HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/15/2025 13.C. Draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025 Annual Action Plan for CDBG and HOME funds � ljlt
ii!
'
r I!I/
sNOW. .
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 13.C.
For Meeting of: July 15, 2025
ITEM TITLE: Draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025 Annual Action Plan for
CDBG and HOME funds
SUBMITTED BY: Bill Preston, Community Development Director
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and 2025 Annual Action Plan have been drafted by Resource
Consultants LLC. The Consolidated Plan documents the community need as well as the implementation
plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program
(HOME)funds over the next five years, while the 2025 Annual Action Plan identifies the actions and
activities that will take place in that program year.
Two public meetings are required to be held to receive public comments on the Consolidated Plan in
accordance with HUD regulations. The first opportunity for public comment took place during the City
Council meeting on November 19, 2024. The second and final public hearing will take place on August 4,
2025.
The draft plans are in the attachment and available for review online in advance of the public hearing:
https://www.yakimawa.gov/services/neighborhood-development-services/
ITEM BUDGETED: Yes
STRATEGIC PRIORITY 24-25: An Engaged Yakima
RECOMMENDATION: Review draft plans prior to public hearing on August 4, 2025.
ATTACHMENTS:
2025-2029 Consolidated Plan &2025 Annual Action Plan DRAFT
176
2025 -2029
•
onso 1 ated Plan
,.,,,....,.....„,..
.......Alir
Alkw
iii
AIWAIW Allilly 0 .1 ..' I ..ii(A AMY
42;014 • • • • 0 • • • • • . ois 1...441/4.0000
011ii
* ••• •
f�
tf',' - \ • • 4rr
ooij'i# ►.I ' r
•
00
I, L.) • • #
r 0
rr
r
r •fo ix . •
.
ill ORAo � 1
1 OR i
1�
iii 11�A1��1�~~~
177
Demo
The Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those
responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and
those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator YAKIMA Office of Neighborhood Development
Services
HOME Administrator YAKIMA Office of Neighborhood Development
Services
Table 1—Responsible Agencies
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 1
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
178
Demo
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 2
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
179
Demo
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 3
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
180
Demo
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 4
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
181
Demo
Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
Needs Assessment Overview
The Needs Assessment(NA) of the Consolidated Plan provides a profile of the City's population, median
income, household demographics, housing problems, cost burden, and crowding. A key goal of the
Needs Assessment is to identify the nature and extent of housing problems experienced by Yakima's
residents. This assessment will form the basis for the Strategic Plan and the activities that will be
supported with CDBG funding.
The City's Needs Assessment was conducted in a variety of ways, including online surveys, data review
and analysis, attending community meetings, and conducting stakeholder interviews to receive citizen
input about housing and community development needs. In addition,the City of Yakima used the
prepopulated data sets provided by HUD including the 2016-2020 American Community Survey(ACS)
data and 2016-2020 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) data, which provides
information on housing needs,to prepare its estimates and projects. Base year data includes the
prepopulated 2005-2009 data sets provided by HUD for use in making longitudinal comparisons.
Additionally,Yakima is part of the Homeless Coalition of Yakima County, which is tasked to carry out the
Continuum of Care responsibilities for the region. Data for the development of the needs for the
homeless in the area have been obtained from the Homeless Coalition.
The Needs Assessment takes particular care to address "disproportionately greater need"for housing,
severe housing problems, and housing cost burden. A disproportionately greater need exists when the
percentage of persons in a category of need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic group in a
category of need is at least 10 percentage points higher than the percentage of persons in the category
as a whole.
Other Key definitions for Needs Assessment:
Small Family Households(2 persons, neither person 62 years or over, or 3 or 4 persons)
Large Family Households (5 or more persons)
Elderly—People aged 62 and up. "Elderly" refers to individuals 62-74, while those 75 and up may be
referred to as "extra elderly" or"frail elderly." Individuals age 75 and up are generally recognized as a
population with different needs than those 62-74, so the CHAS data separates these groups.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 5
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
182
Demo
Community Profile
Yakima, Washington, a community of 93,830 residents and 33,750 households (2016-2020 American
Community Survey), is located in south-central Washington State,within the Yakima Valley, which is
part of the larger Columbia Basin region.The average household size is 2.7 people.The community is
characterized by a mix of family structures, with 38.2%of households identified as married-couple
families and 31.1%led by single female householders.About 33%of households have children under 18,
while 30.9%include someone aged 65 or older—reflecting a median age of 35.9 years. Notably, 29.1%
of householders live alone, and over half of these individuals are seniors.The city's educational
attainment trails the state average, with only 22.9%of residents holding a bachelor's degree or higher.
Disability impacts a significant portion of the population-15.4%—with 40.7%of those affected being
seniors. Additionally,Yakima faces challenges in health care access, as 12.8%of the population lacks
coverage, more than double the state average. Veterans make up 6.6%of the population,further
contributing to the city's diverse demographic profile. 62.4%of the population 5 years and over speak
only English.The most common second language spoken at home is Spanish (35.5%of households)
Yakima experienced minimal population growth from 2009 to 2020, with an estimated increase of only
around 1%.
Race and Ethnicity
85%of people reporting one race alone. Of these people:
• 60.9%were White;
• 1.7%were Black or African American;
• 3%were American Indian and Alaska Native;
• 1.7%were Asian;
• 0.21%were Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander,
• 32.5%were of some other race.
An estimated 14.9%reported Two or more races.
48.5%of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino (46,992). People of Hispanic origin may be of
any race.
Economic Challenges
Yakima faces significant economic challenges that impact many households across the city. While 73.6%
of households earn income from wages or self-employment,the mean household income is$65,314—
well below the state average of$103,669. Employment remains moderate with a 58.4%employment
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 6
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
183
Demo
rate, and income disparities persist by gender and household type. Full-time male workers earn an
average of$54,944, compared to $44,786 for their female counterparts. Female-headed households
with children under 18 are especially vulnerable, with median incomes of just$25,562.
Poverty affects nearly one in five Yakima residents (19.2%), nearly double the state rate.The burden is
disproportionately borne by children-27.4%live in poverty—and by BIPOC populations, including 44%
of American Indian/Alaskan Native residents and 20.8%of Black residents. Public assistance programs
like SNAP are essential to many families; nearly 25%of households participate, and over half of those
include children. Among SNAP recipients, 47%have at least one member with a disability, and nearly
28% include a senior.These figures point to a community with a working population that struggles with
low wages, high poverty, and reliance on social safety nets, particularly among single-parent and
marginalized household.
Housing
Yakima's housing landscape reflects both affordability challenges and aging infrastructure, contributing
to housing insecurity for many residents. With 90,504 total housing units and a 5.1%vacancy rate,the
city maintains a relatively tight housing market.The rental market is especially constrained, with a 2022
rental vacancy rate of just 3%, below the state average. Although median monthly rent in Yakima ($879)
is significantly lower than the statewide median ($1,202),the region's lower incomes mean that many
renters are still cost-burdened. In fact, 69%of renters earning less than 30%of the area median income
are severely cost-burdened, paying more than half of their income on housing.
Homeownership in Yakima stands at 54.6%, and the median monthly housing cost for homeowners with
a mortgage is$1,378. Households that rent earn substantially less than homeowners—$39,080
compared to$67,896—which further exacerbates affordability issues for renters.The city's housing
stock is also relatively old, with 67.3%of units built before 1979 and nearly 18%constructed before
1939, raising concerns about safety, energy efficiency, and habitability. Despite a 17.4%increase in jobs
between 2009 and 2019, housing construction did not keep pace, growing only 3.4%between 2012 and
2022 while the population increased by 6.2%.The combination of rising overcrowding, limited new
housing, and stagnant income growth underscores the growing need for safe, affordable housing in
Yakima.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 7
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
184
Demo
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c)
Summary of Housing Needs
The Housing Needs Assessment relies heavily on prepopulated tables provided to entitlement
communities by HUD. The data sets utilized are primarily CHAS, ACS, and HUD-adjusted median family
incomes (HAMFI).
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS)
In 1990, Congress passed the National Affordable Housing Act, which required that State and local
governments participating in selected HUD grant programs prepare a Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy(CHAS). The CHAS was meant to serve as the strategic guide for housing and
community development activities, particularly activities funded by HUD grants and targeted to low-and
moderate-income households.
The CHAS data combines ACS microdata with HUD-adjusted median family incomes(HAMFI)to
estimate the number of households that qualify for HUD assistance. The CHAS data also incorporate
household characteristics (race/ethnicity, age,family size, disability status) and housing unit
characteristics (such as the number of bedrooms and rent/owner costs).
HUD-Adjusted Median Family Incomes(HAMFI)
If the terms "area median income" (AMI) or"median family income" (MFI) are used in the CHAS, assume
it refers to HAMFI. This is the median family income calculated by HUD for each jurisdiction to
determine Fair Market Rents (FMRs) and HUD programs' income limits. HAMFI will not necessarily be
the same as other calculations of median incomes (such as a simple Census number) due to a series of
adjustments that are made.
The Community Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) evaluates the conditions of families in the area's
lower 80%of the Housing Affordability Median Income.
Income Category
Extremely low-income at or below 30% HAMFI
Very low-income greater than 30%- 50% HAMFI
Low income greater than 50%-80%HAMFI
Low-and middle-income less than 100% HAMFI
Upper income greater than 100% HAMFI
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 8
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
185
Demo
The most relevant income category is 80%of HAMFI because most HUD programs base eligibility on this
threshold, generally referred to as low-to moderate-income.
It is critical to understand how the US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)
evaluates income within a community. HUD sets income limits that determine eligibility for assisted
housing programs, including the Public Housing, Section 8 project-based, Section 8 Housing Choice
Voucher, Section 202 housing for the elderly, and Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities.
US Census estimates the population of Yakima at 93,260 in 2009 and counts 93,860 persons as of July 1,
2020(V202). Yakima's population slightly grew by 1%over that period, compared to a population
increase of 6.3%nationwide.
Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2020 %Change
Population 93,260 93,830 1%
Households 33,080 33,750 2%
Median Income $40,726.00 $48,220.00 18%
Table 2-Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2000 Census(Base Year),2016-2020 ACS(Most Recent Year)
HAMFI in Yakima
A family in Yakima is considered low-to moderate-income j80%HAMFI) if their annual income is;
$53,100 as a single-person household
$60,700 as a two-person household
$68,300 as a three-person household
$75,850 as a four-person household
$81,950 as a five-person household
$88,000 as a six-person household
Number of Households Table
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100%
HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI
Total Households 4,535 4,850 7,780 3,595 12,995
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 9
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
186
Demo
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% >100%
HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI HAMFI
Small Family Households 1,510 1,950 2,515 1,365 5,460
Large Family Households 525 540 1,125 520 1,500
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 760 860 1,605 680 3,270
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older 720 770 1,435 400 1,640
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or younger 1,010 1,355 1,800 850 1,340
Table 3-Total Households Table
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 10
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
187
Demo
Housing Needs Summary Tables
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs)
Renter Owner
0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total
AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing-
Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen
facilities 215 90 80 25 410 0 10 0 0 10
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51
people per
room (and
complete
kitchen and
plumbing) 225 460 360 120 1,165 0 0 80 0 80
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per
room (and
none of the
above
problems) 130 150 405 130 815 95 75 250 75 495
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50%of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 1,860 865 305 15 3,045 695 350 265 65 1,375
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 11
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
188
Demo
Renter Owner
0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total
AMI 50% 80% 100% AMI 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30%of
income (and
none of the
above
problems) 340 1,180 800 240 2,560 260 570 1,150 290 2,270
Zero/negative
Income (and
none of the
above 1
problems) 195 0 0 0 195 20 0 0 0 20
Table 4—Housing Problems Table
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen
or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden)
Renter Owner
0-30% >30- >50- >80- Total 0- >30- >50- >80- Total
AMI 50% 80% 100% 30% 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more
of four housing
problems 2,430 1,565 1,150 290 5,435 790 435 595 140 1,960
Having none of
four housing
problems 860 1,800 2,585 1,475 6,720 455 1,045 3,450 1,690 6,640
Household has
negative income,
but none of the
other housing
problems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 5—Housing Problems 2
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 12
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
189
Demo
3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter Owner
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% Total 0-30% >30- >50-80% Total
AMI AMI AMI AMI 50% AMI
AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 1,140 1,155 360 2,655 225 310 365 900
Large Related 295 240 105 640 150 200 140 490
Elderly 485 515 445 1,445 585 340 680 1,605
Other 840 655 265 1,760 50 80 310 440
Total need by 2,760 2,565 1,175 6,500 1,010 930 1,495 3,435
income
Table 6—Cost Burden>30%
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
4. Cost Burden > 50%
Renter Owner
0-30% >30-50% >50- Total 0-30% >30- >50- Total
AMI AMI 80% AMI 50% 80%
AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 0 0 310 310 165 135 0 300
Large Related 0 0 50 50 80 25 0 105
Elderly 340 330 280 950 445 140 105 690
Other 0 710 235 945 30 0 0 30
Total need by 340 1,040 875 2,255 720 300 105 1,125
income
Table 7—Cost Burden>50%
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 13
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
190
Demo
In Yakima,WA Metro Ana,renter households with incomes of 820.000-$35,000 had the highest incidence of cost burden in 2023(82.7%).As shown
in the previous visualization,the share of households rent burdened in Yakima,WA Metro Area increased overall from 2018 to 2023.
00%
I
io%
0„
^.O S20.000435.000 -'5.000-SS).' `.7.000-175- 575 000.
Source:Census 0
Renter Cost Burden By Income- Local Housing Solutions
5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter Owner
0- >30- >50- >80- Total 0- >30- >50- >80- Total
30% 50% 80% 100% 30% 50% 80% 100%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
households 305 570 610 175 1,660 40 75 220 45 380
Multiple,
unrelated family
households 55 40 100 25 220 55 0 110 30 195
Other, non-family
households 10 0 60 50 120 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by 370 610 770 250 2,000 95 75 330 75 575
income
Table 8—Crowding Information—1/2
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Renter Owner
0- >30- >50- Total 0- >30- >50- Total
30% 50% 80% 30% 50% 80%
AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI
Households with
Children Present 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 9—Crowding Information—2/2
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 14
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
191
Demo
Data Source
Comments:
Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.
The total number of occupied housing units in Yakima during this time is 33,752,with a median income
of$44,220.
Of these households, 29% householders live alone(single person households):
• Householder living alone are most likely to be 65 years or older(14%); compared to 11.6%of
householders living alone that are between 35 to 64 years old and 3.6%of householders living
alone that are 15 to 34 years old.
• The number of single person male households totals 3,922 (25.4%); 1,404(35.8%) of these male
alone households are individuals that are 65 years and older. Male full-time, year-round
workers had median earnings of$40,593.This person would be considered low-moderate
income (LMI) as the threshold for a single person household is $50,400.
• The number of single person female households is 5,909(32.2%); 3,314(56%) of these female
alone households are individuals 65 years and older. Female full-time,year-round workers
had median earnings of$36,257.This person would be considered low-moderate income (LMI)
as the threshold for a single person household is $50,400.
• 25.1%of householders living alone are homeowners; 33.9%are renters.
Single person households are likely to be female. Over half of the single female households are
individuals 65 years and older.They are more likely to be renters living in a lower income bracket and
experiencing a housing cost burden.
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or
victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.
Domestic Violence
Yakima has critical resources for addressing domestic violence, namely through the Yakima Domestic
Violence Coalition; emergency shelter,transitional housing, permanent housing, and legal services
through the YWCA; and advocacy, counseling, resource referrals through Aspen Victim Advocacy
Services. Additionally,the Yakima Housing Authority has a preference for victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, or human trafficking for the regular Housing Choice Voucher program.
The 2024 Point In Time Count reported the following numbers individuals being served at domestic
violence shelters on a single night in January:
• The Lighthouse—4
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 15
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
192
Demo
• YWCA —31
Disability
Federal nondiscrimination laws define a person with a disability to include any: (1) individual with a
physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) individual
with a record of such impairment; or(3) individual who is regarded as having such an impairment.
