The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/13/2025 03.C. Design Options - 6th Ave Rebuild & Rail Renovation Project 2796 r:- `y 7 ljlt '111 s . BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 3.C. For Meeting of: May 13, 2025 ITEM TITLE: Design Options - 6th Ave Rebuild & Rail Renovation Project 2796 (TBD Fund) SUBMITTED BY: * Bill Preston, Acting City Engineer Michael Uhlman, HLA Engineering Aaron Luoma, HBB SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Present public outreach efforts and results. Ask Council for direction regarding project elements trails and trolley assets along the corridor. Options will be provided and asking for direction on June 3. ITEM BUDGETED: N/A STRATEGIC PRIORITY 24-25: A Resilient Yakima RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 2025_0506 -Yakima 6th -- Council Presentation b_w.pdf 26 a ima6th Rebuild and R Project City Council Presentation May 13, 2025 Bill Preston, PE Michael Uhlman, PE Aaron Luoma, ASLA City of Yakima HLA Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc. HBB Community and Economic Consultant - Lead Engineer Consultant - Public Outreach Development Director 27 Agenda • Backstory (why we are here) • Council's role • Options presented and why • Public Outreach efforts • Next steps 28 . . ki).0._ ... 1 Project Li m its I - ,i21 - - -- ..\\ • 6th Avenue between • Organized into Walnut Street and three sections = II River Road 1 based on character a____,_ _ r Ilk:, 04 ' \ _.--,-- • -NI Key Industrial) ' AI 'IA V - _ „ - -- -ftle 111V--- ill --- die Commercial Project , Corridor f ti. 1 + S • 29 Backstory • Primarily a rehabilitation project • YMC (Complete Streets, standards, etc.) _ • Additional elements along the route ` " - 1N I • Heightened public interest in the project • Funded with TBD (other funds may be available) „ 30 Council 's Role • Consider public feedback for policy direction • Provide direction on elements to incorporate into final design • Provide funding • Not design • Decision to be made June 3, 2025 rek,'1? 31 Project Outline V-: • i. ,-,,, • • • . A ! ! ! ! . ern/ STEP 01 STEP 02 STEP 03 STEP 04 STEP 05 Design Project Project Council Engineering Conception Kickoff Outreach Direction and Construction 61 32 .., YakimaValleyTrolley „ .. „..7, � _ 6 ti r . 1 • Owned by City of Yakima, i operated by Yakima Valley . , - ,- y ,�; �a. 1 Trolleys r - ..r,.4.a,, r . 1, ,.t: ' �+ a • ; • Bridge to Selah restoration is . _ r planned with WSDOT funding • Presently, electric catenary lines are out of commission, t �r .«A. -. . trolley uses diesel engine Ili �;r� • �� y • Poor track condition • Important to national trolley - - rail history - __. . . _ . . ._ _ .W... Remaining Historic Routes of Yakima Valley Transportation Co.with modern aerial image J 33 William 0 . Douglas Trail -- � Infrastructure Present • 80-mile trail from Yakima to Mt. Rainier National Park ' • 2.5 miles through City 111 • Current infrastructure for trail on 6th ends at Infrastructure Hathaway St & I St (.75 mi) - Absent • Historic birthplace home on N 5th Ave and W MAIO MLK Blvd • Trail route ends at the trolley barn no A 34 Other considerations • Utilities (Water, sewer, etc.) • Multi-modal options • Franchise impacts (irrigation, power, cable, etc.) • Parking • Intersections • Schools 35 Existing Sections 1 ` _ f Industrial — Right-of-Way 60' ta River Road to Fruitvale Blvd V : _, lat . la � i 1 ; e----- I 1 dilireki 1 1 1 -- , It 1 Key - !_.