes in the R-1 Zone, (3) adjustment to the rear setback standard applicable in the R-1 Zone, and (4) vacation of the platted, undeveloped right of way for N. 33rd Avenue After public notice, the City of Yakima issued a Determination of Nonsignificance pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. No appeals of the DNS were filed. The Hearing Examiner visited the site on September 11, 2002, and conducted an open record land use review hearing on September 12, 2002. Summary of Recommendation: The Plat of Summitview Vineyards, the application for vacation of the N 33rd Avenue right of way within the platted area, and the application construction of duplexes in the R-1 zoning district should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS set forth more fully below, including liniitation on density of residential development in the R-1 zoning district. From the site visit, a review of the staff report and other exhibits, information received at the hearing, and a review of Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the subject application, the Hearing Examiner makes the following HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 1 Filed Hearing Examiner EXH / ' - , Dab e-11-02- . Filet Mw VA C.. .#-3- 02_ FINDINGS 1. Applicant. Jim Fickel, 221 S. 19th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 2. Owners. Jim Fickel and Bill Lynch 3. Location. This property is located on the west side of N. 32nd Avenue, approximately 400 feet north of the intersection with Summitview Avenue. 4. Parcel Numbers. 181322-14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497, 14515. 5. Application. Preliminary long subdivision of 4.5 acres into 17 residential lots and associated applications. 6. Current zoning and Land Use._The current zoning for the N 33rd Avenue right- of-way and property to the east is R-2, two-family residential The zoning for the property to the west of the N. 33rd Avenue right-of-way is R-1, single-family residential. At the time of hearing, the subject property was vacant except for an old shed. 7. Property description. The subject property comprises six existing lots. It was earlier used for a fruit orchard. The Department of Ecology has noted the possibility of soil contamination on the property due to that earlier agricultural use. It also includes a platted but largely undeveloped right of way for the northward extension of N. 33rd Avenue from the terminus of the street's current extension off of Summitview Avenue to the southern boundary of the subject property The developed portion of N. 33rd Avenue stops abruptly at the south boundary of the subject property. The northern end of the platted right of way is evidenced by a curb cut on Jefferson Avenue and graveled southern extension that stops at a large tree roughly at the centerline. The eastern -most lot fronts on N. 32nd Avenue, but has no road approach. Otherwise, the property is bounded on all sides by the back lot lines of single family residences. Various degrees of fencing and vegetation screening have been developed on the back lot lines. The subject property slopes slightly upward east to west, affording a modest view to the east from the single family residences on the west boundary line. All municipal services are available to the property. Irrigation water is available through the Jefferson Irrigation System, which has an easement on the property. 8. Project description. The proposal is to subdivide the six existing lots into 17 new lots ranging in size from approximately 7,000 to 9,500 square feet. Within the plat HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 2 there will be five lots that are zoned R-1 and the remaining 12 lots are zoned R-2. The existing undeveloped right-of-way for N 33rd Avenue would be vacated. The vacated ROW would be replaced with a newly aligned ROW for a north/south road ending in a cul-de-sac. The applicant proposes to dedicate a new east/west road intersecting with N. 32nd Avenue and interconnecting with the realigned N 33rd Avenue ROW at a point immediately to the west of the proposed cul-de-sac. Thus the development could be entered from two points served by different arterials. Duplexes would be built upon the five R-1 zoned lots. The applicant states an intent to construct duplexes on the R-2 lots as well. Modifications to the project proposed at the open record hearing. The applicant initially requested an administrative adjustment that would reduce the rear yard setback for the five R-1 lots from 20 feet to 15 feet. The applicant orally withdrew the application for the administrative adjustment at the open record hearing. Also at hearing, the applicant declared that the duplexes in the R-1 would be limited to one story in height, and that a six-foot fence would be installed on the same lots' rear lot lines where no similarly effective screening was already present. The withdrawal of the administrative adjustment request and height limitation and fencing declarations were offered as mitigation for concerns about compatibility between the R-1 duplex development and the rear lot line neighbors. 9. Environmental Review. On August 22, 2002 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Yakima. This DNS was issued under WAC 197-11-355. No appeals were filed within the five-day appeal period. 10. Notices. Public notice of the application and hearing was provided in accordance with: YMC Title 14, Subdivision Ordinance; YMC Title 15, Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 6 88, Environmental Policy and YMC Title 16, Development Permit Regulations 11. Analysis. Each of the elements of the master application is subject to different review criteria. The subdivision, Class (2) review, and vacation of the right of way are each analyzed in turn below. The administrative adjustment application is not analyzed because of the applicant's declaration at hearing that the adjustment request was withdrawn. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 3 a. Subdivision review. The criteria to be applied in making a recommendation on an application for a subdivision are set out in YMC 14.20.100. The proposed subdivision must be consistent with the provisions of the comprehensive plan, the urban area zoning ordinance, and the subdivision ordinance. Appropriate provisions are also to be made for public health, safety, and general welfare, open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, irrigation and other water suppliers, sanitary waste disposal, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, sidewalks, and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. See RCW 58.17.110. To recommend approval of a subdivision application, the hearing examiner must find that the public use and interest will be served by the approval of this subdivision. Consistency with the comprehensive plan. Future Land Use map III -3 of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan (YUACP) designates the larger potion of the subject property as Medium Density Residential and the smaller westerly portion as Low Density Residential. The subdivision application provides for the subdivision of the subject property into lots that are of a size similar to other lots in the vicinity. See YUACP Policy G9.3 (p II -13). It contemplates extension of roadways and utilities into the property to provide municipal services customary in urban residential neighborhoods. The principal question that arises in applying this criterion is the consistency of the subdivision with the transportation and traffic -related elements of the YUACP. The proposal would alter the point of ingress to the interior of the subject property. YUACP Policy G4.5 (p. II.8) mandates the integration of subdivisions into the collector and arterial system. However, the purpose of the integration is to assure connectivity. There appears to be no material difference in connectivity between the proposed street layout in the preliminary plat and the current intersection of the N. 33rd Avenue ROW with Jefferson. Perhaps more importantly, YUACP Objective T3 and associated policies provide for consideration of traffic safety and congestion in the design of new development. Residents of N. 33rd Avenue state that they have difficulty entering Summitview during periods of high-volume traffic. In addition, the intersection with Summitview Avenue is HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 4 seasonally hazardous because of the grade of N. 33rd as it approaches the arterial in combination with unplowed snow. They believe that the hazards would be worse with traffic generated by the development of the lots within the subdivision. Other public comments indicate that N. 32nd Avenue is substandard. Nevertheless, the transportation capacity analysis indicates that the development of the subdivision will not exhaust the capacity of the arterials. In addition there is no evidence that there is anything unique about the intersection with respect to waiting time during high traffic periods With respect to winter conditions, the access to N. 32nd Avenue will provide an alternative to battling unplowed snow on the approach to Summitview for current N. 33rd Avenue residents and subdivision residents alike. There is no evidence that the subdivision of the property will unacceptably detract from accomplishing the transportation goals and objectives of the YUACP. Furthermore, based on lot size, the subdivision furthers various other goals and objectives set out in the plan including: (1) Goal H1- Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices. (2) Objective H1.2- Encourage a range of affordable home ownership options. (3) Policy H1.2 - Facilitate small lot sizes, manufactured housing on single family lots, condominiums, clustering and other options that increase the supply of affordable home ownership options Consistency with the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance regulates land uses The mere subdivision of the property into lots amenable to residential development in an area zoned for residential development is consistent with the zoning ordinance, presuming that the land itself is suitable for residential development. In this case, the land has no features that make it unsuitable for residential development. Subdivision design standards and other requirements are set out in Tables 5-1 and 5-2 of the ordinance. A review of the preliminary plat against the standards and requirements shows it to be consistent. There is no evidence that the subdivision is inconsistent with any provision of the zoning ordinance. The compliance of the proposed duplex development in the R-1 zone with zoning ordinance requirements is analyzed later in this recommendation. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 5 Consistency with the subdivision ordinance. The purposes of the subdivision ordinance include protection and preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by Chapter 58 17 RCW; to prevent overcrowding land, to lessen congestion in the streets and highways, to promote effective use of land; to promote safe and convenient travel by the public on streets and highways; to provide for adequate light and air; to facilitate adequate provision for water, sewerage, utilities, drainage, parks and recreation areas, sites for schools and school grounds and other public requirements; and to provide for proper ingress and egress. These factors are analyzed below. It should be noted that preliminary plats must contain certain information not included on the documents submitted with the master application. In particular, a plat map including information required by YMC 14.20 050A, -C, -F, -I, and -J, was not included in the staff report or among the other exhibits. These omissions do not appear prejudicial, since subdivision approval can be conditioned upon the necessary dedications, and slope issues are not significant on the property. Conformity with RCW 58.17.110. For the most part, the statutory criteria are adequately addressed by the preliminary plat or by operation of the development regulations. Generally, utilities are available in the area and may be readily extended through the platted easements. Irrigation water is available, and an easement must be dedicated to allow irrigation water delivery to all the designated lots The subject property is within the Yakima School District, which provided no comment suggesting any school -related issues. Parks and recreation issues are dealt with on a citywide basis through the YUACP and the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. Open space is addressed through the application of subdivision development standards. Street and sidewalk designs are addressed by design standards established in Title 12 of the Yakima Municipal Code The on-site platted streets must consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue must be barrier curb. The cul-de-sac must be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right-of-way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 6 Public safety requires that street naming and lot addressing be integrated with the naming system applied to other streets The preliminary plat indicates that the east -west street would be named Vineyard Way. Public safety requires that the street be designated as Folsom Avenue, consistent with the city's street naming system. Finally in regard to RCW 58.17.110 and YMC 14.20 100, a subdivision may be recommended if it is in the public interest. The subdivision will further housing goals and objectives set forth in the YUACP It will do so consistently with the traffic and transportation elements of the plan. It complies with subdivision standards, and so long as any issues of incompatibility are resolved in zoning review, it is consistent with the public interest. b Right of way vacation. The City is authorized to vacate platted rights of way by state law (Chapter 35.79 RCW) Right of way vacation is not a regulatory action, and is not addressed by regulations. Rather, the process is designed to assure public awareness of the proposed vacation, protection of public access to properties adjacent to the right of way, and appropriate recovery of public investments in streets acquired and developed through expenditure of public funds Based on these considerations, rights of way may be vacated by ordinance. Neither state law nor ordinances require the vacation to affirmatively serve a public purpose. Nevertheless, city policy requires that a request for vacation state the public benefits offered by the vacation. In this case, the vacation is tied to the subdivision of property and is effectively a rerouting of the right of way The principal public benefit of the vacation is that it will foster the subdivision development in a manner consistent with YUACP in -filling and housing goals. It is clear that the applicant's purpose is to maximize the number of lots in the subdivision through rerouting the right of way. That objective is not inconsistent with the public interest, so long as the zoning standards are satisfied. No public benefit at all is being realized from the currently undeveloped right of way. The development includes construction of streets and sidewalks where none now exist, and provide connectivity of N. 33rd Avenue to the city transportation grid rather than leaving it as a dead end. Current residents of N. 33rd Avenue do not view this connectivity as a benefit, since it brings with it the potential for more traffic from subdivision development. This concern is mitigated by the connection of the HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMFNDATION - 7 development through Folsom Avenue to N. 32nd Avenue, which is classified as an arterial street. There is no evidence that the connection of N. 33rd Avenue all the way through to Jefferson is somehow preferable as a matter of public interest. All property owners with lands abutting the targeted portion of the right of way agree with the vacation. No existing access to other properties is lost. City Resolution #D-5630 specifies the requirements for compensating the City for rights-of-way when vacated. The existing platted right-of-way for N 33rd Avenue, over and across this property, has never been constructed. Consequently, in accordance with Resolution D- #5630, no compensation should be required for this vacation. c. Class (2) review. Since proposed lots 13 through 17 and part of lot 12 are within the R-1 zone, the applicant seeks Class (2) review of the development of duplexes on those lots. As Class (2) uses, duplexes are generally permitted throughout the R-1 district. However, review is required in order to promote compatibility with the intent and character of the district and the objectives of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan. See YMC 15.02.020 (definition of Class (2) uses). Consistency of the proposed use with the YUACP. Consistency of the preliminary plat with the YUACP was analyzed in the previous section. However, the specific consistency of the R-1 duplex development with the YUACP must be considered. The YUACP establishes categories of residential uses based on density. The property proposed for the five duplexes in categorized as Low Density Residential Such property is characterized as primarily single family detached residences, with a density of seven dwelling units per acre or less Development of a parcel of such property into duplexes is in tension with the preferred future of the property. Adding to the tension is the objective of stabilizing and preserving neighborhoods. On the other hand, duplexes would foster affordable housing goals. Affordable housing goals are also in tension with the preferred future use. These tensions can be reconciled by the proposition that residential areas within the city are specifically assigned to density categories, and affordable housing goals are not property specific. The specific guidance should prevail over competing general guidance. Therefore, the proposed density on the five lots would be inconsistent with the YUACP. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 8 In addition, based on the guidance in the YUACP, "compatibility of new development must remain a principal focus of decision-making" when weighing competing values. Moderate Density Residential use (which includes duplex development) is generally compatible with Low Density Residential use where there is an interface of such uses See YUACP p. III -7 (Land Use Compatibility Chart). Certainly the development of five duplexes on lots adjacent to R-2 property does not present questions of incompatibility with the R-2 lots. In this case, though, the practical effect of duplex development would be to create a new interface or carve a portion out of the Low Density Residential area. The concentration of five duplexes in single family residential area differs in levels of activity and visual effect from the scattered presence of a few duplexes within a neighborhood. Therefore, the development may be said to affect the single family residential character of the neighborhood. A view from N 33rd Avenue of five obvious, essentially identical duplexes in a row might make a reasonable reviewer question whether the density designation of the property in the YUACP had any meaning. Does the development of duplexes on the five lots in itself present other incompatibility with neighboring uses? Public comment raised concerns about the rental use of the duplexes. The fact that duplexes may be rented does not affect the customary attributes of the single family neighborhoods, because any house may be converted to a rental property. Accordingly, while the condition of rental properties may affect neighborhood property values, that proposition holds for rental houses as well as duplexes. The N. 33rd Avenue neighbors are also concerned about congestion produced 68 vehicles within the subdivision That, however, is the point of promoting the transportation grid, and the options for ingress and egress mitigate congestion issues. Furthermore, with respect to the five lots in question, there is no evidence that the potential for ten vehicles in addition to the ten vehicles that would be produced from single family detached residences on the lots would lead to significantly greater (and thus incompatible) congestion. As discussed above however, the level of activity in the area resulting from the duplex development in the area is not consistent with the preferred single family residential character preferred in the YUACP. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 9 Several neighbors also commented with dismay on the potential for 35 -foot structures, since that is the structural height limitation in the district. Such structures would impair the aesthetic values in the territorial view the western neighbors enjoy on the property. Single story structures were less objectionable. The height limitation is less satisfactory to current neighbors on N. 33rd Avenue because of the issue of the concentration of the duplexes and the impact on neighborhood character. The applicant may be commended for addressing the compatibility concerns of the neighbors by limiting development to one-story structures and installing site screening fences on unscreened properties among the five lots, though the mitigation measures do not address the density conflicts. In short, the proposed density on the five Low Density Residential properties is not consistent with the YUACP. This presents an unfortunate complexity in developing a recommendation on conditions of approval. It becomes necessary to recommend alternative conditions. One alternative is to limit development to a combination of single family residences and duplexes that results in a density below the seven dwelling units per acre standard in the YUACP The other is to modify the Low Density Residential portion or the proposed plat into fewer lots so that the duplexes can be developed without exceeding the density threshold. The applicant is always free to pursue a YUACP amendment to change the designation and zoning of the subject lots. Compatibility with the intent and character of the R-1 district. The single-family residential district is intended to: a. Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single- family dwellings free from other uses except those which are compatible with, and serve the residents of, this district; and b. Locate moderate -density residential development, up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre, in areas served by public water and sewer. Detached single-family dwellings are the primary use in this district. The district is characterized by forty-five percent lot coverage; access to individual lots by local access streets; large front, rear and side yard setbacks; and one and two story structures. There is no argument that the proposed duplexes affirmatively serve the intent of the district. Given the compatibility analysis set out in the preceding paragraphs, the only HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 10 true conflict (given the mitigation proposed for the structures) presented by the Class (2) use, is in respect to density. The zoning ordinance carries forward the Low Density Residential concept in the intent statement for the R-1 district. Accordingly, the same density analysis applies to YUACP consistency and compatibility of the proposed use with the zoning district intent and character From the foregoing findings, the Hearing Examiner makes the following CONCLUSIONS 1. Pursuant to Chapter 58.17 RCW, § 14.30.080 YMC and § 15.11.110 YMC, the Hearing Examiner is authorized to make a recommendation to the City Council on preliminary plats and Master Applications. 2. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the YUACP. 3. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision is consistent with subdivision design standards and other relevant provisions of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance 4. The preliminary plat of the Summitview Vineyards subdivision complies substantially with Title 14 YMC (the subdivision ordinance) though the preliminary plat information provided in the hearing exhibits does not contain certain information required by YMC 14.20.050. 5. Easements must be dedicated for the purpose of delivery of irrigation water to the lots within the subdivision. 6. The vacation of the current Right of Way for N. 33Avenue within the subject property protects necessary access to abutting properties due to its connection with the dedication of a new right of way as part of the subdivision process. 7. No compensation of the city should be required for the vacation of the undeveloped right of way 8. All property owners of lands abutting the right of way proposed to be vacated support the vacation of the right of way. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 11 9. Vacation of the current N. 33rd Avenue right of way on the subject property is consistent with the public interest. 10. The construction of duplexes on all of Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 ("the R-1 block") is not consistent with residential density standards used in the YUACP or set out in YMC 15.03.030, since it would effectively convert a block of lots to moderate density use without benefit of legislative review. 