In general, a physical or mental impairment includes, but is not limited to, examples of conditions such
as orthopedic, visual, speech, and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, autism, epilepsy, muscular
dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV),
developmental disabilities, mental illness, drug addiction, and alcoholism. In general,the definition of
"person with a disability" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances but does
provide protections for individuals with drug or alcohol addiction. Individuals would also be protected
under Section 504 and the ADA if the purpose of the specific program or activity is to provide health or
rehabilitation services to such individuals.
The American Community Survey(ACS) estimates that 16.8%of the population in Yakima has a
disability, compared to a national average of 13.4%.aAAAAAAc Additionally, 40.7%of Yakima
residents with a reported disability are 65 years of age and over. The City of Yakima has the most
persons with a disability in the county,which is a reflection that Yakima is the central city in the county
and has extensive medical and human services. US Census Data estimates that in 2020 the poverty rate
for people with disabilities is approximately 27%, compared to 11%for persons without disabilities. Data
from the National Disability Institute (NDI) shows that individuals with disabilities face higher levels of
unemployment, lower education attainment, and more significant barriers to economic participation,
contributing to this intersection of poverty and disability.To assist individuals with disabilities, Entrust
Community Services offers a myriad of services, including:
• High school transitions to help youth with disabilities achieve a successful transition from school
to their life following school;
• Individual supported employment to help people prepare for,find, and keep jobs in the
community;
• Community access through basic skills development that help people make social and
recreational connections; and
• Housing support that meets the unique personal and financial needs of clients.
What are the most common housing problems?
The most common housing problem in the City of Yakima continues to be housing affordability.
According to the 2016-2020 ACS and CHAS data, 3,045 renter households are considered severely cost
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 16
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
193
Demo
burdened; of these households, 61%are considered extremely low income (0-30%AMI). Additionally,
the elderly population is disproportionally impacted by these housing costs. Of the households that are
considered severely cost burdened, 100%of households are considered elderly households as well.
Housing costs are affecting extremely low-income home owners as well;there are 1,375 home owner
households that are considered severely cost-burdened. Of these, nearly 51%are extremely low income.
Nearly 62%of the extremely low-income households that are severely cost burdened are considered
elderly.
Additionally, housing data highlights the lack of affordable and ADA-compliant housing across the
nation. In "The State of the Nation's Housing" 2022 report, it's reported that a "vast majority of US
homes lack basic accessibility features—such as no-step entryway and grab bars in the bathroom—that
older adults and people with disabilities often need to live safely in their homes."
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?
Renter households with worst-case housing needs are those with very low incomes that do not receive
government housing assistance and pay more than one-half of their incomes toward rent,those that live
in severely inadequate conditions, or both. aAAAAc This population of residents faces the greatest risk
of becoming homeless or having unstable housing.
The greatest housing needs in Yakima exist among renters, particularly those with incomes at or below
30%of AMI. Elderly households are a significant portion of the population in need, both for renters and
owners.This suggests the need for affordable housing options and supportive services geared toward
aging residents.
Which households can have worst-case needs?
By definition, households that can have worst-case needs are households that--
1. Are renters. -
1. Have-very low incomes—incomes of no more than 50 percent of the area median income
(adjusted for family size).
1. Do not receive housing assistance.
Priority problems trigger worst-case needs
Two types of priority problems determine whether households have worst-case needs:A
1. Severe rent burden means that a renter household pays more than one-half of its income for
gross rent (rent and utilities).
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 17
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
194
Demo
1. Severely inadequate housing-refers to units having one or more serious physical problems
related to heating, plumbing, and electrical systems or maintenance-
"Worst Case Housing Needs, 2019 Report to Congress"U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Office of Policy Development and Research
Additionally, Elderly households, both renters and homeowners, especially those earning 0-30%AMI,
are likely to be disproportionately affected by severe housing problems. Housing affordability and home
repair assistance programs that address aging in place should also be prioritized.
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children
(especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of
either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)).Also discuss the
needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing
assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance
TheaAAACMcKinney-Vento Act,aAAAz which later became part of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB),
mandates protections and services for homeless children and youth, including those with disabilities.
The 2004 reauthorization of IDEA also includes amendments that reinforce timely assessment, inclusion,
and continuity of services for homeless children and youth with disabilities.
McKinney-Vento Definition of Homelessness is anyone who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate
nighttime residence, including:
• Sharing the housing of others due to lack of housing, economic hardship, or similar reason
• Living in motels, hotels,trailer parks, and camping grounds due to a lack of adequate alternative
accommodations
• Living in emergency or transitional shelters
• Abandoned in hospitals
• Awaiting foster care placement
• Living in a public or private place not designed for humans to live
• Living in cars, parks, abandoned buildings, public train stations, etc.
• A migrant child who qualifies under any of the above
The major causes of homelessness for children in the U.S. involve both structural and individual factors,
including:
• the nation's persistently high rates of poverty for families;aAAAc
• a lack of affordable housing across the nation;aAAAc
• continuing impacts of the Great Recession;aAAAc
• racial disparities in homelessness;
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 18
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
195
Demo
• the challenges of single parenting; andaAAAc
• the ways in which traumatic experiences, especially domestic violence, precede and prolong
homelessness for families.
"America's Youngest Outcasts-A Report on Child Homelessness"AAAAC American Institutes for
Research, 2014.
Homelessness can have a tremendous impact on children—their education, health, sense of safety, and
overall development. Fortunately, researchers found that children are also highly resilient. Differences
between children who have experienced homelessness and low-income children who have not
experienced homelessness typically diminish in the years following a homeless episode.
When compared to low-income and homeless families, children experiencing homelessness have been
shown to:
• Have higher levels of emotional and behavioral problems;
• Have increased risk of serious health problems;
• Are more likely to experience separations from their families; and
• Experience more school mobility, repeat a grade, are more likely to be expelled or drop out of
school, and have lower academic performance.
"National Alliance to End Homelessness"
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a
description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to
generate the estimates:
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an
increased risk of homelessness
Housing cost burden continues to be a primary risk for low-income individuals and families with children
at risk of experiencing homelessness.The National Alliance to End Homelessness states that "low-
income households are typically unemployed or underemployed due to many factors, such as a
challenging labor market, limited education, a gap in work history, a criminal record, unreliable
transportation or unstable housing, poor health, or a disability.aAAc- AAz For those who are low-
income but employed, wages have been stagnant and have not kept pace with expensive housing costs.
The typical American worker has seen little to no growth in his/her weekly wages over the past three
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 19
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
196
Demo
decades.Too little income combined with the dwindling availability of low-cost housing leaves many
people at risk for becoming homeless."
Other than income, some other characteristics can also predispose an individual or household to
homelessness, including:
• Persons leaving institutions: detox, mental hospitals, prisons, etc.
• Households paying more than 50%of income for housing costs
• Victims of domestic violence
• Special needs populations (persons with AIDS, disabilities, drug or alcohol addiction, etc.)
• Single parent head of households who are unemployed
• People who are doubling up in unstable living arrangements (and cannot be counted as
homeless)
• Families living below the poverty IevelaAAc
Households that exhibit one or more of these characteristics constitute a population that is "at-risk" of
becoming homeless.These individuals and families are at risk of becoming homeless because they have
a lesser chance of making economic improvements in their Iives.aAAc
Discussion
Housing is Out of Reach
There is a significant gap between renters' wages and the cost of rental housing across the United
States.aAz-A full-time worker needs to earn an hourly wage of$40.32 on average to afford a modest,
two-bedroom rental home in the state of Washington.This "Housing Wage"for a two-bedroom home
is $33.07 higher than the federal minimum wage of$7.25 and $24.04 higher than the Washington
minimum hourly wage of$16.28(non-tipped workers) earned by renters.aAc
Renters with the lowest incomes face the greatest challenge in finding affordable housing.The average
minimum wage worker in Washington must work nearly 83 hours per week to afford a modest one-
bedroom rental home at the average fair market rent.aAC
A full-time worker needs to earn an hourly wage of$33.77 to afford a one-bedroom rental home. Many
occupations do not earn enough annually to afford housing.The median hourly wage for the following
positions reflects the shortfall:
• Fast food and counter workers-$17.58
• Cashiers-$17.77
• Retail salespersons-$18.38
• Home health and personal care aids-$20.85
• Cooks, restaurant-$21.67
• Waiters and waitresses-$24.12
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 20
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
197
Demo
"Out of Reach 2024"&A�-National Low Income Housing Coalition
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 21
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
198
Demo
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems — 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction
CDBG entitlement communities are to provide an assessment for each of the disproportionately greater
needs identified.AAAAC Although the purpose of these tables is to analyze the relative level of need for
each race and ethnic category,the data also provide information for Yakima as a whole that can be
useful in describing the overall need.aAAAc
Income Category
• Extremely low-income at or below 30% HAMFI
• Very low-income greater than 30%-50% HAMFI
• Low income greater than 50%-80% HAMFI
• Low-and middle-income less than 100% HAMFI
• Upper income greater than 100% HAMFI
The most relevant thresholds are 50%and 80%of HAMFI because most HUD programs base eligibility on
these thresholds (which are generally referred to as "very low-income" and "low-income,"
respectively).
Housing Problems
There are four housing problems in the CHAS data:
• The housing unit lacks complete kitchen facilities
• The housing unit lacks complete plumbing facilities;
• Household is overcrowded
• Household is cost-burdened.
A household is said to have a housing problem if they have one or more of these four problems.
Overcrowding is one of the four housing problems evaluated by HUD.
HUD defines overcrowding as:
• Overcrowding- More than one person per room.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 22
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
199
Demo
• Severe overcrowding- More than 1.5 persons per room.
HUD defines cost burden as:
• Cost burden - Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 30%of monthly income.
• Severe cost burden - Monthly housing costs (including utilities) exceeding 50%of monthly
income.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,820 720 0
White 1,780 460 0
Black/African American 25 0 0
Asian 70 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 135 40 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,670 190 0
Table 10-Disproportionally Greater Need 0-30%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,750 1,095 0
White 2,075 650 0
Black/African American 20 0 0
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 23
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
200
Demo
Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Asian 45 20 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 115 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,395 390 0
Table 11-Disproportionally Greater Need 30-50%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,695 4,080 0
White 1,940 2,285 0
Black/African American 145 95 0
Asian 50 25 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 4 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,485 1,600 0
Table 12-Disproportionally Greater Need 50-80%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 24
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
201
Demo
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 960 2,635 0
White 580 1,545 0
Black/African American 0 10 0
Asian 10 10 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 20 0
Pacific Islander 25 65 0
Hispanic 290 955 0
Table 13-Disproportionally Greater Need 80-100%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than one person per
room, 4.Cost Burden greater than 30%
Discussion
An estimated 85%of people reporting one race alone. Of these people:
• 60.9%were White;
• 1.7%were Black or African American;
• 3%were American Indian and Alaska Native;
• 1.7%were Asian;
• 0.21%were Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander,
• 32.5%were of some other race.
An estimated 14.9%reported Two or more races.
Additionally, an estimated 48.5%of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino (46,992). People of
Hispanic origin may be of any race.
An analysis of housing data for the City of Yakima shows that there are no racial or ethnic groups being
disproportionally impacted by housing problems, but income is an indicator of experiencing a housing
problem.The data reveals extremely low-income(0-30%of Area Median Income) and low-income (31-
50%of Area Median Income) households are significantly more likely to encounter at least one housing
problem, such as cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing conditions, regardless of race.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 25
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
202
Demo
These income groups face the greatest challenges in accessing affordable, safe, and adequate housing,
underscoring the need for targeted interventions to address their specific housing needs.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 26
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
203
Demo
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems — 91.205
(b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction
A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at a given income
level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10%or more)than the income level as a whole.
Severe housing problemsaAAz-include:
• Overcrowded households with 1.5 persons per room, not including bathrooms, porches,foyers,
halls, or half-rooms
• Households with cost burdens of more than 50%of income
The "2019 County Health Ranking Key Report" by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that
"many households are just one unforeseen event—an illness,job loss,financial crisis, or even a drop-in
hour at work—from losing their home.The risk for homelessness is especially high for low-income
families spending more than half of household income on housing costs.aAAz Families that face
insecure housing,forced moves, or homelessness are more likely to experience poor mental or physical
health and preventable hospitalizations. For children in these families, experiencingaAAc homelessness
can also be harmful to brain and body function and development, with lifelong and cumulative negative
healthaAAc outcomes for the child,the family, and the community."
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 3,220 1,315 0
White 1,455 790 0
Black/African American 19 10 0
Asian 70 0 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 135 40 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 1,415 445 0
Table 14—Severe Housing Problems 0-30%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 27
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
204
Demo
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,000 2,845 0
White 1,205 1,525 0
Black/African American 20 0 0
Asian 20 45 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 30 85 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 665 1,125 0
Table 15—Severe Housing Problems 30-50%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,745 6,035 0
White 715 3,510 0
Black/African American 85 150 0
Asian 30 45 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 4 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 910 2,175 0
Table 16—Severe Housing Problems 50-80%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 28
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
205
Demo
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems* Has one or more Has none of the Household has
of four housing four housing no/negative
problems problems income, but none
of the other
housing problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 430 3,165 0
White 115 2,015 0
Black/African American 0 10 0
Asian 0 25 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 20 0
Pacific Islander 25 65 0
Hispanic 250 1,000 0
Table 17—Severe Housing Problems 80-100%AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
*The four severe housing problems are:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities, 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities, 3. More than 1.5 persons per
room, 4.Cost Burden over 50%
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 29
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
206
Demo
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens — 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to
the needs of that category of need as a whole.
Introduction:
This section evaluates the housing cost burden from a racial or ethnic group perspective.AAAC Cost
burden is the fraction of a household's total gross income spent on housing costs.aAAz For renters,
housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities.aAAz For homeowners, housing costs include
mortgage payments,taxes, insurance, and utilities.
A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group at an income
level experience housing problems at a greater rate (10%or more)than the income level as a
whole.aAAz-aAAz-
HUD defines cost-burdened families as those "who pay more than 30 percent of their income for
housing" and "may have difficulty affording necessities such as food, clothing,transportation, and
medical care." Severe rent burden is defined as paying more than 50 percent of one's income on rent.
The tables display cost burden information for Yakima and each racial and ethnic group.aAAc
Cost Burden is described in the tables as:
• No cost burden (less than 30%)
• Cost burden (30-50%)
• Severe cost burden (more than 50%)
• No/negative income.aAAz No/negative income households are those whose income is zero or
negative due to self-employment, dividends, and net rental income.AAAC These households are
not included in the other two categories but still require housing assistance and are counted
separately.
Data from the American Housing Survey and the American Community Survey indicate that severe
rental burdens disproportionately impact poor families.The Worst Case Housing Needs surveys the
number of very low-income families (those earning less than 50 percent of the area median income)
who pay more than half their income in rent, have substandard housing conditions, or both. Rental
Burdens:Rethinking Affordability Measures,&AA�-HUD PD&R Edge
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 30
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
207
Demo
Housing Cost Burden
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No/ negative
income(not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 22,485 6,045 5,000 225
White 14,355 3,435 2,830 95
Black/African
American 285 70 55 0
Asian 220 55 90 0
American Indian,
Alaska Native 185 115 135 30
Pacific Islander 120 0 0 0
Hispanic 6,915 2,215 1,670 100
Table 18—Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data 2016-2020 CHAS
Source:
30%Affordability Rule-A Discussion
With the cost of housing on the rise, researchers are reexamining the 30-percent rule of thumb for
measuring rental burden. HUD defines cost-burdened families as those "who pay more than 30 percent
of their income for housing" and "may have difficulty affording necessities such as food, clothing,
transportation, and medical care." Severe rent burden is defined as paying more than 50 percent of
one's income on rent.
The 30-percent rule —that a household should spend no more than 30 percent of its income on
housing costs — has long been accepted in academic circles and is often included in blogs and websites
on family budgeting. A recent Business Week article, however, argues that the 30-percent rule is "nearly
useless."The authors suggest that calculating housing cost burden using only income ratios
oversimplifies the issue of housing affordability. Frank Nothaft, chief economist at Freddie Mac, is
quoted in the article as saying, "If your income is $500,000 a year, you can pay 40 percent and still have
money left. ButaCif your income is$20,000 a year, it will be hard to make ends meet if you're paying 30
percent of your income on rent."