•.i i 1 i al ill 11. I le 1 3rr i a , + k4 14' 12' 6 12' 13 1 Buffer William O. Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane Sidewalk Commercial I Douglas Trail y - Project Corridor 31 *existing widths insufficent for all present uses. 1- .- 10 Yakima 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation -0 i 36 - \ ..,, .... Existing - ___, _ . • _ , „ . . Conditions • 1 Ilk: , . ___ r c:: e 1 ryi��f_ !Siip W* f I_:—1 _ Ilii ... *IA\ ..,..- . \ \ vk • - 37 ... Existing ____, _ \* , Conditions � 1 _ - , _ NI,,....,,, i . • Track diamond _.----- iii _ - removed by __-_- - railroad due to safety concerns 4 -oli w iii, lit, -.' J-...k''' i Itilki wL�4 1 y ' s4Ra 5 IM illigailigkalli ' 4 4( •'''' iiill I I 1,40 a 1 .., .-. WWI\ \ 38 Existing \ . I . '-?El-'-g Conditions .. _ _i ''' '' II: 1 .f • Portion of William lir - - ' O. Douglas Trail -� = sr constructed withs RCOfunding 1 , Y mu* It iltiltill ' *WI 0 1RIMIi IFIRTIRIPMMITIMMTIF 39 Existing Sections I 14114' , I Residential — Right-of-Way 60' ! ,... ! Fruitvale Blvd to W D St gag 'AN Lip 0. F Lit O. —! It jot_._ 111 f - ' Key111110, 4rustt) - + gii, .4 , 6' 4' 8' 10' 4' 14' 8' 4' 6' i Residentia# A ,„ Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk Commercial F Buffer Trolley Buffer — Project 11111P1 =, I I I Corridor I *existing widths insufficient for all present uses.l` - \ \4ikiiiia 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation rirk,,,,-_,. /:.-') 40 Existinga ____j t . T • Conditions - 4f�� 4 ,....,,„„. ..,,_ .z............,__.________ _"-- -------- --------; _ _ ., • ' 4.:y `mot`;" tir 'IS —rue '� MI! $ 1*'fir ,'-.t7i '°'9rc 7r""ir;-- lig* i ** 1 ' - ' - ._„._ 'IP - *0 - r y y * \ . \ \ 1.teolitt 1-• 41 . . #,?. \, . - •f.",_ ..-Jk.,, ,,E,*--,,,,-.' — • .,',.•Fr war- Existi ng 1 — 1 7,i'-',t,:.:;,_ 14s;-14 ,.:4,`i,,,,eel.', , , • Conditions , I • ..x.--"N. LI 1.. we ._,-— ! ,:, 't - '— 1 fl',!' .• .11..• , ' '..•'', •,, '' ' , I, 1 1 .•, '441 LA: , .. --. 4.1E..c ,,i ..,,. ...,..:,..'! 1 i • _........_,._ . _ ___ _. _ •_ ,• ....._._ .._ . ,_ • . .. i .,_ _ • • . i . , . . , —• I i_i' k , r .1••• , , —— -. , • - b __ .-k;,_.. 1 ' SO° . ! ... , rilli,11, 11 • 4 i 1111 • , . - •., a \ - • 1W111111 . 101 II* III . . . _ Yakil .ma 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation _, • ,, .., , 42 Existing Sections 1 H r l _ . 1. Commercial — Right-of-Way 100' W D St to W Walnut St ' `;./' . 111111 Mil , '51 40 r lowl - 10, Key M`30:114, 101, ' It tt mom !:-...\_:•.., Ali OM .111S4V OM --- AV Ai \ 19' 8' 14' 10' 22' 19' Sidewalk Parking Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane 111 EMIR!! Sidewalk I Commercial": V . ,Tifil, + Project Turning r Lane L ' Corridor _0„ , ,,i,,, 17 Yakima 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation - 43 _.. Existing ___, . _ ,,... Conditions - ....0 1 r .. ... i - , 7.----acil__,—, '7_- \ ' AM ----:ACIA', . e, a . . . . , „ . . . 't .. r , • . . . . . , ,!. . • . . A. .. ��' , ., .i, .yam Y .,..___ . . K,x� .. .. ,. . . , . . • r� 44 Existingm,, `' imumi 1 Conditions' • ti F� TAEIC ilgGT ' A. , WILLIAM 0-DOUGLAS HERITAGE TRAIL i 1 mik,-,--._ - MalOP110 I> z- go., 1 RW Mail'. i , _i_.antrOpip ,. . 