11. Appropriate densities on the R-1 block can be achieved by modifying the preliminary plat to reduce the number of lots or by providing a mixture of single family residences and duplexes on the currently proposed lots. 12. Construction of duplexes on the R-1 block that are limited to one story and which are screened by appropriate fencing would avoid any significant incompatibilities with the neighboring single family residential use. From the preceding findings and conclusions, the Hearing Examiner makes the following RECOMMENDATION The Plat of Summitview Vineyards, the application for vacation of the N. 33rd Avenue right of way within the platted area, and the application forconstruction of duplexes in the R-1 zoning district should be APPROVED, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 1. The City Engineer has agreed to a modification to this street design and to a deferment of the frontage improvements along N. 32nd Ave. A deferment agreement must be signed by the property owners, recorded and referenced on the face of the plat prior to plat recording. 2. On-site platted streets shall consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue should be barrier curbs. The cul-de-sac should be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right of way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. 3. All lots shall be provided with public water and public sewer service according to YMC Title 12 standards. Prior to final plat approval written verification from the City of Yakima Engineering Division must be provided to the Planning Division BEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 12 indicating that all water and sewer extensions have been completed or financially secured. 4. A minimum 8 -foot wide public utility easement must be provided adjacent to all public road rights-of-way. 5. Easements for new and/or future utilities shall be a minimum of 16 feet in width, provided that the width of easements for buried utilities will be twice the depth of the planned excavation. 6. All public and private utilities shall be located underground, with the exception of telephone boxes and such similar structures. 7 All public and private utilities to be located within public road rights-of- way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction. 8. Fire hydrants shall be placed at the locations specified by the Building Codes Division and Yakima Fire Department. All lots must be provided with adequate fire flow. 9. Irrigation easements shall be provided or maintained as specified by the City of Yakima Water & Irrigation Division. 10. The final plat shall substantially conform to the preliminary plat, as modified by the City Council, or as modified to allow duplex construction that results in residential development densities below seven dwelling units per net residential acre on properties zoned R-1 as of the date of final action by the City Council on the subject applications, or as otherwise modified herein. 11. All permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. The developer shall designate during working hours a responsible party to serve as contact for suspected air quality violations. 12. The developer shall contact the State Department of Ecology to determine if a baseline general permit for stormwater discharges will be necessary for this development. Application shall be made at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. Erosion control methods such as temporary ponding, silt fencing, etc. must be in place prior to clearing, grading or construction. 13. All addresses shall be as specified by the City of Yakima Office of Code Administration. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 13 14 The final plat shall be subject to the following notes, which must be placed on the face of the plat: Lots 4 and 5 shall not have direct vehicular access onto N 32nd Avenue Duplexes constructed on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 shall be no more than one story. If duplexes are constructed on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17, a six-foot view obscuring fence or equivalently effective vegetation screen shall be installed where no other screen exists between the lots and single family residences existing at the time of final plat filing. The addresses shown on this plat are accurate as of the date of recording, but may be subject to change. The City of Yakima Building Codes Division is responsible for the confirmation or reassignment of addresses at the time of building permit issuance. 15. Density of residential development on Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 shall not exceed seven dwelling units per net residential acre. DATED THIS 3RD DAY OFO CT OB ER, 20 1. i' PA " ' D. SPUR G HE' ' G EXAMINER PRO Or ORE HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION - 14 JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER A Staff Report EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE A-1 Staff Report 9-12-01 City of Yakima, Washington Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Preliminary Plat Open Record Public Hearing September 12, 2002 Preliminary Plat Master Application by Jim Fickel for the Plat of Summitview Vineyards (17 lots), Location, 218 N 32ND Avenue Staff Report Pre -Plat #2-02, CL (2) #22-02, ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02, EC#13-02 Staff Contact: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner 575-6042 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION. The Division of Environmental Planning recommends the approval of the preliminary long plat and street vacation applications, but is not recommending the approval of the Class (2) application to place duplexes in the R-1 zone, or the Administrative Adjustment request for a reduction of the rear yard setback standard of the R-1 zone from 20 feet to 15 feet. Both of the recommendations for approval are subject to conditions. From the view of the site, the matters contained in the application, Development Services Team comments, and a review of both the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, staff makes the following: Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 1 DOC, INDEX FINDINGS APPLICANT. Jim Fickel 221 S 19th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 OWNERS. Jim Fickel and Bill Lynch LOCATION. This property is located on the west side of N 32nd Avenue approximately 400 feet north of the intersection with Summitview Avenue. PARCEL NOS. 181322-14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497, 14515 APPLICATION. Preliminary long plat for 17 residential lots and associated applications, located on approximately 4.5 acres. CURRENT ZONING AND USE. The current zoning for the N 33rd Avenue right-of-way and property to the east is R-2, Two-family residential. The zoning for the property to the west of the N 33rd Avenue right-of-way is R-1, Single-family residential. This property currently is vacant except for an old shed and some fruit trees. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The proposal is to subdivide the six existing lots into 17 new lots ranging in size from approximately 7,000 to 9,500 square feet. Within the plat there will be five lots that are zoned R-1 and the remaining 12 lots are zoned R-2. The existing right-of- way for the as yet unbuilt portion of N 33rd Avenue is requested to be vacated and replaced with a new north/south road ending in Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 2 a cul-de-sac. This road will interconnect with a new east/west road connecting with N 32nd Avenue. Additionally, this application contains a Class (2) request to allow duplexes to be built upon the five R-1 zoned lots together with an Administrative Adjustment request that the rear yard setback for these five lots be reduced from 20 feet to 15 feet. HEARING EXAMINER JURISDICTION. Pursuant to Chapter 58.17 RCW, § 14.30.080 YMC and § 15.11.110 YMC, the Hearing Examiner is authorized to make a recommendation to the City Council on preliminary plats and Master Applications. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Future Land Use map III -3 of the Comprehensive Plan designates the larger potion of the subject property as Medium Density Residential and the smaller westerly portion as Low Density Residential. The following goals, objectives and policies are found within the Plan: • Goal H1: Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices. • Objective H1.2: ownership options. Encourage a range of affordable home • Policy H1.2 - Facilitate small lot sizes, manufactured housing on single family lots, condominiums, clustering and other options which increase the supply of affordable home ownership options. • Goal H3: neighborhoods. Preserve and improve existing residential Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 3 • Policy H3.9: Encourage housing design and siting to be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE. Single-family Residential (15.03.030 (2). The single-family residential district is intended to: a. Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses except those which are compatible with, and serve the residents of, this district; and b. Locate moderate -density residential development, up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre, in areas served by public water and sewer. Detached single-family dwellings are the primary use in this district. The district is characterized by forty-five percent lot coverage; access to individual lots by local access streets; large front, rear and side yard setbacks; and one and two story structures. The dwelling unit density in this district is generally seven units per net residential acre or less. Ten dwelling units per acre is the proposed residential density within the R-1 zoned portion of this proposed subdivision. Development exceeding seven dwelling units per net residential acre may be allowed on those limited occasions when the reviewing official finds that the location and site plan of the project is such that the higher density would be compatible with neighboring land uses and the level of public services, and is consistent with the goals and objectives in the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan. Public water, sewer and other urban services are generally available throughout the district. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 4 Two -Family Residential District (15.03.030 (3). The purpose of the two-family residential district is to: a. Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings, duplexes and other uses compatible with the intent of this district; and b. Locate residential development with densities up to twelve dwelling units per net residential acre in areas receiving a full range of public services including public water and sewer service, and police and fire protection. The district is characterized by up to fifty percent lot coverage, access via local access streets and collectors, one and two story buildings, some clustering of units, and large front, rear and side yard setbacks. Typical uses in this district are single-family dwellings and duplexes. The density in this district generally ranges from seven to twelve dwelling units per net residential acre. Twelve dwelling units per acre is the proposed residential density within the R-2 zoned portion of this proposed subdivision. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM (DST). This request was submitted for review at the DST meeting held on August 7, 2002. The following comments were submitted at this meeting: Engineering. This site fronts on N. 32nd Ave. The existing right-of-way of 30 feet, on this side of centerline, agrees with Title 12. The City Engineer has agreed to a modification to this street design and to a deferment of the frontage improvements to this street. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 5 The on-site platted streets should consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue should be barrier curb. The cul-de- sac should be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right-of-way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 -foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. Sanitary sewer should be extended to provide each lot with public sewer. There will be sewer connection fees at the time of lot connection. Water is supplied by the City of Yakima. An 8 -foot wide public utility easement should be established along the frontage of all lots. With the proposed street vacation of N 33rd Avenue, as platted, the proposed new cul-de-sac street will satisfy the requirements for a permanent dead end street. There are no existing public utilities located within the area of the proposed vacation. There is an existing platted public utility easement along the west line of this proposal. This easement was created in the REPLAT SHUMAN ADDITION, affecting lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of this proposal. Fire Department. The Fire Department indicates that to properly serve this subdivision hydrants should be installed at the following locations: • Northeast corner of Lot 4 Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 6 • Southwest corner of Lot 12 Building Codes - Addressing. The proposed street name of Vineyard Way is a new street name for the City of Yakima. The name should be changed to Folsom Avenue in order to maintain the continuity of street names within the street grid system. Street name continuity is an important factor in the rapid delivery of emergency services. Addresses for duplex structures should include unit numbers, i.e. 3206 Folsom Avenue #1 and 3206 Folsom Avenue #2. The following addresses are assigned to each lot. Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 Lot 9 Lot 10 Lot 11 Lot 12 Lot 13 Lot 14 Lot 15 Lot 16 Lot 17 3206 Folsom Avenue 3204 Folsom Avenue 3202 Folsom Avenue 3200 Folsom Avenue 3201 Folsom Avenue 3203 Folsom Avenue 3205 Folsom Avenue 3207 Folsom Avenue 227 N 33rd Avenue 229 N 33rd Avenue 231 N 33rd Avenue 233 N 33rd Avenue 230 N 33rd Avenue 228 N 33rd Avenue 226 N 33rd Avenue 224 N 33rd Avenue 222 N 33rd Avenue Water/Irrigation Division. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 7 This development can be served by a 12' water line in N 32nd Avenue and a 6' water line in N 33rd Avenue. An 8' extension will be needed in Folsom Avenue from 32nd Avenue to 33rd Avenue and a 6' extension from the end of the main in N 33rd Avenue to Jefferson Avenue. A new easement will be required for the main in the vacated portions of N 33rd Avenue. There will be connection and installation charges for each new meter installed. The Jefferson Irrigation System should be kept intact with existing easements maintained or new easements provided for the existing pipe. Irrigation should be extended to serve each new lot with appropriate easements provided, if not, a one time 9 per square foot base irrigation fee will be charged to each lot at the time of domestic water connection. Clean Air. While the rezones, replats and vacations associated with these requests themselves cause no air pollution, subsequent permitted development will and is subject to air regulations. 1. Any renovations or demolitions of existing structures require a Notice of Demolition and Renovation to be file with and approved by YRCAA is required. An asbestos survey must be completed, and all asbestos must be removed prior to demolitions, per §3.07.F, G and H of YRCAA Regulations. 2.YRCCA regulations requires proponent to file with, and gain approval from YRCAA, a dust control plan to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases cited in this project if the proponent should decide to build, per §3.08 of YRCAA regulations. The fee for a construction dust plan is $205. Proponent is encouraged to Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 8 file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for the Year 2002. Department of Ecology. 1. Recommends soil sampling because of this property's past agricultural use. 2. Requires that erosion control methods be__in place prior to clearing, grading or construction. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE STANDARDS. 1. Conformance with the City's Zoning Ordinance: The proposed subdivision indicates all lots will have adequate access, be provided with all necessary utilities, exceed the minimum lot size for the R-1 and R-2 Zones of 7,000 square feet and meet or exceed the minimum lot width of 50 feet at of the required front setback. the rear 2. Conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan: This preliminary plat meets the intent and goals of the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential and moderate density residential development in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts. 3. Conformance with the provisions of this title: Currently this preliminary plat complies with the provisions of Title 14 YMC that pertain to preliminary plats. 4. Appropriate provisions for: Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 a. Public health, safety and welfare: Plat is consistent with concerns. b. Open Spaces: No open spaces are required, nor provided. c. Drainage Systems: Drainage of the street and driveway areas within the plat will be provided for onsite in accordance with designs to be approved by the City Engineer. d. Streets, alleys, and other public ways: The interior streets are to be dedicated to the public and improved to City's standards. Right-of-way along N 32nd Avenue currently meets the City's standards. Engineer has deferred all improvements Avenue. The City to N 32nd e. Water supplies: Public water will be used for domestic and fire flow purposes. f. Sanitary waste disposal: Public sewer will be available to all lots in the plat. g. Parks and Playgrounds: No new parks are being considered with this development application. Gilbert, Franklin and North 44th Avenue Parks are the nearest existing parks to this development. h. Sites for schools: No new schools are being considered in this development application. Robertson and Gilbert Elementary and Franklin Middle School are the closest schools to this development. No comments were received Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 10 from the Yakima School District concerning this development. 5. Serves Public Use and Interest. The proposed 17 -lot subdivision appears to be consistent with neighboring land uses and in an area well suited for residential development. Compatibility with the adjoining neighborhood will largely be decided through testimony provided at the hearing, after which, additional mitigating measures may be called for. CRITERIA FOR VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. City policy provides five criteria for the granting of vacation petitions, they are as follows: 1. The Petition must explain the public benefit of the project and the reasoning of the proposed vacation and the limits of the vacation. The petition explains that this vacation is being sought for the development of this property into a residential subdivision. The public benefit derived from residential expansion is a higher community tax base, additional jobs during development and additional housing for the community. The limits of the vacation are clearly spelled out in the petition. 2. The vacation of right-of-way does not deny sole access to any property. This vacation request would not deny sole access to any property. 3. Petitions should be consistent with the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and other official City plans and policies. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 11 The current TIP does not include any planned improvements for the right-of-way to be vacated. The vacation is consistent with the Six -Year Road Plan and all relevant City plans and policies. 4. Vacation requests should be appropriate with existing and anticipated development in the area, based on zoning, current use and long-range plans. This vacation request is part of an overall plan to develop and build a residential subdivision in an area that is zoned for residential purposes. North 33rd Avenue cannot continue to the south of Summitview or to the north of Jefferson, consequently, the vacation and replacement by a cul-de-sac is appropriate. 5. Existing Utilities (public and franchised) should be relocated at the developer's expense or an adequate easement provided. Where appropriate, if existing utilities are deemed not necessary this requirement may be waived. With the vacation of unbuilt N 33rd Avenue, as it was originally platted, existing easements for irrigation will be eliminated. New easements should be established for the existing east/ west irrigation line at the north end of the property. FAIR MARKET APPRAISAL AND COMPENSATION TO CITY City Resolution #D-5630 specifies the requirements for compensating the City for rights-of-way when vacated. Compensation in the amount of one-half of the appraised value is required to be paid to the City on the vacation of any public street, alley, or any portion thereof, in the City of Yakima unless the right-of-way is unimproved or not maintained, the city has purchased the right-of-way at public expense (100% compensation required) or the ownership of the vacated right-of- way will revert to the State, County, or School District. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 12 The existing platted right-of-way for N 33rd Avenue, over and across this property, has never been constructed. Consequently, in accordance with Resolution D-#5630, no compensation will be required for this vacation. In review of this application the project complies with the standards of the zoning ordinance that pertain to subdivision as follows: CLASS (2) LAND USE REVIEW Table 4-1 lists duplexes as a Class (2) land use within the R-1, Single -Family Residential zoning district. Class (2) uses are generally permitted, however, the compatibility between a Class (2) use and the surrounding neighborhood cannot be determined in advance and occasionally a Class (2) use may be incompatible at a particular location. Therefore, Class (2) review by the administrative official is required in order to promote compatibility with the intent and character of the district and the objectives and development criteria of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. The administrative official may approve, deny, or impose conditions on the proposed use and site development (YMC 15.04.020). ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT The UAZO, Chapter (15.10.020) authorizes Official building the Administrative to adjust certain standards of the ordinance, including setback requirements. allow for site flexibility tradeoffs in amenities for and the five criteria listed in UAZO conforms in the following ways: Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 Such adjustments are intended to provide the opportunity for some adjustment 15.10.020, 13 in standards. the subject Of the proposal 1. Siting for solar access: Does not apply, solar access considerations are not relevant to this adjustment request. 2. Zero Lot Line construction: Does not apply, no residential zero lot line construction is proposed. 3. Coordinate site features with surrounding land uses: The proposed use is in keeping with the existing residential land uses in the immediate neighborhood. Location of residential structures within 15 feet of the rear yard property line should not create development problems on the adjoining lots; however, several letters have indicated that this adjustment is, in their opinions, incompatible. 4. Flexibility of design: Reduction of the rear yard setback from 20 to 15 feet provides the type of flexibility that is admittedly envisioned in Chapter 15.10. Flexibility, however, is not a goal to be achieved at the cost of compatibility. 5. Consistency with sub -area plans: No sub -area plans exist to address this area. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. On August 22, 2002 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the City of Yakima. This DNS was issued under WAC 197- 11-355. No appeals were filed within the five-day appeal period. TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 14 Traffic Capacity Analysis, completed on July 22, 2002, indicates that this development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City's arterial street system and that reserve capacity exists on all streets impacted by this development. PUBLIC NOTICE. Public notice of the application and hearing was provided in accordance with: YMC Title 14, Subdivision Ordinance; YMC Title 15, Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 6.:88, Environmental Policy and YMC Title 16, Development Permit Regulations. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Six letters and one petition with 16 signatures were submitted during the 20 -day comment period. None of the letters were written in support of the application as submitted. In an attempt to succinctly summarize these comments the following chart has been prepared: Setback Duplexes Comments Adjustment in R-1 Letter 1: No No No two-story buildings. Letter 2: No No Letter 3: Improve 32nd Avenue Letter 4: Adjust both front and rear Letter 5: No No Letter 6: Deny Project Petition 1: No No Deny project COMMENTARY. This application provides an example of one reason why there are Class (2) land use reviews. Class (2) review indicates that the requested use is normally approvable but carries with it the Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 15 critical caveat that compatibility must be assured. "Compatibility" is defined by the zoning ordinance as meaning "...the characteristics of different uses or development that permit them to be located near each other in harmony." (YMC 15.02.020). There are certainly areas within the City of Yakima where a similar request would go forward totally unremarked. In these areas compatibility is not a problem. In.. this particular application, however, both the Class (2) and administrative adjustment requests have been cited by neighbors as being incompatible. The determining factors in staff's recommendation for denial of the above referenced requests are: 1. Dwelling unit density exceeds the seven -units per net acre norm for the R-1 zoning district. 