In discussing the rental affordability measurement to Business Week, David Bieri of the University of
Michigan states that the 30-percent rule "[is] essentially an arbitrary number." One of the arguments
against the share of income approach is that different households earning the same annual income
spend considerably different amounts of money on basic necessities. For example,-families with
children spend more on clothing,food, and medical bills than single adults.-Thus, a household with
children that spends 50 percent of its income on housing might be cost-burdened, whereas a single
adult who earns the same salary and spends the same percentage of income on housing might not be. In
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 31
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
208
Demo
addition,the share of income measure does not consider cost-of-living differences in areas where
housing is expensive.
Discussion:
A disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of need who are
members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least 10 percentage points higher than the
percentage of persons in the category as a whole. Within Yakima, no groups meet this HUD definition.
It's important to note that approximately nearly 15%of the jurisdiction as a whole is considered
severely cost burdened, paying 50%or more of their income towards housing costs; nearly 18%of the
jurisdiction is considered cost burdened.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 32
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
209
Demo
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion — 91.205(b)(2)
Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately
greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?
A disproportionately greater number of housing problems would exist when members of any particular
racial or ethnic group at an income level experience housing problems at a rate greater than 10%of the
percentage of the same racial or ethnic group population as a whole. Within Yakima, no groups meet
this HUD definition.
If they have needs not identified above,what are those needs?
While there are no groups to meet HUD's definition, it's important to note that any group of persons
that is extremely low or low income are more likely to experience housing conditions.These groups face
the greatest challenges in accessing affordable, safe, and adequate housing, underscoring the need for
targeted interventions to address their specific housing needs. Experiencing one or more housing
problems—such as overcrowding, cost burden, lack of kitchen facilities, or inadequate plumbing—often
exacerbates other challenges that low-income households face. Housing instability can lead to frequent
moves, disrupting employment and children's education. Cost-burdened households may struggle to
afford other necessities like healthcare,transportation, and nutritious food. Additionally, substandard
housing conditions can negatively impact physical and mental health, increasing the likelihood of
respiratory illnesses, stress, and anxiety.The City of Yakima will continue to do the following:
• More outreach to these marginalized groups on Fair Housing Choice.aAz AAc
• More outreach to the rental agencies and property managers on Fair Housing Choice.AAc
• Additional supports to ensure that these renters and homeowners have access to resources and
funding for to ease cost burden, overcrowding, and address substandard living conditions.AAc
Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your
community?
To assist communities in identifyingaAz-racially/ethnically-concentrated areas of poverty
(R/ECAPs),AAc HUD has developed a census tract-based definition of R/ECAPs.The definition involves a
racial/ethnic concentration threshold and a poverty test.The racial/ethnic concentration threshold is
straightforward: R/ECAPs must have a non-white population of 50 percent or more. Regarding the
poverty threshold, Wilson (1980) defines neighborhoods of extreme poverty as census tracts with 40
percent or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line. HUD supplements this with an
alternate criterion because overall poverty levels are substantially lower in many parts of the country.
Thus, a neighborhood can be a R/ECAP if it has a poverty rate that exceeds 40%or is three or more
times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan/micropolitan area,whichever threshold is
lower. Currently,the city of Yakima does not have any racially/ethnically-concentrated areas of
poverty.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 33
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
210
Demo
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 34
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
211
Demo
NA-35 Public Housing — 91.205(b)
Introduction
YHA only administers Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV's);YHA does not operate public housing. According to YHA's 2024 Annual Plan,YHA
currently administers 1,312 HCV's.YHA currently has a "high" performance rating in the Section Eight Management Assessment Program
(SEMAP). SEMAP measures the performance of the public housing agencies (PHAs)that administer the Housing Choice Voucher program in 14
key areas. SEMAP helps HUD target monitoring and assistance to PHA programs that need the most improvement.
YHA housing programs include:
• Family Housing Program:YHA owns and operates 150 units and offers a variety of housing to applicants so they can choose the type that
best fits their family's needs.
• Farm Worker Housing Program:YHA owns and operates 172 units of agricultural rental housing which are located on 456 sites
throughout Yakima County. Units range from one to five bedrooms. Additionally, 10 units are dedicated to migrant worker housing and 6
units of H-2A housing.
• Section 8/Housing Choice Voucher Program:YHA provides rental assistance to low-income families in the private market. Population
specific vouchers include vouchers for veterans and non-elderly disables households.
• Elderly and Disabled Housing:YHA owns and operates 88 Elderly and Disabled units. All units are one bedroom.
• Homeless Housing:YHA offers 27 units for homeless housing. Additionally YHA has partnered with several non-profit organizations and
Yakima County's Department of Human Services and Grant Management to provide housing and services to the homeless.There are 75
vouchers throughout Yakima County specifically set aside for individuals and families who qualify as homeless.aAAAAAAz In addition,
each individual receives assistance with health care, substance abuse and job training.
• Fruitvale Housing: Fruitvale Housing and YHA have partnered together to build 54 units of affordable housing.
• Veteran Supportive Housing: Chuck Austin Place is a 41 unit, permanent supportive housing development serving formerly homeless
veterans and 12,000 SF supportive service center for both residents and the veteran and homeless community.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 35
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
212
Demo
YHA resident services include:
• Family Self-Sufficiency Program:This program helps residents increase their skill levels, education, and employment,to become self-
supporting.The FSS Program is open to households,with or without children.
• Family Fun Night Community Resource Fair:This free community event will features dozens of vendors, providing an array of offerings
from local community organizations and service providers.
• Sharon Wandler Scholarship:Three scholarships will be awarded to candidates pursuing their first degree. One scholarship, which will be
awarded to a returning college attendee, and two scholarships for High School Graduates or GED holder.aAAAAAAc
• Moving to Work: Helps YHA to maximize the number of households served through the voucher program and making changes to the
voucher program to make it more efficient to operate, more likely to increase the self-sufficiency, and housing choice as well as the
required activities related to landlord incentives.aAAAAAAz aAAAAAAc
Totals in Use
Program Type
Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project- Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
#of units vouchers in use 0 0 149 644 58 553 33 0 0
Table 19-Public Housing by Program Type
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year,and Nursing Home Transition
Data Source: PIC(PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 36
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
213
Demo
Characteristics of Residents
Program Type
Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project- Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
Average Annual Income 0 0 14,000 11,552 9,970 11,822 9,800 0
Average length of stay 0 0 4 5 0 5 0 0
Average Household size 0 0 3 2 3 2 1 0
# Homeless at admission 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#of Elderly Program Participants
(>62) 0 0 12 146 1 138 7 0
#of Disabled Families 0 0 26 199 11 171 17 0
#of Families requesting
accessibility features 0 0 149 644 58 553 33 0
#of HIV/AIDS program
participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 20—Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC(PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 37
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
214
Demo
Race of Residents
Program Type
Race Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project- Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification *
Supportive Program
Housing
White 0 0 142 570 48 492 30 0 0
Black/African American 0 0 2 45 5 37 3 0 0
Asian 0 0 1 7 1 6 0 0 0
American Indian/Alaska
Native 0 0 4 21 4 17 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year,and Nursing Home Transition
Table 21—Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC(PIH Information Center)
Ethnicity of Residents
Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate Mod- Public Vouchers
Rehab Housing Total Project- Tenant- Special Purpose Voucher
based based Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
Hispanic 0 0 117 163 21 137 5 0 0
Not Hispanic 0 0 32 481 37 416 28 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year,and Nursing Home Transition
Table 22—Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 38
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
215
Demo
Data Source: PIC(PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 39
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
216
Demo
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants
on the waiting list for accessible units:
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. §794,that prohibits
discrimination based on disability in federally-assisted programs or activities. Specifically, Section 504
states, "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States. ..shall, solely by reason of
her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program, service or activity receiving federal financial assistance or under any
program or activity conducted by any Executive agency or by the United States Postal Service."This
means that Section 504 prohibits discrimination based on disability in any program or activity that
receives financial assistance from any federal agency, including HUD, as well as in programs conducted
by federal agencies, including HUD.
An individual with a disability is any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially
limits one or more major life activities.The term physical or mental impairment may include, but is not
limited to, conditions such as visual or hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection,
developmental disabilities, drug addiction, or mental illness. In general,the definition of"person with
disabilities" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances. However, individuals would
be protected under Section 504 (as well as the ADA) if the purpose of the specific program or activity is
to provide health or rehabilitation services to such individuals.
The term major life activity may include: seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks,
caring for one's self, learning, speaking, or working.This list is not exhaustive. Section 504 also protects
persons who have a record of such impairment or are regarded as having such an impairment.YHA has
fully accessible units and can make reasonable accommodations for tenants.
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders
Key Immediate Needs:
• Access to Affordable Housing:YHA operates a computer-generated lottery for the Section 8
waiting List. Due to limited supply, everyone who applies is added to the waiting list. Even those
who have received vouchers struggle to find housing within the program's payment standards as
these standards are not in alignment with market rent rates.
• Increased Landlord Participation:The number of landlords accepting Housing Choice Vouchers
has declined, partly due to the ability to secure higher rents from tenants without vouchers.This
trend limits housing options for voucher holders and exacerbates the housing shortage.
• Improved Housing Conditions:Many affordable housing units in Roanoke are in substandard
condition,featuring issues like exposed wiring, mold, and structural hazards.These conditions
compromise the safety and well-being of residents.aAAAAz aAAAAz aAAAAc
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 40
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
217
Demo
Addressing these immediate needs requires coordinated efforts to secure additional funding, encourage
landlord participation, improve housing conditions, and expand the availability of affordable housing
units. Such measures are essential to support the well-being of YHA residents.
How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large
The challenges of housing cost burden impact almost all families, regardless of the income Ievel.aAAc
Housing cost burdens impact middle-income families who have a more significant challenge saving for
emergencies and maintaining their home or saving for homeownership.aAAz Households with a high-
cost burden, regardless of income, are at a greater risk of losing their housing.
Discussion
Public housing authority tenants often face multiple challenges that extend beyond the need for
affordable rent. Many residents have low or fixed incomes, making it difficult to afford essentials like
food, healthcare, and transportation. According to HUD, over 50%of public housing households are
headed by elderly or disabled individuals, highlighting the need for accessible housing, supportive
services, and healthcare access. Reliable transportation is also a significant issue, as many public housing
developments are located in areas with limited public transit options, making it harder for tenants to
access jobs, education, and medical care. Additionally, safety and community services are key concerns,
with many residents advocating for improved security measures, youth programs, and workforce
development initiatives. With more than 1.7 million Americans living in public housing, addressing
these needs through expanded social services, better infrastructure, and economic opportunities is
essential to improving the quality of life for public housing residents.aAc
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 41
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
218
Demo
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment — 91.205(c)
Introduction:
A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a geographically based group of representatives that carries out the planning responsibilities of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) CoC Homeless Assistance Program.These representatives come from organizations
that provide services to people experiencing homelessness.
The Department of Commerce is the Collaborative Applicant for the Washington Balance of State Continuum of Care (BoS CoC).The BoS CoC's
34 small and medium sized counties received about$8 million annually for 50 permanent and temporary housing projects funded by HUD's CoC
program.Yakima County elects 2 representatives to the BoS CoC Board (Steering Committee).The Steering Committee meets monthly virtually
and hybrid quarterly.There are several subcommittees that address subpopulations: Families without Children—Chronic Homeless,Youth,
Veterans, Racial Equity, and Families with Children. Each committee typically meets 8-10 times per year.Yakima County also formed the Yakima
County Homeless Coalition (YHC), which aims to address the wide range of matters associated with homelessness in Yakima County with the
goals of making homelessness brief and rare.
The Department of Commerce coordinates the annual Point-In-Time (PIT) count with and reports results to the State Legislature and HUD. 2024
County PIT data is used within this section. Due to the nature of a one-night count,the uses of the PIT Count data and its limitations should
beaAAAAc noted. It is understood that a one-night point in time count has limitations and in any given year mayaAAAACunder-count or over-
count the homeless population when compared to data collected over a more extended period of time or at other periodic intervals.The
greatest value of the PIT Count is that it is anaAAAAc unduplicated count of both sheltered and unsheltered persons experiencing homelessness
on one night. aAAAAz Decreases or increases in the number of persons counted from year to year may indicate a change inaAAAAc the
homeless population or external circumstances or both.aAAAAz Because of the limitations of PIT Count Data, data pulled from Yakima County's
consolidated homeless grant performance tracker dashboard.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 42
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
219
Demo
Individuals Surveyed Who Are Veterans
YEAR BY YEAR PERCENT CHRONICALLY
HOMELESS
2023 •2024
15
32
30 29 2022 2023 2024
25 Chronically
Homeless 509i, 41% 5396
20
Not Chronically 45% 52% 4 rh
Homeless
15 •
Unknown 5% 7% 0%
10
Grand Total 100% 100% 100%
5
0
I ►
BY HOUSING TYPE RECEIVING VETERANS
BENEFITS
2023 2024
2022 2023 2024
mergency Shelter 18
�cs 104 349i
Sanctioned Fra-ampment 4
No 85% 79% 56%
Transil:nnai Ilnu•dn� 0
Unknowr 15% 41' 109r,
Unsheltered I c r
Grand Total 100% 100% 100%
Grand Total 29 32
Yakima County PIT Count 2024 VETERANS
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 43
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
220
Demo
Race and Ethnicity of Individuals Surveyed
RACE AND ETHNICITY COMBINED
Not a Person of
Ethnicity person or rNr.
White
Amercan Indian.Alaska Native,or Indigenous
Black.African American.or Afncan 11
64ulti-Racial
•
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Asian or Asian American -.
'ddte Eastern/North African
.,,cam:prefers not to answer,data not collected
White
H s pan lc/l at m to N o ll.l
American Indian,Alaska Native,or Indigenous
Black,African American.or Afncan
Iti spaniclatinhal loHal
Multi Racial --
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Asian or Asian American
Client prefers not to answer,data not collected •
kn c+.1 Gent prefers not to answer,data not collected
'For the privacy or people entered into HMIS.The Depenmeni of Human Servn:es
Contmarce's preecnbed data suppression standards.
Yakima County PIT Count 2024 Race Ethnicity
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 44
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
221
Demo
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of
days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically
homeless individuals and families,families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 45
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
222
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
White 0 0
Black or African American 0 0
Asian 0 0
American Indian or Alaska
Native 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0
Ethnicity: Sheltered: Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic 0 0
Not Hispanic 0 0
Data Source
Comments:
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with
children and the families of veterans.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.
See attached data from 2024 PIT Count for Yakima County.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.
Unsheltered Homeless refers to the segment of a homeless community who do not have ordinary lawful
access to buildings in which to sleep, as referred to in the HUD definition as persons occupying "place
not meant for human habitation", (examples: bus stop, parks, riverbed, van, RV, sidewalk).
Sheltered Homeless refers to those in an emergency shelter, in transitional housing, or whoaAAc are
exiting an institution where they temporarily reside lacking a fixed nighttime residence. People will be
considered homeless if they are exiting an institution where they resided for up to 90 days. People who
are losing their primary nighttime residence which may be a motel, hotel or a doubled up situation
within 14 days and lack resources or support networks to remain inaAAc housing, are also considered
homeless.
According to the 2024 Yakima County PIT Count report,there were:
• 143 individuals unsheltered
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 46
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
223
• 34 individuals in sanctioned encampments
• 300 individuals in emergency shelter.
The number of individuals experiencing homelessness who were surveyed decreased in 2024 by nearly
15%from 2023.The unsheltered population decreased by nearly 28%, compared to 2023.
According to the Yakima County dashboard, 18%of individuals exiting shelter during FY25 have had a
positive exist destination (i.e. permanent housing).