7 Tteticl,' 0 1 \ --' . Miliat,0616, Ill .4'‘OOkift, 1 - . . __ . - - -'1 UVIIPili , \\\\\\%. t• ., 45 Need for CommunityEngagement • Three distinct areas along corridor (industrial, residential, commercial) • Variety of stakeholders • Yakima School District (YSD), William 0 Douglas Trail (WODT) Foundation, Yakima Valley Trolley (YVT), Downtown Association of Yakima (DAY), industrial and commercial businesses, Yakima Transit, Yakima residents, and 6th Ave residents and users • Support Council decision making • Comply with funding/policy requirements • Minimize disruptions during construction 46 Project Kickoff + Phase 1 Outreach • July 26, 2024 Sept 19 Sept 19 — Oct 20 Project Introduction - Online Open House Walk and Talk Survey #1 + Focus Group 47 ________ _,________________ Walk and Talk + Focus Group ._ _ . _ _. -.-7'..--- - =7.',,T---': :r---s..- -- _ N.._ __ .._,____ c _ • July 26, 2024 .f . _ j �. -7111 1 • Walked corridor With key 4I. Is the speed of vehicle traffic along 6th Ave too fast for its current uses(industrial,local, Al commuter.or other!? stakeholders (WODT, YVT, YSD, � ��4.10LIQ- - ems. —Kr u - L .bss DAY) cL . Ik(C CIA us Teri*N +Atti6). 1'.W? ii7S-- x. -txsr *t,k 3. • Learned about existing uses and l"4t�'�"""S-T�t�ee�ir"i ., ffVg.u. {;icwscs k,,.utitst„, -�,pG'r t)Sis,P, i k)Nc� .-"ViKI�poto Gvist__I P°utr'u,N1T,ftu-{+PJ s. deficiencies of the street ,., ,,,,�f tk Ms\ �c�� 5 6 �{, ,, Are there any issues or strengths that stand out to you that we have not discussed? —Ovvait504-31 O 4, ,96?f,4'4. .407t9f, . #09$1aic31W45. —UilL.RI;S ✓ 5 SEt.t (t.3.9.1tu j — .Q:i, 0_. --M O—sate./ti col,i7 u� +eereur tic:Il4Qv,p j'.ilFC� walk.raik Yakima 6th Av uild and Rail Renovation Focus Group Session July 16,2024 �r al( rna 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation N 48 Developed Constraints and Opportunities • Responded to context of neighborhood (industrial, residential, commercial) • Incorporated feedback from Walk & Talk and Focus Group meetings • Incorporated engineering limitations • Evaluated traffic circulation patterns • Focused on improving pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure • Trolley infrastructure • Developed 3 ideas to show range of possibilities at a conceptual level • Include high level total cost for each — transportation improvements only, no catenary lines cost 49 ConceptwithTrolley _ $ 12 . 8m * ______, 1 S t t, . , , .,__ , , ,,, 1 I 9 'T • 11111111114/1 ilt t 11111Liki! 66! 1—JF . I 16`-6' i2`-6" 10' 12'46' 8.6" I 12`.6" 11' 10' 11' 8' 7`-6' I --- William O. Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane Swale William OI . Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk I I Douglas Trail * ! Douglas Trail + ITurning Lane - 'Turning Lane I - �. Industrial —Right-of-Way 60' Residential —Right-of-Way 60' Øi1 * Key Includes only I .* transportation !o ! 1_,o j improvements, does I it iipm fi' not include $2.1M • _1 . Commerual catenary lines cost William B O.raiI Bider Parking Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane Parking Buffer Sidewalk i Project Turning I Corridor LCommercial—Right-of-Way 100' 1 g Y _ • • a `ma 6t Avenue Re uild and Rail Renovation = = 50 Concept with Trolley and Couplet — $ 13 . 2m * 1 - 3 im-4-01,1=pj jihallir 1 hill cnnplel ft IIT12' 10' 32' 8' S I I 12'-6" 8' 10' 11' 8' 4'-6 6' 1:ig1CC�i1 William O. Driwe Lane Trolley price Lane Parking . William O. Buffer Trolley Drive Lane Parking Sidewalk Only Douglas Trail + dewalk Douglas Trail Buffer I - ,.. 'Diming Lane :E Industrial —Right-of-Way 60' Residential —Right-of-Way 60' '4-7 \ k Key * Includes only or- transportation '4 i improvements, does I ilf i not include 2.1M + i`, Commercial; 17' $'6" 8' 12•-6" 10' 12.6•' g' 9• 14•-6" 1 _ catenary lines cost William O. Buffer Parking Drive Lane Trolley Drive Lane Parking Buffer Sidewalk , Project Douglas Trail + T Lae Corridor \ Commercial—Right-of-Way 100' ' - - n 51 Concept with Trolley and Couplet — $ 13 . 