2. Setback adjustments will benefit only the developer with no corresponding benefit to the neighbors. 3. Neighborhood comments indicate that both requests are incompatible at this location. Consequently, staff makes a finding that reduced rear yard setbacks and duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of this subdivision are incompatible at this location. CONCLUSIONS. 1. The hearing examiner has jurisdiction. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 16 2. This recommendation is based upon a project narrative and site plan submitted July 8, 2002. 3. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for this project on August 22, 2002 and the five-day appeal period lapsed at 5:00 p.m. on August 27th. 4. For the reasons stated herein, this preliminary subdivision complies with the objectives of the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, the intent of the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts, the provisions of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Title 12, Development Standards Ordinance and Traffic Concurrency Ordinance. 5. During project review it has been found that this request is in compliance with YMC 16.06.020 (B) for making a Determination of Consistency as follows: A. The proposed use is permitted within the R-2 zone and comprises a Class (2) land use within the R-1 zoning district. B. All necessary public facilities are available to serve this site. C. With the exception of the rear yard setback within the R-1 zoning district this proposal is consistent with existing development regulations for this location. RECOMMENDATION. The Division of Environmental Planning recommends that the 17 -Lot subdivision known as Summitview Vineyards be approved but that Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 17 the Class (2) and Administrative Adjustment requests be denied on the basis of neighborhood incompatibility. The portions of this application recommended for approval should be made subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer has agreed to a modification to this street design and to a deferment of the frontage improvements along N. 32nd Ave. A deferment agreement must be signed by the property owners, recorded;and referenced on the face of the plat prior to plat recording. 2. On-site platted streets shall consist of a dedicated 50 -foot right-of-way with 32 feet of asphalt paving, rolled curb, controlled drainage and streetlights. The curb returns at the intersection of N 32nd Avenue should be barrier curbs. The cul-de-sac should be improved with an 80 -foot diameter right of way, rolled curbs, a paving diameter of 65 feet, 5 - foot wide sidewalk, controlled drainage and streetlights. 3. All lots shall be provided with public water and public sewer service according to YMC Title 12 standards. Prior to final plat approval written verification from the City of Yakima Engineering Division must be provided to the Planning Division indicating that all water and sewer extensions have been completed or financially secured. 4.A minimum 8 -foot wide public utility easement must be provided adjacent to all public road rights-of-way. 5. Easements for new and/or future utilities shall be a minimum of 16 feet in width, provided that the width of easements for buried utilities will be twice the depth of the planned excavation. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 18 6. All public and private utilities shall be located underground, with the exception of telephone boxes and such similar structures. 7. All public and private utilities to be located within public road rights-of-way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction. 8. Fire hydrants shall be placed at the locations specified by the Building Codes Division and Yakima Fire Department. All lots must be provided with adequate fire flow. 9. Irrigation easements shall be provided or maintained as specified by the City of Yakima Water & Irrigation Division. 10. The final plat shall substantially conform to the preliminary plat, except as may be modified by the hearing examiner or City Council. 11. All permits required by the Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority shall be obtained. The developer shall designate during working hours a responsible party to serve as contact for suspected air quality violations. 12. The developer shall contact the State Department of Ecology to determine if a baseline general permit for stormwater discharges will be necessary for this development. Application shall be made at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 19 13. Erosion control methods such as temporary ponding, silt fencing, etc. must be in place prior to clearing, grading or construction. 14. All addresses shall be as specified in the findings of this report. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat. 15. The final plat shall be subject to the following notes, which must be placed on the face of the plat: a. Lots 4 and 5 shall not have direct vehicular access onto N 32nd Avenue. b. The addresses shown on this plat are accurate as of the date of recording, but may be subject to change. The City of Yakima Building Codes Division is responsible for the confirmation or reassignment of addresses at the time of building permit issuance. Jim Fickel 218 N 32nd Ave Pre. Long Plat #2-02, R/W Vacation #3-02 Class (2) #22-02, Adm. Adj. #10-02 EC #13-02 20 JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER B Maps / Site Plan EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE B-1 Maps: Vicinity, Mailing, Aerial, Zoning and Atlas 7-11-02 B-2 Site Plan 7-8-02 10 9 FLAGG 7 THE PLAT OF' SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS % VS IE 1/4 or 9ECfl I n. idwhHP 13 NOM NA NCE u EJNAL YAgiM mom Noill1C1ON JEM311011 MEWL w Carver u[ ADDmoN R — 1 • 5 4 3 2 1 LINCOLN AVE N 37TH AVE HILLCREST DR 14022 14023 140 140 4410 14+41 14114 140 Burning Tree Or 445 5114448414 14' •-5 456 14 X534 504 14445 z 144"46 1 ,Y 4411/44 '139 384813314344433 1443L'- 4 14428442944254422 ":/ 4212 191419141 414'; 14413, 14430442$442044_, 4281420141844116412: 14411, JEFFERSON AVE 144"4444434 42 : 144,08' . ,1 14442 '14523 a 1 4407 14491- ;14504: 14511 14505- 14510 14509 14508 1449 14506 04507 14465 1403`:' 14489q� 14039 � 8�a82 14464 14483 " 43 z 14502 14501 14500 . 14499 /, 14498 4 IIIt11y11; 9114'ill 14' g 4 14475 14462 14476 14463- 14477 14464 48' 1'4478 14465. 144804 791 40 1410,4446344di401 ,/ 14514 11 N 32ND AVENUE 14056 14055 . 14054" 14051 461167 ' .1 VIEW AVENUE 06`'2, 140 .53 14474 14473 14471. 14470 14513' 14 3512 23511 3517; 8 23508 :23608'. )0 23510 , - 23507, " 23028 23566,; - .-,: - " 23029 23505 ' 23504 23503 23426 is 23427 • 23429 23426-' 23430. 234251, 2" 23030 23431 23424 PONOEAOSA PLACE 23432 :.23433" 23434 23435 23421 23420 "23436 23419 " 23418: TAYLOR WAY 4 449 41020 41016 4' 014101441000081 0 41001 SHARON WAY BARGE STREET 832499 7 Z N N 31ST AVENUE 234Q8. 09 2 2350 23504 23448 23447 '23446 :23445 ;23414- '23413 . z 2344 %'234 2.40 23439 N 31ST AVENUE N 0- S MCKINLEY AVE RICHEY ROAR LINCOLN AVENUE N 30TH AVENUE CLEMAN AVENUE SUMMITVIEW AVENUE S 30TH AVE N 29TH AVENUE CANTERBURY L i CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Information Services - GIS FILE NO: R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJ10-02 APPLICANT: JIM FICKEL REQUEST: VACATE PORTION R/W ON 33RD AVE, 17 LOT LONG PLT, CONSTRUCT DUPLEXES, ADJUST SE1BACKS LOCATION: VIC. OF N. 33RD AVE. & JEFFERSON Scale —I in = 400ft 0 200 18132214493 18132214494 18132214495 18132214496 18132214497 18132214515 400 t ' R- W-VAC3-02 07/11/02 13—( 3-01 Burning Tree Dr ICHFY RDAs LINCOLN AV LINCOLN AVENUE JEFFERSON AVE 1� It L v =MI s . e... e SUMMITVIEW AVENUE MIN UPI 1"ilall1111111 11111111 111111:: SUMMITVIEW AVENUE BARGE STREET CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Information Services - GIS FILE NO: R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJ10-02 APPLICANT: JIM FICKEL REQUEST: VACATE PORTION R/W ON 33RD AVE, 17 LOT LONG PLT, CONSTRUCT DUPLEXES, ADJUST SETBACKS LOCATION: VIC. OF N. 33RD AVE. & JEFFERSON Scale —lin = 400ft 0 200 400 Subject Property Zoning Boundary Yakima City Limits L'U,4C3-02 07/11/02 RIW VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT' -02, CL2-22-02ilsulec JIM FICKEL R-2 Two -Family Residential R-1 Single -Family Rest ntral VACATE PORTION R/W ON 33RD AVE, 17 LO R-3 Multi Family Residential LONG PLT, CONSTRUCT DUPLEXES, ADJUSIIiETBA sional Busmess VIC. OF N. 33RD AVE. & JEFFERSON Subject Property — City Limits HB Historical Business SCC Small Convenience Center LCC Large Convenience Center CBD Central Business District CBDS CBD Support M-1 Light Industrial ® M-2 Heavy Industrial LINCOLN AVE _—E Burning Tree Dr -_—TAYIDLWAY 1 i JEFFERSON AVE N 32ND AVENUE L I MOW._, Avf -- • - RIz Z _ RICHEY ROAD z I # r LINCOLN AVENUE SUMMITVIEW AVENUE NILLCI SUMMITVIEW AVENUE I I — __ _ — CANTERBURY-- IEL� BARGE STREET ( I I I o I! Scale —1 in = 4000 0 200 400 R-W-UAC3-02 City of Yakima, Washington July 11, 2002 01 T 1 vek I. • • • R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJIO-02 1 Ir 1 t . r LINCOLN AVE _—E Burning Tree Dr -_—TAYIDLWAY 1 i JEFFERSON AVE N 32ND AVENUE L I MOW._, Avf -- • - RIz Z _ RICHEY ROAD z I # r LINCOLN AVENUE SUMMITVIEW AVENUE NILLCI SUMMITVIEW AVENUE I I — __ _ — CANTERBURY-- IEL� BARGE STREET ( I I I o I! Scale —1 in = 4000 0 200 400 R-W-UAC3-02 City of Yakima, Washington July 11, 2002 01 T 1 vek I. • • • R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJIO-02 lr �} ' 1.. *F • *L4 moi• • _.; 1•' , .. .4 viir 11 ir a— " 0- - 1! - - - -1 1:;:r- : 1C -i '.46' si A- . 0 AY it, - al : ‘14/ AL ......- ."1 0 ffit.---- -, t 7_ A • 1v L., • iv 4..aJr_r { a M *, �.lei • -2 1.- 1 1'. Ar...t. ----,•••••1 411. •I s.. i. ..., . 4,,,,,, ,,j4ii.it, ,,,, ,..,... ,... ,_.4. i. Ad - •••••. 14 1 4 • ' �..I _ ,-4I 1, .._t - . -I y `. 1 �.., Iv. '...,,r b, g • . .ttp :1111 p., 7-, ; t 1 :1, :fiNli . -A5 4. . -1 -Lir. -:=........._ ..... - ... .. •••-- ... -, - - _ J • v�_i! .-• r 7 Sell hi 'P fl U� 1 ---3- t t 1 -I k • - 0..,. --Ar. r ' • s ii. .is .,i1 ,I ' * • '---:L--a.lij'j .,.} . ' .u.f' . , a. V oir A_ - ir4111A- a AL 11 - in .` ""�j - s �� , °r �' � CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON Information Services - GIS FILE NO: R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-02, CL2-22-02 & ADJ 10-02 APPLICANT: JIM FICKEL REQUEST: VACATE PORTION R/W ON 33RD AVE, 17 LOT LONG PLT, CONSTRUCT DUPLEXES, ADJUST SETBACK LOCATION: VIC. OF N. 33RD AVE. & JEFFERSON 0 Scale -1 in = 400ft 200 400 Subject Property Zoning Boundary Yakima City Limits R -W -V . Q2 07, / INDEX # 6--1 314 312 308 306 3414 j , i 326 3408 3406 3402' i3312I3310 33063304 3302 3212 3210 3208 313 324 311 309 3405 3403 3401 _ 320 3311 3309 3307 3305 3303 3211 3209 3207 318 JEFFERSON AVE 3110 320 321 319 316 317 314 315 312 313 3 315 310 311 304 307 305- 230 229 228 — 227 226 w 224 Q 225 226 = 223 222 - — 220 ro 223 224 1tI 219 3406 3404 3402 c-4 3310 3306 W as r� 230 hZ •227 228 z 225 314 3212 3210 3208 312 313 308 307 311 306 218 221 216 219 214 212 210 208 3501 J 222 216 213 214 211 212 207 208 3415 13411 1 204 217 215 216 213 214 211 212 207 206 I ! 1 205 , 3309' 3307 3301 SUMMITVIEW AVENUE 3406 I 13404 205 I 208 L 204 304 305 302 301 225 221 222 223 217 218 215 216 211 209 212 M Z 209 221 219 w;-- �, 217 w >1 215 u) 211 207 205 208 206 207 205 Current Zoning 3215' 3213 CURRENT ZONING SR Suburban Residential R-1 Single -Family Residential R=2 Two -Family Residential R-3 Multi -Family Residential B -I Professional Business B-2 Local Business HB Historical Business SCC Small Convenience Center LCC Large Convenience Center CBD Central Business District CBDS CBD Support M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial 1 JEFFERSON AVE Future Land Use FUTURE LAND USE Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Professional Office 1 Neighborhood Commercial Large Convenience Center Arterial Commercial CBD Core Commercial Industrial Urban Reserve 314 3414 312 310 308 306 313 3406 3406 3402 3312 3310 3306 3304 3302 3212 311 309 307 3210 3208 3405 3403 3401 3311 3309 3307 3305 3303 3211 3209 3207 JEFFERSON AVE -' 3406 3404 3402 3310 305 w 229 230 FI --oai 226 226 ,F2 is 223 224 Z' - 216 y 221 216 222 I 218 217 215 213 223 219 214 216 213 214 212, i-- — 210 211 212 206 287 206 3601 3415 J L 3411 204 227 • 3306 3212 3210 3206 326 i 324 320 316 314 312 216 214 211 212 207 206 1 3301 205 i 3308 3307 SUMMITVIEW AVENUE I 3106 13404 213 209 205 3215 3213 3211 I I s �� le la 3110 321 319 3010 316 317 314 312 315 313 310 306 311 306 309 w 7 307 z z 221 304 302 224 222 219 220 217 218 215 1 216 211 h 208 212 -1 207— 205 206 201 315 313 N 31ST AVENUE 311 307 305 3 303 — 301 j 225 223 221 219 217 215 ' 211 209 207 205 I- a a SUM e JEFFERSON AVE SUMMITVIEW AVENUE L SUM Current Zoning CURRENT ZONING SR Suburban Residenual R-1 Single -Family Residential ■ R-2 Two-Fanuly Residential . R-3 Multi -Family Residential B-1 Professional Business . B— Local Business HB Historical Business SCC Small Convenience Center ■ LCC Large Convenience Center ■ CBD Central Business District CBDS CBD Support M-1 Light Industnal . M-2 Heavy Industrial Future Land Use FUTURE LAND USE Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential ■ High Density Residential Professional Office ■ Neighborhood Commercial ■ Large Convenience Center Arterial Commercial ■ CBD Core Commercial Industrial • Urban Reserve 1 w1 . .fe .,4; `_ Yakima Water & Sewer N N N Water Line Sewer Lines Imgation Main FILE NO: R/W VAC3-03, PRE LNG PLT2-0 APPLICANT: JIM FICKEL Digital Orthophoto Mosaic of Digital Orthophotography flown 03/12/94 CITY OF YAKIMA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPEMENT 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone: (509(575-6113 Fax (509(575-6105 All maps shown at 1" = 3001t One page Atlas: r-w-vac3-02' Created: July 11, 2002 JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER C DST Comments EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE C-1 Request for Comments 8-7-02 C-2 Agencies Contacted 8-7-02 C-3 Comments from Max Linden, City Wastewater Division 8-7-02 C-4 Comments from Mitch Cole, Yakima Fire Dept. 8-7-02 C-5 Comments from Carolyn Belles, City Code Administration 8-23-02 C-6 Comments from Dave Brown, City Water/Irrigation 8-7-02 C-7 Transportation Concurrency Analysis submitted by Joan Davenport, City Traffic Engineering 7-22-02 July 22, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2301 Fruitvale Blvd., Yakima, Washington 98902 Phone (509) 575-6005 Jim Fickel 221 South 19th Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Subject: Notice of Decision for Transportation Concurrency Analysis 17 -Lot Duplex Subdivision, 218 North 32ad Ave RECEIVED JUL 2 3 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING ON Dear Applicant, Enclosed is the Decision for the Transportation Capacity Analysis of the 17 -lot duplex development proposed to be located at 218 North 32nd Avenue, within the City of Yakima, Washington. This development has been APPROVED for Concurrency Analysis. Concurrency review determined that reserve capacity is available on all impacted arterial streets. Concurrency review does not evaluate impact to local access streets or street intersections. This review does not include safety or site design issues which will be addressed at the project review level of zoning and SEPA. This review concluded that the proposed development will not exceed the capacity of the arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted arterial streets. Please review the enclosed report. You may appeal the Findings of this report or request Administrative Reconsideration within fifteen (15) days from the date of mailing of this Notice. Appeal forms and procedures are available at the Department of Community and Economic Development, but if you have any questions, please give me a call at (509)576- 6417. Sincerely, JoaniVavenport Su ervising Traffic Engineer enclosure copy: Chris Wilson, City Planning Division Sandy Cox, City Code Division Adrnmastratiou 575-6005 , Equipment Rental 575-6005 , Parks & Recreation 575-6020 Street 575-6005 Traffic 575-6005 Transit 575-6005 1994 # Yakima W URC 3-�Z1 Refuse 575-6005 2 �© Date of Review: Review Prepared by: Proposed Development: Subject Address: ITE Land Use Category: Calculation: City of Yakima, Washington Traffic Division of Public Works Department Transportation Concurrency Analysis July 22, 2002 Joan Davenport, Supervising Traffic Engineer (576-6417) Fickel Duplex Development (Receipt #130740) 218 North 32nd Ave LU #220, Apartment/Rental 0.62 PM Peak Hour Trips per Dwelling Unit [0.62 * 34 = 21.08 PM Peak Hour Trips] Expected Net PM Peak Hour Trip Generation: 21 PM Peak Hour trips Summary of Impact: The applicant, James Fickel proposes to develop 17 duplex housing units. The site is located at 218 North 32nd Avenue, within the City of Yakima, Washington.. All traffic from this new development will enter the Arterial Street system on Tieton Drive. City of Yakima Administrative procedures for Concurrency Analysis use the PM Peak hour trip of the adjacent street for the selected land use category. The site generated traffic is distributed to the Arterial street sections noted below, based upon the City policy to assess impacts for two Arterial street segments. Estimated distribution of the site generated trips is shown on the table below . Based upon actual data, City of Yakima Traffic Volumes for PM Peak Hour are assessed as 8.7% of total Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Peak hour reserve capacity includes any vehicle trips previously assigned under the Concurrency Ordinance. City of Yakima Transportation Concurrency assesses arterial street segment capacity only and does not address intersection capacity. Seg Street Segment ADT Pk Hr Cap' Pk Hr (8.7% ADT) Pk Hr Reserve Cap. Dev. PM Pk Hr impact V/C LOS 64 32nd Ave: Lincoln Ave to Summitview 4500 1600 392 1180 21 0.27 A 65 32nd Ave: Summitview to Tieton 4100 1600 357 1302 3 0.23 A 118 Lincoln Ave: 32nd to 40th Ave 8000 3200 696 2511 4 0.22 A 119 Lincoln Ave: 24th Ave to 32nd Ave 9500 3200 827 2553 5 0.32 A 137 Summitview: 40th Ave to 32nd Ave 13400 3200 1166 1994 6 0.37 A 138 Summitview: 24th to 32nd Ave 13700 3200 1192 1997 6 0.38 A Summary of Impact to City of Yakima Arterial Streets: This application has been reviewed and approved for consistency with YMC 12.08 Transportation Capacity Management Ordinance. This development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City Arterial street system and reserve capacity exists on all impacted streets. This review does not include any site development or safety issues which may be discussed at the project level or SEPA review. Transportation Capacity Analysis Page 1 of 1 CITY OF YAKIMA: LAND USE APPLICATION '" 0 8 2002 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98901 VOICE: (509) 575-6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. JOAN DAVENPORT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CERTIFICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the fling fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. 1. APPLICANT 2. APPLICANT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER 3. APPLICANT'S IN 1'EREST IN PROPERTY STREET CITY 1.li, !- ) /j4 STATE I r ZIP 67 9O 2 PHONE (5 2 � `� _ q z.7 .5-- MESSAGE ( CHECK OWNER `' ONE 0 CONTRACT PURCHASER O OWNER REPRESENTATIVE O OTHER 4. PROPERTY OWNER (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) NAME 3—) M EI646 L- &1 LL Lt-iNG14 5. PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS AND PHONE (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STREET 2.2 / 5'0, 47-14 4 1e3s a i CITY LisiztepA STATE WA ZIP eigp2_ PHONE ( ) ztrto-ci275' MESSAGE ( 6. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY: //3/321,— /L/L/93 7 /1/41417 2 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPEkrY: , —/ ,e _2_ )/j4 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Z/0 A)o. 3Z `=1? /$ aLA 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) } Class (2) Use ❑ Class (3) Use ❑ Rezone ❑ Variance 0 Home Occupation Administrative Adjustment Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑ Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ l ppeal ❑ Nonconforming Structure/Use 3K Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Short Plat Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Short Plat Exemption ❑ Shoreline ❑ Utility Easement Release ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner OtherCAW-AT , ',7S S 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS n and the required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE Revised 9-98 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY FILE NO. AMO 75/ TT 7/ RECEIPT NO. HEARING DATE • &- /0 J` AID RECEIVED BY —C DATE THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS ' 1/a NE 1N or SECTION 22. TRANSHIP 13 mums RANO( In £W.H. YAMNA CUOMO. 1A STANC1B1 4 JEFFERSON NIENUE mm. r .Nac Luc 0 d 10 F LAGG 9 7 Dana "MX1Mr AG DIM 131IVISS r swot M¢ (W— TAS or h tl Marl 1,1, err r VIVO, LAM 5 ADDt170N R— 1 4 YN'1rIrz 1,463' 3 2 1 VICINITY tt P VD LI.LVODRVA LEON. ECERIPTION - PARER MEETS > PR Oa) 115 Na®e . E6R1r VeltiOSI--.uNO. oNRt VINO VIDE POI VI RN sit, -w-. NmrA1. — ,am -,4M EffaMiroLlrrarM YUAN Elenfarollnule= RAM NN]E,— boost-�uee Donee MEE NrfA, es 10151-101. rm'4+aODIf turns MEW row toren Haws faairt. Vrelai9 COUNT. EG! Or NNd'NI®. Rf-IrlIBRA 0C' rs r N®!7/ RAOEIW L_ - -- VS. 1 16.111 v. s b 2 3 4 -ice_" 'os_ _ —"-_ e P Mr Ir[ L3" TPANSITE PPE TION.) rKRCAIli. SESl S Too SORE CENTER IR CURYE ORA VW_ BASS OF MAR/MS.- EAST. VINE Of T1E NE 1/4 or SECTION XL TOM ITTP 13 1= MAGE 1E ENV RENO N 00i500' lY As ` ON ON TIE SURVEY RECORDED LOW ARMORS FRNE Ne. 7045903 EOILI V,Ir nienelinIIIIIIDONDROVVVEDVM NK 3 EX, IB IT 1 Water Irrigation DST Comments Applicant: Vineyards Location: 218 n. 32nd Ave. Parcel #: 181322-14493-14497&14515 Date: 8/7/2002 1= primary review 2= secondary review L d W N 'L7 , 0 U 0 F- 0 1 CO w i R 0. Comments Submitted By: Dave Brown Water/Irrigation Engineer 575-6204 Division: Water/Irrigation Division 1 WATER & IRRIGATION existing location, size, etc. extension necessary, size fire hydrant new public easements LID/connection charges service installation charges public/private system Fireflow calculations % C 1173 g 71 Dave Brown Irrigation System 12" in 32nd, 6" in 33rd Yes, 8" in Vineyard Way and 6" from end of main in 33rd to Jefferson 33rd and Vineyard Way, will most likely need another hydrant at Vineyard Way and 32nd and at new end of 33rd Yes for main in abandoned part of 33rd Yes, for each meter Yes, for each meter Public Jefferson System. Should be kept intact and easements for existing pipe. Should be extended to serve each new lot. 08/06/2002 Revised 8/23/02 To: Bruce Benson, City of Yakima Planning Div. From: Carolyn Belles, City of Yakima Office of Code Admin. Please note Vineyards Wy. has been renamed Folsom Ave. in order to be consistent with existing street names and reduce/eliminate future confusion. Lot 1: Lot 2: Lot 3: Lot 4: Lot 5: Lot 6: Lot 7: Lot 8: Lot 9: Lot 10: Lot 11: Lot 12: Lot 13: Lot 14. Lot 15: Lot 16: Lot 17: Thanks! 3206 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3204 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3202 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3200 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3201 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3203 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3205 Folsom Ave. #1-2 3207 Folsom Ave. #1-2 227 N 33rd Ave #1-2 229 N 33rd Ave #1-2 231 N 33rd Ave #1-2 233 N 33rd Ave #1-2 230 N 33rd Ave #1-2 228 N 33rd Ave #1-2 226 N 33rd Ave #1-2 224 N 33rd Ave #1-2 222 N 33rd Ave #1-2 DOC. INDEX f(!S, • THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS 8 1/4.11I 1.4 OF SECRO71 rL 7010!!1! 13 NORTH. WOE ,m LraN- Y1110N. COUNTY. D17.CW71 MUM' ry pw 1 NO. JEFREMCM MOW OIL r NNW rli 1r .tnr31r. Millnik 1111111taimuoiois r►�■ TON ill IE04. OG100PI314 — NOON R11m3 R - 1 mem r. ,as. -o... MSC Oft lR:alea MYrrrMIR A. MM. r. ,a>. -,..r. raiMIEW.21701111:1 BA= - r. ,aa -L.07 -■ r1. (la�b�a-1.Y. I�(1Yr7> RN ru urs r_. Main' 1r.nrr _, IN .r Mawr. -v...... • 11,11•111. aat• 070!,06 oar r:Q l.R R - 1 TTG 0 /7 07 c/6- ;amt. -al= R - 1 R& 77C.2LiiCJR7rL•RWMIttf .7LCTON ID 1071[ CENTER 1910 CURVE DMA r ate= :�aaa at•...a114_-r II 1111111111.1 111111 — ma or FrArsark EAST LR1E Or T0 K 1/4 Or SECTOR 22. TOZ)0141, 13 R7NCE 111 E191 OERIC N 00'2500" 1 AS 9S4 4 OUT( SURVEY RECORDED UNDER MT!! 111 Na. 7013.03 rami .�.$ 3s MONKS -E)'/1/BIT 1. Pi 049 esra PMM�y ii211 Tan au. 7(U7 CV.nwiu7 ow(Yr wN O _/ 9I J 4162' 7 ORM* 111111.1111111 Ala ra171®7 THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS JEFFERSON NONE YL NE 1.11 CP =MI fl. Towson 13 NORTH. Rola 11 DIY 1111111.1 COMM 1111i1NCIO11 CAL 011111011011 =MO IA Bo r1010 Mr 5 ADDmoN R-1 4 1010110 RK R - 1 } 3 4 .x"17 1- 1311111_ --- 1atJ_ rVrr 10 R — 1 011.11 1nirn.rc T10 rYr 10L 10.111. w i 3 2 1 INS 10011/11- 111" 000 10 11011101 Mar. RBF Labs= AVA Me ea 90000 17101101MI= KO 0111,0 Ei1RM MIK 6 10 r.'r lrc 0000 7110111. �.✓ r.mTaa1 CNC) 1 war or a NRR" 5 111 v. d ' oases MN BFC 439 L .. anewt_ _ — _ 7 2 ( 1111. 