Discussion:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 47
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
224
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d)
Introduction:
Supportive housing is a nationally recognized, evidence-based approach to addressing some of the most
complex challenges facing communities today. It integrates affordable, permanent housing with access
to comprehensive, voluntary support services designed to promote stability, independence, and dignity
for individuals and families with the greatest needs. Residents of supportive housing benefit from
intensive case management and are connected to critical services such as healthcare, workforce
development, and child and family support. Unlike temporary housing solutions, supportive housing is
permanent and does not impose time limits on residency.aAAAAAc
Supportive housing improves:
• Housing stability
• Employment
• Mental and physical health
• School attendance
• Engagement with behavioral health services
There are several populations of residents that would benefit from supportive housing in the City of
Roanoke.These include elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with behavioral health needs,
or persons with HIV/AIDS and their families.aAAAAAz aAAAAAc
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:
Elderly Persons information below covers the population of persons in Yakima aged 65 years or older,
who make up 16%of the population. Additionally:aAAAAc
• 50%of persons aged 65 years or older are living aloneaAAAAc
• 41%have a reported disabilityaAAAAc
• Are more likely to be homeowners (versus renters)
• 87%receive social security incomeaAAAAc
Elderly households have housing needs centered on maintaining affordable housing options. Many
residents in this category also benefit from accessibility upgrades in their homes.
Persons with Disability
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 48
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
225
Federal nondiscrimination laws define a person with a disability to include any(1) individual with a
physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) individual
with a record of such impairment; or(3) individual who is regarded as having such an impairment.
In Yakima, 16.8%of the population has a disability:
• 5.4%with a hearing difficulty
• 2.9%with a vision difficulty
• 7.3%with a cognitive difficulty
• 9.1%with an ambulatory difficulty
• 3.6%with a self-care difficulty
• 7.5%with an independent living difficultyaAAAAc
Persons with behavioral health needs often require a holistic approach to support their well-being, as
their challenges extend beyond mental health care alone. Access to behavioral health services, including
therapy, medication management, and crisis intervention, is crucial for stability, yet many face barriers
such as provider shortages, long wait times, and high costs. Reliable transportation is essential to
ensuring they can attend medical appointments,therapy sessions, and access community resources.
Stable and affordable housing is another critical need, as housing insecurity can exacerbate mental
health conditions and make it difficult to adhere to treatment plans. In Roanoke, a new service is
available to women with high-risk pregnancies who are struggling with substance use.The Grove on
Patterson will serve as a housing facility and treatment center. One key feature of this program will be
keeping parents together with their children during treatment.aAAAAc
Additionally, access to nutritious food plays a significant role in overall health and well-being, as poor
nutrition can contribute to mood disorders and other physical health issues. Comprehensive support
systems, including case management and peer support, are vital in helping individuals with behavioral
health needs maintain stability and improve their quality of Iife.aAAAAc
Persons Living with HIV/AIDS- SEE DESCRIPTION BELOW
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these
needs determined?
The non-homeless special needs populations in the City of Yakima have a wide range of service needs,
including transitional housing, supportive housing, accessible housing, counseling, case management,
transportation to healthcare facilities, and low barrier access to behavioral health services. All special
needs populations require individualized consideration. While many persons within the special needs
population do not rely on governmental assistance, some do.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 49
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
226
Extensive engagement with these target populations and service providers was conducted to gain better
understanding of these needs. Community surveys were administered to gain direct input from these
populations. Engagement at key community events allowed for direct, personal feedback on needs.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within
the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area:
According to Washington State's 2024 HIV Surveillance report,there were 17 new cases in 2023, up
from 9 new cases in 2022. Of these,4 were a late HIV diagnosis and 14 received initial linkage to HIV
care.There are 290 prevalent cases of HIV in Yakima County and 92%of cases are engaged in care.
If the PJ will establish a preference for a HOME TBRA activity for persons with a specific
category of disabilities (e.g., persons with HIV/AIDS or chronic mental illness), describe their
unmet need for housing and services needed to narrow the gap in benefits and services
received by such persons. (See 24 CFR 92.209(c)(2) (ii))
Discussion:
Non-homeless special needs populations, including the elderly, individuals with disabilities,those living
with HIV/AIDS, and those with behavioral health needs, require a range of supportive services to
maintain stability and quality of life.The elderly often need assistance with daily living activities,
healthcare access,transportation, and social engagement to prevent isolation. Individuals with
disabilities may require accessible housing, specialized healthcare, employment support, and mobility
assistance.Those living with HIV/AIDS benefit from medical care, case management, access to nutritious
food, and supportive housing to ensure treatment adherence and overall well-being. Individuals with
behavioral health needs require access to mental health services, stable housing, reliable transportation,
and social supports to promote recovery and independence. Coordinated social services and
community-based programs as well as low-barrier access to services that can address acute needs are
critical to addressing these diverse needs.The City will work towards addressing these needs by
targeting future funding towards public service opportunities.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 50
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
227
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 Overview
Housing Market Analysis Overview:
The Market Analysis aims to provide a clear picture of the environment in which the jurisdiction must
administer its programs throughout the Consolidated Plan period. In conjunction with the Needs
Assessment,the Market Analysis will provide the basis for the Strategic Plan and the programs and
projects to be administered.
The Housing Market Analysis provides information on:
• Significant characteristics of Yakima's housing market in general, including the supply, demand,
condition, and cost of housing
• Housing stock available to serve persons with disabilities and other special needs
• Condition and need of public and assisted housing
• A brief inventory of facilities, housing, and services to meet the needs of homeless persons
• Regulatory barriers to affordable housing
• Significant characteristics of the jurisdiction's economy
The City of Yakima is the "Heart of Central Washington," bounded by the Yakima River to the east and
rolling orchards in west valley, serving as a center of the Yakima Valley's agricultural prosperity for
over125 years, and growing into a dynamic cultural, recreational, and economic hub of the region. With
a population of 93,830 (2016-2020 ACS)the City of Yakima is the eleventh largest city in the State of
Washington. However, despite this status Yakima still retains its rural character due to a strong
agricultural base and a vibrant natural setting.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 51
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
228
MA-10 Number of Housing Units — 91.210(a)&(b)(2)
Introduction
The United States needs more housing and more varied housing to meet households' needs throughout
the country. Some economists estimate that one consequence of the 2008 foreclosure crisis was the
slow rebound in home construction while household growth continued, resulting in the
underproduction of housing by more than 3 million units.
Although home production has recently been on the rise, building permits, one indicator of new housing
supply, remain below historical averages and far below the level needed to eliminate the deficit in
housing.
The consequences of inadequate supply are higher housing costs for renting or buying a home. More
than 37 million renter and owner households spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing in
2019. In the years prior to the pandemic, low-interest rates for mortgage loans and increasing incomes,
not lower home values, had reduced owner cost burden. For renters, increasing incomes were matched
by rising rents, maintaining cost burdens despite a strong economy.
"Opportunities to Increase Housing Production and Preservation"HUD PD&R, September 7, 2021
According to the 2016-2020 ACS data summarized below,there are an estimated 24,904 total housing
units, which is a slight increase of 254 units from the 2011-2015 ACS data from the previous
Consolidated Plan.There are 22,954 occupied housing units (13,785 owner-occupied and 9,345 renter-
occupied).The total number of vacant housing units is calculated at 1,950, which represents 7.8%of the
total housing in the City.aAAAAAAc
As shown in Table 31, single unit, detached dwellings (21,810) comprise 61%of the City's total housing
inventory, while apartment buildings containing 2-4 dwelling units make up 13%of the City's housing
stock.
ACS data reports that 74%of owner-occupied dwelling units in Yakima are 3-bedroom or larger and only
3%are one-or no-bedroom units. In contrast, renter-housing is predominately 2-bedroom units at 38%,
with 3 or more bedroom units being 28%, and one-bedroom or no bedroom units 33%of the rental
units.AAAAAAAC Considering the household compositions and the vacancy rates, it will be important
for the City to ensure the "right-size" affordable housing is developed.The need for larger units may be
declining.
All residential properties by number of units
Property Type Number
1-unit detached structure 21,810 61%
1-unit, attached structure 1,905 5%
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 52
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
229
Property Type Number %
2-4 units 4,650 13%
5-19 units 2,490 7%
20 or more units 2,660 7%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc 2,240 6%
Total 35,755 100%
Table 23—Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Unit Size by Tenure
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 85 0% 1,750 11%
1 bedroom 490 3% 3,350 22%
2 bedrooms 4,125 22% 5,905 38%
3 or more bedrooms 13,715 74% 4,335 28%
Total 18,415 99% 15,340 99%
Table 24—Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with
federal, state, and local programs.
HUD programs provide assistance in three categories: public housing,tenant-based, and multifamily
assisted or privately owned, project-based housing. Public housing is a form of project-based subsidy
because households may receive assistance only if they agree to live at a particular public housing
project. In public housing, local housing agencies receive allocations of HUD funding to build, operate, or
improve housing.The local agencies own the housing. In Yakima,there are no public housing options.
The Yakima Housing Authority,through the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program,
converted all public housing to Housing Choice Vouchers(HCVs).YHA administers 1,313 vouchers. An
overview of units and populations served can be found on YHA's website:YHA Services-Yakima
Housing Authority
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for
any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 53
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
230
The current availability of housing units does not meet the demand of low-to moderate-income renters
and homeowners. Renters are uniquely impacted by the rising value of single-family homes and
property lots. Landowners of single-family rentals are more likely to sell their rental investment property
as housing values continue to rise,further reducing the number of available rental houses.
Additionally, as housing prices increase, it becomes increasingly difficult for middle to moderate-income
renters to transition to homeownership due to the higher monthly mortgage costs and downpayment
requirements. It can be extremely challenging for extremely low to low-income renters to "compete"for
a limited amount of rental housing.To mitigate this competition,the state of Washington includes
protections against discrimination based on "source of income" under its fair housing laws.
Washington's Residential Landlord-Tenant Act was amended in 2018 to prohibit discrimination based on
a tenant's source of income, which means landlords cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because
they receive rental assistance, social security, or other public benefits as part of their income.
Washington's law also requires that if a landlord has specific income standards (such as income-to-rent
ratios),they must consider a tenant's subsidy or voucher as part of the income calculation. Additionally,
the law created a mitigation fund to help landlords cover any damage beyond normal wear and tear,
making it more appealing for landlords to accept tenants using housing vouchers or subsidies. However,
there are still considerable challenges that impact enforcement and housing availability for low-and
extremely low-income households. Even with anti-discrimination protections,there is a shortage of
affordable housing units for low-income households. Some landlords may still try to circumvent source
of income protections through subtle tactics, such as imposing strict screening criteria unrelated to
income. For example, higher credit score requirements, background checks, and extensive rental history
reviews can still prevent low-income applicants from securing housing, even when they have a voucher
or other assistance. Additionally, enforcement can be challenging and tenants may be reluctant to
report discrimination due to fear of retaliation or fear of losing the limited housing options available to
them.
Describe the need for specific types of housing:
The City of Yakima needs affordable housing units that ensure that low-to moderate-income
residents spend no more than 30%of their monthly income on housing expenses. aAACWhile there is
a monumental amount of new housing units in the community, it does not meet the financial needs of
the community's residents most vulnerable to housing instability.
It is critical to understand how the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) evaluates
income within a community. aAAz HUD sets income limits that determine eligibility for assisted housing
programs, including the Public Housing, Section 8 project-based, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher,
Section 202 housing for the elderly, and Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities. aAAz HUD
develops income limits based on Median Family Income estimates and Fair Market Rent area definitions
for each metropolitan area, parts of some metropolitan areas, and each non-metropolitan county.
aAAz The City of Yakima falls within the Yakima, WA MSA FMR Area.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 54
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
231
A family in Yakima is considered low-to moderate-income if they make
• $51,300 as a single-person household
• $60,700 as a two-person household
• $68,300 as a three-person household
• $75,850 as a four-person household
• $81,950 as a five-person household
• $88,000 as a six-person household
Most residents in Yakima either have a close family member or have had an annual income qualifying
them as low-to moderate-income. aAAz Residents who fall within these income categories may have
unique difficulties.There is also a lack of"accessible" housing units in the City to address the needs of
the physically disabled.
Discussion
There is a continuing need for"affordable" and "accessible" housing in the City of Yakima. Much of the
existing housing is sound and there appears to be an adequate supply of market-rate housing. However,
housing opportunities are lacking for the lower income renters and homebuyers in the City.aAz Low-
income homeowners with high housing cost burdens need housing rehabilitation programs to bring
their dwellings up to code standards, make them energy efficient and help them reduce their cost
burdens. Low-income renters with housing problems, including high housing cost burdens, need access
to quality affordable rental housing.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 55
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
232
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a)
Introduction
The data presented in this section indicates that, within the City of Yakima,there is a diverse mix of
housing in different price ranges for owner-occupied and rental dwelling units. However, conclusions
about the availability of affordable housing for low-and moderate-income households need to take into
account additional factors such as the age and condition of this housing and the neighborhoods in which
such housing is located. Housing needs to be both affordable and good quality and located within safe,
stable residential neighborhoods.
The median home value increased nearly 16%between the 2011-2015 ACS data, $157,700, and the
2016-2020 ACS data, $182,900. The median contract rent (using the same sources) increased 14%from
$632/month to$721/month.AAAAAAAc Of the total number of occupied rental units, nearly 62%
(9,440) were in the$500 to $999 category per month. An important consideration when estimating
rental rates is the differing practices regarding the inclusion of utilities and fuels in rental payments.
Gross rent accounts for these variations by combining the contract rent with the estimated average
monthly cost of utilities (such as electricity, gas, and water/sewer) and fuels (including oil, coal,
kerosene, wood, etc.), if they are paid by the renter or on the renter's behalf.This approach ensures
consistency by eliminating discrepancies related to the inclusion of these additional costs.
Cost of Housing
Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2020 %Change
Median Home Value 156,700 182,900 17%
Median Contract Rent 632 721 14%
Table 25—Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2000 Census(Base Year),2016-2020 ACS(Most Recent Year)
Rent Paid Number
Less than $500 2,900 18.9%
$500-999 9,440 61.6%
$1,000-1,499 2,400 15.7%
$1,500-1,999 440 2.9%
$2,000 or more 165 1.1%
Total 15,345 100.10/0
Table 26-Rent Paid
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 56
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
233
Housing Affordability
Number of Units affordable to Renter Owner
Households earning
30% HAMFI 635 No Data
50% HAMFI 3,700 1,065
80% HAMFI 9,675 5,145
100% HAMFI No Data 7,360
Total 14,010 13,570
Table 27—Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Homeowner Housing Stability
The Federal Finance Housing Agency- FHFA House Price Index(FHFA HPI®) is a broad measure of the
movement of single-family house prices.The FHFA HPI is a weighted, repeat-sales index, meaning that it
measures average price changes in repeat sales or refinancings on the same properties.This information
is obtained by reviewing repeat mortgage transactions on single-family properties whose mortgages
have been purchased or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac since January 1975.The FHFA HPI
serves as a timely, accurate indicator of house price trends at various geographic levels. Because of the
breadth of the sample, it provides more information than is available in other house price indexes. It
also provides housing economists with an improved analytical tool that is useful for estimating changes
in the rates of mortgage defaults, prepayments, and housing affordability in specific geographic areas.
The population of Yakima is largely stagnant with little increase in wages.The FHFA HPI Calculator is
available on the FHFA website and provides data on the increase of house prices in Yakima measured
quarterly.A quick calculation for a home purchased in 2023 Quarter 1 for$182,900 and sold in 2024
Quarter 2 would have an appreciation of 9.8%and have an estimated value of$200,984. Continued
housing cost increases will result in households that cannot maintain the aging housing stock, reduce
the ability of renters to transition to homeownership, and cause the existing residents to be unable to
purchase homes inside the City.
Monthly Rent
Monthly Rent($) Efficiency(no 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom
bedroom)
Fair Market Rent 858 864 1,137 1,616 1,698
High HOME Rent 556 637 837 1,065 1,169
Low HOME Rent 556 609 731 845 942
Table 28—Monthly Rent
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 57
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
234
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?
The lack of affordable housing impacts low-and moderate-income residents the greatestaAAAAAC The
steadily increasing rent costs compound the financial struggles that these families are at risk of
experiencing. Additionally,the growing need for new rental housing units and aged housing unit stock
results in many renters living in substandard housing conditions.
AFFORDABLE, BUT NOT AVAILABLE
Homes that are affordable to extremely low-income renters are not necessarily available to them. In the
private market, households can occupy homes that cost less than 30%of their incomes, and many do.
When higher-income households occupy rental homes also affordable to lower-income households,
they render those homes unavailable to the lower-income households. Extremely low-income renters
must compete with all higher-income households for the limited number of rental homes affordable to
them in the private market.To truly measure the housing options extremely low-income renters have,
we must account for the fact that higher-income renters occupy some of the most affordable units.