2m ___, l l I • Fruitvale Blvd at north end, a W Lincoln Ave at south end \-- , \ • Couplet would allow for ! \ reclassification of 6th ' 'f`ouplel Avenue ' a �ftr�, • This opens it up to new r funding opportunities ' c _`— • 5th Avenue is principal 12.-6. a 11 kr d,-6-LU Buffer Trolley DriLane Paring alk arterial between Yakima Ave _-1 °°' '"T`�" IBuffn1 1 Key and Lincoln Ave Residential— Right-of-Way 60' -.. • Requires one fewer lane d - ,. and allows for more space Commercial; ° j ;.-— within existing right-of-way way Project Corridor -c 00( �'\ \ (d) 52 Concept with NoTrolley - $ 7 . 5m1 l 1 t t i r _ I I 3, lik limitai id 1 r l � , 1 — 1 Ite �- i 17'-5" 12'-5" 12'-5" 9' 8'-5" 13' 3'.5" $' Il' 11' 4%6" 7' I i-- - William O. Drive lane Drive Line Parking Sidewalk William O. Butier Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane , Sidewalk' 4 Douglas Trail Douglas Trail Buffer s Industrial —Right-of-Way 60' Residential —Right-of-Way 60' .,, ( Me -. it • ill t 1 'Commercial 14, 4,;, 1:' a'-5" 8' 12'-5" 12'-5" 19' T-5" 15' William 0. Buffer Parking Drive Lane Drive Lane Parking Buffer Sidewalk Project \_:.,_ --- Douglas Trail Corridor ,y Commercial—Right-of-Way 100' Ya (lima 6th Avenue Rebui • and Rail Renovation 53 Open H o u se -„, , ,, ' I , , . 01 1 i • September 19, 2024 5:00-7:30 pm — Garfield -i. Y s Elementary , w _ (tAf ; : � a�r 4'� ) V)A , �. a -_ • Promoted by 400 ` , doorhangers in16'. ,f � �id�; ��Will '111 g ot neighborhood, social y k g I 1 i ' media, city website, A KN DO news segment • 150+ attendees _. d 54 Online Survey # 1 • Promoted by City of Yakima, Yakima Herald, and Yakima Valley Trolley • Three concepts presented (shown prior) for consideration • 706 responses collected • 672 people told us where they lived • 320 from Yakima residents (48% of all responses) • 19 of these from 6th Avenue Residents 55 Online Survey # 1 60 • 352 (52% of all responses) 50 were non-Yakima residents 40 • 30% of these were from the Yakima valley region (not City of Yakima) 30 • 22% Out-of-state locations include: CA, 20 OR, NY, MI, IN, KY, MA, Washington DC, Canada, United Kingdom and Sweden 10 In Yakima, In Yakima, Elsewhere on 6th Avenue not on 6th Avenue 56 d• 7:7, ,-' -<`? ; is i5qA - Washington `. 'r�' ' i• .. 1 i .c Minnesota egon `' New,,T, . f _ flopy. Idaho ,, Michigan Wisconsin York f ,. Massachusetts siii'`' Pennsylvania r� r_ \ V ) llllnols • l • Indiana West Utah t Virginia Washington DC :�, r ;' 4 Colorado Virginia W I. � " Kentucky North ,� o s ',' ( ;. .1 �_ - Carolina �• \: : Tennessee 7 •. i ( - ' V , V r — Florida +1 Canada i i '' +1 Sweden Google Earth 31 f~ A,=< I +1 United Kingdom • N ,t .lr • _— Duu ml ,; 57 .. Y6 e�" id. /s , /L' _ - rirL • �� i � — .• �,Naches Gleed ,�... . -- ma f Selah -." , lc4.7 Terrace r'j, f 7a Cowiche , Heights .1 �' ;� ear. °' '' Moxee r A.. Yakima ° —[s' "fir a• -- :� ) • r • ,'�; -—% 11 `�`, Union Gap = ; .:-.: -- _r i . fir .av ,, 4 .. • -,.s. i �1 :.elf.