1110111.10100 (r. 3 4 0101. Mt VI f um 1v. 1 3,)0 ram=11-11 asw R— 1 ,24 cfcM- *_3• TRRNSITE PPE OPP.7 v rEseTv ISP LEGAL EE96OP1ON - PNIDN MOTELS POOL r. 10.r.,.43 .Rd lea 1.707-14IM 10011.114 1a41.41 EignaraZOTINAIMBASIM 11/1111L -,..a-.H,. EXAMELB.UCM 110.01 r. 111.107-.117 Ems. E--. t. 11a ,.00-.11414 lertrA3 r 4. laza u...mum"revue IRW.C1.......OUStF 4w vnmeast firm too 01111011-101011116 RoamPommyscrew 40 SOLE CENTER LINE VANE OATA _n....1111111111....-9111 Li.NM. J...4!0101.,.at7aiJS,i OASTS KAMM E LK OT THE NE 1/4 OT SECTION 23. TO:SL9ar 13 MORiti< RAKE 19 EMI REMM 00.2500' 111 43 SIN ON THE BOVWRV S4—,EY RECORDED U410E1 MDITOR3 ERE No. 70.47003 01. MOWS &YH/8 IT 1 -- 4»7 OW. w 1..W .uI di Vineyard Plat JEFFERt�O 400 0 V E 400 co crio 800 Feet Fire Hydrants • Union Gap • City of Yakima g Nob Hill g Private • Gleed Water Mains �A�/0-3 4 6 "18 10 12 A„ i 16 'NI18 20 v 24 N 48 54 INDEX .. / . '�I .1e4i V443 -o-, CITY OF YAKIMA REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 2002 TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner MAX LINDEN WASTEWATER DATE: July 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Master Land Use Application: UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. PROPOSAL: 17 Lot Long Plat. LOCATION: 218 N 32nd Avenue PARCEL NUMBERS: 181322-14493 through 14497 & 14515 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held August 7, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e-mail address is bbenson@ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6042. COMMENTS: Contact Department / Agency 'DOC,. INDEX DST PACKETS UAZO#L,f.,4 irt. 2 - o2 Applicant: Lin Date of Meeting: 3- 7- Z Z City of Yakima Divisions: --CCodes Codes, Codes Godes„ s Engineering Water/irrigation Wastewater/Utilities Fire Dept.. Fire Dept. 00.M../d• Others: Doug Maples Joe.OaNs4 Sandy Cox, COrOlyryBeffes KevinCallow Dave poyifii,1 Max Linden IViitCh Odle Jeff Pfaff 1,0{9Yakirria Tie* irrigation District 21 Nob Hill Water 22 yakirnalCountY sllealth District, 23 WA State Department of Ecology 24 N Yakima Conservation District Pacific Power & Light Co. ascade Natural Gas Co. sakirna School Distridt #7 WestsValley School District #208 Charter CorhnAhleaticns 31 County Clean Air Authority 32 Yakima Waste Systems 33 Yakima Greenway Foundation 34 ?oot 9#0, , 35 Yakima County 911 36,,Soil,,Conservatibn District, 37 Department of Wildlife 38:DepartMeht Of Natura Resocirses 39 Department of Transportation 40 Department:ot Fisheries' 41 Yakama Indian Nation 42 Yakima Airport . J- 43 Trolleys 44 City of Union Gap treets Parks &;Recreaticft 13 Transit 14 -police- „. 15 County Public Works 10, county planning, 17 Refuse Rick pipkef: and/or Preston Shepherd Art Mckuren Debbie Smith Ray Wopdprcheck Jim Moore Blake Davis Sheila Ross Bpn.Soria, Peter Ansingh Kevin Ohilcote, Les Ornelas S��ttRobrtsn Al Brown Oblpert'BillrigOydrth, Wayne Wantland Ray W PPO:§rPfi:06( Ted Clusing erry Harvester ' Bill Beckley Clem `- - Jerry Henderson Bill Rathbone APOri Pver!pPfl! John Rutter Dewse Nichols John Haddix Mike VoWell Vern Redifer 'Steve Erickson Nancy Fortier JohnDickman - 470 Camp 4 Rd:68.908 6111 Tieton Dr. 98908 104N, 1s1 St. 9890 • - 15 W. Yakima Ave. Suite 200 98902 1-606 Perry St Suite F 98902 1101 N. 16th Ave. 98902 2qd Ave. Rm 304 98902-, 401 N. 1st St. 98901 10 N. 4thAve„ 98902 8902 Zier Rd. 98908 10654 l6thAve 9890 6 S. 2nd St. Rm 1016 2812 Terrace keights Dr: 9890 111 S. 18th St. 98901 205 W,„WaShinblorfAve-.:089g3: YPD 1866,:p4itsi$1. $46;F 9602 1701 S. 24th Ave. 98902 713 9WerS-,Rd..01er4t4; WA 98926 2609 Rudkin Rd. Union Gap, WA 98903 , P.O. 13Cxc9155, 98909' P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 2400 kWaShingtOn Ave 98903 309 N. 35th Ave. 98902 p.O;13OX.3008-:,U ap, WA,198993 DOG, ND Ex CITY OF YAKIMA REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 2002 TO: City of Yakima Development Services Team FROM: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner DATE: July 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Master Land Use Application: UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, RAN VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. PROPOSAL: 17 Lot Long Plat. LOCATION: 218 N 32nd Avenue PARCEL NUMBERS: 181322-14493 through 14497 & 14515 Please review the attached site plan and prepare any written comments you might have regarding this proposal. This project will come up for discussion at the weekly DST meeting to be held August 7, 2002 at 9:30 a.m. As always, should you have comments, but find you are unable to attend please submit your comments prior to the meeting. My e-mail address is bbenson@ci.yakima.wa.us and the Planning Department's fax number is (509) 575-6105. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (509) 575-6042. COMMENTS: Contact Department / Agency DOGS, INDEX JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER D SEPA REVIEW EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE D-1 Environmental Checklist 7-8-02 D-2 Notice of Application & Request for Comments 7-23-02 D-3 Agencies contacted 7-23-02 D-4 Adjoining Property Owners notified 7-23-02 D-5 Affidavit of Mailing 7-23-02 D-6 Comment letter from Les Ornelas, Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority 7-24-02 D-7 Comment letter from Gregory G. Wristen, Cascade Natural Gas Co. 8-6-02 D-8 Comment letter from Gwen Clear, D.O.E., Yakima, WA 8-8-02 D-9 Determination of Nonsignificance 8-22-02 D-10 Notice of Decision, Compliance with the WA State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 8-22-02 D-11 Affidavit of Mailing 8-22-02 D-12 SEPA Parties of Record Notified 8-22-02 Last First Street City State Zip Jim 221 So. 19`x' Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Fickel Hordan Bill Debbie 410 No. 2°d Street 227 No. 34th Ave Yakima, Yakima, WA. WA. 98901 98902 Lewis McCullough Dennis 224 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902-2273 Resident 215 No. 33`d Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Foster Chuck 3207 W. Nob Hill Blvd Yakima, WA. 98902-4960 -+ GttES o W2, s i f Coast Cooa..LLAJ*T°- CAs .tom NJRT CAS 412 r •s 5840/ "} f, w E N Gi tMl r a w yMC MA Buz Cr -t i8' Vo a. -3'1a . STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: SEPA NOTICE 02/3' tea -3,,2-4' . I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Decision regarding a SEPA Checklist. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was mailed to public and private agencies and parties of record, which are individually listed on the mailing lists retained by the Planning Division. That said notices were mailed by me on the-2.2day of-th1,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine Wilson d2IG� V,4C_�3=6y- DEPARTMENT Or COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 e Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTICE OF DECISION Compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) August 22, 2002 On July 23, 2002 the City of Yakima, Washington issued a Notice of Application and Environmental Review regarding an Environmental Checklist Application submitted by Mr. Jim Fickel. The proposed project consists of the development of a 17 -lot residential subdivision on approximately 10 5 acres of R-1 zoned property located in the vicinity of 218 No. 32nd Avenue, Yakima, Washington. Parcel number: City File Number: 181322-14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497 & 14515 UAZO EC#13-02 Following the required 20 -day public comment period, and consideration of all comments received, the City of Yakima has issued the enclosed SEPA Threshold Deteiuiination. This Deteiniination may be appealed within 5 working days from the date of mailing. Appeals must be in writing and on forms available from the City of Yakima Planning Division, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. For further infoiniation or assistance, you may wish to contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509)575-6042 at the City Planning Division. Doug Maples Planning & Code Administration Manager Notice of Decision Mailing Date: August 22, 2002 Enclosures: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance Site Plan and Vicinity Map rl� Yakima W���7 A%199pp9 WASHINGTvIJ STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLKA'. ACT DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON August 22, 2002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of a 17 -lot residential subdivision on approximately 10.5 acres of land located in the R-1, Single -Family Residential and R-2, Two -Family Residential zoning districts. PROPONENT: Jim Fickle LOCATION: 218 N 32ND Avenue in Yakima, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima, UAZO EC #13-02 DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal, after reviewing the Environmental Checklist and related information, has determined that the project does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be required as provided under RCW 43.21C.030(2c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [ ] There is no comment period for this DNS. [ X ] This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-355, Optional DNS process. There will be no additional comment period for this DNS. You may appeal this determination pursuant to YMC §6.88.170 to the Yakima City Council, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima WA 98901 in writing no later than five working days after the end of the comment period. Be prepared to make factual objections. Contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner (509) 575-6042 for more information. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: William R. Cook POSITION/TITLE: Director, Community & Economic Development TELEPHONE: 509 / 575-6113 ADDRESS: 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 DATE: August 22, 2002' SIGNATURE: !NDEX 2- STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 15 West Yakima Avenue, Suite 200 Yakima. Washington 98902-3452 (509) 575-2490 August 7, 2002 Doug Maples City of Yakima 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 RECEIVED AUG 0 8 2002 CITY OF YAKIM., PLANNING DIV. Dear Mr. Maples: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the notice for the five related land use applications, proposed by Jim Fickel. We have reviewed the application and have the following comment. Toxics Clean up Based upon the historical agricultural use of this land, there is a possibility the soil contains residual concentrations of pesticides. Ecology recommends that the soils be sampled and analyzed for lead and arsenic and for organochlorine pesticides. If these contaminants are found at concentrations above the MTCA clean up levels Ecology recommends that potential buyers be notified of their occurrence. If you have any questions concerning the Toxics Clean-up comments, please contact Don Abbott at (509) 454-7838. Water Quality Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by storm water runoff. Sand, silt, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants. If you have any questions concerning the Water Quality comments, please contact Pat Irle at (509) 454-7864. Sincerely, 4 Gwen Clear Central Regional Office 662 NDE.x 3-S #61,) G,.. 3-0 Gregory G. Wristen Construction Coordinator 401 N. First St. Yakima, WA 98901 509/457-8175 fax509/457-8112 August 6, 2002 Mr. Bruce Benson City of Yakima 129 N. Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 RE: Summitview Vineyards Dear Mr. Benson, Upon review of the proposed Summitview Vineyards plat, Cascade Natural Gas Corporation can easily service this development from either N. 33rd Ave or N. 32nd Ave. After approval from the City of Yakima, we would look forward to meeting with the developer for contract signing and gas line scheduling and installation. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to ask. Sincerely, ft Grego Wristen Const u io Coordinator QCASCADE NATURAL GAS COR PON A T 1 0 N We make warm neighbors ,NDFx o7 J t� VA C -44-,S, 6 Z akima Regional Clean Air Authority July 24, 2002 Six So. Second St., Suite 1016, Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509) 574-1410, Fax: (509) 574-1411 http://www.co.yakima.wa.us/cleanair RECEIVEDL 3 RECEIVED \JU 0 2002 AUG 2002 PLANNING DIV. r' .` OF YA'° :A CITY OF YAKIMA Doug Maples, Planning Manager City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development City of Yakima 129 N. 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 PLANNING DI RE: UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02 218 No 32nd Avenue Dear Mr. Mapl While the rezones, replfats and vacations associated with these request themselves cause no air pollution, subsequent, permitted development will and is subject to air regulations. 1. Any renovations or demolitions of existing structures require a Notification of Demolition and Renovation to be filed with and approved by YRCAA is required. An asbestos survey must be completed, and all asbestos must be removed prior to demolition, per §3.07.F, G and H of YRCAA Regulations. 2. YRCAA regulations requires proponent to file with, and gain approval from YRCAA, a dust control plan to address demolition, site preparation, construction and landscaping phases cited in this project if the proponent should decide to build, per §3.08 of YRCAA Regulations. The fee for construction dust plan is $205. Proponent is encouraged to file a Master Construction Dust Control Plan for the year 2002. Thank you for your continued support. With your help and those of others we can continue to have clean and healthful air quality in Yakima County. Air Pollution Control Officer cc: Bill Hordan Gary Pruitt, YRCAA Enforcement Officer /chasm/wpfiles/permitting/SEPA/City_of_Yakima/Maples_32nd Ave_rezone_subdivision_24ju102 STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: Pre( Loy Pla--4-oma C t 2._.2-oa-� EC# )3-��, Pik' V4G*3-0D-(A- Adm, R-11- t4-0 zrlin, t c -K{' ( I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application and Request for Comments. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the c23 day of ZTEA Cy ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson I -S 8E0133 08 49 03 07-11-02 Parcel # Owner Name PARCEL BASIC INFORMATION LIST For List: r-w-vac3-02 Owner Address 181322-14022 181322-14023 181322-14026 181322-14027 181322-14030 181322-14031 181322-1Ii034 181322-14035 181322-14038 181322-14039 181322-14047 181322-14050 181322-14051 181322-14052 181322-14053 181322-14054 181322-14055 181322-14056 181322-144.00 181322-14401 181322-14402 181322-14403 181322-14404 181322-14406 181322-14407 181322-14408 181322-14409• 183.322-14410 181322-14411-- 181322-14412, 181322-14413 181322-14414 181322-14415 181322-14416 181322-,14417,, 181322-14418- ` 181322-1.4419' 181322-14420,, 181322-14421 181322-14422 181322-14423 181322-14424 181322-1,1429•'.'.; 181322,,14426,',- a81322,14427' 81322,,14426,• -•'181322-141k27' ('191322-14428 . 181322-14429 181322-14430 BETTY J. WIGHT DONNA J LOPAZE CARLEN J MAJNARICH BRIAN J BUSEY JAMES D. CARMICHAEL GLENN E & ROBYN R KLINGELE MARGARET MITCHELL JAMES A VANDERVATE LOUIS T & JACKIE E JOHNSON VICTORIA A SCHLUNEGER SCOTT A & D HOLBROOK BRUNS DANIEL R & MARIE C IVY CHARLES A.ETUX SCHMALING� DAVID L & CAROL A WOOD WILLIAM B & GLENDA P PETRIE RAY R. HOFF ALFRED G. MABRY ALISON A NOLZ PHIL & PENN SHELTON ROBERT J. `HENDERSON VIRGIL CLARK, TRUSTEE SANDRA J- :WESTWOOD PEDRO L & TRACY L CASE AROSTEGUI MATHEW D & JOY PETERSON NASARIO P CUEVAS SUSAN HEINTZ DALE E JOHNSON DALE E: JOHNSON WILFRED ETUX SGAMBELLURI STEVEN J & KACE'9 J ROYCE LUIS G & ANGELICA M MENDOZA KENNETH D, STEPHANIE WEYRICK DONALD W SUBLETT RICHARD & JODY DAVEY DONALD- W SUBLETT ROBERT & ANGIE ,GIRARD - ANGEL 'H'& CARIA V MALERO ROBERT,K & LA DONNA SCHOENGARTH ABRAHAM JR & JUDITH LOPEZ MARISOL BERMUDEZ MAX M & TAMMY IRWIN KEVIN NEUBERGER CHERYL. L, CLARK RODNEYA EELLS :MATTHEW &,CYNTHIA`TIBBETT JOHN. J.-"&' MARJORIE KEMPER _ CHARLES & SHELLEY GOERTLER JOHN P & KAY L RIGGS YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 989(12'' YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 - YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA,- Washington 98902 SELAH, Washington 98942-9505 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-2564 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2256-, YAKIMA, Washington,98902 BLAINE, Washington 98230' ; YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2217 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2217 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAICIMA, .Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2216 YAKIMA, Washington 98901 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2241 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA,: Washington,98902=2243 YAKIMA,,Washington 98902-2243'- YAKIMA,"Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902=2274 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98906 RAINIER, Oregon 97048 ,YAKIMA, Washington 90908- YAKIMA; Washington ,98902.-2240' YAKIMA,'WatYiington-:98902-2202 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2240 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 -'YAKIMA,Washingtoxi 98908-9767 YAKIMA,- Washington ;9'8902' YAKIMA;.-WasHiington; 98902 YAKIMA, Washington.98902-2242: YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 PE0133"'" 08:49:o3, Eem'cel,44 Owner Nathe ' PARCEL BASICINFliRMATION LIST FOr'JLIet: r,w-vao3,02 ' ' Owner Addree, • 181322-14431 181322-14433 181322,14434' 181322-14435 1813221-3.4436 181322-1443. 181322-14438 181322-14439 181322-14440 181322-14441 181322,14442 181322,14443 181322-14444 1181322-14445 181322-14446 181322-14447 181322-14448 181322-14449 181322-14450- 181322-14451 181322-14452 181322-14454 181322-14455 181322-14456 181322-14462 181322-14463 181322,-14464 ' 18132273.4465 , a81322,14466. 1813221446-7 181322-14470 181322-14471 181322-14473 181322-14474' .181322-14475, L81322-14476- 18-1322-1447711832Z-14478,' 181322-14479 181322-14480 181322-14481 181322-14482 181322,14483. 12.81322,14484%- 181322,-..3-4405 18132234486 151322-14487 181322-14488 JAMES E & MARY E CATON DAVID A".& 1INPA NELSON FRED'S, ALICE,SAKER, „ FRED & AL,ICE'EAKER DELORES'j-.'REYNOLPS.- DELORES J. REYNOLDS MICHAEL L & LAURIE V STUCKEL MICHAEL P & MURIEL E WATTS DONALD W. MONROE MIKE -Et- ET UX ANTONIO SHELLY 0 THOMAS, ' DEREK W & KAY D ' ANDREW 13, HOUSON. GREGG D & MARY K PLEGER WILLIAM M & SHIRLEY O'HARE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOC TRACY MACHART DENi4IS.&'SUSAN'L GOUGH - SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS' PATRICK 0 & CHERI-A .KEEPE,. TERRY'A WEEDIN" CHARLES 0 JR MARTIN JUDY K HENDERSON ELLA CRUCE THOMAS G & HELEN R LAMBERTON 9tIC}AE1Sh ROBERTS—. CHUNG,HONAI. GONG CHAN WAYNEABLISE:-.M STEINBACHER,. " DONALD1'ETUX1-PARMENTIMR, TORRES, JANICE & BENTZ, NANCY LEMKE, KARI L HEILMAN JASON D & SARA M UECKER EDWARDO C CHUA ROBERT 8 'DARLENE R'PAIRBROOK VERN R_ PETERSON, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 XAKIMA, Washi14ton,98902-72201 YAKIMA Washington 98902- - YARImA, Washington,;98902-,' 'YAKIMA, WashingtOn:98-902-,'' YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2203 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2203 YAKIMA, Wa.hington '98902 YAKIMA,, Washington, 98902',-, 'YAKIMA, Wa'shingtOn'98902 YAKIMA; Washifigtan,S8901. YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-8814 COLUMBUS, Ohio 43219 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2206 SELAH, Washington-589429206 YAKIMA Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Waehingon,989.02,2244 YAKIMA, WashingEbn.98902-2268, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2218 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 "YAKIMA; WaSEin*tan.98902-2218 YAKIMA, Wasiiing-tOn:98902 • YAKIMA, Washing -Eon 98902 -,, -YAKIMA, Washing1t6n '989O2-2254 - CHE YAKIMA, Washington 98908-5526 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 ' YAKIMA;Washinon. 98902-3728. . YAKIMA Washington .989.02,22-1-'9'" YAKIMA, WaS4ingto1( 98902" - Was4ingeen:,98902-2219 ' YAKIMA Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2219 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 YAKIMA,. Washi2ngtOnn98902,2273- YAKIMA, Waehl-ngt;on .989022273 YAKIMWeehingtOn COLORADO'SPRING861oreAlex.891173138-' YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2256 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-8914 .mATM,E,A,ALICEL.&'THOMAS1-T"CBRIEN+" ''MICHAEL:j.'s;.LAURA,M 6CLIPPERT GEORGE D & SANDRA G HELTON DONALD M. GAROUTTE HELEN M. HILLBERY DELBERT DALE MILLER •RaCHARD-T-ET:ABERGHOFF 1ELIZABETHrBLOOMEIELD, , WANNEiGLESLIEY1H&JOYCEM-TuRNER. SCOTT A & D HOLBROOK BRUNS PATRICIA 8 SUTPHEN 1-, • PE0133 , 08 49:03 07-11-02' Parcel # Owner ,Name PARCEL BASIC' INFORMATION,,LIST For,_List: r-w-vac3-02, Owner Address.:, Page 181322-14489 181322-14490 181322-14491. 181322-14492 181322-14493 181322-14.94 181322-14495 181322-14496 181322-14497 181322-14498 181322-14499- 181322-24500 181322-14501 181322-14502 181322-14503 181322-14504 181322-14505 181322-14506 181322-14507 181322-14508 281322-14509' 281322-14510' 181322-14511 181322-14512 181322-14513 181322-41001 187.322'-41t)02, . 181322,41003'r, 1813224=410.08•,1. 181322=41009;;, 181.322-41014 181322-41015 181322-41016 181322-41020 '181322-41449''• 1.81323'-23028- 181323=230229' 181323::23030 181323-23418 181323-23419 181323-23420 181323-23421 1.8.13 23 n2'3'424, 181323-234;25. _ L181$r23 -23426' 1'81323-23427 ... 181323-23428 181323-23429 KELLY 5 BLAIR LEANN QUNELL RALPH SHIVELY MATTHEW J & ERIN -T- AI0DERTON MICHAEL A SCULLY ' HOWARD H & M SHUMAN .. HOWARD"H- & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN STEPHAN D. ET UX SUTLIFF STEPHAN D. ET UX SUTLIFF EARL & DONNA JEAN CARROLL BARTON ROBERT W. BRADEN MASON H SOLOSABAL GREGORY B & SUZANNE FLUEGGE DONALD E. FARRELL DIANA T FRONTIS DENNIS J & AN SUK MC CULLOUGH JAMES E & AMANDA EGLIN JOANN MILLS G. BRUCE HOTCHKIS GREGGFRAZIER ROBERT D 5 SHIRLEY M WILKINSON YAKIMA COUNTY COMMISIONERS STEVE & DEBRA HAHN ROY JAMES ROBECIC DENNIS & DEBBIE MARTIN ,ALAN R"& RAETTA P'DAWS " ELAINE,M.a SHAWN. Y' CAMPBELL ._. RICHARD;.L- 5, LISA'K,BOHL CARL D & CARRIE LOU BEHLER JAMES ET UX DECCIO FRED H. ANDREWS PAULINO & ELVIA GONZALEZ -ALBERT.'J."MEAGHER THOMAS 5.,PLEASANTS , LARRY ,,E &_.HEATHER M MILLER, SCOTT'R_-&..CHANr L WASHST. t2_ THE SHOPKEEPER LTD JULIE M AMIS ROBERT JR & TONITA BERGER SPENCER FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BENITO E✓'CATHERINE' M'RAMIREZ RUSSELL'D &DONNA L SCOFIELD MARY.LEE RUTLEDGE -DEAN M CJR WOOD ROBERT L & RHINDA CLEM JEANA JOHNSON YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 98502.--„r-' .. _ YAKIMA, Washington 98902 CAMANO ISLAND, Washingtbn,'98292.-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washingt6n 98292-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2219 YAKIMA, Washington -98902,-,2219 YAKIMA, Washingt01 98902-2219 YAKIMA.', Washirigton 98902=2219 YAKIMA,,, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 SELAH, Washington 98942 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 98902= YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98901 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA,- .Washington 98902;-2253'' YAKIMA; Washington. 98902-2253 YAKIMA, Washington, 989,02. YAKIMA, Washington., 98902` YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2255 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2255 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2287 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 ^'YAKIMA,. Washiiigtoh.,i98,9025225..7 „YATCIMA,-" Wash7.ngton; 198902, YAKIMA,- Washington -98902 YAKIMA, Washingtor};;98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA:. Washington -989t2.' YAKIMA,sWaShirigton.+;9890'2 "'-•- YAKIMA,' Washington• 98902-2334 YAKIMA, -Washington 9890,2> YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 9E0133 084903 07-11-02 - Parcel # • ,Owner Name. ,! PARCEL BASIC INFORMATION LIST 1 ' For List: r-w-vac3-02 - Owner Address' 181323-23430 MAXINE R. MC AULEY 181323-23431 KERRY A & GINA M MARTIN 181323-23432 iBEVS'IlLt C WILSON- 181323-23433 SALLY S MAYO - 181323 -23434 . JENNIFER E SMITH, 181323-23435 -,, .TODD,E BERTI4AN',',-4' i! 181323-23436 LINDA S JAMESON 181323-23439 DONALD E. ET UX REAM 181323-23440 DENNIS RAY 181323-23441 ALTHEA FAIN 181323-23442 DEPT OF HUD 181323-23443 TERRY W. NOWLIN , 181323-23444 JACK CURTSINGER 181323-23445 JOHN W. HILL 181323-23446 NYE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 181323-23447 MATTHEW E STEPHENS 181323-23448 CHUCK & MARDI FOSTER 181323-23498 SHEILA MARIE BURNS 181323-23489 SANDRA d PACE 181323-2356.0 ALVIN R. ET UX TIBBETT 181323-2350,1 KAREN A DAVIS 181323-2350.2 KENNETH L & FRANCES ROSE 181323-23503 JAMES M & SHIRLEY A PECHTEL 181323-23504 CHRISTINE T ROBERTS 181323-23505 SALLY GAMBLE 181323-23506 BURT G SHELBY 181323-23507 MIKE K & KATHY,L KOVATCH , 181323-23508 JERRY -L. & NITA M."PUTAS . ., 181323-23509 ROBERTS & CARLA J HARCUM •' , 181323-23510 RICHARD N & MARION -8 ,CARLSON . 181323-23511 MARK J & MARTHA BURNS 181323-23512 LARRY L. ET UX TURNER 181323-23514 TERRY MC KENNA 181323-23517 RUSSELL J & ANGELA L MOQUIN 181323-23518 ! , ELEANOR G HARD.ING 181323,32497,. -WALDON R,, STANLEY,,,,,,' 181323-32498'Z 4,,'VICKIE,,YNIGHTREED'-' .18132332499•,. •BLAKE,&:.STISETTE ESPINOZ.A.T1,1,,,..,,. Total Number of Parcels: 182 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-1677 YAKIMA, WashingtOn'98902 YAKIMA; Vasliington 98902 YAKIMA, 'Washington.,98902,' 7 YAKIMA, Wa=q-lingtOn,'98902' YAKIMA, Washington 989022213 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2308 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 IRVINE, California 92612 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2333 YAKIMA, Washington .98802 YAKIMA, Washington '98902,2333, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-1239 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 • ” YAKImA, Washington 98902-2335 SELAH, Washington 98942 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2336 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902, - YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Mnshington, 98902, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-3424 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, ,Washih.gtOn'98902,2723 ,YAKIMA,, Washington .98902" , _ YAKIMA, Washington 98902, • Army Corps P.O. Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Sheila Ross Cascade Natural Gas 401 N 1st St. Yakima, WA 98901 Chamber of Commerce 10N9th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Paul Burlingame City of Union Gap PO Box 3008 Union Gap, WA 98903 Les Ornelas Clean Air Authority 6 S. 2nd St., Room 1016 Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. John Daly Dept. of Agriculture 406 Gen. Adin Bldg. Mai Stop AX -41 0 pia, WA 98504 Debbie Smith Dept of Ecology 15 W. Yakima Ave. St. 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Depar r ent of Ecology, iron Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Dept of Emergency Services 4220 E Martin Way Olympia, WA 98504 Mr. Ted Clusing Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1701 So. 24th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Dept of Natural Resources 713 Bowers Rd Ellensburg, WA 98926 Mr. Paul Donahue Dept of Soo/Health Service Capital Programs Ofc. Bldg#2, MS OB -23B Olympia, WA 98504 Dept. of Health Michelle Vazquez 1500 W. 4t Ave. St. 305 Spokane, WA 99204 Dept of Transportation 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 3` vironmental Protection Agency 200 6th Ave, MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 FAA 2200 W Washington Yakima, WA 98903 Interagency Committee Outdoor Recreation P.O. Box 40917 Olympia, WA 98504-0917 Nob Hill Water Co 6111 Tieton Dr Yakima, WA 98908 Pacific Power Ricky L. Walker 1101 N. 16th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Planning & Com Affairs Agency 9th & Columbia Bldg. MS GH -551 Olympia, WA 98504 Mr. Greg Griffith Div of Archeol & Hist Pres PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 WA State Attorney Gen. Office 120 S 3rd St #100 Yakima, WA 98101 Mr. Richard Smith Terrace Heights Sewer Dist 314 N 2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Ms. Millie Will U.S. West 8 So. 2nd Ave. Rm 304 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima Co. Commissioners Room 416 Courthouse Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Co Health Dist Art McKuen 104 North 1st St Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Richard Anderwald Yakima Co Planning 128 N 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Vern Redifer Yakima Co Pub. Works 128 N 2nd St Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima Greenway Foundation 111 So. 18th St. Yakima, WA 98901 Mr. Caroll Palmer Yakama Indian Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 `�3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 ® Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATE: July 23, 2002 TO: Applicant, Adjoining Property Owners, and SEPA Reviewing Agencies FROM: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes and Planning Division SUBJECT: Notice of Master Land Use Application concerning property located at 218 N 32nd Avenue UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. NOTICE OF APPLICATION The City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic Development has received five related land use applications from Mr. Jim Fickel. The first application requests the subdivision of approximately 4.5 acres of property into 17 Lots (this property is predominately zoned R-2, Two Family Residential with the remainder being R-1, Single - Family Residential.) The second application requests Class (2) land use review for the construction of five duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of the subdivision. The third application requests a five-foot adjustment of the rear yard setback standards of the R-1 zoning district. The fourth application requests the vacation of the unbuilt portion N 33rd Avenue (the adjacent property owners along Jefferson Avenue have joined in this application), and the final application involves Environmental Review, a state requirement. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509) 575-6042 or e-mail at bbenson@ci.yakima.wa.us. REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS Your views on this proposal are welcome. All written comments received by August 12, 2002 will be considered prior to the issuance of a final recommendation on these applications. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. C Yakima Ni,,./E> �' �� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is to notify all public and private agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise that the City of Yakima Division of Environmental Planning has been established as the lead agency, pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the above stated project: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This application requires that the City of Yakima's Hearing Examiner hold an open record public hearing on this matter. You will be notified when the hearing date has been set. Other Permits Required: City building permits, street break permit and clean air permit. Encl: Narrative, Site Plan, and Vicinity Map. Environmental Checklist is included for SEPA reviewing agencies only. 2 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No. Date: June 26, 2002 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Jim Fickle Phone Number: (509) 248-9275 Address of Proponent: 221 South 19th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 2. Person Completing Form: Bill Hordan Phone Number: (509) 249-1919 Address: 410 North 2nd St , Yakima, WA 98901 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Yakima -- Dept. of Community and Economic Development. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: The Plat of Summitview Vineyards. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) : The project is proposed to start in the Fall of 2002. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any -environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A long plat application was previously submitted for this property but was never completed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No known applications are pending which affect this proposal. -1- INDEX 1- ( 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Preliminary long plat approval Class 2 Review Administrative Adjustment Right-of-way vacation Building permits Road approach permit Utility connection permits Transportation Capacity Analysis 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is to subdivide approximately 2.5 acres of Two-family Residentially zoned property into 12 residential lots, construct 5 duplexes on 5 existing lots currently zoned Single-family Residential through Class 2 Review and vacate and relocate an existing right-of-way. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The address of the property is 218 North 32nd Avenue, Yakima, WA. 13. Taxation Parcel No.(s): 181322-14493 to 14497 and 14515. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General rolling, description of the site (circle one) : F at. hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,others) 5io/2L- the steepest slope on the site (approximate slope) ? b. What is percen t Approximately 3 to 5 percent. -2- c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the Soil Survey of Yakima County Area Washington, the property has soil types of: Ritzville Silt Loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes. The soil is not classified as prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling is required. Some minor grading will be needed to level the building pads and roadways for residential construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, con- struction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some minor blowing dust could occur during the construction the leveling process. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building)? Approximately 35 to 45 percent of the property will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sprinklers and a water truck will be on-site during site preparation to control blowing dust. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction -- exhaust from earth moving equipment. After construction -- minor automobile exhaust. Quantities are not known, but should be minimal. - 3 - b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Sprinklers and a water truck will be on-site during site preparation to control blowing dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: No. No. 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity -of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: No. 1. Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general descrip- tion, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural, etc.) . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) : 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) . Where will the water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Drainage trenches will be used to control stormwater runoff within the plat. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See c. above. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs b. grass pasture XX crop or grain wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other XX other types of vegetation -- WEEDS What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing pear trees and all the weeds will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on if any: New residential landscaping (grass and tress) planted as residential structures are completed. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been on or near the site or are known to be on or site: b. or other the site, will be observed near the Bird: hawk, heron, eagle, (songbird;) other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is this site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. -6- d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for residential energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Residences will be constructed to Uniform Building Code and the State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be needed. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? No known noises in the area will affect this proposal. - 7 - 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term -- Normal construction noises associated with residential construction. Long-term -- Some minor traffic noise should be expected. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Compliance with the City Noise Ordinance. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is generally vacant, but for a small stand of pear trees and an old shop. The surrounding properties are all used for residential purposes. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, the property was previously planted in orchard. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site currently contains a dilapidated 3 -bay shop. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the 3 -bay shop will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Part of the property is zoned R-1 and part is zoned R-2. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Low and Medium Density Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 85 people would live in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people will be displaced. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. 9. HOUSING a, Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle- or low-income housing. Seventeen duplexes will be provided. They will be middle- income housing units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. No units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed struc- ture(s), truc- ture(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of any particular residence could be approximately 24 feet. The principle exterior building material is expected to be masonite, wood and brick. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No known views will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Normal night-time lighting associated with residential usage can be expected. It will mainly occur at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No known off-site sources of light or glare affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Night-time lighting will be directed inward and downward to the best of the developer's ability to prevent light and glare from leaving the site. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Franklin Park, Robertson School, Gilbert School and Nob Hill School are located in the general vicinity of the proposed plat. Formal and informal recreational activities have been observed at these locations. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any -places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The subject property is served by North 32nd and 33rd Avenues, which in -turn connect to several urban arterials in the area. These arterials eventually connect to the Interstate system. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, 1 block to the south. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have four parking spaces for each duplex. This equates to 68 parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways. If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) . Yes, the project will require new local access streets be provided to serve the interior of the development. The roadways will dedicated to the City upon adoption of the plat. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the ITE Manual, this project will generate .62 p.m. peak period vehicle trips per unit for a total of 21.08 peak p.m. period trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other?) If so, generally describe. No increased need is expected. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle the utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, irrigation, cable TV, drains, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No new utilities are proposed, general construction activities will include trenching associated with extending existing utilities. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Proponent or erson Completing Form JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER E Correspondence / Comment Letters Received EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE E-1 Letter from Steve Sutliff, 217 — 219 N. 34th Ave. 8-5-02 E-2 Letter from Earl & Donnajean Barton, 223 N. 34th Ave. 8-8-02 E-3 Letter and Petition from adjoining property owners 8-9-02 E-4 Letter from Robert and Victoria Braden, 225 N. 34tH Ave. 8-9-02 E-5 Letter from Debra Lewis, 227 N. 34tH Ave. 8-10-02 E-6 Letter from William B. Petrie, 3211 Summitview Ave. 8-12-02 E-7 Letter from Chuck Foster, 3207 W. Nob Hill Blvd. 8-12-02 E-8 Letter from Vern R. Peterson, 213 N. 34th Ave. 8-23-02 E-9 Letter from Don Parmentier 9-12-02 E-10 Letter from Bob & Rhinda Clem 9-12-02 September 12, 2002 Hearing Examiner: RECEIVED SEP 12 2002 CITY LW' YeaNiviti PLANNING AIV, I have lived at 221 North 32nd Avenue for 26 years. In that time, the Shuman property, west of our property, has been mostly a large, empty lot. Although there is a small orchard and a house on the property, we have endured years of dust, pollen, and overgrown weeds from the field. I have seen Mr. Fickel's layout plans for the property and concur with his concept for its use. Putting duplexes throughout the property makes sense to me. It will allow Mr. Fickel, as the owner, to control such things as pets, unsightly yards, abandoned vehicles, etc. My wife and I agree with Mr. Fickel's proposal. Bob Clem Rhinda Clem Filed Hearing Examiner H # E /° Date q/(2— a)- -' W ,,z; ,;f 3 —oma September 12th Planning Committee Meeting Yakima City Hall Council Chambers RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2002 CITY OF YAKIM . NNING Alla L Introduction. My name is Don Parmentier and these are We/The residents of No. 33rd Ave. are here, not to oppose the proposed development in total, but to make our views known. We believe the original planners had a specific plan in mind when this parcel was first platted. No. 33rd Ave. has been a half -block long, dead-end street since 1952 when Mr. Mabry built his house, the first on the street. Most of the houses are 195O's and 6O's era, except for mine and one other which were built in 1973. The most recent residents are the Lamberton's, who purchased here precisely because of the dead-end nature of 33rd. So, we are talking about 40 years of living in an extremely quiet neighborhood, one with very little traffic. In fact, I would seriously doubt the total in and out traffic for even the busiest of days would exceed 20 trips. The plan for this development, that the developers have presented, would seriously impact this neighborhood. H. Specific Content A. Vacation of No. 33rd Ave. at Jefferson Ave. 1. purpose to gain an extra lot 2. creates congestion a. loses 3rd route out of development b. loses 2nd access to 32nd Ave. c. loses additional routes to Lincoln and Summitview d. loses access to 34th Ave. e. loses additional routes to Lincoln and Summitview B. Congestion .f-iiA/VAC4P--.1— a 1. No. 33rd Ave. & Summitview Ave., presently a. certain times of day one waits several minutes to gain access to Summitview b. proposed development would cause traffic jam on No. 33rd at those times, and possibly other times 2. winter conditions on No. 33rd Ave. a. due to grade of 33rd, very difficult to access Summit - view when conditions are slick b. residents have to shovel snow out of mouth of 33rd to access Summitview in winter c. winter conditions makes this a very dangerous route for excessive traffic created by the development d. most residents have at least one 4x4 for this purpose C. R-1 verses R2 1. Developers want change to R-2 to gain more units a. developers only contacted those current residents who, they thought, would be affected by this development b. developers did not contact any on No. 33rd 1. including those two residents adjacent to the development D. Proposal 1. Don't vacate access to Jefferson Ave. 2. R-1 lots to remain R-1 3. Because of difficulty gaining access to Summitview, No. 33rd should remain a dead-end, but a fire -lane, only El /214 Pi If/ a % Y r /(r 1 /3'yJofy 124/i', A%ly' /NCI- / u/ �% / °iv :j/ / —7 ,4l'Y/f AI Ti ° f • ,'-' i s c 1.1 t it/ ,''J'"A/s' w AUG 2 7 2002 CITY OF Y. KI tMA PLANNING DIV /f:J /, #/ L. ci .t T /V l .!l p /-/2 7-- /! %P. A' 6 AZ. CS7 I i t �� 0 i j.y / JCA "AlLe e 1:A/ ir' . i /3 Y pp-1-( Afi C "0,4- "*.- • 1-2-- a ••• 2-1(f )Vo. 2 AC, • ,) Mr. Doug Maples I am not neeessarily against the development of this property, but I do have one major concern. The additional amount of traffic this would add to North 32" Avenue would cause an even bigger traffic hazard than there is now. As it is right now, I have seen several cars get side swiped, almost run off the road, and I have seen cars almost hit parked cars because the road is too narrow and the asphalt drops off a lot on the edges. This throws all the vehicles that use this road into a very dangerous situation. I feel that 32nd Avenue should be addressed first by widening the road and improvements to the sidewalks made. Again, I feel the width of North 32nd Avenue should be addressed first before this subdivision can be granted. Thank you, Chuck Foster RECEIVED AUG 1 2 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA. PLANNING DIV iNDEX Ei Le_ 1,4 ILLSIOR011 10 LEON DEECIIIPION - OMNI RIMS rarer rot =WM NOW OIL ON OPUS R-1 POOL Rim 1411.1=-1.110 Ergamdzw.nramt raKZ. 1MEO-1.1. Erranard=frAJM ZIJS21 rfflooll. t_ -l.0 efienar41217k211:21W1, Orr kla .11= -IS Ereallietir I =II real. No 11.3.1-irarr EZNVEREE=Malla IWO. Ma almaar-ar•EIVED ifi7h3r" Tarr, o err rat Of wearer AUG 1 2 2002 DE ADMINISTRATI r eV asn. AAR 2 3 6 IMO tr. 'MO V. .11a 4 9./. ir! Mar arara . ornam raw r Ir. L -L-r R - 1 p/v) AUG 1 "*. 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. TRANSITE P ORR.) 7:11AMM etlaIlkt MOM/ r aro. or raw armor yr • 010.1114•00.102.10.Bas INS MOH allosalSOM•ei RESWITht WilegfA( Simon AO TONE CENTER ME CURVE DATA ICIIINEKAIIIIIL.,.111111SKPAIIIIINS PAIN RASIS Of REAR:NM EAST LAW Of 'ME NE 1/4 Of SECTION 22. Ti 13 =wry RANCE TSC 00.25120- W AS S140204 ON THE %Ryer RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS nu NA. 2043003 1.-ar Of break, ) 2.2 LararoarNsar-r J. 13001 0.19 13002 079 14005 0.17 13003 0.19 13004 019 13005 0.19 13008 0.19 14008 1 53 P1 Jo a 14 56 • 14 ' 14414 3 23514 12 14412 23512 14010 0.16 14012 14011 0.16 14013 14014 037 13007 2 14401 14400 3059 3068 3057 3056 0.21 13055 3054 13053 13052 13061 13050 13049 14044 14017 0.14 9 14492 14514 0.19 23029 14020 0.14 14021 0.14 14022 14024 0.14 14025 034 14023 075 14491 19 14511 12 14504 13 14505 14028 14500 2 `. 14494 r= 3 ;t 14495 72771.33 14028 017 14027 0.15 14510 14506 7 14489 13048 13047 13046 0.21 14029 0.17 14030 0.16 14509 14031 14507 14498 14508 14485 14475 14497 14462 2 7277133 10 2 Q z 2 14484, 9 RIC 14066 0.17 14055 0.17 14053 0.95 14054 0.90 14470 14488 1g8a4 14488 1406 0.10 1405 0.10 14513 22 s`= 4 %'.e P-7 ryt z i4; t1r, ti2 le: 1 ” = 200 feet 41450 e:,,, -;�„., •��r'�.;{;. ±: �"ttJ�y .:1.3x* �"c`� �_e �r cr..j£'-�i+ y✓i .mak ., M �. In awe Iaesaaomaot oil Seat p gThe Yakima County Agesseott .t Office doai id. M t row►ro 0.15 0.43 112 bOCW'acy - • 0.22 0.27 02faa en std l the 144 41020 41016 • and RECEIVED AUG 1 2 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA izn5 r'e &A.i 1 PLANNING DIV: F1 C-4 Aug 10, 2002 RECEIVED RECEIVED Bruce Benson, City Planner AUG 1 2 2002 Doug Maples, Mgr. Bldg. Codes & Planning Division City of Yakima, Dept of Community & Economic Div.CITY OF YAKIMA AUG 1 2 2.00a 129 North 2nd St. PLANNING DIV, coDE A1)11,411,115111Kno Yakima, WA 98901 RE: Response to Notice of Master Land Use Application regarding property located at 218 N. 32nd Ave. UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, RNV VAC #3-02, UAZO EC #13-02. Dear Sirs: My property borders the proposed project listed above. I just moved to the neighborhood 1 month ago. When I first became interested in the property, 1 noticed the empty lot behind the house. This lot was my only concern when deciding to purchase. Consequently, I instructed my realtor to investigate the future use of the property. Her findings were that 5 upscale single-family homes were to be built on lots 12-17 — lots directly behind my new home. My previous home was located on West Washington, which is very busy and loud. I sought out a home that I hoped would be quite the opposite — a quiet neighborhood of established homeowners who take pride in their property. Renters do not take pride in their property. Jamming 17 duplexes on the tiny lot behind my house would cause a tremendous increase in noise, pollution and may raise the crime rate in the neighborhood. My hopes of increased property value and serenity would be squashed should the subject property proposal be approved. It is my feeling that the subject property stay at R1 with a buffer to single family in order to keep property values up. It is my understanding that if we do not agree to the 5 -foot administrative adjustment, the applicant is threatening to erect two-story units in lieu of the one-story duplexes. Either way, the applicant's proposal will infringe on my view, my privacy and my hopes to retain and increase the value of my home. The applicant's "retirement" plan for him and his wife is solely in his best interest and not in that of the neighboring community. Sincerely, Debra Lewis 227 N. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 -DOC; INDIES( August 9, 2002 Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Re: Application of Jim Fickel, 218 N. 32' Ave. Dear sir: We have very recently been advised of the application for a change in the variance on the property behind our home. We are writing to tell you that we do have some serious concerns about this proposal. The request was to move the structures that are to be built on the property on North 33rd Ave. closer to the back line including a ten foot patio behind the residence. This would shorten the backyard of the residences and bring them extremely close to our property. We feel this will encroach on our property and our privacy to a degree that would really change the use of our backyard and the value of our property. It is our request that the duplexes be moved to within 18 feet in front and have a set back of 18 feet in back for lots 14 and 15. It would be aesthetically appropriate to have different setbacks for each residence on the west side of N. 33rd Ave. Also, we are upset that we were not informed in 1998 when the property east of N. 33rd Ave. was zoned R-2 and therefore not given the opportunity to respond to that change. Please keep us informed of any future changes and hearings that will deal with this matter. Recel\k/e1) GO 03tmlosi —11°14 Sincerely, L/ • -S Robert and and Victoria Braden 225 N. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA. 98902 RECEIVED AUG 1 2 2002 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV 'DOC - INDEX I Vict, 0 The Property Owners and Dwellers North 33rd. Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Doug Maples Mgr. Building Codes and Planning Divisions 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2002 CITY QF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Re: Master Land Use Application at 218 North 32nd. Avenue by Jim Fick& and Bill Lynch Dear Sir. It is apparent from the information provided to the Manager of the Building Codes and Planning Divisions and forwarded to us, the property owners on 33rd. Avenue, that the applicants made special effort to address the concerns of certain adjacent property owners. But, we who would be most affected by the congestion and traffic of this proposed development were definitely not contacted. Therefore, we are using your invitation to express our views in writing and hope that they will be given consideration prior to the issuance of your final recommendation. It is our contention that since North 33rd. Avenue, which is no more than a half a block in length, has been a dead-end street and definitely not a through street for more than four decades, it should remain such. And even if it were to exist in its complete length to Jefferson, it still would not qualify as a through street. Therefore, we object to the vacation of the North non -existing part of 33rd Avenue because the proposal discriminates against the property owners who live along the long, existing portion of North 33rd. Avenue. It is stated by the applicants that the vacation of North 33rd. Avenue will enhance traffic circulation and ensures that incompatible traffic from the duplex area will not mix with the traffic from the surrounding neighborhood. Once again, the applicants apparently forgot about or consider the property owners who reside on the existing North 33rd. Avenue not affected by their action. Regarding Required Information, Article 2, subsection c., the applicants state that this project will help develop a transportation system that provides a wide range of efficient, safe and economical alternatives for movement of people and goods within, to and from the Yakima Urban Area. We question how an enclosed road, a block and a half long, that is not an arterial road can accomplish this. In Article 2, subsection d. of the Required Information, the applicants state that this project is the development of the last undeveloped properties in this area. Then, they reason that the vacation and relocation takes into account existing and anticipated development and c 1NUEX lAtkiSM*17 proposes to serve the neighborhood as a whole, rather than the individual development itself. They further state that the new roadway will serve all existing and proposed Tots in the area and once completed, the developers' road will become part of the city system. Here we have several questions If this is the last of the developments in this area, then how does this benefit anticipated development? If the vacation is approved, how does this proposal serve existing lots? And finally, why does the proposed street have to revert to the city for maintenance at taxpayers expense? Why can't the developers maintain their own roadway? The developers are requesting a change in the setback requirements of the R-1 Lots, which are to be changed to R-2 per their request. If the change is not granted they will be forced to build two-story units instead of single -story units. We question if it is wise to even change the present zone classification, let alone change the setback requirement. The developers further state that this proposal is in the best interest of the community because it meets the housing needs of the community. We question, in Tight of the excess of rental property in Yakima and the amount of homes listed for sale, if that statement is in fact true. Finally, if the City approves of all the applications requested by the developers, we property owners along the current North 33rd. Avenue request a change. Each duplex will have four parking spaces which translates into a potential of 68 automobiles needing to get out of the complex everyday. Currently, this street has nowhere close to a fraction of that amount of traffic. Therefore, we request that the City limit the development's access to 33rd. Avenue to that of an emergency fire lane as it has done at Burning Tree Estates. We understand that if this is done the main entrance and exit to the development will necessarily be from 32nd. Avenue, which is truly a main arterial for this area. We, the undersigned 33rd. Avenue property owners, respectfully submit these views: See attached signature page and addendum. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ,Signature Page ) I 3 3 - (9/4t S34"4/4. itY 12. tAtAr • '1,e -A q) // /\/ 3 71-7 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. \)1 7yzr 33 labo,s 6r\ a '21,5'1\1,3-3( Addendum We the undersigned do not want the increased cars and trucks using 33rd. Ave. We have three disabled people living on this street, and we don't want the hassel of the extra traffic. Where would the sidewalks be located? There is no room to for sidewalks on 33rd. L.T. Carey P.A. Carey P.A. Carey A.M. Carey Aug. 8, 2002 HECEiVt LJ AUG 1 2 2002 CITY OF VAKI M A PLANNING DLV. Bruce Benson, City Planner Doug Maples, Mgr. Bldg. Codes & Planning Division City of Yakima, Dept of Community & Economic Div. 129 North 2nd St. Yakima, WA 98901 RE: Response to Notice of Master Land Use Application Re Property located at 218 N. 32nd Ave. UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02. UAZO ADM ADJ # 10-02, Rill VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. Dear Sirs: Our property abuts the above project. See that project's Exhibit 1, Lot 16. We are senior citizens in our retirement years, and are making mortgage payments on our home. We selected our home as it is in a quiet, clean-cut RESIDENTIAL single-family NON -DUPLEX, NON -RENTAL neighborhood. We desire the subject property go to R1 with a buffer to single family in order to keep neighboring property values up. The subject property development is a proposal to jam 12 residential lots and construct 5 duplexes on 5 existing lots which are currently zoned single family residential through Class 2 review. The total proposal consists of 17 lots and 17 duplexes or 34 dwelling units in a single-family residential neighborhood. As this is inconsistent with the existing neighborhood, this will decidedly change the quiet posture of the existing neighborhood, and decrease the property value of the now existing single family properties. Only reason tells a prudent thinking person that the subject property will add as many as 68 cars and 68 residents and (?) pets — all funneled into a small space in this neighborhood with no plans for expansion of local access street, being 32nd street; perhaps other major streets as well. Again, this makes the project incompatible with the neighborhood and surrounding neighborhoods, not to mention what it does to the quality of our air space. The subject property proposes to provide a cul-de-sac. This only serves for turning around and for fire safety. It doesn't add any advantage to accessing a major street, other than to aim the car in the right direction. Aug. 8, 2002 Letter To City Planner, Bruce Benson -- 1 1D _" �. "1_ -02 The subject property proposes to add appropriate sightscreening to be established along adjoining properties as determined by the zoning ordinance and the Reviewing Official. That doesn't tell existing homeowners what to expect. And, what about the administrative adjustment of 5 feet being requested to keep the duplexes single -story? This 5 -ft adjustment is requested for the rear yard setback of Lots 13 through 17 of the proposed plat. That 5 -foot adjustment supposedly will keep the height of the buildings down and keep the development compatible with the adjoining residences, This is a matter of opinion and ignores the real iesue of merging homeowners and renters into one block. Homeowners take pride in their property. Renters do not take that same pride in homeownership. The subject property proposal is forcing us homeowners to accept the backside of single-family rental units with tiny patios — which, we believe, are conducive to Home Depot tool sheds and garbage cans, Five feet puts the subject property resident too close to us and we've been told that our only choice for more space is a two-story unit. Either way — a single -story or a two-story unit — IF this project becomes a reality, there needs to be a sightscreen between the subject property and the existing homeowners, like us. We should not have to pay for that expense. In today's poor economy, it is not easy for retired homeowners to be making over $1,000 a month mortgage payments. And it is poor planning for the city to permit this kind of project. From the viewpoint of homeowners in this block, the proposal is in the best interest of the buildersldeveiopers, rather than the homeowners. We question the necessity of so many dwellings on the subject property. It appears that the proposed buildings will be so jammed in, there's little room for Landscaping, or maybe a postage -stamp Lawn. Finally, we question why we were not informed of the R-2 zoning before now. Sine‹ae,p4eyvf(i cerely, (; / Earl & Donnajean Barton 223 N. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 453-8443 E -Mail: EarIB4@aol.com Aug. 8, 2002 Letter To City Planner, Bruce Benson -- 2 RECENEo AUG 0 2.002 MY OF • PLANNING Doug Maples Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions 129 No 2nd St. Yakima, Washington 98901 August 5, 2002 Subject: UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, R/W VAC #3-02, UAZO EC #13-02 Regarding land use applications ofJim Fickel and subsequent request by Fickel for Class 2 review to change R-1 to R-2. Fickel wishes to change R-1 to R-2 on the Westside of No 33rd Ave., so it will be a transition from the current R-2 designation on the Eastside of the 33rd Ave. I think that leaving it R-1 would be a better transition and provide a better buffer to the existing R-1. The affected property sits to the west of proposed lots 13-14. I own the 2 lots west of proposed lots 16 and 17. My lots sit considerably higher than the lower property and thus the views from the back porch area would be looking down into the new proposed duplexes. The requested adjustment in set back of 5 feet, along with the proposed building size with a proposed 10 foot patio will literally put the people within 5 feet of my back yard, much to close for an adjacent R-1 property. Duplexes do not lend themselves to desirable R-1 compatibility. Buy their very nature they are not prone to reliable upkeep. Tenants changing all the time make it hard for the units to be properly maintained. There is not as much pride in ownership when you rent, as there is when you own. Mr. Fickel states in his written narrative for the Class 2 Review that he wants to mitigate the impact to the surrounding neighbors. The proposed reduction of 5 feet of set back does not help the mitigation; it only puts the buildings, patios and people closer to the existing property. The proposal to keep the duplexes to single story will indeed mitigate the impact. He also says appropriate sightscreening will be established. I am concerned about what kind of sightscreening he would be able to use on 5 feet of land that would keep our view of the duplexes back yard and porch screened and the duplex view of our back porch screened. It would have to be a pretty high screen. Do )NDEX As Mr. Fickel states he wishes to create a buffer between the R-2 and R-1 areas. I feel the best buffer would be to leave the current R-1 designation as it is and for Mr. Fickel, since he wants to mitigate the impact to limit the single family lots to single story single family units. Leaving the lots R-1 will allow for a buffer zone that truly addresses the concerns of my neighbors and myself. Will allow for single family residences that would be more in line with the current use. Continued R-1 designation will provide houses that owners will own and thus have more pride in ownership. After having had a meeting with the neighbors and Mr. Fickel the evening of 8-5- 02 he assures us that he has no intention of building 2 story duplexes if he is allowed the 5 foot adjustment. The adjustment is necessary to allow him the room to keep the units single story. He intends to situate the units as far forward in the lots as possible and to build fences as high as code allows serving as buffers. He also intends to make the units high end and hold ownership as an investment to his future retirement. He assures us that the units will not become run down and that the tenants will be those who will most likely take care of the units because of the higher rent. I still would like to see R-1 in the area but would also not like to see 2 story units. Allowing the R-2 designation with the assurance that there will be no 2 -story units may be the most desirable. I know that this is not guaranteed. Steve Sutliff 217 - 219 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, Washington 98902 (509) 453-6476 JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER F APPLICATIONS EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE F-1 Application for Vacation of Public Streets or Alleys 7-8-02 F-2 Class (2), Administrative Adjustment and Preliminary Subdivision Applications 7-8-02 CITY OF YAKIMA: LAND USE APPLICATIONRECEIVED N� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 0 8 2002 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98901 VOICE: (509) 575-6183 FAX: (509) 575 -6105 CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING DIV. Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process call, come in person or refer to the accompanying instructions. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CERT'IF'ICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information specific to your proposal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the application. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. 1. APPLICANT NAME J'/M 2. APPLICANT ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER STREET Z 2 I s 7 fT t /! - Ave" CITY y,,., STATE Wi. ZIP (3139OZ PHONE (5 Z,g C/ Z75-- MESSAGE ( ) Na 3. APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY CHECK J`k OWNER ONE ❑ CONTRACT PURCHASER ❑ OWNER REPRESENTATIVE ❑ OTHER 4. PROPERTY OWNER (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) NAME 5. PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS AND PHONE (IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT) STREET 221 $owT14 / g 1:27 A - CITY (idi¢,ii iA STATE WA ZIP ei gqD 2. PHONE 4.1 ) Z (L$ q27s MESSAGE ( ) /VFt 6. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY: l8I312_— /143 /4f4197 /'/./5" 7. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPE(2TY: g / _Z 8. ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Z18 , )o2274 3Z_ •#=11 14( u� 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Class (2) Use ❑ Class (3) Use ❑ Rezone ❑ Variance ❑ Home Occupation Administrative Adjustment Environmental Checklist (SEPA) o Modification to Approved Class (2) & (3) Uses ❑ Appeal ❑_ Nonconforming Structure/Use Preliminary Subdivision ❑ Short Plat ORight-of-Way Vacation o Short Plat Exemption o Shoreline ❑ Utility Easement Release ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner Other -TP-41"6/90/1-7)97-7c''`) FIs 10. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS 11. I certify that thp'information n and 0 required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. --7 — Z -- D SIGNATURE DATE Revised 9-98 FOR ADM INISTRATIVE USE ONLY /34 5 f #/36I FILE NO. FEE PAID RECEIVED BY INDE ARING DAT vw (/ 4 e-#0-02 APPLICATION FOR: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISON CITY OF YAKIMA SUBDIVISON ORDINANCE 1. PROPERTY OWNER List all persons and financial institutions that have a financial or ownership interest in the property. (Attach if lengthy). Name and address SASS D . r 574)-a:601 4. F c -a- 221 S . / q t ,4v5 .�// g LAcagt, w*/ tiolow4 1,44 0)990 Name and address 1 J/UtstriJ' L PC.4 t/4-4^-64- 1j,4 6,R,a2, 2. SURVEYOR AND ADDRESS ,4?..Q E2D I Mfr SSocm S ) 31)5-iJ, es Ave. ie`ti4,b.,4 gS902_ 3. MAIN CONTACT (Person who should receive correspondence and be availalbe to answer questions) f -/P2 -047a — (S-44)) Z f?- /9/? �-/Jo A)oft,Ti.t 2-e-4 sr. Lf 4&'('?4 1.x/4 d9,› 1 4. GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY (Address if available) 2 -les Alsot f' 3 Z >4t-temirE 5. NAME OF SUBDIVISON --T}/ a -r pF 5uA4,.077)l ew int e17,47 s 6. PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS/RANGE OF LOT SIZES /'7 607-5 R,406 7 040 0 40 9 538 7. S11'h FEATURES A) General description of the site (Check all that apply) ❑ Flat gental slopes 0 steep slopes B) Are there any indications of hazards associated with unstable soils such as slides or slipping in the area? 0 YES VNO Describe: C) Is the Property in a 100 year floodplain or other critical area as defined by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)? 0 YES):4NO 8. UTILI`1'1hS AND SERVICES A) Indicate the source of domestic water awl sewage disposal method: WATER- B) Check which of the following is available: '( Electricity IX Telephone % Cable TV P' Natural Gas C) Is irrigation water available to the property? '=•1 YES 0 NO By whom: C_( OF (1,14)4A-/ D) Distance to nearest fire hydrant. oN 4-1`;443#33� AV E, — 5T- S'914114OF �LArT E) Name of nearest street. Not 2-1'✓2-1'� 33 f411aJ4 E�• F) Name of nearest school SOB fi � Sire 0,4446- r�� c ,t) 3 ILL. eL it G) Method of handling surface water drainage: 0i0-SirE 0,,446- -1'1P 10 G/77J OG 7W I hereby authorize the submittal of the preliminary plat application to the City of Yakima for review. I understand that condi- tions of approval such as dedication of right-of-way, easements, restrictions on the type of buildings that may be constructed, and access restrictions fom public r ds may be imposed as a part of preliminary plat approval and that failure to meet these conditionmay resu ,-intiial' the final plat. Property Owi (s) Date page 2 of 2 J V Vii LLlY.LL i.\ 11 >Y 1 S -t i i.11 �S i11��. ♦ 1 �/1� CLASS (2) REVIEW 0 CLASS (3) REVIEW CHAPTER 15.14 AND 15.15, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) cai PROPOSED LAND USE TYPE (Important: Must be taken From Table 4-1, of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance) 7Ulo - r'4M/(j Dwa,L // Gr ! - TZ -1 zoNrAlei Dispel cr LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (Attach if lengthy) 7 ,br ci.. i. SITE PLAN REOUIRED: (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) i. A WRITTEN NARRATIVE: (Please answer the following questions in the narrative) A. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? 7. AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (If required by the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)) Note: If you have any questions about this process please come in person to the Planning Division, 129 North 2nd St. Yakima, WA or call the Planning Division at (509) 575-6183, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY For Class (2) Applications, the proposed development requires Class (2) Review for the following reasons: ❑ Listed as a Class (2) use in Table 4-1; or, O Structural or other physical site improvements are proposed or required by this title, and the use has frontage on a designated collector or arterial road (single-family dwellings, duplexes, and their accessory structures are exempt from this provision); or ❑ All or part of the parcel proposed for development is in the Flood Plain, Airport, or Greenway Overlay Districts; or, O The proposed use includes hazardous materials; or, ❑ A mobile or manufactured home listed as a Class (2) use in Section 15.04.120. Revised 9-98 1 WRITTEN NARRATIVE (Class 2 Review) A. Fully describe the proposed development, including number of housing units and parking spaces. If the proposal is for a business describe hours of operation, days per week and all other pertinent information related to business operations. The proposal is to subdivide approximately 2.5 acres of Two- family Residentially zoned property into 12 residential lots, construct 5 duplexes on 5 existing lots currently zoned Single- family Residential through Class 2 Review and vacate and relocate an existing right-of-way. The total proposal consists of 17 lots and 17 duplexes (34 dwelling units). This specific Class 2 Review deals with the placement of the 5 duplexes on the 5 existing lots. A total of 4 parking spaces for each duplex will also be provided. The balance of the lots are proposed to be created through a long plat in the Two-family Residential Zoning District and are not part of this Class 2 Review because the property is zoned Two-family Residential, which permits duplexes. B. How is the proposal compatible to neighboring properties? What mitigation measures are proposed to promote compatibility? The proposal is compatible with the neighboring properties because it has been designed to have the least amount of impact on surrounding properties. As proposed, access to and from the plat will be directly to arterials, via local access streets. A right-of-way vacation is being requested so that traffic will not leave the site and enter into the established neighborhood to the north. This is being accomplished by providing a cul-de-sac on- site. The lot sizes have been designed to exceed minimum lot size requirements for a duplex in the R-1 Zone, thus minimizing the impact to the` surrounding neighborhood and providing additional open space. The developer proposes that the duplexes to be constructed west of North 33rd Street be only single -story. This will help mitigate impacts to the surrounding neighbors. Additionally, appropriate sightscreening will be established along adjoining properties as determined by the zoning ordinance and the Reviewing Official. C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? The proposal is consistent with the current zoning of the property. The use proposed (duplexes) is permitted upon Class 2 Review. All development standards are proposed to be met, except the rear yard setback. An administrative adjustment of 5 feet is being requested to keep the duplexes single -story. This adjustment will keep the height of the buildings down and keep the development compatible with the adjoining residences. By following the development standards in the zoning ordinance, the proposal will be consistent with the uses and zoning of neighboring properties. This is particularly true because of the mixture of zoning within this proposal. Property lying directly east of this Class 2 request is zoned R-2. This proposal is consistent with that aspect of the project. Additionally, part of the development will be duplexes on large lots and part of the development will be duplexes on smaller lots. The larger lot duplex area will buffer the smaller lot duplex area from adjoining properties where the R-1 Zoning abuts other R-1 Zoning. D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? This proposal is in the best interest of the community because it can be served with all necessary infrastructure and meet the housing needs of the community. This proposal is an infill project which will create new housing opportunities in the central Yakima Area. The proposal meets the purpose and intent of the R-1 Zoning District and the goals, objectives and policies of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. ST TnPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR: ADMINISTRATIV E ADJUSTMENT CHAPTER 15.10, YAKIMA URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE (UAZO) 1. TYPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT REOUESTED (✓ at least one): Rear tS' SETBACKS: Front, ❑ FENCES ❑ PARKING ❑ SITESCREENING ❑ SIGNS: Height___ ❑ LOT COVERAGE ❑ OTHER 2. AM • 'a • F • DJU ENI'. 2® Zoning ordinance requirement Side Size /S' 5' -F Proposed standard Adjustment requested 3. PROPOSED USE: (Important: Must be taken From Table 4-1, of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance 0—�,4Nt1 Sr/ _ 17,41- : w 1 /1-1 Z 1' D;J r. 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: (Attach if lengthy) ttG0 5. SITE PLAN REQUIRED: (Please use the City of Yakima Site Plan Checklist) 6. A WRITTEN NARRATIVE: (Please submit a written response to the following items: A. How would the strict enforcement of the current standard affect your project? Why is the adjustment requested? B. How is the proposal compatible with neighboring properties? Have other adjustments been granted nearby? C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and, Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? 7. AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: (If required by the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Zn )) 129 North Note: If you have any questions about this process please 5090me 57516n p83, Monday erson to the Planning F day 8na.m. to 5 p.m. St. Yakima, WA or call the Planning Division(509) Revised 9-98 WRITTEN NARRATIVE (Administrative Adjustment) A. How would strict enforcement of the current standard affect your project? Why is the adjustment requested? Strict enforcement of the current rear yard setback will affect this project in one major way. It will require the developer to construct two-story (townhouse -type) units instead of single - story units. The applicant has talked to some of the neighbors which live westerly of this proposal and it is their desire to have single -story units for privacy reasons. The adjustment is being requested because the developer believes that single -story units are more compatible with the adjoining properties than two- story units. This adjustment is requested for the rear yard setback of Lots 13 through 17 of the proposed plat. B. How is the proposal compatible with neighboring properties? Have other adjustments been granted nearby? The proposal is compatible with surrounding properties because most of the current residences in the area are single -story. Permitting the adjustment will keep the neighborhood as a whole single -story and compatible with one another. The applicant does not know of any other adjustments which have been granted nearby. C. Is your proposal consistent with current zoning of your property; and Is your proposal consistent with uses and zoning of neighboring properties? The proposal is consistent with current zoning because the zoning ordinance permits administrative adjustments when one or more of the following objectives can be accomplished: a. Allow buildings to be sited in a manner which maximizes solar access; b. Allow zero lot line or common wall construction in conformance with the provisions of this title; c. Coordinate development with adjacent land uses and the physical features of this title; d Permit flexibility in the design and placement of structures and other site improvements; e. Allow development consistent with a specific sub -area plan adopted by either the city or county. In this instance, the adjustment complies with a, c and d above. The proposal will be single -story which will maximize solar access to existing residences which lie westerly of this project. A two-story unit would create shade and block solar access which currently does not exist. Most of the surrounding residences are single -story. The applicant desires to construct single -story units which indicates good coordination of development with adjacent land uses. Additionally, the adjustment permits flexibility in the design and placement of structures to compliment the entire neighborhood. A fifteen foot year yard setback also .represents the minimum rear yard setback permitted in the R-2 Zoning District, which abuts this proposal on the east. D. Is your proposal in the best interest of the community? This proposal is in the best interest of the community because it compliments the surrounding neighborhood and is compatible with existing adjoining properties. The proposal provides new housing opportunities in Central Yakima and is an infill project which will use existing infrastructure. 10'x10' PATIO LOT 14 8,055 S.F. 95.1' S 74° 57' 41" E UNIT #1 (o V U J ao GARAGE 12'x24' 10'x10' PATIO 15' GARAGE 12'x24' DRIVEWAY 24'x21' UNIT #2 39' 21' 80.0' S 74° 57' 41" E TYPICAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS SCALE: 1" = 16"-0" BUILDING Sc IMPROVEMENTS FOOTPRINT LOT SIZE 3,398 S.F. 8,055 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 42% CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR VACATION OF PUBLIC STREETS OR ALLEYS CITY OF YAKIMA, 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, YAKIMA , WA 98901 509/ 575-6113 INSTRUCTIONS 1. This application form must accompany a petition for the processing of right of way vacations. 2. Please print or type your answers. 3. This form is primarily for the purpose of establishing the principle applicant for any proposal to vacate a street or right of way. Often, there may be many parties involved in a right of way vacation. It is important to establish which party is responsible for supplying the technical or detailed information required in this procedure. FEE A non-refundable fee is required for the processing of this application, payable to the "CITY OF YAKIMA" at the time of filing of the application and petition. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of applicant J)M F I ( L Address of applicant 121 N oR,Tt4 3 L ,4uE` l iq ejwt4 tdA 8 Ajoi. Applicant's Telephone Z - 9275" REQUIRED INFORMATION Persons or parties wishing to vacate a public street, alley or right of way (for access) must first submit a petition which provides a legal description of the area. The petition must be signed by property owners of two-thirds of the abutting property. In addition, a narrative should be submitted which includes the following information: 1. A statement which includes the calculation of the requirement for obtaining two-thirds of the property signatures of abutting lands (which may include a parcel map). 2. The applicant must submit a written narrative declaring how the proposed right of way vacation meets the criteria for approving petitions for right of way vacations as summarized below. a. The petition to vacate the right of way must explain the public benefits of DOC* r•-( -oz- PE`T'ITION NO. CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON PETITION TO VACATE STREET OR ALLEY To the City Council of the City of Yakima, Washington. Comes now the undersigned petitioners and, pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.79, now respectfully show: The undersigned petitioners request that the following described street, alley or portion thereof, located in the City of Yakima, be vacated pursuant to RCW 35.79. (provide legal description below, or attach to petition, if lengthy). ec- axm6lr Each of the undersigned petitioners is the owner of an interest in real estate abutting on the above-described area. The undersigned petitioners constitute owners of more than two-thirds of said abutting property. Wherefore, petitioners pray that proceedings be had hereon for the vacation of said area in the manner prescribed by RCW Chapter 35.79. Respectfully submitted, Name tit E IO i u6 Address of Property Date LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR CLASS 2 REVIEW PARCEL No. 181322-14493 LOT 1 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 1 81 322-1 4494 LOT 2 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 1 81 322-1 4495 LOT 3 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 1 81 322-1 4496 LOT 4 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 1 81 322-1 4497 LOT 5 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT PARCEL No. 1 81 322-1 4493 LOT 1 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 181322-14494 LOT 2 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 181322-14495 LOT 3 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 181322-14496 LOT 4 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 181322-14497 LOT 5 OF THE REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICAL PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 0 OF PLATS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON REQUIRED INFORMATION 1. A statement which includes the calculation of the requirement for obtaining two-thirds of the property signatures of abutting lands (which may include a parcel map) . All property owner's that abut the proposed right-of-way vacation have signed the petition (see parcel map -- Exhibit 3). 2. The applicant must submit a written narrative declaring how the proposed right-of-way vacation meets the criteria for approving petitions for right-of-way vacations as summarized below. a. The petition to vacate the right-of-way must explain the public benefits of the project, the reasons for the proposed vacation and the limits of the vacation. The public will benefit from this vacation because it permits the applicant to vacate and relocate the right-of-way in a different configuration which permits access directly to arterials (North 32nd Avenue and Summitview Avenue) from the proposed development. This provides a direct outlet for the existing and proposed residences along North 33rd Avenue and gets vehicles onto the arterial system in a safe and efficient manner. The vacation will enhance traffic circulation by creating an additional outlet to North 32nd Avenue which did not previously exist. This ensures that incompatible traffic from the duplex project does not mix with the traffic from the surrounding residential neighborhood. The limits of the vacation are from Jefferson Avenue, to the south line of the plat. b. The vacation of any right-of-way cannot deny sole access to any property. No property will be denied any access as a result of this vacation. c. Petitions should be consistent with the Six-year Transportation Improvement Plan, the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and other official City Plans and policies. The existing right-of-way is unimproved and is not anticipated to be developed through the Six-year Transportation Improvement Plan. The proposal is consistent with the Urban Area Comprehensive Plan because and other City Plans because it helps develop a transportation system that provides a wide range of efficient, safe, and economical alternatives for movement of people and goods within, to and from the Yakima Urban Area. It also coordinates land use assumptions, growth projections and other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. d. Vacation of rights -of -ways should be appropriate with existing and anticipated development in the area, based upon zoning, current use and long range plans, This proposal incorporates one of the last undeveloped properties in the area into a subdivision. Based on this, the vacation and relocation take into account the existing and anticipated development and propose to serve the neighborhood better as a whole, rather than the individual development itself. The new roadway is proposed to be a local access street and will be capable of serving all existing and proposed lots in the area. Once completed, this roadway will become part of the city system. e. Existing Public and Franchised utilities located in the right-of-ways to be vacated should be relocated at the expense of the developer or an adequate easement provided. If it is determined that such existing utilities do not need to be relocated, this requirement may be waived. There are no existing utilities in the right-of-way which is proposed to be vacated. ATTACHMENTS The following items should be submitted to complete the application for the vacation of public streets or alleys. Some items may be waived by the Department of Community and Economic Development, if just cause for such waiver is submitted by the applicant. 1. A title search or report, is required to be submitted describing the legal status and ownership of the right-of- way (this requirement may be waived). This attachment has been waived by planning because a title report has been supplied as part of the preliminary plat and will be reaffirmed with a "date down endorsement" when the final vacation is approved. 2. A survey of the area to be vacated (this requirement may be waived) . The preliminary plat shows the area of right-of-way to be vacated, and is attached as Exhibit 1. 3. The petition must contain an accurate legal description of the area to be vacated and should be accompanied by a map which identifies the area. A survey plat may be substituted for another map. See attached legal description attached as Exhibit 2. 4. A fair market appraisal if the adjoining assessed values indicate expected value of greater than $4,000. The complete policy of the Yakima City Council regarding required compensation from Right of Way Vacations is found in Resolution D-5630, adopted by the Yakima City Council on September 12 1989. Not required per planning, as a roadway was never constructed within the right-of-way. 5. Engineering plans as appropriate to indicate how the curb, gutter and other physical features will be treated after the vacation is enacted. A new roadway will be constructed in the relocated right-of-way and will be constructed to Title 12 Standards as part of final plat approval. 6. A traffic analysis prepared by a Certified Engineer is required by the City of Yakima Department of Public Works which describes the impact to the City transportation network of the closure of the right of way. (This requirement may be waived.) The City Traffic Engineer will provide guidance in determining the scope of the review required for each individual case. Not required per the Traffic Engineer, as the impact is insignificant and another access alternative is proposed by the relocation of the right-of-way. r^1i ,it 4 BUeJO THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS 'i VL NC 1/4 Cr ,.I(.'KIM 22. TOV[gNP 13 I/OQII/. VOCEM UM YANNA C'OBNIY, Y/y11ICTOM MIEN= AIME VOL Ir.,10 10 9 FLAGG 7 1 OMNI PA re 1 5 ADDMON R — 1 4 3 2 1 1 LCD* OES IFTC•4 - MDR' ammS 10041144 VILIICI-14403 FST.' �tle111,1Lw=11 FOWL ..,ill312-1.». MOM Na. ..=_„e. v%1"TairiTielratsrana ROCS. e, I.a!-,MN /WOOL s ,am -,as IC[r ' aor--MLIII UMW WNW MOW "ORM MOWED In ,NNW mrc set v wreot COMM r:e. tic RESIDENTIN Row*r SEC MD SOME CENTER LW CURVE ORA BASS OF BEARRICS: EAST UIE of THE NE 114 OF SECDON 22. TOM61P 13 RAUCE 13 (311 BEM N 0025 0O' W As WAN ON THE SURVEY RECORDED WIDER *221ORS RE NA. 7045903 sale 1-437 NONr>f EX/g18 /T g‘ IN Ch >�Amt. 1071w1.4 - cwnucmvw.cn.wir 4* w. MN. O 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED The fifty foot (50') wide right of way of North 33rd Avenue shown on the face of Replat of Shuman Addition, recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 37, records of Yakima County Washington and, The fifty foot (50') wide right of way of North 33rd Avenue in the East fifty feet (50') of Lot 6 of Flagg Addition, recorded in Volume "I" of Plats, page 30, records of Yakima County Washington. 30 2433 5 12417 cn F/1 In .4.01 "'Iv) 3 23 CO ';Z;15,,,g-ct•rg-,P; .3't • -46",,Riftg,144.4).T1$0'.'i0 14 14414 13001 osits 13 144 3 12 14412 11 14411 13068 13058 0.21 S3066 13054 13050 22 msm. ,r4 Scale 1" = 200 feet .n.reov, Thla map la ;natural only as an old In thi and IassavontattOfmai priillarty Mita Yakima County AsAirworit Zi Office ricairitilt warrant 0.15 0.43 it. 4660.1141161f, FL K.J PC -:0--503 eo-G, at,Ti p Ds 7E; (41-e 12,0Pacci E)liftepi JIM FICKEL PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS Hearing Examiner Exhibit List CHAPTER G NOTICES EXHIBIT # DOCUMENT DATE G-1 Notice of Application and Environmental Review & Request for Comments 7-23-02 G-2 Adjoining property owners notified 7-23-02 G-3 Affidavit of Mailing 7-23-02 G-4 Additional Parties of Record notified 7-23-02 G-5 Notice of Public Hearing 8-19-02 G-6 Affidavit of Mailing 8-19-02 G-7 Hearing Agenda 9-12-02 G-8 Posting of Property Certification 8-22-02 G-9 Legal Advertisement 8-16-02 G-10 Hearing Sign -in sheet 10-11-02 G-11 Notification of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation to the City Council 10-11-02 G-12 Affidavit of Mailing 10-11-02 G-13 Parties of Record notified 10-11-02 G-14 Agenda statement setting date for City Council public hearing 10-15-02 BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. c:)'g For Meeting Of: October 15, 2002 ITEM TITLE: Closed Record Public Hearing Set Date for the preliminary plat of Summitview Vineyards; Jim Fickel, Developer SUBMITTED BY: William R. Cook, Director of Community & Economic Development CONTACT PERSON / TELEPHONE: Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, 575-6042 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Set date of Closed Record Public Hearing for Council consideration of the preliminary plat of Summitview Vineyards, a 17 -Lot subdivision, for November 5, 2002. Resolution _ Ordinance_ Contract Other (Specify) Funding Source APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: •� City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date of Closed Record Public Hearing for November 5, 2002 BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Hearings Examiner recommended approval subject to conditions on October 3, 2002. COUNCIL ACTION: November 5, 2002 was set as the date of closed recorFjJ iicearing. Hearing Examiner EXH • G- /`' Date File 1. ' (40- Don & Priscilla Painientier 3301 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Debbie Lewis 227 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Chuck Foster 3207 W. Nob Hill Blvd Yakima, WA. 98902-4960 Bob & Rhinda Clem 221 No. 32nd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 William B. Petri 3211 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Bill Lynch 5511 Glacier Way Yakima, WA 98908 Dale Johnson 3310 Jefferson Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Luther, Patricia, Anna & Patty Carey NO ADDRESS GIVEN, NOT IN PHONE BOOK Cindy Noble NFRD 5609 W. Arlington Yakima, WA 98908 Parties of Record Fickel Long Plat#2-02 Jim Fickel 221 So. 19th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Dennis McCullough 224 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902-2273 Vern R. Peterson 213 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Steve Sutliff 219 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Robert & Virginia Braden 225 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Earl & Donnajean Barton 223 No. 34th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Michael J. & Karen Roberts 212 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Ray & Blanche Hoff 209 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Bill Hordan 410 No. 2nd Street Yakima, WA. 98901 Alison A. Roy 215 No. 33rd Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Dennis Martin 3204 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 John Andriotti 305 No. 6th Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Alfred & Inez Mabry 211 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Paulino & Elvia Gonzalez 3402 Summitview Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Thomas & Helen Lamberton 214 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Ella Cruze 216 No. 33rd Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Filed Hearing Examiner EXH t a Date AW -or )___ Foe // -a) - File E /�w 114ce- , STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: C _s X2-0 eJ V C#3-()-- rte( )-- e( 44., :/d"d2' (ii e rh t'stif d7Z' 13 Also ..3e.2 k ',4 -rte • 1, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of the Hearing Examiners recommendation to the Yakima City Council. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all parties of record which are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the it day of (2c4b,er" ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson Filed Hearing Examiner EXH #,6-/-2 Date 0-//-62-- File d-//-GZ File # Q/A/ DEPARTMENT uF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVkLOP_MENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 ® Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO THE YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL On October 3, 2002 the Yakima Hearing Examiner rendered his recommendation on the Preliminary Long Plat Master Application submitted by Mr. Jim Fickel. The proposed 17 -lot Plat of Summitview Vineyards is located in the vicinity of 218 North 32nd Avenue, Yakima, Washington. The application was reviewed at a public hearing held by the Hearing Examiner on September 12, 2002. A copy of the Hearing Examiner's Findings and Recommendation is enclosed. The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation will be considered by the Yakima City Council in a Public Hearing to be scheduled. The City Clerk will notify you of the date, time and place of the public hearing. For further information or assistance you may contact Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, City of Yakima Planning Division located on the 2nd floor of Yakima City Hall, (129 North Second Street), 575-6042. Doug Maples Planning and Code Administration Manager Date of mailing: October 11, 2002 Enclosures Yakima CASE # HEARING SIGN -IN SHEET CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS HEARING DATE: September 12, 2002 APPLICANT: UAZO R/W VAC#3-02, LONG PLAT#2-02 JIM FICKEL UAZO CL(2)#22-02, ADM ADJ#10-02, EC#13-02 NAME: SITE ADDRESS: PLAT OF SUMMITVII-W VINEYARD5 Vicinity of N. 33rd & Jefferson Aves. PLEASE PRINT ADDRESS: 3 -3 e') /72 / t.,10 ZIP: ?r9 L/6- ---d-c4,94,, ) C)( 7)/ LOC -4 6-rt.r! iv 2 /---2 ct C? eiS*"14 3 q - t93JLr '3;01 -5-cbAiii4[1t7ugic) ;;Z cfl 311- (ice 6)2_ aft. etZ 3-?, -7--) A/ :33 ci ti 414 P14 1 ea," c/- c_701z/zt/5-ciAy s /41/ mi. 7 i&tJ Filed Hearing Examiner EXH#11:21_Date File # VA 0 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the undersigned that a public hearing will be held by the Yakima City Hearing Examiner Pro Tem to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Mr. Jim Fickel. The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 4.5 acres of property into 17 lots in the vicinity of 218 North 32nd Avenue, Yakima, Washington. Mr. Fickel also requests 'Class (2) land use review for the construction of 5 duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of the subdivision, a five-foot adjustment of the rear yard setback standards of the R-1 zoning district, and the vacation of the unbuilt portion of North 33`d Avenue. The public hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, September 12, 2002, beginning at 9:00 am., or soon thereafter, in the Council Chambers at Yakima City Hall, 129 North Second Street, Yakima, Washington. City File Number: UAZO PREL LONG PLAT#2-02 UAZO CL(2)#22-02, UAZO R/W VAC#3-02 UAZO ADM ADJ#10-02 & UAZO EC#13-02 Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 181322-14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497 & 14515 Further information regarding this hearing may be obtained by contacting Bruce Benson, Senior Planner, City of Yakima Planning Division, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901, or by calling 575-6042. Doug Maples Planning & Code Administration Manager Please publish once only on Friday, August 16, 2002 Please mail affidavit of publication to: Account #11002 City of Yakima Planning Division 129 N 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 DEPARTMEN''')F COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC D TLOPMENT Planning Divis._ 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 POSTING OF PROPERTY CERTIFICATION I understand that the Section 16.05.010 of the Yakima Municipal Code and the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance require me to post the property at least 20 days prior to the public hearing. I certify that on the Notice of Public Hearing on sign(s) provided by the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development was posted on the property located at so as to be clearly seen from each right-of-way providing primary vehicular access to the property. Signature Date (Please return to the City of Yakima Department of Community and Economic Development before your public hearing to confiini the posting requirements of the ordinance above have been met.) Yakima INDEX 1111 # 1994 CITY OF YAKIMA HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTION III. PUBLIC HEARING A. JIM FICKEL Planner Assigned: File Number: Location: Request: IV. ADJOURNMENT Yakima City Hall Council Chambers Bruce Benson UAZO PREL LONG PLAT#2-02, UAZO CL(2)#22-02 UAZO ADM ADJ#10-02, R/W VAC#3-02 & EC#13-02 Vicinity of 218 No. 32nd Avenue Preliminary 17 lot subdivision, duplexes in the R-1 zone, setback adjustment and street vacation If you are unable to attend the hearing, you may submit your comments in writing prior to the hearing. You may also submit written testimony at the hearing. DOC INDEX L STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: MAzd Lith let 4 ,2 -42) C4.11/-.2.,/- 0D- d'a # 3 -c /C -se.,( C -dz, EC crsde, I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Public Hearing by the City Hearing Examiner, a true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the 0 day oftataks-i--- ,2002. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson DOC. INDEX '13" 7os. DEPARTMENT Or COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 4, Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTICE OF HEARING DATE: August 19, 2002 TO: Applicant and Adjoining Property Owners FROM: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes and Planning Divisions SUBJECT: Notice of Master Land Use Application concerning property located at 218 N 32"d Avenue UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, RNV VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development has received has received from Jim Fickel a preliminary plat application to subdivide approximately 4.5 acres of property into 17 Lots (this property is predominately zoned R-2, Two Family Residential with the remainder being R-1, Single -Family Residential.) He also requests Class (2) land use review for the construction of five duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of the subdivision, a five-foot adjustment of the rear yard setback standards of the R-1 zoning district and the vacation of the unbuilt portion N 33rd Avenue. . Preliminary plats require that the hearing examiner hold an open record public hearing prior to his submitting a recommendation to the City Council. This public hearing has been scheduled for Thursday, September 12, 2002, beginning at 9:00 am, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. If you have any questions on this proposal, please call Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509) 575-6042. Other Permits Required: None at this time Yakima '111► 1 1994 Jim Fickel Prel Long PLat#2-02 UAZO R/Gfi VAC#3-02 Additional Parties of Record, Applicant & Contact Person Last First Street City State Zip Fickel Jim 221 So. 19th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Hordan Bill 410 No. 2nd Street Yakima, WA. 98901 Lewis Debbie 227 No. 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 McCullough Denms 224 No 34th Ave Yakima, WA. 98902-2273 Resident 215 No. 33`d Ave Yakima, WA. 98902 Foster Chuck 3207 W. Nob Hill Blvd Yakima, WA. 98902-4960 Doc INDEX - STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Re: Pref Lout it , O"Cm ¶tLie-e( 64> d r AJO • 3a-121 f4ty. . I, Christine Wilson as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application and Request for Comments. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to all property owners of record within a radius of 500 feet of subject property, that said property owners are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on the c22 day of ,a7... C ,2002. That 1 mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Christine M. Wilson .10. khoic.40-02 9E0133 08:49:03 07-11-02 Parcel # Owner Name PARCEL BASIC INFORMATION LIST' For List: r-w-vac3-02 Owner Address Page- '1 181322-14022 181322-14023 181322-14026 181322-14027 181322-14030 181322-14031 181322-14034 181322-14035 181322-14038 181322-14039 181322-14847 181322-14050 181322-14051 181322-14052 181322-14053 181322-14054 181322-14055 181322-14056 181322-1440'0 181322-14401 181322-14402 181322-14403 181322-14404 181322-14406 181322-14407 181322-14408 181322-14409 181322.-14410. 181322-14411' 181322-14412 181322-14413 181322-14414 181322-14415 181322-14416 ,181322-14417 181322-14418. 181322-14419, 181322-14420 181322-14421 181322-14422 181322-14423 181322-14424 181322-14425 181322--14426, 181322-14427 ;181322-14428 181322-14429 181322-14430 BETTY J. WIGHT DONNA J LOPAZE CARLEN J MAJNARICH BRIAN J BUSBY JAMES D. CARMICHAEL GLENN E & ROBYN R KLINGELE MARGARET MITCHELL JAMES A. VANDERVATE LOUIS T & JACKIE E JOHNSON VICTORIA A. SCHLUNEGER SCOTT A & D HOLBROOK BRUNS DANIEL R & MARIE C IVY CHARLES A.ETUX SCHMALING DAVID L & CAROL A WOOD WILLIAM B & GLENDA P PETRIE RAY R. HOFF ALFRED G. MABRY ALISON A NOLZ PHIL & PENN SHELTON ROBERT J.'HENDERSON VIRGIL CLARK, TRUSTEE SANDRA J NESTWOOD PEDRO L & TRACY L CASE AROSTEGUI MATHEW D & JOY PETERSON NASARIO P CUEVAS SUSAN HEINTZ DALE E. JOHNSON. DALE E. JOHNSON WILFRED ETUX' SGAMBELLURI' STEVEN.7 & KACEY, J ROYCE LUIS G & ANGELICA M MENDOZA KENNETH D, STEPHANIE WEYRICK DONALD W SUBLETT RICHARD & JODY DAVEY DONALD W SSZBLETT ROBERT & ANGIK.GIRARD ANGEL,H &',. CARIA,V MALERO,,; ROBERT K.& LA. DONNA SCHOENGARTH ABRAHAM JR & JUDITH LOPEZ MARISOL BERMUDEZ MAX M & TAMMY IRWIN KEVIN NEUBERGER CHERYL.L CLARK RODNEYA,. EELLS MATTHEW & CYNTHIA'-TIBBETT 'JOHN J. &,MARJORIE, KEMPER.' CHARLES & SHELLEY GOERTLER JOHN P & KAY L RIGGS YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 989Q2 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington'98902 SELAH, Washington 98942-9505 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2222 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-2564 YAKIMA, Washington' 98902-2256- YAKIMA, Washington 98802, BLAINE, Washington. 98230 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2217 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2217 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAK3NA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2216 YA_KIMA, Washington 98901 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2241 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington -98902-2243 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2243 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902=2274 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 RAINIER, Oregon 97048 YAKIMA, Washington 98908. YAKIMA, Washington'98902.-2240 YAKIMA, Washington. 989022202_ YAKIMA, Washington 98902,-2240, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 989.0879767 YAKIMA,- Washingtoi 98982 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 CY9,KIMA„'Washington 98902,-2242, YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 PE01'33' • - 0849:03 07-11-02, .Parce141= Owner "Name. PARCEL BASIC' INFORMAT.ION'LIST For List-E;,r;w-vac3-02. ' - Owner Address 181322-14431 181322-14433 181322=14434' 181322-14435,,, 181322-'14436 -181322-14437' 181322-14438 181322-14439 181322-14440 181322-14441 181322-14442 181322-14443 '181322-14444 '181322-14445 181322-14446 181322-14447 181322-14448 181322-14449 181322-14450 181322-14451 181322-14452 151322-14454 181322-14455 181322-14456 181322-14462 181322-14463 181322-14464 181322,-14465 181322-14466 181322-14467 181322-14470 181322-14471 181322-14473 181322-14474 "i61322-'.14475--, 181222,14476- 161322,-14477 .•1322-14476181322-1'4477 ;181322-14478- 181322-14479 181322-14480 181322-14481 181322-14482 $'81322'=14465 ' 181322.1446,4 7 151322-144135.-c' 181322.=14485 181322-14487 181322-14488 JAMES E & MARY E CATON DAVID A" &- I'INDA, M NELSON FRED'.& ALICE BAKER.' FRED -& ALICE . BAKER''' DELORES`J. REYNOLDS, DELORES J. REYNOLDS MICHAEL L & LAURIE V STUCKEL MICHAEL P & MURIEL E WATTS DONALD W. MONROE MIKE E. -ET UX.ANTONIO"',.,.p -SHELLY J THOMAS,' - DEREK W.&KAY D SMITH• ANDREW 5, HUDSON,=—! GREGG D & MARY K PLEGER WILLIAM M & SHIRLEY O'HARE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOC TRACY MACHART DENNIS & SUSAN 'L GOUGH SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PATRICK J & CHERI..R,KEEPE'' TERRY A WEEDIN: " CHARLES 0 JR MARTIN JUDY K HENDERSON ELLA CRUCE THOMAS G & HELEN R LAMBERTON MICHAEL 2-..,ET'UX ROBERTS CHUNG" HON &< L'AI: 'GONG' CHAN WAYNE A, &', ELISE-.M:-STEINBACHER� DONALD'"ETUX FARMENTIER TORRES, JANICE & BENTZ, NANCY LEMKE, CHE KARI L HEILMAN JASON D & SARA M DECKER EDWARDO CCHUA ROBERT R'_&• DARLENE R"'FFiIRBROOK .,cc VHRN R.—PETERSON ., MARY..E, &, ALICE; L & THOMAS, T- OBRIEN MICHAEL, J't` & .LAURA•KL1-PPERT ' GEORGE D & SANDRA G HELTON DONALD M. GAROUTTE HELEN M. HILLBERY DELBERT- DALE MILLER MARGI1 ESTRElhl - "RICHARD' T"'ET AIL';BERGHOFF- ELIZABETH," BLOOMFIEID,';, "' 2 WAYNE7.G; &,'LESLI1T'5I .& 'JOYCE= M"'TURNER. i SCOTT A & D HOLBROOK BRUNS PATRICIA B SUTPHEN YAKIMA, Washington 98902 ,YAYGIMA, Washington 98902-2201' YAKIMA,"Washington 98902- YAKIMA, Washington 9890,2" YAKIMA, -,Washington,"98902: YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA, Washington. YAKIMA, Washington YAKIMA; Washington ;98901- ,_ - YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-8814 COLUMBUS, Ohio 43219 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2206 SELA14, W&shingtdn 989429206 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMIA, Washington 98502-2244 'YAKIMA, Washington. 98902-2268 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2218 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2218 YAKIMA,., Washington 98902 '- - YAKIMA, .Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington. +98902-2254' YAKIMA, Washington 98908-5526 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA; Wasllirigtoxi 98902=3.728 YAKIMA:, Washington $8902-222_9 YAKIMA;"Wasfiingtori 98902' ,YAKIMA:„ Washington 98902-2219- YAKIMA, 8902-2219- YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2219 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 YARIMA,, Washington,.98902-2273 YAKIMA; Washiiigt5n'98902-:2273' YAKIMA;,:Washington' 98902Z: ' 'COLORADO SPRINGS.Colorad660911-31383, YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2256 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-8914 98902 98902 98902-2203 98902-2203 98902 98902' 98902, -- '9E0133 08:49 03 07-11-02 Parcel # 181322-14489 181322-14490 181322-14491 181322-14492 181322-14493 181322-14494 181322-14495 181322-14496 181322-14497 181322-14498 181322-14499 181322-14500 181322-14501 181322-14502 181322-14503 181322-14504 181322-14505 181322-14506 181322-14507 181322-14508 181322-14509 181322-14510. 181322-14511 181322-14512 181322-14513 181322-41001 181322-41002, 181322,-410Q3 '181322-41008' 181322-41009 181322-41014 181322-41015 181322-41016 181322-41020 1.81322-41449 :'181323-23028 '181323-23029" 187323-230.30 181323-23418 181323-23419 181323-23420 181323-23421 ;'181.323 -234'24- 0181323=2,3425, "18 132 3--2 3"4'26 ,"181323-23427 181323-23426 181323-23429 PARCEL BASIC' INFORMA'T'ION LIST, For List: r-w-vac3.02 " ' Owner Name Owner Address" KELLY & BLAIR LEANN QUNELL RALPH SHIVELY MATTHEW J & ERIN T'ANDERTbN MICHAEL A SCULLY HOWARD H & M SHUMAN' HOWARD & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN HOWARD H & M SHUMAN STEPHAN D. ET UX SUTLIFF STEPHAN D. ET UX SUTLIFF EARL & DONNA JEAN CARROLL BARTON ROBERT W. BRADEN MASON H SOLOSABAL GREGORY B & SUZANNE FLUEGGE DONALD E. FARRELL DIANA T FRONTIS DENNIS J & AN SUK MC CULLOUGH JAMES E & AMANDA EGLIN JOANN MILLS G. BRUCE HOTCHKIS GREGG FRAZIER ROBERT D & SHIRLEY M WILKINSON YAKIMA COUNTY COMMISIONERS STEVE & DEBRA HAHN ROY JAMES ROBECK DENNIS & DEBBIE MARTIN', ALAN R: & RAETTA."P DAWS__ " BLAINE M-.1 SHAWN,."K CAMPBELL,., RICHARD- 7..;•& 'LISA "K' BOHL , CARL D & CARRIE LOU BEHLER JAMES ET UX DECCIO FRED H. ANDREWS PAULINO & ELVIA GONZALEZ ALBERT -J. MEAGHER THOMAS.5.-PLEASANTS LARRY E &;HEAT.HER'M"MILLER, SCOTT',.R &'CHAN"I"L"WASHBTIRN THE SHOPKEEPER LTD JULIE M AMIS ROBERT JR & TONITA BERGER SPENCER FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST BENITO E./CATHERINE M RAMI.REZ RUSSELL D & DONNA L" SCOFIELD-, ,MARY LEE' RUTLEDGE _ 'DEAN,M JR WOOD - - ROBERT L & RHINDA CLEM JEANA JOHNSON YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington '98902„` YAKIMA, Washington 98902',-;- CAMANO' ISLAND, 8902",.,',CAMANO"ISLAND,, Washington 98292-.8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292_88.2'1 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 CAMANO ISLAND, Washington 98292-8821 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2219 YAkIMA; Washington" 98902•-2219 YAKIMA,, Washington 98902-2219 YAKIMA, Washington. 98902-2259. , YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2273 SELAH, Washington 98942 YAKIMA, Washington 98002 YAKIMA/ Washington 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington, 98902-2221 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98901 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, ,Washington 98902,--2253 YAKIMA; Washington 98902-2253 ,YAKIMA; Washington- 98902• YAKIMA>' Washington '8902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2255 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2255 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2287 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA; Washington ,98502-_2257 ,YAKIMA; _Washiij,gton 989.02 , ,YAKIMA,, Washington- 9'8902, YAKIMA; 'Washington 98'9.02 YAKIMA, Washington 96902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA„” Washington -,i9'8902,,' _YAKIMA'," Waiis,hl-en; 9:8,902 YAKIMA,., Washington X98902;=2334 'YAKIMA, Washington -98'902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 3 9E0133 08:49:03 07-11-02 Parcel # Owner Name PARCEL BASIC INFORMATION LIST"' For List: r-w-vac3-02 •Owner Address Page 4 181323-23430 181323-23431 181323-23432 181323-23433 181323-23434 181323,-23435 181323-23436 181323-23439 181323-23440 181323-23441 181323-23442 181323-23443 181323-23444 181323-23445 181323-23446 181323-23447 181323-23448 181323-23498 181323-23499 181323-23590 181323-23501 181323-23502 181323-23503 181323-23504 181323-23505 181323-23506 181323-23507 181323-23508., 181323-23509 181323-23510 181323-23511 181323-23512 181323-23514 181323-23517 181323-23518 181323-32497 181323-32498 , 181323-32499-' MAXINE R. MC AULEY KERRY A & GINA M MARTIN BEVERLY C WILSON' SALLY S MAYO" JENNIFER E SMITH TODD E BERTHON, LINDA S JAMESON DONALD E. ET UX REAM DENNIS RAY ALTHEA FAIN DEPT OF HUD TERRY W. NOWLIN JACK CURTSINGER JOHN H. HILL NYE FAMILY REVOCABLE MATTHEW E STEPHENS CHUCK & MARDI FOSTER SHEILA MARIE BURNS SANDRA J PACE ALVIN R ET UX TIBBETT KAREN A DAVIS KENNETH L & FRANCES ROSE JAMES M & SHIRLEY A PECHTEL CHRISTINE T ROBERTS SALLY GAMBLE BURT G SHELBY MIKE K & KATHY L KOVATCH JERRY L. & NITA M. PUTAS ROBERT 'E & CARLA-J HARCUM, RICHARD N '& MARIONE,CARLSON MARK J & MARTHA BURNS LARRY L. ET UX TURNER TERRY MC KENNA RUSSELL J & ANGELA L MOQUIN ELEANOR,G HARDING WALDON R. STANLEY VICKIE, KNIGHT REED - BLAKE & EED-BLAKE,& SUSETTE ESPINOZA TRUST Total Number of Parcels: 182 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-1677 YAKIMA; Washington'98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 989022213 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2308 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 IRVINE, California 92612, ' YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2333 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2333 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 YAKIMA, Washington 98908-1239 YAKIMA, Washington 98908 ' '• YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2335 SELAH, Washington 98942 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-2336 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, -Washington. 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902-3424 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 YAKIMA;,,Washington 98902-2723 YAKIMA,.' Washington -98902 YAKIMA, Washington 98902 DEPARTMENT OI _2)MMi MINI TY AND EC'ONOMIC REVEL 'MENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 Fax (509) 575-6105 NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATE: July 23, 2002 TO: Applicant, Adjoining Property Owners, and SEPA Reviewing Agencies FROM: Doug Maples, Manager, Building Codes and Planning Division SUBJECT: Notice of Master Land Use Application concerning property located at 218 N 32nd Avenue UAZO LONG PLAT #2-02, UAZO CL (2) #22-02, UAZO ADM ADJ #10-02, RNV VAC #3-02, UAZO EC#13-02. NOTICE OF APPLICATION The City of Yakima Department of Community & Economic Development has received five related land use applications from Mr. Jim Fickel. The first application requests the subdivision of approximately 4.5 acres of property into 17 Lots (this property is predominately zoned R-2, Two Family Residential with the remainder being R-1, Single - Family Residential.) The second application requests Class (2) land use review for the construction of five duplexes within the R-1 zoned portions of the subdivision. The third application requests a five-foot adjustment of the rear yard setback standards of the R-1 zoning district. The fourth application requests the vacation of the unbuilt portion N 33rd Avenue (the adjacent property owners along Jefferson Avenue have joined in this application), and the final application involves Environmental Review, a state requirement. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call Bruce Benson, Senior Planner at (509) 575-6042 or e-mail at bbenson@ci.yakima.wa.us. REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS Your views on this proposal are welcome. All written comments received by August 12, 2002 will be considered prior to the issuance of a final recommendation on these applications. Please mail your comments on this project to: Doug Maples, Manager Building Codes and Planning Divisions City of Yakima, Department of Community & Economic Development 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, Washington 98901. Please be sure to reference the file number or applicant's name in your correspondence. DOC, INDEX Yakima i• ,! 'r.;1415 o 1 ^,h IT PIN SET 5 56°11'59" E 1.00' FROM CORNER FENCE 0.20' NORTH & 0.60' WEST OF PIN FENCE 0.10' WEST OF PIN FENCE 0.15' WEST OF PIN FENCE 0.30' WEST OF PIN FENCE 1.05' WEST OF PIN 0 1 E ui ENJ (I / / THE PLAT SUV V TVLEW VI\ IYADS SE 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 E.W.M. YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON FENCE 6.6 NORTH 89°58'15"E 12.19' 4 --1- 5' IRR. EASEMENT w w V) < 0 w N o ai a LOT 13 10,972 S.F. 230 N 33RD AVENUE PIN SET 5 74°57'42" E 1,00' FROM CORNER S74.57,4 89.64. 14.50' LOT 14 N 10,912 S.F. 228 N 33RD AVENUE '374 °57,41 HE. 4, LOT 15 10,900 S.F. / 226 N 33RD AVENUE / / / s74.57,4 8, 95. LOT 16 0 10,880 S.F. / 224 N 33RD AVENUE S1 P.U. EA / / 1 / 1 / / Cr) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_ • 133.13' 0 tri i i 25' O 0 85.71 FENCE 0.60' SOUTH & 33' WEST OF PIN LOT 12 7,248 S.F. I8' 8' 233 N 33RD AVENUE 4.00' w N89°58'15" 34.00'0 P 0'o `- 40' 0 2S, r. LOT 9 7,368 S.F. 500001'4 2\ .58' FENCE 0.65' FENCE 0.50' SOUTH OFx PIN NORTH OF PIN 621)8' 227 N 33RD AVENUE LOT 11 1 7,872 S.F. 231 N 33RD AVENUE,, cn CO 0) N89° ;'15"E 11e W "' cd 4,1 Ono Os N89 °58'115"E 12'x34' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 10 7,221 S.F. 229 N 33RD AVENUE cF� 142.80' N89°58' 5'E tI, u 25' 251 c, � E cit z I 25' I 25' --I_- --� - -t s 114.07' LOT 8 3207 FOL.SOM AVENUE 99.38' w 0 ° 0 40.00' 68.73' S00°25'00"E 10' EXISTING WATER, SEWER EASEMENT AUD. FILE NO. 1369579 N89°58'15"E 15 14 22 lilli 23 NE COR, SEC, 22 , T-13 N, R-18 EWM CASED MON. FND. LCR 2M-1632 LOT 7 __31.331 10.00' 3205 FOLSOM AVENUE 100.00' w 10 0 0 0 88.00'- 5' 8.00' 5' IRR. EASEMENT LOT 6 3203 FOLSOM AVENUE o ca 8' P.U. EASEMENT 88.00' 95.00' -+ LOT 5 3201 FOLSOM AVENUE 1 75.41' FOLSOM AVENUE 85.00' 96.90' 0 Q 0 LOT 1 8,313 S.F. 3206 FOLSOM AVENUE I . 25.00' i 25.00' - 105.00' FENCE 1.00' NORTH OF PIN in 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 N89°58'15"E 458.10' LOT 2 w 7,752 S.F. o 3204 FOLSOM AVENUE - 0 0 0 8' P.O. EASEMENT LOT 3 7,753 S,F. 3202 FOLSOM AVENUE 5' IRR, EASEMENT --ti FENCE 0.76' N89°58'15"E FENCE 0.40' SOUTH OF PIN SOUTH OF PIN 10' EXISTING SEWER EASEMENT AUD. FILE NO. 1324564 ALSO AUD. FILE NO. 902779 AUDITORS CERTIFICATE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF JIM FICKEL, "I, JOSEPH ANDREOTTI, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, THIS DAY OF , 20 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS AT MINUTES PAST M AND RECORDED UNDER IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER , RECORDS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT, THAT YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE DISTANCES, COURSES AND ANGLES ARE SHOWN HEREON FEE CORRECTLY, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS AND LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN HEREON," AUDITOR DEPUTY AUDITOR NDREOTTI PLS 5831 Z34 DATED c w 0 ° 0 Q © LOT 4 0 8,294 S.F. 3200 FOLSOM AVENUE 0 co FENCE 0.21' SOUTH OF PIN W IW I (n Li] Iw IQ 30,00' Cr 0 Iz 4.Q 1 0 I � I 0 N I 0Q° z of 41 10 0 , TI 30.00' ( 1 EAST 1/4 SEC. 22 T-13 N, R-18 EWM CASED MON. FND. LCR 2M-1882 N) N ri N KDRE©7111 020©11ATEE ORfl©D CONSULTING ENGINEERS 22 23 CURVE DATA CURVE DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH LONG CHORD BEARING A 89°36'45" 20.00 19.86' 31.28' 28,19' N44°13'23"W B 90°23'15" 20,00' 20.14' - 31.55' 28.38' S44°46'38"W C 90°00'00" 20.00' 20.00' 31.42' 28.28' S44°58'15"W D 90°00'00" 20.00' 20.00' 31.42' 28.28' N45°01'45"W E 11°37'5811 125.00' 12.73' 25.38' 25.34' N5°47'14"E F 3°26'07" 125.00' 3.75' 7.49' 7.49' N13°19'17"E G 15°04'05" 100.00' 13.23' 26.30' 26.22' N7°30'18"E H 15°04'05" 75.00' 9.92' 19.72' 19,67' N7°30'18"E I 28°39'51" 61.00' 15.59' 30.52' 30.20' N29°21'15"E J 46°16'04" 61.00' 26.06' 49.26' 47.93' N66°50'13"E K 45°57'40" 40.00' 16.96' 32.08' 31.23' S67°03'05"E - = 44Q00'49" -'- -':40.0Q`•,'_ 16.17' 30,73', 29.98' S22°04'00"E M 53°52'22" 40.00' 20.33' 37.61' 36.24' N26°54'30"E" N ' 69°00'47" 40,00' 27,50' 48.18' 45.32' N88°21'04"E 0 107°49'07" 20.00' 27.44' 37.64' 32,32' N68°56'54"E P 74°55'55" 36.00' 27.59' 47,08' 43.80' N52°30'18"E SCALE: 1"=40' 40' INTERVALS BASIS OF BEARING: EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 22 TWP13 N, RANGE 18 AS BEING N 0°25'00" W (ASSUMED) MONUMENTATION VISITED 1/2003 SURVEY METHOD; FIELDTRAVERSE W/LIETZ/SOKKISKA SDM3FR10 O REPRESENTS 3/8" REBAR/CAP SET FLUSH WITH CAP 5831 REPRESENTS NAILWITH WASHER • REPRESENTS -REB 1R/CAPFOUND S MONUMENT THE PLAT QF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS SCALE: "=40' DATE: JUNE, 2003 SE 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SEC. 22, TOWNSHIP 13 N,, RANGE 18 EWM • DRAWN BY: JJA SHEET 1 OF 2 c FOR. JIM FICKEL AND BILL LYNCH 305 North 6th Avenue, Yakima, Washington 98902 (509) 453-8281 PARENT PARCEL No, 181322- 14493, -14494, -14495, -14496, -14497, -14515 DRAWING NO. 2632\SURVEY2 10.1 ' �r,It dl IF 2. j .p t„n tv4.a3>� " ri' ; ,:4.'' r ,,, .q 4:'�i: {{�i'.•!~ :ti ' �c. ,- �nr,d', !h . �n5 ,N, F!" k�4 1194Y•1' r�F F 16aWrik .. �, r''.: "";� .� ,: +.t�� Iwf?� :t,�'dt<.sr�.,:Y THE PLAT SU LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARENT PARCELS V V ‚TV' -W (•,tl.I„r� l!,Ip. ! ll�fll!„ �;I„I„ �,' •I.. i, �k; Y' 'I,! , .I,�I� . . II, ,�,, :r.;� .'.I,, 6.1 •�,.. VNEYADS SE 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANCE 18 E.W.M. YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL No. 181322-14493 LOT 1 OF THAT REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0” OF PLATS, PAGE 37. SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14494 LOT 2 OF THAT REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0” OF PLATS, PAGE 37. SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14495 LOT 3 OF THAT REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0" OF PLATS, PAGE 37, SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14496 LOT 4 OF THAT REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0" OF PLATS, PAGE 37, SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14497 LOT 5 OF THAT REPLAT OF SHUMAN ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME "0" OF PLATS, PAGE 37. SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL No. 181322-14515 LOT 2 OF THE SHORT PLAT FILED UNDER YAKIMA COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE No. 7277133. SITUATED IN YAKIMA COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ;sWm a'a'1y. j NOTES: LOTS 4 AND 5 SHALL NOT HAVE DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS ONTO NORTH 32ND AVENUE. DUPLEXES CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16 SHALL BE NO- MORE THAN ONE STORY. IF DUPLEXES ARE CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16, A SIX—FOOT VIEW OBSCURING FENCE OF EQUIVALENTLY EFFECTIVE VEGATATION SCREEN SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NO OTHER SCREEN EXISTS BETWEEN THE LOTS AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES EXISTING AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT FILING. THE ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE OF RECORDING, BUT MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. THE CITY OF YAKIMA BUILDING CODES DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONFIRMATION OR REASSIGNMENT OF ADDRESS AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. SUBJECT TO A DEFERMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE No. RECORDS OF AK I MA COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AUDITORS FILED FOR THIS AT AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER CERTIFICATE RECORD AT THE DAY OF MINUTES PAST REQUEST OF JIM FICKEL, , 20 M AND RECORDED UNDER , RECORDS OF YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FEE AUDITOR DEPUTY AUDITOR APPROVALS f t 0. OWNERS DEDICATION AND WAVER OF CLAIMS "KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT JAMES D. FICKEL AND SHELLY A. FICKEL, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND WILLIAM J. LYNCH, A SINGLE PERSON ARE ALL PARTIES HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREON DESCRIBED; HAVE WITH THEIR FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR DESIRES CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PLATTED AS SHOWN HEREON; DO HEREBY DEDICATE THOSE ROADS AND/OR RIGHT-OF-WAY SHOWN AS PUBLIC DEDICATIONS HEREON TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC; DO HEREBY WAIVE ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF YAKIMA AND ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED TO THE ADJACENT LAND BY THE ESTABLISHED CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID DEDICATE D ROADS AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY; AND DO HEREBY GRANT AND RESERVE THE EASEME S AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE USES INDICATED." STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF YAKIMA SS ON THIS DAY OF, X20 , BEFORE ME APPEARED_ C7=f4 // y 4r •- z ck C KNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(S) DESCRIBED IN & WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT & ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT HE/SHE (THEY) SIGNED THE SAME AS HIS/HER (THEIR) FREE & VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE PURPOSES & USES THEREIN MENTIONED. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET ' ND & AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL. f NO RY 9UBLIC IN & F' THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RE AT fI -J Fit. 2- + - STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF YAKIMA SS ON THIS d$ DAY OF,'i 44 2003 , BEFORE ME APPEARED 6-4.i 40*- 3 . L'v"'Gi.' KNOWN TO BE THE PERSON(S) DESCRIBED IN & WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT & ACKNOWLEDGES TO ME THAT HE/SHE (THEY) SIGNED THE SAME AS HIS/HER (THEIR) FREE & VOLUNTARY-ACTFOR THEIURPOSES &USES THEREIN MENTIONED. IN.WLTNESS_THEREOE,IHAVE_ HEREUNTO SET MY HAND & AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL. NOTARY PUBLIC IN & FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT Ea -I-60,5 Ai4.1-4. THE CITY OF YAKIMA ENGINEER 7- THE CITY OF YAKIMA ADMINISTRATOR 7/v/143 0 4 THE CITY OF YAKIMA MAYOR SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE "I, JOSEPH ANDREOTTI, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT, THAT THE DISTANCES, COURSES AND ANGLES ARE SHOWN HEREON CORRECTLY, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS AND LOT CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN HEREON." 41k. •- Pw ANDR OTTI PLS 5831 DATED Cie s./614 TREASURERS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL CHARGEABLE REGULAR & SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTIBLE BY THIS OFFICE THAT ARE DUE & OWING ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON, ON THIS DATE OF CERTIFICATION, HAVE BEEN PAID. DATED THIO DAY OF , 2043 CO NTY TREASURER'S OFFICE KORIEV70 £3 OC)ClarTE0 OaC� CONSULTING ENGINEERS 305 North 6th Avenue, Yakima, Washington 98902 (509) 453-8281 THE PLAT OF SUMMITVIEW VINEYARDS DATE: JUNE, 2003 SE 1/4, NE 1/4 OF SEC. 22, DRAWN BY: JJA TOWNSHIP 13 N., RANGE 18 EWM SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR: JIM FICKEL AND BILL LYNCH PARENT PARCEL No. 181322- -14493, —14494, —14495, —14496, —14497, —14515 DRAWING NO. 2632\SURVEY2 'ec