Rental homes are both affordable and available for households of a specific income group if the homes
are affordable to them and they are not occupied by higher-income households.
EXTREMELY LOW-INCOME RENTERS
The vast majority of extremely low-income renters work in low-wage jobs or are unable to work. With
wages insufficient to pay for modest rental housing even when individuals work full-time year-round, a
brief furlough or loss of hours, as we have seen over the past year, can create debts that renters can
never repay. Extremely low-income renters in the labor force, many already struggling to pay their rents
before the pandemic, were significantly impacted by COVID-19.aAAAAAz AAAAAAz Low-wage work
comprised a disproportionate share of industries most affected by COVID-19 shutdowns. Extremely low-
income renters were likely impacted by the closures of restaurants, hotels, and other places of low-
wage employment. The Gap,A Shortage of Affordable Homes,&AAAAA�-National Low Income Housing
Coalition, March 2021
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or
rents?
With a median home value of$182,900, it appears that Yakima's housing stock is "affordable" compared
to state and national averages (state: $605,400; national: $420,500).AAAAAz However, given a stagnant
population, current economic conditions, increase in the number of renters, and increase in rental rates,
a variety of housing "affordability" issues need to be addressed:
• Much of the affordable housing stock in Yakima is old and older houses are more expensive to
maintain and often need rehabilitation;
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 58
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
235
• LMI households in Yakima are shown to be cost burdened, and such households often have
difficulties obtaining housing that is both affordable for their situation and in decent condition;
and
• It is likely that rental rates will continue to increase.
Rental Housing Stability
As the economy improves, rental prices continue to increase.The trend over the past decade has been a
higher rental increase than the increase in monthly wages. As this trend continues, it puts more
significant financial pressure on low-and moderate-income families who are spending an ever-
increasing percentage of their income on housing costs.
As higher-income renters and distressed homeowners seek cheaper alternatives to their current
housing, competition for less expensive rental homes may actually increase. Meanwhile,few of the
lowest-income renters have the option of leaving the rental market altogether. Consequently, rents for
the least expensive homes may be less responsive to economic downturns, and in some cases,they
could even increase because of greater demand. Even if rents at the bottom-end of the market fall
during a downturn,they will not fall sufficiently to provide extremely low-income renters with
anaAAAAc adequate supply of affordable housing. Owners have an incentive to abandon their rental
properties or convert them to other uses when rental income is too low to cover basic operating costs
and maintenance.They have little incentive to provide housing in the private market at rents that are
affordable to extremely low-income renters. During periods of economic growth,the private market on
its own still does not provide an adequate supply of rental housing affordable to low-income
households.The rents that the lowest-income households can afford to pay typically do not cover the
development costs and operating expenses of new housing. While new construction for higher-income
renters encourages a chain of household moves that eventually benefits lower-income renters, new
luxury units may not impact rents at the bottom of the market as much as they do rents at the top. The
Gap,A Shortage of Affordable Homes, National Low Income Housing Coalition, March 2021
See attached for Homeowner Housing Stability discussion.
How do HOME rents/ Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this
impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
Since 1974 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has helped low-income
households obtain better rental housing and reduce the share of their income that goes toward rent
through a program that relies on the private rental market. A key parameter in operating the certificate
and voucher programs is the Fair Market Rent (FMR). FMRs play different roles in the certificate and
voucher programs. In both programs, FMRs set limits. In the certificate program, FMRs set limits on
what units can be rented; in the voucher program, FMRs set limits on the subsidy provided to the
household. Certificate program households cannot rent units with gross rents exceeding the FMR;the
recipients receive a subsidy equal to the difference between the gross rent and 30 percent of their
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 59
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
236
incomes.Voucher program households receive a subsidy equal to the difference between the FMR and
30 percent of their monthly incomes. Participants in the voucher program can choose units to live in
with gross rents higher than the FMR, but they must pay the full cost of the difference between the
gross rent and the FMR, plus 30 percent of their income. FMRs are intended to ensure that rental
assistance beneficiaries have access to safe, decent housing while balancing affordability with local
market conditions. HUD updates FMRs annually,taking into account local rent surveys, inflation, and
other economic factors. However,there is often a disconnect between market realities and funding
regulations undermines the ability of programs to assist those in need and reduces the overall impact
of rental assistance efforts.
According to HUD's 2024 Fair Market Rent data for the Yakima, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area,fair
market rent for an efficiency apartment is$990; $997 for a one-bedroom; $1,310 for a two-bedroom.
NOTE:FMR includes the cost of utilities;for a resident living in a one-bedroom unit, the FMR$913 is the
total cost for rent AND utilities for that unit. These monthly FMRs are below the High and Low HUD
HOME rent.aAAc
Discussion
The need is for the City to encourage the rehabilitation and preservation of existing rental housing to
ensure that these affordable units are also in good condition. New construction of affordable rental
housing may only be successful to the extent that the production of such units can be subsidized to
enable them to remain affordable and to the extent that existing rental housing is seen as substandard
and undesirable.aAz-aAz-aAz-
Quality Affordable Homes Critical to Good HealthaAz-aAz-
Ensuring enough affordable homes are available can lead to healthier families and communities. When
rents are high,families prioritize rent and utilities over food and health care, even when serious health
conditions are part of the picture. Stable, safe, and well-maintained housing can also decrease exposure
to environmental hazards like mold, lead, or pests,which are linked to chronic illnesses. Additionally,
housing stability helps individuals maintain consistent access to healthcare providers and medications,
leading to improved overall well-being and fewer emergency interventions.aAc
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 60
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
237
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing — 91.210(a)
Introduction
Housing is a major element of people's material living standards. It is essential to meet basic needs, such
as for shelter from weather conditions and to offer a sense of personal security, privacy, and personal
space. Good housing conditions are also essential for people's health and affect childhood
development.
Housing is the key to reducing intergenerational poverty and increasing economic mobility. Research
shows that increasing access to affordable housing is the most cost-effective strategy for reducing
childhood poverty and increasing economic mobility in the United States. Stanford economist Raj Chetty
found that children who moved to lower-poverty neighborhoods saw their earnings as adults increase
by approximately 31%, an increased likelihood of living in better neighborhoods as adults, and a lowered
likelihood of becoming a single parent. Moreover, children living in stable, affordable homes are more
likely to thrive in school and have greater opportunities to learn inside and outside the classroom.
Increasing access to affordable housing bolsters economic growth. Research shows that the shortage of
affordable housing costs the American economy about$2 trillion a year in lower wages and productivity.
Without affordable housing,families have constrained opportunities to increase earnings, causing
slower GDP growth. In fact, researchers estimate that the growth in GDP between 1964 and 2009 would
have been 13.5%higher if families had better access to affordable housing.This would have led to a $1.7
trillion increase in income or$8,775 in additional wages per worker. Moreover, each dollar invested in
affordable housing boosts local economies by leveraging public and private resources to generate
income—including resident earnings and additional local tax revenue—and supports job creation and
retention. "The Problem,"aAAAAc National Low Income Housing Alliance
Describe the jurisdiction's definition of"standard condition" and "substandard condition but
suitable for rehabilitation":
For this Consolidated Plan,the City of Yakima will use the HUD housing quality standards as defined
below:
1.aAAAAAz Standard Condition. A unit of housing is considered to be in standard condition if it is
generally in good repair, with no substandard habitability elements (i.e., lacking complete plumbing or
kitchen facilities) or exterior elements. Such units may be eligible for housing rehabilitation funding if
interior conditions are such that the HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards are not met, or a threat
to the integrity or livability of the unit exists and should be addressed. Examples of ways in which the
interiors of such homes might be rehabilitated include the replacement of heating systems, electrical
system repairs or upgrades, plumbing system repairs or upgrades, energy efficiency improvements, and
accessibility improvements.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 61
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
238
2.aAAAAAz-Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehabilitation.aAAAAAz-This category describes
dwelling units that do not meet one or more of the HUD Section 8 quality standard conditions, likely due
to deferred maintenance or work without permits, but that is both financially and structurally feasible
for rehabilitation. Such units may be lacking complete plumbing and kitchen facilities and/or may have
exterior elements in need of repair (e.g., a roof in need of replacement, siding in need of repair or
replacement, missing or failing foundation). In order to be suitable for rehabilitation,the unit value
generally exceeds the cost of repairs or upgrades that would be required to bring it to standard
condition.This category of property does not include units that need correction or minor livability
problems or maintenance work.
3.aAAAAACSubstandard Condition and Not Suitable for Rehabilitation.aAAAAAz-This category
describes dwelling units in such poor conditions as to be neither structurally nor financially feasible
foraAAAAAc rehabilitation. Such units will typically have an improvement value that is less than the cost
of addressing the habitability and exterior elements that cause its classification as "substandard" or will
be considered unfit to occupy for safety reasons by the city's building official.
The table below displays the number of housing units, by tenure, based on the number of"conditions"
the unit has.aAAAAAc Selected conditions are similar to housing problems in the Needs Assessment: are
(1) lacks complete plumbing facilities, (2) lacks complete kitchen facilities, (3) more than one person per
room, and (4) cost burden greater than 30%.
Condition of Units
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number
With one selected Condition 4,485 24% 6,915 45%
With two selected Conditions 145 1% 1,330 9%
With three selected Conditions 0 0% 30 0%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 13,785 75% 7,065 46%
Total 18,415 100% 15,340 100%
Table 29-Condition of Units
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Year Unit Built
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number
2000 or later 2,040 11% 2,340 15%
1980-1999 3,110 17% 3,510 23%
1950-1979 7,895 43% 6,310 41%
Before 1950 5,365 29% 3,185 21%
Total 18,410 100% 15,345 100%
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 62
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
239
Table 30—Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 13,260 72% 9,495 62%
Housing Units build before 1980 with children present 2,195 12% 740 5%
Table 31—Risk of Lead-Based Paint
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS(Total Units)2016-2020 CHAS(Units with Children present)
Vacant Units
Suitable for Not Suitable for Total
Rehabilitation Rehabilitation
Vacant Units 0 0 0
Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0
REO Properties 0 0 0
Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0
Table 32-Vacant Units
Data Source: 2005-2009 CHAS
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
<TYPE=[text] REPORT_GUID=[F8DC4D3147433947165558A235C46686]
PLAN_SECTION_I D=[1313801000]>
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low or Moderate Income Families with LBP
Hazards
Environmental lead is a toxic substance affecting the growth and development of up to one million U.S.
preschool children today,with effects ranging from learning disabilities to death. High lead levels can
cause many health problems by damaging the brain, nervous system, and kidneys. Lead poisoning can
cause decreased intelligence, behavioral and speech problems, anemia, decreased muscle and bone
growth, poor muscle coordination, and hearing damage. Lead exposures remain prevalent despite
considerable knowledge and increased screening and intervention efforts.
Increased lead exposure and increased body burden of lead remain a significant problem for children in
the United States. Lead is an environmental toxicant that may cause adverse health effects to the
nervous, hematopoietic, endocrine, renal, and reproductive systems. Lead exposure in young children is
particularly hazardous because children absorb lead more readily than adults. Many children exposed to
lead do not exhibit any signs of the disease.The child's signs or symptoms could be mistaken for other
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 63
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
240
illnesses, and the child goes undiagnosed.The developing nervous system of children is particularly
more susceptible to the effects of lead.The underdeveloped blood-brain barrier in young children
increasesaAAz theaAAz riskaAAz ofaAAz IeadaAAz entering the developing
nervousaAAz systemaAAz resultingaAAz in neurobehavioralaAAzdisorders. Blood lead levels (BLLs) at
any detectable level have been shown to cause behavioral and developmental disorders;
therefore,aAAz-no safe blood lead level in children has been identified.aAACIt is increasingly
important for continued childhood lead poisoning prevention education andaAAc awareness.
Lead-contaminated water, soil, and paint have been recognized as potential sources of children's lead
exposure.aAAz-Dust from deteriorating lead-based paint is considered the largest contributor to the
lead problem.aAACUntil the 1950s, many homes were covered inside and out with leaded paints. Lead
began to fall from favor in the 1950s but was still commonly used until it was banned in homes after
1977.
Because of the long-term use of lead-based paints, many homes in the United States contain surfaces
with paint that is now peeling, chalking,flaking, or wearing away.The dust or paint chips contain high
levels of lead that easily find ways into the mouths of young children. A particular problem has emerged
due to many homes with lead-based paints,which are now undergoing renovations. Often the dust
created by this work has high lead levels, which are readily absorbed by the children's developing
bodies.
Yakima has a sizable amount of housing built before 1980 that has the potential to be hazardous to
children. aAAz-The 2016-2020 CHAS estimates that 22,755 units were built prior to 1980;
approximately 2,935 of these units have children present. It's important to note the number of
unreported/undetected cases of childhood lead poisoning is unknown, and the low number of reported
cases should not be misconstrued as evidence that lead poisoning is not more widespread.
Discussion
The high percentage of older units(built before 1980) in both owner and rental stock suggests a strong
need for rehabilitation due to aging infrastructure, outdated systems (plumbing, electrical, HVAC), and
potential health hazards (lead paint, asbestos, etc.). Housing rehabilitation funds should prioritize
homes built before 1980, with special attention to pre-1950 homes, which are at higher risk of structural
deterioration and environmental hazards. Some program considerations would be providing incentives
or grants for repairs to improve rental properties. For homeowners, providing low-interest rehabilitation
loans or grant will help maintain housing stability.aAz aAz aAc
Given the age of homes in the City,the risk of lead exposure remains a concern, particularly for young
children who are most vulnerable to its harmful effects. Additionally,the true extent of childhood lead
poisoning in Yakima is uncertain, as unreported or undetected cases may contribute to a more
widespread issue than current data suggests.Therefore, efforts to assess and mitigate lead hazards in
older housing should remain a priority for public health and housing initiatives.aACAAc
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 64
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
241
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 65
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
242
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing — 91.210(b)
Introduction
YHA only administers Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV's);YHA does not operate public housing. According to YHA's 2024 Annual Plan,YHA
currently administers 1,312 HCV's.The plan targets households with income under 50%of MFI, expanding housing opportunities with areas
outside of poverty and minority concentrations.YHA currently has a "high" performance rating in the Section Eight Management Assessment
Program (SEMAP). SEMAP measures the performance of the public housing agencies (PHAs)that administer the Housing Choice Voucher
program in 14 key areas. SEMAP helps HUD target monitoring and assistance to PHA programs that need the most improvement.
YHA's progress on meeting its mission and goals described in its 5-year PHA Plan:
Continue to maintain a "high performance rating in SEMAP-The Housing Authority currently has a "high" performance rating in SEMAP.
Maintain a leasing or authorized budget authority utilization rate of not less than 98%for Section 8-The Housing Authority's Section 8
utilization for calendar year 2023 is 104.61%.
Increase Section 8 vouchers through requests for incremental and/or special needs vouchers-YHA received an award of JO additional Stability
vouchers in coordination with the Balance of State Continuum of Care.
Grow the home ownership program, utilizing Section 8 vouchers,for not less than 10 families-The Housing Authority has developed a home
ownership program and is working in connection with development to create home ownership opportunities for its residents.
Continue to house homeless through 100 project-based vouchers with our community partners -The Housing Authority has set aside 100
project-based vouchers for housing homeless throughout Yakima County.
Continue to lease all remaining 93 VASH vouchers in connection with the Veteran's Affair Office-YHA has currently leased 72 VASH vouchers
and is working with the Veteran's Affair Office to lease the remaining vouchers.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 66
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
243
Lease the five Mainstream vouchers in coordination with the Spokane Housing Authority-YHA currently is administering 115 mainstream
vouchers and the Spokane Housing Authority ported the remaining mainstream vouchers it administered in coordination with the Yakima
Housing Authority.
Work with our community partners to establish the Foster Youth Initiative-YHA created an MOU with its community partners and has
currently housed five youth and is in the process of requesting and issuing and additional five vouchers.
Preserve the Family Self-Sufficiency program for at least 125 families on Section 8-YHA currently has 115 families enrolled in the program.
Establish Supportive Employment to augment the Family Self-Sufficiency program -YHA established supportive employment and currently has
15 individuals enrolled in the program.