• •'1 - '^y- ? •- f. Wapato A 9. I( f '- ss�u 1 {, Sufi nys + • ' , r Benton City x r�:r,,. : _.,� _ .i '� Grandview - , T, j � �-- I-."v • i_ + Prosser - ''�' . F ` v ! ti� fel. It * .S i / ,. try .j. -,r" •f - ' A r f, �q1 s •Fbv, 4, ' ,' -f S YW r�'Y i —4 1 • 58 Online Survey # 1 Concept Preference for All Respondents 80 70 • Concept With Trolley had ,La 60 79% support when including all respondents 50 ° 40 • Concept With Trolley had 30 77% support when filtered a. 20 for Yakima residents 10 0 - Concept- Concept- Concept - With Trolley With Trolley No Trolley and Couplet 59 Phase 1 Lessons Learned • Low participation from Spanish-speaking community • Low participation from 6th Ave residents and employees engaged • Insufficient sample size of Yakima residents engaged • Discussion centered around trolley than other project elements • Costs provided to public was simplified and lacked detail • Need for revised public outreach efforts 60 Phase 2 : Focused O 4 > n Dec 12, 2024 Jan 29, 2025 Feb 21 - 28 March 1 March 7 Industrial Commercial School Residential City-Wide Outreach Outreach Outreach Outreach Outreach 61 Cost + Fundin Project Costs •depeadadn Funding Source $7.5 million to $13.2 million' deeineletaenta incorporated Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Fund Included In Above Costs - - • Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements - $7.5 million $20 Annual fee for every license plate in Yakima • Trolley Tracks - $5.3 million Amount TBD fund Additional Costs Not Included Above $1.6 million earns annually • Catenary Lines and Poles - $2.1 million • Right-of-way acquisition $4.8 million 2025 TBD fund balance Common Costs to All Options, Not Included In Above Costs $3.6 million Current unfunded budget • Water/sewer/irrigation y to $9 millionfor 6th Ave Rebuild and • Relocating power underground LRail Renovation Project 4+" 36 L I 1 1' sh'1%�I�1 �,.i` Ih ti C h�u. i' I.d ��":_a �'�.4 i_l E; ti i ;L ' e� (r�j� ��/ 62 Design Elements suffer Driveways (Pb I Travel Lane Trolley William Oo Width Douglas Trail IIligil lui . . i , t 1 1 a rd urna 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation 63 Industrial Outreach Day • December 12, 2024 — Sweet Bee's _ restaurant — 11:30pm - 1:30pm ilw.:1377.70• Mailers, phone calls, emails to businesses '� .. � g in industrial section on corridor ` • 32 businesses invited, 8 attended — k_ _ at-- • 103 surveys and two letters received rd) 64 Commercial Outreach Day • January 29, 2025 — The Dutch — ►" u. ,, 11:30pm - 1:30pm .: • Mailers, phone calls, emails and in- rt e person to businesses in commercials 4 trivfk.--H''' section on corridor. r4 • 34 businesses invited, 13 attended - " .'- . • 32 surveys received and 1 letter a, r;d1 65 Garfield ElementaryOutreach • February 21 — 28 ` _ -- _ - _ *-- (one week to complete) ,a • Take-home surveys to every • - student in school /�4gC+T"QFYAXUIOW ' s Man N .>A". A n .PF '��"'.6Tk AYE FFBUILD Imo- - �)ae...riwun...r� r� AND RAIL RENOVATION wryl ii1l' • 289 returned surveys - - r. �.�_ • = LE -. ,� • ..mot- I Tr • COMM- �� 4'# I I �w:.� ... .-.-Teachers, parents, and students I iiiima , BLz ei,,. COST INFOAM0.I#N excited to participateILIA - =V' _ii , • Provided pizza party to two \ % 1413 Z..'"io.. �- 1 winning classes ° 7 _ wmR ,. Al a n. s. to. At _O n. At !. _ s n ft. ,,, ( ,• 66 ' - , , Residential Outreach - .1 ._- , oi i 1\‘&4110#, • March 1, 2025 — 3 locations along 6th ,,/ . Avenue — 9am-12pm • Promoted by 200 doorhangers ____ • 100+ interactions , w =- .rAL* 1f1lIYI '' L + , r ` '� • Coffee & donuts Al, • 54 surveys received QM ` ` I - �' i 67 GroceryStoreOutreach r • March 7, 2025 — 4pm-7pm ,, • Wray s on Nob Hill g • Wray's on Summitview (car tab fees paid here) • 80+ interactions • 58 surveys received • Promoted online survey #2 rd) 68 Focused Outreach Survey Results 3.5 — 3 • Represents 551 surveys to 2.5 (in-person outreach) roc cc 2 I 11111 1 .5 o I. o o s sT • rt), ) 69 Online Survey #2 • Promoted by City of Yakima and Yakima Valley Trolley on social media • Open from March 1 — March 30 • Asked about ranking element rankings • 267 responses collected • 252 people told us where they lived • no from elsewhere, not Yakima (44% of all responses) • 73 of these were from Yakima Valley region, not Yakima • 142 from Yakima residents (56% of all responses) • 8 of these from Yakima residents on 6th Avenue 70 Phase 2 Survey Results 3.5 — • Represents 818 surveys 3 (551 in-person + 267 online responses) t 2.5 2 1.5 a, . c 1 .5 0 I n I nn I I 1 1 r;),/ 71 Phase 2 Survey Results 3.5 • Represents 818 surveys 3 (551 in-person + 267 online responses) i1.5 `t 1 .5 n I _t_ 1 1 1 J ;/>) ok �tq •S .S' 4_ . ______/ 46 Yakima 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation rd 72 Corridor Usage Results 500 - • Represents 818 surveys 400 - (551 in-person + 267 online responses) O Q 1 300 - 0 200 - z To 100 - 0 I I 1 I Personal Walk Bike Trolley Truck Vehicle Freight rdt 73 Next Steps Design Elements suffer Driveways (Pb I Travel Lane Trolley William Oo Width Douglas Trail IIligil lui . . i , t 1 1 a rd urna 6th Avenue Rebuild and Rail Renovation 75 (TO if"- N\(industrial Section Right-of-Way 60' ... n ) o 0 o = = 7g, CI E-4, = ig - Cl CD ,E - .,. c-) tl , CD L' PO 1 rt , . 13 t-i- ti i . =h .= _ __ , I q , H r. = 0 CD ' •..< . fD •.< _ ..< ' • 1 l'. V: -1 ••,_ I; fD rt Residential Section Right-of-Way 60' g P 7 1 0 ..if , — I i 1 • I_ Commercial Section Right-of-Way 100' ---- 1-=-....-- -- - - — - -- ii 7 "Ar .... I. 1 0 A ° I tt :.-'2. e .141, R .3.- .,1 ii .€ __. n. pig a risi I.- I i • ...„ i F . . a - . F :- } 76 -- ....) - Cost + Fundin Project Costs •depeadadn Funding Source $7.5 million to $13.2 million' deeineletaenta incorporated Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Fund Included In Above Costs - - • Roadway and Pedestrian Improvements - $7.5 million $20 Annual fee for every license plate in Yakima • Trolley Tracks - $5.3 million Amount TBD fund Additional Costs Not Included Above $1.6 million earns annually • Catenary Lines and Poles - $2.1 million • Right-of-way acquisition $4.8 million 2025 TBD fund balance Common Costs to All Options, Not Included In Above Costs $3.6 million Current unfunded budget • Water/sewer/irrigation y to $9 millionfor 6th Ave Rebuild and • Relocating power underground LRail Renovation Project 4+" -y RC e r ( .. 51 d. it I11 � sh'1;�11 �,.i` ch �i' .d ��"_a �'�.4� i_l E ; ?' ;L��,' e� itrj�� v 77 Council Role City Staff ( Bill's Role ) • Consider public feedback for • Direct design policy direction • Incorporate lessons learned from • Provide direction on elements to North 1st Street project incorporate into final design • Ongoing coordination and communication with stakeholders • Provide funding • Other funding (if possible) • Not design • Decision to be made June 3, 2025 78 Options Option Description Practical Solution Only required improvements: roadway, sidewalks, bike facility, etc. Enhanced Improvements Max extent feasible improvements for all elements, except trolley Max Improvements Max extent feasible improvements for all elements, including trolley Couplet Alternative Same three options (Practical, Enhanced, Max) applied to a couplet roadway configuration (d) 79