Maintain compliance with all applicable program requirements-YHA received a repeat finding during the most recent audit for FY2022.The
finding was related to understated assets, liabilities, and expenses as a result of a new development (a component unit of the Housing
Authority). In addition,the YHA received a finding for understating the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). However,YHA
outlined in its Corrective Action Plan that it has relied on outsourced fee accountants for proper recording of all development activities,financial
statement and SEFA preparation, and reporting.YHA will establish a review process by an employee who understands Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles and the Uniform Guidance to ensure accurate preparation and reporting of the financial statements total Federal awards
expended.
Totals Number of Units
Program Type
Certificate Mod-Rehab Public Vouchers
Housing Total Project-based Tenant-based Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans Family Disabled
Affairs Unification
Supportive Program
Housing
#of units vouchers
available 0 0 150 688 49 639 197 0 0
#of accessible units
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 67
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
244
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year,and Nursing Home Transition
Table 33—Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC(PIH Information Center)
Describe the supply of public housing developments:
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an
approved Public Housing Agency Plan:
Yakima Housing Authority(YHA) has been designated as a "high performer" and reports the following in regards to physical conditions of public
housing units:aAAAc Despite having an older housing stock,aAAAc all of the public housing developments are in good condition and consistently
score well on inspections, including high marks under the NSPIRE standards.The buildings are fully up to code, and they are not experiencing
chronic vacancies.Any vacancies that do occur are the result of normal unit turnover rather than issues with unit quality or demand.pAAAe-
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 68
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
245
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score
Table 34-Public Housing Condition
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low-
and moderate-income families residing in public housing:
YHA offers several resident services to improve the living environment of residents:
• Family Self-Sufficiency Program:This program helps residents increase their skill levels,
education, and employment,to become self-supporting.The FSS Program is open to
households, with or without children.aAAz-
• Family Fun Night Community Resource Fair:This free community event will features dozens of
vendors, providing an array of offerings from local community organizations and service
providers.aAAz-
• Sharon Wandler Scholarship:Three scholarships will be awarded to candidates pursuing their
first degree. One scholarship, which will be awarded to a returning college attendee, and two
scholarships for High School Graduates or GED holder.aAAz-aAAz-
• Moving to Work: Helps YHA to maximize the number of households served through the voucher
program and making changes to the voucher program to make it more efficient to operate,
more likely to increase the self-sufficiency, and housing choice as well as the required activities
related to landlord incentives.aAAz-aAAz-aAAz-
Discussion:
New Activities:
• The Housing Authority intends to award up to 49 project-based vouchers for new construction
within the City of Yakima.The proposal will be awarded based on its consistency with the HUD
statutory goals of de-concentration of poverty and expanding housing and economic
opportunities and the Housing Authority's priorities to support housing for homeless individuals,
housing which provides supportive services to their residents and housing located in the City of
Yakima that serves to expand housing and economic activities.
• Move to Work(MTW) participation that will reduce cost and achieve greater cost effectiveness
and give incentives to families with children whose heads of household are either working,
seeking work, or participating in job training, education or other programs that assist in
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 69
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
246
obtaining employment.YHA aims to reduce the cost to administer the voucher program but
getting rid or simplifying regulations and processes that are overly complicated and confusing to
landlords, participants, and staff. Additionally,YHA will establish policies and provide resources
that will enable stability and increase self-sufficiently. Lastly,YHA will explore changes that will
increase landlord participation as well as policies that will all the voucher participants more
choice. Detailed descriptions of the MTW activities can be found in YHA's 2024 Annual Plan:
https://yakimahousing.org/about/
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 70
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
247
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services — 91.210(c)
Introduction
Affordable housing has become increasingly difficult to secure as rent rates continue to rise and rental vacancy rates reach virtually zero.
Additionally,the COVID-19 pandemic triggered job loss and reduced wages,further adding to the housing instability of thousands of households
throughout Idaho. Ultimately, homelessness is often the end result and does not happen by choice.
Homelessness stems from a variety of factors:
• Unemployment,
• Unforeseen life changes,
• Substance use,
• Medical emergencies,
• Domestic violence, or
• Mental health issues.
Housing instability is particularly challenging due to the limiting wage opportunity and other financial barriers. Nonprofits, community
organizations, and response networks throughout Idaho continue to increase capacity, become more sophisticated, and collaborate in their
efforts to provide housing and critical support services for the most disadvantaged among us.
Often it is easy to see homelessness simply as someone living on the street. While this is the reality for some, it is not for the majority of those
experiencing homelessness.The list below outlines the various definitions of homelessness,which often impact an individual's eligibility for
services.
Imminent Risk of Homelessness:A person or family who will lose their primary nighttime residence within 14 days.
Precariously Housed/at-risk of homelessness: A person or family who lack a fixed, regular nighttime residence or is being asked to leave their
current living situation.This person likely has an income at or below 30%AMI and insufficient resources or support networks.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 71
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
248
Fleeing/Attempting to Flee Domestic Violence: A person or family that is fleeing or is attempting to flee domestic violence, has no other
residence, lacks resources or support networks, or does not have permanent housing.
Literally Homeless:A person or a family who lacks a fixed, regular and adequate nighttime residence.Typically,this means living in a place not
meant for habitation or in an emergency shelter.
Chronically Homeless:A person or family who has experienced homelessness for at least 12 months consecutively or had 4 episodes of
homelessness in the last 3 years (episodes that total 12 months or more)—while having a disabling condition.
Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional Permanent Supportive Housing
Housing Beds Beds
Year Round Beds Voucher/ Current& New Current& New Under
(Current& New) Seasonal/ Development
Overflow Beds
Households with Adult(s) and
Child(ren) 0 0 0 0 0
Households with Only Adults 0 0 0 0 0
Chronically Homeless Households 0 0 0 0 0
Veterans 0 0 0 0 0
Unaccompanied Youth 0 0 0 0 0
Table 35-Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Data Source Comments:
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 72
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
249
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the
extent those services are use to complement services targeted to homeless persons
Within the City of Yakima,there is a focus on connecting homeless persons to the mainstream services,
such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to
complement services targeted to homeless persons.Yakima has a variety of providers that work to
support homelessness services, some of which are delivered by local governments and some by regional
non-profits. Below are some key service providers, although this is not an exhaustive Iist:aAACAAAc
Health Services:aAACaAACaAAC
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services—provides comprehensive medical, dental, behavioral health, and
social service support.YNHS is also a coordinated entry access point and provides permanent supportive
housing and medical respite care for literally homeless individuals and families.
Yakima Lions Club—provides medical equipment
Triumph Treatment Services—provides outpatient and residential substance use disorder and mental
health treatment
Domestic Violence Services:aAACaAACaAAC
YWCA—provides emergency shelter,transitional housing, permanent housing, and legal services for
victims and survivors of violence
Aspen Victim Advocacy Services-advocacy, counseling, resource referrals for victims and survivors of
violence
Food Services:aAACaAACaAAC
Several pantries are available including:Yakima Food Pantry, Rotary Food Bank, Fruitvale Community
Market, and Yakima Seventh Day Adventist Food Bank
Union Gospel Mission provides the Good News Café, offering free meals to community members
Employment Services:aAACaAAC
Worksource Yakima, South County Workforce, and OIC offer workforce development services, including
connecting job seekers to employment and business to job seekers.
Salvation Army's Pathways to Hope also provides employment services to individuals with barriers to
employment.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 73
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
250
List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly
chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children, veterans and their
families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40
Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services,
describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.
Many of the services list above are inclusive to people experiencing homelessness. Facilities include, but
are not limited to:aAz aAz aAz-
Emergency Shelter,for individuals and families experiencing homelessness and need an immediate
place to stay:aAc
• Union Gospel Mission -offers adult shelter beds and family shelter beds
• YWCA DV Shelter—provides emergency shelter to individuals/families fleeing domestic
violenceaAz aAz aAz-
Tenant Based Rental Assistance:aAz-
• YHA-The Housing Authority received housing choice vouchers for individuals/families
experiencing homelessness.aAz aAc
Permanent Supportive Housing:aAz aAc
• YHA provides permanent supportive housing for veterans (VASH)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 74
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
251
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services — 91.210(d)
Introduction
Everyone needs safe, decent, stable housing. aAAACFor some of the most vulnerable people in
America — people with mental illness, chronic health conditions, histories of trauma, and other
struggles — a home helps them to get adequate treatment and start on the path toward recovery.
aAAAz But some conditions make it difficult for people to maintain a stable home without additional
help. aAAAc Supportive housing, a highly effective strategy that combines affordable housing with
intensive coordinated services, can provide that needed assistance.
A broad body of research shows that supportive housing effectively helps people with disabilities
maintain stable housing. aAAAz People in supportive housing use costly systems like emergency health
services less frequently and are less likely to be incarcerated. aAAAc Supportive housing also can aid
people with disabilities in getting better health care and help seniors trying to stay in the community as
they age and families trying to keep their children out of foster care.
Supportive housing is a highly effective strategy thataAAAz combines affordable housing with intensive
coordinated servicesaAAAz-to help people struggling with chronic physical and mental health issues
maintain stable housing and receive appropriate health care.
Permanence and affordability. aAAACTenants generally pay no more than 30 percent of their income
for rent. aAAAc They have the same rights and responsibilities as other renters, such as having the lease
in their name and the right to privacy in their unit, which means they cannot be evicted for reasons
unrelated to being a good tenant.
Integration. aAAACIndividuals and families are able to live independently in apartments or single-
family homes in residential neighborhoods. aAAAc Tenants in supportive housing should have access to
public transportation, grocery stores, parks, and other neighborhood amenities common to all other
residents. aAAAz (Less accessible services put tenants' housing and health at risk: if they are unable to
travel to providers' offices,for instance,they may stop using the services.)
Emphasis on choice. aAAACSupportive housing maximizes client choice, in clients' housing options and
the services they receive. aAAAz For instance,tenants can generally come and go as they please and
have control over their daily schedule, like mealtimes and visitors. aAAAc They also can direct the types
of services they receive and the goals they set with the service provider.
Low barriers to entry. aAAACSupportive housing providers do not require clients to hit benchmarks
before moving into housing or put other screening barriers in the way. aAAAz Blanket bans on people
with criminal histories or bad credit,for example, or requirements to meet goals, like employment or
completing a course of treatment, before entering supportive housing would screen out the very people
supportive housing aims to help. aAAACIndividuals and families are able to live independently in
apartments or single-family homes in residential neighborhoods.aAAAc "Supportive Housing Helps
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 75
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
252
Vulnerable People Live and Thrive in the Community"aAAAz Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, May
31, 2016
Including the elderly,frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental),
persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families,
public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe
their supportive housing needs
Elderly and Frail Elderly. Supportive housing needs may include health care coordination and
medication management, personal care assistance with daily activities such as bathing and dressing, and
access to nutritious home-delivered meals. Reliable transportation is essential for attending medical
appointments and running errands, while housekeeping and home maintenance support help ensure a
safe living environment. Many older adults also benefit from case management and assistance with
navigating benefits like Medicare or Social Security.To address social isolation and mental health
challenges, services such as counseling and recreational programs are critical, along with accessibility
modifications and emergency alert systems to support safety and mobility. Legal and financial guidance
can further assist seniors in managing their affairs, particularly those living on fixed
incomes.aAAz aAAc
Disability. Individuals with disabilities often require a variety of supportive services to promote
independence, stability, and overall well-being.These services may include assistance with daily living
activities such as bathing, dressing, and meal preparation, as well as care coordination to manage
complex medical needs and access to specialized healthcare. Accessible transportation is crucial for
attending appointments, securing employment, or participating in community life. Many also benefit
from case management to navigate public benefits like Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid, or
housing assistance. Mental health services, peer support, and recreational opportunities can help
reduce isolation and support emotional well-being. Home modifications such as wheelchair ramps,grab
bars, or adaptive technologies may be necessary to ensure safety and accessibility within the home.
Legal and financial advocacy may also be needed to protect rights and ensure long-term housing and
income stability.aAAz aAAc
Substance Use Disorders. Individuals with substance use disorders often require a range of supportive
services to achieve stability, recovery, and long-term well-being.These services may include access to
treatment programs such as outpatient counseling, medication-assisted treatment, or inpatient
rehabilitation, as well as ongoing recovery support like peer mentoring and relapse prevention services.
Case management is critical to help individuals navigate healthcare systems, obtain benefits, and secure
stable housing. Mental health services are often essential, as many individuals experience co-occurring
disorders that require integrated care.Transportation assistance can help ensure access to treatment,
employment, and community resources. Additionally, employment support, life skills training, and legal
advocacy can assist individuals in rebuilding their lives and maintaining long-term recovery.aAACAAAc
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 76
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
253
Persons with HIV&AIDS.The Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS(HOPWA) grants use general
objectives to guide assistance. HOPWA programs can be accessed through the local CoC's coordinated
entry system; HOPWA services aim to:aAAz Increase the availability of decent, safe, and affordable
housing for lower income persons with HIV/AIDS; Create and support affordable housing units for
persons with HIV/AIDS by matching HOPWA resources through community planning for comprehensive
housing strategies; Create partnerships and innovative strategies among local governments and non-
profit organizations to identify and serve the housing and supportive services needs of persons with
HIV/AI DSaAAz aAAz-
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health
institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
<TYPE=[text] REPORT_GUID=[F8DC4D3147433947165558A235C46686]
PLAN_SECTION_I D=[1350402000]>
Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address
the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with
respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year
goals. 91.315(e)
For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to
undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs
identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but
have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2))
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 77
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
254
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing — 91.210(e)
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 78
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
255
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets — 91.215 (f)
Introduction
Yakima's economy has deep roots in agriculture, driven by the development of irrigation infrastructure and railroads since the early 20th
century. As Washington State's leading agricultural county,Yakima produces more apples, hops, corn, spearmint, peppermint,grapes, and wine
grapes than any other region in the state.This booming agricultural base underpins local fruit processing industries and remains the central pillar
of economic activity.
Yakima has begun to diversify its economy. Public services, healthcare, and education have become major employers.The region has also placed
strategic emphasis on manufacturing, logistics, and value-added agri-businesses, aided by institutions like the Yakima County Development
Association (YCDA/New Vision) and local economic development agencies.
The median household income is somewhat below national average and there are persistent cost-of-living and housing burdens. Recognizing
these challenges, recent city and county plans prioritize infrastructure upgrades, workforce development, and business retention and
recruitment to foster resilience and inclusive growth.
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity
Business by Sector Number of Number of Jobs Share of Workers Share of Jobs Jobs less workers
Workers % % %
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 8,176 6,169 25 15 -10
Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 3,619 4,677 11 11 0
Construction 1,630 1,406 5 3 -2
Education and Health Care Services 6,392 11,697 19 29 10
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 982 1,444 3 4 1
Information 423 542 1 1 0
Manufacturing 3,014 3,581 9 9 0
Other Services 807 1,183 2 3 1
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 79
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
256
Business by Sector Number of Number of Jobs Share of Workers Share of Jobs Jobs less workers
Workers % % %
Professional, Scientific, Management Services 1,238 1,413 4 3 -1
Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0
Retail Trade 4,053 6,132 12 15 3
Transportation and Warehousing 902 692 3 2 -1
Wholesale Trade 1,830 1,789 6 4 -2
Total 33,066 40,725 -- -- --
Table 36-Business Activity
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS(Workers),2020 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics(Jobs)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 80
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
257
Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 42,020
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and
over 39,410
Unemployment Rate 6.21
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 17.14
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 3.66
Table 37-Labor Force
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 5,840
Farming,fisheries and forestry occupations 2,255
Service 4,170
Sales and office 8,165
Construction, extraction, maintenance and
repair 6,200
Production,transportation and material
moving 3,470
Table 38—Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Travel Time
Travel Time Number Percentage
<30 Minutes 31,273 84%
30-59 Minutes 5,096 14%
60 or More Minutes 963 3%
Total 37,332 100%
Table 39-Travel Time
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Education:
Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older)
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
Less than high school graduate 6,905 695 3,300
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 81
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
258
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian Employed Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 8,155 455 3,440
Some college or Associate's degree 9,735 365 3,080
Bachelor's degree or higher 6,705 90 790
Table 40- Educational Attainment by Employment Status
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18-24 yrs 25-34 yrs 35-44 yrs 45-65 yrs 65+yrs
Less than 9th grade 310 535 1,780 2,950 1,300
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 2,560 1,890 1,635 2,115 1,205
High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 3,195 4,175 3,010 4,875 3,410
Some college, no degree 2,330 2,670 2,780 4,110 3,660
Associate's degree 650 1,190 935 1,540 960
Bachelor's degree 395 1,685 1,160 1,970 2,060
Graduate or professional degree 59 610 680 1,475 1,505
Table 41-Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Educational Attainment- Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Less than high school graduate 24,460
High school graduate (includes equivalency) 29,205
Some college or Associate's degree 33,825
Bachelor's degree 50,054
Graduate or professional degree 67,742
Table 42-Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Data Source: 2016-2020 ACS
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
(CEDS)?
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 82
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
259
If so,what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated
with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that
impact economic growth.
<TYPE=[text] REPORT_GUID=[F8DC4D3147433947165558A235C46686]
PLAN_SECTION_I D=[1370705000]>
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 83
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
260
Strategic Plan
SP-05 Overview
Strategic Plan Overview
The Strategic Plan serves as a planning document that outlines the anticipated resources from CDBG and
HOME funding, program income, and other sources over the course of five years. Additionally, a series
of goals is described, illuminating how the City will prioritize available financial resources,geographic
priorities, and expected outcomes.
Priorities and goals were determined through analysis of multiple data sources:
• Comprehensive community surveys and meetings
• Interview and consultation with area stakeholders
• Staff recommendations
• Results of previous monitoring of subrecipients
• HUD Annual Homeless Assessment Report
• HUD Worst Case Housing Needs
• Policy Map, Community Profile
• HUD Community Resiliency Kit
• Community Housing Assessment Strategy(CHAS) data
• American Housing Survey(AHS) data
• American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates
• City Studies and Plans
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 84
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
261
SP-10 Geographic Priorities — 91.215 (a)(1)
<TYPE=[pivot_table] REPORT_GUID=[580A1C4243185DA4A57AD1B7DE5CFB16] >
Table 43-Geographic Priority Areas
General Allocation Priorities
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA
for HOPWA)
Both Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) and HOME Investment funds are used citywide.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 85
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
262
SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)
Priority Needs
Table 44—Priority Needs Summary
1 Priority Need Provide Decent Housing
Name
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally III
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic
Areas
Affected
Associated Administration and Planning
Goals Housing
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 86
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
263
Description A decent place to live removes the barriers to opportunity, success, and health
that have been part of a family's life for years, if not generations. Creating safe
and decent places to live can have incredibly positive effects on a family's health,
students' study habits, and a neighborhood's overall attractiveness and stability.
Decent housing includes a spectrum of solutions: new construction, repair and
renovation, housing finance, infrastructure development, and secure land
tenure, among others.
Basis for Providing people with a range of housing choices has many positive aspects—
Relative both for the community in general and for individual families. As individuals and
Priority families move from one stage of life to the next, various housing types enable
them to live in a place that suits their needs while allowing them to reside in the
same community, keeping those ties and staying close to family members if they
desire.
2 Priority Need Create A Suitable Living Environment
Name
Priority Level High
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 87
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
264
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally III
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Non-housing Community Development
Geographic
Areas
Affected
Associated Administration and Planning
Goals Housing
Public Services
Neighborhood Improvements and Public Facilities
Description A good living environment is essential for a good quality of life. A functional and
sound living environment enables different people to lead their daily lives and
fulfill their basic needs, including living, services, working, recreation, hobbies,
rest, and privacy.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 88
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
265
Basis for Jobs,family income,transportation costs, and housing are intricately connected.
Relative New research has demonstrated that stable families, communities, and housing
Priority have a positive impact on economic vitality. Providing opportunities for workers
to live in the city where they work has a positive effect on in-commuting and
reduces transportation costs. Improvements to infrastructure and parks in
eligible neighborhoods can have a significant impact on long-term livability.
3 Priority Need Expand Opportunities for LMI Persons
Name
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low
Low
Moderate
Middle
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Public Housing Residents
Chronic Homelessness
Individuals
Families with Children
Mentally III
Chronic Substance Abuse
veterans
Persons with HIV/AIDS
Victims of Domestic Violence
Unaccompanied Youth
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Non-housing Community Development
Geographic
Areas
Affected
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 89
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
266
Associated Administration and Planning
Goals Housing
Public Services
Neighborhood Improvements and Public Facilities
Description Expanding opportunities for low-and moderate-income persons helps to foster
local economic advancement, neighborhood improvement, and individual self-
sufficiency.
Basis for Expanding opportunities for low-and moderate-income residents helps residents
Relative become financially stable and remain in safe and stable housing.
Priority
Narrative (Optional)
The City of Yakima seeks to encourage viable community development by promoting integrated
approaches that provide decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expand economic
opportunities for low-and moderate-income persons.The primary means towards this end is the
development of partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, including for-profit
and non-profit organizations. Housing and community development are not viewed as separate
programs but rather as the various elements that make up a comprehensive vision of community
development.
Needs were identified to align with HUD CDBG objectives.The listed needs cover each of the critical
areas identified by community stakeholders.
This narrative section, while optional, does help to frame the goals and projects outlined elsewhere in
this plan.
Discreet activities are identified once the plan is approved and are a function of the reporting side of
IDIS.
Needs identified correlate directly to goals identified elsewhere in the following way:
Provide Decent Housing
The need for decent, affordable housing is the focus of the housing goal, as well as public services.The
City of Yakima will work with stakeholders to identify opportunities to develop, build, and preserve
affordable housing, and work to provide supportive services to decrease housing insecurity among the
most vulnerable city residents.
Create a Suitable Living Environment
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 90
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
267
This need will be addressed by both the public service, housing and public facility/infrastructure
improvement goals.The city is working with community stakeholders to identify critical, unmet public
service needs; identify opportunities to help LMI residents stay in their homes through housing rehab,
thereby preserving affordable housing; and undertaking ADA and other infrastructure and facility
improvements to create a more suitable living environment for Yakima's LMI residents.
Expand Opportunities for LMI Persons
This need, in the short term, will be addressed by increasing access to facilities and infrastructure with
necessary improvements, along with access to funding resources.This may include sidewalk installation,
park upgrades, direct assistance to homebuyers, and other activities associated with expanded physical
and financial access for LMI Yakima residents.
Planning and Administration are considered to support each need, goal, and project outlined in this
Consolidated Plan.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 91
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
268
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions — 91.215 (b)
Influence of Market Conditions
Affordable Market Characteristics that will influence
Housing Type the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based Due to limited resources and staff capacity,the City of Yakima does not
Rental Assistance operate a TBRA program. Referrals to other agencies, including Yakima Housing
(TBRA) Authority help residents secure needed resources.
TBRA for Non- Due to limited resources and staff capacity,the City of Yakima does not
Homeless Special operate a TBRA program. Referrals to other agencies, including Yakima Housing
Needs Authority help residents secure needed resources.
New Unit The City of Yakima collaborates with CBDO and other affordable housing
Production development organizations, prioritizing the addition of new units.These
partnerships have been successful in leveraging limited funds for development.
HOME-ARP funding also supported the development of new units targeted to
qualifying populations.
The city will continue these partnerships through this Consolidated Plan cycle.
Rehabilitation The City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services will continue
to operate and manage an emergency repair program targeted to eligible
homeowners.This program has been successful in helping LMI homeowners
with critical repairs, allowing them to continue enjoying their homes in a
healthy and safe manner.
The city also operates a ramp program targeted at senior and disabled
residents, allowing them increased safe access to continue living in their
homes.This rehabilitation will continue to be offered.
Funding may also be available to affordable housing partners to rehabilitate
existing housing.This helps keep critical affordable units in service for the
foreseeable future.
Acquisition, With development partners,the city explores acquisition opportunities to
including increase affordable housing in Yakima.
preservation
Table 45—Influence of Market Conditions
HAMFI in Yakima
A family in Yakima is considered low-to moderate-income f80%HAMFI) if their annual income is;
$53,100 as a single-person household
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 92
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
269
$60,700 as a two-person household
$68,300 as a three-person household
$75,850 as a four-person household
$81,950 as a five-person household
$88,000 as a six-person household
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 93
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
270
SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
Anticipated Resources
Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description
of Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available
$ $ $ Remainder
of ConPlan
$
CDBG public- Acquisition Formula grants for housing and
federal Admin and community development activities.
Planning Beneficiaries must have low-or
Economic moderate-income (up to 80%AMI), or
Development reside in a low/moderate-income
Housing neighborhood.
Public
Improvements
Public Services 1,023,311 20,000 1,440,000 2,483,311 4,093,244
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 94
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
271
Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description
of Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available
$ $ $ Remainder
of ConPlan
HOME public- Acquisition Formula grants to implement local
federal Homebuyer housing strategies.Tenants served
assistance must be below 60%AMI;
Homeowner homeownership activities for
rehab households up to 80%AMI. Requires
Multifamily 25% non-federal matching funds.
rental new
construction
Multifamily
rental rehab
New
construction for
ownership
TBRA 502,273 50,000 497,000 1,049,273 2,009,088
Table 46-Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how
matching requirements will be satisfied
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Notice CPD-97-03: HOME Program Match Guidance provides guidance on identifying
eligible sources of match, calculating the value of matching contributions, determining the point at which a contribution may be recognized as
match, and tracking matching obligations and contributions.
Projects with firm financial commitments, including leveraged dollars, will have priority over those with pending,tentative, or speculative
commitments.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 95
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
272
If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs
identified in the plan
Publicly owned lands have not yet been identified to help address the needs of this plan.Yakima will continue to explore opportunities to access
viable public lands whenever possible, helping to address critical needs identified in this 5-year Consolidated Plan.
Discussion
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 96
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
273
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 97
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
274
SP-45 Goals Summary— 91.215(a)(4)
Goals Summary Information
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
1 Administration and 2025 2029 Affordable Provide Decent CDBG: Other:
Planning Housing Housing $1,023,310 5 Other
Public Housing Create A Suitable HOME:
Homeless Living $251,135
Non-Homeless Environment
Special Needs Expand
Non-Housing Opportunities for
Community LMI Persons
Development
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 98
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
275
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
2 Housing 2025 2029 Affordable Provide Decent CDBG: Rental units constructed:
Housing Housing $4,253,245 10 Household Housing Unit
Create A Suitable HOME:
Living $2,807,226 Rental units rehabilitated:
Environment 10 Household Housing Unit
Expand
Opportunities for Homeowner Housing Added:
LMI Persons 5 Household Housing Unit
Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated:
75 Household Housing Unit
Direct Financial Assistance to
Homebuyers:
5 Households Assisted
3 Public Services 2025 2029 Affordable Create A Suitable CDBG: Public service activities other
Housing Living $650,000 than Low/Moderate Income
Public Housing Environment Housing Benefit:
Homeless Expand 500 Persons Assisted
Non-Homeless Opportunities for
Special Needs LMI Persons Public service activities for
Non-Housing Low/Moderate Income
Community Housing Benefit:
Development 50 Households Assisted
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 99
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
276
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
4 Neighborhood 2025 2029 Homeless Create A Suitable CDBG: Public Facility or
Improvements and Non-Homeless Living $650,000 Infrastructure Activities other
Public Facilities Special Needs Environment than Low/Moderate Income
Non-Housing Expand Housing Benefit:
Community Opportunities for 7500 Persons Assisted
Development LMI Persons
Table 47—Goals Summary
Goal Descriptions
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 100
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
277
1 Goal Name Administration and Planning
Goal General Administrative funds will pay reasonable program administrative costs and carrying charges related to planning
Description and executing community development activities. Administering federal funds and ensuring compliance is critical for
utilizing Federal resources.Yakima is committed to using CDBG entitlement funding for administration to help continue
growing an efficient, effective, and resourceful community development program.
Yakima may have administration and planning projects that include, but are not limited to:
• General management, oversight, and coordination
• Providing local officials and citizens with information about the CDBG program
• Preparing budgets and schedules
• Preparing reports and other HUD-required documents
• Program planning
• Public Information
• Monitoring program activities
• Fair Housing activities
• Submission of applications for Federal Programs
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 101
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
278
2 Goal Name Housing
Goal The City prioritized goals and objectives for using CDBG and HOME funding to strategically and effectively benefit low-and
Description moderate-income residents by increasing access to decent housing and creating a suitable living environment while
expanding economic opportunities for LMI persons.Yakima is committed to improving and expanding access to safe and
affordable housing for low-and moderate-income (LMI) residents. Affordable and safe housing helps to provide financial
stability, reduces the chances of a person becoming homeless, and promotes housing sustainability.
Yakima's projects to improve housing sustainability may include, but are not limited to:
• Rehabilitation (single-unit residential and/or multi-family residential)
• The administrative cost for rehabilitation activities
• Lead-based paint testing/abatement
• Homeownership Housing Development and Construction
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 102
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
279
3 Goal Name Public Services
Goal Public services are an integral part of a comprehensive community development strategy. Public Service activities provide
Description a wide range of activities that address needs in the community provided for the target population. Public services can
strengthen communities by addressing the needs of specific populations.They can address a range of individual needs and
increase the impact of CDBG dollars by complementing other activities.
Yakima may allocate up to 15%of CDBG funds to public services programs that provide supportive services to low-to
moderate-income persons or prevent homelessness. In general,these services are provided by local non-profit partners.
This funding is capped at 15%of the CDBG entitlement.
Yakima's goal to improve and provide public services may include, but is not limited to:
• Services for Homeless Persons
• Services to help prevent homelessness
• Child care
• Health services
• Substance use services
• Services for Domestic Violence Victims
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 103
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
280
4 Goal Name Neighborhood Improvements and Public Facilities
Goal Neighborhood Improvements will focus on safe and accessible infrastructure essential to the quality of life and building
Description communities that support community diversity and stability. Public infrastructure improvements will generally include the
acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and installation of public infrastructure.
Yakima's goal to improve and expand public infrastructure may include, but is not limited to:
• ADA Improvements
• Sidewalks
• Curb cuts
• Park and Open Space Improvements
Public Facilities and Improvements are publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure such as streets, playgrounds,
underground utilities, and buildings owned by nonprofits open to the general public. Safe and accessible infrastructure is
essential to the quality of life and building communities that support community diversity and stability. Public facilities and
public improvements are generally interpreted to include all facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or
owned by a nonprofit and open to the general public.Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and
installation of public facilities and improvements are eligible activities.
Yakima's goal to improve and expand public facilities may include, but is not limited to:
• Senior Centers
• Homeless and Domestic Violence Facilities
• Neighborhood Facilities
• Health Facilities
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide
affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 104
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
281
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement — 91.215(c)
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary
Compliance Agreement)
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. §794,that prohibits
discrimination based on disability in federally-assisted programs or activities. Specifically, Section 504
states, "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States. . .shall, solely by reason
of her or his disability, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program, service or activity receiving federal financial assistance or under any
program or activity conducted by any Executive agency or by the United States Postal Service."This
means that Section 504 prohibits discrimination based on disability in any program or activity that
receives financial assistance from any federal agency, including HUD, as well as in programs conducted
by federal agencies, including HUD.
An individual with a disability is any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially
limits one or more major life activities. The term physical or mental impairment may include, but is not
limited to, conditions such as visual or hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection,
developmental disabilities, drug addiction, or mental illness. In general,the definition of"person with
disabilities" does not include current users of illegal controlled substances. However, individuals would
be protected under Section 504 (as well as the ADA) if the purpose of the specific program or activity is
to provide health or rehabilitation services to such individuals.
The term major life activity may include,for example, seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing
manual tasks, caring for one's self, learning, speaking, or working. This list is not exhaustive. Section
504 also protects persons with a record of such impairment or who are regarded as having such an
impairment.
The Yakima Housing Authority is not under a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvements
The PHA,Yakima Housing Authority(YHA),facilitates a Resident Advisory Board (RAB).The RAB provides
input and review of plans, documents, upcoming YHA projects, and needs of the YHA resident
communities.The board is reflective of the resident community and a vital partner with YHA staff.
YHA offers learning opportunities and programs, and facilitates community offerings to residents and
voucher holders.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?
No
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 105
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
282
Plan to remove the 'troubled' designation
N/A
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 106
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
283
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.215(h)
Barriers to Affordable Housing
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing
The City of Yakima actively works to reduce barriers to affordable housing development.This includes
working with developers to decrease upfront costs.
The Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) actively partners with local and regional
agencies, working to locate affordable units in Yakima.These partnerships include funding when gaps
are identified. Developers regularly contact ONDS to discuss opportunities and are skilled at securing
other state and federal funding for activities in Yakima.
Rehabilitation activities provide low-income homeowners with the opportunity to stay safely housed in
a healthy and suitable environment.The residents who access the rehabilitation program would not
typically have an affordable option for emergency repairs, and could be in danger of becoming
unhoused due to critical needs, if the program did not exist.
Affordable housing will remain a priority throughout this Consolidated Plan cycle.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 107
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
284
SP-60 Homelessness Strategy— 91.215(d)
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
The City of Yakima's strategic plan goals include involvement in the Yakima County Continuum of Care
Plan as a city policy.The plan outlines the continuum of programs and services required to move a
family or individual from homelessness to independent living and self-sufficiency.The Continuum of
Care Plan guides the ONDS's use of resources to reduce the number of homeless households by keeping
as many senior and disabled homeowners as possible from becoming displaced through Emergency
Rehabilitation Assistance.The first priortiy of the Continuum of Care is to maintain existing resources
that serve the needs of the homeless within the community, while the City of Yakima continues to
concentrate of keeping it's Elderly, Frail Elderly and Disabled homeowners within their homes and from
becoming homeless and adding to the Continuum of Care's burden in assisting the Homeless.
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
The City of Yakima continues to work closely with Yakima Continuum of Care in addressing emergency
shelters and transitional housing needs of homeless persons with technical assistance through its
Planning Department and Office of Neighborhood Development Services.
Involvement is committees and collaborative resource sharing are key components in assisting agencies
and organization address the transitional housing needs of Yakima residents.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families,families
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness,facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were
recently homeless from becoming homeless again.
The City of Yakima will continue to invest the limited resources available to support housing
development, including transitional and permanent supportive housing. HOME-ARP funds have been
invested in activities that help secure stable, long term housing solutions for homeless Yakima residents.
ONDS staff will continue to seek opportunities to partner with affordable housing organizations to
support the critical needs of Yakima's homeless. It can be difficult to build our way out of a
homelessness problem. Providing funding to housing that includes supportive services can help bridge
the gap.
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 108
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
285
discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving
assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services,
employment, education or youth needs
Discharge coordination in Yakima and Yakima County is handled through the CORE (Community-
Oriented Re-Entry) program. CORE is a team approach to re-entry and discharge planning with access to
tenant-based housing assistance and mainstream services throught the Yakima County Homeless Service
Center.
Yakima County criminal justice, substance abuse and mental health sytems have a Crisis Triage Center to
coordinate servies for people with mental health and/or substance abuse disorders who tend to cycle
through the jail and the hospital emergency department.The CORE team members collaborate with
Yakima County Homeless Services Center's rapid exit coordinator and housing specialist to provide
housing solutions.
Washington State Department of Corrections Reentry programs offer various forms of support, including
job training, educational opportunities, substance abuse treatment, and mental health services.
Coordinated Entry is the county-wide intake, prioritization, and referral system used to get resources to
those with the highest need, regardless of where they are. Coordinated Entry takes a "no wrong door"
policy by offering multiple Access Points across the community. Once an individual experiencing
homelessness completes a Coordinated Entry intake at any of the county-wide Access Points,they will
be eligible for services from across a confidential network of providers.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 109
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
286
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards — 91.215(i)
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards
Lead poisoning is the most significant and prevalent disease of environmental origin among children
living in the United States. Lead exposures remain prevalent despite considerable knowledge and
increased screening and intervention efforts. Environmental lead is a toxic substance that affects the
growth and development of up to one million U.S. preschool children today,with effects ranging from
learning disabilities to death. High levels of lead can cause many health problems by damaging the brain,
nervous system, and kidneys. Lead poisoning can cause decreased intelligence, behavioral and speech
problems, anemia, decreased muscle and bone growth, poor muscle coordination, and hearing damage.
Increased lead exposure and increased body burden of lead remain a significant problem for children in
the United States. Lead is an environmental toxicant that may cause adverse health effects to the
nervous, hematopoietic, endocrine, renal, and reproductive systems. Lead exposure in young children is
particularly hazardous because children absorb lead more readily than adults. Many children exposed to
lead do not exhibit any signs that they have the disease. Any signs or symptoms the child may have
could be mistaken for other illnesses, and the child goes undiagnosed. Children's developing nervous
system is particularly susceptible to the effects of lead.The underdeveloped blood-brain barrier in
young children increases the risk of lead entering the developing nervous system resulting in
neurobehavioral disorders. Blood lead levels (BLLs), at any detectable level, have been shown to cause
behavioral and developmental disorders.Therefore, no safe blood lead level in children has been
identified. It is increasingly important for continued childhood lead poisoning prevention education and
awareness.
Lead-contaminated water, soil, and paint are potential sources of children's lead exposure. Dust from
deteriorating lead-based paint is considered to be the largest contributor to the lead problem. Until the
1950s, many homes were covered inside and out with leaded paints. Lead began to fall from favor in the
1950s but was still commonly used until it was banned from use in homes after 1977. Because of the
long-term use of lead-based paints, many homes in the United States contain paint surfaces that are
now peeling, chalking,flaking, or wearing away.The dust or paint chips contain high levels of lead that
easily find ways into the mouths of young children. A particular problem has emerged due to a large
number of homes with lead-based paints, which are now undergoing renovations. Often the dust
created by this work has high lead levels, which are readily absorbed by the children's developing
bodies.
The City of Yakima housing rehabilitation program will continue during this CP cycle. By providing
emergency rehabilitation assistance to eligible Yakima residents,the city will support housing stock
preservation for vulnerable households.Yakima staff manage rehabilitation internally,with qualified
staff,to rehab pre-1978 homes as part of this project.The city and any needed contractors will utilize
the LSHR Toolkit forms and guidance to ensure all lead hazards related to rehabilitation are properly
addressed.This project will assist in addressing lead hazards in homes assisted.The city will also share
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 110
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
287
lead hazard information with applicants, including those on any wait list or households not
subsequently enrolled in the project.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
The above actions are taken to ensure that homeowners receiving assistance with CDBG-funded housing
rehabilitation are protected from exposure to lead hazards.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
The City is required to comply with HUD lead-safe housing rule (LSHR). Additionally,the City has lead-
based paint policies and procedures that outline compliance with LSHR.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 111
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
288
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy— 91.215(j)
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families
The City of Yakima continues to collaborate with key local public and private agencies in developing a
unified vision for area economic development,guiding and coordinating local actions that promote or
expand living-wage job opportunities. By continuing to take action, when possible,to promote activities
that support increased self-sufficiency through stable housing and public services, and providing a more
suitable physical environment,the city helps address poverty in our area.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this
affordable housing plan
The goals and strategies outlined in the Consolidated Plan for CDBG and HOME funding,which primarily
address housing and human services, most often directly address these poverty issues.Yakima funding
(CDBG and general fund) supports multiple public and human service programs, including transitional
living, services for the mentally ill, and CDBG and HOME funding for permanent and transitional housing
development, as well as housing rehabilitation. All of these initiatives align with the goals and strategies
of reducing poverty.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 112
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
289
SP-80 Monitoring — 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities
carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with
requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the
comprehensive planning requirements
Yakima staff will work closely with HUD to ensure that all statutory requirements are met and that the
information reported in the City's CAPER is accurate and complete. Additionally, city staff will
participate in regular online and on-site HUD training, when available.
Monitoring is an ongoing,two-way communication process between the City and recipients. The goal
of monitoring is to encourage the completion of projects within the contract period while ensuring that
project objectives are met. Successful monitoring involves frequent telephone contacts,written
communications, analysis of reports and audits, and periodic meetings.
Monitoring is the principal means by which the City:
• Ensures that HUD-funded programs and technical areas are carried out efficiently, effectively,
and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations
• Assists subrecipients in improving their performance, developing or increasing capacity, and
augmenting their management and technical skills
• Stays abreast of the efficacy and technical areas of HUD CDBG and HOME programs.
• Documents the effectiveness of programs administered by the subrecipients.
The City performs a risk assessment of subrecipients to identify which subrecipients require
comprehensive monitoring. High-risk subrecipients include those that are:
• New to the CDBG and/or HOME programs;
• Experience turnover in key staff positions or change in goals or directions;
• Encountering complaints and/or bad press;
• Previous compliance or performance problems including failure to meet schedules, submit
timely reports, or clear monitoring or audit findings;
• Carrying out high-risk activities (economic development,job creation, etc.);
• Undertaking multiple CDBG or HOME-funded activities for the first time
The City and CDBG and HOME subrecipients are held accountable to program goals through a range of
monitoring and timeliness activities.
Monitoring Visits:The City will conduct an annual visit or desk monitoring of all subrecipients. On-site
visits may include an on-site interview, inspection of financial and client records relating to the CDBG or
HOME funding provided, evaluation of the subrecipient's performance, analysis of the strengths and
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 113
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
290
weaknesses of the program, assurance that activities comply with the Action Plan, and a report by the
subrecipients of any needs, such as technical assistance or areas for program enhancement.
Evaluating Performance: Performance is measured against the goals identified in the initial CDBG or
HOME subrecipient agreement. During the annual monitoring visit,the subrecipient has an opportunity
to explain how goals and objectives for the year were achieved or why their goals were not reached. A
follow-up letter to each subrecipient concludes the annual monitoring visit process. The letter
summarizes the findings of the visit, and a copy is kept on file for reference.
Financial Management: Financial management oversight activities are also conducted each time a
subrecipient requests reimbursement. City staff will verify that the subrecipient has started their
program and is progressing toward their goals before approving a reimbursement
request. Subrecipients also must submit the appropriate documentation to be reimbursed.
Data Management:The City will update the program and financial information in the Integrated
Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) regularly to meet HUD's Timeliness requirements. The City
will obtain program information from the monthly or quarterly reports received from the CDBG and/or
HOME subrecipients.
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 114
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
291
Consolidated Plan YAKIMA 115
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
292
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
Anticipated Resources
Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description
of Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Funds Allocation:$ Income:$ Resources:$ $ Available
Remainder of
ConPlan
$
CDBG public- Acquisition Formula grants for housing
federal Admin and and community
Planning development activities.
Economic Beneficiaries must have
Development low-or moderate-income
Housing (up to 80%AMI), or reside
Public in a low/moderate-income
Improvements neighborhood.
Public Services 1,023,311.00 20,000.00 1,440,000.00 2,483,311.00 4,093,244.00
Annual Action Plan 1
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
293
Program Source Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative Description
of Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Funds Allocation:$ Income:$ Resources:$ $ Available
Remainder of
ConPlan
HOME public- Acquisition Formula grants to
federal Homebuyer implement local housing
assistance strategies.Tenants served
Homeowner must be below 60%AMI;
rehab homeownership activities
Multifamily for households up to 80%
rental new AMI. Requires 25%non-
construction federal matching funds.
Multifamily
rental rehab
New
construction for
ownership
TBRA 502,272.76 50,000.00 497,000.00 1,049,272.76 2,009,088.00
Table 1- Expected Resources—Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how
matching requirements will be satisfied
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Notice CPD-97-03: HOME Program Match Guidance provides guidance on identifying
eligible sources of match, calculating the value of matching contributions, determining the point at which a contribution may be recognized as
match, and tracking matching obligations and contributions.
Projects with firm financial commitments, including leveraged dollars, will have priority over those with pending,tentative, or speculative
commitments.
Annual Action Plan 2
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
294
If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that
may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
Publicly owned lands have not yet been identified to help address the needs of this plan.Yakima will
continue to explore opportunities to access viable public lands whenever possible, helping to address
critical needs identified in this 5-year Consolidated Plan.
Discussion
Annual Action Plan 3
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
295
Annual Goals and Objectives
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives
Goals Summary Information
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
1 Administration and 2025 2029 Affordable Provide Decent CDBG: Other: 1 Other
Planning Housing Housing $204,662.00
Public Housing Create A Suitable HOME:
Homeless Living $50,227.00
Non-Homeless Environment
Special Needs Expand
Non-Housing Opportunities for
Community LMI Persons
Development
Annual Action Plan 4
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
296
Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Order Year Year Area
2 Housing 2025 2029 Affordable Provide Decent CDBG: Rental units constructed: 2
Housing Housing $1,978,649.00 Household Housing Unit
Create A Suitable HOME: Rental units rehabilitated: 2
Living $999,045.76 Household Housing Unit
Environment Homeowner Housing Added: 1
Expand Household Housing Unit
Opportunities for Homeowner Housing
LMI Persons Rehabilitated: 15 Household
Housing Unit
Direct Financial Assistance to
Homebuyers: 1 Households
Assisted
3 Public Services 2025 2029 Affordable Create A Suitable CDBG: Public service activities other
Housing Living $150,000.00 than Low/Moderate Income
Public Housing Environment Housing Benefit: 100 Persons
Homeless Expand Assisted
Non-Homeless Opportunities for Public service activities for
Special Needs LMI Persons Low/Moderate Income Housing
Non-Housing Benefit: 10 Households Assisted
Community
Development
4 Neighborhood 2025 2029 Homeless Create A Suitable CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure
Improvements and Non-Homeless Living $150,000.00 Activities other than
Public Facilities Special Needs Environment Low/Moderate Income Housing
Non-Housing Expand Benefit: 1500 Persons Assisted
Community Opportunities for
Development LMI Persons
Table 2—Goals Summary
Annual Action Plan 5
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
297
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name Administration and Planning
Goal Description
2 Goal Name Housing
Goal Description
3 Goal Name Public Services
Goal Description
4 Goal Name Neighborhood Improvements and Public Facilities
Goal Description
Annual Action Plan 6
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
298
Projects
AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d)
Introduction
Staff first reviews applications to ensure they meet all federal program requirements before evaluating
them for selection and funding.
A risk analysis is completed for each activity prior to funding.
Projects
# Project Name
Table 3-Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved
needs
Federal CDBG funds are intended to provide low-and moderate-income households with viable
communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment, and extended economic
opportunities. Eligible activities include housing rehabilitation and preservation, homeownership
opportunities, public services, community infrastructure improvements, planning, and administration.
The system for establishing the priority for the selection of these projects is predicated upon the
following criteria:
• Meeting the statutory requirements of the CDBG and HOME programs
• Meeting the needs of low-and moderate-income residents
• Coordination and leveraging of resources
• Response to expressed community needs
• Sustainability and/or long-term impact, and
• The ability to demonstrate measurable progress and success.
The primary obstacles to meeting underserved needs are the limited resources available to address
identified priorities. When feasible,the City of Yakima will partner with other public agencies and
nonprofit organizations to leverage resources and maximize outcomes in housing and community
development. In the end, however,the need far exceeds the funding available from all sources
combined.
Annual Action Plan 7
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
299
Annual Action Plan 8
2025
OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.09/30/2021)
300
2025 CDBG and HOME Draft Budget Proposal
City of Yakima, Office of Neighborhood Development Services
2025 Entitlement Anticipated 2025 Estimated Prior TOTAL
Funds Program Income Year Resources FUNDING
CDBG $1,023,311.00 $20,000.00 $1,440,000.00 $2,483,311.00
Administration $204,662.20 $0.00 $0.00 $204,662.20
Emergency home repair program $568,648.80 $20,000.00 $1,390,000.00 $1,978,648.80
Public services $125,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
Infrastructure: sidewalk improvements $125,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 $150,000.00
Remaining balances $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
HOME $502,272.76 $50,000.00 $497,000.00 $1,049,272.76
Administration $50,277.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,277.00
New construction $316,995.76 $35,000.00 $452,000.00 $803,995.76
CHDO Set aside $90,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 $105,000.00
First Time Homebuyer program $45,000.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 $90,000.00
Remaining balances $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
CDBG-CV $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Administration $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Remaining balances $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
HOME-ARP $0.00 $0.00 $183,000.00 $183,000.00
Administration $0.00 $0.00 $183,000.00 $183,000.00
Remaining balances $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
301